The present disclosure generally relates to the wireless transmission of electrical energy and data. More specifically, this application relates to an electrical device that facilitates the wireless transmission electrical energy at multiple operating frequencies and frequency bands.
Prior art electrical connectors are traditionally constructed with a plurality of pins that physically plug into a corresponding receiving port. Each half of these connectors are typically assigned a male and a female designation which are subsequently mated to form an electrical contact.
Fundamentally, an electrical connector is an electro-mechanical device comprising electrical conductors that are used to electrically and mechanically join other conductors, electrical terminals of apparatus and equipment to create an electrical circuit. The term electrical connector generally covers a wide range of devices designed to connect, for example, small conductors employed in communication circuits to large cables and bus-bars. They are typically passive and consist of plugs (male) and jacks (female). The connection may be temporary, as for portable equipment, or may serve as a permanent electrical joint between two wires or devices.
Examples of prior art connectors include USB and HDMI plugs. The power levels for these connectors range from a few Watts to about 100 Watts (as, for example, for the recently released USB-C). These connectors are also constructed and rated to provide data capabilities of up to 10 Gbps or higher. In addition, there are numerous types of connectors, ranging from a simplistic “Wire Nut” to more complex USB connectors or RF connectors, which mostly comply with known connection interface standards, for example, Ethernet, CAN, IO-Link, and RS485. The power levels for these connectors can range from microwatts to megawatts.
Typical connector types are in-line splice couplers, T-tap connectors, terminal lugs, and stud connectors. Couplers join conductors end to end. T-tap connectors join a through conductor to another conductor at right angles. Terminal lugs join the conductor to a drilled tongue for bolting to the terminals of equipment. Stud connectors join the conductor to equipment studs. The stud clamp is typically threaded or smooth to match the stud.
Other connector types include split-bolt connectors that are generally of a compact construction and are widely used for splicing and taping wires. The split-bolt connector comprises a bolt-shape casting having a wide and deep lengthwise slot. Conductors are inserted in the slot and a nut clamps the conductors together inside the bolt.
Yet another type of connector is an expansion or flexible connector that allows for limited motion between the connected conductors. The clamp portions of the connector are joined by short lengths of flexible copper braid and may also be held in alignment by a telescoping guide.
Another type of traditional connectors include separable type connectors that generally consist of matched plugs and receptacles. Separable type connectors are designed to separate or disconnect a conductor or group of conductors from a circuit or system. Separable type connectors are commonly used for the connection of portable devices and appliances to an electric wiring system.
Traditional connectors also include locking type connectors that are designed such that a plug is inserted and twisted through a shaped opening, locking it securely in place. Thus, when connected, locking type connectors are generally not separated by a mechanical strain such as a pull on the connected cord.
Electrical connectors are generally characterized by a variety of parameters which include, but are not limited to, the number of electrical connections (i.e. pins), physical construction, size, shape, contact resistance, insulation between electrical connections, ruggedness to vibration, resistance to contaminants and pressure, reliability, estimated lifetime (number of connect/disconnect operations before failure), and ease of connecting and disconnecting. The physical electrical connections, such as pins, of traditional connectors, provide a passage for electrical energy and data. In addition, characteristics of electrical power and data, such as power ratings and data rates are also utilized to characterize various electrical connectors.
Operation of these prior art connectors is typically dependent on the physical connection between two electrically conductive components, such as a pin and a respective pad, port or jack within which the pin is received. The physical connection occurs at a microscopic level over a relatively small interface area between the physically contacting electrically conductive components, such as a pin and a corresponding receptacle. Furthermore, traditional connectors generally require a significant amount of mechanical force to ensure an adequate physical connection of the connecting members so that an electrical signal is safely passed therethrough. This microscopic connecting area may become affected by different factors, such as harsh environments, vibration as well as wear and tear over time under normal operating conditions.
As such, the performance and reliability of these prior art connectors are largely dictated by the integrity of their physical connection. Furthermore, these traditional mechanical connectors generally require physical contact at a precise alignment to function properly.
Furthermore, wired connectors typically do not allow any relative motion between the male and the female portions. Over time, due to this physical contact, these mechanical connection points typically experience forces that can fatigue and damage the pin or port, thereby preventing proper functionality. Such prior art connectors may wear, flex, or may become corroded or damaged. As a result, the physical connection between the corresponding male and female portions such as a pin and respective port may become compromised, thereby resulting in a loss of data or electrical energy transfer therebetween due to an impaired or inoperable connector. Contamination, moisture and liquid ingress in a consumer, medical, military or industrial environment may pose undesirable problems, including outright failure to perform which may result in hazardous, unsafe or threatening conditions. In addition to improper functionality due to faulty physical connections, methods of wired communication, such as Universal Asynchronous Receiver and Transmitter Protocol (UART), Inter-Integrated Protocol (I2C), and Serial Peripheral Interface Protocol (SPI), may have limited bandwidth capabilities in comparison to various wireless methods of communication.
Moreover, developments in automation and robotics have increased the demand for transferring electrical power between dynamically moving parts and assemblies of many different industrial devices. There is a significant challenge to transfer power under these conditions using conventional wired electrical connectors.
In addition to the deficiencies given above, such prior art connectors typically comprise an electrical cord that extends from the connector. Such electrical cords are generally not desired as they may also become damaged, resulting in a loss of data or energy transfer. Furthermore, such electrical cords may excessively occupy critical space and become an impediment to the user. Moreover, exposed or damaged cords may contaminate a sterilized environment. Furthermore, such exposed or damaged cords, for example, cords that have lost their electrical insulation, may become a hazard and potentially cause electrical shock to both humans and animals.
Therefore, to address these problems, a wireless connector system is provided. In an embodiment, the wireless connector system of the present application enables the wireless transmission of electrical power and/or data between spaced apart transmitter and receiver modules using near field magnetic coupling (NFMC). In an embodiment, the respective transmitter and receiver wireless modules may be insulated and/or hermetically sealed.
The connectors have exposed contact pins and features allowing them to be assembled onto larger electrical circuits, such as a printed circuit board (PCB) or flexible circuit board (FPC) using an electrical component surface mount (SMT) assembly process.
Thus, provided is an electrical connector having a form factor that can replace or eliminate the need for wired connectors.
The wireless connector system of the present application provides a wireless power link that eliminates the need for a physical connection such as an electrical connector that physically joins two components together. Thus, by eliminating the physical connection, the wireless connector or power link can be completely encapsulated, preventing liquids and other debris from inhibiting proper functionality. Without physical contact, mechanical and environmental stresses and wear of the connector are eliminated and a more reliable and robust link to transfer power and data is achieved. This solution also allows for greater misalignment and/or relative movement between the transmitter and receiver compared to prior art connectors. This could allow these connectors to be used in applications which were not previously considered for wired connectors due to their limitations.
In one or more of the embodiments of the present application, a wireless connector system is provided that includes a transmitter module with a first substrate supporting a transmitter antenna, wherein the transmitter antenna is configured to transmit a wireless signal. In addition, the wireless connector system includes a second substrate supporting a transmitter module electronic circuit, wherein the transmitter module electronic circuit is electrically connected to the transmitter antenna. In addition, a first insulator is positioned between the transmitter module electronic circuit and the transmitter antenna. The wireless connector system further includes a receiver module with a third substrate supporting a receiving antenna, wherein the receiving antenna is configured to receive the wireless signal. Furthermore, the wireless connector system includes a fourth substrate supporting a receiver module electronic circuit, wherein the receiver module electronic circuit is electrically connected to the receiver antenna. In addition, a second insulator is positioned between the receiver module electronic circuit and the receiver antenna.
The transmitter and receiver modules of the wireless connector system of the present application are designed with electrical circuitry that increases the amount of wirelessly transmitted electrical power over a greater separation distance between the transmitter and receiver modules. In addition, the wireless connector system may be configured with various sensors that detect the presence of an electrical energy transfer module, heat, or an undesirable foreign object. In an embodiment, the operation of the transmitter and/or the receiver module may be dependent upon information obtained from various sensors that may or may not be incorporated within the module.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The wireless connector system 10 of the present disclosure provides for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data. More specifically, the wireless connector system 10 of the present invention provides for the wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data via near field magnetic coupling. In an embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 comprises a transmitter module 12 configured to transmit electrical energy and a receiver module 14 configured to receive electrical energy transmitted by the transmitter module 12. In an embodiment, the transmitter module 12 is positioned spaced from the receiver module 14 so that electrical energy is wirelessly transmitted from the transmitter module 12 across a separation distance or gap 16 (
In this application, the inventive concepts particularly pertain to near-field magnetic coupling (NFMC). Near-field magnetic coupling enables the transfer of electrical energy and/or data wirelessly through magnetic induction between a transmitting antenna and a corresponding receiving antenna. The NFC standard, based on near-field communication interface and protocol modes, is defined by ISO/IEC standard 18092. Furthermore, as defined herein “inductive charging” is a wireless charging technique that utilizes an alternating electromagnetic field to transfer electrical energy between two antennas. “Resonant inductive coupling” is defined herein as the near field wireless transmission of electrical energy between two magnetically coupled coils that are tuned to resonate at a similar frequency. As defined herein the term “shunt” means an electrically conductive pathway that is created by electrically joining two points of a circuit such that an electrical current or an electrical voltage may pass therethrough. As defined herein “mutual inductance” is the production of an electromotive force in a circuit by a change in current in a second circuit magnetically coupled to the first. As defined herein a “shielding material” is a material that captures a magnetic field. Examples of shielding material include, but are not limited to ferrite materials such as zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof. A shielding material thus may be used to direct a magnetic field to or away from an object, such as a parasitic metal, depending on the position of the shielding material within or nearby an electrical circuit. Furthermore, a shielding material can be used to modify the shape and directionality of a magnetic field. As defined herein a parasitic material, such as a parasitic metal, is a material that induces eddy current losses in the inductor antenna. This is typically characterized by a decrease in inductance and an increase in resistance of the antenna, i.e., a decrease in the quality factor.
The transmitter antenna 20 is configured to wirelessly transmit the electrical energy conditioned and modified for wireless transmission by the transmitter module circuit 18 via near-field magnetic induction coupling. In an embodiment, the transmitter module 12 may be electrically powered by the transmitter host device 22.
In an embodiment, the receiver module 14 comprises a receiver module circuit 24 that is electrically connected to a receiver module antenna 26. The receiver antenna 26 is configured to receive electrical energy and/or data that is transmitted by the transmitter module 12. In an embodiment, the receiver module circuit 24 is configured to condition the received wireless electrical energy such that it can be used to electrically power a device or provide electrical energy to an electrical energy storage device such as a battery or capacitor.
In an embodiment, the receiver module 14 is electrically connected to a receiver host device 28. In an embodiment, the receiver host device 28 comprises an electrically operated device, a circuit board, an electronic assembly, or other electronic device. Examples of receiver host devices include, but are not limited to, a medical device, a device that comprises an integrated circuit, such as a computer, and personal electronic devices, such as not but limited to eye glasses and clothing configured with electronic components. In an embodiment, the receiver module 14 may be electrically powered from an electrical power source 105 (
In an embodiment, the transmitter module 12 and the receiver module 14 may be connected to the same host device to facilitate wireless transfer of electrical energy within the host device. Alternatively, the transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14 may be electrically connected to different host devices thereby facilitating wireless transfer of electrical energy between two different devices.
In an embodiment, the voltage regulator 36 is configured to adjust the amplitude of the voltage of the electrical energy received from an electrical source, such as the transmitter host device 22, by the transmitter module circuit 18. In the embodiment shown, the voltage regulator 36 is electrically connected to an electrical power source 46 and the driver sub-circuit 38. In an embodiment, the electrical power source 46 may comprise an electrical storage device such as an electrochemical cell (not shown), a battery pack (not shown), or a capacitor (not shown). In addition, the electrical power source 46 may comprise an alternating or direct current electrical power from the transmitter host device 22. In an embodiment, the driver circuit 38 controls the operation of the electrical impedance matching or network sub-circuit 40 and/or the transmitter antenna 20. In an embodiment, the driver sub-circuit 38 may comprise an integrated circuit such as a half-bridge integrated circuit. In an embodiment, the driver sub-circuit 38 may be configured to convert at least a portion of the electrical power from a direct current electrical power to an alternating current electrical power for wireless transmission.
In an embodiment, the receiver sensing sub-circuit 42 is configured to detect the presence of the receiver module 14. In an embodiment, if the presence of the receiver module 14 is detected, wireless transmission of electrical power and/or data by the transmitter module 12 to the receiver module 14 is enabled. Likewise, in an embodiment, if the presence of the receiver module 14 is not detected, wireless transmission of electrical power and/or data is prevented from occurring. In addition, the master control unit 44, which may comprise an integrated circuit, is electrically connected to the driver sub-circuit 38. In an embodiment, the master control unit 44 controls the operation of the transmitter antenna 20 and transmitter module circuit 18. The electrical impedance matching or network circuit 40, which comprises at least one capacitor, is electrically connected to the electrical driver sub-circuit 38 and the transmitter antenna 20. The impedance matching circuit 40 provides a capacitance that is designed to adjust and match the electrical impedance of the receiver antenna 26 to a characteristic impedance of the power generator or the load at a driving frequency of the transmitter antenna 20.
In an embodiment, electrical power from an electrical source 46, such as the transmitter host device 22, is received by the voltage regulator 36 and the master control unit 44. A first portion of the electrical power, from the electrical power source 46, is configured to electrically power the components of the transmitter module 12 such as the master control unit 44. A second portion of the electrical power, from the electrical power source 46, is conditioned and modified for wireless transmission to the receiver module 14. In an embodiment, the voltage regulator 36 modifies the amplitude of the voltage of the second portion of electrical power to match the voltage requirements of the receiver host device 28. The second portion of the electrical power, conditioned by the transmitter module circuit 18 for wireless transmission, is received by the transmitter antenna 20 where it is wirelessly transmitted to the receiver module 14.
In an embodiment, as illustrated in
As shown in
In an embodiment, as illustrated in
As illustrated in the embodiments shown in
In addition to the electrical power sub-circuit 60, the embodiments of the transmitter circuit shown in
In an embodiment, as shown in
In addition to the electrical power sub-circuit 60, the embodiments of the transmitter module circuit 18 shown in
The amplified signal is then received by the master control unit 44. In an embodiment, amplifying the sense signal increases the resolution of detection thereby increasing the accuracy of the detecting for the presence of the receiver module 14. In yet another embodiment illustrated in
In an embodiment, the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 allows for increased system efficiency due to a decrease in the electrical impedance experienced by the receiver module circuit 24. Experimental results indicate that incorporation of the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 within the receiver module circuit 24 decreases the electrical impedance of the circuit 24 from about 301Ω to about 31Ω under a no load condition and decreases the electrical impedance from about 154Ω to about 4.9Ω under full load conditions, a decrease in electrical impedance by as much as 97 percent. Since the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 significantly reduces the electrical impedance of the receiver module circuit 24, incorporation of the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 within the receiver module circuit 24 thus provides for the transmission of a greater amount of electrical power across a module separation distance 16 at a given frequency. Furthermore, the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 allows for decreased component sizes and increased system performance. Moreover, the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 allows for the operation of the system 10, specifically, wireless transfer of electrical energy and data, across a wider module separation distance 16 in comparison to other rectifying topologies (e.g., a full wave rectifier). For example, the receiver module 14 of the present invention configured with the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 enables wireless transfer of electrical energy and/or data across a module separation distance 16 from about 0.5 mm to about 5 mm. In comparison, a receiver module that is not configured with the voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 allows for the transfer of electrical energy and/or data across a module separation distance 16 from about 0.5 mm to about 2 mm. The voltage doubler sub-circuit 98 thus enables an increase of the module separation distance 16 by about 100 percent or about double the module separation distance 16. Furthermore, at closer separation distances, the electrical impedance of the gate driver or FET power stage is reduced allowing for increased wireless electrical power delivery.
In an embodiment, incorporating a shunt capacitor such as those shown in
In an embodiment both the transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14 are of a compact size. In an embodiment, the transmitter module 12 has a length 110 that extends from a transmitter module proximal end 112 to a transmitter module distal end 114. The transmitter module 12 has a transmitter module width 116 oriented about perpendicular to the length 110. In an embodiment, the receiver module 14 has a receiver module length 120 that extends from a receiver module proximal end 122 to a receiver module distal end 124. The receiver module 14 comprises a receiver module width 126 oriented about perpendicular to the length 120. As illustrated in
In an embodiment, either or both the transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14 are configured to be surface mounted. In an embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, at least one of the transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14 may be constructed having a spacer 144 composed of an electrically insulating, non-magnetic material positioned within the housing 106, 108 of the transmitter or receiver module 12, 14. In an embodiment, the at least one spacer 144 is positioned between the transmitter or receiver module circuit board 140, 142 and the transmitting or receiving antenna 20, 26, respectively within the housing 106, 108. In an embodiment, at least one shielding material 146 may be positioned within the housing 106, 108 of either or both the transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14. In an embodiment, the at least one shielding material 146 is positioned between the transmitter or receiver module circuit board 140, 142 and the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26, respectively within the housing 106, 108. In an embodiment, the at least one shielding material 146 may be positioned between the transmitter or receiver module circuit board 140, 142 and the at least one spacer 144. In an embodiment, the at least one shielding material 146 may be positioned between the at least one spacer 144 and the transmitter or receiver module antenna 20, 26. As illustrated in the example shown in
In an embodiment, the circuit board may either be the transmitter module circuit board 140 or the receiver module circuit board 142, the antenna may either be the transmitter antenna 20 or the receiver antenna 26. The spacer 144 may comprise an electrically insulative material such as air, FR4, a polymeric material or a combination thereof. The shielding material 146 may comprise a ferrite material, a metal, or a combination thereof. It is noted that positioning the shielding material 146 closer to the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26, such as detailed in Examples 3 and 4, of Table I, provides an increase in electrical inductance that results in an improved mutual inductance between transmitter and receiver modules 12, 14.
As further illustrated in
In an embodiment, the transmitter module power circuit board 152 and the receiver module power circuit board 154 comprise a substrate 166 such as FR4 or printed circuit board that is substantially rigid and supports a variety of transmitter module power circuit board electrical components 162 or receiver module power circuit board electrical components 164. In an embodiment, these electrical components 162, 164 may be surface mounted to an exterior surface of the transmitter module power circuit board 152 and the receiver module power circuit board 154, respectively.
In an embodiment, the transmitter and receiver antenna assemblies 156, 158, comprises a substrate 168, such as a rigid printed circuit board or FR4 board that supports the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26. As illustrated in
In an embodiment, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the housing structure 178 comprises an electrically insulative material and acts as a spacer that separates the transmitter or receiver module assembly 172, 174 from additional shielding material that may be positioned on an exterior surface of the housing structure 178. As shown in the embodiment illustrated in
In addition, the antenna 20, 26 may be constructed having a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction in which at least one insulator is positioned between a plurality of conductors. Non-limiting examples of antennas having an MLMT construction that may be incorporated within the transmitter module 12, 148 and/or the receiver module 14, 150 may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,610,530, 8,653,927, 8,680,960, 8,692,641, 8,692,642, 8,698,590, 8,698,591, 8,707,546, 8,710,948, 8,803,649, 8,823,481, 8,823,482, 8,855,786, 8,898,885, 9,208,942, 9,232,893, 9,300,046, all to Singh et al., assigned to the assignee of the present application are incorporated fully herein. It is also noted that other antennas such as, but not limited to, an antenna configured to send and receive signals in the UHF radio wave frequency such IEEE standard 802.15.1 may be incorporated within the wireless connector system 10 of the present invention.
The wireless connector system 10 is designed to operate in an efficient, stable and reliable manner to satisfy a variety of operating and environmental conditions. The system is designed to operate in a wide range of thermal and mechanical stress environments so that data and/or electrical energy is transmitted efficiently and with minimal loss. In addition, the wireless connector system 10 is designed with a small form factor using a fabrication technology that allows for scalability, and at a cost that is amenable to developers and adopters. In addition, the wireless connector system 10 is designed to operate over a wide range of frequencies to meet the requirements of a wide range of applications.
In an embodiment the system may transmit electrical power on the order of about 100 μW to about 10 W. In another embodiment, electrical power around about 100 W may also be transmitted. Specifically considering near field magnetic coupling (NFMC) as the mechanism of wireless power transfer between the transmitter module 12, 148 and the receiver module 14, 150, it is well known that smaller sizes are generally more easily achievable if a higher operating frequency is selected. This is due to the inverse relationship of the required mutual inductance and the frequency of operation, as indicated by the following equation:
Where:
Vinduced is induced voltage on the receiver coil
Itx is the AC current flowing through the transmitter coil
ω is the operating frequency multiplied by 2π
Since the required mutual inductance increases in order to enable the wireless transfer of electrical energy having increased, it is necessary to increase the inductance or coupling of the transmitter or receiver while minimizing AC losses. Mutual inductance can be calculated by the following relationship:
M=k*√{square root over (LTx*LRx)}
M is the mutual inductance of the system
k is the coupling of the system
LTx is the inductance of the transmitter coil
LRx is the inductance of the receiver coil
As the form factor of the antenna coil is reduced, attaining the required inductance on either the receiver or transmitter is accompanied by an increase in antenna coil resistance as the high number of turns required leads to a reduction in trace width. This increase in resistance typically reduces the quality factor of the coil and overall coil to coil efficiency of the system where the Quality factor is defined as:
Where:
Where:
In an embodiment, the ferrite shield may be incorporated within the antenna structure to improve antenna performance. Selection of the ferrite shield material is dependent on the operating frequency as the complex magnetic permeability (μ=μ′−j*μ″) is frequency dependent. The material may be a sintered flexible ferrite sheet or a rigid shield and be composed of varying material compositions. Examples of materials may include, but are not limited to, zinc comprising ferrite materials such as manganese-zinc, nickel-zinc, copper-zinc, magnesium-zinc, and combinations thereof.
In addition, depending on the operating frequency and power requirements of the wireless connector system 10, a hybrid Litz wire and PCB coil antenna construction combination may be necessary to efficiently transfer power. In an embodiment, a hybrid Litz wire and PCB coil combination may comprise the transmitter antenna 20 or the receiver antenna 26 of a wrapped Litz wire construction and the other of the transmitter antenna 20 or the receiver antenna 26 may be constructed having a coil disposed on a surface of a circuit board such as the antenna shown in
In order to increase mutual inductance, the coupling and/or inductance of the transmitter module 12, 148 or the receiver module 14, 150 must be increased. However, due to the small form factor constraints, coupling is limited by the physical size of the connector modules. It is noted that using transmitter and receiver antennas 20, 26 of a construction comprising a coil disposed on the surface of a circuit board, such as the antenna shown in
In an embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 comprising a transmitter module 12, 148 having a transmitter antenna 20 of a Litz-wire construction and a shielding material and a receiver module 14, 150 having a receiver antenna 26 comprising a coil disposed on a surface of a circuit board (
The choice of coil design and construction is determined by a combination of the following electrical and magnetic parameters:
Inductance
ESR (equivalent series resistance) at operating frequency
Coupling (k)
Mutual inductance (M)
For lower operating frequencies, i.e., from about 100 kHz to about 10 MHz, and for achieving increased power transmission on the order of about 0.1 mm to about 100 mm, this particular antenna topology is beneficial. For example, per the mutual inductance equations, if the power to be delivered to a load is constant, while the operating frequency decreases, the mutual inductance between the transmitter and receiver antenna coils increases at a constant transmit current. Table II illustrates the improvement in mutual inductance. Table III illustrates the improvement in coupling and Table IV illustrates the improvement in antenna to antenna efficiency.
In addition, if the system 10 is operated at a higher frequency, i.e., on the order of about 1 MHz or greater, the required mutual inductance will be reduced, thereby allowing for smaller transmitter and receiver antennas 20, 26 and modules 12, 14, 148, 150. As defined herein shielding material is a material that captures a magnetic field. An example of which is a ferrite material. In the embodiments detailed in Tables II-IV, a sheet of ferrite material is positioned directly adjacent to the transmitter antenna 20, for example, behind the transmitter antenna 20. As defined herein a “T-Core” shielding material is a magnetic field shield assembly comprising a sheet of shielding material, such as a ferrite material, placed directly behind the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26 and an additional second shielding material, such as a ferrite material, placed within the inside area of a coil in the plane of the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26. Furthermore, the transmitter module 12, 148 or the receiver module 14, 150 may be constructed having the respective transmitter or receiver antennas 20, 26 comprising a “C-core” shielding material in which the shielding material, such as a ferrite material, configured similarly to the letter “C”, is positioned adjacent to the antenna 20, 26. In addition, the transmitter module 12, 148 or the receiver module 14,150 may be constructed having the respective transmitter or receiver antennas 20, 26 comprising a “E-core” shielding material in which the shielding material, such as a ferrite material, configured similarly to the letter “E”, is positioned adjacent to the antenna 20, 26.
In an embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 rated for a maximum 200 mW received DC power, can be configured having each transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver module 14, 150 comprise a form factor of about 11 mm×4 mm, and operate at a frequency that ranges from about 2 MHz to 30 MHz. However, this presents a key challenge in the antenna design. It is not typically cost effective, nor is it particularly reliable, to implement a wire wound Litz antenna that can fit in a footprint as small as 11 mm×4 mm. Furthermore, as the operating frequency is increased to about 6 MHz and greater, wire wound Litz antenna coils may not be suitable in terms of performance.
Utilizing relatively small sized printed circuit board or flexible printed circuit board (PCB/FPC) based coil-antennas allow for appropriate stackups, appropriate trace widths, gap widths and copper (or other conductive material) depths that are more suitable for higher frequencies. Further, printed circuit board and flex printed circuit board based coil-antennas are highly integrated into the PCB fabrication process, thereby allowing for integration with the rest of the circuitry. This also allows for the integration of MLMT antenna designs to reduce ESR and improve the Q of the antennas.
Furthermore, utilizing coils in a layered approach allows for other fabrication processes, for example, printing, printing on fabrics, semiconductor fabrication processes, such as a low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) process, a high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) process, and the like.
Small form factor PCB coil designs are suitable at higher operating frequencies due to a lower required inductance while maintaining a low coil ESR to minimize the power dissipated in the transmit and receive coils. Printed circuit board (PCB) coil antennas offer additional benefits from a manufacturing, cost and assembly standpoint compared to wire-wound antenna coil solutions. For applications with a strict requirement for overall assembly thickness, printed circuit board (PCB) coil antennas are preferred due to the reduced thickness possible even with multilayer construction.
The ferrite shield material selected for the coil combination also depends on the operating frequency as the complex magnetic permeability (μ=μ′−j*μ″) is frequency dependent. The material may be a sintered flexible ferrite sheet or a rigid shield and be composed of varying material compositions.
It is noted that the construction of the antenna 20, 26 is non-limiting. The antenna that is incorporated within a module may comprise magnetic wires or have a stamped metal construction. Furthermore, the antenna 20, 26 may utilize thick film, thin film or other printing fabrication technologies in its construction.
In an embodiment, incorporation of a transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26 having a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction significantly reduces the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the respective transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver modules 14, 150 and the wireless connector system 10 of the present invention. The inventors have discovered that incorporation of at least one transmitter and receiver antenna 20, 26 having a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction reduces equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the transmitter or receiver module 12, 14 by about 50 percent.
Furthermore, reducing ESR improves the overall system efficiency and reduces heating in the antenna 20, 26 and the system 10 by reducing the (I2×R) losses in the coil. Table V shown below details the measured ESR for two multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) antenna designs in comparison to an antenna constructed comprising Litz wire wrapped around an inductor. As shown in Table V below, the antenna constructed with an MLMT design exhibited a lower inductance, (0.60 μH) and a lower equivalent series resistance (ESR) (0.50Ω) in comparison to the antenna having a traditional wound Litz wire construction. Thus, the transmitter or receiver antenna 20, 26 having a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) construction contributes to the increased electrical performance of increased electrical power transmission and increased module separation distance 16 of the wireless connector system 10 of the present invention.
Exemplary ways of connecting the module to a host device include, but are not limited to, directly soldering or placing the at least one transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver module 14, 150 on a circuit board or a host device 22, 28. Alternatively, the at least one transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver module 14, 150 could be connected to a circuit board or a host device 22, 28 using a wire/cable. Once connected to a host device 22, 28, the full structure or at least a portion of the structure of the at least one transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver module 14, 150 may be encapsulated within an insulative coating.
In an embodiment, the operating procedure for the transmitter module 12, 148 that comprises a single antenna element may have the following operating process. In this embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 is a unidirectional power transfer system at a frequency, for example at 2.4 GHz. In an embodiment, the receiver module 14, 150 is brought in the vicinity of the transmitter module 12, 148.
In an embodiment, the receiver sensing sub-circuit 42 within the transmitter module 12, 148 detects the presence of the receiver module 14, 150. The master control unit (MCU) 44 within the transmitter module 12, 148 activates the system 10, and an identification stage is initiated. The identification stage could be important to distinguish between a spurious sense signal versus a sense signal detecting a true receiver module 14, 150. The identification could also be important to determine the specific type of the receiver module 14, 150 that would indicate to the transmitter module 12, 148 and the host device 22 what amount of power and type of data to transmit.
In an embodiment, once a positive identification of the receiver module 14, 150 is made, the transmitter module 12, 148 starts transmitting power. In an embodiment, the transmission of electrical power could cease under several conditions, including but not limited to:
It is noted that the above exemplary process is for a case when the transmitter module 12, 148 is configured as a single-purpose (only transmits) and the receiver module 14, 150 is configured as a single purpose (only receives), and there exists a single antenna element for each transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver module 14, 150. In other words, this is a unidirectional wireless power system.
In another embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 of the present application could include a module that can operate both as a transmitter and as a receiver, i.e. a transceiver. In a further embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 of the present application may comprise a power and data transfer system in addition to a single antenna where the data is modulated into the power frequency.
In another embodiment, the wireless connector system 10 of the present invention may comprise multiple antennas within each transmitter module 12, 148 and receiver modules 14, 150. If a multiple antenna system is employed, then the first antenna could be reserved for identification, diagnostics and any uni- or bi-directional data transfer, while the second antenna can be dedicated to power transfer.
In an embodiment, the reliability and repeatability of the receiver module presence sensing capability could be improved by using a calibration method, as described in the following steps.
As used herein, the phrase “at least one of” preceding a series of items, with the term “and” or “or” to separate any of the items, modifies the list as a whole, rather than each member of the list (i.e., each item). The phrase “at least one of” does not require selection of at least one of each item listed; rather, the phrase allows a meaning that includes at least one of any one of the items, and/or at least one of any combination of the items, and/or at least one of each of the items. By way of example, the phrases “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” each refer to only A, only B, or only C; any combination of A, B, and C; and/or at least one of each of A, B, and C.
The predicate words “configured to”, “operable to”, and “programmed to” do not imply any particular tangible or intangible modification of a subject, but, rather, are intended to be used interchangeably. In one or more embodiments, a processor configured to monitor and control an operation or a component may also mean the processor being programmed to monitor and control the operation or the processor being operable to monitor and control the operation. Likewise, a processor configured to execute code can be construed as a processor programmed to execute code or operable to execute code.
A phrase such as “an aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. An aspect may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as an “aspect” may refer to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as an “embodiment” does not imply that such embodiment is essential to the subject technology or that such embodiment applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an embodiment may apply to all embodiments, or one or more embodiments. An embodiment may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such an “embodiment” may refer to one or more embodiments and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A configuration may provide one or more examples of the disclosure. A phrase such as a “configuration” may refer to one or more configurations and vice versa.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” or as an “example” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “include,” “have,” or the like is used in the description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprise” as “comprise” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
Reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more. Pronouns in the masculine (e.g., his) include the feminine and neuter gender (e.g., her and its) and vice versa. Headings and subheadings, if any, are used for convenience only and do not limit the subject disclosure.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of particular implementations of the subject matter. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub combination or variation of a sub combination.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/379,940, filed on Aug. 26, 2016, the disclosure of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2911605 | Wales, Jr. | Nov 1953 | A |
2797393 | Clogston | Jun 1957 | A |
3484731 | Rich | Dec 1969 | A |
3633151 | Sensabaugh | Jan 1972 | A |
3824500 | Rothenberg | Jul 1974 | A |
4328531 | Nagashima et al. | May 1982 | A |
4494100 | Stengel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4959631 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4996165 | Change et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5137478 | Graf | Aug 1992 | A |
5237165 | Tingley, III | Aug 1993 | A |
5280645 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5281855 | Hadden et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5365247 | Van der Veen | Nov 1994 | A |
5604352 | Schuetz | Feb 1997 | A |
5713939 | Nedungadi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5748464 | Schuetz | May 1998 | A |
5767808 | Robbins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767813 | Verma et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777538 | Schuetz | Jul 1998 | A |
5801611 | Van Loenen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808587 | Shima | Sep 1998 | A |
5838154 | Morikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5883392 | Schuetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5892489 | Kanba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5980773 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
6005193 | Markel | Dec 1999 | A |
6021337 | Remillard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028568 | Asakura et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6107972 | Seward et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148821 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163307 | Kim et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6271803 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6474341 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6556101 | Tada et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6583769 | Shiroki et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6664863 | Okamoto et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6809688 | Yamada | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6897830 | Bae et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6924230 | Sun et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7046113 | Okamoto et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7113087 | Casebolt | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7205655 | Sippola | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7355558 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7563352 | Hubel | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7579835 | Schnell et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579836 | Schnell et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7688270 | Tsushima | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7713762 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728778 | Tsao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786836 | Gabara | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796094 | Mtchedlishvili et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7952365 | Narita et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8004080 | McShane | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8056819 | Rowell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118611 | Jeon | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8138924 | Sinnett | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8253278 | Cook et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8299877 | Hong et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8374545 | Menegoli et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385043 | Ng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8436780 | Schantz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452235 | Kirby | May 2013 | B2 |
8457758 | Olson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8567048 | Singh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8610530 | Singh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8618695 | Azancot et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8653927 | Singh et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8680960 | Singh et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8692641 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692642 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698590 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698591 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707546 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8710948 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8714813 | Liao | May 2014 | B2 |
8772973 | Kurs | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774712 | Sato et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803474 | Hillan et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8803631 | Manssen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8803649 | Singh et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823481 | Singh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823482 | Singh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836171 | Choi et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855786 | Derbas et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8860545 | Singh et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8892034 | McGuire et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898885 | Singh et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8901880 | Cook | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8901881 | Partovi | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8933589 | Bourilkov et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9124316 | Langer | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9178361 | Liu et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9178369 | Partovi | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9196958 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9208942 | Singh et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209636 | Yoda et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230732 | Muratov et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9231412 | Lisi et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9252846 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9252876 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9318897 | Brohlin et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9425653 | Cook et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9432090 | Wang | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9515633 | Long et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9525311 | Menegoli | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9559526 | Von Novak, III et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9866040 | Kato | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9912173 | Tseng | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9912174 | Soar | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10283995 | Gunderson | May 2019 | B2 |
20020020554 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020053992 | Kawakami et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071003 | Kimura | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075191 | Yokoshima | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101383 | Junod | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030006069 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030058180 | Forster | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030119677 | Qiyan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142929 | Bartur et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146875 | Kirino | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040000974 | Ordenaal et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040085247 | Mickle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108311 | de Rooij | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118920 | He | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140528 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159460 | Passiopoulos et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189528 | Killen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196605 | Dinn et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217488 | Luechinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227608 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050043638 | Chen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050121229 | Takai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174628 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050269693 | Green | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022772 | Kanno et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040628 | Porret | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060192645 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060284718 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018767 | Gabara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020969 | Yungers | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023424 | Weber | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045773 | Mi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046544 | Murofushi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080810 | Juds | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095913 | Takahashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120629 | Schnell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070139275 | Deaett et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179570 | De Taboada | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182367 | Partovi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267718 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279287 | Castaneda | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039332 | Bernstein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055178 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062066 | Arai | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080067874 | Tseng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080150693 | You | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164840 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164844 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164960 | Schnell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169910 | Greene et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205495 | Trott | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211320 | Cook et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080277386 | Haimer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278399 | Nakajima et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283277 | Muramatsu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303735 | Fujimoto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090015266 | Narita et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058189 | Cook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079387 | Jin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079628 | Rofougaran | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085706 | Baarman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096413 | Partovi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108974 | Raggam et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134875 | Tomiha et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140691 | Jung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152542 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090197435 | Jessup et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230777 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090261778 | Kook | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261936 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271048 | Wakamatsu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100007215 | Sakuma | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033290 | Liu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100072588 | Yang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100127660 | Cook et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141042 | Kesler | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100144308 | Jin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164296 | Kurs et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201310 | Vorenkamp et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219694 | Kurs et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100289599 | Vangala | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289709 | Guan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295701 | Denis | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110084656 | Gao | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101788 | Sun et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127951 | Walley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137379 | Wosmek | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110181484 | Pettus et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205315 | Saga | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212691 | Rott et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110024510 | Kato et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110241437 | Kanno | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248891 | Han et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279198 | Haner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291613 | Rosik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038317 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120062345 | Kurs et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095531 | Derbas et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120169434 | Masuda et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120170337 | Lisi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120217819 | Yamakawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223589 | Low et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120223590 | Low et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235500 | Ganem et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235634 | Hall et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235636 | Partovi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120248887 | Kesler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249396 | Parsche | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256494 | Kesler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262109 | Toya | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274148 | Sung | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280765 | Kurs et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293011 | Byun et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305792 | Kuwabara et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313579 | Matsumoto | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120315772 | Joschika | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323512 | Rhodin | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326524 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326931 | Murayama et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130015718 | Jung | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130067737 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067738 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068499 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068507 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130069748 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130069749 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130069750 | Singh | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130069843 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076154 | Baarman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093629 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099734 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101133 | Yoon et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130140900 | Yu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130146671 | Grieshofer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147427 | Polu | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154557 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169060 | Jung et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181535 | Muratov et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130199027 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130199028 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200070 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200722 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200968 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200969 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200976 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201589 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205582 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207744 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208389 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208390 | Singh | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234899 | Pope et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257362 | Lim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257670 | Sovero et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285605 | Partovi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293028 | Byun | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300207 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130335284 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140008974 | Miyamoto | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009110 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015330 | Byun et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028111 | Hansen | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035383 | Riehl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140035793 | Kato | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041218 | Singh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047713 | Singh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140084946 | Clark et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140162554 | Sankar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168019 | Hirobe | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140183971 | Endo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140184334 | Nobbe et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197694 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203661 | Dayan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226795 | Kitano | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231518 | Yosui | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253052 | Goma | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266019 | Pigott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266624 | Van Bosch et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302782 | Raab | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140306548 | Yang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312242 | Valentino et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319921 | Lisi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361628 | Keeling | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150054455 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150070190 | Wai Fong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076922 | Kato et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091502 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115727 | Carobolante et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150136858 | Finn | May 2015 | A1 |
20150137746 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140807 | Mohammed | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145634 | Kurz | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145635 | Kurz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150180440 | Ishizuka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150200445 | Murphy | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207541 | Kuroda | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234035 | Lohoefener et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236545 | Song | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236550 | Yang et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249359 | Gunderson | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150255994 | Kesler et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150280322 | Saito | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150290379 | Rudser | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318710 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349110 | Kocon | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349541 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150351292 | Chang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150357827 | Muratov et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372493 | Sankar | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001663 | Chae et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160013565 | Ortiz | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028265 | Bell et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036244 | Griffith | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049826 | Lee et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160056639 | Mao | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160056664 | Partovi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160064952 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072306 | Tsuda et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105963 | Isom | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160111889 | Jeong | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160118711 | Finn | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160126002 | Chien et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149416 | Ha et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156103 | Bae | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160156215 | Bae | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165323 | Hollis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183034 | Konanur et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183056 | Leabman | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197513 | Uchimoto et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160224975 | Na | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160254679 | Liu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160264007 | Haase | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160285321 | Akuzawa et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160325105 | Etzkorn | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160330823 | Hwa et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170025900 | Amari et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170033610 | Borin | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170033613 | Takahashi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170040846 | Sankar | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070249 | Irish et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093198 | Graham | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093222 | Joye | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170111243 | Bell | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170117755 | Muratov et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170126069 | Martin | May 2017 | A1 |
20170126544 | Vigneras et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170222466 | Sankar | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240007 | Chuang | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256956 | Irish et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170346343 | Atasoy et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170357338 | Bell | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170372837 | Lee et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180013307 | Pudipeddi | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180043861 | Kosugi | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180054090 | Von Novak, III | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180062433 | Singh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062436 | Singh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062438 | Singh | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062439 | Singh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062704 | Singh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180083669 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180131231 | Nakano et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180166921 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167107 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167108 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167109 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167110 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180168057 | Peralta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180212649 | Tenno | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219428 | Bae | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180315968 | Koyama et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180339599 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190027969 | Staring | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190052116 | Bae | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190140699 | Park | May 2019 | A1 |
20190154448 | Cao | May 2019 | A1 |
20190222060 | Leem | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190363545 | Lee et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2650300 | Oct 2004 | CN |
201150058 | Nov 2008 | CN |
203396791 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103944196 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104037493 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104037494 | Sep 2014 | CN |
0310396 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0972268 | May 2002 | EP |
1609503 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2031729 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2420953 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2557630 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2775564 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2775565 | Sep 2014 | EP |
1-310518 | Dec 1989 | JP |
5-83249 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H0583249 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H08237021 | Sep 1996 | JP |
09-093005 | Apr 1997 | JP |
10-255629 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2007-7042569 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008-160781 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-205215 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-307114 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008-924285 | Dec 2008 | JP |
4329932 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2001344574 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-147408 | Aug 2012 | JP |
2013-93429 | May 2013 | JP |
2014-175864 | Sep 2014 | JP |
2014-175865 | Sep 2014 | JP |
10-1216946 | Jan 2013 | KR |
10-2013-0015618 | Feb 2013 | KR |
10-2014-0111554 | Sep 2014 | KR |
10-2014-0111794 | Sep 2014 | KR |
2014-0135357 | Nov 2014 | KR |
10-1559939 | Oct 2015 | KR |
10-2010-0092741 | Aug 2018 | KR |
201436494 | Sep 2014 | TW |
2014436495 | Sep 2014 | TW |
I478461 | Mar 2015 | TW |
2008050917 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2010104569 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010129369 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO -2012132242 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2014014425 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015158500 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (2 pages). |
Decision of Dismissal of Amendment issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated May 8, 2018 (7 pages). |
Office Action issued Apr. 27, 2018 in corresponding TW Application No. 102108345 (11 pages). |
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049 (5 pages). |
Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8 (9 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0026135 (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0025858 (12 pages). |
Written Opinion and International Search Report issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/065329 dated Feb. 21, 2018 (7 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048 dated Dec. 12, 2017 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2017/048708 dated Nov. 8, 2017 (10 pages). |
EP Office Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Jan. 17, 2019 for EP App. No. 13001121.6-1216. |
EP Communication pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC regarding partial supplementary European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated Feb. 14, 2019, 20 pages. |
Muratov, V., Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless charging, Mediatek, Inc., Nov. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
Qi 2010, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1, Oct. 2010, Wireless Power Consortium, 86 pages. |
Narayanan, R., “Wireless Power Charging Coil Changing Considerations”, Wurth Elektronik, Feb. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
Barcelo, T., “Wireless Power User Guide”, Linear Technology, Application Note 138, Oct. 2013, 8 pages. |
Yoon, Y., “Embedded conductor technology for micromachined RF elements”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Jun. 2005, 11 pages. |
Burghartz, J., “On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 718-729. |
Qi 2009, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Version 0.95, Jul. 2009, 76 pages. |
Lee, Y., “Antenna Circuit Design for RFID Applications”, 2003 Microchip Technology, AN710, 50 pages. |
Sun, M., et al., “Apparatus for Wireless Power and Data Transfer Over a Distance”, University of Pittsburgh, Jun. 2009, 30 pages. |
IPR2019-00858—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., 90 pages. |
IPR2019-00858—Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960. |
IPR2019-00858—Ex 1004—File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960. |
Ex. 1002 Declaration of Dr. Steven Leeb, 115 pages. |
Ex. 1003—CV of Dr. Steven B. Leeb, 7 pages. |
Ex. 1005—US20070267718A1 to Lee, 13 pages. |
Ex. 1006—Semat—Physics Chapters 29-32, 81 pages, (1958). |
Ex 1009—US20090096413 to Partovi, 88 pages. |
Ex 1010—IEEE Dictionary 1996 (excerpt), 9 pages. |
Ex. 1011—US20070089773A1 to Koester et al., 26 pages. |
Ex. 1012—US20120280765 to Kurs, 122 pages. |
Ex. 1013—U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,497 to Bunyan, 12 pages. |
Ex. 1014 U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,842 to Cheung et al., 8 pages. |
Ex. 1015 Reinhold—Efficient Antenna Design of Inductive Coupled RFID—Systems with High Power Demand, Journal of Communication vol. 2, No. 6, Nov. 2007, 10 pages. |
Ex. 1016 U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,042 to Akiba et al., 8 pages. |
Ex. 1017—U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,344 to Balakrishnan, 12 pages. |
Ex. 1018—Wheeler, Formulas for the Skin (1942), 13 pages. |
Ex. 1019—Kyriazidou—7236080, 12 pages. |
Ex. 1020 Alldred et al., “A 1.2 V, 60 Ghz radio receiver with onchip transformers and inductors in 90 nm CMOS,” Proc. IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuits SYmp., pp. 51-54, Nov. 2006 (“Alldred”), 12 pages. |
Ex. 1022 U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 to Tseng, 31 pages. |
Ex. 1023 U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,138 to Chiang, 18 pages. |
Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,958 to Yerman et al., 20 pages. |
Ex. 1025—US20070126544—Wotherspoon, 6 pages. |
Ex. 1028—U.S. Pat. No. 9,820,374 to Bois et al., 9 pages. |
Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,919 to Phan et al., 14 pages. |
Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,825 to Wojnarowski et al., 10 pages. |
Ex. 1031 Ahn 7305725, 9 pages. |
Ex. 1032—U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,331 to Shamouilian et al., 23 pages. |
Ex. 1033—Hu, et al., “AC Resistance to Planar Power Inductors and the Quasidistributed Gap Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 2001 (“Hu”), 13 pages. |
Ex. 1034—U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,363 to Fazelpour, 8 pages. |
Ex. 1035—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1036 Kraemer et al., “Architecture Considerations for 60 GhzPulse Transceiver Front-Ends,” CAS 2007 Proceedings vol. 2, 2007, Int'l Semiconductor Conference (2007), 26 pages. |
Ex. 1037—Varonen et al., “V-band Balanced Resistive Mixer in 65-nm CMOS,” Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Circuits Conference (2007), 22 pages. |
Ex. 1038—IEEE Xplore web page, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1039—Lopera et al., “A Multiwinding Modeling Method for High Frequency Transformers and Inductors”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, No. 3, May 2003, 14 pages. |
Ex. 1040—Leonavicius et al., “Comparison of Realization Techniques for PFC Inductor Operating in Discontinuous Conduction Mode,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 2, Mar. 2004, 14 pages. |
Ex. 1041—Roshen, W.A., “Fringing Field Formulas and Winding Loss Due to an Air Gap,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 2007, 12 pages. |
IPR2019-00859—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 87 pages. |
Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 322 pages (in two attachments A and B) due to size. |
IPR2019-00860—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, 86 pages. |
Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 868,960 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
Ex 1004—File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, 201 pages. (in two attachments due to size). |
IPR2019-00861—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, 89 pages. |
IPR2019-00862—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948, 88 pages. |
Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 50 pages. |
Ex. 1004 File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., 213 pages. |
IPR2019-0863 Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 89 pages. |
Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 49 pages. |
Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, 180 pages. |
EP Communication pursuant to Rule 62 EPC regarding extended European Search Report for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212 dated May 15, 2019, 16 pages. |
Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR App. No. 10-2013-0025858 dated May 14, 2019, with English Translation, 8 pages. |
Notification of Decision of Rejection for KR 10-2013-0026135 dated May 14, 2019, 8 pages with translation. |
EP Communication of extended European Search Report for EP 19154162.2 dated Jun. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2013 for EP Appln. No. 13001121.6 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2013 for EP Appln. No. 13001130.7 (6 pages). |
European Search Report dated Aug. 7, 2014 for EP Appln. No. 10751119.8 (12 pages). |
European Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2014 for EP Appln. No. 14000885.5 (8 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Appln. No. 13.001 121.6 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Appln. No. 13.001 130.7 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017 in corresponding JP Appln. No. 2013-047049 (5 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017 in corresponding EP Appln. No. 1400885.5 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017 in corresponding TW Appln. No. 102108342 (10 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 in corresponding JP Appln. 2013-047048 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2016 for PCT/US2016/045588 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2016 for PCT/US2016/047607 (9 pages). |
Relative Permittivity—Dielectric Constant—Jul. 2011 (3 pages). |
First Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201680058731.9 dated Aug. 5, 2019, English Translation, 6 pages. |
Extended Search Report for EP 19188841.1-1216 dated Sep. 10, 2019, 11 pages. |
Exhibit A-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) By Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 56 pages. |
ExhibitA-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs '694”), 59 pages. |
Exhibit A-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”). 86 pages. |
Exhibit A-04: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 51 pages. |
Exhibit A-05: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit A-06: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 80 pages. |
Exhibit A-07: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 82 pages. |
Exhibit A-08: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit A-09: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 53 pages. |
Exhibit A-10: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 46 pages. |
Exhibit A-11: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 82 pages. |
Exhibit A-12: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 43 pages. |
Exhibit A-13: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit A-14: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 35 pages. |
Exhibit A-15: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 40 pages. |
Exhibit A-16: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 59 pages. |
Exhibit A-17: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit A-18: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit A-19: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 58 pages. |
Exhibit A-20: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 49 pages. |
Exhibit A-21: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 45 pages. |
Exhibit A-22: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 64 pages. |
Exhibit A-23: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Qi 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 26 pages. |
Exhibit A-24: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 49 pages. |
Exhibit A-25: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), 87 pages. |
Exhibit A-26: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 65 pages. |
Exhibit A-27: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), 67 pages. |
Exhibit A-28: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit A-29: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 40 pages. |
Exhibit A-30: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology For Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 43 pages. |
Exhibit A-31: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 154 pages. |
Exhibit A-32: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by the LG G2, 462 pages. |
Exhibit A-33: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by the LG G3, 228 pages. |
Exhibit A-34: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 391 pages. |
Exhibit B-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit B-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs '694”), 51 pages. |
Exhibit B-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 76 pages. |
Exhibit B-04: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 44 pages. |
Exhibit B-05: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 42 pages. |
Exhibit B-06: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 71 pages. |
Exhibit B-07: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 45 pages. |
Exhibit B-08: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 75 pages. |
Exhibit B-09: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 33 pages. |
Exhibit B-10: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 42 pages. |
Exhibit B-11: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 69 pages. |
Exhibit B-12: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit B-13: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 33 pages. |
Exhibit B-14: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 32 pages. |
Exhibit B-15: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit B-16: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Inventor Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 53 pages. |
Exhibit C-33: Invalidity Contentions: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G3 NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the LG G3, 266 pages. |
Exhibit C-34: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 468 pages. |
Exhibit D-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 54 pages. |
Exhibit D-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs”), 59 pages. |
Exhibit D-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 77 pages. |
Exhibit D-04: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 52 pages. |
Exhibit D-05: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Baarman, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“David W. Baarman”), 52 pages. |
Exhibit D-06: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 82 pages. |
Exhibit D-07: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 52 pages. |
Exhibit D-08: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 92 pages. |
Exhibit D-09: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 44 pages. |
Exhibit D-10: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru '215”), 46 pages. |
Exhibit D-11: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit D-12: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 78 pages. |
Exhibit D-13: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 38 pages. |
Exhibit D-14: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 34 pages. |
Exhibit D-15: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit D-16: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit D-17: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit D-18: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 34 pages. |
Exhibit D-19: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 56 pages. |
Exhibit D-20: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 51 pages. |
Exhibit D-21: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 51 pages. |
Exhibit D-22: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 67 pages. |
Exhibit D-23: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Qi 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 28 pages. |
Exhibit D-24: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 55 pages. |
Exhibit D-25: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), 94 pages. |
Exhibit D-26: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 63 pages. |
Exhibit D-27: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), 75 pages. |
Exhibit D-28: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 73 pages. |
Exhibit D-29: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 42 pages. |
Exhibit D-30: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology For Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 41 pages. |
Exhibit D-31—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 168 pages. |
Exhibit D-32: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the LG G2, 511 pages. |
Exhibit D-33—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the LG G3, 249 pages. |
Exhibit D-34—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 434 pages. |
Exhibit E-01: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Ha, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2016/0149416 (“Ha”), 99 pages. |
Exhibit E-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication 2014/0035383 (“Riehl”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit E-03 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '154, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0076154 (“Baarman '154”), 42 pages. |
Exhibit E-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729Patent in View of Kanno, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication 2011/0241437 (“Kanno”), 30 pages. |
Exhibit E-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kazuya, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2013093429 (“Kazuya”), 32 pages. |
Exhibit E-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0357827 (“Muratov”), 35 pages. |
Exhibit E-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Sung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2012/0274148 (“Sung”), 27 pages. |
Exhibit E-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '635, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '635”), 133 pages. |
Exhibit E-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '634, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '634”), 122 pages. |
Exhibit E-10: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '746, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0137746 (“Lee '746”), 34 pages. |
Exhibit E-11: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Mukherjee, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0091502 (“Mukherjee”), 32 pages. |
Exhibit E-12: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Asanuma, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0197694 (“Asanuma”), 24 pages. |
Exhibit E-13: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2014/0008974 (“Takashi”), 77 pages. |
Exhibit E-14: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Korean Patent Publication No. 20130015618 (“Hoon”), 28 pages. |
Ex. 1008—U.S. Publication 2012/0274148 to Sung et al., 13 pages. |
Ex. 1009—JP Patent No. 2013-93429 to Kazuya, 27 pages. |
Ex. 1010—U.S. Pub. No. 2015/0091502 to Mukherjee et al., 7 pages. |
Ex. 1011—KR Patent No. 10-2013-0045307 to Yu, 45 pages. |
Ex. 1012—IEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques, New York, NY 1953, 17 pages. |
Ex. 1013—Asa et al., A Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers, 6 pages. |
Ex. 1014—Abstract of A Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers, IEEE XPlore Digital Library, 2 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex.1015—Wotherspoon—US 2007/0126544, 6 pages. |
PGR2019-00049—Petition for Post-Grant Review re U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 112 pages. |
Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 48 pages. |
PGR2019-00049—Ex. 1002—Declaration of Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 141 pages. |
Ex. 1003—CV of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E., 34 pages. |
Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 1, 475 pages. |
Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 2, 475 pages. |
Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 3, 438 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 73 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1002 Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In Support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, 42 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1005 U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 to Peralta et al., 48 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 1, 200 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 2, 200 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 3, 200 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 4, 200 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1008—First Amended Complaint for NuCurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case. No. 6:18-cv-00051-JRG-KNM, 62 pages. |
PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1009—NuCurrent's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Case. No. 1:19-CV-00798-DLC, 31 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for EP Application No. 17879649.6-1202 dated Dec. 17, 2019. |
Exhibit B-17: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit B-18: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), 33 pages. |
Exhibit B-19: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 Al (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 51 pages. |
Exhibit B-20: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit B-21: Invalidity Contentions '046 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit B-22: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 55 pages. |
Exhibit B-23: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Qi 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 23 pages. |
Exhibit B-24: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 44 pages. |
Exhibit B-25: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), 76 pages. |
Exhibit B-26: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 55 pages. |
Exhibit B-27: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), 62 pages. |
Exhibit B-28: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit B-29: Invalidity Contentions: '046Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 36 pages. |
Exhibit B-30: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology For Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit B-31: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 135 pages. |
Exhibit B-32: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G2, 401 pages. |
Exhibit B-33: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G3, 200 pages. |
Exhibit B-34: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, 340 pages. |
Exhibit C-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), 59 pages. |
Exhibit C-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs '694”), 61 pages. |
Exhibit C-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), 84 pages. |
Exhibit C-04: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), 58 pages. |
Exhibit C-05: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit C-06: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), 61 pages. |
Exhibit C-07:Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), 98 pages. |
Exhibit C-08: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), 49 pages. |
Exhibit C-09: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa'215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), 50 pages. |
Exhibit C-10: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), 85 pages. |
Exhibit C-11: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa'631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,631 A (“Hasegawa'631”), 40 pages. |
Exhibit C-12: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), 40 pages. |
Exhibit C-13: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 35 pages. |
Exhibit C-14: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit C-15: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura ”), 52 pages. |
Exhibit C-16: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), 61 pages. |
Exhibit C-17: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Misum, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misum Shuichi”), 37 pages. |
Exhibit C-18: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), 59 pages. |
Exhibit C-19: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), 55 pages. |
Exhibit C-20: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Afshin Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), 56 pages. |
Exhibit C-21: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), 77 pages. |
Exhibit C-22: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Qi 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), 29 pages. |
Exhibit C-23: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit C-24: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), 102 pages. |
Exhibit C-25: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), 68 pages. |
Exhibit C-26: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), 84 pages. |
Exhibit C-27: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), 81 pages. |
Exhibit C-28: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), 46 pages. |
Exhibit C-29: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yoon &Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology For Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), 14 pages. |
Exhibit C-30: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), 88 pages. |
Exhibit C-31: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, 180 pages. |
Exhibit C-32: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the LG G2, 557 pages. |
Exhibit E-15 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '710, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0318710 (“Lee '710”), 42 pages. |
Exhibit E-16: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hisanori, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Publication No. 2012-147408 (“Hisanori”), 45 pages. |
Exhibit E-17: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov Presentation, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a Bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless Charging, presented by Vladimir Muratov (“Muratov Presentation”), 57 pages. |
Exhibit E-18: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Han, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2017/0353055 A1 (“Han”), 46 pages. |
Exhibit E-19: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl IEEE, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Wireless Power Systems for Mobile Devices Supporting Inductive and Resonant Operating Modes, by Patrick S. Riehl et al., IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, No. 3, Mar. 3, 2015 (Riehl IEEE), 56 pages. |
Exhibit F-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 34 pages. |
Exhibit F-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 58 pages. |
Exhibit F-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“the '960 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 30 pages. |
Exhibit G-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 33 pages. |
Exhibit G-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 49 pages. |
Exhibit G-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 26 pages. |
Exhibit H-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 43 pages. |
Exhibit H-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 88 pages. |
Exhibit H-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 49 pages. |
Exhibit I-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), 39 pages. |
Exhibit I-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), 78 pages. |
Exhibit I-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), 43 pages. |
Exhibit J-01 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Satoshi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Publication No. 2001-344574 (“Satoshi”), 19 pages. |
Exhibit J-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takahashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2007/0095913 (“Takahashi”), 23 pages. |
Exhibit J-03: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '953, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0259953 (“Baarman '953”), 31 pages. |
Exhibit J-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Carobolante, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0115727 (“Carobolante”), 12 pages. |
Exhibit J-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2016/0156103 (“Bae”), 6 pages. |
Exhibit J-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Singh, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“Singh”), 3 pages. |
Exhibit J-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), 14 pages. |
Exhibit J-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Narayanan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Application Note: Wireless Power Charging Coil Considerations, by Raghu Narayanan, Würth Elektronik (“Narayanan”), 6 pages. |
Exhibit J-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Barcelo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“the '729 Patent”) by Application Note 138: Wireless Power User Guide, by Trevor Barcelo, Linear Technology (“Barcelo”), 4 pages. |
Exhibit K: Family Patents Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), 103 pages. |
Exhibit L: '729 Patent Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), 106 pages. |
Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review of IPR2019-0858, 44 pages. |
IPR2019-00858, Exhibit 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
IPR2019-00859—Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, 48 pages. |
IPR2019-00859—Ex. 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
IPR2019-00860—Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 B2, 6 pages. |
IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1042, Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 15 pages. |
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, 6 pages. |
Decision Granting of Inter Partes Review Case IPR2019-00862 re U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 B2, 41 pages. |
IPR2019-00862 Exhibit 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary injunction. |
IPR2019-00863 Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 B2, 42 pages. |
IPR2019-00863—Ex. 1002 Corrected Leeb Declaration. |
IPR2019-01217—Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 90 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 48 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1002—Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E., In Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, 143 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1003—CV of R. Jacob Baker, 35 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 1, 330 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 2, 430 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 3, 230 pages. |
IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004—U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 4, 299 pages. |
Ex. 1005—U.S. Publication 2014-0035383 to Riehl, 11 pages. |
Ex. 1006—Riehl IEEE Transactions on Microwave Therory and Techniques, Mar. 2015, vol. 63, No. 3, 17 pages. |
Ex. 1007 U.S. Publication 2011/0241437 to Kanno, 21 pages. |
CN Office Action, CN Application No. 201780060807.6 dated Mar. 4, 2020, 18 pages. |
International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 7, 2019, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/048708, filed Aug. 25, 2017, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180062397 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62379940 | Aug 2016 | US |