The present specification relates generally to the field of X-ray imaging system for security scanning and more specifically to multi-view X-ray scanning systems that advantageously combine transmission and backscatter imaging.
With the proliferation of terrorism and contraband trade, there exists an imminent need for systems that can effectively and efficiently screen cars, buses, larger vehicles and cargo to detect suspicious threats and illegal substances.
In the past, many technologies have been assessed for use in security inspection, and often X-ray imaging has been identified as a reasonable technique for such purposes. Several known X-ray scanning systems have been deployed for screening cars, buses and other vehicles. Such systems include transmission and backscatter X-ray screening systems. These prior art X-ray systems provide scanning from a very limited number of orientations, typically one and potentially two. For example, a transmission X-ray system may be configured in a side-shooter or top-shooter configuration. Backscatter systems may be available in single sided or, occasionally, in a three sided configuration.
Accordingly, there is need in the prior art for a multi-view imaging system which can have an arbitrary number of views, and typically more than one. There is also need in the art for a modular multi-view system that results in high detection performance at very low dose using a combination of backscatter and transmission imaging methodologies.
The present specification discloses, in one embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising an X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are not oriented toward the X-ray source.
In another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising at least two X-ray sources, wherein each X-ray source is configured to emit an X-ray beam; and at least two detector arrays, wherein each detector array comprises a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are oriented toward both X-ray sources.
In yet another embodiment, the present specification discloses a multi-view X-ray inspection system having a three-view configuration comprising three X-ray sources, wherein each X-ray source rotates and is configured to emit a rotating X-ray pencil beam; and at least two detector arrays, wherein each detector array comprises a plurality of non-pixellated detectors, wherein at least a portion of said non-pixellated detectors are oriented toward both X-ray sources.
In an embodiment, the X-ray beam is a pencil beam and each X-ray source rotates over an angle of rotation, and the X-ray inspection system has an intrinsic spatial resolution and wherein said intrinsic spatial resolution is determined by a degree of collimation of the X-ray beam and not by a degree of pixellation of X-ray scan data. Further, in an embodiment, a single detector is exposed to only one X-ray beam from one of said X-ray sources at a specific point in time, and each detector defines a plane and wherein said plane is offset from each plane defined by each X-ray source. In an embodiment, each detector has a rectangular shape.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the X-ray inspection system comprises at least one X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors and a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.
In yet another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising at least one X-ray source configured to emit an X-ray beam; and a detector array comprising at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors, a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors, and a pair of fixed collimators positioned between the square profile transmission detector and one of said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.
In an embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein, when said X-ray inspection system is activated to detect gamma rays, said control system turns off an X-ray source and switches a detector data processing mode from current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode, is disclosed.
In another embodiment, the present invention discloses an X-ray inspection system having at least one X-ray source, wherein said X-ray source comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, and a rotary encoder.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention discloses, an X-ray inspection system having at least one X-ray source, wherein said X-ray source comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, a secondary collimator set, and a rotary encoder.
In an embodiment, an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein said control system receives speed data and wherein said control system adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, data acquisition rate, or X-ray tube current based upon said speed data, is disclosed.
In another embodiment, the present specification discloses an X-ray inspection system comprising a control system wherein said control system adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, data acquisition rate, or X-ray tube current to ensure a uniform dose per unit length of an object being scanned.
The present specification is also directed toward an X-ray inspection system for scanning an object, the inspection system comprising: at least two rotating X-ray sources configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams, each of said X-ray beams defining a transmission path; at least two detector arrays, wherein each of said at least two detector arrays is placed opposite one of the at least two X-ray sources to form a scanning area; and at least one controller for controlling each of the X-ray sources to scan the object in a coordinated manner, such that the X-ray beams of the at least two X-ray sources do not cross transmission paths.
In one embodiment, each of the emitted X-ray beams is a pencil beam and each X-ray source rotates over a predetermined angle of rotation.
In one embodiment, each detector is a non-pixellated detector.
In one embodiment, a first, a second and a third rotating X-ray sources are configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams, wherein the first X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner; wherein the second X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially downward vertical position and moving in a clockwise manner; and wherein the third X-ray source scans the object by starting at a substantially horizontal position and moving in a clockwise manner.
In one embodiment, the controller causes each X-ray source to begin scanning the object in a direction that does not overlap with an initial scanning direction of any of the remaining X-ray sources, thereby eliminating cross talk among the X-ray sources.
In one embodiment, a plurality of scanned views of the object are collected simultaneously with each detector being irradiated by no more than one X-ray beam at any one time.
In one embodiment, a volume of the detectors is independent of a number of scanned views of the object obtained.
In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system has an intrinsic spatial resolution wherein said intrinsic spatial resolution is determined by a degree of collimation of an X-ray beam.
In one embodiment, the one or more detectors comprise an array of scintillator detectors having one or more photomultiplier tubes emerging from an edge of the detector array to allow X-ray beams from adjacent X-ray sources to pass an unobstructed face of the detector array opposite to the photomultiplier tubes.
In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are formed from a bar of a scintillation material that has a high light output efficiency, a fast response time and is mechanically stable over large volumes with little response to changing environmental conditions.
In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are gas ionization detectors comprising a Xenon or any other pressurized gas.
In one embodiment, the one or more detectors are formed from a semiconductor material such as but not limited to CdZnTe, CdTe, HgI, Si and Ge.
In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system is configured to detect gamma rays by turning off the X-ray sources switching the detectors from a current integrating mode to a pulse counting mode.
The present specification is also directed toward an X-ray inspection system for scanning an object, the inspection system comprising: at least two X-ray sources configured to simultaneously emit rotating X-ray beams for irradiating the object, wherein each of said X-ray beams defines a transmission path; a detector array comprising at least one transmission detector placed between at least two backscatter detectors, wherein each of said backscatter detectors detects backscattered X-rays emitted by a first X-ray source placed on a first side of the object and wherein the transmission detectors detects transmitted X-rays emitted by a second X-ray source placed on an opposing side of the object; and at least one controller for controlling each of the X-ray sources to concurrently scan the object in a coordinated, non-overlapping, manner such that the transmission paths of each of said X-ray beams does not cross.
In one embodiment, the detector array comprises at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors and a square profile transmission detector positioned between said at least two rectangular profile backscatter detectors.
In another embodiment, the detector array comprises a transmission detector positioned between two backscatter detectors wherein the detectors are placed within a single plane facing the object begin scanned and the transmission detector has a smaller exposed surface area than each of the backscatter detectors.
In one embodiment, the X-ray inspection system further comprises a pair of fixed collimators positioned between the transmission detector and one of said at least two backscatter detectors.
In one embodiment, each of the X-ray sources comprises an extended anode X-ray tube, a rotating collimator assembly, a bearing, a drive motor, and a rotary encoder.
In another embodiment, each of the X-ray sources comprises: an extended anode X-ray tube coupled with a cooling circuit, the anode being at ground potential; a rotating collimator assembly comprising at least one collimating ring with slots cut at predefined angles around a circumference of the collimator, a length of each slot being greater than a width and an axis of rotation of the slot, and the width of the slots defining an intrinsic spatial resolution of the X-ray inspection system in a direction of the scanning; a bearing for supporting a weight of the collimator assembly and transferring a drive shaft from the collimator assembly to a drive motor; a rotary encoder for determining an absolute angle of rotation of the X-ray beams; and a secondary collimator set for improving spatial resolution in a perpendicular scanning direction.
In one embodiment, the controller receives speed data comprising a speed of the object and, based upon said speed data, adjusts at least one of a collimator rotation speed of an X-ray source, a data acquisition rate, or an X-ray tube current based upon said speed data.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
The present specification is directed towards an X-ray scanning system that advantageously combines image information from both backscatter and transmission technologies. More specifically, the present invention employs four discrete backscatter systems, however re-uses the pencil beam from one backscatter system to illuminate large area detectors from a second backscatter system so that simultaneous multi-sided backscatter and transmission imaging using the same set of four X-ray beams can be achieved. This approach is cost effective, in that it saves the cost of a segmented detector array yet still provides a comprehensive inspection.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
An X-ray scan image, of the object 125, is formed by recording intensity of signal at output of each detector 120 at all times, as well as the angle of rotation of the X-ray pencil beam 110. In radial coordinates, object X-ray transmission is determined by plotting the recorded X-ray intensity from X-ray detectors 120 which is being pointed to by the X-ray beam 110 against its angle of rotation at any given instant. As known to persons of ordinary skill in the art a predetermined coordinate transform maps this data back onto a Cartesian grid or any other chosen co-ordinate grid.
In contrast to typical prior art X-ray imaging systems, the intrinsic spatial resolution of the system 100 is determined not by pixellation of the X-ray scan data but by collimation of the X-ray beam 110 at the source 105. Since the X-ray beam 110 is produced from a small focal spot with finite area, the X-ray pencil beam 110 is diverging and therefore the spatial resolution of the system 100 varies with distance of the detectors 120 from the source 105. Therefore, spatial resolution of the system 100 is least in the lower corners directly opposite to the X-ray source 105. However, this varying spatial resolution is corrected by deconvolution of the spatial impulse response of the system 100 as a function of rotation angle to thereby produce an image with constant perceptible spatial resolution.
As shown in
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is almost no limit to the number of views which may be collected simultaneously in the system 400 with each detector segment 421 being irradiated by no more than one primary X-ray beam at any one time. In one embodiment, the detector configuration 430, shown in
Persons of ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that, in system 400, the volume of detector material is independent of the number of views to be collected and the density of readout electronics is quite low compared to conventional prior art pixellated X-ray detector arrays. Additionally, a plurality of X-ray sources can be driven from a suitably rated high voltage generator thereby enabling additional X-ray sources to be added relatively simply and conveniently. These features enable the high density multi-view system 400 of the present invention to be advantageously used in security screening applications.
As shown in
According to another aspect, X-ray detectors are not required to have a spatial resolving function thereby allowing the primary beam to wander over the face of the detector, and to a side face of the detector, with minimal impact on overall performance of the imaging system. This considerably simplifies the detector configuration in comparison to a conventional prior art pixellated X-ray system, since, in a pixellated system, each detector needs to be oriented to point back towards a corresponding source to maintain spatial resolution. Thus, in prior art pixellated X-ray systems, a single detector cannot point to more than one source position and, therefore, a dedicated pixellated array is needed for each source point.
An array of scintillator detectors 720 is shown in
From X-rays which are transmitted straight through an object and to a set of transmission detectors on the opposite side of the object, a fraction of the X-rays scatter from the object into other directions. It is known to those of ordinary skill in the art that the probability of detecting a scattered X-ray varies with the inverse square of distance of the detector from the scattering site. This means that a detector placed proximate to an X-ray beam, as it enters the object, will receive a much larger backscatter signal than a detector placed at significant distance from X-ray source.
It should be noted herein that the detectors can be of any shape and are not limited to a rectangular shape. In this particular embodiment, a rectangular shape is selected because it produces a uniform response and has a relatively manufacturing cost. In addition, a rectangular shape is easier to stack end-to-end compared with a circular or other curved detector. Similarly, using a smaller square cross-section will most likely yield the most uniform response, for example, when compared to a cylindrical detector with a circular cross section, and is relatively lower in cost to manufacture.
The square profile transmission detector 835 is placed between the two rectangular profile backscatter detectors 821, 822. A pair of fixed collimators 840 substantially reduces the effect of scattered radiation on the transmission detector 835, resulting from a nearby X-ray source, which measures relatively weak transmission signals from the opposing X-ray source (not shown). All detectors 821, 822 and 835 are shielded using suitable materials, such as steel and lead, around all faces except their active faces to avoid background signal due to natural gamma-radiation and unwanted X-ray scattering. Therefore, a transmission detector is sandwiched between two backscatter detectors, within a single plane facing the object begin scanned, and the transmission detector has a smaller exposed surface area than each of the backscatter detectors.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art should note that with the detector configurations of
According to a further aspect, transmission imaging detectors can also be used for recording backscatter signals when not being directly irradiated by a transmission imaging beam. However, use of additional detection sensors, as shown in
In one embodiment, the additional backscatter imaging panels are formed from a low cost high volume detector material such as scintillation materials comprising plastic scintillators, scintillation screens such as GdO2S with optical light guides, and solid scintillators such as CsI and NaI although any scintillator known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be used, providing it has a fast response time (<10 us primary decay time), good uniformity, and stability against change in ambient conditions. Semiconductor and gas filled detectors may also be used, although these are less preferred with the exception of pressured Xenon gas detectors.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, the large area array of detector panels of
As shown in
In one embodiment, extended anode X-ray tube 1005 has the anode at ground potential. The anode is provided with a cooling circuit to minimize the thermal heating of the target during extended operating periods. In one embodiment, a rotating collimator assembly 1010 is advantageously formed from suitable engineering materials such as steel and tungsten. The collimator comprises at least one collimating ring with slots cut at appropriate angles around circumference of the collimator. The length of each slot is greater than its width and is longer than its axis of rotation and narrow in the direction of rotation. Width of the slots defines intrinsic spatial resolution of the transmission imaging system in the direction of the scanning.
Bearing 1015 supports the weight of the collimator assembly 1010 and transfers a drive shaft from the collimator assembly to a drive motor 1020. The drive motor 1020 is capable of being speed controlled using an electronic servo drive to maintain exact speed of rotation. A rotary encoder 1025 provides absolute angle of rotation since this is required to determine the position of each sampled detector point in the final generated image.
The rotating X-ray beam produced by the source 1000 of
In an embodiment of the present invention, additional collimation is placed at transmission detectors to constrain the width of X-ray beam before it enters the detection material itself. This allows an image of arbitrary spatial resolution to be collected even if an actual X-ray beam passing through object is of lower intrinsic spatial resolution. The width of the X-ray beam passing through the object is kept as small as possible, but consistent with the final collimator slot width, in order to minimise dose to the object under inspection.
Each detector in the multi-view system is provided with readout electronics which biases the photodetector, buffers and amplifies output signal from the photodetector and digitizes the resulting signal.
A set of suitable sensors 1235 are used to measure speed of the vehicle or object under inspection as it passes through the inspection region. Suitable sensors comprise microwave radar cameras, scanning infra-red lasers or simply inductive sensors placed at known distance apart which can provide a measurement of speed (=distance/time) by comparing the times at which each sensor goes from false to true and vice versa as the vehicle scans past. This speed information, in one embodiment, is passed to the system controller 1215 which then adjusts collimator rotation speed, data acquisition rate and X-ray tube current to ensure a uniform dose per unit length of the object being scanned. By using a high speed ADC 1210, multiple samples are acquired at each transmission and backscatter source point so that an average value, or otherwise filtered value, is stored to improve signal-to-noise ratio of the imaging system.
The linear scanning velocity of X-ray beams across the face of a transmission imaging detector varies as a function of the distance from the source (i.e., more distant points suffer a faster linear scan rate). Therefore, in one embodiment, use of a high speed oversampling analogue-to-digital converter 1210 simplifies the adjustment of sample time to match the linear scanning velocity using, for example, encoder data 1220 to trigger the start of each sampling period, where the relevant encoder values are stored in a digital lookup table prior to the start of scanning. Sampling of data at a high speed allows for an improved de-convolution of the spatial resolution in the scanning direction by oversampling the measured data and generating a lower sample rate output image data compared to that which would be achieved by trying to de-convolve only a low sample rate image.
According to an embodiment, the system controller 1215 is advantageously designed using a combination of digital electronics, such as a field programmable gate array, and a microcontroller. The digital circuits provide precise timing that is required to build up a scanned image from multiple detectors and multiple encoders in an automated fashion, using only data from the encoders 1220 to coordinate activity. One or more microcontrollers provide system configuration capability, in-system programmability for field upgrade of firmware, and support for final data transmission process.
An embodiment utilizes a matrixed configuration where a set of ‘n’ multi-view imaging systems are monitored by a group of ‘m’ image inspectors. In this configuration, as shown in
In accordance with another aspect, the multi-view imaging system of the present invention is deployed in the form of a mobile inspection vehicle for rapid relocation to an inspection site.
An exemplary boom stow sequence is graphically illustrated using
Step 1655, shown in
Step 1660, shown in
Step 1665, shown in
Finally, in step 1675, shown in
In alternate embodiments, the mobile inspection system 1600 is deployed with only the vertical and horizontal booms and not the lower imaging section. This gives dual view imaging capability in side-shooter configuration but no top-shooter view. In this mode, the system is capable of full drive-by scanning mode with an imaging configuration of at least one transmission view, with or without backscatter capability.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/707,141, entitled “Combined Scatter and Transmission Multi-View Imaging System” and filed on May 8, 2015, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,211, of the same title, filed on Jan. 31, 2013, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,057,679 on Jun. 16, 2015, which relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/594,625, of the same title and filed on Feb. 3, 2012, for priority. The aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2831123 | Daly | Apr 1958 | A |
3766387 | Heffan | Oct 1973 | A |
3784837 | Holmstrom | Jan 1974 | A |
3961186 | Leunbach | Jun 1976 | A |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4064440 | Roder | Dec 1977 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4203036 | Tschunt | May 1980 | A |
4210811 | Dennhoven | Jul 1980 | A |
4216499 | Dennhoven | Aug 1980 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4380817 | Harding | Apr 1983 | A |
4430568 | Yoshida | Feb 1984 | A |
4525854 | Molbert | Jun 1985 | A |
4566113 | Doenges | Jan 1986 | A |
4599740 | Cable | Jul 1986 | A |
4641330 | Herwig | Feb 1987 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4754469 | Harding | Jun 1988 | A |
4788704 | Donges | Nov 1988 | A |
4789930 | Sones | Dec 1988 | A |
4799247 | Annis | Jan 1989 | A |
4809312 | Annis | Feb 1989 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870670 | Geus | Sep 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4956856 | Harding | Sep 1990 | A |
4979202 | Siczek | Dec 1990 | A |
4991189 | Boomgaarden | Feb 1991 | A |
5007072 | Jenkins | Apr 1991 | A |
5008911 | Harding | Apr 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5065418 | Bermbach | Nov 1991 | A |
5091924 | Bermbach | Feb 1992 | A |
5098640 | Gozani | Mar 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5237598 | Albert | Aug 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5263075 | McGann | Nov 1993 | A |
5265144 | Harding | Nov 1993 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5379334 | Zimmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5394454 | Harding | Feb 1995 | A |
5420905 | Bertozzi | May 1995 | A |
5430787 | Norton | Jul 1995 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5687210 | Maitrejean | Nov 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny | Nov 1997 | A |
5696806 | Grodzins | Dec 1997 | A |
5745543 | De | Apr 1998 | A |
5751837 | Watanabe | May 1998 | A |
5763886 | Schulte | Jun 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5768334 | Maitrejean | Jun 1998 | A |
5787145 | Geus | Jul 1998 | A |
5805660 | Perion | Sep 1998 | A |
5838759 | Armistead | Nov 1998 | A |
5903623 | Swift | May 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6031890 | Bermbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6054712 | Komardin | Apr 2000 | A |
6058158 | Eiler | May 2000 | A |
6067344 | Grodzins | May 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6118850 | Mayo | Sep 2000 | A |
6128365 | Bechwati | Oct 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6188747 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192101 | Grodzins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195413 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198795 | Naumann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212251 | Tomura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252929 | Swift | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256369 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292533 | Swift | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6320933 | Grodzins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327339 | Chung | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356620 | Rothschild | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6421420 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434219 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435715 | Betz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445765 | Frank | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453003 | Springer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456684 | Mun | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
RE37899 | Grodzins | Nov 2002 | E |
6483894 | Hartick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507025 | Verbinski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532276 | Hartick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542578 | Ries | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542580 | Carver | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542754 | Sayers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543599 | Jasinetzky | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556653 | Hussein | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563903 | Kang | May 2003 | B2 |
6567496 | Sychev | May 2003 | B1 |
