The invention relates to the general field of magnetic disk recording with particular reference to GMR read heads having synthetic pinned layers.
The principle governing the operation of most magnetic read heads is the change of resistivity of certain materials in the presence of a magnetic field (magneto-resistance or MR). Magneto-resistance can be significantly increased by means of a structure known as a spin valve where the resistance increase (known as Giant Magneto-Resistance or GMR) derives from the fact that electrons in a magnetized solid are subject to significantly less scattering by the lattice when their own magnetization vectors (due to spin) are parallel (as opposed to anti-parallel) to the direction of magnetization of their environment.
As shown in
β is defined as 1−ρ↑/(2ρ)=ρ↓/(2ρ)−1 where ρ↑, ρ↓ are the resistivity of spin up and spin down electrons, respectively. ρ is the material resistivity (=ρ↑ρ↓/ρ↑t+ρ↓). γ is defined as 1−r↑/2rb)=r↓/(r↑+r↓) where r↑(r↓) is the interface resistance for spin up and spin down electrons; rb=(r↑r↓)/r↑+r↓). When r↑=r↓, γ will be 0 and the interface has no spin dependent scattering. Also seen in
In TABLE I we show the β and γ magnitudes for the three magnetic layers together with the resulting magnitude of their resistivity for both up and down electrons for both the parallel and antiparallel states:
The consequences of this are that the AP2 contribution to the GMR is always negative so it reduces the resistance contrast between the parallel and anti-parallel states of the free layer. This limits the GMR ratio as well as dRA (change between parallel and anti-parallel resistance) for synthetically pinned spin valves.
At this point we note that GMR devices come in two varieties. In the first type, the GMR change is measured in a direction parallel to the plane of the free layer. This is referred to as a CIP (current in plane) device. In the second type, the GMR change is measured in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the free layer. This is referred to as a CPP (current perpendicular to plane) device.
In an earlier invention (U.S. Pat. No. 6,683,762 issued Jan. 27, 2004), we disclosed a CPP device in which AP2 was made to provide a positive contribution to the GMR. This was achieved by using alloys containing chromium for AP2 and by using chromium in place of ruthenium as the AFM coupling layer.
Theoretical studies in the form of simulation were undertaken to determine whether or not the application of this approach to CIP devices would yield similar improvements. The results were disappointing in that GMR enhancements of less than about 5% were predicted by the simulations. Despite this discouraging outcome, it was decided to build a few CIP test units that used similarly modified AP2 layers. Unexpectedly, said units gave GMR improvements of the order of 15% as will be described in greater detail below. The reason for this discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental results is believed to be twofold:
(a) Various parameters, such as interface resistance and spin up/down channel resistivity used by the simulation routine, are for a particular set of growth conditions, seed layer, etc. which are different from those used in this case (b) The simulation does not take into account certain expected side effects of the present invention such as smoother Cu/free layer and Cu/AP1 interfaces as well as the improved IrMn growth associated with the presence of FeCr in AP2.
A routine search of the prior art was performed with the following reference of interest being found:
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,776, Fukuzawa et al. disclose a spin valve that includes an AP1/AP2 sub-structure.
It has been an object of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide a CIP GMR device having an improved GMR ratio.
Another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been that the pinned layer of said CIP device be synthetically pinned.
A further object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been that said CIP device have a performance that is at least as good as that of one having a directly pinned layer while continuing to enjoy the stability associated with a synthetically pinned layer.
Still another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been to provide a process for manufacturing said CIP device.
These objects have been achieved by modifying the composition of AP2. Said modification comprises the addition of chromium or vanadium to AP2, while still retaining its ferromagnetic properties. Examples of alloys suitable for use in AP2 include FeCr, NiFeCr, NiCr, CoCr, CoFeCr, and CoFeV. The ruthenium layer normally used to effect antiferromagnetic coupling between AP1 and AP2 is retained.
The basic novel feature of the invention is the use of chrome containing magnetic alloys, such as FeCr, as the material for AP2. The resulting negative β, enables the AP2 resistance contribution to have the same sign as AP1, which is equivalent to an increase of the AP1 thickness which in turn leads to an enhancement of the CIP GMR.
We will now describe the process(es) for manufacturing the present invention. In the course of this description the structure(s) of the invention will also become clear.
Referring now to
Now follows a crucial step. AP2 layer 23, that is a magnetic alloy which includes chromium, is deposited onto AFM coupling layer 14. The process then concludes with the deposition of pinning layer 12 onto AP2 layer 23 followed by the deposition of capping layer 18 onto pinning layer 12.
For layer 23 we have tended to prefer FeCr but this is by no means the only possible choice for AP2. For example, as illustrated in
Other possible materials for AP2 that could be used in place of, or in combination with, FeCr include NiFeCr, NiCr, CoCr, CoFeCr, CoFeV, and FeV. Note, too, that the general approach to AP2 outlined above is applicable to both top spin valves (
An example of two such experimental film configurations with varying FeCr (inverted GMR) of various thicknesses (in Angstroms) as wafers 03 and 05, together with a reference configuration, wafer-01
Table III below summarizes the CIP GMR properties of the three structures detailed above:
These results show the effect of the inverted GMR. When there is FeCr in AP2, the CIP GMR is increased from 12.3% to 13.7 and 14.6% for the two examples shown. The DR value has also increased significantly. Hpin, the pinning strength, which is an important property for synthetically pinned films, can also be seen to have improved. Other results (not shown) have demonstrated that this type of AP2 design leads to improvements in bottom spin valves as well as in (the upper part of) dual spin valves.
As already discussed above, in addition to FeCr there are other materials such as NiFeCr, NiCr, CoCr, CoFeCr, CoFeV, FeV, etc. which can be used to obtain similar effects.
This application is related to docket number FP03-0320-00, filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, and filed on Jun. 18, 2004.