I. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed toward detecting defects on substrates such as transparent and coated glass substrates, silicon wafers, and magnetic disk media and more particularly toward measuring wear, surface roughness, scratches, particles, stains, pits, mounds, surface topography, step heights, and inclusions by shining bright light along a direction on the surface of the substrate.
II. Description of Background Art
Coated thin film disks are used in a variety of industries including the semiconductor and the magnetic hard disk industry. A computer hard disk (magnetic storage device) is a non-volatile memory device that can store large amounts of data. One problem that the manufacturers of hard disks experience is how to maximize the operating life of a hard disk. When a hard disk fails the data stored therein may be difficult, expensive, or impossible to retrieve. Failure of a hard disk may be caused by defects on the surface of the thin film disk. It is important to be able to detect and classify these defects in order to prevent disk drive failure and to control the manufacturing process.
A schematic of a thin film disk used in magnetic storage devices is shown in
A schematic of a semiconductor wafer is shown in
Thus, what is needed is a system and method for examining the surface of substrates, such as silicon wafers or magnetic disk media, for topological and non-topological defects and features by controlling the angle of illumination plane of incidence with respect to the features or defects.
A system and method are provided for categorizing defects, such as scratches, particles, and pits, on the surface of an object. The method optimally detects particles, circumferential and radial scratches, by controlling the angle of the illumination plane of incidence with respect to the feature or defect on the surface of an object. The scrattered light intensities produced when the light beams strike a defect are measured by a CCD camera the scattered light intensities of the beams are compared to determine the aspect ratio of the defect.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to the figures where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Also in the figures, the left most digit of each reference number corresponds to the figure in which the reference number is first used.
One method of detecting particles or defects on substrates such as silicon wafers or magnetic disk media is to shine bright light on the surface of the substrate. The light scattered by particles or defects can then be detected by imaging optics and detectors such as CCD cameras.
It is also desirable to be able to differentiate the type of defects detected. For example, when inspecting textured magnetic disk media, knowing if the scattered light signal from a position on the substrate is from the surface texture or a particle is desirable. This type of information will help the user to pinpoint the source of the defect.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/444,652 filed on May 22, 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, discloses a system and method for detecting defects on the surface of an object by using a pair of substantially orthogonal directed laser beams, one in the radial and one in the circumferential direction. It also discloses single beam techniques to classify radial and circumferential defects.
The scratch or texture can be a straight line or a circumferential line (circular). On magnetic disk media, typically the texture line is circumferential (nearly concentric to the disk itself).
One method of directing the light beam along radial directions toward the center of the disk 402 is to use a series of beams, e.g., eight beams, which approximate radial illumination on the disk. In other embodiments, more or less beams may be used to cover the surface of the disk.
Another method, as illustrated in
A CCD camera or another type of detector is placed above the disk to collect the scattered light. The above described illumination technique will preferentially detect scratches which are oriented in the circumferential direction. In order to detect particles or radial scratches it is desired to minimize the signal from the circumferential texture. This may be accomplished by directing the light in the circumferential direction as shown in
The circumferentially oriented beam 602 will produce only minimal scatter from the circumferential texture and as a result much smaller particles may be detected with a circumferentially oriented beam since the “noise” from the texture is not present. The circumferentially oriented beam will also optimally detect radial scratches and particles 601. One way to obtain the circumferential illumination is shown in
In
The light intensity from the surface of the substrate scatters up to Fresnel lens 804, which focuses the beams onto a high resolution CCD camera 805. CCD camera 805 captures the image from the scattered light. The CCD camera images the surface feature from the scattered light into pixels on the CCD array. The pixel data from the CCD array is digitized and read by a computer. In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered light image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes an algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.
The optical device shown in
In an embodiment, the apparatus to detect scratches and particles is that shown in
In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for comparing and classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered lighter image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes the above-described algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.
The above embodiments have described optical designs that compare a radial and a circumferentially oriented light beams to determine if a defect is a scratch or a particle. It is also possible to detect and classify a defect as a scratch or a particle by using only a single light beam or a set of light beams oriented in either the radial or circumferential directions. The case of detecting circumferential scratches is shown in
In an embodiment, the apparatus to detect circumferential scratches and particles is that shown in
In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for comparing and classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered lighter image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes the above-described algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.
The case of detecting radial scratches or particles is shown in the embodiment shown in
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment and various alternate embodiments, it will be understood by persons skilled in the revelant art that various changes in form and details can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/269,336, filed Nov. 8, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,218,391 entitled Material Independent Optical Profilometer, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/444,652, entitled Method of Detecting and Classifying Scratches and Particles on Thin Film Disks or Wafers, by Steven W. Meeks, filed May 22, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,357 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/219,632 filed on Aug. 14, 2002, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,500) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/126,154 filed on Apr. 19, 2002, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,765) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/029,957 filed on Dec. 21, 2001, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,957) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/861,280 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,757,056) filed on May 18, 2001, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/818,199 filed on Mar. 26, 2001, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/718,054 filed on Nov. 20, 2000 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,749), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/414,388 filed on 7 Oct. 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,665,078), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/347,622 filed on 2 Jul. 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,671), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/136,897 filed on Aug. 19, 1998 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,615), which claims priority from provisional application No. 60/059,740 filed on 22 Sep. 1997 (applicant's reference number 2924), which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2593189 | Rinia | Apr 1952 | A |
4378159 | Galbraith | Mar 1983 | A |
4585348 | Chastang | Apr 1986 | A |
4601575 | Tamaki | Jul 1986 | A |
4650333 | Crabb | Mar 1987 | A |
4794264 | Quackenbos et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4870631 | Stoddard | Sep 1989 | A |
4873430 | Juliana | Oct 1989 | A |
4905311 | Hino et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4999510 | Hayano | Mar 1991 | A |
5017012 | Merritt, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5026982 | Stroman | Jun 1991 | A |
5067817 | Glenn | Nov 1991 | A |
5125741 | Okada | Jun 1992 | A |
5168386 | Galbraith | Dec 1992 | A |
5189481 | Jann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5270794 | Tsuji | Dec 1993 | A |
5392116 | Makosch | Feb 1995 | A |
5416594 | Gross et al. | May 1995 | A |
5565979 | Gross | Oct 1996 | A |
5604585 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608527 | Valliant et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610897 | Yamamoto | Mar 1997 | A |
5633747 | Nikoonahad | May 1997 | A |
5644562 | de Groot | Jul 1997 | A |
5737085 | Zollars et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5798829 | Vaez-Iravani | Aug 1998 | A |
5864394 | Jordan, III et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880838 | Marx et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883714 | Jann et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5898500 | Canteloup et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903342 | Yatsugake | May 1999 | A |
5963314 | Worster et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985680 | Singhal | Nov 1999 | A |
5986763 | Inoue | Nov 1999 | A |
5995226 | Abe | Nov 1999 | A |
6020966 | Ausschnitt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031615 | Meeks | Feb 2000 | A |
6081325 | Leslie | Jun 2000 | A |
6091493 | Stover et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122046 | Almogy | Sep 2000 | A |
6130749 | Meeks | Oct 2000 | A |
6154280 | Borden | Nov 2000 | A |
6169601 | Eremin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172752 | Haruna et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198533 | Meeks | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229610 | Meeks | May 2001 | B1 |
6268919 | Meeks | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6392749 | Meeks | May 2002 | B1 |
6433877 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6515745 | Vurens et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6556290 | Maeda et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6603541 | Lange | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6617603 | Ishiguro et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624884 | Imaino | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624894 | Olszak et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665078 | Meeks | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678046 | Opsal | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687008 | Peale | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690473 | Stanke et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704435 | Imaino | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717671 | Meeks | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751044 | Meeks | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757056 | Meeks et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6781103 | Lane | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804003 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813034 | Rosencwaig et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6917433 | Levy et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940609 | Scheiner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6956660 | Meeks et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7019850 | Finarov | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023547 | Venkatasubbarao et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042556 | Sun | May 2006 | B1 |
7042577 | Jacob et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7046352 | Dayal et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7075630 | Meeks | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7113284 | Meeks | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7161683 | Weitzel | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20020015146 | Meeks | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020107650 | Wack et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118359 | Fairley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145740 | Meeks | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163634 | Meeks | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025905 | Meeks | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030179370 | Goldberg et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040017561 | Meeks | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046959 | Meeks | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040130710 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160604 | Meeks | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169850 | Meeks | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233419 | Meeks | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050023491 | Young | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057747 | Meeks | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050206888 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060072106 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070030493 | Zettler et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4105192 | Aug 1991 | DE |
0080540 | Jun 1983 | EP |
03085514 | Apr 1991 | JP |
07055702 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10325711 | Dec 1998 | JP |
WO9416310 | Jul 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060250612 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60059740 | Sep 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10444652 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11269336 | US | |
Parent | 09818199 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 09861280 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11269336 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11485798 | US | |
Parent | 10219632 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10444652 | US | |
Parent | 10126154 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 10219632 | US | |
Parent | 10029957 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10126154 | US | |
Parent | 09861280 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10029957 | US | |
Parent | 09718054 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 09818199 | US | |
Parent | 09414388 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 09718054 | US | |
Parent | 09347622 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 09414388 | US | |
Parent | 09136897 | Aug 1998 | US |
Child | 09347622 | US |