Combined scatter and transmission multi-view imaging system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10746674
  • Patent Number
    10,746,674
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 18, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present specification discloses a multi-view X-ray inspection system having, in one of several embodiments, a three-view configuration with three X-ray sources. Each X-ray source rotates and is configured to emit a rotating X-ray pencil beam and at least two detector arrays, where each detector array has multiple non-pixellated detectors such that at least a portion of the non-pixellated detectors are oriented toward both the two X-ray sources.
Description
FIELD OF THE INEVNTION

The present specification relates generally to the field of X-ray imaging system for security scanning and more specifically to multi-view X-ray scanning systems that advantageously combine transmission and backscatter imaging.


BACKGROUND

With the proliferation of terrorism and contraband trade, there exists an imminent need for systems that can effectively and efficiently screen cars, buses, larger vehicles and cargo to detect suspicious threats and illegal substances.


In the past, many technologies have been assessed for use in security inspection, and often X-ray imaging has been identified as a reasonable technique for such purposes. Several known X-ray scanning systems have been deployed for screening cars, buses and other vehicles. Such systems include transmission and backscatter X-ray screening systems. These prior art X-ray systems provide scanning from a very limited number of orientations, typically one and potentially two. For example, a transmission X-ray system may be configured in a side-shooter or top-shooter configuration. Backscatter systems may be available in single sided or, occasionally, in a three sided configuration.


Accordingly, there is need in the prior art for a multi-view imaging system which can have an arbitrary number of views, and typically more than one. There is also need in the art for a modular multi-view system that results in high detection performance at very low dose using a combination of backscatter and transmission imaging methodologies.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present specification discloses, in one embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising an X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are not oriented toward the X-ray source.


In another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising at least two X-ray sources, wherein each X-ray source is configured to emit an X-ray beam; and at least two detector arrays, wherein each detector array comprises a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are oriented toward both X-ray sources.


In yet another embodiment, the present specification discloses a multi-view X-ray inspection system having a three-view configuration comprising three X-ray sources, wherein each X-ray source rotates and is configured to emit a rotating X-ray pencil beam; and at least two detector arrays, wherein each detector array comprises a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are oriented toward both X-ray sources.


In an embodiment, the X-ray beam is a pencil beam and each X-ray source rotates over an angle of rotation, and the X-ray inspection system has an intrinsic spatial resolution and wherein said intrinsic spatial resolution is determined by a degree of collimation of the X-ray beam and not by a degree of pixellation of X-ray scan data. Further, in an embodiment, a single detector is exposed to only one X-ray beam from one of said X-ray sources at a specific point in time, and each detector defines a plane and wherein said plane is offset from each plane defined by each X-ray source. In an embodiment, each detector has a rectangular shape.


In another embodiment of the present invention, the X-ray inspection system comprises at least one X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors and a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.


In yet another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising at least one X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors, a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors, and a pair of fixed collimators positioned between the square profile transmission detector and one of said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.


In an embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein, when said X-ray inspection system is activated to detect gamma rays, said control system turns off an X-ray source and switches a detector data processing mode from current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode, is disclosed.


In another embodiment, the present invention discloses an X-ray inspection system having at least one X-ray source, wherein said X-ray source comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, and a rotary encoder.


In yet another embodiment, the present invention discloses, an X-ray inspection system having at least one X-ray source, wherein said X-ray source comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, a secondary collimator set, and a rotary encoder.


In an embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein said control system receives speed data and wherein said control system adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, data acquisition rate, or X-ray tube current based upon said speed data, is disclosed.


In another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein said control system adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, data acquisition rate, or X-ray tube current to ensure a uniform dose per unit length of an object being scanned.


The present specification is also directed toward an X-ray inspection system for scanning an object, the inspection system comprising: at least two rotating X-ray sources configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams, each of said X-ray beams defining a transmission path; at least two detector arrays, wherein each of said at least two detector arrays is placed opposite one of the at least two X-ray sources to form a scanning area; and at least one controller for controlling each of the X-ray sources to scan the object in a coordinated manner, such that the X-ray beams of the at least two X-ray sources do not cross transmission paths.


In one embodiment, each of the emitted X-ray beams is a pencil beam and each X-ray source rotates over a predetermined angle of rotation.


In one embodiment, each detector is a non-pixellated detector.


In one embodiment, a first, a second and a third rotating X-ray sources are configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams, wherein the first X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner; wherein the second X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially downward vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner; and wherein the third X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially horizontal position and moving in a clockwise manner.


In one embodiment, the controller causes each X-ray source to begin scanning the object in a direction that does not overlap with an initial scanning direction of any of the remaining X-ray sources, thereby eliminating cross talk among the X-ray sources.


In one embodiment, a plurality of scanned views of the object are collected simultaneously with each detector being irradiated by no more than one X-ray beam at any one time.


In one embodiment, a volume of the detectors is independent of a number of scanned views of the object obtained.


In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system has an intrinsic spatial resolution wherein said intrinsic spatial resolution is determined by a degree of collimation of an X-ray beam.


In one embodiment, the one or more detectors comprise an array of scintillator detectors having one or more photomultiplier tubes emerging from an edge of the detector array to allow X-ray beams from adjacent X-ray sources to pass an unobstructed face of the detector array opposite to the photomultiplier tubes.


In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are formed from a bar of a scintillation material that has a high light output efficiency, a fast response time and is mechanically stable over large volumes with little response to changing environmental conditions.


In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are gas ionization detectors comprising a Xenon or any other pressurized gas.


In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are formed from a semiconductor material such as but not limited to CdZnTe, CdTe, HgI, Si and Ge.


In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system is configured to detect gamma rays by turning off the X-ray sources switching the detectors from a current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode.


The present specification is also directed toward an X-ray inspection system for scanning an object, the inspection system comprising: at least two X-ray sources configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams for irradiating the object, wherein each of said X-ray beams defines a transmission path; a detector array comprising at least one transmission detector placed between at least two backscatter detectors, wherein each of said backscatter detectors detects backscattered X-rays emitted by a first X-ray source placed on a first side of the object and wherein the transmission detectors detects transmitted X-rays emitted by a second X-ray source placed on an opposing side of the object; and at least one controller for controlling each of the X-ray sources to concurrently scan the object in a coordinated, non-overlapping, manner such that the transmission paths of each of said X-ray beams does not cross.


In one embodiment, the detector array comprises at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors and a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.


In another embodiment, the detector array comprises a transmission detector positioned between two backscatter detectors wherein the detectors are placed within a single plane facing the object begin scanned and the transmission detector has a smaller exposed surface area than each of the backscatter detectors.


In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system further comprises a pair of fixed collimators positioned between the transmission detector and one of said at least two backscatter detectors.


In one embodiment, each of the X-ray sources comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, and a rotary encoder.


In another embodiment, each of the X-ray sources comprises: an extended anode X-ray tube coupled with a cooling circuit, the anode being at ground potential; a rotating collimator assembly comprising at least one collimating ring with slots cut at predefined angles around a circumference of the collimator, a length of each slot being greater than a width and an axis of rotation of the slot, and the width of the slots defining an intrinsic spatial resolution of the X-ray inspection system in a direction of the scanning; a bearing for supporting a weight of the collimator assembly and transferring a drive shaft from the collimator assembly to a drive motor; a rotary encoder for determining an absolute angle of rotation of the X-ray beams; and a secondary collimator set for improving spatial resolution in a perpendicular scanning direction.


In one embodiment, the controller receives speed data comprising a speed of the object and, based upon said speed data, adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, a data acquisition rate, or an X-ray tube current based upon said speed data.


The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 shows a single-view top-shooter transmission imaging system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a first side-shooter configuration of one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a second side-shooter configuration of one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a multi-view X-ray imaging system embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 shows X-ray detector offset geometry from a plane of X-ray sources for use in the multi-view X-ray imaging system of the present invention;



FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a suitable X-ray detector for use in the multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 7a is a side view of a detector array for use in the multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 7b is an end view of the detector array for use in the multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of a backscatter-transmission detector configuration for use with multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 9 shows an alternate embodiment of the backscatter-transmission detector configuration for use with multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 10 shows an embodiment of a suitable scanning X-ray source for use with multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 11a shows a secondary collimator set to improve spatial resolution in the perpendicular direction;



FIG. 11b shows the secondary collimator set of FIG. 11a positioned around an outer edge of a rotating collimator;



FIG. 12 shows an embodiment of read-out electronic circuit for use with detectors of the multi-view system of the present invention;



FIG. 13 shows a matrixed configuration where a set of ‘n’ multi-view imaging systems are monitored by a group of ‘m’ image inspectors;



FIG. 14 shows a deployment of a multi-view imaging system to scan cargo, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 15 shows a deployment of a multi-view imaging system to scan occupied vehicles in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 16a shows a mobile inspection system in its operating state ready for scanning;



FIG. 16b shows the step of folding up of vertical boom about a hinge point at the end of horizontal boom;



FIG. 16c shows the step of folding up the horizontal boom and, concurrently, the vertical boom around a hinge point at the top of a vertical support;



FIG. 16d shows the step of laying down the vertical boom toward the back of the mobile inspection vehicle;



FIG. 16e shows the step of folding up the bottom imaging section by at least 90 degrees from its operating position;



FIG. 16f shows the step of folding an outer horizontal base section by 180 degrees to cause it to lie parallel to inner base section; and



FIG. 16g shows the step of completely folding the base section by 90 degrees to complete the system stow.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present specification is directed towards an X-ray scanning system that advantageously combines image information from both backscatter and transmission technologies. More specifically, the present invention employs four discrete backscatter systems, however re-uses the pencil beam from one backscatter system to illuminate large area detectors from a second backscatter system so that simultaneous multi-sided backscatter and transmission imaging using the same set of four X-ray beams can be achieved. This approach is cost effective, in that it saves the cost of a segmented detector array yet still provides a comprehensive inspection.


The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.



FIG. 1 shows a single-view top-shooter transmission imaging system 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. System 100 comprises an X-ray source 105 with a rotating pencil beam collimator. When the X-ray beam is on, the collimator rotates continuously to form a moving X-ray beam 110 that sweeps over a fan-shaped area 115. A series of X-ray detectors 120 are placed in a transmission inspection geometry, namely opposite the X-ray beam 110 and with the inspected object between the detectors 120 and X-ray beam 110, to record the intensity of the X-ray beam 110 once it has passed through object 125, such as a vehicle. In one embodiment, detectors 120 are on the order of 1000 mm long and stacked end-to-end to form a linear sensor having a length equal to a plurality of meters. An advantage of such detectors is that they can be fabricated quite inexpensively, since they do not have spatial resolution.


An X-ray scan image, of the object 125, is formed by recording intensity of signal at output of each detector 120 at all times, as well as the angle of rotation of the X-ray pencil beam 110. In radial coordinates, object X-ray transmission is determined by plotting the recorded X-ray intensity from X-ray detectors 120 which is being pointed to by the X-ray beam 110 against its angle of rotation at any given instant. As known to persons of ordinary skill in the art a predetermined coordinate transform maps this data back onto a Cartesian grid or any other chosen co-ordinate grid.


In contrast to typical prior art X-ray imaging systems, the intrinsic spatial resolution of the system 100 is determined not by pixellation of the X-ray scan data but by collimation of the X-ray beam 110 at the source 105. Since the X-ray beam 110 is produced from a small focal spot with finite area, the X-ray pencil beam 110 is diverging and therefore the spatial resolution of the system 100 varies with distance of the detectors 120 from the source 105. Therefore, spatial resolution of the system 100 is least in the lower corners directly opposite to the X-ray source 105. However, this varying spatial resolution is corrected by deconvolution of the spatial impulse response of the system 100 as a function of rotation angle to thereby produce an image with constant perceptible spatial resolution.



FIG. 2 is a side-shooter configuration, of the system 100 of FIG. 1, that uses a similar identical X-ray source 205 with a rotating pencil beam 210 and a series of identical X-ray detectors 220 but in alternative locations. As shown in FIG. 3, a mirrored side-shooter configuration is achieved using the same X-ray source 305 and detectors 320 but in a mirror image configuration to that shown in FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a multi-view X-ray imaging system 400 that integrates the configurations of FIGS. 1 through 3 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, system 400 has a three-view configuration enabled by three simultaneously active rotating X-ray beams 405, 406 and 407 with plurality of detectors placed correspondingly, in one embodiment, in transmission configuration to form a scanning tunnel 420. System 400 provides a high degree of inspection capability, in accordance with an object of the present invention, while at the same time achieving this at substantially low X-ray dose since the volume of space irradiated at any moment in time is low compared to conventional prior art line scan systems that typically have large numbers of pixellated X-ray detectors and fan-beam X-ray irradiation.


As shown in FIG. 4, there is almost no cross talk between the three X-ray views which are collected simultaneously because the X-ray sources 405, 406, 407, are controlled by at least one controller 497, which may be local to or remote from the X-ray sources 405, 406, 407, that transmits control signals to each X-ray source 405, 406, 407 in a manner that causes them to scan the target object 495 in a coordinated, and non-overlapping, manner. In one embodiment, X-ray source 405 scans object 495 by starting at a substantially vertical position (between 12 o'clock and 1 o'clock) and moving in a clockwise manner. Concurrently, X-ray source 406 scans object 495 by starting at a substantially downward vertical position (around 4 o'clock) and moving in a clockwise manner. Concurrently, X-ray source 407 scans object 495 by starting at a substantially horizontal position (around 9 o'clock) and moving in a clockwise manner. It should be appreciated that each of the aforementioned X-ray sources could begin at a different position, provided that a) each starts a scan in a direction that does not overlap with the initial scanning direction of the other X-ray sources and b) each scans in a direction and at a speed that does not substantially overlap with the scan of the other X-ray sources.


According to an aspect of the present invention, there is almost no limit to the number of views which may be collected simultaneously in the system 400 with each detector segment 421 being irradiated by no more than one primary X-ray beam at any one time. In one embodiment, the detector configuration 430, shown in FIG. 4, comprises 12 detector segments 421 each of approximately 1 m in length to form an inspection tunnel of approximately 3 m (Width)×3 m (Height). In one embodiment, the detector configuration 430 is capable of supporting six independent X-ray views to allow transition of the sweeping X-ray views between adjacent detectors. An alternate embodiment comprising 0.5 m long detector segments 421 is capable of supporting up to 12 independent X-ray image views.


Persons of ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that, in system 400, the volume of detector material is independent of the number of views to be collected and the density of readout electronics is quite low compared to conventional prior art pixellated X-ray detector arrays. Additionally, a plurality of X-ray sources can be driven from a suitably rated high voltage generator thereby enabling additional X-ray sources to be added relatively simply and conveniently. These features enable the high density multi-view system 400 of the present invention to be advantageously used in security screening applications.


As shown in FIG. 5, a multi-view system, such as that shown in FIG. 4, has X-ray detectors 520 offset from the plane of the X-ray sources 505. The offset prevents X-ray beams 510 from being absorbed relatively strongly in the detector nearest to it, before the beam can enter the object under inspection.


According to another aspect, X-ray detectors are not required to have a spatial resolving function thereby allowing the primary beam to wander over the face of the detector, and to a side face of the detector, with minimal impact on overall performance of the imaging system. This considerably simplifies the detector configuration in comparison to a conventional prior art pixellated X-ray system, since, in a pixellated system, each detector needs to be oriented to point back towards a corresponding source to maintain spatial resolution. Thus, in prior art pixellated X-ray systems, a single detector cannot point to more than one source position and, therefore, a dedicated pixellated array is needed for each source point.



FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a suitable X-ray detector 600 for use in a multi-view system (such as the three-view system 400 of FIG. 4) of the present invention. As shown, detector 600 is formed from a bar 605 of X-ray detection material, that in one embodiment is fabricated from scintillation material. In a scintillation process, X-ray energy is converted to optical photons and these photons are collected using a suitable optical detector, such as a photomultiplier tube or photodiode 610. Suitable scintillation detection materials comprise plastic scintillators, CsI, BGO, NaI, or any other scintillation material known to persons of ordinary skill in the art that has high light output efficiency, fast time response and is mechanically stable over large volumes with little response to changing environmental conditions. Alternatively, detector materials can also comprise gas ionisation and gas proportional detectors, ideally with pressurised gas to enhance detection efficiency and high electric field strengths for improving signal collection times. Noble gas based detectors such as pressurised Xenon detectors are quite suitable for use with the multi-view system of present invention. Semiconductor detector materials could also be adopted, such as CdZnTe, CdTe, HgI, Si and Ge, although the capacitance, response time, costs and temperature response of these materials make them a less preferred choice.


An array of scintillator detectors 720 is shown in FIGS. 7a and 7b with photomultiplier tubes 725 emerging from the same long edge of scintillating material to allow X-ray beams from adjacent X-ray sources to pass the unobstructed face of the detector opposite to the photomultiplier tubes 725. Two X-ray sources 705, 706 are visible in the side view of the detector array 720 of FIG. 7a. Three X-ray sources 705, 706, 707 are visible in the end view of FIG. 7b.


From X-rays which are transmitted straight through an object and to a set of transmission detectors on the opposite side of the object, a fraction of the X-rays scatter from the object into other directions. It is known to those of ordinary skill in the art that the probability of detecting a scattered X-ray varies with the inverse square of distance of the detector from the scattering site. This means that a detector placed proximate to an X-ray beam, as it enters the object, will receive a much larger backscatter signal than a detector placed at significant distance from X-ray source.



FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of a detector configuration for use with multi-view system of the present invention to utilize X-rays backscattered from an object under inspection, in addition to transmitted X-rays. In this embodiment, an X-ray source 805 illuminates object 825 with a scanning pencil beam 810 of X-rays. A fraction of the X-rays 815 backscatter, which are then sensed by a pair of rectangular detectors 821, 822. Transmission X-ray beam 830 from a second X-ray source (not shown) at the other side of the object 825, is captured at a smaller square section detector 835.


It should be noted herein that the detectors can be of any shape and are not limited to a rectangular shape. In this particular embodiment, a rectangular shape is selected because it produces a uniform response and has a relatively manufacturing cost. In addition, a rectangular shape is easier to stack end-to-end compared with a circular or other curved detector. Similarly, using a smaller square cross-section will most likely yield the most uniform response, for example, when compared to a cylindrical detector with a circular cross section, and is relatively lower in cost to manufacture.


The square profile transmission detector 835 is placed between the two rectangular profile backscatter detectors 821, 822. A pair of fixed collimators 840 substantially reduces the effect of scattered radiation on the transmission detector 835, resulting from a nearby X-ray source, which measures relatively weak transmission signals from the opposing X-ray source (not shown). All detectors 821, 822 and 835 are shielded using suitable materials, such as steel and lead, around all faces except their active faces to avoid background signal due to natural gamma-radiation and unwanted X-ray scattering. Therefore, a transmission detector is sandwiched between two backscatter detectors, within a single plane facing the object begin scanned, and the transmission detector has a smaller exposed surface area than each of the backscatter detectors.



FIG. 9 shows an alternate embodiment of combined X-ray backscatter-transmission detectors. Here, a large imaging panel 900, which in one embodiment ranges from 1.5 m to 3.0 m in total length, comprises six individual X-ray detectors in addition to a scanning X-ray source 905. Four of the detectors 910, 911, 912 and 913 are used for recording X-ray backscatter from the local X-ray source 905, while two detectors 914, 915 having smaller exposed surface areas than each of the backscatter detectors 910, 911, 912, 913 are used to record transmission X-ray signals from an opposing X-ray generator.


Persons of ordinary skill in the art should note that with the detector configurations of FIGS. 8 and 9, a multi-view backscatter system of the present invention is achieved that has one backscatter view corresponding to each transmission view.


According to a further aspect, transmission imaging detectors can also be used for recording backscatter signals when not being directly irradiated by a transmission imaging beam. However, use of additional detection sensors, as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 substantially improve sensitivity of the backscatter detectors albeit at substantially higher cost. Therefore, a low cost system with modest backscatter performance can be assembled using just a single detector array in offset geometry as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6.


In one embodiment, the additional backscatter imaging panels are formed from a low cost high volume detector material such as scintillation materials comprising plastic scintillators, scintillation screens such as GdO2S with optical light guides, and solid scintillators such as CsI and NaI although any scintillator known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used, providing it has a fast response time (<10 us primary decay time), good uniformity, and stability against change in ambient conditions. Semiconductor and gas filled detectors may also be used, although these are less preferred with the exception of pressured Xenon gas detectors.


According to yet another aspect of the present invention, the large area array of detector panels of FIGS. 8 and 9 are also used as passive detectors of gamma radiation such as that emitted from special nuclear materials and other radioactive sources of interest such as Co-60, Cs-137 and Am-241. To enable system sensitivity to passive gamma rays, the X-ray sources are turned off and the detector electronics switched from a current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode. The object, such as a vehicle, under inspection is first scanned with the X-ray system of the present invention. It should be noted herein that the method of the present invention can be used in a single-view configuration or a multi-view configuration. If a suspicious item is detected, the vehicle is re-scanned, this time, in passive detection mode. This provides dual operating function capability for the imaging system of the present invention. Further, due to spatial positioning of the detector panels, it is possible to approximately localize radioactive source in space (recognizing the inverse square reduction of count rate at detectors due to the distance of the detector from the source). This localization is applied to the multi-view X-ray images in the form of a graphic overlay to show the position of a passive gamma source.


As shown in FIG. 10, an embodiment of a suitable scanning X-ray source 1000, for use with multi-view system of the present invention, comprises an extended anode X-ray tube 1005, a rotating collimator assembly 1010, a bearing 1015, a drive motor 1020, and a rotary encoder 1025.


In one embodiment, extended anode X-ray tube 1005 has the anode at ground potential. The anode is provided with a cooling circuit to minimize the thermal heating of the target during extended operating periods. In one embodiment, a rotating collimator assembly 1010 is advantageously formed from suitable engineering materials such as steel and tungsten. The collimator comprises at least one collimating ring with slots cut at appropriate angles around circumference of the collimator. The length of each slot is greater than its width and is longer than its axis of rotation and narrow in the direction of rotation. Width of the slots defines intrinsic spatial resolution of the transmission imaging system in the direction of the scanning.


Bearing 1015 supports the weight of the collimator assembly 1010 and transfers a drive shaft from the collimator assembly to a drive motor 1020. The drive motor 1020 is capable of being speed controlled using an electronic servo drive to maintain exact speed of rotation. A rotary encoder 1025 provides absolute angle of rotation since this is required to determine the position of each sampled detector point in the final generated image.


The rotating X-ray beam produced by the source 1000 of FIG. 10 has good resolution in one dimension only. To improve spatial resolution in the perpendicular direction, a secondary collimator set is provided as shown in FIGS. 11a and 11b. Referring now to FIGS. 11a and 11b simultaneously, hoop-like collimators 1100 are placed around outer edge of the rotating collimator 1110 to provide collimation into beam width direction. Since in one embodiment transmission detectors are likely to be of a square section (such as detectors 835 of FIG. 8) and when combined with offset system geometry of the present invention (as discussed with reference to FIG. 5), use of a secondary beam width collimator 1110 allows a specific shape of beam to be produced which precisely follows the center line of the imaging detectors.


In an embodiment of the present invention, additional collimation is placed at transmission detectors to constrain the width of X-ray beam before it enters the detection material itself. This allows an image of arbitrary spatial resolution to be collected even if an actual X-ray beam passing through object is of lower intrinsic spatial resolution. The width of the X-ray beam passing through the object is kept as small as possible, but consistent with the final collimator slot width, in order to minimise dose to the object under inspection.


Each detector in the multi-view system is provided with readout electronics which biases the photodetector, buffers and amplifies output signal from the photodetector and digitizes the resulting signal. FIG. 12 shows an embodiment of photomultiplier tube circuit 1205 with buffer amplifier and high speed analogue-to-digital (ADC) converter 1210. Data from the ADC 1210 is transferred into a system controller circuit 1215 along with digital data from all of the other photodetectors (DET1, DET2, . . . , DETn). The system controller 1215 also takes in encoder data 1220 from each of X-ray sources and provides motor drive signals 1225 to each X-ray source. Thus, the system controller 1215 coordinates data acquisition between each component of the detector system and generates an image data stream 1230 which provides data individually for each transmission and backscatter X-ray view.


A set of suitable sensors 1235 are used to measure speed of the vehicle or object under inspection as it passes through the inspection region. Suitable sensors comprise microwave radar cameras, scanning infra-red lasers or simply inductive sensors placed at known distance apart which can provide a measurement of speed (=distance/time) by comparing the times at which each sensor goes from false to true and vice versa as the vehicle scans past. This speed information, in one embodiment, is passed to the system controller 1215 which then adjusts collimator rotation speed, data acquisition rate and X-ray tube current to ensure a uniform dose per unit length of the object being scanned. By using a high speed ADC 1210, multiple samples are acquired at each transmission and backscatter source point so that an average value, or otherwise filtered value, is stored to improve signal-to-noise ratio of the imaging system.


The linear scanning velocity of X-ray beams across the face of a transmission imaging detector varies as a function of the distance from the source (i.e., more distant points suffer a faster linear scan rate). Therefore, in one embodiment, use of a high speed oversampling analogue-to-digital converter 1210 simplifies the adjustment of sample time to match the linear scanning velocity using, for example, encoder data 1220 to trigger the start of each sampling period, where the relevant encoder values are stored in a digital lookup table prior to the start of scanning. Sampling of data at a high speed allows for an improved de-convolution of the spatial resolution in the scanning direction by oversampling the measured data and generating a lower sample rate output image data compared to that which would be achieved by trying to de-convolve only a low sample rate image.


According to an embodiment, the system controller 1215 is advantageously designed using a combination of digital electronics, such as a field programmable gate array, and a microcontroller. The digital circuits provide precise timing that is required to build up a scanned image from multiple detectors and multiple encoders in an automated fashion, using only data from the encoders 1220 to coordinate activity. One or more microcontrollers provide system configuration capability, in-system programmability for field upgrade of firmware, and support for final data transmission process.


An embodiment utilizes a matrixed configuration where a set of ‘n’ multi-view imaging systems are monitored by a group of ‘m’ image inspectors. In this configuration, as shown in FIG. 13, each imaging system SYS1, SYS2, . . . , SYSn is connected to a network 1315 which provides a database 1305 for storage and recall of all image data. A job scheduler 1310 keeps track of which systems are online and of which operators INSPECT1, INSPECT2, . . . INSPECTm are available for inspection. Images from the database 1305 are transferred automatically to the next available inspector for review. Inspection results are passed back to the relevant imaging system which advantageously comprises traffic control measures to direct manual search of suspect vehicles or objects under inspection. System supervisor 1320 is, in one embodiment, a manager who can monitor the state of the imaging systems, monitor the efficiency of the operators and can double-check inspection results from inspectors.



FIG. 14 shows deployment of multi-view imaging system to scan cargo, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, comprising a gantry 1400 with main imaging system (such as the three-view system 400 of FIG. 4) at its center along with drive-up and drive-down ramps 1410, 1411 respectively provided to allow vehicles to pass through the centre of the inspection tunnel 1405. In an alternate embodiment, the gantry 1400 is provided with a conveyor to transport cargo through the inspection tunnel 1405. In one embodiment, suitable tunnel sizes are up to 800 mm×500 mm for small baggage, up to 1800 mm×1800 mm for packets and small cargo, up to 3000 mm×3000 mm for small vehicles and large cargo and up to 5500 mm×4000 mm for large vehicles and containerized cargo.



FIG. 15 shows deployment of multi-view imaging system to scan occupied vehicles in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, where vehicles in a multi-lane road 1500 approach a plurality of scanners 1505, one scanner per lane. Vehicles 1525 are scanned as they pass through respective scanners and approach a plurality of corresponding traffic control systems 1510 such as barrier or other suitable traffic control measures, including traffic lights. Decision results from image inspectors are passed automatically to these traffic control systems 1510 which then hold or divert traffic as necessary. In an example illustration, a holding area 1515 is shown with a vehicle 1520 parked therein as a result of an inspector/operator marking scanned image of the vehicle 1520 as suspicious.


In accordance with another aspect, the multi-view imaging system of the present invention is deployed in the form of a mobile inspection vehicle for rapid relocation to an inspection site. FIG. 16a shows mobile inspection system 1600 in its operating state ready for scanning. Vehicle 1605 carries an embodiment of a multi-view detection system, where a scanning tunnel 1610 is surrounded by a set of booms 1615, 1621, 1622.


An exemplary boom stow sequence is graphically illustrated using FIGS. 16b through 16g as follows:



FIG. 16b shows step 1650 comprising the folding up of vertical boom 1620 about a hinge point 1601 at the end of horizontal boom 1621. This can be achieved, for example, by using a hydraulic cylinder actuation although other mechanisms known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be considered such as pull wires and electronic drivers.


Step 1655, shown in FIG. 16c, comprises the simultaneous folding up of horizontal boom 1621 and vertical boom 1620 about a hinge point 1602 which is positioned at the top of vertical support boom 1622.


Step 1660, shown in FIG. 16d, comprises lowering vertical support boom 1622 toward the back of the vehicle 1605. Vertical support boom 1622 may be folded down to a steep angle to allow room for an operator inspection cabin to be co-located on the back of the vehicle. In another embodiment, vertical support boom 1622 may be folded down to be substantially parallel to the back platform of the vehicle to allow a compact system configuration which is advantageously developed to allow rapid re-location of systems using conventional air transportation.


Step 1665, shown in FIG. 16e, comprises folding up the base section 1625 of the imaging system by at least 90 degrees from its operating position. Thereafter, in step 1670, as shown in FIG. 16f, comprises folding the outer horizontal base section 1625a of the main base section 1625 by 180 degrees so that it lies parallel to the inner base section 1625b.


Finally, in step 1675, shown in FIG. 16g a complete folding of the base section occurs by a 90 degree rotation to complete system stow. The aforementioned steps, 1650 through 1675, for boom deployment to obtain operating state of FIG. 16a comprise boom stow steps in reverse sequence.


In alternate embodiments, the mobile inspection system 1600 is deployed with only the vertical and horizontal booms and not the lower imaging section. This gives dual view imaging capability in side-shooter configuration but no top-shooter view. In this mode, the system is capable of full drive-by scanning mode with an imaging configuration of at least one transmission view, with or without backscatter capability.


The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An X-ray inspection system for scanning an object, the inspection system comprising: a first X-ray source configured to rotate and emit a first X-ray beam having a first transmission path defined by a first area;a second X-ray source configured to rotate and emit a second X-ray beam having a second transmission path defined by a second area, wherein the second X-ray source is positioned apart from the first X-ray source and wherein an overlap of the first area and the second area define an scanning area;a first detector array placed on an opposite side of the scanning area relative to the first X-ray source;a second detector array placed on an opposite side of the scanning area relative to the second X-ray source; andat least one controller configured to control a rotation of the first X-ray source and a rotation of the second X-ray source such that the first X-ray beam and second X-ray beam are concurrently activated but do not cross.
  • 2. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the first X-ray source is at a same vertical level but is horizontally displaced from the second X-ray source.
  • 3. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the first X-ray source is both vertically and horizontally displaced from the second X-ray source.
  • 4. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the first X-ray source is configured to emit a pencil beam and configured to rotate over a predetermined angle of rotation.
  • 5. The X-ray inspection system of claim 4, wherein the second X-ray source is configured to emit a pencil beam and configured to rotate over a predetermined angle of rotation.
  • 6. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first detector array or the second detector array comprises one or more non-pixellated detectors.
  • 7. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, further comprising a third X-ray source configured to rotate and emit a third X-ray beam having a third transmission path defined by a third area, wherein the third X-ray source is positioned apart from the first X-ray source and the second X-ray source and wherein an overlap of the first area, second area, and third area define the scanning area.
  • 8. The X-ray inspection system of claim 7, wherein the third X-ray source is positioned vertically above the first X-ray source and the second X-ray source and wherein the first X-ray source is horizontally displaced from the second X-ray source.
  • 9. The X-ray inspection system of claim 7, wherein the first X-ray source, the second X-ray source and the third X-ray source are each configured to simultaneously emit the first X-ray beam, the second X-ray beam, and the third X-ray beam.
  • 10. The X-ray inspection system of claim 9, wherein the first X-ray source is configured to scan the object by starting at a substantially vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner.
  • 11. The X-ray inspection system of claim 10, wherein the third X-ray source is configured to scan the object by starting at a substantially downward vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner.
  • 12. The X-ray inspection system of claim 11, wherein the second X-ray source is configured to scan the object by starting at a substantially horizontal position and moving in a clockwise manner.
  • 13. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to cause the first X-ray source to begin scanning the object in a direction that does not overlap with an initial scanning direction of the second X-ray source, thereby eliminating cross talk between the first X-ray beam and the second X-ray beam.
  • 14. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein each detector of the first detector array and the second detector array is configured to be irradiated by only one X-ray beam at a time.
  • 15. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein each detector of the first detector array and the second detector array comprise at least one of CdZnTe, CdTe, HgI, Si or Ge.
  • 16. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first detector array or second detector array is configured to detect gamma rays when the first X-ray source and the second X-ray source is switched off by switching from a current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode.
  • 17. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first detector array or the second detector array comprises at least two backscatter detectors and a transmission detector positioned between the at least two backscatter detectors.
  • 18. The X-ray inspection system of claim 17, wherein the at least two backscatter detectors and the transmission detector are positioned within a single plane facing the object begin scanned and wherein the transmission detector has a smaller exposed surface area than each of the at least two backscatter detectors.
  • 19. The X-ray inspection system of claim 17, further comprising a fixed collimator positioned between the transmission detector and one of the at least two backscatter detectors.
  • 20. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the first X-ray source and the second X-ray source each comprise an anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, and a rotary encoder.
  • 21. The X-ray inspection system of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to receive data representing a speed of the object and, based upon said data, adjust at least one of a rotation speed of the first X-ray source or second X-ray source, a data acquisition rate, or an X-ray tube current.
CROSS-REFERENCE

The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/707,141, entitled “Combined Scatter and Transmission Multi-View Imaging System” and filed on May 8, 2015, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,211, of the same title, filed on Jan. 31, 2013, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,057,679 on Jun. 16, 2015, which relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/594,625, of the same title and filed on Feb. 3, 2012, for priority. The aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (210)
Number Name Date Kind
2831123 Daly Apr 1958 A
3766387 Heffan Oct 1973 A
3784837 Holmstrom Jan 1974 A
3961186 Leunbach Jun 1976 A
4047035 Dennhoven Sep 1977 A
4064440 Roder Dec 1977 A
4139771 Dennhoven Feb 1979 A
4203036 Tschunt May 1980 A
4210811 Dennhoven Jul 1980 A
4216499 Dennhoven Aug 1980 A
4366382 Kotowski Dec 1982 A
4380817 Harding Apr 1983 A
4430568 Yoshida Feb 1984 A
4525854 Molbert Jun 1985 A
4566113 Doenges Jan 1986 A
4599740 Cable Jul 1986 A
4641330 Herwig Feb 1987 A
4736401 Donges Apr 1988 A
4754469 Harding Jun 1988 A
4788704 Donges Nov 1988 A
4789930 Sones Dec 1988 A
4799247 Annis Jan 1989 A
4809312 Annis Feb 1989 A
4825454 Annis Apr 1989 A
4864142 Gomberg Sep 1989 A
4870670 Geus Sep 1989 A
4884289 Glockmann Nov 1989 A
4956856 Harding Sep 1990 A
4979202 Siczek Dec 1990 A
4991189 Boomgaarden Feb 1991 A
5007072 Jenkins Apr 1991 A
5008911 Harding Apr 1991 A
5022062 Annis Jun 1991 A
5065418 Bermbach Nov 1991 A
5091924 Bermbach Feb 1992 A
5098640 Gozani Mar 1992 A
5179581 Annis Jan 1993 A
5181234 Smith Jan 1993 A
5182764 Peschmann Jan 1993 A
5224144 Annis Jun 1993 A
5237598 Albert Aug 1993 A
5247561 Kotowski Sep 1993 A
5253283 Annis Oct 1993 A
5263075 McGann Nov 1993 A
5265144 Harding Nov 1993 A
5313511 Annis May 1994 A
5367552 Peschmann Nov 1994 A
5379334 Zimmer Jan 1995 A
5394454 Harding Feb 1995 A
5420905 Bertozzi May 1995 A
5430787 Norton Jul 1995 A
5493596 Annis Feb 1996 A
5524133 Neale Jun 1996 A
5600303 Husseiny Feb 1997 A
5600700 Krug Feb 1997 A
5638420 Armistead Jun 1997 A
5642393 Krug Jun 1997 A
5642394 Rothschild Jun 1997 A
5666393 Annis Sep 1997 A
5687210 Maitrejean Nov 1997 A
5692028 Geus Nov 1997 A
5692029 Husseiny Nov 1997 A
5696806 Grodzins Dec 1997 A
5745543 De Apr 1998 A
5751837 Watanabe May 1998 A
5763886 Schulte Jun 1998 A
5764683 Swift Jun 1998 A
5768334 Maitrejean Jun 1998 A
5787145 Geus Jul 1998 A
5805660 Perion Sep 1998 A
5838759 Armistead Nov 1998 A
5903623 Swift May 1999 A
5910973 Grodzins Jun 1999 A
5930326 Rothschild Jul 1999 A
5940468 Huang Aug 1999 A
5974111 Krug Oct 1999 A
6018562 Willson Jan 2000 A
6031890 Bermbach Feb 2000 A
6054712 Komardin Apr 2000 A
6058158 Eiler May 2000 A
6067344 Grodzins May 2000 A
6081580 Grodzins Jun 2000 A
6094472 Smith Jul 2000 A
6118850 Mayo Sep 2000 A
6128365 Bechwati Oct 2000 A
6151381 Grodzins Nov 2000 A
6188747 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6192101 Grodzins Feb 2001 B1
6192104 Adams Feb 2001 B1
6195413 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6198795 Naumann Mar 2001 B1
6212251 Tomura Apr 2001 B1
6218943 Ellenbogen Apr 2001 B1
6236709 Perry May 2001 B1
6249567 Rothschild Jun 2001 B1
6252929 Swift Jun 2001 B1
6256369 Lai Jul 2001 B1
6278115 Annis Aug 2001 B1
6282260 Grodzins Aug 2001 B1
6292533 Swift Sep 2001 B1
6301326 Bjorkholm Oct 2001 B2
6320933 Grodzins Nov 2001 B1
6327339 Chung Dec 2001 B1
6356620 Rothschild Mar 2002 B1
6421420 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6424695 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6434219 Rothschild Aug 2002 B1
6435715 Betz Aug 2002 B1
6442233 Grodzins Aug 2002 B1
6445765 Frank Sep 2002 B1
6453003 Springer Sep 2002 B1
6453007 Adams Sep 2002 B2
6456684 Mun Sep 2002 B1
6459761 Grodzins Oct 2002 B1
6459764 Chalmers Oct 2002 B1
6473487 Le Oct 2002 B1
RE37899 Grodzins Nov 2002 E
6483894 Hartick Nov 2002 B2
6507025 Verbinski Jan 2003 B1
