This application relates generally to x-ray spectroscopy systems, and more particularly, to x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) systems.
X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) is a chemical speciation technique commonly employed at high brightness synchrotron light sources, but its application has been limited in laboratory systems due to the low brightness of laboratory x-ray sources and low spectral resolution of such systems which limit throughput. In attempts to overcome this deficiency, several academic groups have explored building x-ray emission spectroscopy systems using curved mosaic crystal analyzers in a von Hamos geometry for parallel detection of multiple x-ray energies.
In certain embodiments, a system for x-ray emission spectroscopy is provided. The system comprises a mount configured to hold a sample, at least one x-ray source, and at least one x-ray optical train configured to focus x-rays from the at least one x-ray source to a focal spot and to irradiate a first side of the sample with the focused x-rays. The system further comprises at least one x-ray analyzer curved in at least one plane, the at least one x-ray analyzer configured to receive fluorescence x-rays emitted from the first side of the sample. The system further comprises at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector, wherein the focal spot, the at least one x-ray analyzer, and the at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector are positioned in an off-Rowland circle geometry.
In certain embodiments, an x-ray spectrometer is provided. The spectrometer comprises at least one x-ray optical train configured to receive fluorescence x-rays emitted from a sample impinged by electrons within an electron microscope and to focus at least some of the received fluorescence x-rays to a focal spot. The spectrometer further comprises at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector and at least one x-ray analyzer curved in at least one plane. The at least one x-ray analyzer is configured to receive and diffract at least some of the focused fluorescence x-rays with x-rays of different wavelengths diffracted to different locations on the at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector. The at least one x-ray analyzer and the at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector are positioned on a Rowland circle.
In certain embodiments, a method for x-ray emission spectroscopy is provided. The method comprises irradiating a first side of a sample with a focused x-ray beam having a focal spot. The method further comprises receiving fluorescence x-rays emitted from the first side of the sample. The method further comprises diffracting, using at least one x-ray analyzer, at least some of the received fluorescence x-rays. Fluorescence x-rays with different wavelengths are diffracted towards different portions of at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector, wherein the focal spot, the at least one x-ray analyzer, and the at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector are positioned in an off-Rowland circle geometry.
In certain embodiments, a method for x-ray emission spectroscopy is provided. The method comprises receiving fluorescence x-rays emitted from a sample impinged by electrons within an electron microscope. The method further comprises focusing at least some of the received fluorescence x-rays to a focal spot. The method further comprises diffracting, using at least one x-ray analyzer, at least some of the focused fluorescence x-rays. Fluorescence x-rays with different wavelengths are diffracted towards different portions of at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector. The at least one x-ray analyzer and the at least one spatially-resolving x-ray detector are positioned on a Rowland circle.
Certain embodiments described provide an x-ray spectroscopy system (e.g., an x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) system) that employs at least one focusing x-ray optic, at least one x-ray analyzer, and at least one x-ray detector. In certain such embodiments, the focusing x-ray optic has an energy bandwidth greater than 10 eV and is configured to collect x-rays (e.g., from an x-ray source; from a sample emitting x-rays) and to focus at least a portion of the collected x-rays to a focal spot (e.g., on or in a sample; on an x-ray detector), the focal spot having a size (e.g., width; diameter) of less than or equal to 500 microns (e.g., less than or equal to 200 microns; less than or equal to 100 microns; less than or equal to 50 microns). The focal spot can serve as a source of diverging x-rays. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray optic comprises a capillary x-ray optic having an interior reflecting surface with a shape of a portion of a quadric surface and with a focal spot having a width (e.g., diameter) less than 15 microns. In certain embodiments, the focal spot serves as a source of x-rays of a Rowland circle single crystal or mosaic crystal spectrometer. Various embodiments described herein utilize a variety of x-ray materials and optical elements to provide a variety of x-ray bandwidth ranges suitable for a variety of x-ray spectroscopy applications.
Certain embodiments described herein provide an x-ray spectroscopy system that utilizes curved single crystal or mosaic crystal x-ray analyzers for parallel detection in conjunction with focusing x-ray optics, which provide secondary source points that enable substantially higher efficiency and which enable operation of laboratory x-ray sources at higher accelerating voltages for improved x-ray brightness. Certain embodiments advantageously provide a spectrometer system configured to perform XES measurements at high throughput and/or high spectral resolution. For example, the x-ray spectrometer system can be advantageously configured to provide fast XES measurements of high concentrations of one or more atomic elements within the sample (e.g., less than 10 minutes; less than 5 minutes; less than 2 minutes) and/or to provide highly sensitive XES measurements of low concentrations of one or more atomic elements within the sample (e.g., less than 5%, less than 2%, less than 1%).
In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 is configured to perform x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) and/or x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XFS) from a variety of samples (e.g., thin films with nanometer-scale thicknesses). For example, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 can be optimized for analysis of the Kβ lines (e.g., Kβ1, Kβ2, Kβ3, Kβ5) of transition metal elements or for analysis of Lβ lines of various elements. Certain such embodiments can be applied to a number of applications, including but not limited to: thin film analysis, in situ characterization of materials, or in operando measurements of batteries and other devices. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 is configured for use in high volume manufacturing environments or for semiconductor inspection.
In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometry (XES) system is an attachment to an electron microscope (e.g., encased in a vacuum housing). In certain such embodiments, the focal spot of the at least one x-ray optic enables operation of the XES system at large Bragg angles θ (e.g., greater than 60 degrees). In certain embodiments, the XES system is relatively compact (e.g., less than 12 cm in length) and is configured to achieve high peak resolution. In contrast to conventional electron microscope attachments (e.g., in which the x-ray source irradiates the sample within the electron microscope), certain embodiments described herein are advantageously able to achieve large Bragg angles θ for better spectral resolution. Such large Bragg angles θ are generally unavailable with conventional systems due to the practical space restrictions for wavelength dispersive spectrometers for electron microscopes (e.g., less than 16 cm).
Certain embodiments described herein provide an x-ray emission spectrometer (XES) that comprises an x-ray source, an x-ray optical train, and a Rowland circle geometry single crystal or mosaic crystal spectrometer. The x-ray source is configured to produce x-rays that are collected by the x-ray optical train which is configured to focus the x-rays onto an object to be examined (e.g., the sample) such that the focal spot (e.g., having a width of less than 15 microns) on the sample produces fluorescence x-rays. The focal spot is placed within a Rowland circle such that the sample's fluorescence x-rays are collected and dispersed by a curved single crystal or mosaic crystal toward a spatially-resolving x-ray detector to collect a bandwidth of x-ray energies simultaneously (e.g., parallel detection). In certain embodiments, a mount is configured to position the crystal spectrometer components relative to each other to enable incremental increases in the x-ray bandwidths which provide XES information.
In certain embodiments, a sample mount is configured to move the sample from within the Rowland circle toward the boundary of the Rowland circle as the x-ray energies are incremented, thereby enabling higher spectral resolution and greater efficiency for single x-ray energies (e.g., for determining weak emission lines such as valence-to-core (VtC) characteristic lines). In certain embodiments, the sample is translated in the plane perpendicular with respect to the x-ray beam for 2-D “mapping” by collecting the x-ray transmission spectrum. In certain embodiments, the sample is rotated about an axis, with or without translation, for 3D tomography by collecting the x-ray transmission spectrum.
X-Ray Source
As schematically illustrated by
In certain other embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 110 comprises at least one target 200 comprising a plurality of x-ray generating structures 210 (e.g., microstructures; stripes sputtered onto a substrate 220; wires brazed onto a substrate 220) comprising different x-ray generating materials in close thermal contact with at least one thermally conductive target substrate 220 (e.g., having a thermal conductivity greater than 100 W/mC at room temperature; diamond; copper). Various example x-ray sources 80 comprising at least one target 200 comprising a plurality of structures 210 compatible with certain embodiments described herein have been described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,390,881, 9,543,109, and U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. Nos. 2016/0351370 and 2019/0011379, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In addition, the at least one x-ray source 110 of certain embodiments can include various features (e.g., active cooling systems comprising channels that carry liquid near or into the at least one target microstructure 210 to remove heat).
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 110 further comprises at least one target 200 comprising at least one target substrate 220 and one or more x-ray generating structures 210 comprising one or more x-ray generating materials in close thermal contact with the at least one target substrate 220. The at least one target substrate 220 is mounted to at least one target support 32 and is electrically connected by the opposite high voltage electrical lead 22 to be at ground or at a positive voltage relative to the at least one electron emitter 11, thus serving as an anode. The electrons of the electron beam 111 accelerate towards the at least one target 200 and collide with the at least one target 200 at high energy, with the energy of the electrons determined by the magnitude of the accelerating voltage (e.g., the voltage difference between the cathode and the anode). The collision of the electrons 111 into the at least one target 200 induces several effects, including the radiation of x-rays 230, some of which exit the vacuum chamber 20 and are transmitted through a window 40 transmissive to x-rays. In certain embodiments, the dimensions of the x-ray generating material and/or the focused electron beam 111 are such that the effective x-ray source spot size (e.g., width; diameter) is less than or equal to 50 microns. In certain embodiments, the window 40 is configured to allow at least some of the generated x-rays to be emitted from the x-ray source 110. For example, the window 40 (e.g., sheet or layer of aluminum) can be configured to filter the emitted x-rays by attenuating lower-energy x-rays while not appreciably affecting higher-energy x-rays.
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 110 further comprises an electron control system 70 (e.g., an electrostatic lens system or other system of electron optics in operative communication to a controller 72 by an additional electrical lead 27). The electron control system 70 is configured to control aspects of the electron beam 111 (e.g., direction; focus; spot size; electron flux; accelerating voltage) such that the electron beam 111 can be scanned, focused, de-focused, or otherwise directed onto the at least one target 200 (e.g., selected portions of the at least one target 200 comprising the one or more x-ray generating structures 210).
In certain embodiments, one or more of the x-ray generating materials of the target 200 are selected from the group consisting of: Ti, Al, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mo, Rh, Co, W, Pt, Ag, and Au, and alloys that include one or more of these elements. In certain embodiments, two or more of the structures 210 comprises different x-ray generating materials from one another, allowing each structure 210 to generate x-rays with different spectra. For example, two or more of the structures 210 can comprise x-ray generating materials with different characteristic lines (e.g., Rh with a characteristic Lα line of 2.7 keV; Ti with a characteristic Kα line of 4.51 keV; Cr with a characteristic Kα line of 5.4 keV; Mo; W; Au). In certain other embodiments, two or more of the structures 210 comprise the same x-ray generating material (e.g., to provide a longer use or lifetime of the system). In certain embodiments, the at least one structure 210 is in close thermal contact with the thermally conductive substrate 220 (e.g., by sputtering multiple materials upon the substrate 220 or by brazing multiple wire structures onto the surface of the substrate 220). In certain embodiments, the at least one structure 210 further comprises one or more layers 240 between the x-ray generating material and the substrate 220. For example, these layers 240 can comprise a diffusion-inhibiting material (e.g. Ta), a material configured to improve adhesion of the structure 210 to the substrate 220, and/or a material configured to improve the thermal conductance between the structure 210 and the substrate 220 (e.g. Cr between Cu and diamond). In certain embodiments, the at least one structure 210 further comprise one or more layers on top of the x-ray generating material. For example, these layers can comprise a thermally conducting overcoat and/or an electrically conducting overcoat.
In certain embodiments, the electron beam 111 propagates in a direction normal to the surface of the substrate 220 (see, e.g.,
As schematically illustrated by
X-Ray Optical System
In certain embodiments, the generated x-rays diverge from the x-ray source 110 and the x-ray optical system 120 comprises at least one x-ray optical train 300 downstream of the x-ray source 110. The at least one x-ray optical train 300 of certain embodiments is configured to collect a portion of the generated x-rays and to direct at least some of the collected x-rays towards the sample 130 (e.g., by collimating and/or focusing the collected x-rays). In certain embodiments in which the x-ray optical system 120 is configured to focus the x-rays, the point spread function (PSF) of the at least one optical train 300 is sufficiently small such that the spot size at the focus of the at least one optical train 300 is less than or equal to 500 microns (e.g., 50 microns or less) and the at least one optical train 300 has a working distance greater than 10 mm (e.g., in a range of 10 mm to 30 mm) at the focal spot 302 of the at least one optical train 300. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray optical train 300 comprises at least one reflective x-ray optic 310 configured to collect and focus x-ray energies of a bandwidth greater than 0.1% of an x-ray energy of interest. Various x-ray optical systems, x-ray optical trains, and x-ray optics compatible with certain embodiments described herein are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,570,265 and 9,449,781 and U.S. Publ. Appl. Nos. 2017/0162288 and 2019/0088381, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In certain embodiments, the at least one optical train 300 comprises at least one x-ray optic 310 (e.g. at least one capillary x-ray optic; capillary tube) with axial symmetry and aligned along an axis of brightest illumination from the x-ray source 110. The at least one x-ray optic 310 of certain embodiments is configured to reflect at least some of the collected x-rays 230 at grazing angles, focusing a portion of the x-rays into a focused x-ray beam 320 onto a focal spot 302. For example, at least one capillary x-ray optic can comprise an inner surface profile that corresponds to one or more portions of a quadric function, such as an ellipsoid, paraboloid, hyperboloid, cylindrical (e.g., two-dimensional) versions of these quadric functions, or Wolter Type I optics (paraboloid and ellipsoid/hyperboloid). In certain other embodiments, the at least one optical train 300 can comprise alternative focusing x-ray optics 310, including but not limited to: conical, polycapillary optics, Kirkpatrick-Baez optics, and Montel mirror. In certain embodiments, the at least one optical train 300 further comprises other x-ray optical elements, including but not limited to: Fresnel zone plates, cylindrical Wolter optics, Wolter Type II or III optics, Schwarzschild optics, diffraction gratings, crystal mirrors using Bragg diffraction, hole-array lenses, multi-prism or “alligator” lenses, rolled x-ray prism lenses, “lobster eye” optics, micro channel plate optics.
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray optic 310 comprises an optical substrite material, examples of which include but are not limited to: glass, silica, quartz, BK7, silicon (Si), ultra-low expansion glass (e.g., ULE® glass available from Corning Inc. of Corning N.Y.; Zerodur® glass ceramic available from Schott AG of Mainz Germany), or other elemental materials. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray optic 310 comprises at least one coating configured to improve the reflectivity of the at least one x-ray optic 310. For example, the at least one coating can comprise an elemental or alloy coating having a critical angle for total external reflection, which occurs for angles of incidence smaller than the critical angle. The elemental or alloy coating can comprise one or more high atomic elements (e.g. elements having an atomic number greater than 26; elements having a mass density greater than 2.5 g/cm3; platinum; gold; silver) and can be at least 25 nm thick.
For another example, the at least one coating can comprise a multilayer coating comprising alternating periodic layers of two or more materials that provide constructive interference in reflection for certain x-ray wavelengths. The reflection efficiency of such multilayer coatings depends on the wavelength and the angle of incidence of the x-rays, as well as the thickness of the alternating layers, so such multilayer coatings can be used as a narrow energy band reflector. Examples of materials for the alternating layers include but are not limited to: tungsten/carbon (W/C), tungsten/silicon (W/Si), tungsten/tungsten silicide (W/WSi2), molybdenum/silicon (Mo/Si), nickel/carbon (Ni/C), chromium/scandium (Cr/Sc), lanthanum/boron carbide (La/B4C), tungsten/boron carbide (W/B4C), and tantalum/silicon (Ta/Si).
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray optic 310 comprises at least one surface configured to be illuminated by the x-rays at a near-grazing angle (e.g. at angles of 5 degrees or smaller relative to the surface) which exceeds the critical angle for reflection such that reflection of higher energy x-rays by the surface is attenuated (e.g., a “high-energy cutoff” for reflection, which is well defined for a given material and critical angle). In certain embodiments, the attenuation of high energy x-rays prevents spurious signals due to higher harmonics (e.g. twice the energy) from being observed downstream in the x-ray detector 150. For example, the at least one surface and the near-grazing angle can be configured to reduce reflection of x-rays having energies more than 1.2 times the “high-energy cutoff” to be below 30%, below 25%, or below 10%. In certain embodiments, the attenuation of reflected high energy x-rays enables the x-ray source 110 to be operated at higher accelerating voltages that significantly increase efficient generation of bremsstrahlung radiation (e.g., the at least one x-ray optic 310 rejecting x-rays with energies corresponding to the higher-order harmonics of the crystal analyzer, thereby achieving higher signal-to-noise ratios by reducing higher-order contamination).
In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by
While both
In certain embodiments, the x-ray optical system 120 is matched to one or more x-ray generating materials of the x-ray generating structures 210 of the x-ray source 110 (e.g., by including x-ray optics 310 that have geometric shapes, sizes, and surface coatings that collect as many x-rays as possible from the x-ray source 110 and at an angle that satisfies the critical reflection angle of the x-ray energies of interest from the x-ray source 110; by maximizing the numerical aperture of the x-ray optics 310 for the x-ray energies of interest). For example, as schematically illustrated by
Sample
In certain embodiments, the sample 130 to be examined is mechanically coupled to a mount 400 and is positioned such that the focused x-ray beam 320 irradiates the sample 130 (e.g., the focal spot 302 of the x-ray optical system 120 is coincident with the sample 130). The mount 400 is configured to translate and/or to rotate the sample 130 so that different portions of the sample 130 are illuminated by the converging x-rays of the focused x-ray beam 320 (e.g., allowing different positions on the sample 130 to be illuminated in a systematic scan or from several angles of incidence) with the translation and/or rotation controlled by a controller (e.g., the analysis system 170).
X-Ray Spectrometer
In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer 140 is configured to collect and analyze the fluorescence x-rays 410 emitted from the sample 130 (e.g., from a secondary x-ray source corresponding to the focal spot 302 of the at least one x-ray optical train 300) and their energies. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer 140 comprises at least one x-ray analyzer 160 configured to disperse the fluorescence x-rays 410 and at least one x-ray detector 150 (e.g., array detector) configured to record the intensity of the dispersed x-rays as a function of position.
For example, as schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 comprises at least one single crystal or mosaic crystal having a width (e.g., in the sagittal plane) greater than or equal to 20 mm (e.g., 20 mm to 50 mm; 50 mm) and a length (e.g., in the dispersion plane) greater than or equal to 50 mm (e.g., 50 mm to 100 mm; 50 mm to 200 mm; 200 mm) and positioned in a range of 100 mm to 2000 mm (e.g., 250 mm) away from the source of x-rays (e.g., the sample 130). Examples of materials for the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 compatible with certain embodiments described herein include but are not limited to: Quartz (10-10) (e.g., for spectral range of 1.6 keV to 2 keV), Quartz (11-20) (e.g., for spectral range of 2.8 keV to 3.5 keV), Si (111) (e.g., for spectral range of 2 keV to 2.8 keV), Si (220) (e.g., for spectral range of 3.3 keV to 5 keV), Si (311), Si (511), Si (400), Si (620), InSb (111), Ge (111), Ge (220), Ge (311), Ge (511), Ge (400), Ge (620), and graphite layers (e.g., between 15 and 200 microns thick grown onto a curved substrate) aligned along the 002 plane, such as highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), or highly annealed pyrolytic graphite (HAPG).
In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 can comprise a single planar Bragg crystal, a crystal curved in one plane (e.g., the dispersion plane; the sagittal plane) and flat in the other perpendicular plane, and/or a doubly curved crystal curved in two perpendicular planes (e.g., the dispersion plane and the sagittal plane). For example, the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 can comprise a curved single-crystal portion of a wafer (e.g., single-crystal silicon aligned with the surface along the 111 or the 220 planes). For another example, the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 can comprise a single crystal grown onto a curved substrate, or thinned from a previously grown wafers and bent. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray analyzer 160 comprises a mosaic crystal comprising an ensemble of micro-crystals at varied angles throughout the material, each as small as a few hundred nanometers or as large as several microns, held by a backing material (e.g., metal). The mosaic crystal of certain embodiments can be curved at least in the sagittal, non-dispersive direction. X-rays that are not diffracted by the micro-crystal at the surface can still be diffracted from another micro-crystal positioned deeper within the mosaic crystal.
In certain embodiments, the crystal can be curved to allow the x-rays diverging in the directions perpendicular to the direction of propagation to be focused onto the x-ray detector 150 (e.g., von Hamos spectrometer). In certain embodiments, the crystal Bragg planes are curved with a bending radius in a range between 50 mm and 200 mm and/or with at least twice the radius of the Rowland circle 500 in the dispersion plane (e.g., Johann geometry; Johansson geometry). In certain other embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer 140 is arranged in the Wittry geometry with a doubly curved crystal (e.g., a Wittry crystal having the doubly curved crystal surface with the same radius as the Rowland circle 500 in the dispersion plane, twice the radius of the Rowland circle 500 in the sagittal plane, and the crystal Bragg planes are curved to a radius equal to twice the radius of the Rowland circle 500 in both planes). In certain such embodiments, the Wittry geometry advantageously reduces (e.g., eliminates) geometrical spectral broadening resulting in a worsening of the energy resolution (e.g., as compared to the Johann geometry) and/or advantageously increases the efficiency of collection of fluorescence x-rays for fast XES measurements over a wide range of Bragg angles. In certain other embodiments, other doubly curved crystal geometries can be used (e.g., over limited angular ranges), including but not limited to: spherical Johann geometry, toroidal Johann geometry, and spherical Johansson geometry.
In certain embodiments, the x-ray detector 150 comprises a spatially-resolving detector (e.g., a position-sensitive detector, a CCD-based detector comprising a two-dimensional or one-dimensional array sensor). For example, the x-ray detector 150 can comprise a pixel array having at least 1000 pixels in a first direction (e.g., in the dispersion plane) and at least 100 pixels in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction (e.g., a 2048×256 pixel array; 1024×1024 pixel array; 2048×512 pixel array; 2048×2048 pixel array). In certain embodiments, the long axis of the pixel array is aligned along the direction of x-ray propagation, and the dispersion of x-rays by wavelength occurs along the long axis. In certain embodiments, the x-ray detector 150 includes one or more detector elements of any type that detects x-rays, including but not limited to: linear detector elements, Si-PIN photodiode elements, proportional detector elements, avalanche detector elements, scintillator-type elements, gas-filled array elements, energy-dispersive detector elements, CMOS detector elements, S-CMOS detector elements, CCD detector elements (e.g., direct detection CCD with a sufficiently high detection quantum efficiency (DQE) and/or fast readout speed configured to serve as an energy-resolving detector).
In certain embodiments, the x-ray detector 150 is positioned to have its center pixel tangent to the Rowland circle 500. In certain embodiments, the x-ray detector 150 is configured to provide high spatial resolution with pixel sizes (e.g., widths) less than 75 microns (e.g., in a range of 3 microns to 26 microns; in a range of less than or equal to 20 microns; in a range of 15 microns to 20 microns). For example, the x-ray detector 150 can have multi-frame readout and sufficiently small pixels configured to provide pixel resolution of less than 0.3 eV (e.g., less than 0.1 eV).
In certain embodiments, the x-ray detector 150 comprises one or more filters (e.g., thin foils) positioned between the sample 130 and the x-ray detector 150 to select a certain portion of the x-rays emerging from the sample 130 for detection. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer 140 further comprises a second detector configured to detect the intensity of the incident x-rays, allowing normalization of the transmitted signal with any variations in the incident x-ray intensity. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer 140 comprises one or more apertures configured to prevent unwanted x-rays from being detected.
X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy Configurations
For example, as schematically illustrated by
In certain such embodiments, the x-ray source 110 comprises a plurality of x-ray generating structures 210 with different x-ray generating materials and the x-ray optical system 120 comprises a plurality of optical trains 300 (each optical train 300 matched or optimized for use with one of the x-ray generating materials) configured to collect x-rays in a sequence of spectral bands (e.g., combinations for different 1 keV bands). In certain embodiments, the x-ray analyzer 160 is configured to be rotated to expand the range of x-ray energies or wavelengths of the x-rays diffracted towards the x-ray detector 150 for a single combination of x-ray source 110 and x-ray optical system 120.
The x-ray spectrometer system 100 schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, the “off-Rowland circle” geometry provides a decrease of efficiency for a single wavelength while providing the ability to simultaneously detect multiple x-ray wavelengths (e.g., corresponding to different atomic elements within the sample 130). In certain embodiments, the sample 130 is moved relative to the focal spot 302 of the focused x-ray beam 320 for one-dimensional or two-dimensional mapping of the sample 130 (e.g., with spatial resolution better than or equal to 500 microns (e.g., better than or equal to 200 microns; better than or equal to 100 microns; better than or equal to 50 microns). In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by
As schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, the fluorescence x-rays 410 are generated by electron bombardment of the sample 130, while in certain other embodiments, the fluorescence x-rays 410 are generated by x-ray illumination of the sample 130 (e.g., by an x-ray source 110 and an x-ray optical system 120 as described herein). For example, the fluorescence x-rays 410 can be generated by irradiation of the sample 130 by focused x-rays from the x-ray optical system 120, and analysis of the fluorescence x-rays 410 can provide confocal information.
where D is the distance between the x-ray detector 150 and the crystal 162 of the x-ray analyzer 160 and is given by D=2R sin θ where R is the Rowland circle radius and θ is the Bragg angle, Wcrystal is the width of the crystal 162 of the x-ray analyzer 160, Wsource is the width of the illumination spot size on the sample 130, and Wdetector is the width of the pixel array of the x-ray detector 150.
For this position of the sample 130 relative to the x-ray analyzer 160, the pixel energy resolution can be expressed as:
and the energy coverage can be expressed as:
where E is the energy of interest, θ is the Bragg angle, Wpixel is the pixel width, Wdetector is the width of the pixel array of the x-ray detector 150, and 2R sin θ is the distance between the x-ray analyzer 160 and the x-ray detector 150 located on the Rowland circle 500. For example, for an x-ray detector 150 comprising a CCD pixel array with pixel size of 15 microns, a Rowland circle radius of 175 mm, a crystal width of 50 mm, an illumination spot size of 50 microns, and a Bragg angle of about 82 degrees for about 7 keV x-rays, the energy resolution can be estimated to be 0.04 eV. For a 50 eV coverage, the detector width is about 17.3 mm, so the distance between the illumination spot on the sample 130 and the x-ray analyzer 160 is about 256 mm, which corresponds to displacing the illumination spot by about 94 mm from the Rowland circle 500 towards the x-ray analyzer crystal 162. For a narrower energy coverage of 5 eV, the distance between the illumination spot on the sample 130 and the x-ray analyzer 160 is about 334 mm, which can be achieved by translating the illumination spot towards the Rowland circle 500 to a distance of about 16 mm from the Rowland circle 500. In certain embodiments, the location of the sample 130 relative to the Rowland circle 500 is controllably adjusted by translating the x-ray spectrometer relative to the sample 130, with the sample 130 remaining fixed in space.
In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 is compact (e.g., having a Rowland circle radius less than or equal to 25 cm, less than or equal to 12.5 cm, or less than or equal to 10 cm), while in certain other embodiments, the Rowland circle radius is less than or equal to 75 cm. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 has the focal spot 302 and the x-ray detector 150 in proximity to one another (e.g., in a back-scatter geometry) and with Bragg angles θ of up to 90 degrees. In certain embodiments, the x-ray analyzer 160 is mounted on a stage 630 (e.g., comprising a linear motion motor and/or an adjustably rotatable mount) that is configured to translate the x-ray analyzer 160 such that the radius of the Rowland circle 500 can be controllably adjusted and/or to adjust an orientation of the x-ray analyzer 160 relative to the fluorescence x-rays 410 from the sample 130.
In certain embodiments, one or more of the sample 130, the x-ray analyzer 160, and the x-ray detector 150 of the x-ray spectrometer system 100 is enclosed in a vacuum chamber with pressures less than 10−5 torr. In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectrometer system 100 comprises one or more mounts (e.g., goniometers) or other mechanical mechanisms configured to tilt and/or move the sample 130 (e.g., mount 400), the x-ray analyzer 160 (e.g., stage 630), and/or the x-ray detector 150 so as to adjust the relative alignment of the x-ray origin (e.g., the focal spot 302), the x-ray analyzer 160, and the x-ray detector 150, as well as to adjust parameters of the Rowland circle (e.g., the radius of the Rowland circle 500). In certain embodiments, the x-ray spectroscopy system 100 is configured to be interchanged between multiple geometries (e.g., between “off-Rowland circle” geometry and “on-Rowland circle” geometry, between spherical Johannsson geometry and other geometries).
In certain embodiments, the focal spot size and x-ray detector resolution are configured such that the x-ray spectrometer system 100 is compact (e.g., the Rowland circle radius is less than or equal to 12.5 cm or less than or equal to 10 cm) while providing high energy resolution (e.g., less than 2 eV; less than 1 eV). For example, the energy resolving power of certain embodiments can reach 7000, which is equivalent to a spectral resolution of 0.25 eV, and certain embodiments described herein can achieve a spectral resolution better than 0.25 eV.
In certain embodiments, multiple x-ray generating materials and multiple x-ray optical trains 300 (e.g., matched to the x-ray generating materials) are used simultaneously to illuminate the sample 130 at a variety of angles for x-ray emission spectroscopy, which can significantly improve throughput for applications such as production environments.
Various configurations have been described above. Although this invention has been described with reference to these specific configurations, the descriptions are intended to be illustrative of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, for example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Features or elements from various embodiments and examples discussed above may be combined with one another to produce alternative configurations compatible with embodiments disclosed herein. Various aspects and advantages of the embodiments have been described where appropriate. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, it should be recognized that the various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/651,883, filed Apr. 3, 2018 and incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1203495 | Coolidge | Oct 1916 | A |
1211092 | Coolidge | Jan 1917 | A |
1215116 | Coolidge | Feb 1917 | A |
1328495 | Coolidge | Jan 1920 | A |
1355126 | Coolidge | Oct 1920 | A |
1790073 | Pohl | Jan 1931 | A |
1917099 | Coolidge | Jul 1933 | A |
1946312 | Coolidge | Feb 1934 | A |
2926270 | Zunick | Feb 1960 | A |
3795832 | Holland | Mar 1974 | A |
4165472 | Wittry | Aug 1979 | A |
4227112 | Waugh et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4266138 | Nelson et al. | May 1981 | A |
4426718 | Hayashi | Jan 1984 | A |
4523327 | Eversole | Jun 1985 | A |
4573186 | Reinhold | Feb 1986 | A |
4807268 | Wittrey | Feb 1989 | A |
4940319 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951304 | Piestrup et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4972449 | Upadhya et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5001737 | Lewis et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5008918 | Lee et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5132997 | Kojima | Jul 1992 | A |
5148462 | Spitsyn et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5173928 | Momose et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5249216 | Ohsugi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5276724 | Kumasaka et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5602899 | Larson | Feb 1997 | A |
5604782 | Cash, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629969 | Koshishiba | May 1997 | A |
5657365 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682415 | O'Hara | Oct 1997 | A |
5715291 | Momose | Feb 1998 | A |
5729583 | Tang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737387 | Smither | Apr 1998 | A |
5768339 | O'Hara | Jun 1998 | A |
5772903 | Hirsch | Jun 1998 | A |
5778039 | Hossain | Jul 1998 | A |
5812629 | Clauser | Sep 1998 | A |
5825848 | Virshup et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832052 | Hirose et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857008 | Reinhold | Jan 1999 | A |
5878110 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881126 | Momose | Mar 1999 | A |
5912940 | O'Hara | Jun 1999 | A |
5930325 | Momose | Jul 1999 | A |
6108397 | Cash, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108398 | Mazor et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118853 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125167 | Morgan | Sep 2000 | A |
6278764 | Barbee, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307916 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6359964 | Kogan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377660 | Ukita et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381303 | Vu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389100 | Verman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430254 | Wilkins | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6442231 | O'Hara | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456688 | Taguchi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463123 | Korenev | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487272 | Kutsuzawa | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504902 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6507388 | Burghoorn | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6553096 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560313 | Harding et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560315 | Price et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6707883 | Tiearney et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711234 | Loxley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6811612 | Gruen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815363 | Yun et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829327 | Chen | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847699 | Rigali et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850598 | Fryda et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870172 | Mankos et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885503 | Yun et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6914723 | Yun et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917472 | Yun et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6947522 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975703 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003077 | Jen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006596 | Janik | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7015467 | Maldonado et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023955 | Chen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7057187 | Yun et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7079625 | Lenz | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095822 | Yun | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7110503 | Kumakhov | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119953 | Yun et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130375 | Yun et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7170969 | Yun et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7180979 | Momose | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180981 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183547 | Yun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7215736 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7215741 | Ukita et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218700 | Huber et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218703 | Yada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221731 | Yada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245696 | Yun et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7268945 | Yun et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286640 | Yun et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297959 | Yun et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298826 | Inazuru | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7330533 | Sampayon | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346148 | Ukita | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346204 | Ito | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349525 | Morton | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359487 | Newcome | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7365909 | Yun et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365918 | Yun et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7382864 | Hebert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388942 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394890 | Wang et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7400704 | Yun et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7406151 | Yun | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7412024 | Yun et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7412030 | O'Hara | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7412131 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414787 | Yun et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433444 | Baumann | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440542 | Baumann | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443953 | Yun et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7453981 | Baumann | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463712 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486770 | Baumann | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492871 | Popescu | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499521 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515684 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522698 | Popescu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522707 | Steinlage et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522708 | Heismann | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529343 | Safai et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7532704 | Hempel | May 2009 | B2 |
7551719 | Yokhin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551722 | Ohshima et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561662 | Wang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564941 | Baumann | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7583789 | Macdonald et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7601399 | Barnola et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7639786 | Baumann | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646843 | Popescu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7672433 | Zhong et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680243 | Yokhin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7787588 | Yun et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7796725 | Yun et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7796726 | Gendreau et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7800072 | Yun et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809113 | Aoki et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813475 | Wu et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7817777 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7864426 | Yun et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7864922 | Kawabe | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873146 | Okunuki et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876883 | O'Hara | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7889838 | David et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7889844 | Okunuki et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914693 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920673 | Lanza et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7920676 | Yun et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7924973 | Kottler et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929667 | Zhuang et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7945018 | Heismann | May 2011 | B2 |
7949092 | Brons | May 2011 | B2 |
7949095 | Ning | May 2011 | B2 |
7974379 | Case et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7983381 | David et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991120 | Okunuki et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005185 | Popescu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009796 | Popescu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009797 | Ouchi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8041004 | David | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036341 | Lee | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058621 | Kommareddy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068579 | Yun et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8073099 | Niu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8094784 | Morton | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8139711 | Takahashi | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139716 | Okunuki et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8184771 | Murakoshi | May 2012 | B2 |
8208602 | Lee | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208603 | Sato | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8233587 | Sato | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243879 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243884 | Rödhammer et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280000 | Takahashi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306183 | Koehler | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8306184 | Chang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351569 | Baker | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351570 | Nakamura | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353628 | Yun et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8360640 | Reinhold | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374309 | Donath | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8406378 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8416920 | Okumura et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8422633 | Lantz et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451975 | Tada | May 2013 | B2 |
8422637 | Okunuki et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8509386 | Lee et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520803 | Behling | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526575 | Yun et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8532257 | Mukaide et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553843 | Drory | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559594 | Ouchi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559597 | Chen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565371 | Bredno | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576983 | Baeumer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591108 | Tada | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602648 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8632247 | Ishii | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8666024 | Okunuki et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8666025 | Klausz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8699667 | Steinlage et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8735844 | Khaykovich et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8737565 | Lyon et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8744048 | Lee et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755487 | Kaneko | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767915 | Stutman | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8767916 | Hashimoto | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781069 | Murakoshi | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8824629 | Ishii | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831174 | Kohara | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831175 | Silver et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831179 | Adler et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855265 | Engel | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861682 | Okunuki et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903042 | Ishii | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908824 | Kondoh | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8995622 | Adler et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001967 | Baturin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9008278 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9016943 | Jacobsen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020101 | Omote et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9063055 | Ouchi | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9129715 | Adler et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9222899 | Yamaguchi | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9257254 | Ogura et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9263225 | Morton | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9329141 | Stutman | May 2016 | B2 |
9357975 | Baturin | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9390881 | Yun et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9439613 | Stutman | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9448190 | Yun et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9449781 | Yun et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9494534 | Baturin | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9543109 | Yun et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9564284 | Gerzoskovitz | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9570265 | Yun et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9594036 | Yun et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9632040 | Stutman | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9719947 | Yun et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9757081 | Proksa | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9761021 | Koehler | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9823203 | Yun et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9826949 | Ning | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9837178 | Nagai | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9842414 | Koehler | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9861330 | Rossl | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9874531 | Yun et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9881710 | Roessl | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9916655 | Sampanoni | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9939392 | Wen | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9970119 | Yokoyama | May 2018 | B2 |
10014148 | Tang et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10028716 | Rossl | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10045753 | Teshima | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10068740 | Gupta | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10074451 | Kottler et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10085701 | Hoshino | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10141081 | Preusche | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10151713 | Wu et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10153062 | Gall et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10182194 | Karim et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10217596 | Liang et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10247683 | Yun et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10264659 | Miller et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10176297 | Zerhusen et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20010006413 | Burghoorn | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020085676 | Snyder | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030142790 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030223536 | Yun et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040047446 | Platonov | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040120463 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140432 | Maldonado et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050074094 | Jen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123097 | Wang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163284 | Inazuru | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050282300 | Yun et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060045234 | Pelc | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062350 | Yokhin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070030959 | Ritter | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070071174 | Hebert et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070108387 | Yun et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110217 | Ukita | May 2007 | A1 |
20070183563 | Baumann | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183579 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189449 | Baumann | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070248215 | Ohshima et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080084966 | Aoki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089484 | Reinhold | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094694 | Yun et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080116398 | Hara | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159707 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165355 | Yasui et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170662 | Reinhold | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170668 | Kruit et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181363 | Fenter et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080240344 | Reinhold | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273662 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090052619 | Endoh | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090092227 | David | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154640 | Baumann et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090316860 | Okunuki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012845 | Baeumer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027739 | Lantz et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040202 | Lee | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046702 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061508 | Takahashi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091947 | Niu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141151 | Reinhold | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100246765 | Murakoshi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100260315 | Sato et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272239 | Lantz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284513 | Kawabe | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110026680 | Sato | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110038455 | Silver et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058655 | Okumura et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064191 | Toth et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085644 | Verman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135066 | Behling | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142204 | Zou et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110235781 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243302 | Murakoshi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268252 | Ozawa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120041679 | Stampanoni | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057669 | Vogtmeier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120163547 | Lee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163554 | Tada | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120224670 | Kiyohara et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120228475 | Pang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120269323 | Adler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269324 | Adler | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269325 | Adler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269326 | Adler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120294420 | Nagai | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130011040 | Kido et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032727 | Kondoe | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130039460 | Levy | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130108012 | Sato | May 2013 | A1 |
20130108022 | Kugland et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130195246 | Tamura et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223594 | Sprong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259207 | Omote et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279651 | Yokoyama | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308112 | Clube et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308754 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140023973 | Marconi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037052 | Adler | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064445 | Adler | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072104 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079188 | Hesselink et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140105363 | Chen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140146945 | Fredenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153692 | Larkin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177800 | Sato et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185778 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140205057 | Koehler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211919 | Ogura et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226785 | Stutman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241493 | Yokoyama | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140270060 | Date et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140369469 | Ogura et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150030126 | Radicke | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150030127 | Aoki et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150043713 | Chen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049860 | Das | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055743 | Vedantham et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055745 | Holzner et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150092924 | Yun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150110252 | Yun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117599 | Yun et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150194287 | Yun et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243397 | Yun et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150247811 | Yun et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260663 | Yun et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150357069 | Yun et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160064175 | Yun et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160066870 | Yun et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160106387 | Kahn | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160178540 | Yun et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160268094 | Yun et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160320320 | Yun et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160351370 | Yun et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170047191 | Yun et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052128 | Yun et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170162288 | Yun et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170162359 | Tang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170227476 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170234811 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170261442 | Yun et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170336334 | Yun et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180144901 | Yun et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180261352 | Matsuyama et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180306734 | Morimoto et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180323032 | Strelec et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180344276 | DeFreitas et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180348151 | Kasper et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180356355 | Momose et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190017942 | Filevich | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190017946 | Wack et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190018824 | Zarkadas | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190019647 | Lee et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190027265 | Dey et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043689 | Camus | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190064084 | Ullom et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190086342 | Pois et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190088439 | Honda | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190113466 | Karim et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190115184 | Zalubovsky | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131103 | Tuohimaa | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132936 | Steck et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102124537 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102551761 | Jul 2012 | CN |
0432568 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0751533 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1028451 | Aug 2000 | EP |
2548447 | Jan 1985 | FR |
H06-188092 | Jul 1994 | JP |
H07-056000 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H08-184572 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2000-306533 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003-288853 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004-089445 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007-218683 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-265981 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-311185 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-200359 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-145111 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-197495 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009-195349 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-212058 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-236986 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011-029072 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-218147 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2012-032387 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-187341 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2012-254294 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-508683 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013-157269 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013-160637 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013-239317 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2015-002074 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015-047306 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2015-077289 | Apr 2015 | JP |
