The present invention relates to supports for wafers in semiconductor processing chambers and, more particularly, to a system for supporting a wafer above a susceptor within a chemical vapor deposition chamber.
High-temperature ovens, or reactors, are used to process semiconductor wafers from which integrated circuits are made for the electronics industry. A circular wafer or substrate, typically made of silicon, is placed on a wafer support called a susceptor. Both the wafer and susceptor are enclosed in a quartz chamber and heated to high temperatures, such as 600° C. (1112° F.) or higher, frequently by a plurality of radiant lamps placed around the quartz chamber. A reactant gas is passed over the heated wafer, causing the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of a thin layer of the reactant material on the wafer. Through subsequent processes in other equipment, these layers are made into integrated circuits, with a single layer producing from tens to thousands of integrated circuits, depending on the size of the wafer and the complexity of the circuits.
If the deposited layer has the same crystallographic structure as the underlying silicon wafer, it is called an epitaxial layer. This is also sometimes called a monocrystalline layer because it has only one crystal structure.
Various CVD process parameters must be carefully controlled to ensure the high quality of the resulting semiconductor. One such critical parameter is the temperature of the wafer during the processing. The deposition gas reacts at particular temperatures and deposits on the wafer. If the temperature varies greatly across the surface of the wafer, uneven deposition of the reactant gas occurs.
In certain batch processors (i.e., CVD reactors which process more than one wafer at a time) wafers are placed on a relatively large-mass susceptor made of graphite or other heat-absorbing material to help the temperature of the wafers remain uniform. In this context, a “large-mass” susceptor is one which has a large thermal mass relative to the wafer. Mass is equal to the density times volume. The thermal mass is equal to mass times specific heat capacitance.
One example of a large-mass susceptor is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,496,609 issued to McNeilly, which discloses a CVD process wherein the wafers are placed directly on a relatively large-mass, slab-like susceptor and maintained in intimate contact to permit a transfer of heat therebetween. The graphite susceptor supposedly acts as a thermal “flywheel” which transfers heat to the wafer to maintain its temperature uniform and relatively constant. The goal is to reduce transient temperature variations around the wafer that would occur without the “flywheel” effect of the susceptor.
In recent years, single-wafer processing of larger diameter wafers has grown for a variety of reasons including its greater precision as opposed to processing batches of wafers at the same time. Although single-wafer processing by itself provides advantages over batch processing, control of process parameters and throughput remains critical. In systems in which the wafer is supported in intimate contact with a large-mass, slab-like susceptor, the necessity of maintaining uniform susceptor temperature during heat-up and cool-down cycles limited the rate at which the temperature could be changed. For example, in order to maintain temperature uniformity across the susceptor, the power input to the edges of the susceptor had to be significantly greater than the power input to the center due to the edge effects.
Another significant problem faced when attempting to obtain high-quality CVD films is particulate contamination. One troublesome source of particulates in the CVD of metals and other conductors is the film that forms on the back side of the wafer under certain conditions. For example, if the wafer back side is unprotected or inadequately protected during deposition, a partial coating of the CVD material forms thereon. This partial coating tends to peel and flake easily for some types of materials, introducing particulates into the chamber during deposition and subsequent handling steps. One example of protecting the back side of a wafer during processing is given in U.S. Pat. No. 5,238,499 to van de Ven, et al. In this patent an inert gas is introduced through a circular groove in the peripheral region of a support platen. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,356,476 to Foster, et al., a semiconductor wafer processing apparatus is shown, including a plurality of ducts for introducing helium or hydrogen around the perimeter of a wafer to prevent flow of reactant gases downwardly into a gap between the perimeter of the wafer and a wafer support lip. The aforementioned devices, however, share the feature of rather large wafer support platens, characterized by the aforementioned detrimental high thermal mass.
Presently, there is a need for an improved wafer support system while ensuring temperature uniformity across the wafer surface.
The present invention embodies a susceptor which supports a wafer spaced therefrom and effectively decouples conductive heat transfer between the two elements. The wafer is supported on one or more spacers in a recess preferably in an upper surface of the susceptor, the top plane of the wafers preferably being approximately level with an outer ledge of the susceptor. The susceptor preferably includes a plurality of interior passages opening into the recess at a plurality of small sweep gas holes. A sweep gas flows through the susceptor and out the holes and protects the back side of the wafer from deposition gas and particulate contamination. The sweep gas is heated as it flows through the susceptor so as not to cause localized cooling of the wafer and possible areas of slip.
In one embodiment, the susceptor is formed by top and bottom mating sections and the internal passages are formed by grooves in one of the juxtaposed surfaces of the two sections. Desirably, a multi-armed member supports and rotates the susceptor, the member preferably being substantially transparent to radiant energy. The arms of the support member are preferably hollow and deliver sweep gas to the lower surface of the susceptor at apertures in communication with the internal passages. Some of the sweep gas may be diverted to exit the susceptor proximate the spacers to provide sweep gas protection therearound at all times.
In one aspect, the invention provides a susceptor to be positioned in a high temperature processing chamber for supporting a wafer to be processed. The susceptor includes a thin, substantially disc shaped lower section and a thin, substantially disc shaped upper section having a lower surface in engagement with an upper surface of said lower section. One of the sections has an outer diameter larger than that of the other section, the larger section having a recess in which the other section is positioned. One or more gas channels are defined by the engaging surfaces of the sections. The susceptor includes one or more gas inlets in the lower section opening to its lower surface and the channels. One or more gas outlets in the upper section open to the upper surface of the upper section in an area beneath that in which a wafer to be processed is to be positioned. The mating recess is preferably formed in a lower surface of the upper section. In one form, the channels are formed by grooves in the upper surface of the lower section with the grooves being closed by the lower surface of the upper section. There are preferably three of the inlets each opening to the channels, the channels being interconnected to allow gas flow throughout.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides an apparatus for chemical vapor deposition on a semiconductor wafer comprising a deposition chamber having a process gas inlet for injecting process gases into the chamber. A single susceptor is provided in the chamber. A support for the susceptor includes a central shaft positioned below the susceptor axis and a plurality of support arms extending radially and upwardly from the shaft with the arms having upper ends adapted to engage the lower surface and support the susceptor. One or more of the arms are tubular and in registry with inlets in the susceptor so that gas may be conducted through the tubular arms into the inlets.
The present invention also provides a method of supporting a semiconductor wafer in a processing chamber and conducting gas flow beneath the wafer. The method comprises the steps of positioning the wafer on a plurality of spacers protruding upwardly from an upper surface of the susceptor to support the wafer and form a gap between the wafer and the upper surface of the susceptor. The susceptor is supported on a plurality of arms having upper ends engaging a lower surface of the susceptor. Gas flows through one or more of the arms into passages in the susceptor which open to the gap. The gas is allowed to flow outwardly beyond the periphery of the wafer. Desirably, the spacers are positioned in apertures in the susceptor, and some of the gas flows from the arms through the susceptor passages and into the gap via the apertures surrounding the spacers.
In another aspect of the invention, an apparatus for supporting wafers in a semiconductor processing environment includes a lower section and a plurality of disk-shaped upper sections each adapted to register concentrically with the lower section. The upper sections each have a shallow wafer recess sized differently than the other upper sections to enable selection of the upper section depending on the size of wafer to be processed. The apparatus preferably includes at least two upper sections for processing wafers having diameters greater than 100 mm.
a is a detailed view of one embodiment of a wafer spacer in the form of a pin;
b is a detailed view of an alternative wafer spacer in the form of a sphere;
The chamber 20 comprises a quartz tube defined by an upper wall 24, a lower wall 26, an upstream flange 28, and a downstream flange 30. Although not shown in the figure, the walls have a concave inner surface and a convex outer surface which, when viewed from a lateral cross-section, has a lenticular shape; and lateral edges of the reaction chamber 20 include relatively thick side rails between which a chamber support plate 32 is attached.
An elongated tube 34 depends from a centrally located region of the lower wall 26. A drive shaft 36 extends through the tube 34 and into a lower region 38 of the chamber 20. The lower region 38 is defined between the central chamber support plate 32 and the lower wall 26. The upper end of the drive shaft 36 is tapered to fit within a recess of a multi-armed support or spider assembly 40 for rotating a segmented susceptor 42. The susceptor 42 supports a wafer 44, shown in phantom. A motor (not shown) drives the shaft 36 to, in turn, rotate the wafer support system 22 and wafer 44 thereon within the aperture 33. A gas injector 46 introduces process gas, as indicated by arrow 48, into an upper region 50 of the chamber 20. The upper region 50 is defined between the upper wall 24 and the chamber support plate 32. The process gas passes over the top surface of the wafer 44 to deposit chemicals thereon. The system typically includes a plurality of radiant heat lamps arrayed around the outside of the reaction chamber 20 for heating the wafer 44 and catalyzing the chemical deposition thereon. An upper bank of elongated heat lamps 51 is illustrated outside of the upper wall 24, and typically a lower bank of lamps arranged cross-wise to the upper bank is also utilized. Further, a concentrated array of lamps directed upward from underneath the susceptor 42 is often used.
A source of sweep gas 37 is schematically shown connected through a mass flow controller 39 to the drive shaft 36. Gas flows into the space within the hollow shaft 36 and is eventually directed upward through the susceptor 42, as will be more fully described below. The fluid coupling allowing gas to the interior of the hollow, rotating shaft 36 is not shown, but may accomplished by a number of means, one of which is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,821,674, issued Apr. 18, 1989, hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
A wafer is introduced to the reaction chamber 20 through a wafer entry port 47. The wafer is typically transported by a robot pick-up arm (not shown) which enters through the port 47 and extends over the wafer support system 22 to deposit the wafer thereon. The CVD system then seals the reaction chamber 20 and introduces deposition gas with a carrier gas such as hydrogen for depositing a layer of silicon or other material on the wafer. After processing, a gate valve opens and the robot pick-up arm enters through the port 47 and retracts the wafer from the susceptor 42. Periodically, the reaction chamber 20 must be conditioned for subsequent processing. A typical sequence is the introduction of an etch gas into the reaction chamber with the gate valve closed to clean any particular deposition from the interior walls. After the etching, a silicon precursor is sometimes introduced into the chamber to provide a thin coat of silicon on the susceptor 42. Such a coating step is sometimes termed capping. After the etching and capping steps, the chamber is purged with hydrogen and heated for introduction of the next wafer.
The tube 34 is sized slightly larger than the drive shaft 36 to provide space therebetween through which purge gas 52 flows. The purge gas enters the lower region 38 of the reaction chamber 20 to help prevent reactant gas from depositing in the lower region. In this respect, the purge gas 52 creates a positive pressure below the wafer support system 22, which helps prevent reactant gas from traveling around the sides of the segment susceptor 42 in the lower region 38. The purge gas is then exhausted, as indicated with arrows 55, between the susceptor 42 and aperture 33 into the upper region 50 and then through an elongated slot 60 in the downstream flange 30. This ensures that reactant gases do not migrate into the lower region 38. The purge gas continues through an exhaust system 58. The reactant gas likewise passes through the elongated slot 60 in the downstream flange 30 to be vented through the exhaust system 58.
Preferably, a temperature compensation ring 62 surrounds the wafer support system 22. The ring 62 fits in the opening 35 created by the aperture 33 in the support plate 32, and the wafer support system 22 and ring substantially fill the opening and provide structure between the lower and upper chamber regions 38, 50. The susceptor 42 rotates within the ring 62 and is preferably spaced therefrom across a small annular gap of between 0.5 and 1.5 millimeters. The shape of the aperture 33 in the support plate 32 surrounding the ring 62 can be made circular so that the edges of the opening 35 are in close proximity to the ring. However, it has been found that a generally rectangular aperture 33 is preferred. In this respect, the ring 62 may have a generally rectangular outer periphery, or a second structure may be utilized to fill the gap between the circular ring and the aperture 33. As will be described in greater detail below, the susceptor 42 is preferably manufactured to have a constant outer diameter to fit within the ring 62, and surrounding aperture 33. Although the susceptor 42 has a constant outer diameter, it will be seen that various configurations are provided for processing a number of different size wafers.
In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the temperature compensation ring 62 comprises a two-part structure circular ring having a cavity therein for receiving thermocouples 64. In the embodiment shown, the thermocouples 64 enter the chamber 20 through apertures formed in the downstream flange 30 and extend underneath the support plate 32 into the temperature compensation ring 62. The apertures in the quartz flange 30 substantially prevent gas leakage around the thermocouples 64, although typically no additional seal is used. There are preferably three such thermocouples, one terminating at a leading edge 66, one terminating at a trailing edge 68, and one terminating at either of the lateral sides of the ring 62. The thermocouples within the ring 62 surrounding the segmented susceptor 42 provide good temperature information feedback for accurate control of the radiant heating lamps. A plurality of bent fingers 70 attached to the support plate 32 support the ring 62 around the periphery of the susceptor 42. In addition to the ring 62 and thermocouples therein, a central thermocouple 72 extends upward through the drive shaft 36, which is hollow, and through the spider assembly 40 to terminate underneath the center of the susceptor 42. The central thermocouple 72 thus provides an accurate gauge of the temperature near the center of the wafer 44. Because the temperature of a wafer changes quickly in the present system, it is desirable that the mass of the thermocouples be minimized to speed response time.
Referring to
With reference to the exploded view of
At spaced locations distributed around a circle concentric about the axis of the susceptor 42, a plurality of counter-bored holes 98 are formed proximate the upper step 88. The counter-bored holes 98 include a smaller through hole opening to the circular recess 42 and a larger counterbore concentric with the smaller through hole and opening downwardly to the annular recess 94. Each counter-bored hole 98 is sized to receive a wafer support or spacer 100 which projects into the circular recess 92. The wafer 44 rests on the spacers 100 above the floor of the recess 92. In this respect, the recess 92 is sized to receive a wafer therein so that the edge of the wafer is very close to the step 88. The upper section 78 further includes a downwardly depending central spindle 102 defining a radially inner border of the annular recess 94. A central thermocouple cavity 104 is defined in the spindle 102 for receiving a sensing end of the central thermocouple 72 previously described.
With reference to
With reference to
In an alternative embodiment, the curved arms of the spider assembly 40 may be replaced by a pair of perpendicularly disposed tubes. That is, for each of the three arms, a first tube may extend radially outward from the central hub 76 and couple with a second larger tube perpendicular thereto and extending upward to fit closely within the arm receiving cavities 114. This arrangement can be visualized somewhat like a corncob pipe. The first tubes of each arm may radiate horizontally from the hub 76 or may be slightly upwardly angled. Utilizing straight cylindrical sections, rather than a curved quartz tube, is less expensive to manufacture.
Referring back to
In an alternative embodiment, seen in
The fixed spacers 100 define a planar support platform or stand for the wafer 44 to space the wafer above the segmented susceptor 42, and in this respect at least three spacers are required, although more than three may be provided. Preferably, the spacers 100 are manufactured of a ceramic or naturally occurring or synthetically fabricated sapphire, sapphire being a single crystal structure derived from aluminum oxide. In an alternative configuration, the spacers 100 may be formed of amorphous quartz, although this material may eventually devitrify from the repeated thermal cycling within the reaction chamber 20. Further materials which may be used for the spacers include monocrystalline or single crystal quartz, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, boron carbide, boron nitride, aluminum nitride, and zirconium carbide, or other high-temperature resistant material capable of withstanding the extreme temperatures and the chemical environment in the wafer processing chamber. Any of these materials may additionally be coated with Si, Si3N4, SiO2 or SiC to protect the spacers from deterioration from exposure to process gases.
To prevent back-side contamination of the wafer 44 from reactant gases entering between the wafer and the susceptor 42, a novel sweep gas system is provided. The system also preheats the gas which contacts the wafer and which if not heated would cause localized cooling and possible areas of slip on the wafer. More particularly and with reference to
The circular delivery groove 112 is formed directly underneath the circular pattern of sweep gas outlets 96. As seen in
Although other gases may be substituted, hydrogen is preferred as it is compatible with many CVD processing regimes. As a result of the excellent control over the backside of the wafer through the use of the purge gas, wafers with double-sided polishing can be processed successfully, unlike a system with the wafer in contact with the susceptor.
The present invention includes the mass flow controller 39 to regulate the flow of sweep gas through the hollow shaft 36 and segmented susceptor for different processing pressures. That is, some processes are at atmospheric pressure, and some are at reduced pressure. In the case of a fixed restriction to control flow, a reduced pressure process will tend to increase the flow of gas through the sweep gas outlets 96 as compared to an atmospheric process, all other variables remaining the same. Thus, the mass flow controller 39 operates independently from the process pressure to ensure a constant flow of less than 5 standard liters/minute.
In a departure from the first embodiment, as seen in
An alternative embodiment of gas passage grooves through the susceptor is shown in
Looking at
Four outlets 176 are shown distributed evenly about each of the circles 178a,b,c, but more or less may be provided. Furthermore, the circumferential orientation of the outlets 176 may be staggered between the circles 178 as shown. With four outlets 176 per circle 178, each pattern of outlets is rotated 30□ with respect to one of the other patterns. Alternatively, for example, eight outlets 176 per circle 178 evenly distributed and staggered would mean that each pattern of outlets is rotated 15□ with respect to one of the other patterns. The staggering between patterns creates a more effective gas sweep under the wafer, as shown by arrows 180, than if the outlets 176 were aligned.
In another variation, the upper section 162 may be used with the lower section 80 described above with respect to
The separation between the wafer 44 and the segmented susceptor 42, as well as the minimal direct support provided by the three spacers 100, effectively decouples the wafer and susceptor from heat conduction therebetween. The wafer 44 temperature is thus influenced primarily from radiant heat flux provided by the lamps surrounding the chamber.
The spider assembly 40 is preferably constructed of quartz to provide a transparent support to the underside of the susceptor 42 to minimize the obstruction of radiant heat emitted from the lower heat lamps. Although quartz is preferred, other materials having a relatively high coefficient of radiant heat transmission may be utilized. To construct the spider assembly 40, the hub 76 is first machined into the proper shape. The tubular arms 74 are bent from straight portions and attached to the hub 76 by welding, for example. Heat treating and fire polishing reduce internal stresses in the quartz.
With reference
In a departure from the previously described susceptors, the segmented susceptor 208 includes two concentric circles of sweep gas outlets. An outer circle of twelve sweep gas outlets 214 surrounds an inner circle of twelve sweep gas outlets 216. It can be readily seen from
The underside of the bottom section 218 includes three shallow spider arm cavities 230, similar to those previously described. The cavities 230 communicate with vertical gas flow passages 232 leading to a plurality of gas distribution grooves 234 formed in the upper surface of the bottom susceptor section 218. As seen in
Both gas distribution grooves 234 intersect a continuous outer circular delivery groove 236 concentrically formed in the bottom section 218. From the outer groove 236, a plurality of angled spokes 238 lead to an inner circular delivery groove 240, again concentrically formed in the bottom section 218. Although the gas distribution grooves 234 are shown continuing directly into each of the spokes 238, other arrangements are possible. Furthermore, the spokes 238 are shown intersecting the inner circular delivery groove 240 at generally tangential angles, but may also be connected at other more direct radial angles. The gas flow passages 232 are located radially outward from the sweep gas outlets 216 and the gas distribution grooves 234 desirably traverse a nonlinear path therebetween, preferably longer than a direct line between any of the passages 232 and outlets 216, and most preferably in a circuitous pattern such as the one shown.
The inner circular delivery groove 240 lies directly underneath the inner circle of sweep gas outlets 216 when the top section 208 is coupled over the bottom section 218. Likewise, the outer circular delivery groove 236 lies directly underneath the outer circle of sweep gas outlets 214. This arrangement allows for an even pressure and supply of sweep gas to all of the outlets 214, 216 in the top surface of the segmented susceptor 208. The pressure created between the top and bottom sections 208, 218, is reduced somewhat from previously described embodiments by the increase in the number of sweep gas outlets 214, 216, and by the reduction in size of the inlet gas flow passages 232. More specifically, the inlet gas flow passages 232 have a diameter of approximately 0.060 to 0.070 inches.
In a departure from previous embodiments, and as seen in
The present invention provides a susceptor combination enabling selection of different upper sections depending on the wafer size to be processed. Such a combination is especially useful in the reaction chamber 20 having the support plate 32. As mentioned above, the susceptor preferably has a constant outer diameter to fit within the ring 62, and aperture 33 in the support plate 32. As the upper section defines the outer perimeter of the susceptor, it will by necessity have a constant diameter while the wafer recess varies in size to accommodate the different wafer sizes. The bottom shape of each of the upper sections is designed to mate with a single lower section, which reduces costs somewhat.
In a fourth version of the top section 302, seen in
Also, while the completely ring shaped blockers discussed above are the currently preferred shape, blocker that does not extend completely to a closed 360° shape would be utilized. Similarly, a ring could be made as two or more separate pieces that could substantially form a ring would be useful. In addition a blocker not completely circular could be used. Other such changes are also included to come within the scope of the appended claims.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments are also within the scope of this invention. For example, although some of the illustrated embodiments are described for specific sizes of wafers, the same features may also be used to accommodate larger wafers. Indeed, wafers of 300 mm or larger are presently contemplated to supplement traditional 200 mm and smaller sized wafers.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/642,799, filed Aug. 18, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No 7,186,298, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/243,579 filed Sep. 13, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,576, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/932,795 filed Aug. 17, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,757, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/605,094 filed Jun. 27, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,343,183, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/923,241 filed Sep. 4, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,702, which claims the priority benefit of Provisional application 60/039,850 filed Mar. 5, 1997 and is a continuation-in-part of abandoned application Ser. No. 08/788,817 filed Jan. 23, 1997 now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/706,069 filed Aug. 30, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,053,982, which claims the priority benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/003,132, filed Sep. 1, 1995. This application hereby incorporates by reference herein the entire disclosures of each of the foregoing applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3627590 | Mammel | Dec 1971 | A |
4261762 | King | Apr 1981 | A |
4313783 | Davies et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4403567 | DaCosta et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4457359 | Holden | Jul 1984 | A |
4458746 | Holden et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4508161 | Holden | Apr 1985 | A |
4512391 | Harra | Apr 1985 | A |
4522697 | Dimock et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4523985 | Dimock | Jun 1985 | A |
4527620 | Pedersen et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535834 | Turner | Aug 1985 | A |
4535835 | Holden | Aug 1985 | A |
4537244 | Holden | Aug 1985 | A |
4542298 | Holden | Sep 1985 | A |
4565601 | Kakehi et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567938 | Turner | Feb 1986 | A |
4603466 | Morley | Aug 1986 | A |
4654509 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4709655 | Van Mastrigt | Dec 1987 | A |
4724621 | Hobson et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4789771 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4790262 | Nakayama et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4860687 | Frijlink | Aug 1989 | A |
4911812 | Kudo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4923584 | Bramhall, Jr. et al. | May 1990 | A |
4949783 | Lakios et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958061 | Wakabayashi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5027746 | Frijlink | Jul 1991 | A |
5033407 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033538 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5090900 | Rudolf et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5096536 | Cathey, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133284 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148714 | McDiarmid | Sep 1992 | A |
5155062 | Coleman | Oct 1992 | A |
5156820 | Wong et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160544 | Garg et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5177878 | Visser et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180000 | Wagner et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5199483 | Bahng | Apr 1993 | A |
5215619 | Cheng et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221403 | Nozawa et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230741 | Van de Ven et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5238499 | Van de Ven et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248370 | Tsui et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5267607 | Wada | Dec 1993 | A |
5287914 | Hughes | Feb 1994 | A |
5290381 | Nozawa et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5292393 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298465 | Levy | Mar 1994 | A |
5308645 | Zachman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318634 | deBoer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320982 | Tsubone et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322565 | Zachman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332442 | Kubodera et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343012 | Hardy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343938 | Schmidt | Sep 1994 | A |
5350479 | Collins et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352294 | White et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354382 | Sung et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356476 | Foster et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370739 | Foster et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382311 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383971 | Selbrede | Jan 1995 | A |
5387289 | Schmitz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393349 | Ohkase | Feb 1995 | A |
5403401 | Haafkens et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5421893 | Perlov | Jun 1995 | A |
5445677 | Kawata et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446824 | Moslehi | Aug 1995 | A |
5456757 | Aruga et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458687 | Shichida et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462603 | Murakami | Oct 1995 | A |
5467220 | Xu | Nov 1995 | A |
5484011 | Tepman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522131 | Steger | Jun 1996 | A |
5645646 | Beinglass et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656093 | Burkhart et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5685906 | Dietze et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5738165 | Imai | Apr 1998 | A |
6053982 | Halpin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6113702 | Halpin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6203622 | Halpin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248176 | Yudovsky et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6343163 | Kawanishi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343183 | Halpin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6454865 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454866 | Halpin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491757 | Halpin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6596095 | Ries et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
20030168174 | Foree | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 445 596 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 448 346 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 452 779 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 592 017 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 651 424 | May 1995 | EP |
0 657 918 | Jun 1995 | EP |
2181458 | Apr 1987 | GB |
62020308 | Jan 1987 | JP |
63084017 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63285925 | Nov 1988 | JP |
02243798 | Aug 1990 | JP |
4-211117 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05013350 | Jan 1993 | JP |
6-349750 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-254557 | Oct 1995 | JP |
7-335630 | Dec 1995 | JP |
8-17902 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-31754 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-139046 | May 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070131173 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60003132 | Sep 1995 | US | |
60039850 | Mar 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10243579 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10642799 | US | |
Parent | 09605094 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 09932795 | US | |
Parent | 08923241 | Sep 1997 | US |
Child | 09605094 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10642799 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11668409 | US | |
Parent | 09932795 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10243579 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08788817 | Jan 1997 | US |
Child | 08923241 | US | |
Parent | 08706069 | Aug 1996 | US |
Child | 08788817 | US |