6532276 Hartick Mar 2003 B1
6542574 Grodzins Apr 2003 B2
6542578 Ries Apr 2003 B2
6542580 Carver Apr 2003 B1
6542754 Sayers Apr 2003 B1
6543599 Jasinetzky Apr 2003 B2
6546072 Chalmers Apr 2003 B1
6552346 Verbinski Apr 2003 B2
6556653 Hussein Apr 2003 B2
6563903 Kang May 2003 B2
6567496 Sychev May 2003 B1
6580778 Meder Jun 2003 B2
6584170 Aust Jun 2003 B2
6597760 Beneke Jul 2003 B2
6606516 Levine Aug 2003 B2
6628745 Annis Sep 2003 B1
6636581 Sorenson Oct 2003 B2
6653588 Gillard-Hickman Nov 2003 B1
6658087 Chalmers Dec 2003 B2
6663280 Doenges Dec 2003 B2
6665373 Kotowski Dec 2003 B1
6665433 Roder Dec 2003 B2
6702459 Barnes Mar 2004 B2
6763635 Lowman Jul 2004 B1
6785357 Bernardi Aug 2004 B2
6798863 Sato Sep 2004 B2
6812426 Kotowski Nov 2004 B1
6816571 Bijjani Nov 2004 B2
6837422 Meder Jan 2005 B1
6839403 Kotowski Jan 2005 B1
6843599 Le Jan 2005 B2
6876719 Ozaki Apr 2005 B2
6879657 Hoffman Apr 2005 B2
6920197 Kang Jul 2005 B2
6922460 Skatter Jul 2005 B2
6928141 Carver Aug 2005 B2
7039159 Muenchau May 2006 B2
7092485 Kravis Aug 2006 B2
7099434 Adams Aug 2006 B2
7103137 Seppi Sep 2006 B2
RE39396 Swift Nov 2006 E
7162005 Bjorkholm Jan 2007 B2
7203276 Arsenault Apr 2007 B2
7207713 Lowman Apr 2007 B2
7218704 Adams May 2007 B1
7322745 Agrawal Jan 2008 B2
7333587 De Feb 2008 B2
7369463 Van Dullemen May 2008 B1
7369643 Kotowski May 2008 B2
7379530 Hoff May 2008 B2
7400701 Cason Jul 2008 B1
7486768 Allman Feb 2009 B2
7505556 Chalmers Mar 2009 B2
7517149 Agrawal Apr 2009 B2
7519148 Kotowski Apr 2009 B2
7551715 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7555099 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7593506 Cason Sep 2009 B2
7720195 Allman May 2010 B2
7742568 Smith Jun 2010 B2
7783004 Kotowski Aug 2010 B2
7809109 Mastronardi Oct 2010 B2
7817776 Agrawal Oct 2010 B2
7876880 Kotowski Jan 2011 B2
7963695 Kotowski Jun 2011 B2
7995705 Allman Aug 2011 B2
8000436 Seppi Aug 2011 B2
8059781 Agrawal Nov 2011 B2
8073099 Niu Dec 2011 B2
8194822 Rothschild Jun 2012 B2
8275091 Morton Sep 2012 B2
8503605 Morton Aug 2013 B2
8929509 Morton Jan 2015 B2
9057679 Morton Jun 2015 B2
9823201 Morton Nov 2017 B2
20030108146 Malamud Jun 2003 A1
20040141584 Bernardi Jul 2004 A1
20050180542 Leue Aug 2005 A1
20070009088 Edic Jan 2007 A1
20070053495 Morton Mar 2007 A1
20080037707 Rothschild Feb 2008 A1
20080198970 Kirshner Aug 2008 A1
20090041197 Clayton Feb 2009 A1
20090067575 Seppi Mar 2009 A1
20090086907 Smith Apr 2009 A1
20090116617 Mastronardi May 2009 A1
20090175412 Grodzins Jul 2009 A1
20110019799 Shedlock Jan 2011 A1
20110064192 Morton Mar 2011 A1
20110116597 Agrawal May 2011 A1
20110228896 Peschmann Sep 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
1947001 Apr 2007 CN
0261984 Mar 1988 EP
0864884 Sep 1998 EP
1135700 Mar 2005 EP
1254384 Jan 2008 EP
2054741 May 2009 EP
1733213 Feb 2010 EP
2049888 May 2014 EP
2277013 Oct 1994 GB
2007532876 Nov 2007 JP
102006132990 Dec 2006 KR
1998002763 Jan 1998 WO
1998003889 Jan 1998 WO
1998020366 May 1998 WO
1999039189 Aug 1999 WO
2004010127 Jan 2004 WO
2004097889 Nov 2004 WO
2005098400 Oct 2005 WO
2005098400 Oct 2005 WO
2009027667 Mar 2009 WO
2009067394 May 2009 WO
2009067394 May 2009 WO
2013116549 Aug 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Chou, C, “Fourier coded-aperture imaging in nuclear medicine”, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 141. No. 3, May 1994, pp. 179-184.
Mertz, L.N., et al, “Rotational aperture synthesis for x rays”, Journal. Optical Society of America, vol. 3, Dec. 1986, pp. 2167-2170.
International Search Report for PCT/US13/24191, Rapiscan Systems Inc., dated Jun. 25, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180313770 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61594625 Feb 2012 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14707141 May 2015 US
Child 15787823 US
Parent 13756211 Jan 2013 US
Child 14707141 US