The present invention relates generally to the field of integrated circuit (IC) manufacture, and in particular to methods for reducing parasitic capacitance caused by dummy metals embedded in a semiconductor substrate.
A related application is “Structure to Measure Both Interconnect Resistance and Capacitance”, Ser. No. 10/759,400, filed Jan. 16, 2004 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Low resistivity metals like copper and low permittivity (low-k) dielectric materials are widely used in IC manufacture to improve a circuit's performance. FIG. 1 of the above-referenced patent application illustrates the major steps of forming copper interconnects in a layer of low-k dielectric material (e.g., SiOC-based) which is on top of the surface of a semiconductor substrate. One of the steps is chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP), a process using an abrasive, corrosive slurry to planarize the surface of the copper interconnnects and the dielectric layer. The copper interconnnects left in the trenches in the dielectric layer are responsible for transmitting signals into and out of the circuit.
Due to the difference in hardness between the dielectric material and copper, CMP often causes a dishing effect on the top surface of a copper interconnect in which the top surface becomes concave. Moreover, two copper interconnects having same or the similar dimensional parameters (e.g., width and thickness) may have significantly different dishing effects and therefore different cross-sectional areas depending upon their respective locations and surrounding environments in the dielectric layer. This variation in cross-sectional area may lead to a variation in sheet resistance and parasitic capacitance from one interconnect to another, which may have an adverse impact on the performance of the circuit.
a) and 1(b) are a cross-sectional view and a top view of a structure in which the uniformity of dishing effect is improved by inserting metal regions between interconnect metal lines in different dielectric layers that are stacked on a semiconductor substrate. Following the practice in the art, these regions will be referred hereinafter as “dummy metals”. The cross-sectional view depicts three dielectric layers A, B and C stacked one on top of the other above a semiconductor substrate (not shown), each layer having multiple interconnect metal lines such as ground (“Gnd”) and signal (“Sgn”) lines. To reduce the variation in dishing effect, multiple dummy metals identified as
Unfortunately, there is a side effect associated with the insertion of dummy metals in the dielectric layers. Referring again to
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the invention, first and second pluralities of trenches are formed in the dielectric layer on top of a semiconductor substrate. At least one of the second plurality of trenches is substantially shallower than the first plurality of trenches. The first and second pluralities of trenches are then filled with a conductive layer and the conductive layer and the dielectric layer are planarized. Consequently, a set of interconnect metal lines is formed in the first plurality of trenches in which the interconnect metal lines are thicker than the dummy metals formed in the second plurality of trenches.
An integrated circuit of the present invention includes a semiconductor substrate and multiple dielectric layers stacked on the substrate. Multiple interconnect metal lines and dummy metals are embedded in the dielectric layers. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of the dummy metals is substantially thinner than the interconnect metal lines.
The aforementioned aspects of the invention as well as additional aspects will be more clearly understood as a result of the following detailed description of the various embodiments of the invention when taken in conjunction with the drawings. Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
a) and 1(b) are a cross-sectional view and a top view illustrating a prior art structure for improving the uniformity of dishing effect by inserting dummy metals into dielectric layers stacked on top of a semiconductor substrate.
a) and 2(b) are a cross-sectional view and a top view illustrating a structure for reducing parasitic capacitance caused by dummy metals in the dielectric layers in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
a)-3(f) are block diagrams illustrating a first embodiment of the present invention of forming dummy metals that are thinner than interconnect metal lines in a dielectric layer.
a)-4(d) are diagrams illustrating a second embodiment of the present invention of forming dummy metals that are thinner than interconnect metal lines in a dielectric layer.
a) and 5(b) are block diagrams illustrating a third embodiment of the present invention of forming dummy metals that are thinner than interconnect metal lines in a dielectric layer.
a)-6(c) are block diagrams illustrating an etching scheme applicable to the third embodiment of the present invention.
a) and 2(b) are a cross-sectional view and a top view of a structure for reducing parasitic capacitance caused by dummy metals in the dielectric layers stacked on a substrate surface in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. The dummy metals are electrically insulated from the interconnect metal lines, which are electrically connected to at least one semiconductor component in the substrate. The circuit structure shown in
Advantageously, the layout of the dummy metals and the interconnect lines in
One way to increase the inter-layer distance between an interconnect metal line and a dummy metal is to make a trench hosting the dummy metal shallower than the trenches hosting regular interconnect metal lines.
As shown in
As shown in
The effects of the invention will be observed for any reduction in the depth of the trenches that host the dummy metals. In some embodiments, the depth of the second set of trenches is only 50% of the depth of the first set of trenches. In such embodiments, the parasitic capacitance caused by dummy metals can be reduced by at least 10%. Even greater reductions in parasitic capacitance can be achieved for greater reductions in the depth of the trenches hosting the dummy metals up to the limits set by the process used to form the metal interconnect lines and dummy regions. In some embodiments, the depth of the trenches hosting the dummy metals is as small as only 30% of the depth of the trenches hosting the interconnect metal lines.
Next, as shown in
Alternatively, the photoresist mask 130 is first used for creating a set of trenches 127 to host the dummy metals. Next, the photoresist mask 110 is used for creating a set of trenches 125 to host the interconnect metal lines.
In a second embodiment shown in
Next, a photoresist mask 160 is formed on the dielectric layer 120 as shown in
Both the aforementioned two embodiments require the formation of two photoresist masks on the dielectric layer to create two sets of trenches having different depths. In contrast, the third embodiment discussed below needs only one photoresist mask.
As shown in
Because of the sub-openings associated with the openings 177, the etching rate at the openings 177 is lower than that at the openings 175; and after being etched by an etchant for a predetermined time period, the trenches 125 are deeper than the trenches 127 as shown in
a) provides enlarged views of a pair of openings 177 and 175 shown in
As the critical dimension and thickness of the dielectric layers of an integrated circuit continues to diminish, the parasitic capacitance caused by dummy metals is an increasingly important issue affecting the circuit's performance. This issue is even more critical in an analog IC because it is more sensitive to the variation in interconnect sheet resistance and parasitic capacitance. It is therefore apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention will become more valuable with the advance of semiconductor processing technology.
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been set forth with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. While some reordering or other groupings are specifically mentioned above, others will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and so do not present an exhaustive list of alternatives.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5459093 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5604156 | Chung et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5741741 | Tseng | Apr 1998 | A |
| 6001733 | Huang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6184121 | Buchwalter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6319834 | Erb et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323117 | Noguchi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6436807 | Cwynar et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6492259 | Dirahoui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6627539 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6717267 | Kunikiyo | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6961915 | Loh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7030022 | Jung et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7071009 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7163870 | Koubuchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7217649 | Bailey et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 20010027008 | Matsumoto | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020110759 | Lin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020167072 | Andosca | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030027425 | Kawanishi | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151080 | Hurley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040023499 | Hellig et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029385 | Manger et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053505 | Chin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040058508 | Parat et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040084777 | Yamanoue et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040089924 | Yuasa et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092115 | Hsieh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20050170661 | Economikos et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060197228 | Daubenspeck et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |