The manufacture of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices is generally well-known, and there are numerous devices used in different applications and numerous methods of making those devices. An example of a method of manufacturing a MEMS device is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,710 titled “METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MICROELECTROMECHANICAL COMBDRIVE DEVICE” TO Scalf et al., herein incorporated by reference. An example of a MEMS device is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,705,166 titled “SMALL SIZE, HIGH CAPACITANCE READOUT SILICON BASED MEMS ACCELEROMETER” to Leonardson, herein incorporated by reference.
The Leonardson accelerometer provides an inexpensive force measurement device having high pick-off sensitivity in a high-G input range which can operate in a high-G shock environment by providing a capacitance pick-off force sensor having a proof mass with spaced-apart tooth-type electrodes (i.e., a comb structure) that is suspended by an annular suspension member.
One limitation of current methods of manufacturing the comb structure of the Leonardson accelerometer is the practice of manufacturing the proof mass and the cover plate separately, each including tooth-type electrodes, and then mechanically assembling the proof mass and the cover plate. This method requires mechanical alignment of the teeth of the proof mass with the recesses of the cover plate, and vice versa. Mechanical assembly in this way can achieve close tolerances between cover plate electrodes and adjacent proof mass electrodes, but not tolerance levels needed for comb drive devices. A need exists, therefore, for manufacturing methods that will allow smaller tolerances between adjacent electrodes than permitted by current manufacturing processes that use mechanical assembly.
The present invention provides a method of manufacturing a comb structure on a MEMS device which can achieve much smaller tolerances between opposing teeth of the comb structure than current manufacturing methods.
According to one aspect of the method of the present invention, tooth structures are formed on a first wafer. A second wafer is then bonded to the tooth structures of the first wafer. The tooth structures are then released to form a comb structure.
According to another aspect of the present invention, forming the tooth structures on the first wafer includes using oxidation, photolithography, etching, epitaxy, and chemical and mechanical polishing to create the tooth structures on the first wafer.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, releasing the tooth structures to form a comb structure includes forming holes through one of the first or second wafers and introducing etchant through the holes to release the tooth structures and form a comb structure.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
As shown in
As shown in
After removal of portions of the second insulating layer 36, portions of the first device layer 34 are removed, resulting in a structure including second teeth 18, spaces 29 between adjacent teeth 16, 18, and separation distance 28, as shown in
After removal of portions of the first device layer 34, the second teeth 18 and the remaining portions of the second insulating layer 36 are bonded to a second substrate layer 14, the second substrate layer 14 including a third insulating layer 38 and a handle substrate layer 40. Bonding may be effected using any suitable method such as metal eutectic bonding or silicon fusion bonding. This step forms the structure shown in
After thinning, through holes 42 are formed in the second substrate layer 14 (
After the through holes 42 are formed in the second substrate layer 14, an etchant (not shown) is introduced into the holes 42 where the etchant may remove the remaining portions of the insulating layers 32, 36 to release the comb structure 10 as shown in
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.