1. Field
This application relates to masking fabrication, such as using masks in the fabrication of solar cells.
2. Related Art
During various fabrication stages of solar cells, it may be desired to use masks so as to block parts of the solar cells from the particular fabrication process. For example, masks may be used for formation of contacts or for edge exclusion to preventing shunting of the cell. That is, for cells having contacts on the front and back sides, materials used for making the contacts may be deposited on the edges of the wafer and shunt the front and back contacts. Therefore, it is advisable to use mask to exclude the edges of the cell during fabrication of at least the front or back contacts.
As another illustration, for the fabrication of silicon solar cells, it is desirable to deposit blanket metals on the back surface to act as light reflectors and electrical conductors. The metal is typically aluminum, but the blanket metals could be any metal used for multiple reasons, such as cost, conductivity, solderability, etc. The deposited film thickness may be very thin, e.g., about 10 nm up to very thick, e.g., 2-3 um. However, it is necessary to prevent the blanket metal from wrapping around the edge of the silicon wafer, as this will create a resistive connection between the front and back surfaces of the solar cell, i.e., shunting. To prevent this connection, an exclusion zone on the backside edge of the wafer can be created. The typical dimension of the exclusion zone is less than 2 mm wide, but it is preferable to make the exclusion as thin as possible.
One way to create this exclusion zone is through the use of a mask; however, using masks has many challenges. Due to the highly competitive nature of the solar industry, the mask must be very cheap to manufacture. Also, due to the high throughputs of solar fabrication equipment (typically 1500-2500 cells per hour), the mask must be quick and easy to use in high volume manufacturing. Also, since the mask is used to prevent film deposition on certain parts of the wafer, it must be able to absorb and accommodate deposition build up. Furthermore, since film deposition is done at elevated temperatures, the mask must be able to function properly at elevated temperature, e.g., up to 350° C., while still accurately maintaining the exclusion zone width, while accommodating substrate warpage due to thermal stresses.
The following summary is included in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects and features of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention and as such it is not intended to particularly identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented below.
Embodiments of the invention solve the above problems of using masks, by using a dual-mask arrangement. The two part masking system is configured for masking semiconductor wafers, and includes an inner mask consisting of a flat metal sheet having apertures exposing the parts of the wafer that are to be processed; and, an outer mask configured for placing over and masking the inner mask, the outer mask having an opening cut of size and shape similar to the size and shape of the wafer, the outer mask having thickness larger than thickness of the inner mask. A mask frame may be configured to support the inner and outer masks, such that the outer mask is sandwiched between the mask frame and the inner mask. In one example, where the dual-mask arrangement is used for edge isolation, the opening cut in the inner mask is of size slightly smaller than the wafer, so that when the inner mask is placed on the wafer it covers peripheral edge of the wafer, and the opening cut in the outer mask is slightly smaller than the opening cut in of the inner mask. A top frame carrier may be used to hold the inner and outer mask and affix the inner and outer masks to the wafer susceptor.
An upper or outer mask may be made from thin, e.g., about 0.03″, aluminum, steel or other similar material, and is configured to mate with a substrate carrier. An inner mask is made from a very thin, e.g., about 0.001 to 0.003″, flat steel sheet, or other magnetic materials, and is configured to be nested within the outer mask.
According to further embodiments, arrangement for supporting wafers during processing is provided, comprising: a wafer carrier or susceptor having a raised frame, the raised frame having a recess for supporting a wafer around periphery of the wafer and confining the wafer to predetermined position; an inner mask configured for placing on top of the raised frame, the inner mask having an aperture arrangement configured to mask part of the wafer and expose remaining part of the wafer; and an outer mask configured for placing over the raised frame on top of the inner mask, the outer mask having a single opening configured to partially cover the inner mask. A top frame carrier may be used to hold the inner and outer mask and affix the inner and outer masks to the wafer susceptor.
Magnets are located in the susceptor and alternate N-S-N-S-N completely around the frame or completely below the entire surface of the susceptor and directly under the wafer. The outer and inner masks are designed to be held to the frame by magnetic forces only, so as to enable easy and fast loading and unloading of substrates.
The mask assembly is removable from the wafer carrier and support frame to load the substrate into the carrier. Both the outer and inner masks are lifted as part of the mask assembly. Once the wafer is located on the carrier in the wafer pocket, the mask assembly is lowered back down onto the carrier. The inner mask overlaps the top surface of the wafer. The magnets in the carrier frame pull the inner mask down into intimate contact with the substrate. This forms a tight compliant seal on the edge of the wafer. The outer mask is designed in order to prevent deposition on the thin compliant inner mask. As explained above, the deposition process might cause the inner mask to heat, causing the mask to warp and loose contact with the wafer. If the mask looses contact with the wafer the metal film will deposit in the exclusion zone on the surface of the substrate wafer. The pocket and friction force created by the magnets keep the substrate and mask from moving relative to each other during transport and deposition, and the outer mask prevents film deposition on the inner mask and prevents the inner mask from warping.
The mask assembly can be periodically removed from the system with the carrier by use of a vacuum carrier exchange. The carrier exchange is a portable vacuum enclosure with carrier transport mechanism. It allows the carriers to be exchanged “on the fly” without stopping the continuous operation of the system.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, exemplify the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain and illustrate principles of the invention. The drawings are intended to illustrate major features of the exemplary embodiments in a diagrammatic manner. The drawings are not intended to depict every feature of actual embodiments nor relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and are not drawn to scale.
While in traditional semiconductor manufacturing wafers are generally processed independently, in solar fabrication multiple wafers are fabricated simultaneously. For simplicity, the following will be described with respect to processing of three wafers simultaneously; however, it should be appreciated that the embodiments may be extended to any number of wafers being processed simultaneously.
The carrier 100 of
When processing of the wafers requires the use of masks, the masks may be placed individually on top of each wafer, or one mask may be formed to cover all three wafers simultaneously. The mask may be held in place using, e.g., magnets. However, for accurate processing the mask must be made very thin, and consequently may deform due to thermal stresses during processing. Additionally, a thin mask may collect deposits rapidly and the deposits may interfere with the accurate placing and masking of the mask. Therefore, it would be advantageous to use the dual-mask arrangement according to the embodiments disclosed below.
Referring to
Each of single-wafer carriers 205 has a base 230 (visible in
In
Turning back to
In the embodiments described above with reference to
According to the above embodiments, the inner mask establishes an intimate gap free contact with the substrate. The outer mask protects the inner mask, the carrier and the frame from deposited material. In the embodiments illustrated, the outer and inner mask openings are in a pseudo-square shape, suitable for applications to mono-crystalline solar cells during edge shunt isolation process. During other processes the inner mask has a certain apertures arrangement, while the outer mask has the pseudo-square shaped aperture. Pseudo-square shape is a square with its corners cut according to a circular ingot from which the wafer was cut. Of course, if poly-crystalline square wafers are used, the outer and inner mask openings would be square as well.
As can be understood from the embodiments described above, the inner magnetic mask should be thin so it is flexible and will conform to the substrate surface. The substrate holder can be a frame, an electrostatic chuck, a flat plate, etc., as long as it has magnets imbedded under the substrate to hold the inner mask in contact with the substrate. The magnets would be along the mask opening for an open area mask, such as one that only masks the outer edge of a wafer for edge isolation. For a mask with holes over the substrate's surface, the magnets would be in an array under the mask over the entire area of the mask. The dual-mask arrangement could be used for various processes, such as, e.g., deposition, implantation, RIE processing, etc. For instance a touch panel could be made by blanket deposition of ITO followed by a RIE process to pattern the ITO thru a mask.
While this invention has been discussed in terms of exemplary embodiments of specific materials, and specific steps, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that variations of these specific examples may be made and/or used and that such structures and methods will follow from the understanding imparted by the practices described and illustrated as well as the discussions of operations as to facilitate modifications that may be made without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority benefit from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/635,804, filed Apr. 19, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/639,052, filed Apr. 26, 2012, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3498711 | Ables | Mar 1970 | A |
3775644 | Cotner et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4475223 | Taniguchi et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4599970 | Peterson | Jul 1986 | A |
4699555 | Guarino | Oct 1987 | A |
4913789 | Aung | Apr 1990 | A |
4915057 | Boudreau et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4915564 | Eror et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5164974 | Kariya et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5567267 | Kazama et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5688389 | Bjornard et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5846328 | Aruga et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5993614 | Nomura | Nov 1999 | A |
6083566 | Whitesell | Jul 2000 | A |
6084494 | Chew et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6146489 | Wirth | Nov 2000 | A |
6251232 | Aruga et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6291114 | Reijers | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6475287 | Clark | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6589382 | Clark et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7429300 | Kido et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7785663 | Kido et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8349196 | Fairbairn et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378318 | Gammel et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
9082799 | Weaver et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020011406 | Shishido et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020179013 | Kido et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187265 | Mori et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030074097 | Mautz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030087471 | Shtein | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108805 | Clark | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030221614 | Kang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040020435 | Tsuchiya et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037732 | Shiga et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049308 | Evers | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040115342 | Shigemura | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040168634 | Mori et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050034673 | Kim | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050232734 | Elliott et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060150910 | Han et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187431 | Shibazaki | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201618 | Kang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060266718 | Tischner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009671 | Manz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080299296 | Kido et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016857 | Nakamura | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017192 | Matsuura | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090145879 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179651 | Elgar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185892 | Aburatani | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194026 | Burrows et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250574 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291610 | Sasaki | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090324379 | He | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003768 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100092668 | Hegedus | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111650 | Quach et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120233 | He | May 2010 | A1 |
20100296903 | Shah et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110075145 | Dohse | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110141448 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174217 | Gersdorff et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110207261 | Watai | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234344 | Fullerton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120006257 | Higashisaka et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120048186 | Bruning et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120170999 | Sakaue | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120199477 | Uenosono | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130071208 | Hosek | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130176691 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130287526 | Bluck et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150170947 | Bluck et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160042913 | Adibi et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1662978 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1818719 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1861833 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101864552 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102165095 | Aug 2011 | CN |
104582863 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104685095 | Jun 2015 | CN |
102008037387 | Mar 2010 | DE |
1365040 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2423350 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2839052 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2852469 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2000-048954 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-173769 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-49422 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-110567 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-203079 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-247961 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-273979 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-008859 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-009098 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2004214185 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2015-520799 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2015-521373 | Jul 2015 | JP |
10-2015-0051935 | May 2015 | KR |
10-2015-0053733 | May 2015 | KR |
569284 | Jan 2004 | TW |
1229916 | Mar 2005 | TW |
1343087 | Jun 2011 | TW |
201130929 | Sep 2011 | TW |
1356467 | Jan 2012 | TW |
201349384 | Dec 2013 | TW |
201401412 | Jan 2014 | TW |
201541546 | Nov 2015 | TW |
I518832 | Jan 2016 | TW |
I518839 | Jan 2016 | TW |
9961678 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2011024853 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2013159050 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013163622 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2015127191 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2016022728 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
J.W. Fiepke, “Permanent Magnet Materials,” ASM Handbook vol. 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, (1990) ASM International. pp. 782-803. |
Carpenter Technology Corporation, KOVAR® Alloy Technical Data Sheet, 1990. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/037464, mailed Sep. 6, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/037464, mailed Sep. 11, 2014. |
Examination Report in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102113908 dated Apr. 30, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,871 dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,871 dated Aug. 28, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038530, mailed Aug. 16, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038530, mailed Nov. 6, 2014. |
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 13780965.3 dated Aug. 3, 2015. |
Search and Examination Report for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201406893X dated Aug. 18, 2015. |
Examination Report in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102114999 dated Jul. 29, 2015. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US2015/016799 dated Apr. 22, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/016799 dated Jun. 26, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102113908 dated Sep. 30, 2015. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380033430.7 dated Oct. 23, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102114999 dated Oct. 16, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/043884 dated Oct. 23, 2015. |
Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380026127.4 dated Mar. 3, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,871 dated Jan. 21, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,402 dated Feb. 5, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,871 dated Jun. 17, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,402 dated Jun. 14, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130276978 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61635804 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61639052 | Apr 2012 | US |