Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to a system used in semiconductor manufacturing. More specifically, embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a system for biasing and clamping a substrate during plasma processing.
Ion bombardment is often used as a source of activation energy for chemical and physical processes in plasma etch and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes for processing a semiconductor substrate. High energy ions accelerated by plasma sheath are also highly directional and can be used for etching high aspect ratio features. Conventionally, a substrate may be biased using radio frequency (RF) power from an RF source. The RF source supplies an RF voltage to a first electrode embedded in an electrostatic chuck (ESC) or cathode. The first electrode is capacitively coupled to the plasma of a processing chamber through a layer of ceramic, which is a part of the ESC. Non-linear, diode-like nature of the plasma sheath results in rectification of the applied RF field, such that a direct-current (DC) voltage drop, or self-bias, appears between the substrate and the plasma. This voltage drop determines the average energy of the ions accelerated towards the substrate.
The ESC secures the substrate disposed thereon by applying a fixed DC voltage to a second electrode embedded in the ESC to establish an electric field between the ESC and the substrate. The electric field induces opposite polarity charges to accumulate on the substrate and the second electrode, respectively. The electrostatic attractive force between the oppositely polarized charges pulls the substrate toward the ESC to secure the substrate. However, the electrostatic force can be affected by the RF bias power supplied to the first electrode in the ESC, leading to under or over clamping of the substrate. In addition, as large bias voltage becomes many kilovolts, the fluctuation of the self-bias voltage with respect to the fixed DC voltage can lead to an increased risk of arcing or sudden de-clamping and breaking of the substrate. This is particularly a problem with very high bias power (kilovolts (kV) range) which is used during pulsed voltage type of substrate biasing techniques.
Therefore, an improved system for biasing and clamping a substrate is needed.
Embodiments of the disclosure may provide a plasma processing chamber, comprising a substrate support assembly, a waveform generator, a first power delivery line, a clamping network, a signal detection module, and a controller. The substrate support assembly comprises a substrate supporting surface, a first biasing electrode, and a first dielectric layer disposed between the first biasing electrode and the substrate supporting surface. The first power delivery line electrically couples the waveform generator to the first biasing electrode, wherein the first power delivery line comprises a blocking capacitor. The clamping network is coupled to the first power delivery line at a first point between the blocking capacitor and the biasing electrode, the clamping network comprising a direct-current (DC) voltage source coupled between the first point and ground, and a blocking resistor coupled between the first point and an output of the direct-current (DC) voltage source. The signal detection module is configured to receive a first electrical signal from a first signal trace that is coupled to the first power delivery line at a point disposed between the blocking capacitor and the biasing electrode. The controller is configured to communicate with the signal detection module and control a magnitude of a voltage supplied to the first power delivery line at the first point by the direct-current (DC) voltage source due to information received within the received electrical signal.
Embodiments of the disclosure may further provide a plasma processing chamber comprising a substrate support assembly, a waveform generator, a first power delivery line, a clamping network, and a signal detection module. The first power delivery line electrically couples the waveform generator to the first electrode, wherein the first power delivery line comprises a blocking capacitor. The clamping network is coupled to the first power delivery line at a first point between the blocking capacitor and the first electrode, the clamping network comprising a direct-current (DC) voltage source coupled between the first point and ground, and a blocking resistor coupled between the first point and the direct-current (DC) voltage source. The signal detection module is configured to receive a first electrical signal from a first signal trace that is coupled to the first power delivery line at a point disposed between the blocking capacitor and the first electrode.
Embodiments of the disclosure may further provide a method for plasma processing a substrate, comprising: generating a plasma within a processing region of a processing chamber, wherein the processing region comprises a substrate support that comprises a substrate supporting surface, a first biasing electrode, and a first dielectric layer disposed between the first biasing electrode and the substrate supporting surface; delivering, from a waveform generator, a plurality of pulsed-voltage waveforms to the first biasing electrode through a first power delivery line during a first time period, wherein the first power delivery line comprises a blocking capacitor that is disposed between the waveform generator and the biasing electrode; halting the delivery of the plurality of pulsed-voltage waveforms to the first biasing electrode during all of a second time period; applying, from a clamping network, a first clamping voltage to the first biasing electrode; detecting at least one characteristic of one or more of the delivered plurality of pulsed-voltage waveforms during the first time period by receiving an electrical signal from a signal trace that is coupled to the first power delivery line at a first point disposed between the blocking capacitor and the biasing electrode; detecting at least one characteristic of an electrical signal received from the signal trace during the second time period; and adjusting the first clamping voltage applied to the first biasing electrode based on the detected characteristic of the one or more of the delivered plurality of pulsed-voltage waveforms and the at least one characteristic of the electrical signal received from the signal trace during the first and second time periods.
Embodiments of the disclosure may further provide a method for plasma processing a substrate, comprising: generating a plasma within a processing region of a processing chamber, wherein the processing region comprises a substrate support that comprises a substrate supporting surface, a first biasing electrode, and a first dielectric layer disposed between the first biasing electrode and the substrate supporting surface; delivering, from a waveform generator, one or more waveforms to the first biasing electrode through a first power delivery line during a first time period; halting the delivery of the one or more waveforms to the first biasing electrode for a second time period; applying, from a clamping network, a first clamping voltage to the first biasing electrode; detecting at least one characteristic of the one or more waveforms during the first time period by receiving an electrical signal from a signal trace that is coupled to the first power delivery line at a first point disposed on the first power delivery line; detecting at least one characteristic of an electrical signal received from the signal trace during the second time period; and adjusting the first clamping voltage applied to the first biasing electrode based on the detected characteristic of the one or more waveforms received from the signal trace during the first time period; and the detected at least one characteristic of the electrical signal received from the signal trace during the second time period.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, and may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation.
Embodiments of the disclosure provided herein include an apparatus and methods for plasma processing of a substrate in a processing chamber. Aspects of one or more of the embodiments disclosed herein include a system and method of reliably biasing and clamping a substrate during processing to improve the plasma processing results. Embodiments of the disclosure may include an apparatus and method for providing a pulsed-voltage (PV) waveform delivered from one or more pulsed-voltage (PV) generators to one or more electrodes within the processing chamber, while biasing and clamping a substrate during a plasma process. In some embodiments, a radio frequency (RF) generated RF waveform is provided from an RF generator to one or more electrodes within a processing chamber to establish and maintain a plasma within the processing chamber, while PV waveform(s) delivered from a PV generator are configured to establish a nearly constant sheath voltage across the surface of a substrate. The established nearly constant sheath voltage across the surface of a substrate can create a desirable ion energy distribution function (IEDF) at the surface of the substrate during one or more plasma processing steps performed within the processing chamber. In some embodiments, the PV waveform is established by a PV generator that is electrically coupled to a biasing electrode disposed within a substrate support assembly disposed within a plasma processing chamber.
During some of the plasma processes, ions are purposely accelerated towards the substrate by the voltage drop formed in an electron-repelling sheath that forms over a substrate placed on top of a substrate-support assembly. While not intending to be limiting as to the scope of the disclosure provided herein, the substrate support assembly is often referred to herein as the “cathode assembly” or “cathode”.
During plasma processing, a vacuum pressure formed in a processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100 results in poor thermal conduction between surfaces of components disposed therein, such as between the dielectric material of the substrate support 105 and the substrate 103 disposed on the substrate receiving surface 105A, which reduces the substrate support's effectiveness in heating or cooling the substrate 103. Therefore, there is often a need for a thermally conductive inert heat transfer gas, typically helium, to be introduced and maintained at an increased pressure (e.g., backside pressure) within a volume (not shown) disposed between a non-device side surface of the substrate 103 and the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105 to improve the heat transfer therebetween. The heat transfer gas, provided by a heat transfer gas source (not shown), flows to the backside volume through a gas communication path (not shown) disposed through the support base 107 and further disposed through the substrate support 105.
In an effort to enable the higher relative pressure to be formed behind the substrate, a clamping voltage is applied to the biasing electrode 104 to “clamp” or “chuck” the substrate 103 to the substrate receiving surface 105A by use of a biasing and clamping network, which is also referred to herein as simply a clamping network 116. In some embodiments, the clamping network 116 includes a DC voltage source P2 (
The plasma potential of the plasma 101 formed in the processing region 129 varies due to the application of a pulsed voltage (PV) or RF bias to one or more electrodes disposed within a plasma processing chamber. As is discussed further below, to reliably generate a desired clamping voltage VDCV during a plasma process, the variations in the plasma potential need to be accounted for when controlling a clamping voltage applied to a clamping electrode and substrate 103 during processing. In one example, variations in the plasma potential will occur within each pulse of a multiple pulse PV waveform, and also as the characteristics of PV waveforms delivered by a PV generator 150 change as pulsed voltage biasing parameters applied to a biasing electrode are altered within a substrate-processing-recipe, or from substrate-processing-recipe to substrate-processing-recipe, used to process one or more substrates in the processing chamber. Conventional substrate clamping systems (e.g., electrostatic chucks) that provide a constant clamping voltage and do not take into account and adjust for the fluctuations in the plasma potential often provide poor plasma processing results and/or damage the substrate during processing.
However, the ability to reliably measure or determine in real time the variations in the plasma potential so that they can be accounted for during processing is not a trivial task. The ability to reliably measure the fluctuations or variations in the plasma potential so that the clamping voltage can be desirably adjusted in a production worthy plasma processing chamber that is able to sequentially process multiple substrates in a row is an additional challenge. Conventional methods of measuring the plasma potential and the substrate DC bias requires the use of a probe to directly measure substrate surface potential, are good for non-production laboratory testing, but their presence in the chamber can affect the plasma processing results. The conventional methods of estimating the plasma potential and the substrate DC bias are complicated and require the use of one or more models to correlate the directly measured substrate surface DC bias with the voltage, current and phase data to be measured at an RF match at a few calibration conditions, and use that model to estimate the plasma potential and substrate DC bias when used in production device fabrication processes. The apparatus and methods described herein can be used to reliably determine the plasma potential as a function of time and then provide adjustments to the clamping voltage based on the measured plasma potential.
The processing chamber 100 is configured to practice one or more of the biasing schemes proposed herein, according to one or more embodiments. In one embodiment, the processing chamber 100 is a plasma processing chamber, such as a reactive ion etch (RIE) plasma chamber. In some other embodiments, the processing chamber 100 is a plasma-enhanced deposition chamber, for example a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) chamber, a plasma enhanced physical vapor deposition (PEPVD) chamber, or a plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) chamber. In some other embodiments, the processing chamber 100 is a plasma treatment chamber, or a plasma based ion implant chamber, for example a plasma doping (PLAD) chamber. In some embodiments, the plasma source is a capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) source, which includes an electrode (e.g., chamber lid 123) disposed in the processing volume 129 facing the substrate support assembly 136. As illustrated in
The processing chamber 100 also includes a chamber body 113 that includes the chamber lid 123, one or more sidewalls 122, and a chamber base 124, which define the processing volume 129. The one or more sidewalls 122 and chamber base 124 generally include materials that are sized and shaped to form the structural support for the elements of the processing chamber 100, and are configured to withstand the pressures and added energy applied to them while a plasma 101 is generated within a vacuum environment maintained in the processing volume 129 of the processing chamber 100 during processing. In one example, the one or more sidewalls 122 and chamber base 124 are formed from a metal, such as aluminum, an aluminum alloy, or a stainless steel. A gas inlet 128 disposed through the chamber lid 123 is used to provide one or more processing gases to the processing volume 129 from a processing gas source 119 that is in fluid communication therewith. A substrate 103 is loaded into, and removed from, the processing volume 129 through an opening (not shown) in one of the one or more sidewalls 122, which is sealed with a slit valve (not shown) during plasma processing of the substrate 103. Herein, the substrate 103 is transferred to and from the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105 using a lift pin system (not shown).
The processing chamber 100 further includes a system controller 126, which is also referred to herein as a processing chamber controller. The system controller 126 herein includes a central processing unit (CPU) 133, a memory 134, and support circuits 135. The system controller 126 is used to control the process sequence used to process the substrate 103 including the substrate biasing methods described herein. The CPU 133 is a general purpose computer processor configured for use in an industrial setting for controlling processing chamber and sub-processors related thereto. The memory 134 described herein, which is generally non-volatile memory, may include random access memory, read only memory, floppy or hard disk drive, or other suitable forms of digital storage, local or remote. The support circuits 135 are conventionally coupled to the CPU 133 and comprise cache, clock circuits, input/output subsystems, power supplies, and the like, and combinations thereof. Software instructions (program) and data can be coded and stored within the memory 134 for instructing a processor within the CPU 133. A software program (or computer instructions) readable by CPU 133 in the system controller 126 determines which tasks are performable by the components in the processing chamber 100. Preferably, the program, which is readable by CPU 133 in the system controller 126, includes code, which when executed by the processor (CPU 133), perform tasks relating to the monitoring and execution of the electrode biasing scheme described herein. The program will include instructions that are used to control the various hardware and electrical components within the processing chamber 100 to perform the various process tasks and various process sequences used to implement the electrode biasing scheme and method of reliably biasing and clamping a substrate during a plasma process, which are described herein. In one embodiment, the program includes instructions that are used to perform one or more of the operations described below in relation to
In some embodiments, an RF source assembly 163, which includes an RF generator 118 and an RF generator assembly 160, is generally configured to deliver a desired amount of a continuous wave (CW) or pulsed RF power at a desired substantially fixed sinusoidal waveform frequency to the support base 107 based on control signals provided from the controller 126. During processing, the RF source assembly 163 is configured to deliver RF power to the support base 107 disposed proximate to the substrate support 105, and within the substrate support assembly 136. The RF power delivered to the support base 107 is configured to ignite and maintain a processing plasma 101 formed by use of processing gases disposed within the processing volume 129. In some embodiments, the support base 107 is an RF electrode that is electrically coupled to the RF generator 118 via an RF matching circuit 162 and a first filter assembly 161, which are both disposed within the RF generator assembly 160. The first filter assembly 161 includes one or more electrical elements that are configured to substantially prevent a current generated by the output of the PV waveform generator 150 from flowing through an RF power delivery line 167 and damaging the RF generator 118. The first filter assembly 161 acts as a high impedance (e.g., high Z) to the PV signal generated from a PV pulse generator P1 within the PV waveform generator 150, and thus inhibits the flow of current to the RF matching circuit 162 and RF generator 118.
In some embodiments, the plasma generator assembly 160 and RF generator 118 are used to ignite and maintain a processing plasma 101 using the processing gases disposed in the processing volume 129 and fields generated by the RF power provided to the support base 107 by the RF generator 118. The processing volume 129 is fluidly coupled to one or more dedicated vacuum pumps, through a vacuum outlet 120, which maintain the processing volume 129 at sub-atmospheric pressure conditions and evacuate processing and/or other gases, therefrom. The substrate support assembly 136, disposed in the processing volume 129, is disposed on a support shaft 138 that is grounded and extends through the chamber base 124. However, in some embodiments, the RF generator assembly 160 is configured to deliver RF power to the biasing electrode 104 disposed in the substrate support 105 versus the support base 107.
The substrate support assembly 136, as briefly discussed above, generally includes the substrate support 105 (e.g., ESC substrate support) and support base 107. In some embodiments, the substrate support assembly 136 can additionally include an insulator plate 111 and a ground plate 112, as is discussed further below. The support base 107 is electrically isolated from the chamber base 124 by the insulator plate 111, and the ground plate 112 is interposed between the insulator plate 111 and the chamber base 124. The substrate support 105 is thermally coupled to and disposed on the support base 107. In some embodiments, the support base 107 is configured to regulate the temperature of the substrate support 105, and the substrate 103 disposed on the substrate support 105, during substrate processing. In some embodiments, the support base 107 includes one or more cooling channels (not shown) disposed therein that are fluidly coupled to, and in fluid communication with, a coolant source (not shown), such as a refrigerant source or water source having a relatively high electrical resistance. In some embodiments, the substrate support 105 includes a heater (not shown), such as a resistive heating element embedded in the dielectric material thereof. Herein, the support base 107 is formed of a corrosion resistant thermally conductive material, such as a corrosion resistant metal, for example aluminum, an aluminum alloy, or a stainless steel and is coupled to the substrate support with an adhesive or by mechanical means.
Typically, the substrate support 105 is formed of a dielectric material, such as a bulk sintered ceramic material, such as a corrosion resistant metal oxide or metal nitride material, for example aluminum oxide (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), titanium oxide (TiO), titanium nitride (TiN), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), mixtures thereof, or combinations thereof. In embodiments herein, the substrate support 105 further includes the biasing electrode 104 embedded in the dielectric material thereof. In one configuration, the biasing electrode 104 is a chucking pole used to secure (i.e., chuck) the substrate 103 to the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105 and to bias the substrate 103 with respect to the processing plasma 101 using one or more of the pulsed-voltage biasing schemes described herein. Typically, the biasing electrode 104 is formed of one or more electrically conductive parts, such as one or more metal meshes, foils, plates, or combinations thereof.
The biasing electrode 104 within the electrostatic chuck (ESC) is electrically coupled to the biasing and clamping network 116, which are illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the processing chamber 100 further includes the quartz pipe 110, or collar, that at least partially circumscribes portions of the substrate support assembly 136 to prevent the substrate support 105, and/or the support base 107, from contact with corrosive processing gases or plasma, cleaning gases or plasma, or byproducts thereof. Typically, the quartz pipe 110, the insulator plate 111, and the ground plate 112 are circumscribed by a liner 108. In some embodiments, a plasma screen 109 is positioned between the cathode liner 108 and the sidewalls 122 to prevent plasma from forming in a volume underneath the plasma screen 109 between the liner 108 and the one or more sidewalls 122.
Structurally, in an electrostatic chuck (ESC) 191 version of the substrate support 105, the biasing electrode 104 is spaced apart from the substrate receiving surface 105A of the substrate support 105 by the layer of dielectric material 105B. Typically, electrostatic chucks (ESC) 191 can be categorized into two main classes of electrostatic chucks, which are known as a coulombic ESC or a Johnsen-Rahbek ESC. Depending on the type of electrostatic chuck 191, such as the coulombic ESC or the Johnsen-Rahbek ESC, the effective circuit elements used to describe the electrical coupling of the biasing electrode 104 to the plasma 101 will have some differences.
In the simplest case, such as the coulombic ESC case, the dielectric layer 105B will include a capacitance C1 as shown in
In a more complex case, such as the Johnsen-Rahbek ESC case, the circuit model includes a capacitance C1 that is coupled in parallel with a dielectric material resistance RJR and gap capacitance CJR as shown in
For ease of discussion, since the substrate 103 is typically made out of a semiconductor material and/or dielectric material with a thin layer of intrinsic dielectric layer on the bottom and top surfaces, the bottom dielectric layer of the substrate 103 can be considered to be electrically a part of the dielectric layer disposed between the biasing electrode 104 and the substrate receiving surface 105A. Thus, in some applications, the effective capacitance CE (not shown) formed between the biasing electrode 104 and the top surface of the substrate 103 can be approximated by the combined series capacitance of the dielectric material 105B and the substrate bottom layer (i.e., substrate capacitance Csub (
Referring back to
The electrical schematic representation of the circuit formed within the substrate support assembly 136 also includes a support base resistance RP, an insulator plate capacitance C3, and ground plate resistance RG that is coupled to ground on one end. Since the support base 107 and ground plate 111 are typically formed from a metal material the support base resistance RP and ground plate resistance RG are quite low, such as less than a few milliohms. The insulator plate capacitance C3 represents the capacitance of the dielectric layer positioned between the bottom surface of the support base 107 and the top surface of the ground plate 112. In one example, the insulator plate capacitance C3 has a capacitance between about 0.1 and about 1 nF.
Referring back to
In
The power delivery line 157 (
In some embodiments, as shown in
The clamping network 116, when used in combination, as shown in
Referring to
In some configurations, the blocking resistor R1 provides a charging/discharging path that is useful to reset the clamping voltage formed across capacitor C1, when the diode D1 is not in the forward bias mode. For example, at the beginning of a plasma process, the substrate is clamped to the electrostatic chuck surface 105A by charging the capacitor C1 to a predetermined voltage. Such charging current supplied to the capacitor C1 can be provided by the clamping network 116 through the resistor R1 (
In one embodiment of the processing chamber 100, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, as illustrated in
One or more of the input channels 172 can include a conditioning circuit 171, such as, for example, a conditioning circuit 1711 in input channel 1721 and a conditioning circuit 1712 in input channel 1722. Further, the one or more input channels 172 are configured to generate output waveforms that are conditioned. In some embodiments, the conditioning circuits 171 may each include a voltage divider, a low pass filters, both a voltage divider and a low pass filters, or even in some cases neither a voltage divider nor a low pass filter which is referred to herein as an unattenuated conditioning circuit. Examples of various conditioning circuit elements, such as voltage dividers and filters, and their integration with the input channels are further described in the U.S. Pat. No. 10,916,408, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The fast data acquisition module 120 is generally configured to receive analog voltage waveforms (e.g., conditioned waveforms) and transmit digitized voltage waveforms. The fast data acquisition module 120 includes one or more acquisition channels 122 that are each electrically coupled to a respective conditioning circuit 171 of a first input channel 172, and the fast data acquisition module 120 is configured to generate a digitized voltage waveform from a received conditioned voltage waveform (e.g., output waveform), wherein a data acquisition controller 123 of the fast data acquisition module 120 is configured to determine one or more waveform characteristics of the conditioned voltage waveform by analyzing the first digitized voltage waveform.
As illustrated in
The data acquisition controller 123 is electrically coupled to an output of each of the acquisition channels 122 and is configured to receive the digitized voltage waveform from each of the acquisition channels 122. Further, the algorithms stored within the memory 124 of the data acquisition controller 123 are adapted to determine one or more waveform characteristics of each of the conditioned waveforms by analyzing each of the digitized voltage waveforms. The analysis may include a comparison of information received in the digitized voltage waveform with information relating to one or more stored waveform characteristics that is stored in memory 124 and is discussed further below.
The data acquisition controller 123 can include one or more of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) (not shown), a processor 121 (
In various embodiments, the fast data acquisition module 120 additionally includes memory 124. The memory 124 may be any non-volatile memory. Further, the data acquisition controller 123 is electrically coupled with the memory 124 and is configured to cause waveform characteristics to be stored within the memory 124. In various embodiments, the memory 124 includes instructions executable by the data acquisition controller 123 to cause the data acquisition controller 123 to analyze the received output waveforms and/or transmit information corresponding to determined waveform characteristics based on the analysis of the received output waveforms. A waveform analyzer stored in memory 124 includes instructions executable by the data acquisition controller 123 and when executed cause the data acquisition controller 123 to analyze the output waveforms to determine the waveform characteristics. Information relating to the analyzed waveform characteristics can then be transmitted to one or more of a feedback processor 125 and/or the controller 126. The analysis performed by the data acquisition controller 123 can include a comparison of the waveform characteristics and one or more waveform characteristic threshold values stored in memory.
In some embodiments, the fast data acquisition module 120 is coupled to the feedback processor 125 via a data communication interface 125A, wherein the feedback processor 125 is configured to generate one or more control parameters using one or more waveform characteristics determined by one or more algorithms that are executed by the processor disposed within the data acquisition controller 123. In general, the feedback processor 125 may be any general computing processor. In some embodiments, the feedback processor 125 is generally one of: an external processor connected to the fast data acquisition module 120 via a data communication interface; an internal processor integrated within the fast data acquisition module 120; or is a portion of a substrate processing chamber controller (e.g., controller 126) connected to the fast data acquisition module via a data communication interface. The data acquisition module 120 may communicate information corresponding to one or more of the received output waveforms to the feedback processor 125. For example, the data acquisition module 120 may communicate information related to one or more detected and/or processed waveform characteristics of the one or more of the received output waveforms to the feedback processor 125. Further, the feedback processor 125 may be communicatively coupled with the plasma processing system 100 via a communication link 350 (
In various embodiments, the feedback processor 125 includes memory that further contains a software algorithm for instructing a processor within the feedback processor 125 to perform one or more portions of the methods described herein. The one or more algorithms include instructions, which when executed by the processor 121 in the fast data acquisition module cause the fast data acquisition module to process the one or more output waveforms (e.g., conditioned voltage waveforms) to determine one or more waveform characteristics of the received output waveforms. The controller 126, or feedback processor 125 disposed within the controller 126, includes memory that includes instructions, which when executed by a processor (CPU) causes the controller 126 or the feedback processor 125 to generate one or more control parameters using the determined one or more waveform characteristics provided from the fast data acquisition module 120. The instructions executed by the controller 126 or feedback processor 125 may also be further configured to cause the transmission of information, along the communication link 350 (
In one or more embodiments, the fast data acquisition module 120 may be electrically (wired or wirelessly) coupled with the controller 126 of the processing chamber 100. For example, the fast data acquisition module 120 transmits data to and/or receives data from the controller 126. For example, the fast data acquisition module 120 communicates information related to one or more waveform characteristics to the controller 126. Further, the processing chamber controller 126 may be communicatively coupled with the clamping network 116 of the processing chamber 100 via the communication link 350. In various embodiments, the processing chamber controller 126 is omitted. An algorithm stored within the memory of the processing chamber controller 126 can include instructions, which when executed by the controller CPU cause various process chamber set points to be adjusted, such as a chucking voltage set point on a chucking power supply, based on the information related to one or more waveform characteristics determined by the data acquisition controller 123.
As discussed above, the ability to provide real time control to the clamping voltage level applied to the clamping electrode (e.g., biasing electrode 104) during plasma processing is useful to improve and achieve repeatable plasma processing results and to assure that clamped substrates are not damaged during processing.
The system 300 is a simplified schematic which is generally represents a portion of the process chamber 100 that includes, for example, the PV waveform generator 150 of the first PV source assembly 196 (
As illustrated in
The PV waveform 301 is measured at a point between the blocking capacitor C5 and the biasing electrode 104, such as illustrated in
In some embodiments, a PV waveform (not shown) generated at the output of the PV waveform generator 150 is measured and utilized in one or more of the processes described herein by measuring the voltage formed at an electrical coupling assembly (not shown) that is positioned at node N3. The PV waveform measured at the PV waveform generator 150 will closely track the PV waveform 301, and will have a measured voltage that is offset from the PV waveform 301 by an amount that is at least related to the set point of DC voltage supply P2. In this configuration, as shown in
The PV waveform 302 is intended to represent the voltage established on a substrate 103 during processing due to the delivery of the PV waveforms provided from the PV waveform generator 150. As shown in
In some embodiment, the PV waveform 303 is measured at a node directly coupled to a second conductor plate positioned within the processing chamber 100. In one embodiment, the second conductor plate is the support base 107, which is positioned at node N5 in
In some embodiments, the PV waveform 304 is measured at a node directly coupled to a PV source 150. The measured voltage of the PV waveform 304, which is referred to herein as being voltage VR, varies over time as a series of bursts 316 and non-burst periods 314 are provided from a PV waveform generator 150. In some embodiments, the PV waveform 304 is configured to achieve a desired voltage V4 during the non-burst periods 314, and thus does not electrically float during the non-burst periods 314. In some embodiments, the PV waveform 304 is configured to electrically float during the non-burst periods 314. The PV waveform 304 can be measured by use of an electrical coupling assembly that is coupled to the signal trace 321 that is coupled to node N3 and is in communication with an input channel 172 within the signal detection module 188.
The output of the PV waveform generator 150, which can be controlled by a setting in a plasma processing recipe stored in the memory of the controller 126, forms the PV waveform 401 that includes a peak-to-peak voltage, which is also referred to herein as the pulse voltage level Vpp. The PV waveform 402, which is the waveform seen by the substrate 103 due to the delivery of the PV waveform 401, is characterized as including a sheath collapse and recharging phase 450 (or for simplicity of discussion the sheath collapse phase 450) that extends between point 420 and point 421, a sheath formation phase 451 that extends between point 421 and point 422, and an ion current phase 452 that extends between point 422 and back to the start at point 420 of the next sequentially established pulse voltage waveform. Depending on the desired plasma processing conditions, it is desirable to control and set at least the PV waveform characteristics, such as PV waveform frequency (1/TP), pulse voltage level Vpp, pulse voltage on-time, and/or other parameters of the PV waveforms within a burst 316 to achieve desirable plasma processing results on a substrate. In one example, pulse voltage (PV) on-time, which is defined as the ratio of the ion current time period (e.g., time between point 422 and the subsequent point 420 in
As illustrated in
To reliably generate a desired clamping voltage VDCV during a plasma process, the variations in the plasma potential need to be accounted for when delivering a clamping voltage to a clamping electrode during processing. As discussed above, the ability to reliably measure and monitor the plasma potential in a processing chamber that is configured to serially process multiple substrates in a production environment is a non-trivial task. In one or more of the embodiments of the disclosure provided herein, the plasma potential is determined based on measurements made at different points within the plasma processing system during different portions of a substrate processing sequence.
A plasma potential curve 433, which is shown in
In an effort to provide the desired clamping voltage (VDCV) at node N1, the set point of the DC voltage source P2, VBCM at node N2, is adjusted by use of computer implemented instructions that are configured to determine and thus account for the variation in the plasma potential. The desired clamping voltage (VDCV) set point is generally equal to the peak plasma potential (VPL), which is affected by the plasma processing conditions and the substrate surface material, plus the clamp voltage set point (Vclamp) for the type of electrostatic chuck that is being used during processing. The desired clamping voltage set point (VDCV) can thus be written as shown in equation (1).
VDCV=VPL+VClamp (1)
The clamp voltage set point (Vclamp) is a constant voltage value that has been determined through prior testing and evaluation of the electrostatic chucking characteristics of the actual electrostatic chuck or type of electrostatic chuck (e.g., columbic electrostatic chuck). The prior testing and evaluation results are used to determine a minimum substrate clamping force voltage to assure that the substrate will have a good thermal contact to the dielectric surface 105A and negligible helium will leak through the outer sealing band of the substrate support 105 when the substrate is clamped to the surface of the substrate support 105 during plasma processing. The clamp voltage set point (Vclamp) value will vary due to the type of electrostatic chuck that is being used (e.g., columbic or Johnsen-Rahbek electrostatic chuck), backside gas pressure being used during processing, and temperature of the dielectric 105A during plasma processing.
In some embodiments of the clamping network 116, a diode D1 electrically connects nodes N1 and N2 (See
VBCM=VDCV=VPL+VClamp
However, in some embodiments of the clamping network 116, no diode D1 is used to connect nodes N1 and N2 (see
As illustrated in
Equation (2) below is used to describe charge conservation at a node in the electrode biasing circuit, meaning the sum of electrostatic charge QBurst measured during a portion of the burst-on period 310 is equal to the amount of stored charge Qoff measured during the burst-off period 314 right after burst-on period 310.
ΣQBurst=ΣQOff (2)
In one example, based on the system 300 configuration illustrated in
C1(ΔV1)Burst+C2(ΔV2)Burst+C5(ΔV5)Burst=C1(ΔV1)Off+C2(ΔV2)Off+C5(ΔV5)Off (3)
In equation (3), C1, C2, and C5 are the capacitances that are known, and ΔV1, ΔV2, and ΔV5 are the voltages of the capacitor plates directly coupled to node N1 minus the voltages of the opposing capacitor plates for the capacitances C1, C2, and C5, which are measured during either the burst-on period 310 or burst-off period 314. Therefore, if the measurement made during the burst-on period 310 is made at one of the time T1 instants in time, and the measurement made during the burst-off period 314 is made at time T4, equation (3) can be rewritten as equation (4).
C1(V1−VPL)+C2(V1−V5)+C5(V1−V3)=C1(V2−0)+C2(V2−V6)+C5(V2−V4) (4)
In equation (4), the voltage V1 is the voltage of the electrode 104 at time T1 during the burst-on period 310, the peak plasma potential VPL is the plasma potential at time T1 during the burst-on period 310, the voltage V5 is the voltage measured at node N5 at time T1 during the burst-on period 310, the voltage V3 is the voltage measured at node N3 at time T1 during the burst-on period 310, the voltage V2 is the voltage measured at node N1 during the burst-off period 314, the voltage V6 is the voltage measured at node N5 during the burst-off period 314, and the voltage V4 is the voltage measured at node N3 during the burst-off period 314. As noted above, the plasma potential is effectively zero during the burst-off period and thus the charge stored in the capacitor C1 during the burst-off period 314 is effectively equal to the voltage V2 times the capacitance C1. The actual clamping voltage during burst off period is V2. Therefore, after reorganizing equation (4), which is shown in equation (5), the peak plasma potential VPL can be found by solving the equation (5) for the system configuration illustrated in
For simplicity of discussion, each of the capacitance terms that are multiplied by the voltage difference terms in equation (5), and any of the equations provided below, are generally referred to herein as a “combined circuit capacitance” that has a combined circuit capacitance value, which is determined by the arithmetic combination of the capacitances (e.g., capacitances C1, C2, and C5 in equation (5)) based on the configuration of the various connected circuit elements (e.g., electrostatic chuck 191, RF generator 118, and PV waveform generator 150) relative to a desired node (e.g., node N1).
However, in configurations where the biasing element (e.g., PV source 150) connected at node N3 floats during the burst-off period, or is disconnected from ground during the burst-off period, the capacitor C5 which is directly coupled to node N3 will not have current through it during the burst-on to burst-off transition. In other words, the charge stored in capacitor C5 is the same during the burst-on to burst-off transition, so its effect can be removed from the charge conservation equations (2), (3) and (4). The equation used to find the voltage VPL can be simplified to equation (6).
In some embodiments, there is negligible current flowing through the RF source assembly 163 to the capacitor C2 coupled at node N5 during the burst-on to burst-off transition, so that the majority of current flowing through C2 also flows through C3. Thus, the series of C2 and C3 can be treated as one capacitor of value (C2C3)/(C2+C3) and grounded. Thus, in equation (6), V5=V6=0 and C2 is replaced by (C2C3)/(C2+C3).
Therefore, since the capacitance C1 is typically much larger that the capacitances C2 and C3 in most systems, equation (7) can be reduced to the simple equation, in this example, of a floating biasing element, shown in equation (8).
VPL≈V1−V2 (8)
In any case, using either equations (5), (6), (7) or (8), the knowledge of the capacitance values of C1, C2, C3, and/or C5, and the measured voltages detected during the burst-on period 310 and burst-off period 314 by use of the signal detection module 188, the peak plasma potential VPL can be calculated so that the desired clamping voltage VDCV can be determined.
In another example, the biasing element (e.g., PV source 150) connected at node N3 is controlled at a constant voltage V4 (such as zero) during the burst-off period. In some embodiments, there is negligible current flowing through the RF source assembly 163 to the capacitor C2 coupled at node N5 during the burst-on to burst-off transition, so that the majority of current flowing through C2 also flows through C3. Then the voltage VPL can be found by solving equation (9) for the system configuration illustrated in
In this case, using equation (9), the knowledge of the capacitance values of C1, C2, C3, and/or C5, and the measured voltages during the burst-on period 310 and burst-off period 314 by use of the signal detection module 188, the peak plasma potential VPL can be calculated so that the desired clamping voltage VDCV can be determined.
In another example, based on the system 500 configuration illustrated in
C1(ΔV1)Burst+C2(ΔV2)Burst=C1(ΔV1)Off+C2(ΔV2)Off (10)
Therefore, voltage VPL can be found by use of equation (11).
In this case, using equation (11), the knowledge of the capacitance values of C1 and C2, and the measured voltages during the burst period 510 and burst-off period 514 by use of the signal detection module 188, the peak plasma potential VPL can be calculated so that the desired clamping voltage VDCV can be determined.
At operation 602, a processing recipe is initiated in a processing chamber 100, which causes a plasma 101 to form in the processing region 129 of the processing chamber 100. In some embodiments, during this operation, the RF source assembly 163 delivers enough RF power at an RF frequency to an electrode within the processing chamber to form the plasma 101. In one example, the RF source assembly 163 delivers RF power at an RF frequency of between 400 kHz and 100 MHz, such as 40 MHz to the support base 107 disposed within the substrate support assembly 136. The RF power delivered to the support base 107 is configured to ignite and maintain a processing plasma 101 formed by use of processing gases disposed within the processing volume 129.
At operation 604, the controller 126 sends a command signal to the DC voltage source P2 to initiate and establish a first clamping voltage at the biasing electrode 104. The magnitude of the first clamping voltage is set to the clamping voltage in the recipe which is stored in the memory of the controller 126. The recipe set point is generally set to a level that through initial testing or by general knowledge has a magnitude that is low enough to not cause breakdown of top dielectric layer within the substrate support, but has a magnitude high enough to achieve good thermal contact with the substrate receiving surface 105A in order to seal substrate backside gas (e.g. helium) sufficiently.
At operation 606, in one embodiment, the PV waveform generator 150 begins to generate a series of PV waveforms that establishes a PV waveform at the biasing electrode 104. During operation 606, the PV generator 150 can be configured to generate and provide bursts 316 of PV waveforms to the biasing electrode 104 within the processing chamber 100. In an alternate embodiment, the RF source assembly 163 begins to generate bursts of RF waveforms, as discussed in relation to
In some embodiments, during operation 606, it is desirable for the pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) applied to the electrode, such as the biasing electrode 104, to be controlled at a desired ramp rate that is not greater than the rate to charge or discharge the capacitors C5 and C6 through resistors R1 and R2 respectively, (
τ1=R1(C5) (12).
The charge or discharge rate of capacitor C6 through resistor R2 is determined by the RC time constant
τ2=R2(C6) (13).
Therefore, the ramp time for the pulse voltage level Vpp change should be larger than the RC time constants τ1 and τ2. In some embodiments, the ramp time for the pulse voltage level Vpp is set to be at least three times of the larger of the RC time constants τ1 and τ2.
At operation 608, while ramping pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) applied to the biasing electrode 104, the signal detection module 188 is used to monitor the waveforms established within different portions of the processing chamber 100 during the execution of the plasma processing recipe. In one example, the signal detection module 188 is configured to monitor the waveforms established at the biasing electrode 104 and the support base 107 over time, while the pulsed voltage level is ramped. In one example, the waveforms established at the biasing electrode 104 and the support base 107 can be detected by measuring waveform signals established at nodes N1 and N5 within the system 300 or 500 illustrated in
At operation 610, the information collected during operation 608 is used to calculate the plasma potential during the plasma process by use of at least one equation that is derived from equation (2), such as equations (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) or (11). The desired equation that is to be used to determine the peak plasma potential VPL is based on a knowledge of the system configuration that is being used during plasma processing and/or a setting found in the software instructions stored within memory. Typically, when the pulse voltage level, RF power, or other plasma relevant parameters (e.g. pressure, gas composition, etc.) are changing during plasma processing, one or more of the relevant equations, which are incorporated within the instructions stored in the memory of the controller 126, can be used during the execution of the stored instructions by the CPU 133 to determine the peak plasma potential VPL at any time during processing.
At operation 612, the desired clamping voltage VDCV that is to be used during a subsequent portion of the current plasma process is determined by use of equation (1) and the results of operation 610. As discussed above, the clamp voltage set point (VClamp) found in equation (1) is the clamp voltage set point in the recipe, typically a predetermined value that is stored within the memory of the controller 126.
At operation 614, a command signal is then sent by the controller 126, or the feedback processor 125, to the DC voltage source P2 so that a desired clamping voltage VDCV can be applied to the biasing electrode 104 by setting the DC voltage source P2 voltage properly, as discussed above. In some embodiments, operations 606-614 of the clamping voltage determination process 605 are repeated during the pulse voltage ramping phase at least one more time, or until a desired pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) is achieved during a burst-on period 310 during plasma processing. In some other embodiments, only operations 608-614 of the clamping voltage determination process 605 are repeated one or more times during plasma processing. In one example, operations 608-614 are repeated one or more times once the desired pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) has been achieved during a burst-on period 310.
After a steady state value for the pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) has been achieved after performing operation 608-614 one or more times, operation 616 is performed in which the set point of the DC voltage source P2, or DC voltage source output voltage VBCM, is stored in memory. In some embodiments, it is desirable to store intermediate set point of DC voltage source output voltage VBCM values (e.g., non-final values determined during the pulse voltage ramping phase) in memory so that they can be used as a baseline in a future plasma processing sequence. The set point of DC voltage source output voltage VBCM that is stored in memory can be used in future plasma processes performed on additional substrates that are processed using the same or similar plasma processing recipe. As briefly discussed above, plasma processing recipes generally include one or more processing steps that are adapted to control one or more plasma processing parameters performed on a substrate disposed within a processing chamber. The one or more plasma processing parameters can include PV waveform characteristics (e.g., duty cycle, pulse voltage level Vpp, burst period, burst off period, pulse voltage on-time, etc.), chamber pressure, substrate temperature, gas flow rates, gas composition, and other useful parameters. For example, the PV waveform generator 150 is set to provide pulses having a pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) from 0.01 kV to 10 kV and the DC voltage source output voltage VBCM of the clamping network 116 is set to a constant DC voltage between −3 kV to +3 kV, such as +2.5 kV.
Referring to
Referring to
At operation 652, a processing recipe is initiated in a processing chamber by forming a plasma 101 in the processing region 129 of a processing chamber. Operation 652 can be performed in a manner similar to methods described above in relation to operation 602.
At operation 654, the controller 126 sends a command signal to the DC voltage source P2 to initiate and establish a first clamping voltage at the biasing electrode 104. The magnitude of the first clamping voltage is set based on a set point in the processing recipe or stored in the memory of the controller 126. In one embodiment, the stored set point is based on a DC voltage source output voltage VBCM value used during a prior performed process, such as a result from the performance of one of the operations found in method 600.
At operation 656, in one embodiment, the PV waveform generator 150 begins to generate a series of PV waveforms that establish a PV waveform at the biasing electrode 104. In an alternate embodiment, the RF source assembly 163 begins to generate an RF waveform that establishes a RF waveform at an electrode, such as the support base 107, within the processing chamber 100. As discussed above in relation to operation 606, the pulse voltage level (e.g., Vpp) applied to the electrode is ramped within a time period that is larger (e.g. twice or three times larger) than the RC time constants to charge or discharge C5 through R1 and C6 through R2. Typically, operation 656 is performed in a manner that is similar to methods described above in relation to operation 606.
At operation 659, at the same time of operation 656, a command signal is sent by the controller 126, or the feedback processor 125, to the DC voltage source P2 to reach a set point of the DC voltage source output voltage VBCM so that a desired clamping voltage VDCV is applied to and maintained at the biasing electrode 104 by the DC voltage source P2 during at least a portion of the processing steps performed on the substrate. The method 650 can additionally be performed on all of the substrates that subsequently processed in the processing chamber. However, if one or more plasma processing recipe parameters are altered in any subsequent plasma processes it may be desirable to perform method 600 and then method 650 on all of the subsequent processes performed using these altered plasma processing recipe parameters.
In some embodiments, steps 608-614 in method 600 can be used repeatedly within a processing step to adjust for plasma property and peak plasma potential VPL drift which results in different DC voltage source output voltage VBCM of the DC voltage source P2 in order to maintain the clamp voltage set point VClamp.
In some embodiments, the amount of DC bias (VDC Bias) applied to a substrate during processing is calculated and then used to adjust one or more of the processing parameters during one or more portions of a plasma processing recipe. The DC bias at any time during plasma processing, in which a symmetric waveform (e.g., sinusoidal waveform (RF waveform) or sigmoidal waveform) is delivered, can be calculated by use of equation (14).
VDC Bias=(VPL−Vpp)/2 (14)
During one or more of the operations described herein, the signal detection module 188 and controller 126 are used to detect and monitor the waveform signals established at the various nodes within a system over time, so that one or more computer implemented instructions can be used to determine the DC bias and/or peak DC bias.
Aspects of one or more of the embodiments disclosed herein include a system and method of reliably biasing and clamping a substrate during processing to improve the plasma processing results performed on a plurality of substrates.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present disclosure, other and further embodiments of the disclosure may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4070589 | Martinkovic | Jan 1978 | A |
4340462 | Koch | Jul 1982 | A |
4464223 | Gorin | Aug 1984 | A |
4504895 | Steigerwald | Mar 1985 | A |
4585516 | Corn et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4683529 | Bucher, II | Jul 1987 | A |
4931135 | Horiuchi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4992919 | Lee et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5099697 | Agar | Mar 1992 | A |
5140510 | Myers | Aug 1992 | A |
5242561 | Sato | Sep 1993 | A |
5449410 | Chang et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451846 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464499 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5554959 | Tang | Sep 1996 | A |
5565036 | Westendorp et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5595627 | Inazawa et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597438 | Grewal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610452 | Shimer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5698062 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716534 | Tsuchiya et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5770023 | Sellers | Jun 1998 | A |
5796598 | Nowak et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810982 | Sellers | Sep 1998 | A |
5830330 | Lantsman | Nov 1998 | A |
5882424 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928963 | Koshiishi | Jul 1999 | A |
5933314 | Lambson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935373 | Koshimizu | Aug 1999 | A |
5948704 | Benjamin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5997687 | Koshimizu | Dec 1999 | A |
6043607 | Roderick | Mar 2000 | A |
6051114 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055150 | Clinton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074518 | Imafuku et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089181 | Suemasa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099697 | Hausmann | Aug 2000 | A |
6110287 | Arai et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117279 | Smolanoff et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125025 | Howald et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133557 | Kawanabe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136387 | Koizumi | Oct 2000 | A |
6187685 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197151 | Kaji et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198616 | Dahimene et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201208 | Wendt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214162 | Koshimizu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232236 | Shan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252354 | CoIlins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253704 | Savas | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277506 | Okamoto | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309978 | Donohoe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313583 | Arita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355992 | Via | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358573 | Raoux et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367413 | Sill et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392187 | Johnson | May 2002 | B1 |
6395641 | Savas | May 2002 | B2 |
6413358 | Donohoe | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6423192 | Wada et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433297 | Kojima et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435131 | Koizumi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451389 | Amann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456010 | Yamakoshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6483731 | Isurin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535785 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6621674 | Zahringer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6664739 | Kishinevsky et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6733624 | Koshiishi et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740842 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741446 | Ennis | May 2004 | B2 |
6777037 | Sumiya et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808607 | Christie | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818103 | Scholl et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818257 | Amann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830595 | Reynolds, III | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830650 | Roche et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849154 | Nagahata et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861373 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863020 | Mitrovic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896775 | Chistyakov | May 2005 | B2 |
6902646 | Mahoney et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917204 | Mitrovic et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6947300 | Pai et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962664 | Mitrovic | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970042 | Glueck | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972524 | Marakhtanov et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7016620 | Maess et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046088 | Ziegler | May 2006 | B2 |
7059267 | Hedberg et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104217 | Himor et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115185 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7126808 | Koo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147759 | Chistyakov | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151242 | Schuler | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166233 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183177 | Al-Bayati et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206189 | Reynolds, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218503 | Howald | May 2007 | B2 |
7218872 | Shimomura | May 2007 | B2 |
7226868 | Mosden et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265963 | Hirose | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274266 | Kirchmeier | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7305311 | van Zyl | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312974 | Kuchimachi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7408329 | Wiedemuth et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415940 | Koshimizu et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7440301 | Kirchmeier et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452443 | Gluck et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7479712 | Richert | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7509105 | Ziegler | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512387 | Glueck | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7535688 | Yokouchi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7586099 | Eyhorn et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586210 | Wiedemuth et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588667 | Cerio, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601246 | Kim et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609740 | Glueck | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618686 | Colpo | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633319 | Arai | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645341 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651586 | Moriya et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7652901 | Kirchmeier et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7692936 | Richter | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7700474 | Cerio, Jr. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705676 | Kirchmeier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706907 | Hiroki | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718538 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740704 | Strang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758764 | Dhindsa et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761247 | van Zyl | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7782100 | Steuber et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791912 | Walde | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795817 | Nitschke | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808184 | Chistyakov | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821767 | Fujii | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825719 | Roberg et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7858533 | Liu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888240 | Hamamjy et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898238 | Wiedemuth et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7929261 | Wiedemuth | Apr 2011 | B2 |
RE42362 | Schuler | May 2011 | E |
7977256 | Liu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988816 | Koshiishi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7995313 | Nitschke | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8044595 | Nitschke | Oct 2011 | B2 |
3055203 | Choueiry et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
8052798 | Moriya et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083961 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8110992 | Nitschke | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128831 | Sato et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8129653 | Kirchmeier et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133347 | Gluck et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133359 | Nauman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140292 | Wendt | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8217299 | Ilic et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221582 | Patrick et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236109 | Moriya et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284580 | Wilson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313612 | McMillin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313664 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333114 | Hayashi | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8361906 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8382999 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8383001 | Mochiki et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384403 | Zollner et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391025 | Walde et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8399366 | Takaba | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8419959 | Bettencourt et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8422193 | Tao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8441772 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456220 | Thome et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460567 | Chen | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466622 | Knaus | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8542076 | Maier | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551289 | Nishimura et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568606 | Ohse et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8603293 | Koshiishi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8632537 | McNall, III et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641916 | Yatsuda et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8685267 | Yatsuda et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704607 | Yuzurihara et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716114 | Ohmi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8716984 | Mueller et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8735291 | Ranjan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8796933 | Hermanns | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8809199 | Nishizuka | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821684 | Ui et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828883 | Rueger | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845810 | Hwang | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852347 | Lee et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884523 | Winterhalter et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8884525 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8889534 | Ventzek et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8895942 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8907259 | Kasai et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8916056 | Koo et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926850 | Singh et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8963377 | Ziemba et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8979842 | McNall, III et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993943 | Pohl et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9011636 | Ashida | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9039871 | Nauman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9042121 | Walde et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9053908 | Sriraman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059178 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9087798 | Ohtake et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9101038 | Singh et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9105447 | Brouk et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9105452 | Jeon et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9123762 | Lin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129776 | Finley et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9139910 | Lee et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147555 | Richter | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9150960 | Nauman et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9159575 | Ranjan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9208992 | Brouk et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209032 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209034 | Kitamura et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210790 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224579 | Finley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226380 | Finley | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9228878 | Haw et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9254168 | Palanker | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9263241 | Larson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9287086 | Brouk et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9287092 | Brouk et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9287098 | Finley | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9306533 | Mavretic | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9309594 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9313872 | Yamazawa | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9355822 | Yamada et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9362089 | Brouk et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9373521 | Mochiki et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9384992 | Narishige et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9396960 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9404176 | Parkhe et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9412613 | Manna et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9435029 | Brouk et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9483066 | Finley | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9490107 | Kim et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9495563 | Ziemba et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9496150 | Mochiki et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9503006 | Pohl et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520269 | Finley et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9530667 | Rastogi et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9536713 | Van Zyl et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9544987 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9558917 | Finley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9564287 | Ohse et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9570313 | Ranjan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9576810 | Deshmukh et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9576816 | Rastogi et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9577516 | Van Zyl | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9583357 | Long et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9593421 | Baek et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9601283 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9601319 | Bravo et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9607843 | Rastogi et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9620340 | Finley | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9620376 | Kamp et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9620987 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9637814 | Bugyi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9644221 | Kanamori et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9651957 | Finley | May 2017 | B1 |
9655221 | Ziemba et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9663858 | Nagami et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9666446 | Tominaga et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9666447 | Rastogi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9673027 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9673059 | Raley et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9685297 | Carter et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9706630 | Miller et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711331 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711335 | Christie | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9728429 | Ricci et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9734992 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741544 | Van Zyl | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9754768 | Yamada et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9761419 | Nagami | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9761459 | Long et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9767988 | Brouk et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9786503 | Raley et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9799494 | Chen et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805916 | Konno et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805965 | Sadjadi et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9812305 | Pelleymounter | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9831064 | Konno et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9837285 | Tomura et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9840770 | Klimczak et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852889 | Kellogg et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9852890 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9865471 | Shimoda et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865893 | Esswein et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9870898 | Urakawa et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9872373 | Shimizu | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9881820 | Wong et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9922802 | Hirano et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9922806 | Tomura et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9929004 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941097 | Yamazawa et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941098 | Nagami | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960763 | Miller et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9972503 | Tomura et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9997374 | Takeda et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10020800 | Prager et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10026593 | Alt et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10027314 | Prager et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10041174 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10042407 | Grede et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10063062 | Voronin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10074518 | Van Zyl | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10085796 | Podany | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10090191 | Tomura et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10102321 | Povolny et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109461 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10115567 | Hirano et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10115568 | Kellogg et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10176970 | Nitschke | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10176971 | Nagami | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10181392 | Leypold et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10199246 | Koizumi et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10217618 | Larson et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10217933 | Nishimura et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10224822 | Miller et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10229819 | Hirano et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10249498 | Ventzek et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10268846 | Miller et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269540 | Carter et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10276420 | Ito et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10282567 | Miller et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10283321 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10290506 | Ranjan et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10297431 | Zelechowski et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10304661 | Ziemba et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10304668 | Coppa et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10312048 | Dorf et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10312056 | Collins et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10320373 | Prager et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10332730 | Christie | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10340123 | Ohtake | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10348186 | Schuler et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10354839 | Alt et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373755 | Prager et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10373804 | Koh et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10373811 | Christie et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10381237 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10382022 | Prager et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10387166 | Preston et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10388544 | Ui et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10389345 | Ziemba et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410877 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10431437 | Gapi{right arrow over (n)}ski et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10438797 | Cottle et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446453 | Coppa et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10447174 | Porter, Jr. et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10448494 | Dorf et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10448495 | Dorf et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10453656 | Carducci et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10460910 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10460911 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10460916 | Boyd, Jr. et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10483089 | Ziemba et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10483100 | Ishizaka et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10510575 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522343 | Tapily et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10535502 | Carducci et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10546728 | Carducci et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10553407 | Nagami et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10555412 | Dorf et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10580620 | Carducci et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10593519 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10607813 | Fairbairn et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10607814 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10658189 | Hatazaki et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10659019 | Slobodov et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10665434 | Matsumoto et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10666198 | Prager et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10672589 | Koshimizu et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10672596 | Brcka | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10672616 | Kubota | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685807 | Dorf et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10707053 | Urakawa et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10707054 | Kubota | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10707055 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10707086 | Yang et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10707090 | Takayama et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10707864 | Miller et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10714372 | Chua et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10720305 | Van Zyl | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10734906 | Miller et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10748746 | Kaneko et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10755894 | Hirano et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763150 | Lindley et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10773282 | Coppa et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10774423 | Janakiraman et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10777388 | Ziemba et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790816 | Ziemba et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10791617 | Dorf et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10796887 | Prager et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10804886 | Miller et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10811227 | Van Zyl et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10811228 | Van Zyl et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10811229 | Van Zyl et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10811230 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10811296 | Cho et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10847346 | Ziemba et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10892140 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892141 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10896807 | Fairbairn et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10896809 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10903047 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10904996 | Koh et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10916408 | Dorf et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923320 | Koh et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923321 | Dorf et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923367 | Lubomirsky et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923379 | Liu | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10971342 | Engelstaedter et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10978274 | Kubota | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10978955 | Ziemba et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985740 | Prager et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991553 | Ziemba et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991554 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998169 | Ventzek et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11004660 | Prager et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011349 | Brouk et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11075058 | Ziemba et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11095280 | Ziemba et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11101108 | Slobodov et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11108384 | Prager et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20010003298 | Shamouilian et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009139 | Shan et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010033755 | Ino et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020069971 | Kaji et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078891 | Chu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030026060 | Hiramatsu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030029859 | Knoot et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049558 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052085 | Parsons | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079983 | Long et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091355 | Jeschonek et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137791 | Arnet et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151372 | Tsuchiya et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165044 | Yamamoto | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201069 | Johnson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040040665 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040040931 | Koshiishi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066601 | Larsen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040112536 | Quon | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040223284 | Iwami et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050022933 | Howard | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050024809 | Kuchimachi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039852 | Roche et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050092596 | Kouznetsov | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098118 | Amann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151544 | Mahoney et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152159 | Isurin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050286916 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075969 | Fischer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130767 | Herchen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139843 | Kim | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158823 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171848 | Roche et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060219178 | Asakura | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278521 | Stowell | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070113787 | Higashiura et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114981 | Vasquez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070196977 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070284344 | Todorov et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285869 | Howald | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297118 | Fujii | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012548 | Gerhardt et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037196 | Yonekura et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048498 | Wiedemuth et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080106842 | Ito et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135401 | Kadlec et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160212 | Koo | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185537 | Walther et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210545 | Kouznetsov | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236493 | Sakao | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252225 | Kurachi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272706 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289576 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090016549 | French et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059462 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078678 | Kojima | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090133839 | Yamazawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090236214 | Janakiraman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090295295 | Shannon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018648 | Collins et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025230 | Ehiasarian et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100029038 | Murakawa | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100072172 | Ui et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100101935 | Chistyakov et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118464 | Matsuyama | May 2010 | A1 |
20100154994 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100193491 | Cho et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100271744 | Ni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276273 | Heckman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321047 | Zollner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326957 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110096461 | Yoshikawa et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100807 | Matsubara et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143537 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157760 | Willwerth et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177669 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177694 | Chen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110259851 | Brouk et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281438 | Lee et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298376 | Kanegae | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000421 | Miller et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052599 | Brouk et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081350 | Sano et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120088371 | Ranjan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097908 | Willwerth et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120171390 | Nauman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120319584 | Brouk et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130050892 | Kuthi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059448 | Marakhtanov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130087447 | Bodke et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130175575 | Ziemba et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130213935 | Liao et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214828 | Valcore, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130340938 | Tappan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344702 | Nishizuka | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140057447 | Yang | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061156 | Brouk et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062495 | Carter et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140077611 | Young et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140109886 | Singleton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140117861 | Finley et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125315 | Kirchmeier et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140154819 | Gaff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177123 | Thach et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140238844 | Chistyakov | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140262755 | Deshmukh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263182 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273487 | Deshmukh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140305905 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140356984 | Ventzek et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361690 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002018 | Lill et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150043123 | Cox | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150076112 | Sriraman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150084509 | Yuzurihara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150111394 | Hsu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116889 | Yamasaki et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150130354 | Leray et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150130525 | Miller et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150170952 | Subramani et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181683 | Singh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150235809 | Ito et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150256086 | Miller et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150303914 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150315698 | Chistyakov | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150318846 | Prager et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150325413 | Kim et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150366004 | Nangoy et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004475 | Beniyama et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020072 | Brouk et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027678 | Parkhe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160056017 | Kim et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160064189 | Tandou et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160196958 | Leray et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160241234 | Mavretic | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160284514 | Hirano | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160314946 | Pelleymounter | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160322242 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327029 | Ziemba et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160351375 | Valcore, Jr. et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160358755 | Long et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170011887 | Deshmukh et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170018411 | Sriraman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170022604 | Christie et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170029937 | Chistyakov et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170069462 | Kanarik et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170076962 | Engelhardt | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170098527 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170098549 | Agarwal | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170110335 | Yang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170110358 | Sadjadi et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113355 | Genetti et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170115657 | Trussell et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170117172 | Genetti et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170154726 | Prager et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170162417 | Ye et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170163254 | Ziemba et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170169996 | Ui et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170170449 | Alexander et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178917 | Kamp et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170221682 | Nishimura et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236688 | Caron et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236741 | Angelov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236743 | Severson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243731 | Ziemba et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250056 | Boswell et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170263478 | McChesney et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170278665 | Carter et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287791 | Coppa et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170311431 | Park | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170316935 | Tan et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330734 | Lee et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170330786 | Genetti et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170334074 | Genetti et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170358431 | Dorf et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170366173 | Miller et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170372912 | Long et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180019100 | Brouk et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180076032 | Wang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180102769 | Prager et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180139834 | Nagashima et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180166249 | Dorf et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180189524 | Miller et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190501 | Ueda | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204708 | Tan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180205369 | Prager et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180218905 | Park et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226225 | Koh et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226896 | Miller