The present invention pertains to methods for forming a copper seed layer on a barrier layer of a partially fabricated integrated circuit.
Damascene processing is a method for forming interconnections on integrated circuits that involves formation of inlaid metal lines in trenches and vias formed in a dielectric layer (inter-metal dielectric). The metal conductive lines are formed by an electroplating process. Because copper or other mobile conductive material provides the conductive paths of the integrated circuit, the underlying silicon devices must be protected from metal ions (e.g., Cu2+) that might otherwise diffuse or drift into the silicon. Suitable materials for diffusion barrier include tantalum, tantalum nitride, tungsten, titanium tungsten, titanium nitride, tungsten nitride, and the like.
After the diffusion barrier is deposited and prior to electroplating, a seed layer of copper or other metal is typically applied by a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process to enable subsequent electrofilling of the features with copper inlay. In order to serve as a seed for electroplating, the seed layer should be continuous, stable and have good adhesion to the barrier layer. A barrier or capping layer may be deposited on the inlaid copper after it has been planarized via a chemical mechanical polishing process.
An integration issue when using Cu as the primary conductor in devices is electromigration. Electromigration redistributes the Cu in the line, and the resulting extrusions can expand into the dielectric space. Extrusions can cause the Cu metal to extend past the Cu line into an adjacent Cu line, thereby causing a short circuit.
As the dimension of semiconductor devices continues to shrink, the reliability of the device, particularly the electromigration of copper interconnects, becomes more challenging. This reduction of the electromigration performance is due to the increase of current density and decrease of the critical void dimension as the dimensions shrink.
The present invention provides improved methods of depositing copper seed layers in copper interconnect structure fabrication processes. The resulting structures have improved electromigration performance and reduced line resistance associated with the use of an alloy seed. According to various embodiments, the methods involve depositing a copper seed bilayer on a barrier layer in a recessed feature on a partially fabricated semiconductor substrate. The bilayer has a copper alloy seed layer and a pure copper seed layer, with the pure copper seed layer deposited on the copper alloy seed layer. The copper seed bilayers have reduced line resistance increase and provide better electromigration performance than conventional doped copper seed layers. Precise line resistance control can be achieved by tuning the bilayer thickness to meet the desired electromigration performance.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific embodiments are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or by using alternate elements or processes. In other instances well-known processes, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
In this application, the term “wafer” will be used interchangeably with “partially fabricated integrated circuit.” One skilled in the art would understand that the term “partially fabricated integrated circuit” can refer to a silicon wafer during any of many stages of integrated circuit fabrication thereon. The term “substrate” is also used and includes wafers.
The invention finds particular use in damascene processing.
Suitable materials for diffusion barrier 105 include tantalum, tantalum nitride, tungsten, titanium, titanium tungsten, titanium nitride, tungsten nitride, and the like. In a typical process, barrier 105 is formed by a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process such as sputtering, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process, or an atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. In the embodiments described herein copper serves as the metal in damascene processes, as depicted in these figures. The resultant partially fabricated integrated circuit 100 is a representative substrate for subsequent damascene processing, as depicted in
As depicted in
The process follows, as depicted in
The dual damascene process continues, as depicted in
Next, as depicted in
After diffusion barrier 123 is deposited, a seed layer 124 is deposited as shown in
Copper routes 125 and 107 are now in electrical contact and form conductive pathways, as they are separated only by diffusion barrier 123, which is also somewhat conductive. A diffusion barrier or capping layer such as silicon carbide may then be deposited over the copper routes.
As indicated above, the present invention relates to deposition of seed layers on diffusion barriers. Although
The above description refers to copper as the conductive material. Copper is typically used in place of other materials such as aluminum because of its higher conductivity. One issue that is present with copper conductive lines is electromigration. Electromigration is the transport of material in a conductor caused by the gradual movement of ions due to the momentum transfer between conducting electrons and diffusing metal atoms. In an integrated circuit having copper conductive paths, electromigration redistributes the copper, and the resulting extrusions can expand into the dielectric space. In general, electromigration occurs when the metal atoms of conductive lines are subjected to electric fields while the circuit is in operation. The metal atoms will redistribute in the direction of the electron flow to form voids (areas lacking metal material) and extrusions (protrusions of metal material outside of the metal or dielectric barrier). For example, this is illustrated along a metal line in damascene device of
As the dimension of semiconductor devices continues to shrink, electromigration performance is reduced and electromigration becomes more of a problem. This reduction in electromigration performance is due to the increase of current density and decrease of the critical void dimension required to short the interconnect or other conductive path. Alloy doping, such as aluminum doping is used in conventional devices to improve the electromigration performance. Prior to the methods described herein, however, electromigration improvement has come at the cost of high line resistance increase when alloy doping is used. High line resistance in turn leads to higher RC delay and decreasing device performance. The methods described herein reduce Cu interconnect line resistance increase when alloy doping is used for reliability improvement.
In certain embodiments, a Ta/TaN bilayer is used as the barrier layer. The barrier layer is generally deposited to conform to the recessed feature. Forming the conformal barrier layer may involve resputtering and/or additional deposition operations to achieve generally conformal and uniform coverage. In certain embodiments, all or some of the portion of the barrier layer at the feature bottom may be removed, e.g., by resputtering all of the barrier layer material at the bottom of the feature or by a punch-through resputter etch into the underlying copper lines. Other steps may be added to the general process flow as necessary.
In an operation 303, the substrate is then transferred to a metal seed deposition module or chamber. The metal seed deposition module is a vacuum chamber that is capable of depositing a metal seed layer. In some embodiments, a suitable PVD apparatus employs a magnetic array for electron confinement to generate a high density plasma. The magnetic array may be implemented as one or more electromagnets, permanent magnets, or some combination of electromagnets and permanent magnets. The apparatus may include other magnets located proximate the substrate region for promoting process uniformity.
Examples of suitable apparatuses include hollow cathode magnetron (HCM) sputtering modules. Such apparatuses are described in further below as well as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,482,611; 6,179,973; 6,193,854; and 6,217,716, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Other types of sputtering apparatuses that may be used in accordance with the invention include planar magnetron sputtering modules. Also, as described below, the apparatus typically employs a RF biased electrostatic chuck pedestal, which secures the wafer and applies an RF bias on the wafer, if needed.
In the metal seed deposition chamber, a doped copper seed layer is deposited on the barrier layer to conform to the feature. In certain embodiments, the doped copper seed layer may contact the underlying metal at the bottom of the feature if the barrier layer is not present there. Deposition of the doped layer typically occurs using a target having the desired alloy concentration. Examples of Cu dopants include Al, Mg, Zr, Ti, Sn, Pd and Cr. If necessary, e.g., to increase uniformity or thickness, depositing the doped copper seed layer may involve resputtering and/or additional deposition steps.
Next, a pure copper seed layer is deposited on the doped copper seed layer, forming a copper seed bilayer. See block 307. In this context, pure copper refers to substantially pure copper, i.e., without a significant dopant concentration. According to various embodiments, the pure layer may have less than 0.5% dopant concentration, less than 0.25% dopant concentration, less than 0.1% dopant concentration, less than 0.05% dopant concentration, and/or substantially no dopant concentration. In certain embodiments, operations 305 and 307 are performed without exposure to ambient or other oxidant. In many embodiments, this involves transferring the substrate to a second metal deposition chamber or module without a vacuum break, i.e., using a vacuum transfer module. In other embodiments, deposition of both layers of the bilayer seed layer are carried out in the same chamber, e.g., using a segmented target as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/564,222, filed Jun. 22, 2006, and titled “Method and Apparatus for Controlling Sputtered Flux in PVD Sources,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
After the copper alloy seed bilayer is deposited, the feature is filled with copper using an electrofilling process and the feature is planarized with a CMP process. Block 309. The feature is then encapsulated by depositing a dielectric diffusion barrier such as silicon carbide or other material on the feature.
Using the bilayer Cu seed layer provides improved reliability over conventional Al-doped Cu seed monolayers, as well as providing improved line resistance over these conventional processes. The bilayer also provides improved electromigration performance and conformal deposition of the seed layer over conventional copper only seed layers. Use of doped-Cu/pure Cu bilayer was found to unexpectedly result in enhanced electromigration performance over conventional doped Cu monolayers, even when the total amount of dopant remained the same or was reduced. Based on these unexpected results (detailed below) and without being bound by a particular theory, it is believed that the pure copper seed layer of the bilayer protects the aluminum or other dopant in the doped copper layer from oxidizing, which in turn allows diffusion of the dopant to reinforce the copper/overlying diffusion interface thereby improving electromigration.
Total field thickness of the bilayer depends on the technology node, ranging from about 300 Å (e.g., for 32 nm) to over 800 (e.g., for 65 nm). For the 45 nm node, for example, the total thickness of the bilayer typically ranges from 300-600 Å; for the 32 nm node, the total thickness may be between about 300-350 Å, or lower.
The pure copper layer of the bilayer should be thick enough to prevent oxidation of the underlying alloy layer. According to various embodiments, the thickness of the pure copper layer ranges from about 25 Å to a few hundred angstroms. The thickness of the alloy layer should be sufficient to provide electromigration improvement. According to various embodiments, the thickness of the alloy layer ranges from about 25 Å to a few hundred angstroms.
Electromigration performance and line resistance increases with increasing amounts of dopant in the bilayer. For equivalent or improved electromigration performance, the Al/Cu+Cu seed bilayers have less resistance shift than conventional doped monolayers.
In certain embodiments, the ratio of the alloy layer thickness to pure copper layer thickness is greater than 1:1, i.e., the alloy layer is thicker than the pure copper layer. Bilayers having such ratios results in electromigration improvement over a alloy monolayer having more dopant while providing reducing line resistance shift.
In other embodiments, the ratio may be about 1:1 or less than 1:1. As is described further below with respect to
Apparatus
As indicated above, any suitable deposition apparatus appropriate for performing the metal seed deposition operations may be used, including PVD apparatuses that use hollow cathode magnetron (HCM) or planar magnetron targets.
An inert gas, such as argon, is introduced to into the hollow region of the cathode target 607 to form plasma. An intense magnetic field is produced by electromagnets 605a-605d within the cathode target region. Additional electromagnets are arranged downstream of the cathode target so that different currents can be applied to each electromagnet, thereby producing an ion flux and a controlled deposition and/or etch rate and uniformity. A metal spacer 609, typically held at plasma floating potential, is used, in conjunction with the source electromagnets to shape the plasma distribution at the target mouth. The RF bias ESC pedestal 603 holds the wafer substrate in place and can apply a RF bias to the wafer substrate. The ion energy, and therefore the deposition and/or etch rate can also be controlled by the pedestal RF bias. Typically, the amount of sputtering is controlled by the RF power at fixed RF frequency. Various RF frequencies can be used to achieve this effect. One preferred RF frequency is 13.56 MHz. An additional function of the ESC pedestal is to provide wafer temperature control during sputter etch and deposition. Typically, argon backside gas is used to provide thermal coupling between the substrate and the ESC. In many cases, the ESC is cooled during deposition.
As indicated above, the metal seed deposition, as well as other process steps in the overall process flow may be in done in the same processing tool. Tools that allow degas, ALD or CVD deposition, and PVD deposition all under the same vacuum are the INOVA and INOVA NExT deposition systems available from Novellus Systems of San Jose, Calif. These systems are comprised of processing modules, e.g. for degas, cool, preclean, PVD, CVD or ALD processes, mounted to the same wafer handling module. Once a wafer is in the tool and a vacuum is established, all of the above described process aspects are performed. In particular embodiments, the barrier layer deposition occurs in a tantalum (or other barrier material) PVD deposition module, with the wafer then transferred to a first metal seed PVD deposition module for copper alloy seed layer deposition, and then to a second metal seed PVD deposition module for pure copper seed layer deposition.
Although the discussion herein focuses on deposition of seed layers by PVD processes, the scope of the invention extends to other techniques for deposition of the bilayers including ALD, iALD, CVD and combinations thereof. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements in electromigration and line resistance shift may also be obtained with these methods and would understand how to implement them.
Returning to
In certain embodiments, the controller controls all or some of the activities of the deposition apparatus. The system controller executes system control software including sets of instructions for controlling the timing, DC power levels, mixture of gases, chamber pressure, chamber temperature, wafer temperature, RF power levels, wafer chuck or susceptor position, and other parameters of a particular process. Other computer programs stored on memory devices associated with the controller may be employed in some embodiments.
Typically there will be a user interface associated with controller 612. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
The computer program code for controlling the deposition, resputtering and other processes in a process sequence can be written in any conventional computer readable programming language: for example, assembly language, C, C++, Pascal, Fortran or others. Compiled object code or script is executed by the processor to perform the tasks identified in the program.
The controller parameters relate to process conditions such as, for example, desired thickness of each layer of a bilayer, deposition time, process gas composition and flow rates, temperature, pressure, plasma conditions such as RF power levels and the low frequency RF frequency, cooling gas pressure, and chamber wall temperature. These parameters are provided to the user in the form of a recipe, and may be entered utilizing the user interface.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of the system controller. The signals for controlling the process are output on the analog and digital output connections of the deposition apparatus.
The system software may be designed or configured in many different ways. For example, various chamber component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the chamber components necessary to carry out the inventive deposition processes. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include substrate positioning code, process gas control code, pressure control code, heater control code, and plasma control code.
A bilayer thickness program may include program code for controlling the thickness of each layer of the bilayer by modulating deposition time, RF power levels, etc. A substrate positioning program may include program code for controlling chamber components that are used to load the substrate onto a pedestal or chuck and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of the chamber such as a gas inlet and/or target. A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into the chamber prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the chamber. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the chamber by regulating, e.g., a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the chamber. A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas such as helium to the wafer chuck. A plasma control program may include code for setting RF power levels applied to the process electrodes at the target and the wafer chuck.
Examples of chamber sensors that may be monitored during deposition and/or resputtering include mass flow controllers, pressure sensors such as manometers, and thermocouples located in pedestal or chuck. Appropriately programmed feedback and control algorithms may be used with data from these sensors to maintain desired process conditions
Experimental
Upstream and downstream electromigration test structures were fabricated using the copper seed deposition conditions shown in the below table to deposit seed layers prior to copper electroplating of the lines (trenches) and vias of the structures:
Downstream Electromigration Improvement
The following test structure dimensions (cross-section depicted in
M1 line dimensions (L×W×H): 500 μm×90 nm×180 nm
Via: 90 nm diameter. Single link.
Temperature: 325° C.
Current density (J): 2.5 MAmperes/cm2, with stress current adjusted based on the physical SEM cross section of the mean trench dimension, where the actual stress current applied on individual test key is calculated based on the measured resistance of individual test key. 16 test keys are generally used for each test.
The following results were obtained:
The Al/Cu—Cu bilayer resulted the highest mean time to failure: the 335 Å Al0.01/Cu+115 Å Cu seed bilayer (process ID 4) resulted in mean TTF of 738, an improvement over both of the conventional Al-doped copper seed monolayers, which had mean TTFs of 239 (process ID 2) and 84.3 (process ID 3), respectively. It should be noted that for the Al-doped monolayers, the layer having the highest concentration of aluminum results in the best electromigration performance, as would be expected. Similarly, increasing the amount of aluminum in the bilayers increases electromigration performance. Unexpectedly, the 335 Å Al0.01/Cu+115 Å Cu seed bilayer and 225 Å Al0.01/Cu+225 Å Cu seed bilayer outperform the 450 Å Al0.01/Cu monolayer despite having less aluminum in the seed layer. It should also be noted that the 225 Å Al0.01/Cu+225 Å Cu performs significantly better than the reverse bilayer, despite having the same total amount of aluminum.
Upstream Electromigration Improvement
The following test structure dimensions (cross-section depicted in
M2 line dimensions (L×W×H): 500 μm×90 nm×180 nm
Via: 90 nm diameter. Single link.
Temperature: 325° C.
Current density (J): 2.5 MAmperes/cm2, current adjusted
The test structure used for the upstream electromigration test has narrow metal 2 line width and thus high aspect ratio for the trench over via structure. Hence during the metal barrier/seed process (PVD) and electro plating, the requirements for PVD step coverage and formation of continuous layer are more stringent due to the resulted high aspect ratio structure. The Al-doped Cu/pure Cu bilayers show significant improvement over the Al-doped Cu monolayers. Note that while both the 335 Å Al0.01/Cu+115 Å Cu and 225 Å Al0.01/Cu+225 Å Cu bilayers (process IDs 4 and 5, respectively) have significantly higher mean time to failure than the Al-doped Cu monolayers and the baseline pure copper monolayer, the 115 Å Al0.01/Cu+335 Å Cu (process ID 6) does not. This indicates that the amount of dopant in the bilayer is not high enough to provide electromigration improvement. Further more, split 7 which has pure Cu as the first layer followed by 1% Al/Cu does not provide EM improvement as split 5, suggesting the order of depositing alloy Cu seed and pure Cu seed can impact the electromigration improvement.
Resistance
Line and via resistance were measured for each of the Al/Cu splits. No Kelvin via resistance difference was observed between splits.
Although various details have been omitted for clarity's sake, various design alternatives may be implemented. Therefore, the present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3763031 | Scow et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3767551 | Lang et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
4058430 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4392111 | Rostoker | Jul 1983 | A |
4492620 | Matsuo et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4588490 | Cuomo et al. | May 1986 | A |
4604180 | Hirukawa et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609903 | Toyokura et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4622121 | Wegmann et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4737384 | Murthy et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4874493 | Pan | Oct 1989 | A |
4963524 | Yamazaki | Oct 1990 | A |
4999096 | Nihei et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5009963 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5084412 | Nakasaki | Jan 1992 | A |
5126028 | Hurwitt et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139825 | Gordon et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5178739 | Barnes et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194398 | Miyachi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5221449 | Colgan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5281485 | Colgan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298091 | Edwards, III et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5378506 | Imai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5482611 | Helmer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5622608 | Lanford et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629221 | Chao et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654233 | Yu | Aug 1997 | A |
5656860 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
5766379 | Lanford et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789027 | Watkins et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801089 | Kenney | Sep 1998 | A |
5904565 | Nguyen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948215 | Lantsman | Sep 1999 | A |
5962923 | Xu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969422 | Ting et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985762 | Geffken et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6037257 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046108 | Liu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074544 | Reid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077403 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077780 | Dubin | Jun 2000 | A |
6080285 | Liu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093966 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099702 | Reid et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100200 | Van Buskirk et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105078 | Crockett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110346 | Reid et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114238 | Liao | Sep 2000 | A |
6120641 | Stevens et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124203 | Joo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126798 | Reid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139712 | Patton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147000 | You et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156167 | Patton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159354 | Contolini et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159857 | Liu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162344 | Reid et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179973 | Lai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179983 | Reid et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193854 | Lai et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203613 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217716 | Fai Lai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221757 | Schmidbauer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228754 | Iacoponi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235163 | Angelo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249055 | Dubin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251242 | Fu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265313 | Huang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271591 | Dubin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274008 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277249 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280597 | Kashiwada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287977 | Hashim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6333547 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340435 | Bjorkman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342133 | D'Couto et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6342448 | Lin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350353 | Gopalraja et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6358376 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387805 | Ding et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6391785 | Satta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395642 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402907 | Rich | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417094 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436251 | Gopalraja et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440854 | Rozbicki | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444104 | Gopalraja et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6448176 | Grill et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451177 | Gopalraja et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6492262 | Uzoh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498091 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500762 | Hashim et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509267 | Woo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538324 | Tagami et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541374 | de Felipe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554914 | Rozbicki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559061 | Hashim et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562715 | Chen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566246 | de Felipe et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589887 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605534 | Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607977 | Rozbicki et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607982 | Powell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613199 | Tobin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624066 | Lu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642146 | Rozbicki et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652718 | D'Couto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656841 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660622 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673716 | D'Couto et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683425 | Lai | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706142 | Savas et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706155 | Morimoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709557 | Kailasam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709987 | Hashim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6755945 | Yasar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758947 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764940 | Rozbicki et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784096 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790776 | Ding et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6841044 | Ruzic | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6893541 | Chiang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905965 | Subrahmanyan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919275 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943111 | Lin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949457 | Fiordalice et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6969448 | Lau | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6992012 | Haskim et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030031 | Wille et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037830 | Rumer et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7048837 | Somekh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7074714 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7135402 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186648 | Rozbicki et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7253109 | Ding et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294574 | Ding et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7365001 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7510634 | Klawuhn et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7645696 | Dulkin et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7659197 | Juliano | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7682966 | Rozbicki et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7732314 | Danek et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
20010039113 | Blalock et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000382 | Morrissey et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028576 | Hashim et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041028 | Choi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020110999 | Lu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115287 | Hashim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030034244 | Yasar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030116427 | Ding et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129828 | Cohen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030216035 | Rengarajan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040048461 | Chen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040094402 | Gopalraja et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040152301 | Hashim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040171250 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188239 | Robison et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211661 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224507 | Marieb et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266175 | Chen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006222 | Ding et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020080 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032382 | Rossman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085068 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085070 | Park | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103620 | Chistyakov | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106865 | Chung et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110147 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050173239 | Somekh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186793 | Omoto et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211545 | Cerio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252765 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255690 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255691 | Ding et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255700 | Gopalraja et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266682 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272254 | Ding et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014378 | Aggarwal et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024953 | Rao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030151 | Ding et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057843 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125100 | Arakawa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148253 | Chung et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060207873 | Fu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060258152 | Haider | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020922 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070178682 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197012 | Yang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070283886 | Chung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080142359 | Gopalraja et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080190760 | Tang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080310005 | Tonar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090233438 | Ding et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1567548 | Jan 2005 | CN |
0 692 551 | Jan 1996 | EP |
11-186273 | Sep 1999 | JP |