Patent Grant
9013672
The present invention relates to a lithographic apparatus and a method for cleaning a lithographic apparatus.
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the IC. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in the lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system and also increasing the depth of focus.) Other immersion liquids have been proposed, including water with solid particles (e.g. quartz) suspended therein.
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate using a liquid confinement system (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application publication no. WO 99/49504. As illustrated in
A further immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system is shown in
In European patent application publication no. EP 1420300 and United States patent application publication no. US 2004-0136494, each of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, the idea of a twin or dual stage immersion lithography apparatus is disclosed. Such an apparatus is provided with two tables for supporting a substrate. Leveling measurements are carried out with a table at a first position, without immersion liquid, and exposure is carried out with a table at a second position, where immersion liquid is present. Alternatively, the apparatus has only one table.
Immersion liquid may lift debris or particles (e.g. left over from the manufacturing process) from parts of the lithographic apparatus and/or substrates or erode components so as to introduce particles. This debris may then be left behind on the substrate after imaging or may interfere with the imaging while in suspension in the liquid between the projection system and the substrate. Thus, the issue of contamination should be addressed in an immersion lithographic apparatus.
It is desirable, for example, to provide a lithographic apparatus which can easily and effectively be cleaned as well as to provide a method for effectively cleaning an immersion lithographic apparatus.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an apparatus to clean an immersion lithographic projection apparatus, comprising: a megasonic transducer configured to clean a surface of the immersion lithographic apparatus; a liquid supply system constructed and arranged to supply liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned; and a cleaning liquid outlet configured to accommodate a cleaning fluid outflow.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an immersion lithographic projection apparatus, comprising: a substrate table constructed and arranged to hold a substrate; a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate; a megasonic transducer configured to clean a surface; a liquid supply system constructed and arranged to supply liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned; and a cleaning fluid outlet configured to allow an outflow of cleaning fluid.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning a surface of an immersion lithographic projection apparatus using megasonic waves emanating from a megasonic transducer, comprising: covering the surface to be cleaned and a surface of the megasonic transducer in liquid; introducing megasonic waves into the liquid; and extracting liquid through a liquid outlet that adjoins the surface to be cleaned.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a cleaning device to clean a surface of a component of a lithographic projection apparatus, the cleaning device comprising: a liquid flow inducing device configured to create a flow of liquid adjacent the surface; and a sonic transducer configured to emit sonic waves through the liquid onto the surface.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus, comprising: a substrate table constructed and arranged to hold a substrate; a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate; and a cleaning device to clean a surface of a component of the lithographic projection apparatus, the cleaning device comprising a liquid flow inducing device configured to create a flow of liquid adjacent the surface, and a sonic transducer configured to emit sonic waves through the liquid onto the surface.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning a surface of a component of a lithographic projection apparatus, the method comprising: providing a liquid on the surface; inducing a flow in the liquid; and providing sonic waves through the liquid.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning a surface of an object of a lithographic apparatus, the method comprising: providing a liquid including a first additive between the surface to be cleaned and a sonic transducer; emitting sonic waves from the transducer onto the surface; providing a liquid including a second additive, different to the first additive, between the surface to be cleaned and the sonic transducer; and emitting sonic waves from the transducer onto the surface.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising: a sonic transducer with a face facing, in use, a surface to be cleaned; a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid between the sonic transducer and a surface to be cleaned; and an extractor configured to remove liquid from between the sonic transducer and the surface, an inlet of the extractor positioned such that, in use, a radially inward flow of liquid between the transducer and the surface substantially towards a center of the face of the transducer is formed.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
an illumination system (illuminator) IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g. UV radiation or DUV radiation);
a support structure (e.g. a mask table) MT constructed to support a patterning device (e.g. a mask) MA and connected to a first positioner PM configured to accurately position the patterning device in accordance with certain parameters;
a substrate table (e.g. a wafer table) WT constructed to hold a substrate (e.g. a resist-coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioner PW configured to accurately position the substrate in accordance with certain parameters; and
a projection system (e.g. a refractive projection lens system) PS configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MA onto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.
The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
The support structure holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables and/or support structures may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables and/or support structures while one or more other tables and/or support structures are being used for exposure.
Referring to
The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as R-outer and winner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
The radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA, which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table) MT, and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes:
1. In step mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PS. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes a programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
Another immersion lithography solution IH with a localized liquid supply system solution which has been proposed is to provide the liquid supply system with a barrier member that extends along at least a part of a boundary of the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate table. Such a solution is illustrated in
The barrier member 12 at least partly contains liquid in the space 11 between a final element of the projection system PS and the substrate W. A contactless seal 16 to the substrate may be formed around the image field of the projection system so that liquid is confined within the space between the substrate surface and the final element of the projection system. The space is at least partly bounded or formed by the barrier member 12 positioned below and surrounding the final element of the projection system PS. Liquid is brought into the space below the projection system and within the barrier member 12 by liquid inlet 13 and may be removed by liquid outlet 13. The barrier member 12 may extend a little above the final element of the projection system and the liquid level rises above the final element so that a buffer of liquid is provided. The barrier member 12 has an inner periphery that at the upper end, in an embodiment, closely conforms to the shape of the projection system or the final element thereof and may, e.g., be round. At the bottom, the inner periphery closely conforms to the shape of the image field, e.g., rectangular though this need not be the case.
The liquid is contained in the space 11 by a gas seal 16 which, during use, is formed between the bottom of the barrier member 12 and the surface of the substrate W. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air or synthetic air but, in an embodiment, N2 or another inert gas, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between barrier member 12 and substrate and extracted via outlet 14. The overpressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level on the outlet 14 and geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwardly that confines the liquid. Those inlets/outlets may be annular grooves which surround the space 11 and the flow of gas 16 is effective to contain the liquid in the space 11. Such a system is disclosed in United States patent application publication no. US 2004-0207824.
As noted above, an immersion lithographic apparatus is one in which a substrate is imaged through liquid. That is, an immersion liquid is provided between a final element of the projection system PS and the substrate. This arrangement may pose one or more particular problems. In particular, the liquid should be confined in the apparatus and also the liquid should be kept as free as possible of foreign object particles which may cause defects during imaging and/or by being left on the substrate surface after imaging and prior to downstream processing. Sometimes the immersion liquid includes particles in suspension deliberately.
One way of addressing the problem of foreign object particles is by applying a cleaning liquid to the surface to be cleaned and/or introducing sonic (ultra or megasonic) waves into the liquid to clean the surface. The cleaning liquid may or may not be the same as the immersion liquid. It could, for example, be ultra pure water.
Compared to ultrasonic waves, megasonic waves produce cavitation bubbles (which implode or vibrate) which are very small and therefore may go very close to the surface to be cleaned. However, there is a limit to the amount of energy which may be introduced into the liquid using megasonics. Generally whereas ultrasonic energy may be introduced into a liquid anywhere and will be distributed throughout the liquid, megasonic energy is only locally high and must therefore be directed directly to the surface to be cleaned. That is, a direct path (line of sight/straight) must be present between the transducer introducing the megasonic waves and the surface to be cleaned. The whole length of that path should be filled with liquid.
Megasonic frequencies are generally regarded to be between 750 kHz to 3 MHz. For the present purposes frequencies of above about 750 kHz, above 1 MHz or above 1.5 MHz are used.
A stagnant boundary layer in the cleaning fluid near the surface of an object to be cleaned becomes thinner as the frequency of the introduced sonic energy is increased. At megasonic frequencies cleaning is partly accomplished by megasonic pulsing and acoustic streaming with high velocity pressure waves in the cleaning fluid as well as bubble vibration and, to a lesser extent cavitation and bubble bursting.
At megasonic frequencies, particles of less than 0.5 μm in diameter may be removed without damage to the surface being cleaned. As mentioned above, there should be a clear path from the transducer to the surface being cleaned (line of sight). In order to further increase the cleaning efficiency, gas may be dissolved into the liquid to promote cavitation (bubble formation). Suitable gases include nitrogen, carbon dioxide or oxygen and mixtures of those gases (including air) but other gases may also be suitable such as ozone, or hydrogen (containing water). The use of a surfactant in the liquid can further enhance cleaning efficiency. Other possibilities to enhance cleaning efficiency include using a detergent or a solvent in the cleaning liquid or adding H2O2 solution. This boosts the oxidizing nature of the fluid, thereby helping to remove organic contamination. Another example is hypochlorite.
It is also possible to change the cleaning fluid polarity for example by adding a liquid-miscible solvent (e.g., a water-miscible solvent) with a lower polarity than the liquid (e.g., water), examples of which, include an alcohol, a ketone, an organic acid, an amine, etc. One potential problem with adding such an additive is the lower flash point of the resulting cleaning fluid. Thus, adding an organic-based additive with a high flash point in order to vary the cleaning fluid characteristics without causing a flammability hazard is desired. Such an additive may include N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), glycol ether, etc. Of course other additives may be added to the liquid. For example, it may be desirable to add a chemical which has a specific chemical attack on one or more specific contaminants which are to be removed. For example, resist particles could be removed with a chemical such as methylethylkeytone, ethylacetate and/or acetone.
In one embodiment of the present invention, cleaning of a surface is performed in a multi-step way in which different contaminants are removed during different steps. Thus, in a first step, a liquid with a first specific additive is used to remove a first contaminant. Then the sonic waves are used to clean the surface through the liquid with the first specific additive. In a second step, a liquid with a second additive, different from the first additive, and designed to attack a different contaminant is used between the sonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned. Any number of these steps can be performed and it may or may not be necessary to rinse the surface between using liquids with different additives (for example, the first and second additives, which are different, may not be compatible). Such a sequential cleaning strategy can result in high overall particle removal.
Objects which one might want to clean in an immersion lithographic apparatus include, but are not limited to, one or more parts of a substrate table WT which supports the substrate W (its top surface), a final element of the projection system PS which is immersed in immersion liquid during imaging, and/or a liquid confinement system (for example those illustrated in
In an embodiment, a liquid supply system provides liquid between a sonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned. In the embodiment, the liquid supply system provides a flow of liquid so that liquid is removed as the surface is cleaned such that particles removed from the surface are carried away. One suitable liquid is water in an ultra pure form. However, other types of liquid may be suitable. Furthermore, an addition to the liquid such as a surfactant as mentioned above may also have an advantage. Other cleaning liquids include water/hydrogen peroxide, water/ethanol, water/iso-propylalcohol (IPA), water/ammonia or water/acetone mixtures, for example. Other chemicals which may be useful as an addition include tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) and SC-1 or SC-2.
One reason for introducing gas (or some solvents) into the liquid is that this promotes stable cavitation. This results in stable bubbles being formed in the liquid. These bubbles are then vibrated by the megasonic waves which results in cleaning which is likely to do less damage to the surface being cleaned than so called transient cavitation which is cavitation where a solvent evaporates into a bubble and then implodes or collapses. These violent implosions may lead to damage of the surface and are typically seen at ultrasonic frequencies and are less significant at megasonic frequencies where the bubbles produced tend to be smaller than those produced at ultrasonic frequencies. However, as noted above, the megasonic waves should be supplied in line of sight of the surface they are to clean.
A process time up to 100 seconds may lead to a particle removal efficiency of up to 100% at a frequency of about 1 MHz. If the acoustic frequency exceeds much more than 3 MHz the particle removal efficiency may be dramatically decreased compared to a frequency of just above 1 MHz. The introduction of gas into the liquid has a major effect on the particle removal efficiency. Removal of 34 nm diameter SiO2 particles may increase from zero removal efficiency to 30% removal efficiency with the introduction of oxygen at a level of 20 ppm into the liquid. Thus, a gas concentration of above about 5 ppm can be useful.
Temperature may also be significant and a balance should be drawn between faster reaction time at a high temperature (e.g., 55° C.) over less gas being dissolved at a high temperature.
There is also an effect of the pH of the liquid. At low pH, there are many H+ ions in the liquid which results in a positive surface charge. Similarly, at high pH, the liquid contains many OH− ions which results in a negative surface charge. Therefore ensuring that the pH of the liquid is distant from pH 7 increases the likelihood that re-deposition of particles after they have been removed does not occur. Moreover, the electrostatic repulsion between the particle and the surface when both are charged equally (either positively or negatively) assists in lifting the particle from the surface.
The power of the transducer is desirably between 0.2 and 5 W/cm2, the irradiation distance between 5 and 20 mm and cleaning time between 10 and 90 seconds. For the acoustic waves from the megasonic transducer to travel a direct path to the surface to be cleaned from the megasonic transducer, several designs are proposed to clean different parts of the immersion lithographic apparatus.
A megasonic cleaner is well suited to removing particles from a surface.
When the top surface of the substrate table WT is cleaned, it is also possible to clean at the same time one or more sensors provided on the top surface of the substrate table WT. Examples of types of sensors include a transmission image sensor, a lens interferometer, and/or a spot sensor.
It may be useful to ensure that the acoustic waves produced by the transducer impinge at 90° onto the surface to be cleaned. For this purpose, a micrometer may be provided to adjust the tilt of the transducer 20 relative to the surface to be cleaned. In one design of apparatus, it may be advantageous to provide the transducer tilted relative to the surface and again, this can be adjusted using a micrometer. A micrometer may also be used to adjust the distance from the transducer to the surface to be cleaned.
The issue of contamination in an immersion lithographic apparatus is, for example, addressed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/437,876 filed May 22, 2006. In this application, a lithographic apparatus has a megasonic transducer configured to clean a surface easily and effectively. The megasonic transducer is well suited to removing particles from a surface. However, the particles may sometimes re-deposit and re-attach themselves to the surface being cleaned. Re-deposition readily occurs if the fluid flow is not accurately controlled which happens typically at one or more locations of zero flow velocity (stagnant zone) or at the interface of fluid and gas (e.g., air). Therefore, it is desirable to provide a flow of liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface being cleaned. In particular, it is desirable to design the apparatus such that there are no locations of zero flow velocity (stagnant zones).
It is desirable to alleviate the aforementioned problem of particles re-attaching themselves by, for example, providing a lithographic apparatus in which the flow of cleaning fluid is effectively controlled so as to minimize the re-deposition of contaminant particles on a surface being cleaned. It is also desirable to provide a flow of liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface being cleaned, so that the liquid in which the particles are suspended is quickly moved away. Thus the number of locations of zero flow velocity (stagnant zones) is reduced and re-deposition is avoided.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an apparatus for cleaning an immersion lithographic projection apparatus, comprising: a megasonic transducer configured to clean a surface of the immersion lithographic apparatus; a liquid supply system constructed and arranged to supply liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned; and a cleaning liquid outlet configured to accommodate a cleaning fluid outflow. The cleaning liquid outlet adjoins the surface to be cleaned. A surface of the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned are immersed in cleaning liquid for cleaning.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an immersion lithographic projection apparatus, comprising: a substrate table constructed and arranged to hold a substrate; a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate; a megasonic transducer configured to clean a surface; a liquid supply system constructed and arranged to supply liquid between the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned; and a cleaning fluid outlet configured to allow an outflow of cleaning fluid. The cleaning fluid outlet adjoins the surface to be cleaned. A surface of the megasonic transducer and the surface to be cleaned are immersed during cleaning in cleaning liquid.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning a surface of an immersion lithographic projection apparatus using megasonic waves emanating from a megasonic transducer, comprising: covering the surface to be cleaned and a surface of the megasonic transducer in liquid; introducing megasonic waves into the liquid; and extracting liquid through a liquid outlet that adjoins the surface to be cleaned.
In a variation of the apparatus shown in
The gas/liquid (e.g. air/water) interface is especially sensitive to particle (re)deposition. As the megasonic transducer 20 is moved across the surface of the substrate table WT (and/or vice versa), the gas/liquid interface passes over critical, cleaned areas. Contaminants, some of which have been removed from the substrate table WT, can deposit on the substrate table WT surface under the gas/liquid interface, between the surface being cleaned and the one or more outlets.
It is advantageous to have a flow 35 of liquid between the surface being cleaned and the surface of the sonic transducer 20 facing the surface to be cleaned. In particular, the movement of liquid 30 is desirably towards an area of higher concentration of particles and towards an area still being irradiated with sonic waves. This arrangement may be particularly desirable in a situation where there is a liquid/air interface. This is because contaminant particles which have been removed from the surface do not migrate towards a liquid/air interface so that the cleaning is improved. In the embodiment of
The transducer 20 has a substantially central extraction pipe 100, with an outlet 10 defined in its undersurface. The outlet 10 adjoins, is adjacent to or is next to the area A being cleaned. The other end of the pipe 100 is connected to, for example, a wet vacuum i.e. an extractor. The liquid is sucked upwards through the outlet 10, causing the cleaning liquid to flow under the transducer 20, toward the center of the megasonic transducer 20. Thus, the contaminants released from the surface of the substrate table WT are removed with the flow of liquid 30, before they can redeposit back onto the surface of the top surface of the substrate table WT that is being cleaned.
As megasonic waves are directional, cleaning is desirably localized or compartmentalized to the surface of the substrate table directly in the line of path of the megasonic waves. In the apparatus shown in
In the arrangement shown in
In the apparatus of
Although illustrated in
What is desirable is the inward flow 35 of liquid from an area of low concentration of contaminant particles towards an area of high concentration of particles. An area of low concentration of particles includes an area radially outwardly from the central axis of the sonic transducer 20 where the sonic waves are not detaching particles from the surface A being cleaned. An area of high concentration of particles includes an area such as between the sonic transducer 20 and the surface A being cleaned. In this way clean liquid is replenishing contaminated liquid rather than the other way around. Furthermore, particles which have been removed from the surface to be cleaned may reattach themselves. With a radially inward flow, such particles will reattach themselves in a position radially inwardly of where they were originally attached. Geometrically the position of re-attachment should therefore be under the transducer 20 i.e. in an area where they can be again removed by the sonic waves from the sonic transducer 20.
What is desirable is the generation of the inward flow and not how this is achieved. One or more particular embodiments have been described above though of course the skilled person would be aware that other arrangements are possible and that the tube 100 does not necessarily need to pass directly through the center of the megasonic transducer 20 or a plurality of megasonic transducers forming the overall transducer 20. For example, a tube could pass through the liquid 30 to a position at which it is desired to extract liquid thereby to induce the inward flow.
The substrate table WT and/or transducer 20 are moved relative to one another so that all of the top surface of the substrate table WT may be cleaned. The cleaning could take place within the lithographic apparatus in an automated way or could be carried out manually by moving the transducer 20 relative to the top surface of the substrate table WT (and/or vice versa) by hand or by some tooling.
If the cleaning process is automated, one way of arranging for this is to have the transducer 20 be moveable from a stationary storage position to a (stationary) cleaning position and to move the substrate table WT relative to the transducer 20 when the transducer is in the (stationary) cleaning position. The substrate table WT may need to be moved in the Z axis prior to activation of the liquid supply system of the cleaning device. Once the gas flow 16 has been created the barrier member 12 is supplied with liquid and the substrate table WT is moved in the X-Y plane so that the surface which is desired to be cleaned can be cleaned.
A flow of liquid across the distance between the transducer and the surface to be cleaned is desirable though not essential.
Another way to prevent or at least reduce re-attachment of the particles to the surface is to change one or more properties of the liquid between the transducer and the surface to ensure that the zeta potential of the particles and the zeta potential of the surface is such that the particles are not attracted to the surface, desirably such that they are repelled from the surface.
The zeta potential is the potential of a surface in a liquid. The zeta potential generally decreases with distance from the surface. A given type of material has a given zeta potential for a particular type of liquid. One way of varying the zeta potential of a surface is to change the concentration of electrolyte in the liquid and an alternative or further method to change the zeta potential is to change the pH of the liquid. By careful selection of the concentration of electrolyte in the liquid (e.g. salt) and/or the pH of the liquid, (i) the zeta potential of the surface from which the particles are removed (and/or any other surface where adherence is to be avoided) and (ii) the zeta potential of the particles can be chosen. Desirably those two zeta potentials may be chosen such that they have the same polarity and thus each or one of the objects that has a respective zeta potential may repel from the other.
The pH of the liquid and/or concentration of the electrolyte can be chosen with a knowledge of the material of which the surface which is being cleaned is made and with a knowledge of the type of material of which the particles are likely to be made. If the materials are the same, then it should be easy to select a pH and/or electrolyte concentration at which the zeta potential is non-zero for both the surface and the particle. In that circumstance the potential would be either positive or negative for both the surface and the particle such that they would repel one another and the particles would be unlikely to re-adhere to the surface. If the materials are different, pH and/or electrolyte concentration may be harder to choose, but it is likely that there will be at least one pH and/or electrolyte concentration at which the zeta potential will have the same polarity for both materials.
Changing the pH of the liquid may have a negative impact on the solubility of materials, which can itself result in contamination or loss of material integrity. If this is deemed a problem it may be desirable to change the electrolyte concentration rather than the pH. If this is done by adding a well chosen salt (e.g. NaCl) then this may not greatly affect the pH of the liquid (i.e. the liquid remains neutral).
The use of two or more of the above techniques in combination (in particular changing pH and/or electrolyte concentration to change zeta potentials and the use of a surfactant) may be the best approach.
A problem encountered in cleaning a liquid confinement system LCS, such as an immersion hood (see e.g.
In an embodiment, a shield, desirably comprising a plate, may be used to shield the final element of the projection system from megasonic waves and/or liquid. Desirably the shield is a solid barrier 310 between the transducer 20 and the part of the projection system PS which is exposed through the aperture 200. In an embodiment, the shield is a physical presence (barrier) in all straight paths from the transducer 20 to the aperture 200. The barrier and/or gas gap 75 (which the barrier helps to maintain) are effective to reflect sonic vibrations from the transducer 20 away from the aperture 200. In an embodiment, the barrier 310 also seals the aperture 200 so that no liquid enters the aperture 200. This helps ensure the integrity of the gas gap and that no liquid contacts the surface of the optical element.
The cleaning apparatus has a shield that in addition to a gas gap 75 between the top surface of the reservoir and the optical element comprises a barrier 310 that forms a solid separator between the transducer 20 and the gap 75. The barrier 310 improves the effectiveness of the shield by reflecting megasonic waves away from the optical element. The barrier 310 is in the form to act functionally as an umbrella to the optical element, i.e. to shield the optical element from liquid. The umbrella covers an aperture 200 defined by an inner rim 318 formed in the liquid confinement system LCS around the aperture 200 and is secured to the liquid confinement system LCS by an inner sealing 500, typically an O-ring, between the barrier 310 (umbrella) and the liquid confinement system LCS. The inner sealing 500 prevents cleaning liquid from entering the gap 75 to compromise the performance of the gap 75.
The cleaning tool also comprises a tube 320 which is attached to the barrier 310. The tube passes through the tool body 300. The tube has an inlet 330 to supply cleaning liquid into the reservoir. The inlet is located near or adjacent the top of the cleaning liquid reservoir, near the inner rim 318 formed in the liquid confinement system LCS. The inlet 330 is provided as a single slit or as a plurality of discrete holes around the outer edge of the barrier 310 such that a flow of liquid is provided in all radial directions. Formed in the undersurface of the liquid confinement system LCS is an outlet 10 connected to an under pressure source (e.g., a wet vacuum) to remove cleaning fluid. The outlet 10 adjoins, is adjacent to, or is next to, the surface of the liquid confinement system LCS to be cleaned and is a feature already present on conventional liquid confinement system (e.g., outlet OUT in any of
The cleaning tool may be implemented an in-line or off-line arrangement. If implemented in an off-line arrangement, the liquid confinement system LCS may be removed from the lithographic apparatus for fitment to the cleaning tool.
The apparatus shown in
The seal 500 between the tool and the liquid confinement system LCS may deteriorate, allowing liquid to leak into the gap 75. Once cleaning liquid contacts the optical element, the optical element may absorb megasonic waves and may heat-up. Mechanical damage by the megasonic energy may be an issue. For these reasons the performance of the gas gap as an insulating shield of temperature and of megasonic waves may be compromised.
A further or alternative problem with the inner seal 500 is that the design of the cleaning tool is defined by the size of the barrier 310 (umbrella) required for the inner seal 500 to function. The cleaning tool may not be generic and so different designs of cleaning tool may be required for different designs of liquid confinement system LCS. Also, there may be one or more apertures in a liquid confinement system LCS open to the underside of the liquid confinement system LCS and also in fluid communication with the aperture 200. It is possible for liquid to migrate through these one or more apertures through the liquid confinement system LCS into the gap 75. Once there, there may be no way in which to remove that liquid in the embodiment of
Although the addition of an additive (e.g. a surfactant and/or detergent) to the cleaning liquid, such as ultra-pure water, may improve the cleaning, the additive may cause a problem. In a wet vacuum system, the cleaning liquid is agitated which may cause the cleaning liquid to foam. Foaming is a problem because certain components of the lithographic apparatus, such as sensors, can be damaged on contact with foam. The foam may cause the lithographic apparatus to malfunction or cause further problems for the fabrication environment. The problem may be enhanced by the use of a re-cycling loop in the wet vacuum generator. If a lower pressure is used than that provided by the wet vacuum, this allows pressure within the reservoir to build-up such that the leaking of liquid through one or more apertures into the gap 75 mentioned above may be more likely to occur.
Shown in
The barrier 310 serves as an umbrella and is funnel-shaped (or in other words a truncated cone shape in the reservoir). This shape together with the other features of this cleaning tool may improve the effectiveness of the insulating shield in that, in use, megasonic waves are reflected away from the optical element at a different angle to the angle at which they impinge on the shield. The liquid 30 flows over the rim 317 of the barrier 310 and down, into the outlet 10 and into an outflow tube 320, under the influence of gravity. Thus, the barrier 310 provides an outlet 10 through which liquid exits the reservoir under gravity. Thus, the system can be seen as being an open system (compared with the embodiment of
The rim 317 can be provided with a cross-sectional variation or shape that complements inner rim 318 of the liquid confinement system LCS, so that the flow path of cleaning liquid 30 out of the reservoir is curved or otherwise changes direction (i.e. is not straight) as it passes through the space that separates the rim 317 from the inner rim 318. See
The flow of liquid may be assisted by a ‘slow’ pump 325 (connected to the outlet 10) that provides a small under-pressure to avoid the generation of bubbles in the liquid. A typical flow rate is between 0.5 and 3 liters/minute. In an embodiment, the liquid flow does not pass through a wet vacuum. Between the funnel-shaped barrier 310 and the slow pump may be a restriction 328 (i.e. a flow restrictor), desirably, in the outflow tube 320. The restriction helps minimize the formation of foam.
In an embodiment, the pressure used to cause liquid to flow through the cleaning tool is always the same. The pressure is determined by the difference in height between the rim 317 of the funnel-shaped barrier 310 and an inlet to supply cleaning liquid 30 into the reservoir. In an embodiment, the cleaning apparatus is a stable system because the pressure required to operate the cleaning apparatus is automatically controlled. Thus, the risk of flooding the gap 75 is reduced so that the gap 75 is more stable. The tool may provide an effective insulating shield for the optical element from temperature variation and/or megasonic waves.
A feature that provides improved safety and further control is a tube 340 that can be provided parallel to the funnel-shaped barrier 310 and in fluid communication with the reservoir which can be used as an indicator. The level of liquid in the tube 340 is the same as the level of liquid in the reservoir and therefore a judgment can be made as to whether the gas gap 75 is large enough. The indicator can show if there is a blockage in the tube in the barrier 310 that could cause the gas gap 75 to flood with cleaning fluid 30.
An advantage of the consistent pressure in the tool may be to reduce the quantity of bubbles formed within the reservoir. The effectiveness of the megasonic transducer may increase as a result.
As the cleaning liquid flows smoothly through the cleaning tool, there may be less gas/cleaning liquid contact than in known wet vacuum systems. Therefore, foaming within the cleaning tool may be reduced. This enables an additive (surfactant and/or detergent) to be added to the cleaning fluid that would normally foam excessively and so may usually be prohibited from use.
Note that, in an embodiment, the system is open instead of closed. Therefore, there is no need for an inner seal (there is still an outer seal). This may provide an advantage. In the
The cleaning tool shown in
Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the idea of draining cleaning liquid away from a reservoir in a cleaning tool under gravity in order to avoid foaming can be used in any type of cleaning tool and not just the type illustrated in
Attaching the megasonic cleaning tool to the liquid confinement system LCS and activating the transducer 20 will induce vibrations (e.g., in the MHz range) to the portion to be cleaned. Vibrations in this range may cause bubble cavitation, megasonic pulsing, and acoustic streaming, which together can be the basis for megasonic cleaning. Notably, the supply of cleaning liquid 30 is provided in such a way that the optical element is protected against megasonic energy and the cleaning fluid is introduced in such a way that negative effects (like bubbles, particle re-deposition, and/or foaming) in the apparatus are avoided.
The exemplary fluid supply configurations may improve product yield, for example, by improving the cleanliness of the lithographic apparatus which, in turn, contributes to reduction in defectivity levels.
All embodiments may be implemented off-line. There may be in-line implementations of the embodiments.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive and reflective optical components. Thus, a lens is an optical element and in an embodiment, the optical element is a lens.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein. The invention can be performed under the control of a controller, perhaps programmed by the above mentioned computer program.
One or more embodiments of the invention may be applied to any immersion lithography apparatus, in particular, but not exclusively, those types mentioned above and whether the immersion liquid is provided in the form of a bath or only on a localized surface area of the substrate. A liquid supply system as contemplated herein should be broadly construed. In certain embodiments, it may be a mechanism or combination of structures that provides a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate and/or substrate table. It may comprise a combination of one or more structures, one or more liquid inlets, one or more gas inlets, one or more gas outlets, and/or one or more liquid outlets that provide liquid to the space. In an embodiment, a surface of the space may be a portion of the substrate and/or substrate table, or a surface of the space may completely cover a surface of the substrate and/or substrate table, or the space may envelop the substrate and/or substrate table. The liquid supply system may optionally further include one or more elements to control the position, quantity, quality, shape, flow rate or any other features of the liquid.
The immersion liquid used in the apparatus may have different compositions, according to the desired properties and the wavelength of exposure radiation used. For an exposure wavelength of 193 nm, ultra pure water or water-based compositions may be used and for this reason the immersion liquid is sometimes referred to as water and water-related terms such as hydrophilic, hydrophobic, humidity, etc. may be used.
The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the claims set out below.
This application claims priority and benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/924,244, entitled “Lithographic Apparatus and Lithographic Apparatus Cleaning Method”, filed on May 4, 2007. The content of that application is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
| 4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4405701 | Banks et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 5039349 | Schoeppel | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
| 6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6230722 | Mitsumori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6297871 | Hagiwara | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6496257 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6649093 | Van Santen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6781670 | Krautschik | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6878916 | Schuster | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6897941 | Almogy | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6954256 | Flagello et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6992750 | Kawashima et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7009682 | Bleeker | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014966 | Pawloski et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7050146 | Duineveld et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053983 | Tokita | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7061575 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7070915 | Ho et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075616 | Derksen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081943 | Lof et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7088422 | Hakey et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7091502 | Gau et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7116395 | Nakamura | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119874 | Cox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7145635 | Kawashima | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7180574 | Kitaoka | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7195860 | Endo et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7199858 | Lof et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215410 | Sumiyoshi | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221431 | Ohsaki | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224427 | Chang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224434 | Tokita | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227615 | Tokita | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7242455 | Nei et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7256868 | Akamatsu | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7274472 | Bischoff | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7301606 | Arai | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7307263 | Bakker et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315033 | Pawloski et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7317504 | De Smit et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7321415 | Hazelton et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7345737 | Miyajima | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349064 | Nakano | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7352434 | Streefkerk et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7365828 | Takamura | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7379162 | Miyajima | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7385670 | Compen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7405417 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7411653 | Hoogendam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7462850 | Banine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7522259 | Hazelton et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528930 | Tokita | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7589818 | Mulkens et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7684008 | De Smit et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7738074 | Streefkerk et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7841352 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7866330 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7880860 | Jansen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7900641 | De Jong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 20010019399 | Hagiwara | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020104454 | Verschueren | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20040060573 | Woods | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028314 | Hickman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034744 | Sohn | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068499 | Dodoc et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094115 | Taniguchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106512 | Endo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155623 | Kume | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050175776 | Streefkerk et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205108 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225734 | De Smit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225737 | Weissenrieder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250054 | Chang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264774 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270505 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274898 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023185 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060027248 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028626 | Chang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028628 | Lin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028632 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033892 | Cadee et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050256 | Takamura | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050351 | Higashiki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103813 | Niwa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103816 | Belfroid et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103818 | Holmes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132731 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232757 | Tani et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250588 | Brandl | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256316 | Tanno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002296 | Chang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026345 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064215 | Dirksen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076197 | Koga | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070085989 | Nagahashi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091287 | Chang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127001 | Van Der Hoeven | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070132969 | Gellrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146657 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146658 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070159610 | Shiraishi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171390 | Hazelton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172234 | Shigemori et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206279 | Brueck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229789 | Kawamura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247600 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247601 | Hazelton et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251543 | Singh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253710 | Kaneyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258072 | Nagasaka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274711 | Kaneyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285631 | Stavenga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080002162 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080002164 | Chang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080013064 | Nishii | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018867 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080218712 | Compen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271747 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271750 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284990 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015804 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090015805 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090025753 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090027635 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090027636 | Leenders et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20110128516 | Kaneko et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1963673 | May 2007 | CN |
| 206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
| 221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
| 224 448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
| 242 880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
| 103 18 238 | Nov 2004 | DE |
| 0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
| 0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1 420 300 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1 420 300 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1 821 337 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
| 58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
| 62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
| 62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
| 07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
| 07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| 10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 11-162831 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000-323396 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2001-087725 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005-072404 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005-079222 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005-347761 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006-032750 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006-063201 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006-134999 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2006-179909 | Jul 2006 | JP |
| 2006-210408 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2006-523031 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2006-310706 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2007-029973 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-088328 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| 2007-142217 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007-150102 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007-227543 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2007-227580 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO2004105107 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005015315 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005119742 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005122218 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006041086 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006062065 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006062065 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006122578 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007006447 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007135990 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007136089 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008001871 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2009128554 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando Jan. 2001, Dec. 17, 2001. |
| M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
| M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
| B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
| B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
| B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
| G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
| S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003 |
| S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
| Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003. |
| H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
| J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
| B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
| H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2 μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
| G. Owen et al., “⅛μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
| H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
| S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
| S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho. Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
| H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
| T. Matsuyama et a., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
| “Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
| A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
| B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010 in related Japanese patent application No. 2008-120668. |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010 in related Japanese patent application No. 2008-120654. |
| U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,479. |
| U.S. Office Action mailed Aug. 2, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,979. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,479. |
| Machine Translation of DE 103 18 238, published Nov. 25, 2004. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,979. |
| Japanese Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Jun. 5, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-093700. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2012 in corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 101110471. |
| Japanese Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Jul. 3, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-134129. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/081,169. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 9, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/081,169. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080273181 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60924244 | May 2007 | US |