WO 1995006952 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 1998011592 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 2002039792 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2003081631 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2005109969 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006096052 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 20071125833 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2009098027 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 20091104560 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2011032572 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2012032950 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2013004574 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013111050 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013118593 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013160153 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013168468 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014054497 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2015016019 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2015034791 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015066333 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015084466 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2015168473 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO 2015176023 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO 2015187219 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2016187623 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO 2017031740 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 2017204850 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2017213996 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO 2018175570 | Sep 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Diamond,” Section 10.4.2 of Zorman et al., “Material Aspects of Micro-Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Chapter 10 of Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 2nd ed., Barat Bushan, ed. (Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, 2007), pp. 312-314. |
“Element Six CVD Diamond Handbook” (Element Six, Luxembourg, 2015). |
“High performance benchtop EDXRF spectrometer with Windows® software,” published by: Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan; 2017. |
“Monochromatic Doubly Curved Crystal Optics,” published by: X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc. (XOS), East Greenbush, NY; 2017. |
“Optics and Detectors,” Section 4 of XS-Ray Data Booklet, 3rd Ed., A.C. Thompson ed. (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, 2009). |
“Properties of Solids,” Ch. 12 of CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 90th ed., Devid R. Lide & W.M. “Mickey” Haynes, eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009), pp. 12-41-12-46; 12-203-12-212. |
“Science and Technology of Future Light Sources”, Arthur L. Robinson (LBNL) and Brad Plummer (SLAG), eds. Report Nos. ANL-08/39 / BNL-81895-2008 / LBNL-1090E-2009 / SLAC-R-917 (Lawrence Berkeley Nal'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Dec. 2008). |
“Toward Control of Matter: Energy Science Needs for a New Class of X-Ray Light Sources” (Lawrence Berkeley Nal'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 2008). |
X-ray-Optics.de Website, http://www.x-ray-optics.de/, accessed Feb. 13, 2016. |
“X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities,” Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities, D. Mills & H. Padmore, Co-Chairs, (U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Potomac, MD, Mar. 2013). |
Abullian et al., “Quantitative determination of the lateral density and intermolecular correlation between proteins anchored on the membrane surfaces using grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering and grazing incidence X-ray fluorescence,” Nov. 28, 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 137, pp. 204907-1 to 204907-8. |
Adachi et al., “Development of the 17-inch Direct-Conversion Dynamic Flat-panel X-ray Detector (FPD),” Digital R/F (Shimadzu Corp., 2 pages (no date, published-2004 with product release). |
Aharonovich et al., “Diamond Nanophotonics,” Adv. Op. Mat'ls vol. 2, Issue 10 (2014). |
Als-Nielsen et al., “Phase contrast imaging” Sect. 9.3 of Ch. 9 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” , (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 318-329. |
Als-Nielsen et al., “Photoelectric Absorption,” Ch. 7 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011). |
Als-Nielsen et al., “Refraction and reflection from interfaces,” Ch. 3 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 69-112. |
Als-Nielsen et al., “X-rays and their interaction with matter”, and “Sources”, Ch. 1 & 2 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011). |
Altapova et al., “Phase contrast laminography based on Talbot interferometry,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, No. 6, (2012) pp. 6496-6508. |
Ando et al., “Smooth and high-rate reactive ion etching of diamond,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 11, (2002) pp. 824-827. |
Arfelli et al., “Mammography with Synchrotron Radiation: Phase-Detection Techniques,” Radiology vol. 215, (2000), pp. 286-293. |
Arndt et al., Focusing Mirrors for Use with Microfocus X-ray Tubes, 1998, Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 31, pp. 733-741. |
Bachucki et al., “Laboratory-based double X-ray spectrometer for simultaneous X-ray emission and X-ray absorption studies,” J. Anal. Atomic Spectr. DOI:10.1039/C9JA00159J (2019). |
Balaic et al., “X-ray optics of tapered capillaries,” Appl. Opt. vol. 34 (Nov. 1995) pp. 7263-7272. |
Baltes et al., “Coherent and incoherent grating reconstruction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 3(8), (1986), pp. 1268-1275. |
Barbee Jr., “Multilayers for x-ray optics,” Opt. Eng. vol. 25 (Aug. 1986) pp. 898-915. |
Baron et al., “A compact optical design for Bragg reflections near backscattering,” J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 8 (2001), pp. 1127-1130. |
Bech, “In-vivo dark-field and phase-contrast x-ray imaging,” Scientific Reports 3, (2013), Article number: 03209. |
Bech, “X-ray imaging with a grating interferometer,” University of Copenhagan PhD. Thesis, (May 1, 2009). |
Bergamin et al., “Measuring small lattice distortions in Si-crystals by phase-contrast x-ray topography,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (Dec. 31, 2000) pp. 2678-2682. |
Bernstorff, “Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS),” Presentation at Advanced School on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Sources and their Multidisciplinary Applications, Apr. 2008, Trieste, Italy. |
Bilderback et al., “Single Capillaries,” Ch. 29 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Birkholz, “Chapter 4: Grazing Incidence Configurations,” Thin Film Analysis by X-ray Scattering (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2006). |
Bjeoumikhov et al., “A modular system for XRF and XRD applications consisting of a microfocus X-ray source and different capillary optics,” X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 33 (2004), pp. 312-316. |
Bjeoumikhov et al., “Capillary Optics for X-Rays,” Ch. 18 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 287-306. |
Canberra Model S-5005 WinAxil X-Ray Analysis Software, published by: Canberra Eurisys Benelux N.V./S.A.,Zellik, Belgium; Jun. 2004. |
Cerrina, “The Schwarzschild Objective,” Ch. 27 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Chen et al., “Advance in detection of low sulfur content by wavelength dispersive XRF,” Proceedings of the Annual ISA Analysis Division Symposium (2002). |
Chen et al., “Doubly curved crystal (DCC) X-ray optics and applications,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (2002), pp. 99-103. |
Chen et al., “Guiding and focusing neutron beams using capillary optics,” Nature vol. 357 (Jun. 4, 1992), pp. 391-393. |
Chervenak et al., “Experimental thick-target bremsstrahlung spectra from electrons in the range 10 to 30 keV”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 12 (1975), pp. 26-33. |
Chon, “Measurement of Roundness for an X-Ray Mono-Capillary Optic by Using Computed Tomography,” J. Korean Phys. Soc. vol. 74, No. 9, pp. 901-906 (May 2019). |
Coan et al., “In vivo x-ray phase contrast analyzer-based imaging for longitudinal osteoarthritis studies in guinea pigs,” Phys. Med. Biol. vol. 55(24) (2010), pp. 7649-7662. |
Cockcroft et al., “Chapter 2: Experimental Setups,” Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice, R.E. Dinnebier and S.J.L. Billinge, eds (Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, London, UK, 2008). |
Cohen et al., “Tunable laboratory extended x-ray absorption fine structure system,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1980, pp. 273-277. |
Cong et al., “Fourier transform-based iterative method for differential phase-contrast computed tomography”, Opt. Lett. vol. 37 (2012), pp. 1784-1786. |
Cornaby et al., “Advances in X-ray Microfocusing with Monocapillary Optics at CHESS,” CHESS News Magazine (2009), pp. 63-66. |
Cornaby et al., “Design of Single-Bounce Monocapillary X-ray Optics,” Advances in X-ray Analysis: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, vol. 50, (International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), 2007), pp. 194-200. |
Cornaby, “The Handbook of X-ray Single Bounce Monocapillary Optics, Including Optical Design and Synchrotron Applications” (PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May 2008). |
David et al., “Fabrication of diffraction gratings for hard x-ray phase contrast imaging,” Microelectron. Eng. vol. 84, (2007), pp. 1172-1177. |
David et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography using a grating interferometer,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B vol. 62 (2007) pp. 626-630. |
Davis et al., “Bridging the Micro-to-Macro Gap: A New Application for Micro X-Ray Fluorescence,” Microsc Microanal., vol. 17(3) (Jun. 2011), pp. 410-417. |
Diaz et al., “Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images,” In: Digital Mammography, Proceedings 10th International Workshop IWDM 2010 (Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), (2010), pp. 628-635 (9 pages). Jun. 18, 2010. |
Ding et al., “Reactive Ion Etching of CVD Diamond Films for MEMS Applications,” Micromachining and Microfabrication, Proc. SPIE vol. 4230 (2000), pp. 224-230. |
Dobrovinskaya et al., “Thermal Properties,” Sect. 2.1.5 of “Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing,, Applications” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2009). |
Dong et al., “Improving Molecular Sensitivity in X-Ray Fluorescence Molecular Imaging (XFMI) of Iodine Distribution in Mouse-Sized Phantoms via Excitation Spectrum Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 56966-56976 (2018). |
Erko et al., “X-ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198. |
Falcone et al., “New directions in X-ray microscopy,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 52, No. 4, (Jul.-Aug. 2010), pp. 293-318. |
Fernández-Ruiz, “TXRF Spectrometry as a Powerful Tool for the Study of Metallic Traces in Biological Systems,” Development in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 1 (2014), pp. 1-14. |
Freund, “Mirrors for Synchrotron Beamlines,” Ch. 26 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Ge et al., “Investigation of the partially coherent effects in a 2D Talbot interferometer,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. vol. 401, (2011), pp. 865-870. Apr. 29, 2011 pub Jun. 14, 2011. |
Gibson et al., “Polycapillary Optics: An Enabling Technology for New Applications,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 45 (2002), pp. 286-297. |
Gonzales et al., “Angular Distribution of Bremsstrahlung Produced by 10-Kev and 20 Kev Electrons Incident on a Thick Au Target”, in Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, AIP Conf. Proc. 1221 (2013), pp. 114-117. |
Gonzales et al., “Angular distribution of thick-target bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20 keV incident on Ag”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 84 (2011): 052726. |
Guttmann et al., “Ellipsoidal capillary as condenser for the BESSSY full-field x-ray microscope,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. vol. 186 (2009): 012064. |
Harasse et al., “Iterative reconstruction in x-ray computed laminography from differential phase measurements”, Opt. Express. vol. 19 (2011), pp. 16560-16573. |
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with a Grating Interferometer using Iterative Reconstruction”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 163-168. |
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 7804 (2010), 780411. |
Hasse et al., “New developments in laboratory-based x-ray sources and optics,” Adv. in Laboratory-based X-Ray Sources, Optics, and Applications VI, ed. A.M. Khounsary, Proc. SPIE vol. 10387, 103870B-1 (2017). |
Hemraj-Benny et al., “Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy as a Tool for Investigating Nanomaterials,” Small, vol. 2(1), (2006), pp. 26-35. |
Henke et al., “X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E=50−30000 eV, Z=1−92,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 54 (No. 2) (Jul. 1993), pp. 181-342. |
Hennekam et al., “Trace metal analysis of sediment cores using a novel X-ray fluorescence core scanning method,” Quaternary Int'l, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.10.018 (2018). |
Honma et al., Full-automatic XAFS Measurement System of the Engineering Science Research II beamline BL14B2 at Spring-8, 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings 1234, pp. 13-16. |
Howard et al., “High-Definition X-ray Fluorescence Elemental Mapping of Paintings,” Anal. Chem., 2012, vol. 84(7), pp. 3278-3286. |
Howells, “Gratings and Monochromators in the VUV and Soft X-Ray Spectral Region,” Ch. 21 of Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Howells, “Mirrors for Synchrotron-Radiation Beamlines,” Publication LBL-34750 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 1993). |
Hrdý et al, “Diffractive-Refractive Optics: X-ray Crystal Monochromators with Profiled Diffracting Surfaces,” Ch. 20 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2008). |
Hwang et al, “New etching process for device fabrication using diamond,” Diamond & Related Materials, vol. 13 (2004) pp. 2207-2210. |
Ide-Ektessabi et al., “The role of trace metallic elements in neurodegenerative disorders: quantitative analysis using XRF and XANES spectroscopy,” Anal. Sci., vol. 21(7) (Jul. 2005), pp. 885-892. |
Ihsan et al., “A microfocus X-ray tube based on a microstructured X-ray target”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B vol. 267 (2009) pp. 3566-3573. |
Ishisaka et al., “A New Method of Analyzing Edge Effect in Phase Contrast Imaging with Incoherent X-rays,” Optical Review, vol. 7, No. 6, (2000), pp. 566-572. |
Ito et al., “A Stable In-Laboratory EXAFS Measurement System,” Jap. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1983, pp. 357-360. |
Itoh et al., “Two-dimensional grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging using Fourier transform phase retrieval,” Op. Express, vol. 19, No. 4 (2011) pp. 3339-3346. |
Janssens et al, “Recent trends in quantitative aspects of microscopic X-ray fluorescence analysis,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29.6 (Jun. 2010): 464-478. |
Jahrman et al., “Vacuum formed temporary spherically and toroidally bent crystal analyzers for x-ray absorption and x-ray emission spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 013106 (2019). |
Jiang et al., “X-Ray Phase—Contrast Imaging with Three 2D Gratings,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, (2008), 827152, 8 pages. |
Joy, “Astronomical X-ray Optics,” Ch. 28 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Kalasova et al., “Characterization of a laboratory-based X-ray computed nonotomography system for propagation-based method of phase contrast imaging,” IEEE Trans. on Instr. and Meas., DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2910338 (2019). |
Keyrilainen et al., “Phase contrast X-ray imaging of breast,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 51 (8), (2010), pp. 866-884. Jan. 18, 2010 pub Jun. 15, 2010. |
Kidalov et al., “Thermal Conductivity of Diamond Composites,” Materials, vol. 2 (2009) pp. 2467-2495. |
Kido et al., “Bone Cartilage Imaging with X-ray Interferometry using a Practical X-ray Tube”, in Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE vol. 7622 (2010), 762240. |
Kim, “Talbot images of wavelength-scale amplitude gratings,” Opt. Express vol. 20(5), (2012), pp. 4904-4920. |
Kim et al., “Observation of the Talbot Effect at Beamline 6C Bio Medical Imaging of he Pohang Light Source-II,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., vol. 74, No. 10, pp. 935-940 (May 2019). |
Kirkpatrick et al., “Formation of Optical Images by X-Rays”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 38(9) (1948), pp. 766-774. |
Kirz, “Phase zone plates for x rays and the extreme uv,” J. Op. Soc. Am. vol. 64 (Mar. 1974), pp. 301-309. |
Kirz et al., “The History and Future of X-ray Microscopy”, J. Physics: Conden. Series vol. 186 (2009): 012001. |
Kiyohara et al., “Development of the Talbot-Lau Interferometry System Available for Clinical Use”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Cong. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 97-102. |
Klockenkämper et al., “7.1 Instrumental Developments” and “7.3 Future Prospects by Combinations,” from Chapter 7 of Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015). |
Klockenkämper et al., “Chapter 3: Instrumentation for TXRF and GI-XRF,” Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015). |
Kottler et al., “A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,” Opt. Express vol. 15(3), (2007), pp. 1175-1181. |
Kottler et al., “Dual energy phase contrast x-ray imaging with Talbot-Lau interferometer,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 108(11), (2010), 114906. Jul. 7, 2010 pub Dec. 7, 2010. |
Kumakhov et al., “Multiple reflection from surface X-ray optics,” Physics Reports, vol. 191(5), (1990), pp. 289-350. |
Kumakhov, “X-ray Capillary Optics. History of Development and Present Status” in Kumakhov Optics and Application, Proc. SPIE 4155 (2000), pp. 2-12. |
Kuwabara et al., “Hard-X-ray Phase-Difference Microscopy with a Low-Brilliance Laboratory X-ray Source”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 062502. |
Kuznetsov, “X-Ray Optics Calculator,” Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMT RAS), Chernogolovka, Russia (6 pages submitted); 2016. |
Lagomarsino et al., “Reflective Optical Arrays,” Ch. 19 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al. eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 307-317. |
Lai, “X-Ray Microfocusing Optics,” Slide Presentation from Argonne National Laboratory, 71 slides, Cheiron Summer School 2007. |
Langhoff et al., “X-ray Sources,” Ch. 2 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2006), pp. 33-82. |
Lechner et al., “Silicon drift detecors for high count rate X-ray spectroscopy at room temperature,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 458A (2001), pp. 281-287. |
Leenaers et al., “Application of Glancing Incidence X-ray Analysis,” 1997, X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 26, pp. 115-121. |
Lengeler et al., “Refractive X-ray Optics,” Ch. 20 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001. |
Li et al., “Source-optic-crystal optimisation for compact monochromatic imaging,” Proc. SPIE 5537 (2004), pp. 105-114. |
Li et al., “X-ray phase-contrast imaging using cascade Talbot-Lau interferometers,” Proc. SPIE 10964 (2018), pp. 1096469-1-1096469-6. |
Lohmann et al., “An interferometer based on the Talbot effect,” Optics Communications vol. 2 (1971), pp. 413-415. |
Lübcke et al., “Soft X-ray nanoscale imaging using a sub-pixel resolution charge coupled device (CCD) camera,” Ref. Sci. Instrum. vol. 90, 043111 (2019). |
Lühl et al., “Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy with efficient X-ray fluorescence detection (STXM-XRF) for biomedical applications in the soft and tender energy range,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577518016879, (2019). |
MacDonald et al., “An Introduction to X-ray and Neutron Optics,” Ch. 19 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
MacDonald et al., “Polycapillary and Multichannel Plate X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 30 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
MacDonald et al., “Polycapillary X-ray Optics for Microdiffraction,” J. Appl. Cryst., vol. 32 (1999) pp. 160-167. |
MacDonald, “Focusing Polycapillary Optics and Their Applications,” X-Ray Optics and Instrumentation, vol. 2010, (Oct. 2010): 867049. |
Maj et al., “Etching methods for improving surface imperfections of diamonds used for x-ray monochromators,” Adv. X-ray Anal., vol. 48 (2005), pp. 176-182. |
Malgrange, “X-ray Optics for Synchrotron Radiation,” ACTA Physica Polinica A, vol. 82(1) (1992) pp. 13-32. |
Malzer et al., “A laboratory spectrometer for high throughput X-ray emission spectroscopy in catalysis research,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 89, 113111 (2018). |
Masuda et al., “Fabrication of Through-Hole Diamond Membranes by Plasma Etching Using Anodic Porous Alumina Mask,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 4(11) (2001) pp. G101-G103. |
Matsushita, “Mirrors and Multilayers,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factor, Tsukuba, Japan, 65 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Sprint-8, Japan, Nov. 2009). |
Matsushita, “X-ray monochromators,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Japan, 70 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Spring-8, Japan, Nov. 2009). |
Matsuyama et al., “Wavefront measurement for a hard-X-ray nanobeam using single-grating interferometry”, Opt Express vol. 20 (2012), pp. 24977-24986. |
Miao et al., “Motionless phase stepping in X-ray phase contrast imaging with a compact source,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110(48), (2013), pp. 19268-19272. |
Michette, “Zone and Phase Plates, Bragg-Fresnel Optics,” Ch. 23 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Mizutani et al., X-ray microscopy for neural circuit reconstruction in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012092. |
Modregger et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging,” Ch. 3 of Emerging Imaging Technologies in Medicine, M. Anastasio & P. La Riviere, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, (2012), pp. 43-56. |
Momose et al., “Biomedical Imaging by Talbot-Type X-Ray Phase Tomography” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE vol. 6318 (2006) 63180T. |
Momose et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Imaging Using Multiline X-ray Source”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 48 (2009), 076512. |
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography by X-ray Talbot Interferometry for Biological Imaging” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 2006 pp. 5254-5262. |
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography Using X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation: Ninth International Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 879 (2007), pp. 1365-1368. |
Momose et al., “Phase-Contrast X-Ray Imaging Using an X-Ray Interferometer for Biological Imaging”, Analytical Sciences vol. 17 Supplement (2001), pp. i527-i530. |
Momose et al., “Sensitivity of X-ray Phase Imaging Based on Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 8077-8080. |
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Measurements with Talbot Interferometry and Its Applications”, in International Conference on Advanced Phase Measurement Methods in Optics and Imaging, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1236 (2010), pp. 195-199. |
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging—From Static Observation to Dynamic Observation—”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 67-77. |
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Using Lau Effect”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 066603. |
Momose et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Talbot Interferometry”, in “Biomedical Mathematics: Promising Directions in Imaging, Therapy Planning, and Inverse Problems”, Y. Censor, M. Jiang & G.Wang, eds. (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, 2010), pp. 281-320. |
Momose et al., “X-ray phase tomography with a Talbot interferometer in combination with an X-ray imaging microscope”, in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012044. |
Momose et al., “X-ray Talbot Interferometry with Capillary Plates”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 (2006), pp. 314-316. |
Momose et al., “Four-dimensional X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometry and white synchrotron radiation: dynamic observation of a living worm”, Opt. Express vol. 19 (2011), pp. 8423-8432. |
Momose et al., “High-speed X-ray phase imaging and X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometer and white synchrotron radiation”, Opt. Express vol. 17 (2009), pp. 12540-12545. |
Momose et al., “Phase Imaging with an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 21-30. |
Momose et al.,“Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 42 (2003), pp. L866-L868. |
Momose et al.,“Phase Tomography Using an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV, Proc. SPIE vol. 5535 (2004), pp. 352-360. |
Momose, “Recent Advances in X-ray Phase Imaging”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 44 (2005), pp. 6355-6367. |
Montgomery, “Self Imaging Objects of Infinite Aperture,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 57(6), (1967), pp. 772-778. |
Morimoto et al., “Development of multiline embedded X-ray targets for X-ray phase contrast imaging,” XTOP 2012 Book of Abstracts, (Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2012), pp. 74-75. |
Morimoto et al., X-ray phase contrast imaging by compact Talbot-Lau interferometer with a signal transmission grating, 2014, Optics Letters, vol. 39, No. 15, pp. 4297-4300. |
Munro et al., Design of a novel phase contrast imaging system for mammography, 2010, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, No. 14, pp. 4169-4185. |
Nango et al., “Talbot-defocus multiscan tomography using the synchrotron X-ray microscope to study the lacuno-canalicular network in mouse bone”, Biomed. Opt. Express vol. 4 (2013), pp. 917-923. |
Neuhausler et al., “Non-destructive high-resolution X-ray imaging of ULSI micro-electronics using keV X-ray microscopy in Zernike phase contrast,” Microelectronic Engineering, Elsevier Publishers BV., Amsterdam, NO, vol. 83, No. 4-9 (Apr. 1, 2006) pp. 1043-1046. |
Newville, “Fundamentals of XAFS,” (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Jul. 23, 2004). |
Noda et al., “Fabrication of Diffraction Grating with High Aspect Ratio Using X-ray Lithography Technique for X-ray Phase Imaging,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46, (2007), pp. 849-851. |
Noda et al., “Fabrication of High Aspect Ratio X-ray Grating Using X-ray Lithography” J. Solid Mech_ Mater. Eng. vol. 3 (2009), pp. 416-423. |
Nojeh, “Carbon Nanotube Electron Sources: From Electron Beams to Energy Conversion and Optophononics”, ISRN Nanomaterials vol. 2014 (2014): 879827. |
Nuhn, “From storage rings to free electron lasers for hard x-rays”, J.A37 Phys.: Condens. Matter vol. 16 (2004), pp. S3413-S34121. |
Nykanen et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography,” Med. Phys. vol. 30(7), (2003), pp. 1864-1873. |
Oji et al., Automatic XAFS measurement system developed at BL14B2 in SPring-8, Available online Nov. 15, 2011, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 19, pp. 54-59. |
Olbinado et al., “Demonstration of Stroboscopic X-ray Talbot Interferometry Using Polychromatic Synchrotron and Laboratory X-ray Sources”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 6 (2013), 096601. |
Ortega et al., “Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy,” J. Royal Society Interface vol. 6 suppl. 5 (Oct. 6, 2009), pp. 6S649-58. |
Otendal et al., A 9 keV electron-impact liquid-gallium-jet x-ray source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 79 (2008): 016102. |
Oxford Instruments Inc., Series 5000 Model XTF5011 X-ray Tube information, Jun. 1998, 3 pages. |
Parrill et al., “GISAXS—Glancing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 3 (Dec. 1993), pp. 411-417. |
PAXSCAN Flat Panel X-ray Imaging, Varian Sales Brochure, (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 11, 2004). |
Pfeiffer et al., “ Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nature Materials vol. 7, (2008), pp. 134-137. |
Pfeiffer et al., “Hard x-ray phase tomography with low brilliance x-ray sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 98, (2007), 108105. |
Pfeiffer et al., “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources,” Nature Physics vol. 2, (2006), pp. 258-261. |
Pfeiffer, “Milestones and basic principles of grating-based x-ray and neutron phase-contrast imaging,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 2-11. |
Pianetta et al., “Application of synchrotron radiation to TXRF analysis of metal contamination on silicon wafer surfaces,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 373(1-2), 2000, pp. 222-226. |
Potts, “Electron Probe Microanalysis”, Ch. 10 of “A Handbook of Silicate Rock Analysis” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 1987), pp. 326-382 (equation quoted from p. 336). |
Prewitt et al., “FIB Repair of 5X Recticles and Effects on IC Quality,” Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 1926 (1993), pp. 517-526. |
Prewitt et al., “Focused ion beam repair: staining of photomasks and reticles,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. vol. 26 (1993), pp. 1135-1137. |
Prewitt et al., “Gallium Staining in FIB Repair of Photomasks,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 21 (1993), pp. 191-196. |
Qin et al., “Trace metal imaging with high spatial resolution: Applications in biomedicine,” Metallomics, vol. 3 (Jan. 2011), pp. 28-37. |
Rayleigh, “On copying diffraction gratings and some phenomena connected therewith,” Philos. Mag. vol. 11 (1881), pp. 196-205. |
Renaud et al., “Probing surface and interface morphology with Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 64:8 (2009), pp. 255-380. |
Riege, “Electron Emission from Ferroelectrics—A Review”, CERN Report CERN AT/93-18 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Jul. 1993). |
Röntgen, “Ueber eine neue Art von Strahlen (Wurzburg Verlag, Warzburg, Germany, 1896) also, in English, On a New Kind of Rays,” Nature vol. 53 (Jan. 23, 1896). pp. 274-276. |
Rovezzi, “Study of the local order around magnetic impurities in semiconductors for spintronics.” PhD Dissertation, Condensed Matter, Universite Joseph-Fourier—Grenoble I, 2009, English <tel-00442852>. |
Rutishauser, “X-ray grating interferometry for imaging and metrology,” 2003, Eth Zurich, Diss. ETH No. 20939. |
Sato et al., Two-dimensional gratings-based phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray tube, 2011, Optics Letters, vol. 36, No. 18, pp. 3551-3553. |
Scherer et al., “Bi-Directional X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography,” PLoS One, vol. 9, Issue 5 (May 2014) e93502. |
Scholz, “X-ray Tubes and Monochromators,” Technical Workshop EPIV, Universität Würzburg (2007); 41 slides, 2007. |
Scholze et al., “X-ray Detectors and XRF Detection Channels,” Ch. 4 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germay, 2006), pp. 85-198. |
Scordo et al., “Pyrolitic Graphite Mosaic Drystal Thickness and Mosaicity Optimization for an Extended Source Von Hamos X-ray Spectrometer,” Condens. Matter Vo. 4, pp. 38-52 (2019). |
Scott, “Hybrid Semiconductor Detectors for High Spatial Resolution Phase-contrast X-ray Imaging,” Thesis, University of Waterloo, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2019. |
Sebert, “Flat-panel detectors:how much better are they?” Pediatr. Radiol. vol. 36 (Suppl 2), (2006), pp. 173-181. |
Seifert et al., “Talbot-Lau x-ray phase-contrast setup for fast scanning of large samples,” Sci. Rep. 9:4199, pp. 1-11 (2019). |
Shen, “Polarizing Crystal Optics,” Ch. 25 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Shields et al., “Overview of Polycapillary X-ray Optics,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (Jun. 2002), pp. 70-80. |
Shimura et al., “Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using a tabletop Talbot-Lau interferometer with multiline embedded x-ray targets”, Opt. Lett. vol. 38(2) (2013), pp. 157-159. |
Siddons, “Crystal Monochromators and Bent Crystals,” Ch. 22 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Smith, “Fundamentals of Digital Mammography:Physics, Technology and Practical Considerations,” Publication R-BI-016 (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA, Mar. 2005). |
Snigirev et al., “Hard X-Ray Microoptics,” Ch. 17 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 255-285. |
Sparks Jr., “X-ray Fluorescence Microprobe for Chemical Analysis,” in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick & S. Doniach, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, NY 1980), pp. 459-512. |
Spiller, “Multilayers,” Ch. 24 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001). |
Stampanoni et al., “The First Analysis and Clinical Evaluation of Native Breast Tissue Using Differential Phase-Contrast Mammography,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 46, pp. 801-806. pub 2011-12-xx. |
Struder et al., “Silicon Drift Detectors for X-ray Imaging,” Presentation at Detector Workshop on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, 54 slides, (Argonne Nat'l Lab, Argonne, IL Dec. 8, 2005), available at: <http://www.aps.anl.gov/News/Conferences/2005/Synchrotron_Radiation_Instrumentation/Presentations/Strueder.pdf>. |
Strüder et al., “X-Ray Detectors,” Ch. 4 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131. |
Stupple et al., “Modeling of Heat Transfer in an Aluminum X-Ray Anode Employing a Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Heat Spreader,” J. Heat Transfer, Vo. 140, 124501-1-5 (Dec. 2018). |
Sun et al., “Combined optic system based on polycapillary X-ray optics and single-bounce monocapillary optics for focusing X-rays from a conventional laboratory X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A 802 (2015) pp. 5-9. |
Sun et al., “Numerical design of in-line X-ray phase-contrast imaging based on ellipsoidal single-bounce monocapillary,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A746 (2014) pp. 33-38. |
Sunday et al., “X-ray Metrology for the Semiconductor Industry Tutorial,” J. Res. Nat'l Inst. Stan. vol. 124: 124003 (2019); https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.124.003. |
Suzuki et al., “Hard X-ray Imaging Microscopy using X-ray Guide Tube as Beam Condenser for Field Illumination,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. vol. 463 (2013): 012028. |
Suzuki, “Development of the DIGITEX Safire Cardiac System Equipped with Direct conversion Flat Panel Detector,” Digital Angio Technical Report (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan, no date, published—2004 with product release). |
Takahama, “RADspeed safire Digital General Radiography System Equipped with New Direct-Conversion FPD,” Medical Now, No. 62 (2007). |
Takeda et al., “Differential Phase X-ray Imaging Microscopy with X-ray Talbot Interferometer” Appl. Phys. Express vol. 1 (2008) 117002. |
Takeda et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Single Phase Grating”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46 (2007), pp. L89-L91. |
Takeda et al., “In vivo physiological saline-infused hepatic vessel imaging using a two-crystal-interferometer-based phase-contrast X-ray technique”, J. Synchrotron Radiation vol. 19 (2012), pp. 252-256. |
Talbot, “Facts relating to optical science No. IV,” Philos. Mag. vol. 9 (1836), pp. 401-407. |
Tanaka et al., “Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry”, Z. Med. Phys. vol. 23 (2013), pp. 222-227. |
Tang et al., “Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT): a novel appraoch for intraoperative breast cancer specimen imaging,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat. vol. 139, pp. 311-316 (2013). |
Taniguchi et al., “Diamond nanoimprint lithography,” Nanotechnology, vol. 13 (2002) pp. 592-596. |
Terzano et al., Recent advances in analysis of trace elements in environmental samples by X-ray based techniques (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 2019. |
Tkachuk et al., “High-resolution x-ray tomography using laboratory sources”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE 6318 (2006): 631810. |
Tkachuk et al., “Multi-length scale x-ray tomography using laboratory and synchrotron sources”, Microsc. Microanal. vol. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2007), pp. 1570-1571. |
Töpperwien et al., “Multiscale x-ray phase-contrast tomography in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Biomed. Op. Express, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 92-103. |
Touzelbaev et al., “Applications of micron-scale passive diamond layers for the integrated circuits and microelectromechanical systems industries,” Diamond and Rel. Mat'ls, vol. 7 (1998) pp. 1-14. |
Tsuji et al., “X-Ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Acvances,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Susses, UK 2004), Chapters 1-7. |
Udagawa, “An Introduction to In-House EXAFS Facilities,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 6, (1) (1989), pp. 20-27. |
Udagawa, “An Introduction to X-ray Absorption Fine Structure,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 11(2)(1994), pp. 30-39. |
Uehara et al., “Effectiveness of X-ray grating interferometry for non-destructive inspection of packaged devices”, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 114 (2013), 134901. |
Viermetz et al., “High resolution laboratory grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT,” Scientific Reports 8:15884 (2018). |
Vogt, “X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy: A Tool for Biology, Life Science and Nanomedicine,” Presentation on May 16, 2012 at James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA (31 slides), 2012. |
Wan et al.,“Fabrication of Multiple Slit Using Stacked-Sliced Method for Hard X-ray Talbot-Lau Interferometer”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 7412-7414. |
Wang et al., “Advantages of intermediate X-ray energies in Zernicke phase constrast X-ray microscopy,” Biotech. Adv., vol. 31 (2013) pp. 387-392. |
Wang et al., “Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography,” Nature Comm. vol. 5:3797, pp. 1-9 (2014). |
Wang, On the single-photon-counting (SPC) modes of imaging using an XFEL source, presented at IWORLD2015. |
Wang et al., “Precise patterning of diamond films for MEMS application” Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol. 127 (2002), pp. 230-233. |
Wansleben et al., “Photon flux determination of a liquid-metal jet x-ray source by means of photon scattering,” arXiv:1903.06024v1, Mar. 14, 2019. |
Weitkamp et al., “Design aspects of X-ray grating interferometry,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 84-89. |
Weitkamp et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography with a grating interferometer,” Proc. SPIE vol. 5535, (2004), pp. 137-142. |
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront diagnostics with Talbot interferometers,” International Workshop on X-Ray Diagnostics and Scientific Application of the European XFEL, Ryn, Poland, (2010), 36 slides. |
Weitkamp et al., Tomography with grating interferometers at low-brilliance sources, 2006, SPIE, vol. 6318, pp. 0S-1 to 0S-10. |
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Opt. Express vol. 13(16), (2005), pp. 6296-6304. |
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront analysis and optics characterization with a grating interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 86, (2005), 054101. |
Wen et al., “Fourier X-ray Scattering Radiography Yields Bone Structural Information,” Radiology, vol. 251 (2009) pp. 910-918. |
Wen et al., “Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,” Op. Lett. vol. 35, No. 12, (2010) pp. 1932-1934. |
Wittry et al., “Properties of fixed-position Bragg diffractors for parallel detection of x-ray spectra,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 64, pp. 2195-2200 (1993). |
Wobrauschek et al., “Energy Dispersive, X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R.A. Meyers, Ed. (Wiley 2010). |
Wobrauschek et al., “Micro XRF of light elements using a polycapillary lens and an ultra-thin window Silicon Drift Detector inside a vacuum chamber,” 2005, International Centre for Diffraction Data 2005, Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 229-235. |
Wolter, “Spiegelsysteme streifenden Einfalls als abbildende Optiken fur Rontgenstrahlen” [Grazing Incidence Reflector Systems as Imaging Optics for X-rays] Annalen der Physik vol. 445, Issue 1-2 (1952), pp. 94-114. |
Yakimchuk et al., “Ellipsoidal Concentrators for Laboratory X-ray Sources: Analytical approaches for optimization,” Mar. 22, 2013, Crystallography Reports, vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 355-364. |
Yamamoto, “Fundamental physics of vacuum electron sources”, Reports on Progress in Physics vol. 69, (2006), pp. 181-232. |
Yanagihara et al., “X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131. |
Yang et al., “Analysis of Intrinsic Stress in Diamond Films by X-ray Diffraction,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 43 (2000), pp. 151-156. |
Yashiro et al., “Distribution of unresolvable anisotropic microstructures revealed in visibility-contrast images using x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Phys. Rev. B vol. 84 (2011), 094106. |
Yashiro et al., “Hard x-ray phase-imaging microscopy using the self-imaging phenomenon of a transmission grating”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 82 (2010), 043822. |
Yashiro et al., “Theoretical Aspect of X-ray Phase Microscopy with Transmission Gratings” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 144-149. |
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging and Tomography Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in “The 10th International Conference on X-ray Microscopy Radiation Instrumentation”, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1365 (2011) pp. 317-320. |
Yashiro et al., “Efficiency of capturing a phase image using cone-beam x-ray Talbot interferometry”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 25 (2008), pp. 2025-2039. |
Yashiro et al., “On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Opt. Express (2010), pp. 16890-16901. |
Yashiro et al., “Optimal Design of Transmission Grating for X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 375-379. |
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Microscopy using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in the 10th International Conference on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1234 (2010), pp. 473-476. |
Yashiro et. al., “Hard-X-Ray Phase-Difference Microscopy Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 103 (2009), 180801. |
Yu et al., “Morphology and Microstructure of Tungsten Films by Magnetron Sputtering,” Mat. Sci. Forum, vol. 913, pp. 416-423 (2018). |
Zanette et al., “Two-Dimensional X-Ray Grating interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 105 (2010) pp. 248102-1 248102-4. |
Zeng et al., “Ellipsoidal and parabolic glass capillaries as condensers for x-ray microscopes,” Appl. Opt. vol. 47 (May 2008), pp. 2376-2381. |
Zeng et al., “Glass Monocapillary X-ray Optics and Their Applications in X-Ray Microscopy,” X-ray Optics and Microanalysis: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1221, (2010), pp. 41-47. |
Zhang et al., “Application of confocal X-ray fluorescence based on capillary X-ray optics in nondestructively measuring the inner diameter of monocapillary optics,” Optics Comm. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.11.064. |
Zhang et al., “Fabrication of Diamond Microstructures by Using Dry and Wet Etching Methods”, Plasma Science and Technology vol. 15(6) (Jun. 2013), pp. 552-554. |
Zhang et al., “Measurement of the inner diameter of monocapillary with confocal X-ray scattering technology based on capillary X-ray optics,” Appl. Opt. (Jan. 8, 2019), doc ID 351489, pp. 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190302042 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62651883 | Apr 2018 | US |