6580778 | Meder | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584170 | Aust | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606516 | Levine | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628745 | Annis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636581 | Sorenson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658087 | Chalmers | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663280 | Doenges | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665433 | Roder | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6702459 | Barnes | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6763635 | Lowman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785357 | Bernardi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798863 | Sato | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812426 | Kotowski | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816571 | Bijjani | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837422 | Meder | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843599 | Le | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6876719 | Ozaki | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879657 | Hoffman | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6920197 | Kang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922460 | Skatter | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928141 | Carver | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7039159 | Muenchau | May 2006 | B2 |
7092485 | Kravis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099434 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
RE39396 | Swift | Nov 2006 | E |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7203276 | Arsenault | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207713 | Lowman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218704 | Adams | May 2007 | B1 |
7322745 | Agrawal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333587 | De | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7369463 | Van Dullemen | May 2008 | B1 |
7369643 | Kotowski | May 2008 | B2 |
7379530 | Hoff | May 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7486768 | Allman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505556 | Chalmers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517149 | Agrawal | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519148 | Kotowski | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555099 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7720195 | Allman | May 2010 | B2 |
7742568 | Smith | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783004 | Kotowski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809109 | Mastronardi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817776 | Agrawal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7876880 | Kotowski | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963695 | Kotowski | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7995705 | Allman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000436 | Seppi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8059781 | Agrawal | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073099 | Niu | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8194822 | Rothschild | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275091 | Morton | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8503605 | Morton | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8929509 | Morton | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9057679 | Morton | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9823201 | Morton | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20030108146 | Malamud | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040141584 | Bernardi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050180542 | Leue | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070009088 | Edic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070053495 | Morton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080037707 | Rothschild | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080198970 | Kirshner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090041197 | Clayton | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067575 | Seppi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086907 | Smith | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116617 | Mastronardi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090175412 | Grodzins | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110019799 | Shedlock | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110064192 | Morton | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110116597 | Agrawal | May 2011 | A1 |
20110228896 | Peschmann | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1947001 | Apr 2007 | CN |
0261984 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0864884 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1135700 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1254384 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2054741 | May 2009 | EP |
1733213 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2049888 | May 2014 | EP |
2277013 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2007532876 | Nov 2007 | JP |
102006132990 | Dec 2006 | KR |
1998002763 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998003889 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998020366 | May 1998 | WO |
1999039189 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2004010127 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004097889 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005098400 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098400 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2009027667 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009067394 | May 2009 | WO |
2009067394 | May 2009 | WO |
2013116549 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chou, C, “Fourier coded-aperture imaging in nuclear medicine”, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 141. No. 3, May 1994, pp. 179-184. |
Mertz, L.N., et al, “Rotational aperture synthesis for x rays”, Journal. Optical Society of America, vol. 3, Dec. 1986, pp. 2167-2170. |
International Search Report for PCT/US13/24191, Rapiscan Systems Inc., dated Jun. 25, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180313770 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61594625 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14707141 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15787823 | US | |
Parent | 13756211 | Jan 2013 | US |
Child | 14707141 | US |