1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a device and a method for the optical measurement of an optical system, in particular an optical imaging system, having one or more object-side test optics components to be arranged in front of the optical system to be measured, and/or one or more image-side test optics components to be arranged behind the optical system to be measured, to a container which can be used for such a device, and to a microlithography projection exposure machine equipped with such a device. The designations “object-side” and “image-side” indicate, in the way they are used specifically in the case of optical imaging systems, that the relevant test optics component is intended for positioning in the beam path of a used measuring radiation in front or, respectively, behind the optical system to be measured.
2. Description of the Related Art
Such devices and methods are known in various forms, in particular for measuring optical imaging systems with regard to aberrations. One field of application is the highly accurate determination of aberrations of high-aperture imaging systems such as are used, for example, in microlithography systems for patterning semiconductor components by means of the so-called wavefront detection using shearing interferometry, point diffraction interferometry and other known types of interferometer such as the Ronchi type and Twyman-Green type, or by means of Moiré measuring techniques. In most cases of these techniques, a periodic or wavefront-forming structure is arranged on the object side and imaged by the optical imaging system to be measured, and brought into superimposition or interference with the periodic structure provided on the image side. The interference or superimposition pattern produced can be recorded with the aid of a suitable detector and evaluated in order to adjust and/or qualify the optical imaging system. When the same radiation, for example UV radiation, is used for wavefront measurement as is used by the optical imaging system in its normal operation, it being possible for the measuring device to be integrated in one component with the imaging system, this is also denoted as a so-called system or operational interferometer (OI). A device of this type is disclosed, for example, in laid-open publication DE 101 09 929 A1.
Various methods are known in the literature for increasing the resolution of an optical imaging system, such as reducing the wavelength of the light used in the imaging, and increasing the image-side numerical aperture of the imaging system. The latter is achieved in so-called immersion objectives by using an immersion fluid: see, for example, the projection exposure machines operating with immersion as disclosed in laid-open publications JP 10303114 A and JP 12058436 A.
On the basis of shearing interferometry, such an OI device usually comprises an illuminating mask, also termed coherence mask, and an upstream illuminating optics on the object side, that is to say on the object side of the optical system to be measured, also denoted below as OUT (object under test). Adjoining the OUT on the image side is a diffraction grating, followed by a detector element such as a CCD array, with the optional interposition of imaging optics which project the exit pupil of the OUT onto the detector plane of the detector element. It is mostly the case that the coherence mask is arranged in the object plane, and the diffraction grating is arranged in the image plane of the OUT. In accordance with the spacing conditions to be observed for the optical beam guidance, there are respective interspaces between the object-side last test optics component of the measuring device and the OUT, between the OUT and the image-side first test optics component of the measuring device, and/or between respectively consecutive test optics components on the object side and/or the image side of the OUT.
These interspaces are customarily either open, that is to say in the interspaces the radiation used traverses an atmosphere which corresponds to that of the system neighbourhood, for example air, nitrogen or a vacuum atmosphere, or closed, and are operated or purged with the aid of a prescribed gas atmosphere.
Under these conditions, it is normally possible to use such measuring devices to measure imaging systems up to numerical apertures of the order of magnitude of 0.95. The measurement of objectives of higher numerical aperture of the order of magnitude of 1.0 and above, as in the case of objectives which are used in immersion and near-field lithography, is therefore scarcely possible.
A primary technical problem underlying the invention is to provide a device of the type mentioned at the beginning which, with relatively low outlay, permits even optical imaging systems of very high numerical aperture to be measured, and can be of relatively compact design, to provide a corresponding method and a container suitable for use in such a device, and to provide a microlithography projection exposure machine equipped with such a device.
The invention solves this problem by providing, in various aspects and formulations, a device, a container, a microlithography projection exposure machine, and a method having the features set forth in the independent claims and the description below.
In the device according to the invention, an immersion fluid can be and, in operation, is introduced adjacent to at least one of the one or more object-side test optics components and/or image-side test optics components. By contrast with a beam guidance without an immersion fluid, the beam guidance thereby enabled with the aid of immersion fluid permits the beam aperture angle or beam cross section to be reduced without loss of information in conjunction with an otherwise identical system dimensioning. Consequently, it is possible in this way to measure with sufficient accuracy even optical imaging systems with a very high aperture of the order of magnitude of 1.0 and more, for example using shearing interferometry wavefront detection. Furthermore, this results in the possibility of a very compact design of the measuring device.
In a development of the invention, one or more interspaces are formed between respectively two consecutive object-side test optics components, between respectively two consecutive image-side test optics components, between an object-side last test optics component and the following optical system to be measured, and/or between the optical system and a following, first image-side test optics component, and at least one of the interspaces forms an immersion fluid chamber for introducing immersion fluid. It is possible in this way for an immersion fluid to be introduced into a chamber at any desired point between two test optics components of the measuring device and/or between the optical system to be measured and a neighbouring test optics component.
A development of the invention is directed specifically at an interferometry measuring device which has on the image side in a customary way an interference pattern generating structure and a detector element. At least one immersion fluid chamber is formed between the test component and image-side interference pattern generating structure, and/or between the latter and a following test optics component and/or between the detector element and a preceding test optics component. The use of an immersion fluid between the image-side interference pattern generating structure and detector element permits a reduction in the beam aperture angle between these two test optics components, and a more compact design of the arrangement. In addition, advantages result with regard to the signal-to-noise ratio.
A development of the invention provides an interferometry device for wavefront detection which includes on the object side an interference pattern generating structure and upstream illuminating optics, at least one immersion fluid chamber being formed between the illuminating optics and the object-side interference pattern generating structure and/or between the latter and the test component. This also contributes to the fact that test components with a high aperture of, for example, 1.0 or more, such as projection objectives of microlithography systems, can be measured with the aid of this device without any problem.
In a development of the invention, the device is designed for measurement by means of shearing or point diffraction interferometry.
In a development of the invention, the device is of the dual-pass reflective type as an alternative to a single-pass design, which is also possible. Whereas in the case of the latter the radiation passes through the OUT only once, in the case of the dual-pass type it is directed back through the OUT by an image-side reflector element, and the detection is performed on the object side, that is to say on the same side of the OUT on which the other object-side test optics components, such as an object-side interference pattern generating structure and/or illuminating optics, are located. Such a dual-pass device can be, for example, of the type of a Twyman-Green interferometer.
In a development of the invention, the device comprises a device for continuous or intermittent exchange of immersion fluid, for example in a respective immersion fluid chamber.
In a refinement of the invention, a bellows arrangement, a sealing brush and/or sealing bar arrangement and/or a labyrinth seal arrangement are/is provided as transverse bounding of the respective immersion fluid chamber, which is bounded axially by the two adjacent optical components. Such seals are comparatively easy to implement and can also be used, in particular, in OI arrangements of microlithography projection objectives.
In one advantageous development of the invention, a quantum converter layer and/or at least one lens element and/or at least one liquid droplet are/is arranged on a radiation exit surface of a structure substrate as an image-side test optics component, which, for example, has an interference pattern generating structure. This measure makes it possible to avoid total internal reflection on this radiation exit surface of the structure mount, even for high beam angles, such as those which can occur, for example, in the case of large-aperture objectives to be measured, such as immersion objectives.
In one development of the invention, a fixed arrangement comprising a structure mount and downstream optics, such as a microscope objective or imaging optics, is provided as two image-side test optics components. This makes it easier to adjust these test optics components and, furthermore, contributes to keeping an area in which the optical characteristics are corrected small, thus simplifying the design and production of the microscope objective. If required, this measure can be combined with the fitting (as mentioned above) of one or more lens elements, one or more liquid droplets and/or a quantum converter layer on the radiation exit surface of the structure mount.
In a further refinement, an immersion liquid can be introduced into a space between the optical system to be measured and the structure mount, adjacent to a radiation inlet surface of the structure mount, advantageously combined with the measures mentioned above for arrangement of a quantum converter layer and/or at least one lens element and/or liquid droplet on the radiation exit surface of the structure mount, and/or the fixing of the structure mount and microscope objective relative to one another.
In a further refinement of the invention, an immersion liquid can be introduced into a space between the structure mount and a downstream detector element, for example a CCD array, adjacent to the radiation exit surface of the structure mount. In this case, the detector element or some other test optics component which is adjacent to the immersion liquid may be provided with a protection layer, thus protecting it against the influence of the immersion liquid.
The measures mentioned above for avoidance of total internal reflection advantageously allow multichannel wavefront measurement when required, even for very large aperture objectives, that is to say a parallel, simultaneous measurement on a plurality of measurement channels, that is to say field points, for example by lateral shearing interferometry.
In a development of the invention, a periodic structure used for forming an interference pattern or superimposition pattern is located in a container which is filled for the purpose of measuring with immersion fluid which covers the periodic structure. The container is positioned behind the optical system to be measured in such a way that an exit-end optical element of the optical system makes contact with the immersion fluid. For example, the interspace between the exit-end optical element of the optical system and the periodic structure can be completely filled with the immersion fluid. The container can, for example, be positioned such that the periodic structure lies in the image plane of an imaging system to be measured, or near the same.
In accordance with the invention, a container suitable for use in a device for measuring an optical system has a window inserted in a fluid-tight fashion into a cutout in the container wall. The window can be designed as an associated test optics component with the periodic structure, or the relevant test optics component is positioned in front of the window in the container. With the aid of the window, the interference pattern or superimposition pattern, which is formed, for example, approximately in the plane of the periodic structure, can be observed through the container wall such that an associated detector need not be arranged inside the container, and thus inside the immersion fluid, but can be positioned externally. Alternatively, or in addition to the abovementioned use on the image side, it is also possible to provide a container with an associated object-side test optics component for the purpose of object-side positioning.
In a refinement of the container, the window is made from fluorescing material. This permits a visualization of the radiation or the interference pattern or superimposition pattern even in cases in which operation is performed with invisible radiation, for example with UV radiation. In the case of the use of the Moiré measuring technique, this measure can render it possible for the detector to access the aperture of the Moiré strips more easily.
In an advantageous development of the invention, the said device has a container of the type according to the invention.
A device developed further in accordance with the invention serves for measuring optical systems by means of Moiré measurement technology. For this purpose, there is arranged in front of the optical system a periodic structure which generates a Moiré superimposition pattern with the image-side periodic structure. Normally, for this purpose the periodic structure on the image side, that is to say behind the optical system, is identical to or at least very similar to that on the object side, that is to say in front of the optical system, and the scale ratio of the two structures corresponds to that of the magnification ratio of the optical imaging system under test. The evaluation of the generated Moiré superimposition pattern can provide information on distortions and further aberrations of the optical system.
In an advantageous design of the device, the container is open at the top, and the opening is dimensioned such that when the container is positioned below the exit-end optical element of the optical system, a gap remains between this element and the container wall. For the purpose of adjustment and/or measurement, the container, and thus the periodic structure, can be moved by this gap using a suitable positioning device in any desired spatial directions relative to the exit-end element of the optical system. The gap also permits direct access to the immersion fluid, for example in order to eliminate disturbances to the beam path as a consequence of striations, gas bubbles or heat.
The measuring device according to the invention is integrated in the microlithography projection exposure machine according to the invention. In this case, the exposure machine can be, in particular, one of the customary types of scanner or stepper. The integrated measuring device can be used to measure a projection objective of the exposure machine in situ, that is to say there is no need for dismantling.
The method according to the invention can be carried out, in particular, with the aid of the device according to the invention.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings and described below. In the drawings:
The device illustrated in
On the object-side of the objective 1 to be measured, the measuring device includes an illuminating module 2 of which there are shown an illuminating lens 2a and a following coherence mask 2b which functions as an object-side interference pattern generating structure. On the image side of the objective 1, the measuring device has a diffraction grating 3, functioning as an image-side interference pattern generating structure, a following micro-objective 4 and a detector element 5 downstream of the latter. The micro-objective 4 and detector element 5 are held in a ring holder 6.
The coherence mask 2b is in the object plane of the objective 1. As indicated by a movement arrow B, the diffraction grating 3 is arranged such that it moves laterally in the image plane of the objective 1. The coherence mask 2b and the diffraction grating 3 are provided with suitable structures for wavefront detection by means of shearing interferometry, as is known per se.
The micro-objective projects the pupil of the objective 1 onto the detector element 5, which is implemented as a CCD array of an imaging camera, for example. The shearing interferometry interference patterns picked up by the detector element 5 are evaluated in an evaluation unit (not shown) for determining the imaging behaviour and/or the aberrations, i.e. imaging errors, or wave aberrations in a conventional way.
In this respect, the device is of a conventional type and therefore requires no further explanations. Apart from these conventional measures, it is provided that one or more of the interspaces existing between the optical components used are delimited in a fluid-tight fashion by means forming a fluid chamber such that it can be filled with an immersion fluid.
For this purpose, in the example shown in
Moreover, the ring holder 6 forms a part of the means forming the fluid chamber, by virtue of the fact that it radially bounds the interspace between the micro-objective 4 and detector element 5 in a fluid-tight fashion with the formation of a further immersion fluid chamber 8e.
Filling the immersion fluid chambers 8a to 8e with a respectively suitable immersion fluid influences the beam path such that the respective aperture angle and the beam cross section are reduced in conjunction with an otherwise identical system dimensioning, as follows from the edge beam path 9 shown diagrammatically in
In alternative embodiments, only one, two, three or four of the five immersion fluid chambers 8a to 8e shown in
The introduction of an immersion fluid into the chamber 8f between the diffraction grating 3 and detector element 5 is particularly advantageous in the case of the variant of
In the example shown, an immersion fluid with a refractive index greater than that of the diffraction grating substrate 3 is selected, with the consequence that the aperture angle of the radiation is smaller after exit from the diffraction grating substrate 3 than in the latter. Alternatively, immersion fluids with a lower refractive index than that of the diffraction grating substrate 3 can be used, as is illustrated in the example of
A further advantage of introducing an immersion fluid into the immersion fluid chambers formed precisely in the image-side part of the measuring device consists in that the signal-to-noise ratio and thus the measuring accuracy can be improved, since the detected intensity of image points in the edge region decreases with the fourth power of the cosine of the aperture angle.
In a view corresponding to
As a further difference from the exemplary embodiment of
In an illustration similar to
In the examples shown, it becomes clear that owing to the introduction of immersion fluid between the objective 1 and the image-side grating 3 it is possible for the field area defined by the numerical aperture of the objective 1 to be imaged completely even in the case of very high aperture values, and that a high resolving power is achieved when the measuring device is installed as an OI device at the place of use of the objective 1, for example in a projection exposure machine of a microlithography system. In normal operation, during the exposure process a wafer to be exposed, for example with photoresist, is located in the image plane, and so the OI device can advantageously be installed in a stepper or scanner, the immersion fluid chamber corresponding to and even promoting the conditions of use for the latter. Filling one or more of the object-side interspaces, such as the interspace between the object-side interference pattern generating structure 2b, where, for example, a reticle is located when the objective 1 is in use, and the objective 1 permits the objective to be designed with smaller lens diameters.
In addition to introducing immersion fluid in front of the micro-objective 4, 4a, the latter is designed such that it is suitable for testing objectives 1 with numerical apertures of up to approximately 0.9, since its numerical aperture must be greater than or equal to that of the OUT 1 if, as desired, the entire objective pupil is to be measured. Moreover, it is possible for the very first time in this way also to measure objectives with numerical apertures of greater than approximately 0.95 or even greater than 1.0 with relatively low outlay by using this technique. If required, an immersion fluid can also be located in the micro-objective 4, 4a between optical components of the same.
In a view corresponding to
The second pinhole mask 3a, positioned in the image plane or, alternatively, in the vicinity of the image plane of the objective 1, has a second pinhole, in order to generate a spherical reference wave by diffraction. The radiation for generating the reference wave originates from the imaging by the objective 1 of the first or second of the spherical waves supplied by the beam-splitting diffraction grating 15, which are represented diagrammatically in
Apart from the pinhole, the second, image-side pinhole mask 3a has, as is usual in the case of point diffraction interferometers, a second, larger opening for the free passage of the OUT wave. The result of this on the detection plane of the detector element 5 is the coherent superimposition of reference wave and OUT wave, and the resulting interference pattern can be detected by the detector element 5 in a spatially resolving fashion, and be evaluated in the usual way by means of a downstream evaluation unit. The phase shift mentioned is advantageous here, but not necessary in principle, since the relative tilting of OUT and reference waves results in multiple fringe inter-ferograms from which the phase shift can be calculated with the aid of multiple fringe evaluation methods.
Characteristic, in turn, of the device of
Whereas the above exemplary embodiments described measuring devices of the single-pass type, in the case of which the test radiation is led only once through the OUT,
The radiation fraction reflected by the beam splitter 19 is focused by following focusing optics 20 into the object plane of the OUT 1, in order to provide a spherical test wave there. A spherical concave mirror 21 is arranged on the image side in such a way that its centre of curvature lies in the image plane of the OUT 1. Consequently, the radiation emerging on the image side from the OUT 1 is retroreflected through the latter again by the spherical concave mirror 21. In the ideal case, that is to say given perfect adjustment and without defects in the component parts, the outward and returning paths of the wave are identical. In general, with such dual-pass arrangements the reflecting surfaces are spherically curved, that is to say formed by concave or convex glass or mirror members, since the beam path is convergent at the exit end in the case of imaging objectives to be measured. The radiation then passes via the focusing optics 20 and the beam splitter 19 onto the detector plane of a detector element 5a which is arranged behind the beam splitter 19 and can be an image recording camera, for example. In addition, the reference radiation retroreflected by the reference system part 19 and deflected through 90° by the beam splitter 19 passes to the detector element 5a and interferes with the radiation which has passed twice through the OUT 1, as is usual in the case of the design of the Twyman-Green interferometer.
Characteristically, one immersion fluid chamber 8b, 8c is respectively formed by means of respective bellows 7b, 7c, alternatively, by means of one or the other, abovementioned sealing variants, on the object side and image side in a fashion adjacent to the OUT 1, that is to say on the object side between the focusing optics 20 and the entrance-end objective lens 1a, and on the image side between the exit-end objective lens 1c and the spherical concave mirror 21. The abovementioned properties and advantages of filling these interspaces with an immersion fluid are obtained, once again.
The device shown in
The device also comprises an object-side test optics component 32, which is preferably to be positioned in the object plane of the projection objective and has a periodic structure 32a which is designed in this example as a Moiré pattern, typically with periodic Moiré strips.
The device also includes a container 34 which is to be positioned on the image side and can be filled with an immersion fluid 35 and has an upper cover 41 on the edge side into which a sufficiently large opening is let, through which the exit-end element 30 of the projection objective can pass, a movement gap 39 remaining between the opening edge and the penetrating optical element 30.
A further periodic structure 36, which is likewise designed as a Moiré pattern, is mounted on a window 37 which is inserted in a fluid-tight fashion in a cutout which is provided in a base wall 43 of the container 34. Alternatively, the image-side Moiré pattern 36 can also be positioned above and therefore in front of the window 37 on a carrier element fitted in the container 34, for example on a carrier plate. The window 37 can optionally be made from a fluorescing material which, in the event of use of a non-visible radiation such as UV radiation, permits the latter and/or the interference pattern or superimposition pattern to be visualized.
The device shown can be used to measure the projection objective with a low outlay at its operating site without the need for this purpose to remove it from the microlithography projection exposure machine. For this purpose, the object-side Moiré pattern 32a is brought into its desired object-side position, for example by inserting it into the beam path with the aid of a reticle holder in exchange for a reticle in the object plane which is used in normal operation. The container 34 is correspondingly filled with immersion fluid 35 such that the latter covers the Moiré pattern 36, and is positioned on the image side at a suitable point, for example in the image plane of the projection objective. This can be performed, for example, with the aid of a wafer holder which is used in normal operation to position a wafer to be exposed in the image plane. In other words, by exchanging the said components the microlithography projection exposure machine can easily be switched over from normal operation, that is to say the imaging of a reticle positioned in the object plane onto a wafer positioned in the image plane, to measurement operation. In the measurement operation position shown, the exit-end element 30 of the projection objective dips into the immersion fluid 35, that is to say the latter fills the interspace between the said objective and the image-side Moiré pattern 36.
In the measurement operation shown, the object-side Moiré pattern 32a is imaged by the projection objective onto the image-side Moiré pattern 36, such that superimposition of the image of the object-side Moiré pattern 32a and the image-side Moiré pattern 36 produces a Moiré superimposition pattern which is observed through the window 37 with the aid of a detector 38. In a way familiar to the person skilled in the art, aberrations, in particular distortion errors, of the projection objective are detected by appropriate evaluation of the Moiré superimposition pattern.
Depending on requirement, the movement gap 39 permits a movement of the container 34 in all spatial directions for the purposes of adjustment or measurement, for example a lateral and/or axial displacement, a tilting and/or rotation such that the container 34, and thus the associated Moiré pattern 36, can be positioned optimally for the measurement operation. The movement or positioning of the container 34 is accomplished by a suitably fitted and designed positioning unit 42. In addition, it is optionally possible for the object-side and/or image-side Moiré pattern 32a, 36 to be subjected to expansion, contraction or rotation in order to obtain a Moiré strip superimposition pattern which can be effectively evaluated, and/or to compensate aberrations of the projection objective partially in advance.
The movement gap 39 also permits direct access to the immersion fluid 35, and this permits the elimination of disturbing influences exerted by the latter on the measurement operation, such as striations, gas bubbles or thermal effects.
It goes without saying that the device shown is suitable for measuring not only a projection objective, but also any other desired optical imaging systems and other optical systems by means of Moiré measurement technology. The invention also comprises devices which are based on other conventional measuring techniques for determining aberrations of optical imaging systems and which make use of a periodic structure to be arranged on the object side and/or image side, in order to generate a superimposition pattern or interference pattern indicating aberrations. The invention is suitable for all normally used radiation wavelengths, such as for the use of an He—Ne laser at 632.8 nm, and other light sources such as are customary in lithography, in particular including those in the UV wavelength region and EUV wavelength region between 10 nm and 300 nm.
In all the exemplary embodiments shown, the immersion fluid can be introduced in a stationary fashion into the relevant immersion fluid chamber or the container, or alternatively, the respective immersion fluid chamber is flushed or refilled continuously or periodically with the immersion fluid. It is possible in this way to avoid any kind of disruptive effect owing to heating of the immersion fluid, and/or to achieve temperature control, for example cooling, of the adjacent optical components. Suitable conventional means are then provided for this purpose, in particular an inlet 22a and an outlet 22b into or from the immersion fluid chamber 8c, as shown in
Specifically,
This compact configuration of the detector part is suitable, for example, for an OI device which operates on the principle of parallel, that is to say multichannel, lateral shearing interferometry, and which is able to measure optical systems, in particular with respect to the aberrations which correspond to the Zernike coefficients Z2 to Z37, with in-line calibration preferably being provided. This detector configuration is also particularly suitable for measurement of objects with a very high numerical aperture NA, for example NA>1, as occurs, for example, in the case of so-called immersion objectives, whose design includes an immersion liquid.
In a situation such as this, unless further measures are taken, there is a risk of total internal reflection occurring on the radiation exit surface of the structure mount 53 owing to the high beam angles which occur, as is illustrated in
Quantum converter layers of this type, for example fluorescent/luminescent layers, are known per se to those skilled in the art and are frequently applied, for example, to a CCD chip for the purpose of appropriate quantum conversion, so that they do not require any further explanation here. In the present case, the quantum converter layer 54 is located on the lower face, that is to say the radiation exit surface, of the structure mount 53, and the interferogrammes to be detected are produced in the quantum converter layer 54. The CCD array 55 is positioned at a sufficiently short distance, preferably of <10 μm, behind the quantum converter layer 54, in order to minimize striation of the radiation emitted from the quantum converter layer 54 into the entire hemisphere and thus of the interferogrammes to be detected on the CCD array 55. Alternatively, the CCD array 55 may be arranged in direct touching contact with the quantum converter layer 54, that is to say the substrate mount 53, the quantum converter layer 54 and the CCD chip 55 then form a sandwich structure.
It is self-evident that the measures mentioned above relating to the individual
The measures explained above with reference to
Once again, an immersion liquid 52a is introduced into the beam path upstream of the structure mount 53a, adjacent to its radiation inlet surface, although this is indicated only schematically in
Precise lateral and vertical adjustment of the microscope objective 57a relative to the structure mount 53a with the associated interference pattern production structure is of considerable importance for the measurement process, in particular for an OI measurement. The rigid mechanical coupling of these two components 53a, 57a by means of the holder 58 fixes the adjustment parameters, thus avoiding changes to these parameters. The fixing of the structure mount 53a and microscope objective 57a relative to one another also makes it possible to keep small specific design parameters, such as the area of sine correction, thus simplifying the design, production and manufacture of the microscope objective 57a.
As an alternative to the example illustrated in
The liquid droplet 60 acts as a liquid lens, and with this function replaces the wrung-on lens element 56a in the example in
The various embodiments which have been explained above with reference to
As the exemplary embodiments shown and described above make plain, the invention makes available a device with the aid of which it is also possible to optically measure very accurately optical imaging systems having a very high numerical aperture, for example with the aid of wave front measurement by means of shearing interferometry or point diffraction interferometry. The device can be used, in particular, in the case of projection objectives in microlithography systems, such as those of the scanner or stepper type, as an OI arrangement for wavefront detection, or as a Moiré measuring arrangement, it being possible to integrate it into the lithography system itself, if necessary. It goes without saying that the measuring device according to the invention can also be used for the optical measurement of any other optical imaging systems with the use of interferometric or other conventional measurement techniques, in particular for spatially resolved measurement over the entire pupil area with a high numerical aperture.
By using immersion, for example for the formation of one or more immersion fluid chambers in one or more interspaces, traversed by the measuring optical radiation, between optical components of the measuring device and/or between the OUT and respectively adjacent test optics components, it is possible to reduce the aperture angle or the beam cross section of the measuring radiation, and the measuring device can be of compact design. Although the formation of immersion fluid chambers or the use of a container for the immersion fluid is generally advantageous, it is not mandatory. However, the invention also comprises embodiments in the case of which the immersion fluid is introduced without an immersion fluid chamber formed specifically therefor, and without a container provided specifically therefor. To be specific, the immersion fluid may be introduced adjacent to at least one of the one or more object-side and/or image-side test optics components, so that the guidance of the radiation through the immersion fluid is influenced in a desired way.
The above description of the preferred embodiments has been given by way of example. From the disclosure given, those skilled in the art will not only understand the present invention and its attendant advantages, but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the structures and methods disclosed. It is sought, therefore, to cover all changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 61 775 | Dec 2002 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/147,034, filed Jun. 26, 2008, now abandoned, which is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/080,525, filed on Mar. 16, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,408,652, issued Aug. 5, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of International Application PCT/EP2003/014663, with an international filing date of Dec. 19, 2003, which was published under PCT Article 21(2) in English, and the disclosure of which is incorporated into this application by reference; the following disclosure is additionally based on German Patent Application No. 102 61 775.9 filed on Dec. 20, 2002, which is also incorporated into this application by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4418984 | Wysocki et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4465368 | Matsuura et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4562671 | Bouillon et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4965630 | Kato et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5331369 | Terasawa et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5384573 | Turpin | Jan 1995 | A |
5448332 | Sakakibara et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452583 | Schulte | Sep 1995 | A |
5493403 | Nishi | Feb 1996 | A |
5528118 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5623853 | Novak et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5646413 | Nishi | Jul 1997 | A |
5677525 | Volcker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5798838 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5867319 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874820 | Lee | Feb 1999 | A |
5883704 | Nishi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5925887 | Sakai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5969441 | Loopstra et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002467 | Nishi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013401 | McCullough et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6208407 | Loopstra | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239909 | Hayashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6281967 | Kudo | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292255 | McCullough | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292608 | Toh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312373 | Ichihara | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337162 | Irie | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341007 | Nishi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6400441 | Nishi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6448568 | Allen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6549269 | Nishi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563565 | Nishi | May 2003 | B2 |
6563567 | Komatsuda et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6590634 | Nishi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6627365 | Shiraishi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650399 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6730925 | Ozawa | May 2004 | B1 |
6771350 | Nishinaga | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785006 | Nishida | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788477 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6940582 | Tanaka | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961115 | Harnatani et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7130037 | Lange | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7213963 | Lof et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221431 | Ohsaki | May 2007 | B2 |
7227616 | Graeupner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7301607 | Hazelton et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7408652 | Wegmann et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486380 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7623218 | Wegmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7760366 | Mengel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7796274 | Mengel et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010041297 | Nishi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043320 | Kato et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001088 | Wegmann et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020033934 | Ishii | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041377 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061469 | Tanaka | May 2002 | A1 |
20020101574 | Tsuji | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118370 | Nishida | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145717 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159040 | Harnatani et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167642 | Jones et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187406 | Magome et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025890 | Nishinaga | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030916 | Suenaga | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224295 | Heerens et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090606 | Ishikawa | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118184 | Violette | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169834 | Richter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040169924 | Flagello et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180294 | Baba-Ali et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180299 | Rolland et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224265 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224525 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227923 | Flagello et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233405 | Kato et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20041022452 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | |
20040253547 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253548 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257544 | Vogel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259008 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259040 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263808 | Sewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002004 | Kolesnychenko et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007570 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018156 | Mulkens et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030498 | Mulkens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030506 | Schuster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030511 | Auer-Jongepier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036121 | Hoogendam et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036183 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036184 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036213 | Mann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037269 | Levinson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041225 | Sengers et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042554 | Dierichs et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048220 | Mertens et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048223 | Pawloski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068639 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073670 | Carroll | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078286 | Dierichs et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078287 | Sengers et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084794 | Meagley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088635 | Hoogendam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094114 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094119 | Loopstra et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050099635 | Kakuchu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100745 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117224 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122497 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134815 | Van Santen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141098 | Schuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145265 | Ravkin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145803 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146693 | Ohsaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146695 | Kawakami | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147920 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153424 | Coon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050158673 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164502 | Deng et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174549 | Duineveld et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175940 | Dierichs | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185269 | Epple et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190435 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050190455 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205108 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213061 | Hakey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213072 | Schenker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217135 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217137 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219481 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219482 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219499 | Zaal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225737 | Weissenrieder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231694 | Kolesnychenko et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233081 | Tokita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237501 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243292 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050243328 | Wegmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245005 | Benson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253090 | Gau et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259232 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259233 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259236 | Straaijer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264778 | Lof et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270505 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007418 | Hamatani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060103832 | Hazelton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060170891 | Nishinaga et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176457 | Ishii et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192093 | Kok et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060274297 | Ogusu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285100 | Hamatani et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070132971 | Sengers et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132979 | Lof et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080144043 | Wegmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180688 | Mengel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080252876 | Mengel et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090021726 | Wegmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090109418 | Hazelton et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224 448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
44 15 003 | Jun 1995 | DE |
44 01 978 | Jul 1995 | DE |
101 099 29 | Nov 2001 | DE |
100 65 127 | Aug 2002 | DE |
1 500 982 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 510 870 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1510870 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 662 554 | May 2006 | EP |
1 670 039 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1670039 | Jun 2006 | EP |
A-59-19912 | Feb 1982 | JP |
57-117238 | Jul 1982 | JP |
A 57-153433 | Sep 1982 | JP |
A-58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-226317 | Dec 1984 | JP |
A-62-65326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
A-1-6560 | Mar 1992 | JP |
A-4-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A-4-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A-5-662877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
A-5-53120 | Feb 1994 | JP |
A-6-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
A-6-188169 | Jul 1994 | JP |
A-5-283403 | Oct 1994 | JP |
A-7-176468 | Jul 1995 | JP |
A-7-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
A-8-1666475 | Jun 1996 | JP |
A-8-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
A-8-316133 | Nov 1996 | JP |
A-8-330224 | Dec 1996 | JP |
A-09-184787 | Jul 1997 | JP |
A-10-160582 | Jun 1998 | JP |
A-10-163099 | Jun 1998 | JP |
A-63-157419 | Jun 1998 | JP |
A-10-189427 | Jul 1998 | JP |
A-10-214783 | Aug 1998 | JP |
103 03 114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
A-10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
A-10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
A-11-16816 | Jan 1999 | JP |
A-11-135400 | May 1999 | JP |
A-11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
A-11-194479 | Jul 1999 | JP |
A-11-238680 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-297615 | Oct 1999 | JP |
A-2000-12453 | Jan 2000 | JP |
A-2000-29202 | Jan 2000 | JP |
120 58 436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
A-2000-58436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
A-2000-097616 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-505958 | May 2000 | JP |
A-2000-315648 | Nov 2000 | JP |
A-2001-144004 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-022606 | Jan 2002 | JP |
A-2002-14005 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-071513 | Mar 2002 | JP |
A-2002-071513 | Mar 2002 | JP |
A-2002-071514 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-100561 | Apr 2002 | JP |
A-2002-250678 | Sep 2002 | JP |
A-2002-296005 | Oct 2002 | JP |
A-2004-301825 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-79587 | Mar 2005 | JP |
A-2005-92948 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007-527611 | Sep 2007 | JP |
1998-032589 | Jul 1998 | KR |
2001-0034274 | Apr 2001 | KR |
890067 | Dec 1981 | SU |
977942 | Nov 1982 | SU |
WO 9824115 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9828665 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9900689 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9934255 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9949366 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9950712 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 9960361 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9966370 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0108205 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0163233 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02063664 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02090905 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02091078 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057295 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057295 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004077154 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081666 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005001432 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005001572 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003864 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005006026 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005008339 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013008 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005015283 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005017625 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005019935 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022266 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024325 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005050324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054953 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054955 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059617 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059618 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059645 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059654 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062128 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064400 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064405 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069055 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069078 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069081 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005071491 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074606 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076084 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081030 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081067 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098504 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098505 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098506 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106589 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005111689 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005111722 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005119368 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2005119369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090257049 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12147034 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 12489639 | US | |
Parent | 11080525 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12147034 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP03/14663 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11080525 | US |