Patent Grant
11899042
This specification relates generally to automated test systems and components thereof.
System-level testing (SLT) involves testing an entire device, rather than individual components of the device. If the device passes a battery of system-level tests, it is assumed that the individual components of the device are operating properly. SLT has become more prevalent as the complexity of, and number of components in, devices have increased. For example, a chip-implemented system, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), may be tested on a system level in order to determine that components that comprise the system are functioning correctly.
An example test system includes packs. The packs include test sockets for testing devices under test (DUTs) and at least some test electronics for performing tests on the DUTs in the test sockets. Different packs are configured to have different configurations. The different configurations include at least different numbers of test sockets arranged at different pitches. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The example test system may include pick-and-place automation configured to move the DUTs into and out of the test sockets. The pick-and-place automation may be configured at least to service the packs having different configurations. The pick-and-place automation may be configurable to transport different types of DUTs. The pick-and-place automation may be configurable based on test time and throughput.
Each of the packs may be modular and can be moved into and out of—for example, completely out of—the test system during operation of the pick-and-place automation on test sockets contained on a different pack. A pack may include one or more rows, with each row containing one or more test sockets. Each test socket may be associated with an actuator to place a lid over the test socket or to remove the lid from the test socket. At least two of the rows of a pack may be configurable to hold different types of DUTs. One or more of the packs—for example each pack—may be configured to hold and to test different types of DUTs.
The test system may include a cool atrium that houses the test sockets and that is supplied with cooled air, and a warm atrium arranged to receive air from the cool atrium that has been warmed as a result of testing the DUTs. The warm atrium may be one of multiple warm atriums, with each warm atrium being for a different pack. The test system may include an air-to-liquid heat exchanger to produce the cool air from circulated warm air from the warm atrium, and one or more fans to move the cool air into the cool atrium. The test system may include an ionized air supply and one or more fans to move ionized air from the ionized air supply over at least some of the test sockets. The test system may include a thermal control system to independently and asynchronously control a temperature of individual test sockets.
As noted, the pick-and-place automation may be configured to move the DUTs into and out of the test sockets and the pick-and-place automation may be configured at least to service the different configurations of the packs. The pick-and-place automation system may include pickers for picking DUTs from the test sockets and/or placing the DUTs into the test sockets and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the test sockets to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the test sockets or placing the DUTs into the test sockets. The pickers may be operable independently and simultaneously. The pickers and gantry are robotics for the test system and may be arranged in a layer above the test sockets The pickers and gantry may be the only robotics for the test system that are arranged in the layer above the test sockets. The test system may include trays having cells for holding at least one of DUTs to be tested or DUTs that have been tested. The pickers may be configured to pick the DUTs to be tested from the trays and to place the DUTs to be tested in the test sockets, and to pick the DUTs that have been tested from the test sockets and to place the DUTs that have been tested into the trays.
The test system may include a housing in which the pickers and the gantry are mounted and in which the packs are held. A pack may be movable into or out of the housing during operation of the pick-and-place automation on a different one of the packs. The pickers may be operable independently in four degrees of freedom. The pickers may each be operable independently in four degrees of freedom.
Testing performed on the DUTs by the test system may include system-level tests. A first one of the packs may include one or more test sockets and a second one of the packs may include two or more test sockets. The different configurations may accommodate different types of DUTs in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having different form factors in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having different electrical interfaces in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having different thermal requirements in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having different physical interfaces in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having different wireless functionalities in the test system at a same time. The different configurations may support different types of DUTs having electro-mechanical interfaces in the test system at a same time.
An example test system includes a test socket for testing a DUT, a lid for the test socket, and an actuator configured to force the lid onto the test socket and to remove the lid from the test socket. The actuator includes an upper arm to move the lid, an attachment mechanism connected to the upper arm to contact the lid, where the attachment mechanism is configured to allow the lid to float relative to the test socket to enable alignment between the lid and the test socket, and a lower arm to anchor the actuator to a board containing the test socket. The actuator is configured to move the upper arm linearly towards and away from the test socket and to rotate the upper arm towards and away from the test socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The attachment mechanism may include one or more springs between the upper arm and the lid and a gimbal connected to the upper arm and arranged to contact a stop plate that connects to the lid and that limits movement of the lid. The lid may be, or be part of, a lid assembly that includes alignment pins to align the lid assembly to complementary holes associated with the test socket. The lid assembly may include a cap to contact the DUT, a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) in contact with the cap, a thermally-conductive plate in contact with the TEC, and the stop plate in contact with the thermally-conductive plate. The stop plate may be configured to make contact with a frame of the test socket when the actuator forces the lid onto the test socket.
The lid assembly may include a coolant line to bring liquid coolant to the thermally-conductive plate and a spring between the stop plate and the thermally-conductive plate. The lid assembly may include one or more heaters thermally connected to the thermally-conductive plate. The one or more heaters may be controllable to increase in temperature. The test system may also include a first temperature sensor at the cap to detect a temperature proximate to the DUT and a second temperature sensor at the cap to detect a temperature at the cap that is farther away from the DUT than the temperature detected by the first temperature sensor.
The upper arm may be part of an assembly that includes cable grommets to hold conduits that route at least one of electrical signals or liquid coolant to and from the lid.
The attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to float in multiple degrees of freedom—for example, using the gimbal and spring. In examples, the attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to float in at least three degrees of freedom, the attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to float in at least four degrees of freedom, the attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to float in at least five degrees of freedom, or the attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to float in six degrees of freedom. During float, the attachment mechanism may be configured to allow the lid to move in a single dimension by an amount measured in triple-digit microns (single-digit millimeters) or less.
The lid may include a lid assembly. The lid assembly may include a TEC in thermal communication with the DUT, a thermally-conductive structure in contact with the TEC, and a stop structure such as the stop plate in contact with the thermally-conductive structure. The stop structure is configured to make contact with the frame of the test socket when the actuator forces the lid onto the test socket.
The test system may include an enclosure around the test socket. The enclosure may have an opening to allow the actuator to force the lid onto the test socket and to remove the lid from the test socket. The actuator may be configured to hold a cover to close the opening to hermetically seal the enclosure and to thermally isolate the enclosure when the opening is closed or plugged by the cover. The actuator may be configured to move the cover over the opening when the actuator forces the lid onto the test socket. The enclosure may include a port that is connectable to a vacuum source or to a gas source. The test socket may include one or more fins that extend upward and/or downward from the test socket for heat dissipation.
An example test system may include a test socket for testing a DUT, a lid for the test socket, and an actuator configured to force the lid onto the test socket and to remove the lid from the test socket. The actuator includes an upper arm to hold the lid and a lower arm to anchor the actuator to a board containing the test socket. The actuator is controllable based on proper placement of the DUT in the test socket to rotate the upper arm toward the test socket and to force the upper arm holding the lid towards the test socket in order to force the lid onto the test socket and against the DUT in the test socket.
An example method of placing a lid on a test socket of a test system includes the following operations: roughly aligning the lid and the test socket; following rough alignment, finely aligning the lid to the test socket by moving a cap of the lid over a complementary portion of the test socket containing a DUT; moving the lid downward into the test socket so that the cap contacts the DUT while the lid floats relative to the test socket, where floating includes multi-dimensional movement of the lid relative to the test socket; continuing to move the lid downward thereby forcing the lid against the DUT until a stop plate prevents further movement; and retaining the lid forced against the test socket during testing of the DUT by the test system. The example method may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
Roughly aligning may include rotating the lid into position over the test socket such that alignment pins associated with the lid align to corresponding alignment sockets on the test socket. Finely aligning may include adjusting a position the lid so that the lid is properly aligned to at least one of the DUT or the test socket.
An example test system includes test sites that include test sockets for testing DUTs and pickers for picking DUTs from the test sockets and/or for placing the DUTs into the test sockets. Each picker may include a picker head for holding a DUT. The test system also includes a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the test sites to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the test sockets or placing the DUTs into the test sockets. The test sockets are arranged in at least one array that is accessible to the pickers on the gantry. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The gantry may include a beam that spans across the at least one array of test sockets and that is configured to move over the at least one array of test sockets in a direction perpendicular to the beam. The pickers may be arranged linearly along the beam and may be configured to move linearly along the beam. The pickers may be controllable to move linearly along the beam to change a pitch of the pickers along the beam. The pickers may be controllable to move linearly along the beam to change the pitch while the beam moves over the at least one array of test sockets in the direction perpendicular to the beam.
The test system may include packs that include the test sockets and at least some test electronics for performing tests on the DUTs in the test sockets. Different packs are configurable to have different configurations. The different configurations may include at least different numbers of test sockets arranged at different pitches. The pickers may be controllable to move linearly along the beam to change the pitch to match pitches of different sets of test sockets in different packs installed in the test system. The pickers may be configured to service multiple test sockets simultaneously, where servicing may include at least one of placing DUTs into the multiple test sockets or picking DUTs from the multiple test sockets. One or more of the pickers may be configured, through servo-control, to move at least partly perpendicularly or obliquely relative to the beam in order to finely align with one or more respective test sockets. Such movement is referred to as the Y-axis jog, as described herein.
The test system may include one or more temperature sensors configured to sense a temperature of at least one of the gantry or the test sockets and a control system that is servo-based to change a position of one or more of the pickers to compensate for thermal expansion of at least one of the gantry or the test sockets. The test system may include an encoder scale attached to a frame such as a force frame of the test system, and an encoder reader attached to the gantry. The control system is configured to identify vibrations in the test system based on an output of the encoder reader and to control operation of the test system to counteract the vibrations.
As noted, the test system may include packs that include the test sockets and at least some test electronics for performing tests on the DUTs in the test sockets. Different packs are configurable to have different configurations for DUTs having different characteristics. The pickers are controllable, and a number of the pickers is scalable, based on characteristics of the packs and/or the test sockets in the packs.
Each picker head may include a nozzle to hold a DUT using at least vacuum pressure. Examples of nozzles include, but are not limited to, of the following: a soft polymer vacuum cup that includes electrostatic-discharge (ESD) dissipative material, a hard plastic tip that includes ESD dissipative material, a hard material that includes an integrated ejection collar to accommodate roll and pitch changes of a DUT, or a soft polymer vacuum cup that includes an integrated ejection collar configured to reduce stiction between the nozzle and the DUT.
The test system may include a feeder configured to hold trays having cells for holding at least some DUTs to be tested or at least some DUTs that have been tested. The pickers may be configured to pick the DUTs to be tested from some of the cells and to place the DUTs that have been tested into others of the cells. The trays may be arranged in a plane that is parallel to, or a co-planar with, a plane in which at least some (for example, some or all) of the test sockets are arranged.
The gantry that holds the pickers in the test system may include a first beam that spans across the at least one array of test sockets and that is configured to move relative to the test sockets and a second beam that spans across the at least one array of test sockets and that is configured to move relative to the test sockets. One or more of the pickers may be arranged linearly along the first beam and one or more of the pickers may be arranged linearly along the second beam. The gantry that holds the pickers may be a main gantry and the test system may also include a LASER cleaning assembly and an auxiliary gantry built onto a same bearing system as the main gantry. The LASER cleaning assembly may be connected to the auxiliary gantry. The auxiliary gantry may be configured to move the LASER cleaning assembly relative to the test sockets in order to clean the test sockets using LASER light.
A pack in the test system may include test sockets and at least some test electronics for performing tests on the DUTs in the test sockets. The pack may be one of multiple different packs that are installed in the test system and that support at least one of different types of DUTs, different configurations of DUTs, different numbers of DUTs, DUTs having different physical interfaces, DUTs having different electrical interfaces, DUTs having different form factors, or DUTs having different sizes. A control system may be configured to control the auxiliary gantry and the LASER cleaning assembly to clean the test sockets while the pack is installed in the test system.
The pickers may be controllable to move in three or more degrees of freedom relative to the test sockets. The three or more degrees of freedom may include left-right, forward-backward, up-down, and rotation. The test system may include a machine vision system configured to detect placement of a DUT in a test socket, a picker holding a DUT, and a configuration and orientation of a test socket. The gantry may have a settling time that is at most +/−10 microns in less than 20 milliseconds.
The pickers may be or include linear actuators. Each linear actuator may be configured to extend or to retract a respective picker head. When a picker head is retracted, the picker has sufficient clearance to pass over the test sockets including when the test sockets contain DUTs. Each picker may be configured for linear movement along part of the gantry to adjust for different center-to-center distances between DUTs in the test sockets or DUTs in trays included in the test system. Linear magnetic motors may be controlled by the control system to position the gantry for DUT pick-up, placement, and measurement operations. Linear magnetic motors may be controlled by the control system to position the pickers perpendicularly or obliquely to motion of the gantry for DUT pick-up, placement, and measurement operations.
An example test system includes test sites that include sockets for testing DUTs, pickers for picking DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs in the sockets, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry is configured to move the pickers relative to the test sites to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the sockets or for placing the DUTs into the sockets. The test system also includes one or more LASER range finders mounted on the gantry for movement over the DUTs in the sockets and in conjunction with movement of the pickers. A LASER range finder among the one or more LASER range finders mounted on the gantry is configured to detect a distance to a DUT placed into a socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
A control system may be configured to determine a plane of the DUT based on multiple distances detected by the LASER range finder, and to determine whether the DUT has been placed properly in the socket based on the plane of the DUT. The control system may be configured to determine whether or not to place a lid over the socket based on whether the DUT has been placed properly into the socket. The control system may be configured to control movement of the lid to be placed over the socket when the DUT has been placed properly in the socket. The control system may be configured to control the lid not to be placed over the socket when the DUT has been placed improperly in the socket.
The LASER range finder may include a one-dimensional (1D) LASER range finder. Each LASER range finder may be mounted on to a respective picker. The LASER range finder may be configured to detect distances to the DUT placed into the socket in parallel with movement of the gantry following placement of the DUT into the socket.
An example test system includes test sites that include sockets for testing DUTs, pickers for picking DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs into the sockets, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the sockets to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs into the sockets. A scanner may be configured to face the sockets and to move over the sockets. The scanner may be configured to capture three-dimensional data (3D) representing a structure of at least part of a socket. A camera may be configured to face the sockets and to move over the sockets. The scanner or camera may be configured to capture 3D representing a structure of at least part of a socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The example test system may include a control system to determine a location and an orientation of the socket based on the 3D data. The control system may be configured to determine a plane of the socket, a roll and pitch of the plane, and a height of the plane relative to a base holding the sockets. The control system may be configured to determine Cartesian X, Y, and Z coordinates of the plane and a yaw of the plane. The control system may be configured to determine the Cartesian X, Y, and Z coordinates of the plane and the yaw of the plane based on features associated with the socket. The control system may be configured to control a picker to place a DUT into the socket based on the location and orientation of the socket. The control system may be configured to control the picker to place the DUT into the socket at a precision measured in single-digit microns (μm). The 3D data may include a 3D point cloud.
An example test system includes trays that include cells for holding at least one of devices to be tested or devices that have been tested, pickers for picking the devices to be tested from the trays and for placing the devices that have been tested into the trays, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry is configured to move the pickers relative to the cells to position the pickers for picking the devices to be tested or for placing the devices that have been tested. The test system also includes a scanner configured for movement over the trays. The scanner may be configured to capture 3D representing structures of the trays and the presence or absence of devices in at least some of the cells. A control system is configured to determine, based on the 3D data, which of the cells contains devices and whether devices in the cells are placed properly. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
For a tray or each tray, the control system may be configured to perform a comparison based on 3D data for the tray and a predefined model of the model of the tray. For a tray or each, the control system may be configured to compare a representation of the tray based on the 3D data to a predefined model of the tray. Determining whether a device in a cell is placed properly may include determining whether the device in the cell is at a prescribed orientation or with an acceptable tolerance of the prescribed orientation. The 3D data may include a 3D point cloud. The scanner may include a 3D scanner mounted on a linear motorized axis over the trays. In some implementations, a 3D camera may replace the 3D scanner.
An example test system includes test sites that include sockets for testing DUTs, pickers for picking DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs in the sockets, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the sockets to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the sockets or for placing the DUTs into the sockets. The test system may also include a scanner. The scanner may be configured to face towards (e.g., upwards towards) a DUT held by a picker that is controlled to place the DUT in a socket at a test site. The scanner may be configured to capture 3D representing the picker holding the DUT prior to placement of the DUT in the socket. A control system is configured to determine, based on the 3D data, whether the DUT is properly oriented for placement in the socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The scanner may include a 3D scanner that is oriented to face upwards toward a bottom of the DUT. The scanner may be a first scanner and the 3D data may be first 3D data. The test system may also include a second scanner configured for movement over the sockets. The second scanner may be configured to capture second 3D data representing a structure of at least part of the socket. The control system may be configured to control the picker to place the DUT into the socket based on the first 3D data and the second 3D data. The control system may be configured to control the picker to place the DUT into the socket at a precision measured in single-digit microns (μm), double-digit microns, or triple-digit microns.
The 3D data may include Cartesian X, Y, and Z coordinates for the DUT being held by the picker prior to placement in the socket. The 3D data may include pitch, yaw, and roll information for the DUT being held by the picker prior to placement in the socket. The first scanner and/or the second scanner may be fixed in place.
An example test system includes a strobe light, test sites that include sockets for testing DUTs, pickers for picking DUTs from the sockets and/or placing the DUTs in the sockets, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the sockets to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs into the sockets. A camera may be configured to face towards a DUT held by a picker controlled to place the DUT in a socket at the test site. The camera may be configured to capture an image of the picker holding the DUT prior to placement of the DUT in the socket. A control system may be configured to control operation of the gantry to reduce a speed of the picker as the picker approaches the camera, to control operation of the strobe light and the camera to capture an image of the picker holding the DUT prior to placement of the DUT in the socket, and to use the image to determine a position and an orientation of the DUT relative to the socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
Controlling the strobe light and the camera may include causing the strobe light to illuminate at a time that the camera is controlled to capture the image. The speed of the picker may be reduced to, or changed to, a constant speed. The test system may include a single camera to capture an image of each picker holding a DUT. The test system may include multiple cameras, each facing an underside of the DUT. Each of the multiple cameras may be associated with a different test site and may be configured to face towards a DUT held by a picker controlled to place the DUT in a socket. Each camera may be configured to capture an image of the picker holding the DUT prior to placement of the DUT in a socket of the different test site.
An example test system includes test sites that include sockets for testing DUTs, pickers for picking DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs in the sockets, and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry is configured to move the pickers relative to the test sites to position the pickers for picking the DUTs from the sockets or placing the DUTs into the sockets. A camera is configured for positioning over a socket using servo control to capture an image of the socket or of a device in the socket. A control system is configured to implement the servo control of the camera and to use the image to control placing the DUT into the socket or picking the DUT from the socket. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The camera may include a 3D camera to capture 3D image data representing at least the socket. The 3D camera may include an imaging device comprised of two or more lenses that enables perception of depth in captured images to produce a 3D image. The 3D camera may include a two-dimensional (2D) camera to capture 2D data of at least the socket and a pointing laser to capture a third dimension of data for at least the socket. The 2D data and the third dimension of the data may be the 3D image data. The 3D data from the camera may be used by the control system, along with 3D data from one or more of the preceding cameras facing an underside of the DUT, to control positioning of the DUT in the socket.
An example test system includes test sites for testing DUTs, where the test sites include a test site configured to hold a DUT for testing. The test system includes a thermal control system to control a temperature of the DUT separately from control over temperatures of other DUTs in other test sites. The thermal control system includes a TEC and a structure that is thermally conductive. The TEC is in thermal communication with the DUT to control the temperature of the DUT by transferring heat between the DUT and the structure. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
The thermal control system may include liquid coolant to flow through the structure to reduce a temperature of the structure. The thermal control system may include one or more conduits to transport the liquid coolant between the structure and a supply of the liquid coolant and one or more valves to control a flow of the liquid coolant through the one or more conduits. The liquid coolant may have a flow to each test site that is independently controllable to reduce a temperature of a DUT in each test site.
The thermal control system may include one or more temperature sensors to detect a temperature of the DUT and a control system to control the thermal control system based on active feedback of the temperature detected at the DUT. The thermal control system may include one or more heaters in thermal contact with the structure, where the one or more heaters are operable to increase a temperature of the structure.
The structure may be or include a plate and the thermal control system may include conduits to transport the liquid coolant between the plate and a supply of the liquid coolant, a valve along a conduit to control a flow of the liquid coolant through the one or more conduits, and the heaters embedded in the plate. The heaters are operable to increase a temperature of the plate.
The thermal control system may include an enclosure to house the DUT. The enclosure may be configured to enable creation of a thermal path that allows thermal conductivity between the TEC and the DUT. The enclosure may physically isolate the DUT from DUTs in other test sites. At least a combination of the liquid coolant and the physical isolation produced by the enclosure may enable the test system to test the DUT independently of, and asynchronously from, testing of other DUTs in others of the test sites. The enclosure may enable indirect contact between the TEC and the DUT.
The thermal control system may include a conduit leading from the enclosure to a vacuum source. A valve along the conduit may be controllable to open to provide vacuum from the vacuum source to the enclosure and may be controllable to close to prevent vacuum from the vacuum source from reaching the enclosure. The thermal control system may include a conduit leading from the enclosure to a purge gas source. A valve along the conduit may be controllable to open to provide a gas purge to the enclosure. The enclosure may be at least partly thermally sealed.
As noted above, the thermal control system may include one or more conduits to transport the liquid coolant between the structure that is thermally conductive and a source of the liquid coolant. The liquid coolant may be above a dew point temperature of an environment in the test system. For example, the liquid coolant may be maintained above a dew point temperature of the sealed enclosure.
The test system may include pickers for picking DUTs from the test sites and for placing the DUTs in the test sites and a gantry on which the pickers are mounted. The gantry may be configured to move the pickers relative to the test sites and to change a pitch of the pickers during movement to match a pitch of the test sites. The test system may include packs holding electronics for testing groups of the test sites. The packs may be movable into and out of the test system (for example, completely out of the test system) during movement of the gantry and the pickers. The test system may include a temperature sensor at the test site to detect a temperature at a socket of the test site; one or more temperature sensors on the gantry to detect a temperature at the gantry; and a control system to change a position of one or more of the pickers based on the temperature at the socket and the temperature at the gantry.
The thermal control systems may include (i) a heater that is controllable to heat the structure and (ii) the liquid coolant to flow through the structure to reduce a temperature of the structure. The test system may include a control system to control the heater to heat the structure during heated testing of the DUT and, following heated testing, to control a flow of the liquid coolant through the structure to cool the structure to a handling temperature. As noted, the liquid coolant being may be above a dew point temperature of an environment in the test system. The control system may control a flow of the liquid coolant through the structure while the TEC conducts heat from the DUT thereby bringing a temperature of the DUT below a predefined temperature for testing. One or more of heaters may be controllable to heat the structure as noted. The control system may be configured to control the one or more heaters to heat the structure at greater than or equal to a predefined rate for testing.
The thermal control system may be configured to control the temperature of the DUT in a range from below 0° Celsius (C) to at least 150° C.
An example method of controlling a temperature of a device under test (DUT) includes changing a temperature of a plate that is thermally conductive by controlling an amount of liquid coolant that flows through the plate, controlling a temperature of the plate by controlling operation of heaters in contact with the plate, and controlling a TEC, where the TEC transfers heat between the plate and the DUT to control the temperature of the DUT. The method may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
Controlling the amount of liquid coolant that flows through the plate may include preventing liquid coolant from flowing through the plate. Controlling operation of the heaters may include turning the heaters on to increase a temperature of the plate. The TEC may control the temperature of the DUT by transferring heat from the plate to the DUT. The operation of the heaters may be controlled to heat the DUT at a rate that is greater than or equal to a predefined rate.
Controlling the amount of liquid coolant that flows through the plate may include allowing liquid coolant to flow through the plate. Controlling operation of the heaters may include turning the heaters off to reduce or to prevent heating of the plate. The TEC may control the temperature of the DUT by transferring heat from the DUT to the plate. In an example, the liquid coolant is not below a dew point of an environment in a test system which the method is performed. The TEC may transfer an amount of heat from the DUT to the plate to cause the DUT to be below a predefined temperature during testing. The DUT may be in an enclosure that is thermally insulated from, and hermetically sealed from, other enclosures containing other DUTs. The method may include controlling a dew point temperature in a micro-environment within the enclosure and controlling a temperature of the plate so that the temperature of the plate remains above the dew point temperature in the micro-environment. The temperature of the plate and the dew point temperature may change over a range; however, over the entirety of the range, the temperature of the plate remains above the dew point temperature.
The heaters may be controlled to heat the structure to implement heated testing on the DUT. Following heated testing, the heaters may be turned-off and the liquid coolant may be controlled to flow through the structure to cool the structure down to a handling temperature.
Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including in this summary section, can be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.
The systems, techniques, and processes described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as and/or controlled by a computer program product that includes instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media, and that are executable on one or more processing devices to control (e.g., coordinate) the operations described herein. The systems, techniques, and processes described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as an apparatus, method, or electronic system that can include one or more processing devices and memory to store executable instructions to implement various operations. The systems, techniques, processes, and/or components described herein may be configured, for example, through design, construction, arrangement, placement, programming, operation, activation, deactivation, and/or control.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numerals in different figures indicate like elements.
Described herein are example implementations of a test system and components thereof. In some implementations, the test system is constrained in size, without sacrificing speed or throughput. However, the example test system described herein is not limited to any particular size, testing speed, or throughput. In some implementations, the test system is an SLT system; however, the components and features described herein may be implemented in any appropriate testing context. As noted, SLT involves testing an entire device, rather than individual components of the device. If the device passes a battery of system-level tests, it is assumed that the individual components of the device are operating properly. An overview of an example test system is provided followed by more in-depth descriptions of the various components of the test system introduced in the overview.
The example test system includes multiple subsystems. In this regard, the test system includes a frame that holds an automated gantry and primary pick-and-place automation. A tray feeder contains automation to move trays that hold devices to be tested and/or devices that have been tested into and out of the system. Packs that are movable into and out of the frame contain test electronics for testing devices held in test sockets. The packs may be movable into and out of the system during device testing. An example pack includes electrical test support infrastructure and at least one liquid-to-air heat exchanger. In some implementations, the liquid-to-air heat exchanger may be omitted from, or external to, the pack. An example pack contains one or more rows of test sockets, which are part of test sites in the test system and which hold devices under test (DUT). The test sites may each contain an end-user's test site board. The end-user's test site board contains the test socket that holds the DUT in some implementations. Each row in a pack can contain N customer test sites, where N is an integer between one and however many sites can fit in a row based on system size. Each test site may include an actuator to hold the DUT in the test socket. The actuator can be replaced as needed and to accommodate a device's force requirements.
The example test system also includes a service module that houses system infrastructure and electronics used for liquid cooling, power, and test computations and other processing. A housing, also referred to as a “skin” or “outer shell”, encloses at least part of the system and holds cool air generated by the system and circulated down across the test sites and test electronics boards. Additionally, ionized air may be circulated over the test sites before, during, and/or after testing to mitigate electrostatic charge buildup and to reduce or to prevent electrostatic discharge (ESD) events.
The layout of the example test system may be considered advantageous. For example, the test electronics, customer site electronics, and device automation can be configured in a stack. As a result, the test system can be extended to whatever length is required for a testing application, which may enable an efficient usage of the automation. Furthermore, the test system may include a single layer of pick-and-place automation to place DUTs in test sockets and to remove the DUTs from the test sockets. This single layer of pick-and-place automation may reduce the need for multiple automation exchanges found in other test systems, which may improve the test system's reliability. The site-row-pack model also may enhance system configurability and modularity and may reduce the cost of test and serviceability.
Different packs may include test sockets that are sized to hold DUTs having different characteristics, such as different sizes, interfaces, or form factors. For example, the test sockets in one pack 13a may be configured to hold DUTs that have a 10 millimeter (mm) dimension (for example, length, width, or diagonal) and test sockets in another pack 13b may be configured to hold DUTs having a 6 mm dimension. The test sockets may be organized in one or more rows, each containing one or more test sockets. In rows that contain more than one test socket, the test sockets may be arranged at different pitches. A pitch may include the distance between the centers of two adjacent test sockets. For example, the pitch may be the distance between the centers of two adjacent test sockets. The packs may also include test electronics configured to test DUTs held in the test sockets. The test electronics may be customized to test features that are unique to a DUT. The test electronics may include, but are not limited to, pin electronics, parametric measurement units, programmable logic, and/or a microcontroller or other processing device(s). The test electronics may execute, or be used to implement, one or more test routines on each DUT in a test socket.
Test system 10 includes trays 14. In some implementations, each tray includes cells for holding devices to be tested or cells for holding devices that have been tested. The cells may be sized and shaped to hold devices having different sizes, shapes, or form factors. For example, one tray may be configured to hold devices that have a 10 mm dimension and another tray may be configured to hold devices having a 6 mm dimension. In some implementations, there may be two or more trays for each different type of device being tested—for example, one tray containing devices to be tested and one tray containing devices that have been tested, or one tray containing devices to be tested, one tray containing devices that have passed testing, and one tray containing devices that have failed testing. In the example of
Test system 10 includes pick-and-place automation, which is also referred to as “pick-and-place robotics”. As shown in
Pickers are mounted on a robotic gantry (“gantry”) 20 that includes a movable gantry beam 21 that spans across an array of test sockets 15, rails 21 over which the gantry beam moves, and one or more motors (not shown) to control such movement. Gantry beam 21 is configured to move over the test sockets in the directions of arrow 23 (the Y-dimension 25), which are arranged in rows that are perpendicular to the gantry beam. Pickers 19a to 19d are arranged linearly along gantry beam 21 so that the test sockets are accessible to the pickers during system operation. The pickers are also configured to move linearly along the gantry beam to move to different locations and to change a pitch of the pickers along the gantry beam to service different types of DUTs. Accordingly, in this example, pickers 19a to 19d are configured to move in the Cartesian X dimension 26 (arrow 27) and gantry beam 21 is configured to move in the Cartesian Y dimension 25 (arrow 23). Pickers 19a to 19d thus move in a single plane that is substantially parallel to a plane or planes containing test sites 15. Pickers 19a to 19d mounted to gantry beam 21 move along with the gantry beam and are sized and operated so that, with their arms extended or retracted, the pickers clear—that is, do not touch—test sockets that are empty or full. In other words, automation 17 is configured to move anywhere within a defined work area and to pass over all sockets, regardless of the state of the socket (open or closed). This includes clearance for the pickers when they are fully retracted. Linear magnetic motors (“linear motors”), which are not shown in
In some implementations, the pickers perform picking or placing into different packs. For example, two packs on opposite sides of the system, such as packs 81b and 81d of
In
In this example, there are six pickers 31. The six pickers 31 may pick-up or remove six devices or fewer than six devices from tray 34 concurrently or in parallel. In some examples, each picker picks-up a single device; however, not every picker need pick-up a device. As shown in
As described in more detail below, each test socket includes a lid configured—for example, constructed, controlled and/or arranged—to fit over the test socket when a device (a DUT) is placed in the test socket. In example implementations, the lid rotates away from a test socket to expose the test socket and/or a device in the test socket and thereby allow a picker to place a device into the test socket or to remove a device from the test socket. After a device has been placed in the test socket, the lid is controlled to move over the test socket and to apply a force to the device in the test socket that creates, maintains, or both creates and maintains electrical and mechanical connection between the device and the test socket. For example, in
In
As shown in
In
As shown in
Devices that have been tested are removed from test sockets 61 and placed into tray 45 as shown in
However, as partially depicted in
In some implementations, a number (for example, six) DUTs to be picked-up (or locations where DUTs are to be placed) are not in the same row. As a result, the pickers would not pick or place the DUTs concurrently or in parallel. Instead, the pickers and the gantry are controlled by the control system to perform picking or placing using as many steps as needed. For example, the pickers and/or the gantry may be controlled to pick-up two DUTs in parallel on one tray row, then move to pick-up four more DUTS in parallel on a different tray row, then move to place three of those DUTs in parallel into sockets that are aligned in one row, and then move again to place the remaining three DUTs into a different set of sockets aligned in another row.
In this regard, as explained with respect to
In the examples of
The number of packs to be used may be based on DUT test time and the gantry cycle time to achieve greater tester socket utilization and/or automation gantry utilization. The pack can be fully removed from the frame, as shown with respect to
As noted, the test sockets may be configured to hold devices that are to be tested. Different packs may be configured—for example, constructed, arranged, programmed, and/or controlled—to test different types of devices. Accordingly, the test sockets may have different configurations to accommodate different types and/or numbers of devices, to support different types of devices having different form factors, to support different types of devices having different electrical interfaces, to support different types of devices having different thermal requirements, to support different types of devices having different physical interfaces, to support different types of devices having different wireless functionalities, and/or to support different types of devices having electro-mechanical interfaces. In an example, different packs may include, but are not limited to, different numbers of test sockets arranged at different pitches. Furthermore, the test sockets on an individual pack may be configured and/or reconfigured to accommodate different types and/or numbers of devices, to support different types of devices having different form factors, to support different types of devices having different electrical interfaces, to support different types of devices having different thermal requirements, to support different types of devices having different physical interfaces, to support different types of devices having different wireless functionalities, and/or to support different types of devices having electro-mechanical interfaces. Accordingly, arrays or groups of test sockets may differ across different packs or across rows or other subsections of the same pack.
By way of example,
As noted, the test electronics on a pack may include, but are not limited to, pin electronics, parametric measurement unit(s), programmable logic, and/or a microcontroller or other processing device(s). The test electronics may execute, or be used to implement, one or more test routines on devices in test sockets contained on the pack. In this regard, in some implementations, the test electronics may be customizable or reconfigurable based on the DUTs to be tested by the pack.
The interface electronics enables connection between a pack and a backplane of the test system. This connection enables communication between the test system and test electronics on the packs. Example protocols that may be supported on the connections include, but are not limited to, Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe), Universal Serial Bus (USB), and the Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) standard.
Referring to
In this regard, test system 80 may include a control system. The control system may include circuitry and/or on-board electronics 93 to control operations of test-system 80. The circuitry or on-board electronics are “on-board” in the sense that they are located within the housing of the test system itself. The on-board electronics may include, for example, one or more microcontrollers, one or more microprocessors, programmable logic such as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), one or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), solid state circuitry, or any appropriate combination of two or more of these types of circuitry or processing devices.
In some implementations, on-board components of the control system communicate with a remote computing system 95 (
The control system may include a servo controller or servo control functionality to control the position and velocity of the gantry beam and/or the pickers. An example servo controller may operate to regulate the velocities and positions of motors controlling the gantry beam and pickers based on feedback signals. In general, a servo controller executes a servo loop to generate a command to minimize an error between a commanded value and feedback value, such as a commanded velocity and feedback velocity value. The servo controller may also implement position control in addition to velocity control. To implement position control, a position loop may be added in series with the velocity loop. In some implementations, a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) position provides position and velocity control absent a separate velocity loop.
In some implementations, the control system may be implemented in or be part of a service module 96, which is shown in
As explained previously, devices to be tested and devices that have been tested are stored in trays that are serviced by the pick-and-place robotics. Example trays that may be used include, but are not limited to, Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC) trays. In the examples of
In the example of test system 10 (
The pickers described herein, such as pickers 31, may include linear magnetic motors that allow their arms to extend or to retract relative to a test socket. Each picker may include a picker nozzle that is configured to hold a device to be tested or a device that has been tested for transport between the trays and the sockets. In an example, there are six pickers configured to pick-up from one to six devices concurrently from a tray or a socket array. In other examples, however, there may be more than six pickers or fewer than six pickers. The number of pickers in the test system is scalable—for example, one or more pickers may be added to, or removed from, the test system. For example, the number of pickers may be scalable based on characteristics of the packs and on characteristics of the test sockets in the packs. For example, if a pack contains 12 test sockets in a row, the number of pickers may be a factor of 12. In this regard, the pick-and-place automation, such as the number of pickers, can be configured differently depending on DUT test time—different DUT types can take different time to test. Automation configuration does affect maximum throughput in some implementations. For example, if the automation is configured with more pickers, a maximum number of DUTs that can move through the test system per hour will be greater.
In some implementations, at least part of each picker is configured to operate in three degrees of freedom in concert with other pickers in a group of pickers or independently of the other pickers in the group. For example, at least part of each picker may be configured to move forward-backward (the Y dimension of
In some implementations, an individual picker or each picker in a group is configured to operate in four degrees of freedom independently of all other pickers. For example, at least part of a picker may be configured for independent movement as follows: forward-backward (the Y dimension of
The pickers are configured to move linearly along the gantry in the X dimension and to move along with the gantry in the Y-dimension as described previously, for example, with respect to
The Y-axis jog capability may accommodate mechanical tolerances in the test system Y-dimension positions of test sockets in packs and/or of rows of tray cells. For example, within a row of test sockets, individual devices and/or test sockets may be out of line—for example, off-center relative to other devices and/or test sockets in the row. For example, within a row of cells in a tray, individual devices and/or cells may be out of line—for example, off-center relative to other devices and/or cells in the row. The deviation in both cases may be measured in single-digit microns to single-digit millimeters, for example. The arms of pickers may be controlled to move in the Y-axis to account for such deviations. For example, the arms of the pickers may be controlled to move each nozzle to a center of its respective target socket or DUT to ensure that each picker places its DUT at the center of the target socket or picks-up the DUT at its center. The deviations may be detected by the vision system described herein and the pickers each may be controlled individually and independently by the control system described herein. In an example, the movement in the Y-dimension may be on the order of single-digit microns to single-digit millimeters; however, the Y-axis jog movement is not limited to this numerical range. To reiterate, the Y-axis jog movement of each picker is separate from Y-axis movement of the gantry beam and is relative to the gantry beam. Following DUT placement or pick-up, the Y-axis jog may be used to re-align the pickers during movement of the gantry beam.
As also described herein, individual pickers may be controlled to move along the gantry beam in the X-dimension to change the pitch between two or more adjacent pickers. In this regard, in some implementations, each picker may be mounted on an individual servo-controlled axis that enables the picker to dynamically adjust to—for example to match substantially—the center-to-center distance between test sockets and the center-to-center distance between tray cells. Examples of this dynamic adjustment are described with respect to
The picker nozzle is mounted on the picker arm, which extends and retracts in the Z-dimension—for example, vertically—as described herein. The picker nozzle is the contact point between the picker assembly and the DUT. Each nozzle may be configured to hold a DUT using vacuum pressure, for example. The nozzle may be a soft polymer vacuum cup comprised of ESD-dissipative material, a hard plastic tip comprised of ESD-dissipative material, a hard material comprising an integrated ejection collar to accommodate roll and pitch changes of a DUT, or a soft polymer vacuum cup comprising an integrated ejection collar configured to reduce stiction between the nozzle and the DUT. Other types of nozzles may be used. In some examples, mechanical ejection of DUT from the nozzle using an injection collar or other appropriate type of mechanical ejection mechanism may speed throughput and increase the accuracy at which DUTs are placed in the test sockets.
In some implementations, thermally induced expansion or contraction of the gantry beam and/or the test sockets affects positioning of the pickers. For example, the gantry beam may expand in the presence of excess heat or contract in the presence of cold, which can cause the positions of the pickers to change. In an example, the pitch of the pickers and/or the pitch of the test sockets may increase due to thermally induced expansion. In an example, the pitch of the pickers and/or the pitch of the test sockets may decrease due to thermally induced contraction. In this regard, in some implementations, one or more temperature sensors 105 may be attached to the gantry—for example, to gantry beam 21 of
In some implementations, one or more temperature sensors may mounted in each test socket as described herein. The temperatures sensors may be distributed in any appropriate manner and their values may be averaged or otherwise processed to obtain an estimated temperature of the sockets. The temperature sensors may detect the temperatures of the test sockets during operation of the test system and report the temperatures to the control system. The control system may execute processes to adjust the servo axes of the pickers in response to the thermally induced expansion or contraction of the sockets. For example, the control system may dynamically increase the pitch of the pickers to adjust for thermal expansion of the sockets causing a greater pitch between the sockets or dynamically decrease the pitch of the pickers to adjust for thermal contraction reducing pitch between the sockets.
In some implementations, multiple temperature sensors may indicate different amounts of expansion or contraction at different test sockets. In this case, the pitches of individual pickers may be adjusted accordingly to account for these different amounts of expansion or contraction. In some implementations, multiple temperature sensors may indicate different amounts of expansion or contraction at different points along the gantry beam. In this case, the pitches of individual pickers may be adjusted accordingly to counteract these different amounts of expansion or contraction. For example, in a group of pickers, the pitch between two pickers may be increased while the pitch between two other pickers may be decreased, depending upon circumstances.
In this regard, some or all components of the test system may expand and contract due to thermal effects. In some implementations, temperatures are measured at the test sites in the packs as described herein and also on the gantry as described above. The control system may be configured to execute instructions to obtain the temperature data from sensors at the test sites and at the gantry beam and to process those temperatures to determine the net thermal expansion and contraction of these two systems components. The control system may be configured to execute instructions to make the adjustments to the positions of the pickers to place DUTs into the test sockets or to pick-up DUTs from the test sockets in a manner that accounts for the relative thermal expansion or contraction of these and potentially other components of the test system. For example, the gantry beam may expand by a first amount and the sockets may expand by a second amount that is different from the first amount. The differences between the amounts of expansion may be used to calculate a net expansion. The control system may use the net expansion to adjust the pitches between pickers and, in some implementations, the magnitude of the Y-axis jog. Similar processes may be performed to account for a net contraction. In some cases, one component may expand and the other component may contract. A net difference may be determined by the controller based on the amounts of expansion and contraction and the resulting net difference may be used to adjust the positions of the pickers to account for the net difference. In some implementations, the amount of change in the adjusted pitches between pickers may vary. For example, in the case of six pickers, the first two adjacent pickers may have a first net change in pitch, the next two adjacent pickers may have a second net change in pitch, and the third two adjacent pickers may have a third net change in pitch. The first net change, the second net change, and the third net change may each be different. These different changes may be dictated by different amounts of thermal expansion at different locations.
In some implementations, temperature sensors may be included in the trays described herein and the control system may be configured to execute instructions to make the adjustments to the positions of the pickers to place DUTs into the trays or pick-up DUTs from the trays in a manner that accounts for relative thermal expansion and/or contraction of the gantry beam and the trays as described above.
The preceding adjustments to picker positions may be beneficial in example test system that use one or more down-pointing cameras (described below) to determine the positions of the test sites relative to the gantry automation including the gantry beam. Some such systems rely on one or more images captured by one or more down-pointing cameras to determine the positions of the test sites during initial system setup. These images may be captured before testing commences. In some implementations, one or more down-pointing laser scanner may be used in place of the one or more down-pointing cameras to determine the positions of the test sites during initial system setup. Because of the high throughput of the test system in some examples, a down-pointing camera may not capture an image every time a DUT is placed in a socket. In some examples, one or more up-pointing cameras capture images taken of every DUT to determine the position of that DUT relative to the picker. This may be done in real-time for each DUT on a picker, and this action may little time. During normal operation of the example test system, the control system uses data representing the last known position of a test socket captured by the down-pointing camera and stored in memory, and moves the gantry based on that last known position. If the temperature of the gantry and/or the temperature of test socket changes, then the last known position will be wrong. The temperature compensation described herein, along with the camera systems, may ensure, or at least increase the chances that, the picker will be accurately positioned for DUT placement operations and for DUT pick-up operations.
In some implementations, temperature compensation may include detecting temperatures of the test sockets as described herein. The temperature values may be processed—for example averaged—to obtain a value that is compared to a threshold. In some examples, the temperature values may be compared individually to one or more threshold values and it may be determined if a sufficient number of temperature values exceeds a threshold. In either case, if the threshold is exceeded or the number of temperature values exceeds the threshold, the down-pointing camera(s) or laser scanner(s) may be controlled to capture new image(s) of the test sockets that have been subjected to the thermal expansion. In the case of thermal contraction, the control system may determine if the processed temperature value is below a threshold or a number of individual temperatures is below the threshold. If so, then the down-pointing camera(s) or laser scanner(s) may be controlled to capture new image(s) of the test sockets that have been subjected to the thermal contraction. Testing may be interrupted to capture these new images or the new images may be captured during testing. These new images may be used to control the position and operation of the gantry beam and the pickers. In examples such as this, the dynamic adjustment of picker pitch described in the preceding paragraphs may not be performed at all. In some examples such as this, the dynamic adjustment of picker pitch described in the preceding paragraphs may be performed following new image capture.
As explained previously, the pickers are mounted on gantry. The gantry includes, among other things, the tracks, the gantry beam that holds the pickers, and one or more motors. The motors may be linear motors that are configured and controlled by the control system to move the gantry beam along the tracks as described with respect to
If the encoder scale is also shaking due to the vibrations of the frame induced by acceleration of the robotics, then the servo controller may not be able to decipher the difference between movements of the robotics and shaking of the frame. To address this problem, a force frame may be used in the test system. The force frame is a physical mechanism to separate the mounting of the encoder scale and the robotics' linear motors. The encoder scale is mounted to a segregated frame (the force frame) that does not contain motors or robotics. This force frame remains stable even if the frame that holds the motors vibrates. This mechanical mechanism may improve the settling time of the robot in that settling can be addressed by the servo motor even in cases where the frame holding the robotics' linear motors vibrates. The force frame may be segregated from the main Y-axis of a dual-motor gantry robot has the largest accelerations and vibrations and has the most impact on the settling time.
Implementations of the example test system described herein include a vision system. An example vision system may include cameras, LASER scanners, or a combination of cameras and LASER scanners of the type described below.
Referring to
Camera 107 is down-pointing, meaning that it is configured to capture images of surfaces and objects below it. Camera 107 is mounted near a group of pickers 111 including picker 101, which are also mounted on gantry beam 108. Camera 107 is configured and controllable to move linearly across the gantry beam along with the pickers. Although only one such camera is shown in the figures, the test system may include more than one such camera. For example, there may be one camera per picker. Camera 107 may have an adjustable height relative to the gantry beam. For example, a lens of camera 107 may be movable in the Z-dimension towards or away from the surface that the camera is imaging. Moving the lens or camera farther away from the surface increases its field of view, thereby allowing it to capture data over a larger area than when the lens or camera is moved closer to the surface. For example, based on the position of the camera and gantry beam, the camera may capture images of one or more empty test sockets not covered by their lids, one or more occupied test sockets not covered by their lids, or one or more occupied test sockets covered by their lids. For example, based on the position of the camera and the gantry beam, the camera may capture one or more cells in a tray that do, or do not, hold DUTs.
Image data from camera 107 may be 3D data representing a test socket and, in some cases, a test socket containing a DUT. The 3D contains data representing the X, Y, and Z dimensions. This data is sent by the camera to the control system wirelessly or over one or more system buses. The control system is configured—for example, programmed—to analyze the data received from camera 107. The data may be used to calibrate the camera and/or to position the pickers. For example, the data may identify a location of the test socket and/or a location of a device in the test socket such as when a lid is off the test socket. The control system may compare this information to expected locations of the test socket and/or the device, and adjust the locations of the pickers accordingly, either through movement along the gantry beam or using the Y-axis jog described previously. For example, the data may identify a location of the cell in a tray and/or a location of a device in the cell. The control system may compare this information to expected locations of the cell and/or the device, and adjust the locations of the pickers accordingly, either through movement along the gantry beam or using the Y-axis jog described previously. The adjustments may be performed in real-time. In this example, real-time may be during test operations. Real-time may include actions that occur on a continuous basis or track each other in time, taking into account delays associated with processing, data transmission, hardware, and the like.
In some implementations, the vision system includes a 3D LASER scanner that is down-pointing and that is configured—for example mounted, directed, and/or controlled—to scan across the array of test sockets in the test system in a manner similar to the LASER scanner described with respect to
This 3D data obtained by the laser scanner or camera may be sent to the control system in the manner described previously. The control system may be configured—for example, programmed—to process the 3D data to determine, for example, the roll and pitch of a single test socket plane as well as a test socket height (Z value). The control system may be configured to process the 3D data determine the roll and pitch of a plane containing some or all test sockets and the average height of test sockets in the plane. The control system may be configured to process the 3D data to determine the X, Y, and Z coordinates of, and yaw information for, an individual test socket by taking into account identifiable features of the test socket such as a 2D array of spring-loaded connector (e.g., Pogo pin) holes shown in the 3D data. The X, Y, Z coordinates and yaw information may be used by the control system to control the pickers. For example, the 3D data may identify a location of the test socket and/or a location of a device in the test socket when lid is off the test socket. The control system may use such information to control the positions of the pickers, either through movement along the gantry beam or using the Y-axis jog described previously. The control system may compare this information to expected locations of the test sockets and/or the devices, and adjust the locations of the pickers accordingly, either through movement along the gantry beam or using the Y-axis jog described previously. In some implementations, the pickers may be adjusted in this manner during or prior to testing operations.
In some implementations, the preceding 3D scanning may be performed during pick-and-place operations implemented during system operation. In this case, the 3D data from the one or more 3D scanners may be used as described herein to control operations of the pickers in real-time. In some implementations, the preceding 3D scanning may be performed prior to pick-and-place operations implemented during system operation. The information about test socket and device placement may be used instead of, or in addition to, the information captured by the 3D camera of
The test system may require placement of DUTs into test sockets and/or tray cells at a precision measured in single-digit microns, double-digit microns, triple-digit microns, or at any other appropriate precision. Placement at such precisions may require knowledge of how the DUT is being held by the picker prior to placement. To this end, the test system may include one or more (in this example, two) 3D LASER scanners 112, 113 mounted underneath pickers 111 and pointing upwards towards pickers 111, as shown in
The control system may use 3D data from both of the one or more up-pointing 3D LASER scanners 112, 113 and the one or more down-pointing 3D cameras of
Referring to
Cameras 120 may enable picture taking on-the-fly, for example, in real-time. For example, after picking a DUT and before placing the DUT into a test socket, the DUT's precise position and orientation in the picker may be determined. In order to improve or to maximize throughput, after the DUT has been picked from a tray, the gantry beam may move at full speed towards the up-pointing cameras 120 but slow down as the gantry approaches the up-pointing cameras. The DUT picker will then move at a reduced speed and, in some implementations a constant speed, above the up-pointing cameras 120. Light from strobe lights 121 captures a freeze-frame of the underside of the DUTs held by the pickers and the control system processes data representing those images to calculate the desired information.
As noted, strobe lights 121 are arranged and controlled to flash light while pickers holding DUTs are moving at a velocity that is constant or substantially constant—for example, less than 1%, 5%, or 10% deviation from a prescribed velocity. The number of pickers in the test system may be based on a desired maximum throughput. Similarly, the up-pointing cameras may vary in number. In some implementations, there may be a single up-pointing camera. In some implementations, there may be the same number of up-pointing cameras as the number of pickers, as shown in
All or some of the cameras in the vision system may be positioned on independent servo axes to expand their depths of field. For example, each camera or its lens may be positioned on an independent servo axis and controlled independently to move towards or away from its target for image capture—in the examples described herein, that is in the Z-dimension. In this regard, in some implementations, camera and lens combination used in the test system may have a shallow depth of field. The height of the camera's target can change based on DUT thickness and general variations of a plane containing the test sockets. In order to bring the target into focus, each camera may be mounted on a motorized axis that is controllable through servo control to position the camera's lens relative to its target. This type of control also enables the system to support DUTs having different heights or thicknesses.
Referring to
As indicated above, the LASER range finder makes its determination before a lid is placed over the DUT in the test socket. Furthermore, as noted, operations performed by the LASER range finder may occur in parallel with—for example, concurrently with or at the same time as—the gantry moves the pickers to a next set of test sockets. Operation in this manner may result in negligible or no effect on throughput.
Referring to
Referring to
The test system may include a permanently mounted LASER cleaner system on an auxiliary gantry. For example, as shown in
As described previously such as with respect to
In an example configuration, the test system includes actuator 167 having an upper arm 168 configured to move vertically in the Z-dimension towards and away from socket 165. The actuator is configured to move a lid onto the test socket and to move the lid off the socket so that the pickers have clear access to the DUT and test socket. A lid assembly or simply “lid” is configured for the specific socket application in terms of DUT size and thickness, whether the DUT is configured for top testing, and any DUT-specific heating or cooling requirements An attachment mechanism, which may be considered part of or separate from the lid, includes a stop plate that abuts the socket frame when the lid is full engaged with the test socket to establish a precision Z-dimension (or vertical) reference. The lid includes springs that are compressible to provide precise forces to the device in the socket even if there is fluctuation in force applied by the actuator. The lid includes a cap that contacts the device. This cap is aligned to the socket via alignment pins that also align to thermal control components in the lid. The thermal components are described in more detail below and may include passive heat sinks or active components such as a liquid cooled plate, a thermoelectric cooler (TEC), and/or electric heating elements. The test socket may also include temperature one or more sensors to monitor the temperature of the components. The test socket may also include one or more temperature sensors to monitor the temperature of the test socket or the test site containing the test socket.
The upper arm holds the socket lid. The dimensions of this upper arm can be configured based on the dimensions of a specific device to test—e.g., an application board—to provide appropriate reach. Between the upper arm and the lid is an attachment mechanism 175 that allows the lid to float, ensuring compliance between the lid and arm and accurate alignment between the lid and test socket. This attachment mechanism may include springs and centering features so as to return the lid assembly to a center of its floating range. The upper arm also contains features to support any cables or wires required for thermal control components or other test features such as radio frequency (RF) probing to a top of a device. The lower arm is configured to attach the assembly to another structure, here the customer test site board containing the test socket 165. The lower arm also supports an end-user test site board and a support spider that connects the board to the arm.
As shown in
Attachment mechanism 175 (
As explained previously, actuator 167 is configured and controllable by the control system to force the lid into the test socket. That is, after the lid is over the device in the test socket and has settled in place, the actuator applies downward force in the Z-dimension in the direction of arrow 184 (
Attachment mechanism 175 includes stop plate 196 configured to abut the test socket frame 220 when the lid is full engaged with the test socket to establish a vertical (or Z-dimension) height reference. The stop plate may be a structure having at least one flat surface in some implementations. When full force is applied to lid 166, as shown in
In
To remove lid 166 from the test socket, actuator 167 moves in the direction of arrow 217, taking lid 166 with it. Actuator 167 may then rotate upper arm 168 to expose test socket 165 to allow the pickers to access a DUT that has been tested.
Referring to
In some implementations, the control system controls the liquid coolant to keep it at a temperature that is above a dew point temperature of an environment containing the test system. The dew point is a temperature at which air must be cooled to saturate with water vapor. Saturation exists when the air is holding a maximum amount of water vapor possible at a given temperature and pressure. When the temperature is below the dew point, the water vapor in the air is released as liquid water, namely condensation. Keeping the liquid coolant above the dew point temperature may prevent condensation on the coolant transmission conduits, on the lid, and elsewhere in the test system. Example dew points for environmental temperatures include, but are not limited to, indoor air maintained at 20-24.5° C. (68-76° F.) with a 20-60% relative humidity, equivalent to a dew point of 4.0 to 15.5° C. (39 to 60° F.).
In this regard, an enclosure, such as enclosure 230, creates a thermally-insulated and a hermetically-sealed micro-environment around its respective test socket. The dew point temperature within that micro-environment may be managed, for example, by applying vacuum pressure to the enclosure as described in more detail below. In this regard, decreasing the atmospheric pressure within enclosure 230 may decrease the dew point temperature in the micro-environment. In some examples, dry air may be introduced into the enclosure as described in more detail below in order to control the dew point within the micro-environment. The rate of flow of, and/or the type of, the liquid coolant may therefore be controlled—for example, changed or varied—to produce low temperatures in the micro-environment, such as temperatures at or below 0° C. (32° F.), while keeping those temperatures above the lowered dew point temperature of the micro-environment. The combination of managing the dew point temperature in the micro-environment and controlling the type and/or flow rate of the liquid coolant to keep the temperatures produced thereby above the managed dew point temperature enables low-temperature cooling of the DUT in the test socket while reducing or preventing condensation on or around the DUT, on or around the test socket, or on or around other components and/or electronics included within the enclosure. In this regard, in some implementations, the thermal control system is configured to control a temperature of a DUT in a test socket in a range from below 0° C. (32° F.) to over 150° C. (302° F.). Other implementations may perform temperature control over different ranges.
Enclosure 230 may be made of metal, composite, or plastic. Enclosure 230 may thermally insulate a DUT in test socket 165 from all or some other DUTs and/or test sockets in the test system. This insulation, combined with the thermal control system described with respect to
Actuator 167 also may hold an enclosure lid 234 that fits over and thermally and physically seals hole 230 when the test socket lid is placed over the test socket. In some implementations (not shown in the figures), the bottom half of the enclosure is around the test socket and the upper arm holds the top half of the enclosure and places it over the bottom half while placing the lid over the test socket. The bottom half of the enclosure may include the socket frame with a fitting to connect to purge air or vacuum. The top half of the enclosure may be attached to the cold plate and swing into place with the upper arm. The TEC, the cap, and DUT will be in the enclosure.
In some implementations, enclosure 230 and enclosure lid 234 hermetically seal the test socket and DUT contained therein. For example, the enclosure and lid may physically isolate the test socket and DUT from all or some other test sockets and DUTs in the test system and may create an air-tight region around the test socket and DUT. This isolation and thermal insulation can prevent contaminants from infecting the testing operations and enable precise temperature control. A fitting 236 may be included on enclosure 230. The fitting may include a port to allow access to the enclosure's interior. For example, vacuum pressure or a gas purge may be applied to the port. A vacuum pressure, or vacuum, may include a pressure that is less than local atmospheric pressure and that may be defined as a difference between the local atmospheric pressure and a point at which the pressure is measured. The vacuum may suction air or contaminants from the hermetically-sealed enclosure and may be used to change the dew point within the enclosure, as described previously. A gas purge may include introducing dry air or nitrogen gas into the enclosure either before, after, or during testing. In some implementations, the test system may include one or more supplies of ionized gas, such as ionized air, that may be introduced into the enclosure to reduce to minimize ESD events, as described previously. In some implementations, one or more fans may be configured and arranged move ionized air from the ionized air supply over all or some of the test sockets while the pick-and-place robots are moving devices into and out of the test sockets and during testing. The ionized air may therefore also enter the enclosures while the test sockets are exposed during system operation.
Referring to
Referring to
In
In this example, cold plate 190 has structure that is at least partly flat, hence use of the term “plate”. However, cold plate 190 may have any appropriate structure, including cubical structures or polyhedral structures. The cold plate may be reduced in temperature using liquid coolant conduits that run to, through, and/or over the cold plate. Examples of liquid coolant that may be used include, but are not limited to, chilled water, an ethylene glycol and water mixture, hydrofluoroether (HFE), and silicone oil. One or more conduits 254 are configured to transport the liquid coolant between cold plate 190 and a supply 255 of the liquid coolant. The supply may be within the housing of the test system or external to the test system. The liquid coolant thus circulates between the cold plate and its supply. A liquid/liquid/heat exchanger 257 may be arranged in the circulation path of the liquid coolant, for example at the supply, to maintain the liquid coolant at a target temperature using chilled water. A pressure regulator 259 in conjunction with an expansion tank 260 may be configured to maintain the pressure of the liquid coolant in the conduits. In some examples, the control system described herein may control the flow of liquid coolant shown in
The flow of liquid coolant to each test site is independently and asynchronously controllable to affect—for example, to reduce—a temperature of a DUT in each test site. The control system described herein may control the flow of liquid coolant to the test site based, for example, on active feedback from temperature sensors at the test site. The temperature sensors may include a first temperature sensor at, on, or near the cap 192 to detect a temperature proximate to the DUT and a second temperature sensor at, on, or near the cap but farther away from the DUT than the first temperature sensor. Additional or fewer temperature sensors may be used, which may be distributed across various locations on the lid. In this example, the two temperature sensors send temperature data to the control system. The control system is configured to control the temperature of the DUT based on the sensed temperatures based on the requirements of one or more test programs being run to test the DUT.
As shown in
The thermal control system may also include one or more—for example two—heaters 264 embedded in, or placed on, the cold plate. The heaters are adjustable by the control system to increase a temperature of the cold plate and, through conduction via the TEC and the cap, to increase the temperature of the DUT during testing. The heaters may be arranged at locations on the cold plate that ensure equal or substantially equal distribution of heat over the cold plate. This temperature increase may be a requirement of a test program, for example. During a heating cycle, the flow of liquid coolant to the cold plate may stop or may be reduced so as not to counteract the heating produced by the heaters. The system may control the heaters to heat the cold plate at a rate that is greater than or equal to a predefined rate required for testing. During cooling using the liquid coolant, the heaters may be turned off or turned down so as not to counteract the cooling produced by the liquid coolant.
In operation, the temperature of a DUT in a test socket is controlled by changing a temperature of cold plate 190 that is thermally conductive. This is done by controlling an amount of liquid coolant that flows through the cold plate and/or controlling a temperature of the cold plate by controlling operation of one or more heaters in contact with the plate. The TEC is controlled to transfer heat between the plate and the DUT to control the temperature of the DUT. Following heated testing, the heaters may be turned-off and the liquid coolant may be controlled to flow through the structure to cool the structure down to a handling temperature, such as 68° F. (20° C.).
In some implementations of the test system described herein, the automated gantry may include more than one gantry beam that moves relative to a horizontal plane of test sites. For example, as shown in
In example implementations, the test system is 1.6 meters (m) in width by 8 m in length. However, the test system is not limited to these dimensions and may be any appropriate size. The test system may scale to accommodate a user's needs.
In some implementations, individual packs may operate as stand-alone testers. For example, test sockets of a pack may be manually loaded with DUTs. The pack may then perform one or more test routines on the DUT using the test electronics contained on the packs. In this configuration, a stand-alone pack may, or may not, communicate with a remote computing or control system to direct testing, to control testing, and/or to report test results. Upon completion of testing, the DUTs may be manually removed from the test socket and the process may be repeated.
The example test systems described herein may be implemented by, and/or controlled using, one or more computer systems comprising hardware or a combination of hardware and software. For example, a system like the ones described herein may include various controllers and/or processing devices located at various points in the system to control operation of the automated elements. A central computer may coordinate operation among the various controllers or processing devices. The central computer, controllers, and processing devices may execute various software routines to effect control and coordination of the various automated elements.
The example systems described herein can be controlled, at least in part, using one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more computer program tangibly embodied in one or more information carriers, such as one or more non-transitory machine-readable media, for execution by, or to control the operation of, one or more data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, multiple computers, and/or programmable logic components.
A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing all or part of the testing can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions described herein. All or part of the testing can be implemented using special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
Any “electrical connection” as used herein may include a direct physical connection or a wired or wireless connection that includes or does not include intervening components but that nevertheless allows electrical signals to flow between connected components. Any “connection” involving electrical circuitry that allows signals to flow, unless stated otherwise, includes an electrical connection and is not necessarily a direct physical connection regardless of whether the word “electrical” is used to modify “connection”.
Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 557186 | Cahill | Mar 1896 | A |
| 2224407 | Passur | Dec 1940 | A |
| 2380026 | Clarke | Jul 1945 | A |
| 2631775 | Gordon | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2635524 | Jenkins | Apr 1953 | A |
| 3120166 | Lyman | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3360032 | Sherwood | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3364838 | Bradley | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3517601 | Germain | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3845286 | Zeiss et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4147299 | Freeman | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4233644 | Hwang et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4336748 | Martin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4379259 | Varadi et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4477127 | Kume | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4495545 | Dufresne et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4526318 | Fleming et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4620248 | Gitzendanner | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4648007 | Garner | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4654727 | Blum et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4654732 | Mesher | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4665455 | Mesher | May 1987 | A |
| 4683424 | Cutright et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685303 | Branc et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4688124 | Scribner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4700293 | Grone | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4713714 | Gatti et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4739444 | Zushi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4754397 | Varaiya et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4768285 | Woodman, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4775281 | Prentakis | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778063 | Ueberreiter | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4801234 | Cedrone | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4809881 | Becker | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817273 | Lape et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4817934 | McCormick et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4851965 | Gabuzda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4878137 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4881591 | Rignall | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4888549 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4911281 | Jenkner | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4967155 | Magnuson | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5012187 | Littlebury | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5045960 | Eding | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5061630 | Knopf et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5094584 | Bullock | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5119270 | Bolton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122914 | Hanson | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5127684 | Klotz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5128813 | Lee | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5136395 | Ishii et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143193 | Geraci | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5158132 | Guillemot | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5168424 | Bolton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171183 | Pollard et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173819 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176202 | Richard | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5205132 | Fu | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206772 | Hirano et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207613 | Ferchau et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5210680 | Scheibler | May 1993 | A |
| 5237484 | Ferchau et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5263537 | Plucinski et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268637 | Liken | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5269698 | Singer | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5295392 | Hensel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5309323 | Gray et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5325263 | Singer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5343403 | Beidle et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5349486 | Sugimoto et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5368072 | Cote | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374395 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379229 | Parsons et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5398058 | Hattori | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5412531 | Clapp, III | May 1995 | A |
| 5412534 | Cutts et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5414591 | Kimura et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5426581 | Kishi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5434737 | Okimi | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5469037 | McMurtrey, Sr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5477416 | Schkrohowsky et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484012 | Hiratsuka | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486681 | Dagnac et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5491610 | Mok et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5543727 | Bushard et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5546250 | Diel | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5557186 | McMurtrey, Sr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5563768 | Perdue | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570740 | Flores et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5593380 | Bittikofer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601141 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604662 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5610893 | Soga et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617430 | Angelotti et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5644705 | Stanley | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646918 | Dimitri et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5654846 | Wicks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5673029 | Behl et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5694290 | Chang | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703843 | Katsuyama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5718627 | Wicks | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5718628 | Nakazato et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719985 | Norikazu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731928 | Jabbari et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751549 | Eberhardt et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754365 | Beck et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761032 | Jones | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5785482 | Nobuhiro | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793610 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811678 | Hirano | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812761 | Seki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813817 | Matsumiya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819842 | Potter et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5831525 | Harvey | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851143 | Hamid | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859409 | Kim et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5859540 | Fukumoto | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862037 | Behl | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5870630 | Reasoner et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5886639 | Behl et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890959 | Pettit et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892367 | Magee et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894218 | Farnworth et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5912799 | Grouell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913926 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914856 | Morton et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5927386 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5955877 | Farnworth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956301 | Dimitri et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959834 | Chang | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5999356 | Dimitri et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 5999365 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6000623 | Blatti et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005404 | Cochran et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005770 | Schmitt | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008636 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008984 | Cunningham et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011689 | Wrycraft | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6031717 | Baddour et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034870 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042348 | Aakalu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045113 | Itakura | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055814 | Song | May 2000 | A |
| 6066822 | Nemoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067225 | Reznikov et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069792 | Nelik | May 2000 | A |
| 6084768 | Bolognia | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094342 | Dague et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6104607 | Behl | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107813 | Sinsheimer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115250 | Schmitt | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122131 | Jeppson | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122232 | Schell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124707 | Kim et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129428 | Helwig et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130817 | Flotho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144553 | Hileman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6166901 | Gamble et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169413 | Paek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6169930 | Blachek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177805 | Pih | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178835 | Orriss et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181557 | Gatti | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185065 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6185097 | Behl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188191 | Frees et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192282 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193339 | Behl et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6209842 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6227516 | Webster, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6229275 | Yamamoto | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231145 | Liu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233148 | Shen | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236563 | Buican et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6247944 | Bolognia et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249824 | Henrichs | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252769 | Tullstedt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6262581 | Han | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262863 | Ostwald et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272007 | Kitlas et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6272767 | Botruff et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281677 | Cosci et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282501 | Assouad | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285524 | Boigenzahn et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289678 | Pandolfi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6297950 | Erwin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298672 | Valicoff, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301105 | Glorioso et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
| 6302714 | Bolognia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304839 | Ho et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307386 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6327150 | Levy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330154 | Fryers et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6351379 | Cheng | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6354792 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356409 | Price et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356415 | Kabasawa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6384593 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6384995 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388437 | Wolski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388875 | Chen | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388878 | Chang | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389225 | Malinoski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390756 | Isaacs et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6411584 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6421236 | Montoya et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434000 | Pandolfi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434498 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434499 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459572 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464080 | Morris et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467153 | Butts et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6473297 | Behl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473301 | Levy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476627 | Pelissier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6477044 | Foley et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6477442 | Valerino, Sr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480380 | French et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480382 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6487071 | Tata et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6489793 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6494663 | Ostwald et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6515470 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6525933 | Eland | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6526841 | Wanek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535384 | Huang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6537013 | Emberty et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6544309 | Hoefer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546445 | Hayes | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553279 | Brown | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553532 | Aoki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560107 | Beck et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565163 | Behl et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6566859 | Wolski et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6567266 | Ives et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6568770 | Gonska et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6570734 | Ostwald et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6577586 | Yang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6577687 | Hall et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6618246 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6618254 | Ives | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6618548 | Shuji et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626846 | Spencer | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6628518 | Behl et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6635115 | Fairbairn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6640235 | Anderson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6644982 | Ondricek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6651192 | Viglione et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654240 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6679128 | Wanek et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6693757 | Hayakawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6701003 | Feinstein | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6736583 | Ostwald et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741529 | Getreuer | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6746648 | Mattila et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751093 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6791785 | Messenger et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6791799 | Fletcher | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798651 | Syring et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798972 | Ito et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801834 | Konshak et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6806700 | Wanek et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808353 | Ostwald et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6811427 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822412 | Gan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6822858 | Allgeyer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826046 | Muncaster et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6830372 | Liu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6832929 | Garrett et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6838051 | Marquiss et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6854174 | Jiang | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6861861 | Song et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6862173 | Konshak et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6867939 | Katahara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6882141 | Kim | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6892328 | Klein et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6904479 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6908330 | Garrett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6928336 | Peshkin et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937432 | Sri-Jayantha et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6957291 | Moon et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960908 | Chung et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6965811 | Dickey et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974017 | Oseguera | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6976190 | Goldstone | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6980381 | Gray et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982872 | Behl et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7002363 | Mathieu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006325 | Emberty et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7013198 | Haas | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7021883 | Plutt et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039924 | Goodman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047106 | Butka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054150 | Orriss et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7070323 | Wanek et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076391 | Pakzad et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7077614 | Hasper et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7084655 | Min et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7088541 | Orriss et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7092251 | Henry | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7106582 | Albrecht et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7123477 | Coglitore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126777 | Flechsig et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130138 | Lum et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7134553 | Stephens | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7139145 | Archibald et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7142419 | Cochrane | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7164579 | Muncaster et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7167360 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7181458 | Higashi | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7203021 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7203060 | Kay et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206201 | Behl et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7216968 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219028 | Bae et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219273 | Fisher et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227746 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7232101 | Wanek et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243043 | Shin | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248467 | Sri-Jayantha et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249992 | Kalenian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7251544 | Christie, Jr. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257747 | Song | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7259966 | Connelly, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7273344 | Ostwald et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7280352 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7280353 | Wendel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289885 | Basham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7304855 | Milligan et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7315447 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7333283 | Akamatsu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7349205 | Hall et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353524 | Lin et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7362961 | Shigeru et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7375960 | Blaalid et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7385385 | Magliocco et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7387485 | Dickey et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7390458 | Burow et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7391609 | Wendel et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7395133 | Lowe | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403451 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7408338 | Ham et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7416332 | Rountree et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421623 | Haugh | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7437212 | Farchmin et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7447011 | Wade et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7457112 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7467024 | Flitsch | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476362 | Angros | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480807 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7483269 | Marvin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7505264 | Hall et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7554811 | Scicluna et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7568122 | Mechalke et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7570455 | Deguchi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7573715 | Mojaver et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7584016 | Weaver | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7584851 | Hong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7612996 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7625027 | Kiaie et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7630196 | Hall et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635246 | Neeper et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643289 | Ye et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7646596 | Ng | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7710684 | Hashimoto | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729107 | Atkins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7729112 | Atkins | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7737715 | Tilbor et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7777985 | Barkley | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7778031 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7789267 | Hutchinson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7796724 | Ito | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7848106 | Merrow | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7852723 | Onagi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7890207 | Toscano et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7904211 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908029 | Slocum, III | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7911778 | Merrow | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920380 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7929303 | Merrow | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7932734 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7936534 | Orriss et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7940529 | Merrow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945424 | Garcia et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7987018 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7995349 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7996174 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8041449 | Noble et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046187 | Klein et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8061155 | Farquhar et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8086343 | Slocum, III | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8095234 | Polyakov et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8102173 | Merrow | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8116079 | Merrow | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8117480 | Merrow et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8140182 | Noble et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8160739 | Toscano et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8167521 | Nakao et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8238099 | Merrow | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8279603 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8305751 | Merrow | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8318512 | Shah et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8339445 | Yoro et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8405971 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8466699 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467180 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8482915 | Merrow | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8485511 | Di Stefano | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8499611 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8504194 | Mitsuyoshi | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8547123 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8549912 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8628239 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8631698 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8655482 | Merrow | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8687349 | Truebenbach | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8687356 | Merrow | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8755177 | Farquhar et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8770204 | Bencivenni et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8886946 | Fraser et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 8926196 | Detofsky et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8941726 | Marks et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8964361 | Truebenbach | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8967605 | Kogure | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8970244 | Di Stefano et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9001456 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9002186 | Akers et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9196518 | Hofmeister et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9201093 | Lee | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9459312 | Arena et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9463574 | Purkayastha et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9483040 | Kazumasa | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9580245 | Mansfield et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9606145 | Peng et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9779780 | Martino | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9789605 | Meier et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 10359779 | Duda et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10466273 | Hwang et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
| 10675487 | Zwart et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10725091 | Bowyer et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10845410 | Bowyer et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 11002787 | Wolff et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11754596 | McKenna et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
| 11754622 | Akers et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
| 20010006453 | Glorioso et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044023 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010046118 | Yamanashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048590 | Behl et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020009391 | Marquiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026258 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030981 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020044416 | Harmon et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051338 | Jiang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071248 | Huang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079422 | Jiang | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090320 | Burow et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116087 | Brown | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161971 | Dimitri et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172004 | Ives et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030035271 | Lelong et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043550 | Ives | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121337 | Wanek et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206397 | Allgeyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040051544 | Malathong et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165489 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207387 | Chung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208354 | Vilella | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230399 | Shin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236465 | Butka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251866 | Gan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264121 | Orriss et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004703 | Christie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010836 | Bae et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012498 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050018397 | Kav et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055601 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050057849 | Twogood et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050062463 | Kim | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069400 | Dickey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109131 | Wanek et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116702 | Wanek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131578 | Weaver | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050164530 | Yates et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179457 | Min et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207059 | Cochrane | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216811 | Song | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219809 | Muncaster et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225338 | Sands et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270737 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010353 | Haugh | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023331 | Flechsia et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028802 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035563 | Kalenian et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066974 | Akamatsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130316 | Takase et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190205 | Klein et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208757 | Bjork | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060227517 | Zayas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250766 | Blaalid et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018673 | Hsieh | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070034368 | Atkins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035874 | Wendel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035875 | Hall et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070040570 | Gopal et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053154 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070082907 | Canada et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127202 | Scicluna et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127206 | Wade et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144542 | Bencivenni et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152655 | Ham et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183871 | Hofmeister et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185676 | Ding et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195497 | Atkins | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248142 | Rountree et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253157 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286045 | Onagi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296408 | Liao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296426 | Krishnaswami et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080002538 | Raaymakers | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080007865 | Orriss et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030945 | Mojaver et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112075 | Farquhar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191725 | Cojocneanu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080238460 | Kress et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080239564 | Farquhar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282275 | Zaczek et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282278 | Barkley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297140 | An | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317575 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090028669 | Rebstock | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082907 | Stuvel et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090122443 | Farquhar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142169 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090153992 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090153993 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090153994 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175705 | Nakao et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261047 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261228 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261229 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262444 | Polyakov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262445 | Noble et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262454 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262455 | Merrow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265032 | Toscano et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265043 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265136 | Garcia et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090297328 | Slocum, III | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100074404 | Ito | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083732 | Merrow et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100165498 | Merrow et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100165501 | Polyakov et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168906 | Toscano et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172722 | Noble et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100193661 | Merrow | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194253 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100195236 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220183 | Yoro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100230885 | Di Stefano | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249993 | Mitsuyoshi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265609 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265610 | Merrow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279439 | Shah et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100283476 | Shen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100302678 | Merrow | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110011844 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110012631 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110012632 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110013362 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110013665 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110013666 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110013667 | Merrow et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110064546 | Merrow | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074458 | Di Stefano et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148020 | Kogure | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110157825 | Merrow et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172807 | Merrow | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185811 | Merrow et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189934 | Merrow | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110236163 | Smith et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261483 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305132 | Merrow et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310724 | Martino | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120023370 | Truebenbach | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120034054 | Polyakov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120050903 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106351 | Gohel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321435 | Truebenbach | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130071224 | Merrow et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108253 | Akers et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130181576 | Shiozawa et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200915 | Panagas | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130256967 | Carvalho | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130340445 | Yosef et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345836 | Ikushima | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140002123 | Lee | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140093214 | Detofsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140160270 | Naito et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140260333 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140271064 | Merrow et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140306728 | Arena et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150127986 | Tahara | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160041202 | Peng et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20170059635 | Orchanian et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170277185 | Duda et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170285102 | Ding | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180294244 | Onozawa et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180313890 | Wolff | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180314249 | Appu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190064252 | Bowyer et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190064254 | Bowyer et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190064261 | Bowyer et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190064305 | Khalid | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190277907 | Wolff et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20200025823 | Teich et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200319231 | Adams et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 583716 | May 1989 | AU |
| 1177187 | Mar 1998 | CN |
| 1192544 | Sep 1998 | CN |
| 2341188 | Sep 1999 | CN |
| 1114109 | Jul 2003 | CN |
| 3786944 | Nov 1993 | DE |
| 69111634 | May 1996 | DE |
| 69400145 | Oct 1996 | DE |
| 19701548 | Aug 1997 | DE |
| 19804813 | Sep 1998 | DE |
| 69614460 | Jun 2002 | DE |
| 69626584 | Dec 2003 | DE |
| 19861388 | Aug 2007 | DE |
| 0242970 | Feb 1987 | EP |
| 0277634 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0210497 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 0356977 | Oct 1990 | EP |
| 0442642 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 0466073 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0523633 | Jan 1993 | EP |
| 0582017 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0617570 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0635836 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0657887 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0757351 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 0776009 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 0757320 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 0741508 | Oct 1998 | EP |
| 1045301 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 0840476 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1209557 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1234308 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1422713 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1612798 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 1760722 | Mar 2007 | EP |
| 2241118 | Aug 1991 | GB |
| 2276275 | Sep 1994 | GB |
| 2299436 | Oct 1996 | GB |
| 2312984 | Nov 1997 | GB |
| 2328782 | Mar 1999 | GB |
| 2347597 | Sep 2000 | GB |
| 2439844 | Jan 2008 | GB |
| 61115279 | Jun 1986 | JP |
| 62177621 | Aug 1987 | JP |
| 62239394 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62251915 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 63002160 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 63004483 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 63016482 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 63062057 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| 63201946 | Aug 1988 | JP |
| 63214972 | Sep 1988 | JP |
| 63269376 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| S63195697 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 64-089034 | Apr 1989 | JP |
| 2091565 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| 2098197 | Apr 1990 | JP |
| 2185784 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| 2199690 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 2278375 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 3008066 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| H03-8086 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| 3078160 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| 3105704 | May 1991 | JP |
| 3207947 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 3210662 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 3212859 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 3214490 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 3240821 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| 3295071 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4017134 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| 4143989 | May 1992 | JP |
| 4172658 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 4214288 | Aug 1992 | JP |
| 4247385 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 4259956 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 4307440 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 4325923 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 5035053 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 5035415 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 5066896 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5068257 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5073566 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5073803 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5101603 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 5173718 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| 5189163 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| 5204725 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 5223551 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| H05319520 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 6004220 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 6004981 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| H6162645 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| H6181561 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| H6215515 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| H6274943 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 6314173 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 7007321 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 7029364 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| H07010212 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 7037376 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 7056654 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 7111078 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| 7115497 | May 1995 | JP |
| 7201082 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 7226023 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| H07-230669 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 1982246 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 7257525 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 7307059 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| H087994 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 8030398 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 8030407 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 8079672 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| H08106776 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| H08110821 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| H08167231 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| H08212015 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| H08244313 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| H08263525 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| H08263909 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 2553315 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| H08297957 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 0944445 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| 09082081 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| H09064571 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 2635127 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| H09306094 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| H09319466 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 10040021 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 10049365 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 10064173 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 10098521 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2771297 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 10275137 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 10281799 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 10320128 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 10340139 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 2862679 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11134852 | May 1999 | JP |
| 11139839 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2906930 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 11203201 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 11213182 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 11327800 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 11353128 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 11353129 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2000-56935 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000056935 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000066845 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2000112831 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000113563 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000114759 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000125290 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000132704 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2000149431 | May 2000 | JP |
| 3052183 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000228686 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000236188 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000242598 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 3097994 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2000278647 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2000305860 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2297770 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001005501 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001023270 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001100925 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2002042446 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2007087498 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| 2007188615 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2007220184 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007293936 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007305206 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007305290 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007328761 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008503824 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2000235762 | Feb 2021 | JP |
| 19980035445 | Aug 1998 | KR |
| 0176527 | Apr 1999 | KR |
| 10-0214308 | Aug 1999 | KR |
| 10-0403039 | Dec 2003 | KR |
| 10-2004-0053235 | Jun 2004 | KR |
| 10-0639436 | Oct 2006 | KR |
| 10-2007-0024354 | Mar 2007 | KR |
| 1020070024354 | Mar 2007 | KR |
| 1020130093262 | Aug 2013 | KR |
| 10-2013-0111915 | Oct 2013 | KR |
| 10-1420185 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 101420185 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 10-2017-0095655 | Aug 2017 | KR |
| 20170095655 | Aug 2017 | KR |
| 20-0486462 | May 2018 | KR |
| 200486462 | May 2018 | KR |
| 10-2019-0106616 | Sep 2019 | KR |
| 1020190106616 | Sep 2019 | KR |
| 45223 | Jan 1998 | SG |
| 387574 | Apr 2000 | TW |
| 198901682 | Feb 1989 | WO |
| 1997006532 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 0049487 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0067253 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0109627 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0141148 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 03013783 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| 03021597 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 03021598 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 03067385 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 2004006260 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004114286 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005024830 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005024831 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005083749 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005109131 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006030185 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006048611 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006100441 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2006100445 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2007031729 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2019217057 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Action and Response History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,048, 183 pages. |
| Action and Response History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,073, 48 pages. |
| Action and Response History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,112, 251 pages. |
| Action and Response History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,104, 206 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2019/038909, 10 pages (dated Mar. 4, 2021). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/046725, 9 pages (dated Jan. 28, 2019). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/046734, 8 pages (dated Mar. 13, 2020). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/046734, 11 pages (dated Dec. 11, 2018). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/046740, 8 pages (dated Dec. 5, 2018). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2021/055895, dated Feb. 4, 2022, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/055899 , 10 pages (dated Feb. 11, 2022). |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/055901, 9 pages (dated Feb. 9, 2022). |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/055903, 8 pages (dated Feb. 15, 2022). |
| Henderson, “HAD High Aerial Densities Require Solid Test Fixtures”, Flexstar Technology, 3 pages (Feb. 26, 2007). |
| International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/055898, dated Feb. 11, 2022, (4 pages). |
| Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/055898, dated Feb. 11, 2022, (5 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2021/055898 dated May 4, 2023, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2021/055895 dated May 4, 2023, 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2021/055903 dated May 4, 2023, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2021/055899 dated May 4, 2023, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2021/055901 dated May 4, 2023, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,048 (50 pages) dated Jun. 12, 2020. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,112 (66 pages) dated Mar. 5, 2020. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,073; response thereto; and application as filed. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,048; response thereto; and application as filed. |
| Park, “Vibration and Noise Reduction of an Optical Disk Drive by Using a Vibration Absorber Methods and Apparatus for Securing Disk Drives in a Disk”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. vol. 48. Nov. 2002. |
| Prater et al., “Thermal and Heat-Flow Aspects of Actuators for Hard Disk Drives”, InterSociety Conference on Thermal Phenomena, paaes 261-268 1994. |
| Ruwart et al., “Performance Impact of External Vibration on Consumer-grade and enterprise-class Disk Drives”, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE/13th Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technoloaies 2005. |
| Schroeder et al., “Disk Failures in the Real World: What does an MTTP of 1,000,000 hours mean to you?”, In FAST'07: 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, San Jose, CA, Feb. 14-16, 2007. |
| Schulze et al., “How Reliable Is a Raid?,” COMPCON Spring apos; 89, Thirty-Fourth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage, Digest of papers; pp. 118-123. Feb. 27-Mar. 3, 1989. |
| Seagate Product Marketing, “Seagate's Advanced Multidrive System (SAMS) Rotational Vibration Feature”, Publication TP-229D, Feb. 2000. |
| Suwa et al., “Evaluation System for Residual Vibration from HDD Mounting Mechanism” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35. No. 2, pp. 868-873. Mar. 1999. |
| Suwa et al., “Rotational Vibration Suppressor” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin Oct. 1991. |
| Terwiesch et al., “An Exploratory Study of International Product Transfer and Production Ramp-Up in the Data Storage Industry”, The Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, pp. 1-31, 1999. www-iros.ucsd.edu/sloan/. |
| Tzeng, “Dynamic Torque Characteristics of Disk-Drive Spindle Bearings”, ISPS—vol. 1, Advances In Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 57-63, ASME 1995. |
| Tzeng, “Measurements of Transient Thermal Strains in a Disk-Drive Actuator”, InterSociety conference on Thermal Phenomena, pp. 269-274, 1994. |
| Wilson—7000 disk Drive Analyzer Product Literature, date accessed Jan. 28, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Winchester, “Automation Specialists Use Machine Vision as a System Development Tool”, IEE Computing & Control Engineering, Jun./Jul. 2003. |
| Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/046720 7 pages (dated Dec. 11, 2018). |
| Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/38909, 8 pages {dated Oct. 11, 2019). |
| Xyratex Product Test brochure, “Automated Production Test Solutions”, 2006. |
| Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc., Amended Joint Trial Exhibit List of Xyratex and Teradvne. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx). Nov. 12, 2009. |
| Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc., Teradyne, Inc's Prior Art Notice Pursuant to 35; U.S.C. Section 282. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx), Oct. 16, 2009. |
| Xyratex to Debut its New Automated Test Solution for 2.5-inch Disk Drives at Diskcon USA 2004, PR Newswire Europe (2004). |
| Xyratex, “Continuous Innovation—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-system (1995-2008). |
| Xyratex, “Key Advantages—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-system (1995-2008). |
| Xyratex, “Process Challenges in the Hard Drive Industry” slide presentation, Asian Diskcon (2006). |
| Xyratex, “Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-system (1995-2008). |
| Xyratex, “Single cell—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-system (1995-2008). |
| Xyratex, “Storage Infrastructure” www.xyratex.com/Products/storage-infrastructure/default.aspx (1995-2008). |
| Xyratex, “Testing Drives Colder—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-system (1995-2008). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,827, Vision System for an Automated Test System, filed Oct. 22, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,824, Automated Test System, filed Oct. 22, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,816, Thermal Control System For An Automated Test System, filed Oct. 22, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,834, Modular Automated Test System, filed Oct. 22, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,804, Test Site Configuration In An Automated Test System, filed Oct. 22, 2020. |
| Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,834 dated Aug. 31, 2023, 9 pages. |
| Reply to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,834 filed May 2, 2023, 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,827 dated Sep. 5, 2023, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,827 dated Jun. 2, 2023, 8 pages. |
| Reply to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/077,827, filed Aug. 3, 2023, 11 pages. |
| Abraham et al., “Thermal Proximity Imaging of Hard-Disk Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Mathematics 36:3997-4004, Nov. 2000. |
| Abramovitch, “Rejecting Rotational Disturbances on Small Disk Drives Using Rotational Accelerometers”, Proceedings of the 1996 IFAC World Congress in San Francisco, CA, 8 pages (Jul. 1996). |
| Ali et al., “Modeling and Simulation of Hard Disk Drive Final Assembly Using a HDD Template” Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE pp. 1641-1650 (2007). |
| Anderson el al., “Clinical chemistry: concepts and applications”, The McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. DP. 131-132 2003. |
| Anderson et al., “High Reliability Variable Load Time Controllable Vibration Free Thermal Processing Environment”, Delphion, 3 pages (Dec. 1993). https://www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=93A +63418 (retrieved Mar. 18, 2009). |
| Asbrand, “Engineers at One Company Share the Pride and the Profits of Successful Product Design”, Professional Issues, 4 pages. 1987. |
| Bair et al., “Measurements of Asperity Temperatures of a Read/Write Head Slider Bearing in Hard Maanetic Recording Disks”, Journal of Tribology 113:547-554, Jul. 1991. |
| Bakken et al., “Low Cost, Rack Mounted, Direct Access Disk Storage Device”, Delphion, 2 pages (Mar. 1977). http://www.delp;hion.com/tdbs/tdb (retrieved Mar. 3, 2005). |
| Biber et al., “Disk Drive Drawer Thermal Management”, Advances in Electronic Packaging vol. 1:43-46, 1995. |
| Christensen, “How Can Great firms Fail? Insights from the hard Disk Drive Industry”, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 1-26, 2006. |
| Chung et al., “Vibration Absorber for Reduction of the In-plane Vibration in an Optical Disk Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vo. 48, May 2004. |
| Curtis et al., “InPhase Professional Archive Drive Architecture”, InPhase Technologies, Inc., 6 pages (Dec. 17. 2007) http://www.science.edu/TechoftheYear/Nominees/InPhase. |
| Exhibit 1 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd v. Teradyne, Inc.; Newspaper picture that displays the CSO tester; 1990. |
| Exhibit 1314 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “Last products of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 12, 1990. |
| Exhibit 1315 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “History of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 17, 1990. |
| Exhibit 1326 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd v. Teradyne, Inc.; Image of the back of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 photos, which display the photos dates; 1990. |
| Exhibit 2 In Xyratex Technology, Ltd v. Teradyne, Inc.; Photos of the CSO tester obtained from Hitachi; 1990. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,048 (50 pages) dated Feb. 18, 2020. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,104 (45 pages) dated Mar. 4, 2020. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,112 (43 pages) dated Dec. 11, 2019. |
| Findeis et al., “Vibration Isolation Techniques Suitable for Portable Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry”, Proc. SPIE vol. 4704, pp. 159-167, 2002; http://www.ndt.uct.ac.za/Paoers/soiendt2002.pdf. |
| FlexStar Technology, “A World of Storage Testing Solutions,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
| FlexStar Technology, “Environment Chamber Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
| FlexStar Technology, 30E/Cascade Users Manual, Doc #98-36387-00 Rev. 1.8, pp. 1-33, Jun. 1, 2004. |
| FlexStar Technology. “FlexStar's Family of Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999). |
| Frankovich, “The Basics of Vibration Isolation Using Elastomeric Materials”, Aearo EAR Specialty Composites, 8 pages (2005) http://www.isoloss.com/11dfs/engineering/Basicsofvibrationisolation. |
| Grochowski et al., “Future Trends in Hard Disk Drives”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 32(3): 1850-1854 (May 1996). |
| Gurumurthi et al., “Disk Drive Roadmap from the Thermal Perspective: A Case for Dynamic Thermal Management”, International Symposium on Computer Architecture Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Technical Report CSE-05-001, pp. 38-49 (Feb. 2005). |
| Gurumurthi et al., “Thermal Issues in Disk Drive Desian: Challenges and Possible Solutions”, ACM Transactions on Storage, 2(1): 41-73 (Feb. 2006). |
| Gurumurthi, “The Need for temperature-Aware Storage Systems”, The Tenth Intersociety conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronics, pp. 387-394, 2006. |
| Haddad et al., “A new Mounting Adapter For Computer Peripherals with Improved Reliability, Thermal Distribution, Low Noise and Vibration Reduction”, ISPS, Advances In Information Storage and Processing Systems. 1:97-108, 1995. |
| High Beam Research website “Credence announces Production Release of the EPRO AQ Series for Integrated Test and Back-end Processing”, 4 pages (1995). http://www.highbeam.com. |
| HighBeam Research website “ACT debuts six-zone catalytic gas heater. (American Catalytic Technologies offers new heaters)”, 4 pages (Oct. 26, 1998). http://www.highbeam.com. |
| HighBeam Research website “Asynchronous Testing Increases Throughout”, 7 pages (Dec. 1, 2000). http://www.highbeam.com. |
| HighBeam Research website “Test Multiple Parts At Once for Air Leaks. (Brief Article)”, 1 page (1999) http://www.highbeam.com. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/046720, 8 pages (dated Mar. 12, 2020). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/046725, 6 pages (dated Mar. 12, 2020). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/046734, 8 pages (dated Mar. 12, 2020). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/046740, 6 pages (dated Mar. 12, 2020). |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2016/046720. 3 pages (dated Dec. 11, 2018). |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2019/38909, 3 pages (dated Oct. 11, 2019). |
| Iwamiya, “Hard Drive Cooling Using a Thermoelectric Cooler”, EEP—vol. 19-2, Advances in Electronic Packaging, vol. 2:2203-2208, ASME 1997. |
| Johnson et al., “Performance Measurements of Tertiary Storage Devices”, Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference. New York. pp. 50-61 1998. |
| Ku, “Investigation of Hydrodynamic Bearing Friction in Data Storage information System Spindle Motors”, ISPS vol. 1, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 159-165, ASME 1995. |
| Lindner, “Disk drive mounting”, IBM Technical Disclosure Brochure, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 903-904 Aug. 1973. |
| Low, Y.L. et al., “Thermal network model for temperature prediction in hard disk drive”, Microsyst Technol, 15: 1653-1656 (2009). |
| McAuley, “Recursive Time Trapping for Synchronization of Product and Chamber Profiles for Stress Test”, Delphion, 3 pages (Jun. 1988), https://www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2009). |
| Morgenstern, Micropolis Drives Target High-end Apps; Technology Provides Higher Uninterrupted Data Transfer. (Applications; Microdisk AV LS 3020 and 1050AV and 1760AV LT Stackable Hard Drive Systems) (Product Announcement) MacWeek, vol. 8, No. 6, p. 8; Feb. 7, 1994. |
| Morris, “Zero Cost Power and Cooling Monitor System”, 3 pages (Jun. 1994) https://www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb (retrieved Jan. 15, 2008). |
| Nagarajan, “Survey of Cleaning and cleanliness Measurement in Disk Drive Manufacture”, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, (Feb. 13-21, 1997). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220128599 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
