Detecting and classifying surface features or defects by controlling the angle of the illumination plane of incidence with respect to the feature or defect

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7688435
  • Patent Number
    7,688,435
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 13, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 30, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
Scratches, pits and particles which are smaller or larger than the beam size may be measured and identified by a single and dual multiple beam techniques. In one embodiment, this the invention uses a pair of orthogonally oriented white light beams, one in the radial and one in the circumferential direction. The scattered light from the radial and circumferential beams allows the detection and classification of particles, pits and scratches. In other embodiments, single beam techniques are used to classify radial and circumferential defects.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. Field of the Invention


The present invention is directed toward detecting defects on substrates such as transparent and coated glass substrates, silicon wafers, and magnetic disk media and more particularly toward measuring wear, surface roughness, scratches, particles, stains, pits, mounds, surface topography, step heights, and inclusions by shining bright light along a direction on the surface of the substrate.


II. Description of Background Art


Coated thin film disks are used in a variety of industries including the semiconductor and the magnetic hard disk industry. A computer hard disk (magnetic storage device) is a non-volatile memory device that can store large amounts of data. One problem that the manufacturers of hard disks experience is how to maximize the operating life of a hard disk. When a hard disk fails the data stored therein may be difficult, expensive, or impossible to retrieve. Failure of a hard disk may be caused by defects on the surface of the thin film disk. It is important to be able to detect and classify these defects in order to prevent disk drive failure and to control the manufacturing process.


A schematic of a thin film disk used in magnetic storage devices is shown in FIG. 1. It includes a magnetic thin film (layer) 106, which is deposited upon a substrate 108 (typically a NiP plated Al—Mg alloy or glass). The magnetic thin film 106 can be protected by a thin film of carbon 104 (carbon layer), for example, whose thickness is typically 20 to 200 Angstroms (Å). The carbon layer 104 is typically coated with a thin layer (10 to 30 Angstroms) of a fluorocarbon lubricant 102 (lubricant layer). The lubricant layer 102 serves to increase the durability of the underlying carbon layer 104 particularly when the magnetic read/write head contacts the disk, for example when the disk drive is turned off. The hard disk drive industry has been dramatically improving storage capacity by flying the thin film head closer to the surface of the thin film disk. As a result even very small defects can cause a hard drive to fail. These defects may be topographic such as scratches, pits, mounds, or particles or they may be non-topographic such as stains or inclusions. It is useful to measure all these types of defects to control the disk manufacturing process and improve disk drive manufacturing yield.


A schematic of a semiconductor wafer is shown in FIG. 2. The structure of a semiconductor wafer can be very complex and FIG. 2 shows only a typical structure of a wafer that is undergoing the copper dual damascene process. In FIG. 2, 201 is the copper layer 202 is the second plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited (PECVD) oxide layer, 203 is the first PECVD oxide layer and 204 is the silicon substrate. The copper layer 201 is polished down using a chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process until only the via holes and copper lines remain. The problem is that the CMP process can leave residual copper, nitride, or CMP slurry on the surface of the wafer. In addition, stains, particles, scratches, and micro-waviness may be present on the polished wafer. It is useful to detect and measure such defects to control the process of making the wafer. Fewer defects will also mean greater wafer yields at the end of the process. The problem in the hard disk, semiconductor and photonics industries is to inspect these magnetic disks and wafers for defects such as particles, scratches, pits, mounds, stains, topographic irregularities and inclusions. Conventional techniques to solve these problems are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,674,875, 5,694,214, 5,748,305, and 6,157,444 that are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. These patents describe techniques to measure defects using essentially sophisticated scatterometers and reflectometers. Prior art systems also measure defects by shining white light on a surface at a high angle of incidence; the image of the surface is then captured with a charge couple device (CCD) camera and analyzed for defects. None of these systems enables the detection and classification of surface features or defects by controlling the angle of the illumination plane of incidence with respect to the features or defects in order to detect and differentiate topological and non-topological defects.


Thus, what is needed is a system and method for examining the surface of substrates, such as silicon wafers or magnetic disk media, for topological and non-topological defects and features by controlling the angle of illumination plane of incidence with respect to the features or defects.


SUMMARY

A system and method are provided for categorizing defects, such as scratches, particles, and pits, on the surface of an object. The method optimally detects particles, circumferential and radial scratches, by controlling the angle of the illumination plane of incidence with respect to the feature or defect on the surface of an object. The scrattered light intensities produced when the light beams strike a defect are measured by a CCD camera the scattered light intensities of the beams are compared to determine the aspect ratio of the defect.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a thin film.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of a semiconductor wafer that can be measured with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is an illustration of two different angles of the illumination plane of incident with respect to the defect.



FIG. 4A is an illustration of a side view of a light source being directed across a substrate.



FIG. 4B is an illustration of light beams directed radially across a disk.



FIG. 5 is an illustration of a method to direct a light source along a radial direction.



FIG. 6 is an illustration of directing light along a circumferential direction.



FIG. 7 illustrates a method of directing light along circumferential directions to produce an approximate tangential illumination on a disk.



FIG. 8 is an illustration of an optical setup for an apparatus to detect defects using white light and a CCD camera.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment with a circumferentially directed beam and a radially directed beam.



FIG. 10 is an illustration of the scattered light detection of a particle, pit, and scratch from both the radial and circumferential beams.



FIG. 11 is an illustration of a radial beam used for detecting circumferential scratches.



FIG. 12 is an illustration of a circumferential beam for detecting radial scratches and particles.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to the figures where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Also in the figures, the left most digit of each reference number corresponds to the figure in which the reference number is first used.


One method of detecting particles or defects on substrates such as silicon wafers or magnetic disk media is to shine bright light on the surface of the substrate. The light scattered by particles or defects can then be detected by imaging optics and detectors such as CCD cameras.


It is also desirable to be able to differentiate the type of defects detected. For example, when inspecting textured magnetic disk media, knowing if the scattered light signal from a position on the substrate is from the surface texture or a particle is desirable. This type of information will help the user to pinpoint the source of the defect.


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/444,652 filed on May 22, 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, discloses a system and method for detecting defects on the surface of an object by using a pair of substantially orthogonal directed laser beams, one in the radial and one in the circumferential direction. It also discloses single beam techniques to classify radial and circumferential defects.



FIG. 3 illustrates the scattering of light from an anisotropic defect by varying with the angle of the illumination plane of incidence with respect to the defect. When light is directed towards a surface the amount of light scattered by anisotropic defects such as a scratch 303 depends on the angle between the scratch itself and the plane of incidence of the light source. A light beam 302 whose plane of incidence is nearly perpendicular (as viewed from above the surface) to the scratch line scatters more light than a beam 301 with a plane of incidence that is nearly parallel to the scratch. By contrast, a particle, which is substantially isotropic in shape, will generate scatter from both the radial and circumferential light beam; that is, the amount of light scattered is less dependent on the plane of illumination.


The scratch or texture can be a straight line or a circumferential line (circular). On magnetic disk media, typically the texture line is circumferential (nearly concentric to the disk itself). FIG. 4A shows a side view of a light source 401 being directed across a substrate 402. To obtain a strong scatter signal from these texture line the light beam can be directed from the edge of the disk/substrate 402 toward the center of the disk/substrate 402 (the radial direction).


One method of directing the light beam along radial directions toward the center of the disk 402 is to use a series of beams, e.g., eight beams, which approximate radial illumination on the disk. In other embodiments, more or less beams may be used to cover the surface of the disk. FIG. 4B shows eight beams directed radially toward the center of disk 402. Using this technique, it is not necessary to rotate the disk, only to image it with optics and a CCD camera. This can be done by illuminating with all beams simultaneously or sequentially.


Another method, as illustrated in FIG. 5, is to rotate the disk with respect to the light source 502 or rotate the light source 502 around the disk. The light source is rotated and multiple CCD images are obtained while the light source is in the process of rotation. The process of rotating the light source and obtaining a CCD image are synchronized so that every point on the surface of the wafer or disk is imaged with the CCD while it is being illuminated by the rotating light source.


A CCD camera or another type of detector is placed above the disk to collect the scattered light. The above described illumination technique will preferentially detect scratches which are oriented in the circumferential direction. In order to detect particles or radial scratches it is desired to minimize the signal from the circumferential texture. This may be accomplished by directing the light in the circumferential direction as shown in FIG. 6.


The circumferentially oriented beam 602 will produce only minimal scatter from the circumferential texture and as a result much smaller particles may be detected with a circumferentially oriented beam since the “noise” from the texture is not present. The circumferentially oriented beam will also optimally detect radial scratches and particles 601. One way to obtain the circumferential illumination is shown in FIG. 6. In this case, the disk must be rotated to inspect the entire surface. Another means of producing a circumferential illumination is shown in FIG. 7.


In FIG. 7, a series of eight beams 701a, 701b, 701c, 701d, 701e, 701f, 701g, 701n is shown which produces an approximate tangential illumination on the disk 702. More or less beams may be used to cover the surface of the disk 702. In this case, it is not necessary to rotate the disk 702, only to image it with optics and a CCD camera.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention. White or colored light is directed onto the surface of a substrate from a source 801. The light source 804 can be any source that is capable of producing white or colored light, including tungsten, incandescent or halogen lamp. In the preferred embodiment, a halogen lamp is used as the white or colored light source. Parabolic mirror 802 directs the light rays as quasi-collimated light beams onto the surface of substrate 803. In one embodiment, the beam is directed along a radial direction at a high angle of incidence in order to measure circumferential defects. In another embodiment, the beam is directed along a circumferential direction at a high angle of incidence in order to measure radial defects.


The light intensity from the surface of the substrate scatters up to Fresnel lens 804, which focuses the beams onto a high resolution CCD camera 805. CCD camera 805 captures the image from the scattered light. The CCD camera images the surface feature from the scattered light into pixels on the CCD array. The pixel data from the CCD array is digitized and read by a computer. In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered light image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes an algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.


The optical device shown in FIG. 8 can be arranged so that there are two identical sets of light sources with quasi-collimated white or colored light beams in orthogonal planes of incidence. In an embodiment, the plane of incidence of light beam one 901 is in the circumferential direction and the plane of incidence of light beam two 902 is in the radial direction as shown in FIG. 9. Alternatively, light beam one 901 can be a set of circumferentially orient beams as illustrated in FIG. 7 and described above, and light beam two 902 can be a set of radially oriented beams as illustrated in FIG. 4B and described above. In such an embodiment, it would not be necessary to rotate the disk, only to image it with optics and a CCD camera. The CCD camera 805 (in FIG. 8) will receive scattered light from both circumferential and radial beams, one directional set at a time. The two beams (or sets of beams) can be detected in sequential order—e.g., circumferential beams followed by radial beams, or vice versa. The data may also be taken in parallel, that is, both radial and circumferential beams are on at the same time, although this will result in reduced particle sensitivity. Scratches which are oriented perpendicular to the plane of incidence of the light will generate a strong scatter signal, while those oriented parallel to the plane of incidence will generate substantially no scattered signal. For example, a circumferentially oriented scratch will generate a strong scatter signal when the radial beam (light beam 902 in FIG. 9) crosses it and substantially no scatter when the circumferential beam (light beam 901 in FIG. 9) crosses it. By contrast, a particle which is substantially isotropic in shape will generate scatter from both the radial and circumferential light beams. Since a small particle is substantially isotropic, it will scatter substantially equally when illuminated by the radial or circumferential beam. In the case of a substantially isotropic particle the signals from both beams are substantially equal. In the case of a circumferentially oriented scratch, the radial beam gives a strong signal and the circumferential beam gives substantially no signal. This is because the scratch is strongly anisotropic in its scattering characteristics. That is, a beam whose plane of incidence is oriented perpendicular to the long direction of the scratch scatters much more than a beam whose plane of incidence is parallel to the long direction of the scratch. The ratio of the scattered amplitudes of the scatter light from the radial and circumferential beams will discriminate a pit from a scratch or particle. This is illustrated in FIG. 10 which shows at the top the relative amplitudes of the scattered light of the particle in the radial and circumferential beams. In this case the amplitudes are substantially equal. The middle picture in FIG. 10 shows the amplitudes for a small oval shaped pit. The amplitudes are not equal. The bottom picture in FIG. 10 shows the amplitudes for a circumferentially oriented scratch. In this case the scatter signal comes substantially only from the radial beam. If the scratch were oriented in the radial direction the scatter signal would come substantially from the circumferential beam and substantially none from the radial beam. If the scratch were oriented at 45° to the radial direction then the scattered signal would be equal from both the radial and circumferential beams. It is also possible to orient the planes of the light beams at angles other than 90°. In another embodiment, the orthogonal pair of beams may be oriented at an angle to the radial and circumferential directions. In this manner, one may more easily detect scratches, which lie at directions which are neither radial nor circumferential.


In an embodiment, the apparatus to detect scratches and particles is that shown in FIG. 8. The CCD Camera 805 detects the scatter light image collected from each radius and angle on the disk surface. This data is processed by denoting excursions (above or below) of the data from the local average. The local average is determined by averaging the data for a specified length along a specified orientation such as the radial or circumferential direction. The local average is moved throughout the entire data set and each pixel is compared to the local average. Points, which exceed the specified threshold above or below the local average, are denoted as defects. All the points, which exceed the specified threshold, are put together in a map of the surface showing the locations and amplitude of all the defects. Contiguous or substantially contiguous points on the defect map are classified as a single defect. The amplitude of the scattered light from the radial and the circumferential beams are then compared to determine if the defect is a scratch, particle or pit.


In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for comparing and classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered lighter image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes the above-described algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.


The above embodiments have described optical designs that compare a radial and a circumferentially oriented light beams to determine if a defect is a scratch or a particle. It is also possible to detect and classify a defect as a scratch or a particle by using only a single light beam or a set of light beams oriented in either the radial or circumferential directions. The case of detecting circumferential scratches is shown in FIG. 11. This is accomplished by orienting the plane of incidence of the light source shown in FIG. 8 in the radial direction as indicated by 1102. Alternatively, a set of beams oriented in the radial directions as illustrated in FIG. 4B can be used, in which case it would not be necessary to rotate the disk. In this manner, the circumferential texture scratches 1103 on disk or wafer 1101 will have the maximum amount of scattered light. The amount of scatter from the circumferential texture is typically so great that only large particles may be detected. As a result, much of the information detected by the embodiment described by FIG. 11 is from the circumferential texture. The texture defects are noted by excursions in scattered amplitude that are significantly above the background. The texture defects are separated from the signal for large particles by using an algorithm that measures the aspect ratio of the detected defect. A texture scratch will have a long and thin aspect ratio and a large particle will not.


In an embodiment, the apparatus to detect circumferential scratches and particles is that shown in FIG. 8 with the optical plane of incidence oriented in the radial direction. CCD camera 805 detects the scattered light image from each radius and angle on the disk surface. This data is processed by denoting excursions (above or below) of the data from the local average. The local average is determined by averaging the data for a specified length along a specified orientation such as the radial or circumferential direction. The local average is moved throughout the entire data set and each pixel is compared to the local average. Points, which exceed the specified threshold above or below the local average, are denoted as defects. All the points, which exceed the specified threshold, are put together in a map of the surface showing the locations and amplitudes of all the defects. Contiguous points on the defect map are classified as a single defect. The aspect ratio (length to width ratio) is tested for each unique defect consisting of contiguous points. If the aspect ratio is long and thin then it is classified as a circumferential scratch, if not then a particle. The same process may be applied to the data from a circumferentially oriented head, but in this case, a long aspect ratio means a radial scratch and a short ratio a particle.


In an embodiment of the above-described functions and features for comparing and classifying defects, a computing device with a central processing unit (CPU) is used to process the scattered lighter image data collected from the disk surface. The CPU executes the above-described algorithm to process the images in order to compare and classify the defects. For example, the algorithm can be implemented as a computer program stored on a conventional storage device, in firmware or in hardware.


The case of detecting radial scratches or particles is shown in the embodiment shown in FIG. 12. In this case, the white light source in FIG. 8 is oriented above the disk or wafer 1201 in the circumferential direction 1202 and optimal scatter will come from radial scratches 1203 and particles 1204. Alternatively, a set of beams oriented in the circumferential direction as illustrated in FIG. 7 can be used, in which case it would not be necessary to rotate the disk. The circumferential texture 1103 (in FIG. 11) will have only minimal scatter in this embodiment. The advantage of this design is that it allows optimal measurement of particles and radial scratches since the circumferential texture has only minimal scatter light and hence does not add to the background “noise”.


While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment and various alternate embodiments, it will be understood by persons skilled in the revelant art that various changes in form and details can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method to detect a defect on a surface of an object, comprising: directing a first light beam along a first direction toward a first position on the surface of the object, where the first direction is a radial direction;directing a second light beam along a second direction toward the first position on the surface of the object, where the second direction is a circumferential direction:collecting a portion of the first light beam scattered from the surface of the object;collecting a portion of the second light beam scattered from the surface of the object; andidentifying a defect on the surface of the object using an intensity characteristic of the portions of the first scattered light and the second scattered light collected from the surface.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein directing a first light beam along a first direction toward a first position on the surface of the object comprises directing the first light beam in a radial direction.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein directing a first light beam along a first direction toward a first position on the surface of the object comprises reflecting light from a light source from a parabolic mirror onto the surface of the object.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein collecting a portion of the light scattered from the first position on the object comprises focusing a portion of the reflected light onto a CCD camera.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein identifying a defect on the surface of the object using an intensity characteristic of the portion of the light collected comprises comparing an intensity characteristic of the portion of reflected light focused onto the CCD camera with a local average intensity characteristic.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: rotating the object about a central axis; andcollecting a portion of the light scattered from the surface of the object while the object is rotating.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein: the first light beam is directed toward the surface of the object in a radial direction at a first point in time; andthe second light beam is directed toward the surface of the object in a circumferential direction at a second point in time, different from the first point in time.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining a ratio of an intensity of scattered light reflected from the first light beam to an intensity of scattered light reflected from the second light beam; andusing the ratio to classify a defect on the surface.
  • 9. A system to detect a defect on a surface of an object, comprising: a first light source for directing a first light beam along a first direction toward a first position on the surface of the object, where the first direction is a radial direction;a second light source for directing a second light be am along a second direction toward the first position on the surface of the object, where the second direction is a circumferential direction;an optical assembly to collect portions of the first and second light scattered from the surface of the object;means for identifying a defect on the surface of the object using intensity characteristics of the portions of the first and second light collected from the surface.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the first light source directs the first light beam in a radial direction.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, wherein the first light source utilizes a parabolic mirror to direct light onto the surface of the object.
  • 12. The system of claim 9, further comprising a Fresnel lens to focus a portion of the reflected light onto a CCD camera.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the means for identifying a defect on the surface of the object comprises means for comparing an intensity characteristic of the portion of reflected light focused onto the CCD camera with a local average intensity characteristic.
  • 14. The system of claim 9, further comprising: means for rotating the object about a central axis; andmeans for collecting a portion of the light scattered from the surface of the object while the object is rotating.
  • 15. The system of claim 9 wherein: the first light beam is directed toward the surface of the object in a radial direction at a first point in time; andthe second light beam is directed toward the surface of the object in a circumferential direction at a second point in time, different from the first point in time.
  • 16. The system of claim 9 further comprising: means for determining a ratio of an intensity of scattered light reflected from the first light beam to an intensity of scattered light reflected from the second light beam; andmeans for using the ratio to classify a defect on the surface.
  • 17. A method to detect a defect on a surface of an object, comprising: directing a first plurality of light beams along a plurality of radial directions toward a first position on the surface of the object;directing a second plurality of light beams along a plurality of circumferential directions toward the First position on the surface of the object:collecting a portion of the first and second pluralities of light scattered from the surface of the object; andidentifying a defect on the surface of the object using intensity characteristics of the portions of the first and second pluralities of light collected from the surface.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein collecting a portion of the light scattered from the first position on the object comprises focusing a portion of the reflected light onto a CCD camera.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein identifying a defect on the surface of the object using an intensity characteristic of the portion of the, light collected comprises comparing an intensity characteristic of the portion of reflected light focused onto the CCD camera with a local average intensity characteristic.
  • 20. The method of claim 5, wherein the local average intensity characteristic comprises averaging data for a specified length on the object along a specified orientation, wherein the specified orientation is either radial or circumferential.
  • 21. The method of claim 8, wherein the first light beam is oriented circumferentially and the second light beam is oriented radially.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein using the ratio to classify a defect on the surface comprises using the ratio to discriminate between a first and second defect type, wherein the intensity of the first scatter light and intensity of the second scattered are within a known threshold of each other for the first defect type and outside a known threshold for the second defect type.
  • 23. The method of claim 1 further comprising: directing third through eighth beams along the first direction towards third through eighth positions on the surface of an object, wherein the first direction is within a know threshold of a radial or circumferential orientation.
  • 24. The system of claim 13, wherein the local average intensity characteristic comprises averaging data for a specified length on the object along a specified orientation, wherein the specified orientation is either radial or circumferential.
  • 25. The system of claim 16, wherein means for using the ratio to classify a defect on the surface comprises using the ratio to discriminate between a first and second defect type, wherein the intensity of the first scatter light and the intensity of the second scattered light are within a known threshold of each other for the first defect type and outside a known threshold for the second defect type.
  • 26. The system of claim 9 further comprising: a third through eighth light source for directing a third through eighth beam along the first direction towards third through eighth positions on the surface of the object, wherein the first direction is within a know threshold of a radial or circumferential orientation.
  • 27. The method of claim 19, wherein the local average intensity characteristic comprises averaging data for a specified length on the object along a specified orientation, wherein the specified orientation is either radial or circumferential.
  • 28. The method of claim 17, wherein the plurality of light beams comprises eight light beams.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/269,336, filed Nov. 8, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,218,391 entitled Material Independent Optical Profilometer, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/444,652, entitled Method of Detecting and Classifying Scratches and Particles on Thin Film Disks or Wafers, by Steven W. Meeks, filed May 22, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,357 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/219,632 filed on Aug. 14, 2002, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,500) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/126,154 filed on Apr. 19, 2002, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,765) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/029,957 filed on Dec. 21, 2001, (U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,957) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/861,280 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,757,056) filed on May 18, 2001, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/818,199 filed on Mar. 26, 2001, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/718,054 filed on Nov. 20, 2000 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,749), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/414,388 filed on 7 Oct. 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,665,078), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/347,622 filed on 2 Jul. 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,671), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/136,897 filed on Aug. 19, 1998 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,615), which claims priority from provisional application No. 60/059,740 filed on 22 Sep. 1997 (applicant's reference number 2924), which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (96)
Number Name Date Kind
2593189 Rinia Apr 1952 A
4378159 Galbraith Mar 1983 A
4585348 Chastang Apr 1986 A
4601575 Tamaki Jul 1986 A
4650333 Crabb Mar 1987 A
4794264 Quackenbos et al. Dec 1988 A
4870631 Stoddard Sep 1989 A
4873430 Juliana Oct 1989 A
4905311 Hino et al. Feb 1990 A
4999510 Hayano Mar 1991 A
5017012 Merritt, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5026982 Stroman Jun 1991 A
5067817 Glenn Nov 1991 A
5125741 Okada Jun 1992 A
5168386 Galbraith Dec 1992 A
5189481 Jann et al. Feb 1993 A
5270794 Tsuji Dec 1993 A
5392116 Makosch Feb 1995 A
5416594 Gross et al. May 1995 A
5565979 Gross Oct 1996 A
5604585 Johnson et al. Feb 1997 A
5608527 Valliant et al. Mar 1997 A
5610897 Yamamoto Mar 1997 A
5633747 Nikoonahad May 1997 A
5644562 de Groot Jul 1997 A
5737085 Zollars et al. Apr 1998 A
5798829 Vaez-Iravani Aug 1998 A
5864394 Jordan, III et al. Jan 1999 A
5880838 Marx et al. Mar 1999 A
5883714 Jann et al. Mar 1999 A
5898500 Canteloup et al. Apr 1999 A
5903342 Yatsugake May 1999 A
5963314 Worster et al. Oct 1999 A
5985680 Singhal Nov 1999 A
5986763 Inoue Nov 1999 A
5995226 Abe Nov 1999 A
6020966 Ausschnitt et al. Feb 2000 A
6031615 Meeks Feb 2000 A
6081325 Leslie Jun 2000 A
6091493 Stover et al. Jul 2000 A
6122046 Almogy Sep 2000 A
6130749 Meeks Oct 2000 A
6154280 Borden Nov 2000 A
6169601 Eremin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172752 Haruna et al. Jan 2001 B1
6198533 Meeks Mar 2001 B1
6229610 Meeks May 2001 B1
6268919 Meeks Jul 2001 B1
6392749 Meeks May 2002 B1
6433877 Watanabe et al. Aug 2002 B2
6515745 Vurens et al. Feb 2003 B2
6556290 Maeda et al. Apr 2003 B2
6603541 Lange Aug 2003 B2
6617603 Ishiguro et al. Sep 2003 B2
6624884 Imaino Sep 2003 B1
6624894 Olszak et al. Sep 2003 B2
6665078 Meeks Dec 2003 B1
6678046 Opsal Jan 2004 B2
6687008 Peale Feb 2004 B1
6690473 Stanke et al. Feb 2004 B1
6704435 Imaino Mar 2004 B1
6717671 Meeks Apr 2004 B1
6751044 Meeks Jun 2004 B1
6757056 Meeks et al. Jun 2004 B1
6781103 Lane Aug 2004 B1
6804003 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B1
6813034 Rosencwaig et al. Nov 2004 B2
6917433 Levy et al. Jul 2005 B2
6940609 Scheiner Sep 2005 B2
6956660 Meeks et al. Oct 2005 B2
7019850 Finarov Mar 2006 B2
7023547 Venkatasubbarao et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042556 Sun May 2006 B1
7042577 Jacob et al. May 2006 B1
7046352 Dayal et al. May 2006 B1
7075630 Meeks Jul 2006 B2
7113284 Meeks Sep 2006 B1
7161683 Weitzel Jan 2007 B2
20020015146 Meeks Feb 2002 A1
20020107650 Wack et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118359 Fairley Aug 2002 A1
20020145740 Meeks Oct 2002 A1
20020163634 Meeks Nov 2002 A1
20030025905 Meeks Feb 2003 A1
20030179370 Goldberg et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040017561 Meeks Jan 2004 A1
20040046959 Meeks Mar 2004 A1
20040130710 Hwang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040160604 Meeks Aug 2004 A1
20040169850 Meeks Sep 2004 A1
20040233419 Meeks Nov 2004 A1
20050023491 Young Feb 2005 A1
20050057747 Meeks Mar 2005 A1
20050206888 Yoshida et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060072106 Matsui et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070030493 Zettler et al. Feb 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
4105192 Aug 1991 DE
0080540 Jun 1983 EP
03085514 Apr 1991 JP
07055702 Mar 1995 JP
10325711 Dec 1998 JP
WO9416310 Jul 1994 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060250612 A1 Nov 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60059740 Sep 1997 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10444652 May 2003 US
Child 11269336 US
Parent 09818199 Mar 2001 US
Child 09861280 US
Continuation in Parts (9)
Number Date Country
Parent 11269336 Nov 2005 US
Child 11485798 US
Parent 10219632 Aug 2002 US
Child 10444652 US
Parent 10126154 Apr 2002 US
Child 10219632 US
Parent 10029957 Dec 2001 US
Child 10126154 US
Parent 09861280 May 2001 US
Child 10029957 US
Parent 09718054 Nov 2000 US
Child 09818199 US
Parent 09414388 Oct 1999 US
Child 09718054 US
Parent 09347622 Jul 1999 US
Child 09414388 US
Parent 09136897 Aug 1998 US
Child 09347622 US