et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180253570 | Miller et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180286636 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180294566 | Wang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180309423 | Okunishi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180331655 | Prager et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180350649 | Gomm | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180366305 | Nagami et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180374672 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190027344 | Okunishi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190080884 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190090338 | Koh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096633 | Pankratz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190157041 | Zyl et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157042 | Van Zyl et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157044 | Ziemba et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190172685 | Van Zyl et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190172688 | Ueda | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190180982 | Brouk et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198333 | Tokashiki | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190259562 | Dorf et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267218 | Wang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190277804 | Prager et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295769 | Prager et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295819 | Okunishi et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190318918 | Saitoh et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333741 | Nagami et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190341232 | Thokachichu et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348258 | Koh et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348263 | Okunishi | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190363388 | Esswein et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190385822 | Marakhtanov et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190393791 | Ziemba et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200016109 | Feng et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200020510 | Shoeb et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200024330 | Chan-Hui et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035457 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035458 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035459 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200036367 | Slobodov et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200037468 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200043703 | French | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200051785 | Miller et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200051786 | Ziemba et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200058475 | Engelstaedter et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200066497 | Engelstaedter et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200066498 | Engelstaedter et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200075293 | Ventzek et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090905 | Brouk et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200106137 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200126760 | Ziemba et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200126837 | Kuno et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200144030 | Prager et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200161091 | Ziemba et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200161098 | Cui et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200161155 | Rogers et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200162061 | Prager et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168436 | Ziemba et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168437 | Ziemba et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200176221 | Prager et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227230 | Ziemba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200227289 | Song et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200234922 | Dorf | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200234923 | Dorf | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243303 | Mishra et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200251371 | Kuno et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200266022 | Dorf et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200266035 | Nagaiwa | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200294770 | Kubota | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200328739 | Miller et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200352017 | Dorf et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200357607 | Ziemba et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373114 | Prager et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200389126 | Prager et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200407840 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411286 | Koshimizu et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210005428 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210013006 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210013011 | Prager et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210013874 | Miller et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210027990 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210029815 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210043472 | Koshimizu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210051792 | Dokan et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210066042 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210082669 | Koshiishi et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210091759 | Prager et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210125812 | Ziemba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210130955 | Nagaike et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210140044 | Nagaike et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210151295 | Ziemba et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210152163 | Miller et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210210313 | Ziemba et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210210315 | Ziemba et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210249227 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210272775 | Koshimizu | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210288582 | Ziemba et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101990353 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102084024 | Jun 2011 | CN |
101707186 | Feb 2012 | CN |
105408993 | Mar 2016 | CN |
106206234 | Dec 2016 | CN |
104752134 | Feb 2017 | CN |
665306 | Aug 1995 | EP |
983394 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1119033 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1203441 | May 2002 | EP |
1214459 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1418670 | May 2004 | EP |
1691481 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1701376 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1708239 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1780777 | May 2007 | EP |
1852959 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2096679 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2221614 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2541584 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2580368 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2612544 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2838112 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2991103 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3086359 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3396700 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3616234 | Mar 2020 | EP |
H08236602 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2748213 | May 1998 | JP |
H11025894 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2002-313899 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002299322 | Oct 2002 | JP |
4418424 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2011035266 | Feb 2011 | JP |
5018244 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2014112644 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2016-225439 | Dec 2016 | JP |
6741461 | Aug 2020 | JP |
100757347 | Sep 2007 | KR |
10-2007-0098556 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20160042429 | Apr 2016 | KR |
20190129745 | Nov 2019 | KR |
20200036947 | Apr 2020 | KR |
498706 | Aug 2002 | TW |
201717247 | May 2017 | TW |
1998053116 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2000017920 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2000030147 | May 2000 | WO |
2000063459 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2001005020 | Jan 2001 | WO |
2001012873 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001013402 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2002052628 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002054835 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002059954 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2003037497 | May 2003 | WO |
2003052882 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003054911 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003077414 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004084394 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005124844 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007118042 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008016747 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008050619 | May 2008 | WO |
2008061775 | May 2008 | WO |
2008061784 | May 2008 | WO |
2008062663 | May 2008 | WO |
2009012804 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009069670 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009111473 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011073093 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011087984 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011156055 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012030500 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012109159 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122064 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013000918 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013016619 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013084459 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013088677 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013099133 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013114882 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013118660 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013125523 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013187218 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014035889 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014035894 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014035897 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014036000 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014036000 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014124857 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014197145 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015060185 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2014124857 | May 2015 | WO |
2015134398 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015198854 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016002547 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016059207 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016060058 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016060063 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2015073921 | May 2016 | WO |
2016104098 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016128384 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2016131061 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2016170989 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2017172536 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2017208807 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2018048925 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018111751 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018170010 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018197702 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2019036587 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019040949 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019099102 | May 2019 | WO |
2019099870 | May 2019 | WO |
2019185423 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019225184 | Nov 2019 | WO |
2019239872 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2019244697 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2019244698 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2019244734 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2019245729 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2020004048 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020017328 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020022318 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020022319 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020026802 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020036806 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020037331 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020046561 | Mar 2020 | WO |
2020051064 | Mar 2020 | WO |
2020112921 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020121819 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020145051 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2021003319 | Jan 2021 | WO |
2021062223 | Apr 2021 | WO |
2021097459 | May 2021 | WO |
2021134000 | Jul 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/027892 dated Aug. 26, 2022. |
Wang, S.B., et al.—“Control of ion energy distribution at subsliales during plasma processing,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 88, No. 2, Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 643-646. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies presentation by Dr Kenneth E. Miller—“The EHT Integrated Power Module (IPM) An IGBT-Based, High Current, Ultra-Fast, Modular, Programmable Power Supply Unit,” Jun. 2013, 21 pages. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“EHT Integrator Demonstration at DIII-D,” 2015, 1 page. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“High Gain and Frequency Ultra-Stable Integrators for ICC and Long Pulse ITER Applications,” 2012, 1 page. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—High Gain and Frequency Ultra-Stable Integrators for Long Pulse and/or High Current Applications, 2018, 1 page. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“In Situ Testing of EHT Integrators on a Tokamak,” 2015, 1 page. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies webpage—“Long-Pulse Integrator Testing with DIII-D Magnetic Diagnostics,” 2016, 1 page. |
Kamada, Keiichi, et al., Editors—“New Developments of Plasma Science with Pulsed Power Technology,” Research Report, NIFS-PROC-82, presented at National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu, Japan, Mar. 5-6, 2009, 109 pages. |
Prager, J.R., et al.—“A High Voltage Nanosecond Pulser with Variable Pulse Width and Pulse Repetition Frequency Control for Nonequilibrium Plasma Applications,” IEEE 41st International Conference on Plasma Sciences (ICOPS) held with 2014 IEEE International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams (BEAMS), pp. 1-6, 2014. |
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (SCILLC)—“Switch-Mode Power Supply” Reference Manual, SMPSRM/D, Rev. 4, Apr. 2014, ON Semiconductor, 73 pages. |
Sunstone Circuits—“Eagle Harbor Tech Case Study,” date unknown, 4 pages. Date is not provided. |
ELECTRICAL 4 U webpage—“Clamping Circuit,” Aug. 29, 2018, 1 page. |
Yung Chae Yang et al., A study on the etching characteristics of magnetic tunneling junction materials using DC pulse-biased inductively coupled plasmas, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, 01AE01, Oct. 29, 2014, 6 pages. |
Richard Barnett et al. A New Plasma Source for Next Generation MEMS Deep Si Etching: Minimal Tilt, Improved Profile Uniformity and Higher Etch Rates, SPP Process Technology Systems. 2010. |
S.B. Wang et al. “Ion Bombardment Energy and SiO 2/Si Fluorocarbon Plasma Etch Selectivity”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 19, 2425 (2001). |
Zhen-hua Bi et al., A brief review of dual-frequency capacitively coupled discharges, Current Applied Physics, vol. 11, Issue 5, Supplement, 2011, pp. S2-S8. |
Chang, Bingdong, “Oblique angled plasma etching for 3D silicon structures with wiggling geometries” 31(8), [085301]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab53fb. DTU Library. 2019. |
Michael A. Lieberman, “A short course of the principles of plasma discharges and materials processing”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. Date is not provided. |
Dr. Steve Sirard, “Introduction to Plasma Etching”, Lam Research Corporation. 64 pages. Date is not provided. |
Zhuoxing Luo, B.S., M.S, “Rf Plasma Etching With a DC Bias” A Dissertation in Physics. Dec. 1994. |
Michael A. Lieberman, “Principles of Plasma Discharges and Material Processing”, A Wiley Interscience Publication. 1994. |
Yiting Zhang et al. “Investigation of feature orientation and consequences of ion tilting during plasma etching with a three-dimensional feature profile simulator”, Nov. 22, 2016. |
Lin, Jianliang, et al.,—“Diamond like carbon films deposited by HiPIMS using oscillatory voltage pulses,” Surface & Coatings Technology 258, 2014, published by Elsevier B.V., pp. 1212-1222. |
Eagle Harbor Technologies presentation by Dr. Kenneth E. Miller—“The EHT Long Pulse Integrator Program,” ITPA Diagnostic Meeting, General Atomics, Jun. 4-7, 2013, 18 pages. |
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/040380; dated Oct. 27, 2021; 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 4, 2022 for Application No. PCT/US2021/054806. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 4, 2022 for Application No. PCT/US2021/054814. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/346,103, filed Jun. 11, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/349,763, filed Jun. 16, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/242,410, filed Sep. 9, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/410,803, filed Aug. 24, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/537,107, filed Nov. 29, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/352,165, filed Jun. 18, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/352,176, filed Jun. 18, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/337,146, filed Jun. 2, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/361,178, filed Jun. 28, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/210,956, filed Jun. 15, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/475,223, filed Sep. 14, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/537,314, filed Nov. 29, 2021. |
Chinese Office Action for 201880053380.1 dated Dec. 2, 2021. |
Taiwan Office Action for 108132682 (APPM/44016030TW01dated Mar. 24, 2022. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 9, 2018, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/043032. |
Taiwan Office Action for Application No. 107125613 dated Dec. 24, 2020, 16 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2018, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/042965. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/052067 dated Jan. 21, 2020. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2019/048392; dated Dec. 16, 2019; 13 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2018, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/042961. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2018, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/042956. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/433,204; entitled Creating Arbitrarily-Shaped Ion Energy Distribution Function (IEDF) Using Shaped-Pulse (EV) Bias; by Leonid Dorf, et al.; filed Dec. 16, 2016; 22 total pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/424,405; entitled System for Tunable Workpiece Biasing in a Plasma Reactor; by Travis Koh, et al.; filed Feb. 3, 2017; 29 total pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,082; entitled Systems and Methods for Controlling a Voltage Waveform at a Substrate During Plasma Processing; by Leonid Dorf, et al.; filed Jun. 8, 2017; 35 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2018/046171; dated Nov. 28, 2018; 10 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2018/046182; dated Nov. 30, 2018; 10 total pages. |
PCT/US2020/014453 Interanational Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2020 consists of 8 pages. |
Korean Office Action for 10-2020-7007495 dated Jun. 14, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220367157 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |