Field
The invention relates to a capacitive micromechanical sensor structure. The invention relates also to a micromechanical accelerometer comprising two capacitive micromechanical sensor structures.
Description of the Related Art
In-plane acceleration detection in MEMS accelerometer is usually done with closing gap combs (parallel plate capacitor) or with linear combs (longitudinal capacitor).
In closing gap combs the capacitance behavior of the comb fingers can be approximately modeled by a parallel plate capacitor with varying finger gap and constant area according to equation (1)
where C is capacitance, ε is permittivity, A finger area, d finger gap, x finger displacement and Cf static stray capacitance. Comb fingers move in measurement mode closer to each other eventually causing the gap between the fingers to close.
In linear combs comb fingers move parallel to each other and capacitance behavior can be modeled by a parallel plate capacitor with varying area and constant finger gap according to equation (2)
where l is finger overlap length and h finger height.
Closing gap combs and linear combs have very different advantages and disadvantages. A closing gap comb can produce larger signals but a small gap between fingers makes the signal very nonlinear and it is hard to make an accelerometer that fulfills modern accelerometer requirements with finger side gaps under 2 micrometers. Also a process has to be able to manufacture a stopper gap with significantly smaller gap size than the measurement gap. Small finger side gaps cause reliability issues as electrical forces and mechanical sticking forces become close to returning spring forces. A linear comb, on the other hand, has smaller sensitivity with the same displacement, but the signal is linear. Linear combs also do not have pull-in effect in measurement direction and therefore sticking issues can be minimized.
The object of the invention is to provide a micromechanical accelerometer structure that is robust against sticking, easy to manufacture and test, enables the use of high measurement voltage and maximizes linearity while maintaining high sensitivity and damping.
The proposed capacitive micromechanical sensor structure uses advantageous aspects of both closing gap and linear combs.
In the proposed capacitive micromechanical sensor structure the signal comes in significant part from the linear comb structure by varying the finger overlap length i.e. the capacitor area between rotor fingers of the rotor finger structure along at least one side of the rotor finger support beam and stator fingers of the stator finger support structure along at least one side of the stator finger support beam and from the closing gap comb structure by varying the fingertip gap i.e. the capacitor gap between rotor fingertips of the rotor finger structure along at least one side of the rotor finger support beam and the stator finger support beam and/or the capacitor gap between stator fingertips of the stator finger structure along at least one side of the stator finger support beam and the rotor finger support beam.
This novel design also provides for a new tunable parameter (fingertip gap) to tune the sensor performance. In the proposed capacitive micromechanical sensor structure sensitivity can be maintained in a level comparable to closing gap combs by keeping the fingertip gap between the rotor fingers of the rotor finger structure along said at least one side of the rotor finger support beam and the stator finger support beam and/or by keeping the fingertip gap between the stator fingers of the stator finger structure along said at least one side of the stator finger support beam and the rotor finger support beam small, such as 1 to 3 times the finger side gap between rotor fingers of the rotor finger structure along said at least one side of the rotor finger support beam and stator fingers of the stator finger support structure along said at least one side of the stator finger support beam. The result of this is that the sensitivity may increase by 20-50 percent compared to a pure linear comb. It also gives new possibilities to maximize linearity without lowering parasitic resonance frequencies.
By correctly choosing the fingertip gap, the finger side gap and the stopper gap, provided that the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure is provided with stopper bumps, it is possible to manufacture a micromechanical sensor that has no pull-in effect in measurement direction. This decreases the risk of sticking considerably and enables the use of higher measurement voltage in ASIC that makes ASIC design easier. Elimination of the pull-in effect increases testing robustness and reliability during operation.
The proposed micromechanical accelerometer structure can be used to optimize damping and noise. High damping in accelerometer increases noise but makes sensor more robust against vibrations. High gas damping in closing comb structures can be a problem especially with very small finger side gaps. In closing gap combs it is necessary to use a stopper gap with significantly smaller gap size than the measurement gap to avoid short-circuiting and sticking. This is the most demanding feature in the accelerometer design for lithography and DRIE processes. In the proposed capacitive micromechanical sensor structure the fingertip gap is preferably, but not necessarily, made larger than finger side gap. As a result of this the measurement direction stopper gap can be made equal to finger side gap so relaxing the aspect ratio requirement of the manufacturing process.
In the following the invention will described in more detail by referring to the figures, of which
First the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure and some preferred embodiments and variants thereof will be described in greater detail.
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure comprises a stator structure 1 rigidly anchored to a substrate 2 and a rotor structure 3 movably anchored by means of spring structures 4; 4a, 4b to the substrate 2.
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure may at least partly be fabricated out of a silicon substrate.
The stator structure 1 has a plurality of stator finger support beams 5.
In the embodiments shown in the figures, the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure has first spaces 6 between two adjacent stator finger support beams 5.
The rotor structure 3 has a plurality of rotor finger support beams 7.
In the embodiments shown in the figures, the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure has second spaces 8 between two adjacent rotor finger support beams 7.
In the embodiments shown in the figures, the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, stator finger support beams 5 of the stator structure 1 extend into second spaces 8 of the rotor structure 3 and rotor finger support beams 7 of the rotor structure 3 extend into first spaces 6 of the stator structure 1.
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure may have reflectional symmetry with respect to a first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure.
A stator finger support beam 5 of the stator structure 1 comprises a stator finger structure 9 along at least one side of the stator finger support beam 5. The stator finger structure 9 comprises a plurality of stator fingers 10 and stator gaps 11 between two adjacent stator fingers 10. The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure may comprise a stator finger support beam 5 of the stator structure 1 comprising a stator finger structure 9 along two opposite sides of the stator finger support beam 5, so that both stator finger structures 9 comprising a plurality of stator fingers 10 and stator gaps 11 between two adjacent stator fingers 10.
A rotor finger support beam 7 of the rotor structure 3 comprises a rotor finger structure 12 along at least one side of the rotor finger support beam 7. The rotor finger structure 12 comprises a plurality of rotor fingers 13 and rotor gaps 14 between two adjacent rotor fingers 13. The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure may comprise a rotor finger support beam 7 of the rotor structure 3 comprising a rotor finger structure 12 along two opposites side of the rotor finger support beam 7, so that both rotor finger structures 12 comprising a plurality of rotor fingers 13 and rotor gaps 14 between two adjacent rotor fingers 13.
Stator fingers 10 along the stator finger structure 9 extend into rotor gaps 14 along the rotor finger structure 12 and rotor fingers 13 along the rotor finger structure 12 extend into stator gaps 11 along the stator finger structure 9.
If the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure has reflectional symmetry with respect to a first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, the stator finger support beams 5 of the stator structure 1 and the rotor finger support beams 7 of the rotor structure 3 extend preferably, but not necessarily, perpendicularly with respect to the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, as is the situation in the embodiments shown in
The stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structures 9 of the stator finger support beams 5 of the stator structure 1 extend preferably, but not necessarily, perpendicularly from the stator finger support beams 5, and the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structures 12 of the rotor finger support beams 7 of the rotor structure 3 extend preferably, but not necessarily, perpendicularly from the rotor finger support beams 7, as is the situation in the embodiments shown in
If the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure has reflectional symmetry with respect to a first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, the stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structure 9 of the stator finger support beam 5 are preferably, but not necessarily, parallel with the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, and the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 of the rotor finger support beams 7 are preferably, but not necessarily, parallel the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure.
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure may, as in the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure shown in
If the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure is, as in the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure shown in
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure comprises preferably, but not necessarily, a rotor frame 15 surrounding the stator structure(s) 1 and the rotor structure(s) 3, as is the situation in the embodiments shown in
The rotor structure 3 is preferably, but not necessarily, movably anchored at anchoring points (not marked with a reference numeral) to the substrate 2 by means of spring structures 4; 4a, 4b provided between the rotor structure 3 and the anchoring points in such way that the rotor structure 3 can be deflected at least in a direction parallel with the plane of the substrate 2 with respect to the stator structure 1, which said direction extends preferably, but not necessarily, along a first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, so that the rotor fingertip gap D1 (see
In
The rotor structure 3 is preferably, but not necessarily, movably anchored to the substrate 2 by means of spring structures 4; 4a, 4b comprising a first spring structure 4a and a second spring structure 4b so that the first spring structure 4a and the second spring structure 4b is arranged at the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure and symmetrically with respect to the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, as is the situation in the embodiments shown in
The spring structures 4; 4a, 4b comprise preferably, but not necessarily, at least one of the following: a seesaw type spring structure, an S-shaped spring element, a U-shaped spring element, and a folded spring element.
The stator finger support beams 5 of the stator finger structure 9 are preferably, but not necessarily, vertical comb electrodes.
The rotor finger support beams 7 of the rotor finger structure 12 are preferably, but not necessarily, vertical comb electrodes.
The stator fingers 10 of the stator finger support beam(s) 5 of the stator finger structure 9 are preferably, but not necessarily, vertical comb electrodes.
The rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger support beam(s) 7 of the rotor finger structure 12 are preferably, but not necessarily, vertical comb electrodes.
The rotor finger structure 12 along said at least one side of the rotor finger support beam 7 can be designed and dimensioned in such way that the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 are evenly distributed along said at least one side of the rotor finger support beam 7 and so that the width of the rotor gaps 14 of the rotor finger structure 12 is between 4.5 and 7.5 micrometers, for example 6 micrometers, and so that the width of the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 is between 1.5 and 2.5 micrometers, for example 2 micrometers.
The rotor finger structure 12 along said at least one side of the rotor finger support beam 7 can be designed and dimensioned in such way that the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 have a uniform design and so that the length of the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 is between 4.0 and 10 micrometers, for example 6 micrometers.
The stator finger structure 9 along said at least one side of the stator finger support beam 5 can be designed and dimensioned in such way that the stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structure 9 are evenly distributed along said at least one side of the stator finger support beam 5 and so that the width of the stator gaps 11 of the stator finger structure 9 is between 4.5 and 7.5 micrometers and so that the width of the stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structure 9 is between 1.5 and 2.5 micrometers, for example 2 micrometers.
The stator finger structure 9 along said at least one side of the stator finger support beam 5 can be designed and dimensioned in such way that the stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structure 9 have a uniform design and so that the length of the stator fingers 10 of the stator finger structure 9 is between 4.0 and 10 micrometers, for example 6 micrometers.
In an unloaded position (with zero acceleration) of the micro-mechanical sensor structure, the stator fingertip gap D2 (see
In an unloaded position (with zero acceleration) of the micro-mechanical sensor structure, the rotor fingertip gap D1 (see
In an unloaded position (with zero acceleration) of the micro-mechanical sensor structure, the finger side gap D3 (see
The stator fingertip gap D2 (see
The rotor fingertip gap D1 (see
In an unloaded position (with zero acceleration) of the micro-mechanical sensor structure, the finger overlap length D4 (see
A stator finger support beam 5 of the stator structure 1 comprising a stator finger structure 9 along a side of the stator finger support beam 5 and a rotor finger support beam 7 of the rotor structure 3 comprising a rotor finger structure 12 along a side of the rotor finger support beam 7 may, as in the embodiments shown in
The width of such third spaces 17 is preferably, but not necessarily, between 5 and 10 micrometers, and being preferably about 7.5 micrometers.
The width of such third spaces 17 capacitive micromechanical sensor structure is preferably, but not necessarily, between 2 to 3 times finger side gap D3 (see
The width of the third spaces 17 capacitive micromechanical sensor structure is preferably, but not necessarily, between 2 to 3 times the distance between the rotor fingers 13 of the rotor finger structure 12 along the rotor finger support beams 7 and a stator finger support beam 5.
The comb pairs 16 may, as shown in the embodiment illustrated in
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure is preferably, but not necessarily, symmetrical with respect to a first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure and symmetrical with respect to a second central axis B of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure such that the first central axis A of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure and the second central axis B of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure are perpendicular and cuts each other at a center of mass CM of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure.
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure comprises preferably, but not necessarily, as in the embodiments shown in
The capacitive micromechanical sensor structure comprises preferably, but not necessarily, as in the embodiments shown in
Such stopper bumps 21 can for example be provided at any of the following; a rotor frame 21 of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, the stator structure 1 of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, the rotor structure 2 of the capacitive micromechanical sensor structure, and a separate stopper structure 22, as shown in
In the following a micromechanical accelerometer comprising two capacitive micromechanical sensor structures as described earlier and some preferred embodiments and variants of the micromechanical accelerometer will be described in greater detail.
The micromechanical accelerometer comprising two capacitive micromechanical sensor structures as described earlier comprises a substrate 2 having a plane (not marked with a reference numeral).
The two capacitive micromechanical sensor structures form a first micromechanical sensor 18 and a second micromechanical sensor 19 in the micromechanical accelerometer.
The first micromechanical sensor 18 is configured for measuring acceleration along an x-axis parallel to the plane of the substrate 2, and the second micromechanical sensor 19 is configured for measuring acceleration along a y-axis parallel to the plane of the substrate 2 and perpendicular to the x-axis.
The micromechanical accelerometer comprises a third central axis C. The first micromechanical sensor 18 is arranged in the micromechanical accelerometer so that the first central axis A1 of the first micromechanical sensor 18 and the third central axis C of the micromechanical accelerometer are parallel. The second micromechanical sensor 19 is arranged in the micromechanical accelerometer so that the first central axis A2 of the second micromechanical sensor 19 and the third central axis C of the micromechanical accelerometer are perpendicular.
The micromechanical accelerometer comprises preferably, but not necessarily, as in the embodiments illustrated in
It is apparent to a person skilled in the art that as technology advanced, the basic idea of the invention can be implemented in various ways. The invention and its embodiments are therefore not restricted to the above examples, but they may vary within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20135712 | Jun 2013 | FI | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6520017 | Schoefthaler | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7279761 | Acar | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20040231420 | Xie | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050092107 | Eskridge | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126287 | Malametz | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132805 | Park | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060054983 | Acar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060156819 | Robert | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060201249 | Horning | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060272414 | Ayazi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070113653 | Nasiri | May 2007 | A1 |
20070144258 | Chu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070193355 | Axelrod | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080092651 | Menard | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080190204 | Danel | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196500 | Menard | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090260437 | Blomqvist | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090320596 | Classen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050771 | Je | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100122579 | Hsu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100326191 | Foster | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110147860 | Robert | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110219876 | Kalnitsky | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140252509 | Merassi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150000403 | Liukku | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150316581 | Liukku | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2006 020 521 | Nov 2007 | DE |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, PCT/IB2014/062650, Jun. 27, 2014. |
Ibarra-Villegas et al., ‘Design of Capacitive MEMS transverse-comb accelerometers with test hardware’, Mar. 2013, Superficies y Vacío, 26(1) 4-12. |
Jason W. Weigold et al., “Design and Fabrication of Submicrometer, Single Crystal Si Accelerometer”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 2001, pp. 518-524. |
International Search Report application No. PCT/IB2014/062650 dated Oct. 7, 2014. |
Finnish Search Report dated Apr. 22, 2014 corresponding to Finnish Patent Application No. 20135712. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150316581 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |