The invention relates generally to contact centers and specifically to queuing arrangements in automatic call-distribution systems.
In automatic call-distribution or ACD systems, contacts incoming to a contact center are answered and handled by a plurality of resources, such as agents. The ACD system automatically distributes and connects incoming contacts to whatever resources are suited to handle the contacts and available, that is, not handling other contacts at that moment. A contact can be effected by any communication medium, such as a trunk or telephone line, and wirelessly and by any mode, such as by telephone, email, Web server, and the Internet.
It often happens that contactors, while awaiting service by a resource, need to accomplish other tasks or perform other duties, such as answering an incoming call, going to the bathroom, attending to children, and the like. In conventional ACD systems, if the contactor is absent when the contact is handed off to a resource for service, the resource must decide whether to wait for the contactor to return or to service the next contact. Commonly, the contact is terminated by the resource due to heavy workload and/or uncertainty about what happened to the contactor. This can cause customer frustration and lost business.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The method and apparatus of the present invention permit a contact to be flagged as not ready to be served. The contactor corresponding to the contact can then attend to other duties without losing his or her position in the queue.
In one embodiment, a flag is used to indicate state or mode. As will be appreciated, a flag is a variable or data structure indicating that a certain condition exists as to the item or system corresponding to the flag. The flag is associated with the enqueued data structures corresponding to each contact. In one setting, the flag indicates that the contact is in a first state in which the contact is eligible for service. In one implementation, the first state is referred to as the Waiting And Ready state or WR state. Each new contact is initialized in the WR state. In a different setting, the flag indicates that the contact is in a second, different state in which the contact is ineligible for service. In the implementation referred to previously, the second state is referred to as the Waiting But Not Ready or WNR state. A contact is commonly changed to the WNR state at some point after being placed in the queue. Background music and/or messages can provide feedback to the contact to let him know which state he is currently waiting in and how to change to the other state.
The relative positions of the enqueued contacts in a first queue are not impacted by the particular state assigned to the contact until the contact reaches the head of the first queue. When a first contact in the WNR state reaches the head of the first queue, the first contact is moved to a second, different queue or is held at the head of the first queue. Subsequently enqueued contacts that are in the WR state can skip over the first contact to be serviced by the next available resource. In this manner, contacts in the WNR state at the head of the queue or in the second queue will not block other contacts from progressing through the first queue. In either event, when the WNR state of the first contact is changed to the WR state, the first contact is considered to be eligible for service and is treated as being at the head of the queue waiting to be assigned to the next available resource.
The invention can have several advantages. First, the invention can provide increased levels of service and customer convenience and satisfaction. Customers can flag themselves as being not ready for service without losing their enqueued positions. The customer can walk away and attend to other duties while remaining in a wait queue for service. When ready for service, the customer can cause his or her status to be changed and resume his or her position in the queue. Second, the invention can permit a customer to wait in multiple queues simultaneously without losing his or her position in any of the other queues when a resource corresponding to one of the queues serves the customer. While being served in a first queue, the customer's status can be changed from the WR state to the WNR state in the other queues. When service is completed, the customer can be changed back to the WR state in the other queues.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The contact center can be any architecture for serving contacts using one or more resources. Illustratively, the contact center of
According to the invention, the contact center further comprises a set 120 of high priority queues 124a-n containing contacts that have elected to wait for servicing, state monitor 128 for assigning one of a waiting-and-ready or WR state and a waiting-but-not ready or WNR state to an enqueued contact, and a selection agent 132 for selecting enqueued contacts for servicing and for transferring enqueued contacts, that are eligible for servicing but are assigned the WNR state, from a queue 112 in the queue set 110 to a corresponding queue 124 in the queue set 120. Each queue in queue set 110 normally has a corresponding high priority queue in queue set 120, though a plurality of queues in queue set 110 can have only one corresponding queue in queue set 120. The WR state refers to a contact that is waiting for service and desires to be serviced when it reaches the head of the queue, and the WNR state to a contact that is waiting for service but does not desire to be serviced when it reaches the head of the queue. State monitor 128 and selection agent 132 are stored either in main memory (shown) or in a peripheral memory (e.g., disk, CD ROM, etc.) or some other computer-readable medium of the contact center.
The functionality implemented by an illustrative embodiment of state monitor 128 is shown in
In step 200, the state monitor 128 determines after a predetermined time interval whether it has received a request by an enqueued contact to enter into the WNR state. If no such request has been received, the state monitor 128 waits the predetermined time interval and repeats step 200. If one or more state change requests have been received during the preceding time interval, the state monitor 128 proceeds to step 204.
The monitor 128 determines in step 204 whether the contact center is accepting the WNR state. There may be reasons why it is undesirable for the contact center to accept the state, such as unduly heavy contact volume. When the contact center is not accepting the WNR state, the state monitor 128 in step 208 retrieves an estimated wait time for the contact from the EWT agent and notifies the contact of the nonacceptance of the state change request and the estimated wait time to service. The monitor 128 then returns to step 200. When the contact center is accepting the WNR state, the state monitor 128 in step 212 notifies the contactor making the request that the contactor has been assigned the WNR state and that the state can be changed back to the WR state only by inputting a second predetermined code or hanging up and recontacting the contact center. Like the first code, the second code can be a predetermined set or sequence of bits, a feature access code or DTMF digit(s), a voice command, or any other type or form of signal. In step 216, the monitor changes the state assigned to the contact from the WR state to the WNR state. In one configuration, a flag field 140 is included within each data entry corresponding to an enqueued contact, and the flag field is set to a predetermined value to indicate that the flag has been set. For example, a “0” in the field can mean that the flag is not set and the contact has been assigned the WR state while a “1” in the field can mean that the flag is set and the contact has been assigned the WNR state. As will be appreciated the meanings of the values can be reversed.
In decision diamond 220, the state monitor 128 next determines if it has received from the selected contact a request to enter the WR state. If not, the state monitor repeats the query after a predetermined time interval has elapsed. If so, the state monitor proceeds to step 224 in which the WNR flag is unset (or assigned a value corresponding to the WR state) and then to step 228 in which the contactor is notified of the state change.
The steps of
Referring now to
In decision diamond 304, the agent 132 next determines whether the state monitor 128 has reassigned the WR state to one or more contacts enqueued in one of the high priority queues in queue set 120. The contact to which the WR state is reassigned is handed off for service in step 308. When multiple contacts have been reassigned the WR state during the predetermined time interval, the contacts are considered in the order in which the reassignment requests are received. Alternatively, the contacts can be selected based on the cumulative wait time, whether in the WR and/or WNR states. In this configuration, the contacts are selected in an order based on their cumulative wait times, e.g., the contact having the longest cumulative wait time is selected ahead of the contact having the next longest cumulative wait time and so on. The contact corresponding to the first received request is thus selected for service. If no contact has been reassigned the WR state, the agent 132 proceeds to decision diamond 312.
In decision diamond 312, the agent 132 determines whether a selected contact at the head of one of the queues 112 in queue set 110 is in the WR state. When the selected contact is not in the WR state but rather is in the WNR state, the contact is moved from its queue 112 in queue set 110 to a corresponding high priority queue 124 in queue set 120. When the selected contact is in the WR state, the contact is handed off to a resource 104 for service in step 312.
An example of the foregoing is illustrated by
The steps of
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.
For example, one alternative embodiment is depicted in
This embodiment is depicted by
A functional implementation of this embodiment is shown in
When a resource and WR contact are available, the agent 132 proceeds to step 508 and determines whether the selected (WR state) contact is enqeueud for service in one or more other queues. If so, the state of the contact in the other queues is set by the state monitor 128 to the WNR state in step 512. If not or after the completion of step 508, the contact is served in step 516. After the monitor 128 determines in step 520 that the contact has been served, the WNR state is changed by the monitor 128 in step 524 to the WR state in each of the other queues.
In another alternative embodiment, a resource can cause a contact to be placed in the WNR state during servicing of the contact. This embodiment is useful where the contactor corresponding to the contact needs to collect information or attend to a duty and does not wish to have to terminate the contact and initiate a new contact. If a new contact is initiated, the contact would lose his or her position vis a vis other contacts in the queue 112.
In yet another embodiment, a high priority contact would not be used. Rather, a contact would request a wait time before, during or after the assignment from the WR state to the WNR state. The state monitor 128 would either relocate the contact to an appropriate position in the queue (i.e., a queue position having an estimated wait time corresponding to the requested wait time) and/or start a timer corresponding to the contact and consider the contact eligible for service only when the timer has expired.
In yet a further embodiment, the state monitor 128 and/or selection agent 132 are implemented, in whole or part, as a logic circuit, such as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit or ASIC.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g. for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. Although the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4163124 | Jolissaint | Jul 1979 | A |
4567323 | Lottes et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4737983 | Frauenthal et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4797911 | Szlam et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4894857 | Szlam et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5001710 | Gawrys et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5097528 | Gursahaney et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101425 | Darland | Mar 1992 | A |
5155761 | Hammond | Oct 1992 | A |
5164983 | Brown et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5206903 | Kohler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210789 | Jeffus et al. | May 1993 | A |
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278898 | Cambray et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291550 | Levy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299260 | Shaio | Mar 1994 | A |
5309513 | Rose | May 1994 | A |
5335268 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335269 | Steinlicht | Aug 1994 | A |
5390243 | Casselman et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436965 | Grossman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444774 | Friedes | Aug 1995 | A |
5469503 | Butensky et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469504 | Blaha | Nov 1995 | A |
5473773 | Aman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479497 | Kovarik | Dec 1995 | A |
5500795 | Powers et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504894 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506898 | Constantini et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530744 | Charalambous et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537470 | Lee | Jul 1996 | A |
5537542 | Eilert et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544232 | Baker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546452 | Andrews et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5592378 | Cameron et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592542 | Honda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594726 | Thompson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606361 | Davidsohn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611076 | Durflinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627884 | Williams et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642515 | Jones et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5684872 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684874 | Yagyu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684964 | Powers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689698 | Jones et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703943 | Otto | Dec 1997 | A |
5713014 | Durflinger et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724092 | Davidsohn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740238 | Flockhart et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742675 | Kilander et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748468 | Notenboom et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749079 | Yong et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751707 | Voit et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752027 | Familiar | May 1998 | A |
5754639 | Flockhart et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754776 | Hales et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754841 | Carino, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5757904 | Anderson | May 1998 | A |
5790677 | Fox et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794250 | Carino, Jr. et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | MacNaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802282 | Hales et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818907 | Maloney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825869 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828747 | Fisher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838968 | Culbert | Nov 1998 | A |
5839117 | Cameron et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875437 | Atkins | Feb 1999 | A |
5880720 | Iwafune et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881238 | Aman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884032 | Bateman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889956 | Hauser et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897622 | Blinn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903641 | Tonisson | May 1999 | A |
5903877 | Berkowitz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905793 | Flockhart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915012 | Miloslavsky | Jun 1999 | A |
5926538 | Deryugin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930786 | Carino, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937051 | Hurd et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937402 | Pandilt | Aug 1999 | A |
5940496 | Gisby et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943416 | Gisby | Aug 1999 | A |
5948065 | Eilert et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960073 | Kikinis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963635 | Szlam et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963911 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970132 | Brady | Oct 1999 | A |
5974135 | Breneman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974462 | Aman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982873 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987117 | McNeil et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991392 | Miloslavsky | Nov 1999 | A |
5996013 | Delp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999963 | Bruno et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011844 | Uppaluru et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038293 | Mcnerney et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044144 | Becker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044205 | Reed et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044355 | Crockett et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049547 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052723 | Ginn | Apr 2000 | A |
6055308 | Miloslavsky et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064730 | Ginsberg | May 2000 | A |
6064731 | Flockhart et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084954 | Harless et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088441 | Flockhart et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115462 | Servi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6151571 | Pertrushin | Nov 2000 | A |
6154769 | Cherkasova et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163607 | Bogart et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173053 | Bogart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175564 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178441 | Elnozahy | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185292 | Miloslavsky | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192122 | Flockhart et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215865 | McCalmont | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226377 | Donaghue, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229819 | Darland et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230183 | Yocom et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233333 | Dezonmo | May 2001 | B1 |
6240417 | Eastwick | May 2001 | B1 |
6259969 | Tackett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263359 | Fong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272544 | Mullen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275806 | Pertrushin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275812 | Haq et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275991 | Erlin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278777 | Morley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292550 | Burritt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295353 | Flockhart et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6353810 | Petrushin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356632 | Foster et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366668 | Borst et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389028 | Bondarenko et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389132 | Price | May 2002 | B1 |
6389400 | Bushey et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424709 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426950 | Mistry | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427137 | Petrushin | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6430282 | Bannister et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434230 | Gabriel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449356 | Dezonno | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449358 | Anisimov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449646 | Sikora et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453038 | McFarlane et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463148 | Brady | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463346 | Flockhart et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463415 | St. John | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6480826 | Pertrushin | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490350 | McDuff et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6535600 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535601 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560330 | Gabriel | May 2003 | B2 |
6560649 | Mullen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560707 | Curtis et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563916 | Deutsch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563920 | Flockhart et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597685 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614903 | Flockhart et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650748 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6697457 | Petrushin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704409 | Dilip et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707903 | Qutub et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6754333 | Flockhart et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766013 | Flockhart et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771765 | Crowther et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6822945 | Petrovykh | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6947543 | Alvarado et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959081 | Brown et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978006 | Polcyn | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7035808 | Ford | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035927 | Flockhart et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050568 | Brown et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7076051 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095842 | Brown et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7245716 | Brown et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020194002 | Petrushin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108184 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040203878 | Thomson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2143198 | Jan 1995 | CA |
2174762 | Jun 1995 | CA |
0 501 189 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 740 450 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 772 335 | May 1997 | EP |
0 855 826 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 863 651 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0829996 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0866407 | Sep 1998 | EP |
899673 | Mar 1999 | EP |
998108 | May 2000 | EP |
1091307 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1150236 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2 273 418 | Jun 1994 | GB |
2 290 192 | Dec 1995 | GB |
WO 9607141 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9728635 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9856207 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030231757 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |