Patent Grant
9109188
The present invention relates generally to chemical formulations useful in semiconductor manufacturing and particularly to chemical formulations that are utilized to remove residue from wafers following a resist plasma ashing step. More specifically, the present invention relates to cleaning formulations for removal of inorganic residue from semiconductor wafers containing delicate copper interconnecting structures.
The prior art teaches the utilization of various chemical formulations to remove residues and clean wafers following a resist ashing step. Some of these prior art chemical formulations include alkaline compositions containing amines and/or tetraalkyl ammonium hydroxides, water and/or other solvents, and chelating agents. Still other formulations are based on acidic to neutral solutions containing ammonium fluoride.
The various prior art formulations have drawbacks that include unwanted removal of metal or insulator layers and the corrosion of desirable metal layers, particularly copper or copper alloys features. Some prior art formulations employ corrosion inhibiting additives to prevent undesirable copper metal corrosion during the cleaning process. However, conventional corrosion-inhibiting additives typically have detrimental effects on the cleaning process because such additives interact with the residue and inhibit dissolution of such residue into the cleaning fluid. Moreover, conventional additives do not easily rinse off the copper surface after completion of the cleaning process. Such additives therefore remain on the surface sought to be cleaned, and result in contamination of the integrated circuits. Contamination of the integrated circuit can adversely increase the electrical resistance of contaminated areas and cause unpredictable conducting failure within the circuit.
The formulation of post CMP cleaners for advanced integrated circuit manufacturing such as copper and tungsten interconnect materials, includes slurry removal and residue dissolution components that accelerate the physical cleaning process. However, these conventional additives typically have detrimental effects on the metal surface by increasing resistance and corrosion sensitivity.
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide chemical formulations that effectively remove residue following a resist ashing step, and which do not attack and potentially degrade delicate structures intended to remain on the wafer.
It is another object of the present invention to replace conventional additives with an improved corrosion inhibitor for protection of copper structures on the semiconductor substrate.
It is another object of the invention to provide an improved corrosion inhibitor, which is easily rinsed off the substrate by water or other rinse medium after the completion of the residue-removal process, thereby reducing contamination of the integrated circuit.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become fully apparent from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.
The present invention relates generally to chemical formulations useful in semiconductor manufacturing for removing residue from wafers following a resist plasma ashing step.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a method of removing residue from a wafer following a resist plasma ashing step on such wafer, comprising contacting the wafer with a cleaning formulation, including (i) a fluoride source, (ii) at least one organic amine, (iii) a nitrogen-containing carboxylic acid or an imine, (iv) water, and optionally at least one metal chelating agent.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a wafer cleaning formulation, including (i) a fluoride source, (ii) at least one organic amine, (iii) a nitrogen-containing carboxylic acid or an imine, (iv) water, and optionally at least one metal chelating agent.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a semiconductor wafer cleaning formulation for use in post plasma ashing semiconductor fabrication, comprising the following components in the percentage by weight (based on the total weight of the formulation) ranges shown:
In a still further aspect, the invention relates to a formulation useful for post chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) cleaning, which is a dilute version of the wafer cleaning formulation outlined hereinabove, wherein the dilute formulation comprises: (i) a fluoride source, (ii) at least one organic amine, (iii) 70% to 98% water, and optionally at least one metal chelating agent and optionally a nitrogen-containing carboxylic acid or an imine.
Such formulations of the invention effectively remove inorganic residues following a plasma ashing and/or CMP step.
Such formulations also effectively remove metal halide and metal oxide residues following plasma ashing, and effectively remove slurry particles of aluminum oxides and other oxides remaining after CMP (chemical mechanical polishing).
The formulations of the present invention provide better stripping performance with less corrosivity than formulations containing either ammonium fluoride or amines. Formulations in accordance with the invention also provide better stripping performance at lower processing temperatures than conventional amine-containing formulations.
The formulations of the invention utilize a chelating agent, which may be a single-component chelating agent or a multicomponent-chelating agent, to prevent metal corrosion and increase stripping effectiveness.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.
The formulations of the present invention are suitable for stripping inorganic wafer residues deriving from high-density plasma etching followed by ashing with oxygen-containing plasmas. Such formulations, in dilute form, are also suitable for removing slurry particles of aluminum oxides and other oxides remaining after CMP (chemical mechanical polishing).
The formulations advantageously contain (i) a fluoride source, such as ammonium fluoride and/or derivative(s) of ammonium fluoride, (ii) an amine or mixture of amines, (iii) a nitrogen-containing carboxylic acid or imine, (iv) water, and, optionally and preferably, (v) one or more metal chelating agents.
As used herein, a fluoride source refers to a compound or a mixture of compounds that in the aqueous cleaning formulation provides fluorine anions.
The preferred formulations for post etch removal include the following components in the percentage by weight (based on the total weight of the formulation) ranges shown:
The preferred formulations for post CMP cleaning include the following components in the percentage by weight (based on the total weight of the formulation) ranges shown:
The components of the formulation as described above can be of any suitable type or species, as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art. Specific illustrative and preferred formulation components for each of the ingredients of the formulation are described below.
Particularly preferred amines include one or more of the following:
Other amines that are highly advantageous include:
Fluoride sources useful in the present invention include any combination of ammonia gas or ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen fluoride gas or hydrofluoric acid. Specific preferred fluoride sources include, but are not limited to one or more of the following:
Other fluoride sources that are highly advantageous include:
Specific preferred nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids and imines include one or more of the following:
Other nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids or imines advantageously utilizable in formulations of the invention include:
Specific preferred metal chelating agents include:
The combination of ammonium fluoride or a substituted fluoride source, as described above, with an amine (other than an amine present as a surfactant in an amount of 1% or less) provides better stripping performance with less corrosivity than formulations containing either ammonium fluoride or amines alone. In addition, the resulting alkaline solutions are effective at lower processing temperatures (e.g., 21°-40° C.) than conventional amine-containing formulations.
The presence of nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids and/or imines enables formulations of the invention to be remarkably effective in stripping residues from semiconductor substrate surfaces containing delicate copper structures.
The nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids or imines provide functional groups that are specifically attracted to free copper atoms. As shown schematically in
Moreover, as shown by
The use of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds as chelating agents and to prevent metal corrosion is a preferred feature of the inventive formulations, to increase their effectiveness.
In various prior art formulations, amines are present in amounts of 1% or less of the formulation as surfactants, or otherwise are not utilized as formulation ingredients at all. Additionally, the prior art formulations are acidic (pH<7) in character. In preferred formulations of the present invention, the amines are present as major components of the formulation, are highly effective in stripping action, and yield formulations of a basic pH character (pH>7).
The formulations of the invention may include a wide variety of organic amines, substituted ammonium fluorides, and nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids, other than those specifically exemplified. Particular substituted ammonium fluorides of suitable character include those of the general formula, R1R2R3R4NF in which each of the respective R species is independently selected from hydrogen and aliphatic groups. Suitable nitrogen-containing carboxylic acids include those of the general structure COOH—CH2—NRR′, wherein R and R′ are each independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, and carboxylic acid moieties. Suitable metal chelating agents include 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds of the general structure X—CHR—Y. In compounds of such formula, R is either a hydrogen atom or an aliphatic group, e.g., C1-C8 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, etc. X and Y may be the same as or different from one another, and are functional groups containing multiply-bonded moieties with electron-withdrawing properties, as for example CONH2, CONHR′, CN, NO2, SOR′, or SO2Z, in which R′ represents a C1-C8 alkyl group and Z represents another atom or group, e.g., hydrogen, halo or C1-C8 alkyl.
Other chelating agent species useful in the compositions of the invention include amine trifluoroacetates of the general formula, R1R2R3R4N+ −O2CCF3 in which each of the R groups is independently selected from hydrogen and aliphatic groups, e.g., C1-C8 alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, etc.
The formulations of the invention optionally may also include such components as surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, buffering agents, and co-solvents, as useful or desired in a given end use application of formulations of the invention.
Formulations in accordance with the present invention are particularly useful on wafers that have been etched with chlorine- or fluorine-containing plasmas, followed by oxygen plasma ashing. The residues generated by this type of processing typically contain metal oxides. Such residues are often difficult to dissolve completely without causing corrosion of metal and titanium nitride features required for effective device performance. Also, metal oxide and silicon oxide slurry particles remaining after CMP will also be effectively removed by formulations in accordance with the present invention.
The features and advantages of the invention are more fully shown by the following non-limiting examples.
Copper-specific corrosion inhibitors including either hydrogen-containing carboxylic acids or imines were tested in two different types of alkaline cleaning formulations, with the following components and characteristics.
The copper etch rate was determined by a standard four-point probe technique. Addition of corrosion inhibitors in accordance with the present invention significantly slowed down the copper etch rate, as shown by the following table, and effectively prevented undesirable corrosion during the cleaning process:
A contamination test was carried out on Formulation 2 containing iminodiacetic acid inhibitor. The semiconductor wafer to be cleaned contained copper and silicon films. After the completion of the cleaning operation, the wafer was rinsed by deionized water at 25° C. for about 15 minutes. The Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry data (SIMS) obtained are as follows:
The foregoing results show that the copper oxide CuxO has been effectively removed by the cleaning process, while carbon contamination, which is mainly caused by the organic corrosion inhibitors in the cleaning formulation, has been greatly reduced.
The present invention employs dilute alkaline fluoride in compositions for post CMP cleaning of silicon oxide or aluminum oxide particles from metallic surfaces such as copper or tungsten.
Formulations that have been found to be effective in cleaning residue and slurry particles from metal surfaces may have a pH value in a range for from about 3 to 11, but typically have pH values between about 7 and about 9. These formulations generally are aqueous solutions that comprise a fluoride source, an organic amine, and metal chelating agent. The individual constituents typically constitute a fluoride source and/or a derivative thereof as about 0.1 to about 5.0% of the formulation, wherein the fluoride may be one of many such fluoride sources known to those skilled in the art including one or more of:
The organic amine or mixture of two amines typically comprises between about 1% and about 15% of the formulation of the present invention, wherein the organic amine can be one of many such organic amines known to those skilled in the art including:
The nitrogenous component of the mixture typically comprises 0 to about 10% of the mixture. wherein the nitrogenous component may be one of many such nitrogenous component sources known to those skilled in the art including one or more of:
The metal chelating agent or mixture of chelating agents typically comprises about 0 to about 5.0% of the formulation. Typical metal chelating agent may be one of many such metal chelating agents known to those skilled in the art including:
Several representative examples of formulations are:
Wafers can be immersed in chemical solutions or chemicals can be applied to the wafer surface by spray or through a brush scrubbing system.
While the invention has been described herein with reference to specific features, aspects, and embodiments, it will be appreciated that the invention is not thus limited. The invention therefore may correspondingly embodied in a wide variety of compositions, with corresponding variations of ingredients, and end-use applications. The invention therefore is to be understood as encompassing all such variations, modifications and alternative embodiments, within the spirit and scope of the invention as hereafter claimed.
This application is a continuation application claiming benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/581,843 filed Oct. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,263,694, which is a continuation application claiming benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/135,892 filed May 24, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,605,113, which is a continuation application claiming benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/047,554 filed Oct. 23, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,826, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/818,073 filed Mar. 27, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,989, which in turn claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/924,021 filed on Aug. 29, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,785, which in turn claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/044,824 filed Apr. 25, 1997 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/034,194 filed Jan. 9, 1997, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4087367 | Rioult et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4113551 | Bassous et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4165295 | Vander Mey | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4215005 | Vander Mey | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4349411 | Okinaka | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4371443 | Keeney | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4529450 | Panayappan | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4569722 | Maury et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4582624 | Enjo et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4599175 | Yamamizu et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4765844 | Merrem et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4785137 | Samuels | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4795582 | Ohmi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4863563 | Scardera et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4871422 | Scardera et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4921572 | Roche | May 1990 | A |
| 4964919 | Payne | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5051212 | Culshaw et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5091103 | Dean et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5094701 | Norman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5219484 | Krulik | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5241118 | Saxton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5277835 | Ohmi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5308745 | Schwartzkopf | May 1994 | A |
| 5320709 | Bowden et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334332 | Lee | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5421906 | Borah | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5453401 | Grivna et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5466389 | Ilardi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5498293 | Ilardi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5509970 | Shiramizu | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512201 | Singh et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5556833 | Howe | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5560857 | Sakon et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561105 | Honda | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571447 | Ward et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5618645 | Nakano et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5630904 | Aoyama et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5645628 | Endo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5662769 | Schonauer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5669980 | McNeil et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5698503 | Ward et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5709756 | Ward et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5733377 | Howe | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5780406 | Honda et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5856062 | Hoshi | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5885362 | Morinaga et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5962385 | Maruyama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972862 | Torii et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989353 | Skee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6030932 | Leon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6080709 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6136714 | Schutz | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6224785 | Wojtczak et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235693 | Cheng et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6255266 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6280651 | Wojtczak et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6323168 | Kloffenstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6344432 | Wojtczak et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6383410 | Wojtczak et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387821 | Aoki | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391794 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6420329 | Callaghan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440856 | Bessho et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6465403 | Skee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6492311 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6531071 | Bedge | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537381 | Mikhaylich et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6566315 | Wojtczak et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6660700 | Wojtczak et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6755989 | Wojtczak et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6896826 | Wojtczak et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6967169 | Wojtczak et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7605113 | Wojtczak et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7662762 | Wojtczak et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7807613 | Rovito et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20010006936 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010008141 | Lee | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020034874 | Aoki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066465 | Gotoh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 153308 | Dec 1981 | DE |
| 0317542 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 680078 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| 812011 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 2287827 | Sep 1995 | GB |
| 07-297158 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 8250461 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 08306651 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 09-062013 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 2001064688 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001051429 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2002050607 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002299300 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 9800244 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| 0066697 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Noguchi, et al.; “Kinki Aruminyumu Hyomen Shori Kenkyuaki Kaishi,” 1996, 179, 3-8, See Abstract. |
| Chinese State Intellectual Property Office, Second Office Action, Oct. 13, 2010, Chinese Patent Application No. 200810178886.3. |
| Japan Patent Office, Office Action, Nov. 22, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130072411 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60044824 | Apr 1997 | US | |
| 60034194 | Jan 1997 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12581843 | Oct 2009 | US |
| Child | 13658415 | US | |
| Parent | 11135892 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 12581843 | US | |
| Parent | 10047554 | Oct 2001 | US |
| Child | 11135892 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09818073 | Mar 2001 | US |
| Child | 10047554 | US | |
| Parent | 08924021 | Aug 1997 | US |
| Child | 09818073 | US |
