Fields for multi-reflecting TOF MS

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11049712
  • Patent Number
    11,049,712
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 26, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 29, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometer MR TOF with an orthogonal accelerator (40) is improved with at least one deflector (30) and/or (30R) in combination with at least one wedge field (46) for denser folding of ion rays (73). Systematic mechanical misalignments (72) of ion mirrors (71) may be compensated by electrical tuning of the instrument, as shown by resolution improvements between simulated peaks for non compensated case (74) and compensated one (75), and/or by an electronically controlled global electrostatic wedge/arc field within ion mirror (71).
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national phase filing claiming the benefit of and priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052101, filed on Jul. 26, 2018, which claims priority from and the benefit of United Kingdom patent application No. 1712612.9, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712613.7, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712614.5, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712616.0, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712617.8, United Kingdom patent application No. 1712618.6 and United Kingdom patent application No. 1712619.4, each of which was filed on Aug. 6, 2017. The entire content of these applications is incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF INVENTION

The invention relates to the area of time of flight and multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometers (MRTOF) with pulsed sources orthogonal pulsed converters, and is particularly concerned with improved control over drift motion in OA-MRTOF.


BACKGROUND

Time-of-flight mass spectrometers (TOF MS) are widely used for their combination of sensitivity and speed, and lately with the introduction of multiple ion mirrors and multi-reflecting schemes, for their high resolution and mass accuracy.


Pulsed ion sources are used in TOF MS for intrinsically pulsed ionization methods, such as Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption and Ionization (MALDI), Secondary Ionization (SIMS), and pulsed EI. The first two ion sources have become more and more popular for mass spectral surface imaging, where a relatively large surface area is analyzed simultaneously while using mapping properties of TOF MS. Pulsed converters are used to form pulsed ion packets out of ion beams produced by intrinsically continuous ion sources, like Electron Impact (EI), Electrospray (ESI), Atmospheric pressure ionization (APPI), atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI), and Inductively coupled Plasma (ICP).


Most common pulsed converters are orthogonal accelerators (WO9103071) and radiofrequency ion traps with pulsed radial ejection, lately used for ion injection into Orbitraps. Two aspects of prior art ion sources and converters for TOFMS are relevant: (a) they employ pulsed accelerating fields; (b) they are spatially wide which complicates their bypassing.


Resolution of TOF MS instruments has been substantially improved in multi-reflecting TOFMS (MRTOF) instruments. MRTOF instruments have parallel gridless ion mirrors, separated by a drift space, e.g. as described in SU1725289, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,107,625, 6,570,152, GB2403063, U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132, incorporated herein by reference. Most of MRTOF employ two dimensional (2D) electrostatic fields in the XY-plane between mirror electrodes, substantially elongated in the drift Z-direction. The 2D-fields of ion mirrors are carefully engineered to provide for isochronous ion motion and for spatial ion packet confinement in the transverse XY-plane. Ion packets are injected at a small inclination angle to the X-axis to produce multiple reflections in the X-direction combined with slow ion drift in the drift Z-direction, thus producing zigzag ion path. The resolving power (also referred as resolution) of MR-TOF grows at larger number of reflections N by reducing effect of the initial time spread and of the detector time spread.


By nature, the electrostatic 2D-fields have zero component EZ=0 in the orthogonal drift Z-direction, i.e. have no effect on the ion packets free propagation and its expansion in the drift Z-direction. In OA-MRTOF, the inclination angle α of zigzag ion trajectory is controlled by ion beam energy UZ and by MRTOF acceleration voltage UX, and the angular divergence Δα by the beam energy spread ΔUZ:

α=(UZ/UX)0.5; Δα=α*ΔUZ/2UZ=ΔUZ/2(UZUX)0.5  (eq. 1)


In attempts to increase MRTOF resolution by denser folding of the ion trajectory, the injection angle α (to axis X) of ion packets shall be reduced, thus, requiring much lower UZ of the injected continuous ion beam, in turn, increasing the spread of injection angles Δα. Ion packets start hitting rims of the orthogonal accelerator (OA) and detector, and may produce trajectories that overlap, thus confusing spectra. For trap converters, similar problems occur at bypassing of the trap and of the detector rims. Most importantly, the scheme appears highly sensitive to unintentional misalignments of MRTOF components, either ruining MRTOF isochronicity or requiring extremely tight precision requirements.


To address those problems, multiple complex solutions have been proposed to define the ion drift advance per reflection, to prevent or compensate the angular divergence of ion packets, and to withstand various distortions, such as stray fields and mechanical distortions of analyzer electrodes: U.S. Pat. No. 7,385,187 proposed periodic lens and edge deflectors for MRTOF; U.S. Pat. No. 7,504,620 proposed laminated sectors for MTTOF; WO2010008386 and then US2011168880 proposed quasi-planar ion mirrors having weak (but sufficient) spatial modulation of mirror fields; U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,184 proposed splitting mirror electrodes into multiple segments for arranging EZ field; U.S. Pat. No. 8,237,111 and GB2485825 proposed electrostatic traps with three-dimensional fields, though without sufficient isochronicity in all three dimensions and without non-distorted regions for ion injection; WO2011086430 proposed first order isochronous Z-edge reflections by tilting ion mirror edge combined with reflector fields; U.S. Pat. No. 9,136,101 proposed bent ion MRTOF ion mirrors with isochronicity recovered by trans-axial lens. Though prior art solutions do solve the problem of controlling Z-motion, however, they have several drawbacks, comprising: (i) technical complexity; (ii) additional time aberrations, affecting resolution; (iii) limited length of ion packets and limited duty cycle and charge capacity of pulsed converters; and most importantly, (iv) fixed arrangement with low tolerance to manufacturing faults. Those drawbacks become devastating when trying to construct a compact and low cost MRTOF instruments for higher resolutions.


Making larger analyzers raises the manufacturing cost close to the cubic power of the instrument size. It is desirable to keep instrument size at about 0.5 m, which becomes a limiting factor on the flight time TOF and mass resolution R TOF/2DET, where the practical limit for DET=1.5-2 ns if using non-stressed data systems. On the other hand, to resolve isobaric interferences, R=80-100,000 are desired, thus triggering the search for MRTOF schemes with yet denser trajectory folding, longer flight times TOF and longer flight paths L.


SUMMARY

From a first aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometer comprising:


(a) a pulsed ion emitter having a pulsed acceleration region and a static acceleration region to accelerate ions substantially along an X-direction; said pulsed ion emitter configured to emit ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;


(b) a pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by a drift space; wherein electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in a Z-direction that is orthogonal to said X-direction so as to form a substantially two-dimensional electrostatic field in the XY-plane orthogonal to said Z-direction;


(c) a time-of-flight detector;


(d) at least one electrostatic ion deflector arranged for deflecting ion trajectories by angle ψ in the XZ plane; and


(e) at least one electrode structure configured to form a local wedge electrostatic field having equipotential field lines that are tilted with respect to the Z-direction, arranged either in said pulsed accelerating region and/or in an ion retarding region of one or both of said ion mirrors, followed by an electrostatic acceleration field having equipotential field lines that are parallel to the Z-direction; said at least one electrode structure being arranged to adjust the time front tilt angle γ of said ion packets in the XZ plane, and to steer the ion trajectories by inclination angle ϕ in the XZ plane;


(f) wherein said angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for: (i) denser folding of the ion trajectories at inclination angle α to the X-direction that is smaller than said angle α0, (ii) and/or for causing ions to bypass rims of said pulsed ion emitter or ion deflector, (iii) and/or for reversing ion drift motion in said Z-direction;


(g) wherein said time front tilt angle γ and said ion deflecting angle ψ are set for compensation of the ion packets time front tilt angle induced by the ion deflector


In step (g), the time front tilt angle γ and ion steering angles ψ may be electrically adjusted or selected for local mutual compensation of the ion packets time front tilt angle induced by the ion deflector. The local compensation may be performed within at most a pair of ion mirror reflections.


Electrodes of the electrode structure may be connected to an adjustable voltage supply for adjusting the voltages applied to these electrodes so as alter said wedge electrostatic field and hence the angle of the time front tilt caused by said electrode structure.


One or more electrodes of the ion deflector may be connected to an adjustable voltage supply for adjusting the voltage(s) applied to these electrodes so as alter the ion deflecting angles ψ. The ion deflector introduces a time front tilt angle to the ion packets. The adjustable voltages may be adjusted to alter the time front tilt caused by the electrode structure and the deflecting angle of the ion deflector so that the time front tilt caused by the ion deflector is at least partially compensated for.


The time front tilt angle and ion steering angle ψ may be electrically adjusted or set for the global mutual compensation at the detector face of the ion packets time front tilt angle induced by misalignments of an ion source, and/or of said ion mirrors and/or of said detector.


The ion emitter may comprise a continuous ion source, generating an ion beam at mean specific energy UZ in the Z-direction and an orthogonal accelerator in the form of said pulsed ion emitter for pulsed ion acceleration substantially along the X-direction to specific energy UX, thus forming ion packets emitted at said inclination angle α0=(UZ/UX)0.5 to said X-direction.


The ion emitter may comprise a transverse ion confinement device selected from the group of: (i) a radiofrequency rectilinear multipolar ion guide; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar ion guide with ion beam compression and/or confinement in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic lens; and (iv) an electrostatic ion guide having a quadrupolar field that is spatially alternated along the Z-direction.


A quadrupolar field may be formed within said at least one ion deflector along the Z-direction, optionally by at least one electrode structure of the group of: (i) Matsuda plates; (ii) a gate shaped deflecting electrode; (iii) side shields of the deflector with an aspect ratio under 2; (iv) toroidal sector deflection electrodes; and (v) an electrode curvature within a trans-axial wedge deflector.


Said quadrupolar field may be adjustable for at least one purpose selected from the group of: (i) controlling the spatial focusing or defocusing of ion packets; (ii) arranging telescopic compression of the ion packets; (ii) compensating the second order time aberrations per Z-width in ion packets T|ZZ=0, either locally and/or globally.


The wedge field may be located within said pulsed accelerating region and may be arranged by an electrode structure selected from the group of: (i) a tilted pull, ground or push plate electrode; (ii) a tilted ion guide for spatial confinement of the ion beam within an ion storage region of the pulsed ion emitter; (iii) an auxiliary electrode around electrodes forming an ion storage region of the pulsed ion emitter for forming a non-equally penetrating fringing field through a window, or a mesh, or a gap into the ion storage region.


Said wedge field may be located within said ion retarding region of at least one of the ion mirrors and may be arranged by an electrode structure selected from the group comprising: (i) a wedge-shaped slit oriented in the ZY-plane and located between mirror electrodes; (ii) at least one printed circuit board with discrete electrodes aligned in the Z-direction, connected via a resistive divider and located between mirror electrodes; (iii) a locally tilted portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror; and (iv) at least one split portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror, connected to a separate potential.


At least one of the following may be provided: (i) said at least one deflector may be located to receive ions after a first ion mirror reflection and optionally before a second ion mirror reflection; (ii) a lens or a trans-axial lens may be provided at the exit of said pulsed ion emitter and at least one ion deflector may be provided that is configured for ion packet defocusing, so as to provide telescopic compression of said ion packets; (iii) a lens may be located proximate one of said ion mirrors and arranged to receive ions reflected by that ion mirror in one mirror reflection and also after a second subsequent reflection from that ion mirror; (iv) a dual ion deflector may be arranged proximate said detector for causing the ions to bypass the detector's rim; and (v) a dual ion deflector with a spatially focusing quadrupolar field may be provided for reversing the ion drift motion in the Z-direction and compensating a tilt of the ion packet time front.


The spectrometer may further comprise at least one printed circuit board, located between electrodes of at least one of said mirrors; said board having discrete electrodes, connected to each other via a resistive chain and to a voltage supply for forming a wedge or arc shaped electrostatic field within the ion retarding region of the ion mirror for altering the ion packet time-front tilt.


Electrodes of at least one of said ion mirror may be made of one or more printed circuit boards having conductive pads; optionally having a rib mounted thereto for maintaining the flatness thereof.


The present invention also provides a method of multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometry comprising:


providing a spectrometer as described hereinabove;


pulsing ions along the X-direction with the pulsed ion emitter so as to emit ion packets at said inclination angle α0;


oscillating ions in the X-direction between the mirrors as the ions drift in the Z-direction; and


deflecting the ion trajectories by angle ψ in the XZ plane using the ion deflector;


wherein the time front tilt angle γ of the ion packets is adjusted, and the steering angle of the ion trajectories is adjusted by inclination angle ϕ, in the XZ plane, using said wedge electrostatic field and electrostatic acceleration field so as to (i) more densely fold the ion trajectories at inclination angle α to the X-direction that is smaller than said angle α0, (ii) and/or to cause ions to bypass a rim of said pulsed ion emitter or ion deflector, (iii) and/or to reverse ion drift motion in said Z-direction.


The method may comprise adjusting one or more voltages applied to the ion deflector and/or pulsed ion emitter so as to adjust the ion deflecting angle ψ and/or time front tilt angle γ so as to at least partially compensate for a time front tilt angle induced by the ion deflector.


The wedge field may be arranged in at least one of said ion mirrors and so as to extend in the Z-direction by a distance such that ions reflected by that mirror between 2 and 4 times pass through the wedge field.


The method may comprise forming a wedge-shaped or curved electric field within the reflecting region of at least one ion mirror and along substantially the entire ion path in the Z-direction, optionally for compensating the isochronicity of ion motion related to the ion packet Z-width.


The method may comprise adjusting voltages applied to the spectrometer so as to spatially vary the wedge-shaped or curved electric field.


Said compensating of the tilt angle of the ion packets time front may comprise monitoring the resolution of the spectrometer whilst adjusting said deflecting angle and/or steering angle and/or ion beam energy at the entrance of said pulsed ion emitter.


The deflecting angle and/or steering angle and/or ion beam energy may be varied until the resolution is optimised, and then these parameters may then be fixed.


This technique may account for mechanical inaccuracies or misalignments of said ion emitter, of said ion mirrors, of said wedge field structures, or of said ion detector.


The method may comprise at least one step of the following group: (i) providing said at least one ion deflector downstream of the first ion mirror reflection; (ii) telescopically compressing said ion packets using a lens or a trans-axial lens at the exit of said pulsed ion emitter and setting said at least one deflector to an ion defocusing state; (iii) focusing ion packets using a lens located in proximate one of said ion mirrors and arranged to receive ions reflected by that ion mirror in one mirror reflection and also after a second subsequent reflection from that ion mirror; (iv) displacing the ion trajectory using a dual ion deflector arranged in proximate said detector so that ions bypass the detector's rim; and (v) reversing of the ion drift motion in the Z-direction at compensated tilt of the ion packet time front with a dual deflector having a spatially focusing quadrupolar field.


There are proposed herein several ion optical elements and solutions which are novel at least for MRTOF field:


I. A combination of wedge reflecting fields or wedge accelerating fields with “flat” post-acceleration. Such optical element, further referred as “amplifying wedge field” appears a powerful, flexible and electrically adjustable tool for tilting time fronts of ion packets while introducing very minor ion ray steering;


II. An electrically controlled wedge field near retarding equipotential of ion mirrors for compensation of time-front parasitic tilts introduced by mechanical unintentional misalignments of accelerators, ion mirror electrodes and detector;


III. A compensated deflector, incorporating quadrupolar field, in most simple example produced by Matsuda plates. The compensated deflector overcomes the over-focusing of conventional deflectors in MRTOF, so as provides an opportunity for controlled ion packet focusing and defocusing;


IV. A set of compensated deflectors for flexible controlling of both time-front tilt angle and ion ray steering angle.


Further, it has been realized that applying a combination of compensated deflectors with amplifying wedge fields to MRTOF allows reaching the desired combination of: (a) elevated energies of ion beams at the entrance of orthogonal accelerators for improved sensitivity and for reduced angular divergence Δα of ion packets; (b) dense folding of ion rays at small inclination angles for higher resolution of MPTOF; (c) spatial ion packet focusing Z|Z=0 onto detector; and (d) mutual compensation of multiple aberrations, including (i) first order time-front tilt T|Z, (ii) chromatic angular spread α|β and, accounting analyzer properties, most of Y-related time-of-flight aberrations.


Most of the proposed schemes and embodiments were tested and are presented herein in ion optical simulations, which have verified the stated ion optical properties, including flexible tuning and compensation of misalignments; so as confirmed an ability of reaching substantially improved combination of resolution and sensitivity within compact MPTOF systems. As an example, FIG. 11 illustrates a compact 250×450 mm MRTOF system reaching resolution over 80,000.


Embodiments of the present invention provide a multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometer comprising:

  • (a) A pulsed ion emitter having pulsed acceleration region and static acceleration region with field strengths directed substantially along the X-direction; said pulsed source periodically emits ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;
  • (b) A pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by drift space; electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in the Z-direction to form a substantially two-dimensional electrostatic field in the orthogonal XY-plane; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane;
  • (c) A time-of-flight detector;
  • (d) At least one electrically adjustable electrostatic deflector, numbered as n along the ion path and arranged for steering of ion trajectories for angles ψn, associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front;
  • (e) At least one, numbered as m along the ion flight path, electrode structure to form an adjustable local wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines tilted with respect to the Z-direction either in said pulsed accelerating region and/or in the retarding region of said ion mirror, followed by electrostatic acceleration in Z-independent (flat) field; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time front tilt angle γm of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at much smaller (relative to said angle γm) inclination angle ϕm;
  • (f) Wherein said steering angles ψ1 and ϕ1 are arranged for either denser folding of major portion of ion trajectories at inclination angles α being smaller than said angle α0, and/or for bypassing rims of said accelerator or deflector, and/or for reverting ion drift motion within said analyzer this way extending ion flight paths and resolutions;
  • (g) Wherein said time front tilt angles γm and said ion steering angles ψn are electrically adjusted for local mutual compensations of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by individual n-th deflector, said local compensation occurring within at most pair of ion mirror reflections; and
  • (h) Wherein said time front tilt angles γm and said ion steering angles ψn are electrically adjusted for the global mutual compensation at the detector face of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by misalignments of said ion source, of said ion mirrors and of said detector.


Preferably, said ion emitter may comprise a continuous ion source, generating an ion beam at mean specific energy UZ in the Z-direction and an orthogonal accelerator for pulsed ion acceleration substantially along a second orthogonal X-direction to specific energy UX, thus forming ion packets emitted at an inclination angle α0=(UZ/UX)0.5 to said X-axis;


Preferably, said ion emitter may comprise one mean of transverse ion confinement of the group: (i) a radiofrequency rectilinear multipolar ion guide; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar ion guide with ion beam compression in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic lens; and (iv) an electrostatic ion guide with quadrupolar field being spatially alternated along the Z-axis.


Preferably, an additional quadrupolar field may be formed within said at least one deflector by at least one electrode structure of the group: (i) Matsuda plates; (ii) gate shaped deflecting electrode; (iii) side shields of the deflector with the aspect ratio under 2; (iv) toroidal sector deflection electrodes; and (v) additional electrode curvature within a trans-axial wedge deflector.


Preferably, said additional quadrupolar field may be adjusted for the at least one purpose of the group: (i) controlling spatial focusing or defocusing of ion packets; (ii) arranging telescopic compression of ion packets; (ii) compensating second order time aberrations per Z-width in ion packets T|ZZ=0, either locally and/or globally.


Preferably, said accelerating wedge field within said emitter may be arranged with one electrode structure of the group: (i) a tilted pull, ground or push plate; (ii) a tilted ion guide for spatial confinement of said ion beam within said ion storage region; (iii) an auxiliary electrode around electrodes of said accelerator forming a non equally penetrating fringing field through a window, or a mesh, or a gap.


Preferably, said reflecting wedge field within ion retarding region of at least one ion mirror may be arranged with one electrode structure of the group: (i) a wedge slit oriented in the ZY-plane and located between mirror electrodes; (ii) at least one printed circuit board with discrete electrodes aligned in the Z-direction, connected via resistive divider and located between mirror electrodes; (iii) a locally tilted portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror; and (iv) at least one split portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror, connected to a separate potential.


Preferably, said spectrometer may further comprise at least one means of the group: (i) said at least one deflector is located after first ion mirror reflection or first ion turn; (ii) a lens or a trans-axial lens at the exit of said emitter in combination with setting of at least one deflector for ion packet defocusing, this way providing for telescopic compression of said ion packets; (iii) a lens located in close vicinity of said ion mirror and arranged to surround two adjacent ion trajectories; (iv) a dual deflector arranged in close vicinity of said detector for improved bypassing of the detector's rim; and (v) a dual deflector with spatially focusing quadrupolar field for reversing of the ion drift motion at compensated tilt of the ion packet time front.


Preferably, for the purpose of electrically compensating the ion packet time front tilting by unintentional minor inaccuracy of misalignments of said ion mirrors, said spectrometer may further comprise at least one printed circuit board, located between said mirror electrodes; said board forms discrete electrodes, connected via resistive chain to form a wedge or an arc shaped electrostatic wedge field within the ion retarding region of at least one ion mirror; said compensation is arranged both locally (within one or two adjacent ion mirror reflections) and/or globally for the entire ion path.


Preferably, said ion mirror electrodes may be made of printed circuit boards with conductive pads; wherein the flatness of said electrodes is improved by at least one attached orthogonal rib; and wherein the straightness and flatness of the electrode assembly is improved by milling slots in said electrodes for compensating the uneven thickness of the boards.


Embodiments of the present invention provide a method of multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometry comprising the following steps:

  • (a) Arranging pulsed acceleration region and static acceleration region with field strengths directed substantially along the X-direction within a pulsed ion emitter for periodically emitting ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;
  • (b) Forming a two dimensional electrostatic field in an XY-plane, substantially elongated in first Z-direction within parallel ion mirrors electrodes separated by a drift space; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane, but without affecting ion drift motion in the Z-direction;
  • (c) Detecting ions on a time-of-flight detector;
  • (d) Steering of ion trajectories for electrically adjustable angles ψn, associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front within at least one electrostatic deflector, numbered as n along the ion path;
  • (e) Forming at least one electrically adjustable local wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines tilted with respect to the Z-direction, numbered as m along the ion flight path, either in said ion pulsed accelerating region of said orthogonal accelerator and/or in the ion retarding region of said ion mirror, followed by electrostatic acceleration in a Z-independent (flat) field; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time front tilt angle γm of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at much smaller (Vs said angle γm) inclination angle ϕm;
  • (f) Wherein said steering angles ψ1 and ϕ1 are arranged for either denser folding of major portion of ion trajectories at inclination angles α being smaller than said angle α0, and/or for bypassing rims of said accelerator or deflector, and/or for reverting ion drift motion within said analyzer this way extending ion flight paths and resolutions;
  • (g) Wherein said time front tilt angles γn and said ion steering angles ψn are electrically adjusted for local mutual compensations of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by individual n-th deflector, said local compensation occurring within at most pair of ion mirror reflections; and
  • (h) Wherein said time front tilt angles γ, and said ion steering angles W are electrically adjusted for the global mutual compensation at the detector face of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by misalignments of said ion source, of said ion mirrors and of said detector.


Preferably, said step of emitting ion packets may comprise a step of generating a continuous ion beam at mean specific energy UZ in the Z-direction and a step of pulsed ion acceleration substantially along a second orthogonal X-direction to specific energy UX, thus forming ion packets emitted at an inclination angle α0=(UZ/UX)0.5 to said X-axis; Preferably, said step of ion emitting may further comprise a step of transverse ion confinement by one field of the group: (i) a quadrupolar radiofrequency field; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar field with ion beam compression in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic focusing field of periodic lens; and (iv) an electrostatic quadrupolar field, spatially alternated along the Z-axis.


Preferably, at the step of ion packet steering may further comprise a step of forming an additional quadrupolar field for the at least one purpose of the group: (i) controlling spatial focusing or defocusing of ion packets; (ii) arranging telescopic compression of ion packets; (ii) compensating second order time aberrations per Z-width in ion packets T|ZZ=0, either locally and/or globally.


Preferably, said step of forming an electrically adjustable reflecting wedge field in at least one ion mirror field may comprise a step of spreading said wedge field within a region extended in the Z-direction for several but few (between 2 and 4) ion reflections; said region being located either in the region of ion injection past said orthogonal accelerator, or in the region of ion reverting their drift motion.


Preferably, for the purpose of globally compensating isochronicity of ion motion related to the ion packet Z-width, affected by unintentional minor inaccuracy of misalignments of said ion mirror fields, said accelerator field, or with non parallel installation of said detector, the method may further comprise a step of forming electrically adjustable global (on the entire Z-width of ion path) wedge and/or arc field within reflecting region of at least one ion mirror.


Preferably, said step of global compensating of the tilt angle γ of ion packets time-front on the detector may further comprise a step of linked adjustments of said steering angles, and of ion beam energy at the entrance of said ion emitter while monitoring resolution of said method, this way accounting a given and occurred mechanical inaccuracy or misalignment of said ion emitter, of said ion mirrors, of said wedge field structures, or of said ion detector.


Preferably, the method may further comprise at least one step of the group: (i) improving the deflector bypassing by locating at least one deflector after first ion mirror reflection or after first ion turn; (ii) telescopically compressing said ion packets by a lens or a trans-axial lens at the exit of said orthogonal accelerator combined with setting of said at least one deflector to a defocusing state; (iii) focusing of ion packets by a lens located in close vicinity of said ion mirror and arranged to surround two adjacent ion trajectories; (iv) displacing ion trajectory with a dual deflector arranged in close vicinity of said detector for improved bypassing of the detector's rim; and (v) reversing of the ion drift motion at compensated tilt of the ion packet time front with a dual deflector with spatially focusing quadrupolar field.


Embodiments of the present invention provide a low cost means for controlling drift ion motion in planar MRTOF.


Embodiments provide a means and method for electronically adjusted compensation of unintentional misalignments of MRTOF components.


Embodiments provide a compact (say, 0.5 m) and low cost instrument with sufficiently high resolution R>80,000 for separating major isobaric interferences, yet without stressing requirements of the detection system and not affecting peak fidelity, while operating at reasonably high energy of continuous ion beams for improved ion beam admission into the orthogonal accelerator.


For the avoidance of doubt, the time front of the ions may be considered to be a leading edge/area of ions in the ion packet having the same mass to charge ratio (and which may have the mean average energy).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 shows prior art U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132 planar multi-reflecting TOF with gridless orthogonal pulsed accelerator OA,



FIG. 2 illustrates problems of dense trajectory folding and limitations set by mechanical precision of the analyzer;



FIG. 3 shows a deflector according to an embodiment of the present invention, compensated by an additional quadrupolar field for controlled spatial focusing and shows a telescopic arrangement with a pair of compensated deflectors;



FIG. 4 shows an amplifying accelerating wedge field and wedge accelerator according to an embodiment of the present invention, designed for flexible control over the tilt angle of ion packets' time front;



FIG. 5 shows a balanced ion injection mechanism according to an embodiment of the present invention employing the balanced deflector of FIG. 3 and wedge accelerator of FIG. 4 for controlling the inclination angle of ion packets while compensating the time-front tilt;



FIG. 6 shows numerical examples, illustrating ion packet spatial focusing within MRTOF with the injection mechanism of FIG. 5, and presents an ion optical component according to an embodiment of the present invention—i.e. a beam expander for bypassing detector rims, and demonstrates improved parameters of the exemplary compact MRTOF with a resolution R>40,000;



FIG. 7 shows a numerical example with unintentional ion mirror misalignment—a tilt of the ion mirror by 1 mrad, and illustrates how the novel injection mechanism of FIG. 5 helps compensate the misalignment with the electrical adjustment of the instrument tuning;



FIG. 8 shows a novel amplifying reflecting wedge field according to an embodiment of the present invention used for electrically adjustable tilting of ion packets time-front, shows one embodiment of the novel mirror wedge, achieved with a wedge slit, and presents results of ion optical simulations to illustrate the field structure and the bend of the retarding equipotential within the mirror wedge;



FIG. 9 shows another embodiment of the present invention for implementing the amplifying wedge mirror field of FIG. 8, here arranged with a printed circuit board auxiliary electrode for either electrically controlled tilt of the ion packet time front or for compensation of the unintentional misalignment of ion mirror electrodes;



FIG. 10 illustrates a novel arrangement according to an embodiment of present invention, using amplifying wedge mirror fields for either a compensated mechanism of ion injection into MRTOF analyzer or for a compensated far-end reflection of ion packets;



FIG. 11 shows numerical examples, illustrating ion packet spatial focusing at far-end reflection with the amplifying mirror wedge and deflector of FIG. 10 and demonstrates improved parameters with resolution R>80,000 within the exemplary compact MRTOF; and



FIG. 12 illustrates a novel method of the far-end ion packet steering in MRTOF with deflectors having quadrupolar focusing and defocusing fields of Matsuda plates.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a prior art multi-reflecting TOF instrument 10 according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,132 is shown having an orthogonal accelerator (i.e. an OA-MRTOF instrument). The MRTOF 10 comprises: an ion source 11 with a lens system 12 to form a substantially parallel ion beam 13; an orthogonal accelerator (OA) 14 with a storage gap to admit the beam 13; a pair of gridless ion mirrors 16, separated by a field-free drift region, and a detector 17. Both the OA 14 and mirrors 16 are formed with plate electrodes having slit openings, oriented in the Z-direction, thus forming a two dimensional electrostatic field, symmetric about the s-XZ symmetry plane. Accelerator 14, ion mirrors 16 and detector 17 are parallel to the Z-axis.


In operation, ion source 11 generates a continuous ion beam. Commonly, ion sources 11 comprise gas-filled radio-frequency (RF) ion guides (not shown) for gaseous dampening of ion beams. Lens 12 forms a substantially parallel continuous ion beam 13, entering OA 14 along the Z-direction. An electrical pulse in OA 14 ejects ion packets 15. Packets 15 travel in MRTOF at a small inclination angle α to the X-axis, controlled by the ion source bias UZ.


Referring to FIG. 2, simulation examples 20 and 21 illustrate multiple problems of the prior art MRTOF 10, if pushing for higher resolutions and denser ion trajectory folding. Exemplary MRTOF parameters are: DX=500 mm mirror cap-cap distance; DZ=250 mm wide portion of non-distorted XY-field (from the leading edge of the OA region from which ions are pulsed to the downstream edge of the detecting surface); acceleration potential is UX=8 kV, OA rim=10 mm and detector rim=5 mm.


In the example 20, to fit 14 reflections (i.e. L=7 m flight path) the source bias is set to UZ=9V. Parallel rays with initial ion packet width Z0=10 mm and no angular spread Δα=0 start hitting rims of the OA 14 and detector 17.


In example 21, the top ion mirror is tilted by λ=1 mrad, representing a realistic overall effective angle of mirror tilt, accounting for built up faults of the stack assemblies, standard accuracy of machining and moderate electrode bend due to internal stress at machining. Every “hard” ion reflection in the top ion mirror then changes the inclination angle α by 2 mrad. The inclination angle α grows from α1=27 mrad to α2=41 mrad, gradually expanding the central trajectory. To hit the detector after N=14 reflections, the source bias has to be reduced to UZ=6V. The angular divergence is amplified by the mirror tilt and increases the ion packets width to ΔZ=18 mm, inducing ion losses on the rims. Obviously, slits in the drift space may be used to avoid trajectory overlaps, however, at a cost of additional ionic losses.


In example 21, the inclination of the ion mirror introduces yet another and much more serious problem—the time-front 15 becomes tilted by angle γ=14 mrad in-front of the detector. The total ion packet spreading in the time-of-flight X-direction ΔX=ΔZ*γ=0.3 mm limits mass resolution to R<L/2ΔX=11,000 at L=7 m flight path, which is too low compared to, for example, a desired R=80,000. To avoid the limitation, the electrode precision has to be brought to a non-realistic level: λ<0.1 mrad, which translates to better than 10 um accuracy and straightness of individual electrodes.


Summarizing problems of prior art MRTOFs, attempts of increasing flight path require much lower specific energies UZ of the continuous ion beam and larger angular divergences Δα of ion packets, which induce ion losses on component rims and may produce spectral overlaps. Most important, small mechanical imperfections strongly affect MRTOF resolution and require unreasonably high precision.


With a complex electrode structure and tight requirements on the parallelism of analyzer electrodes in MPTOF, it is desirable to keep instrument size at about 0.5 m. Electrodes stability and vacuum chamber sagging under atmospheric pressure limit the analyzer width to under 300-350 mm. Making larger analyzers raises the manufacturing cost close to the cubic power of the instrument size.


The ideal MPTOF is expected to provide a significant gain in resolution, while not pushing the data system and detector time spreading (at peak base) under DET=2 ns, thus, not requiring ultra-fast detectors with strong signal ringing, or without artificially sharpening resolution by “centroid detection” algorithms, mining mass accuracy and merging mass isobars. To resolve practically important isobars at mass resolution R=TOF/2DET, the peak width shall be less than the isobaric mass difference, hence requiring longer flight time TOF and longer flight path L (calculated for 5 kV acceleration), all shown in Table 1 below.













TABLE 1





Replacing
Mass defect,
Resolution >
TOF>,
Flight Path


elements
mDa
(μ = 1000)
us
L>, m



















C for H12
94
10,600
42
1.33


O for CH4
38.4
26,000
104
3.3


ClH for C3
24
41,600
167
5.3


N for CH2
12.4
80,600
320
10









The table presents the most relevant and most frequent isobaric interferences of first isotopes. In case of LC-MS, the required resolution is over 80,000. In case of GC-MS, where most ions are under 500 amu, the required resolution is over 40K.


Embodiments of the present invention provide the instrument with sufficiently high resolution R>80,000 for separating major isobaric interferences, yet without stressing requirements of the detection system and not affecting peak fidelity.


Referring to FIG. 3, there is proposed a compensated deflector 30 to steer ion rays while overcoming the over-focusing effects of conventional deflectors by incorporating a quadrupolar field EQ=2UQz/H2 in addition to deflection field EZ=U/H. The exemplary compensated deflector 30 comprises a pair of deflection plates 32 with side plates 33 at different potential UQ, known as Matsuda plates for sectors. The additional quadrupolar field provides the first order compensation for angular dispersion of conventional deflectors. The compensated deflector 30 is capable of steering ions by the same angle ψ regardless of the Z-coordinate, tilts time front by angle γ=−ψ, is capable of compensating the over-focusing (F→∞) while avoiding bending of the time front 34 (typical for conventional deflectors), or alternatively is capable of controlling the focal distance F independently of the steering angle ψ.

rψ=D/2H*U/K; γ=−ψ=const(z)  (Eq. 3)


Alternatively, compensated deflectors may be trans-axial (TA) deflectors, formed by wedge electrodes. Embodiments of the invention propose using a first order correction, produced by an additional curvature of TA-wedge. Controlled focusing/defocusing may be also generated by combination of the TA-wedge and TA-lens, arranged separately or combined into a single TA-device. For a narrower range of deflection angles, the compensated deflector may be arranged with a single potential while selecting the size of Matsuda plates or with a segment of toroidal sector.


Compensated deflectors nicely fit MRTOF. The quadrupolar field in the Z-direction generates an opposite focusing or defocusing field in the transverse Y-direction. Below simulations prove that the focal properties of MRTOF analyzers are sufficient to compensate for the Y-focusing of deflectors 30 without any significant TOF aberrations.


Again referring to FIG. 3, an embodiment 35 is shown with a pair of compensated deflectors 36 and 37, each comprising: a single deflecting plate 32, a shield 38 at drift potential and Matsuda plate 33. Deflectors 36 and 37 are spaced by one ion reflection in an ion mirror 16. In other words, the ions may undergo only a single ion mirror reflection between passing through deflector 36 and deflector 37. Since Matsuda plates allow achieving both focusing and defocusing, a pair of deflectors 36 and 37 may be arranged for telescopic compression of ion packets 31 to 39 with the factor of compression being given by ΔZ1/ΔZ=C1, achieved at mutual compensation of the time front steering angle γ=0, equivalent to T|Z=0 if adjusting steering angles as ψ12*C1. The pair of deflectors 36 and 37 may provide for parallel-to-parallel ray transformation, which provides for mutual compensation of the time-front curvature, equivalent to T|ZZ=0. Then the compression factor of the second deflector 37 may be considered as C2=1/C1. Use of arrangement 35 is exampled by ion packet displacement in FIG. 6 and by reversing of ion drift motion in FIG. 12.


Referring to FIG. 4, a novel orthogonal accelerator (OA) 40 according to an embodiment of the present invention is proposed, incorporating a wedge accelerating field in the area of stagnated ion packets, combined with a flat accelerating fields, thus forming an “amplifying wedge field”. The amplifying wedge field allows electronically controlling the tilt angle γ of ion packets' time-front at substantially smaller steering angle θ of ion rays.


Exemplary orthogonal accelerator 40 OA comprises: a region of pulsed wedge field 45, arranged between tilted push electrode 44 and ground plate 47 aligned with the Z-axis; and a straight DC accelerating field 48 formed by electrodes parallel to the Z-axis. Field 48 may have accelerating and decelerating regions for producing low time spread and spatial ion focusing of ion packets in the XY-plane, however, all equipotential lines of field 48 stay parallel to the Z-axis.


In operation, continuous ion beam 41 enters OA along the Z-axis at specific ion energy UZ, e.g. defined by voltage bias of an upstream RF ion guide. Preferably ion beam angular divergence, spatial expansion and beam initial position are controlled by some radial confinement means, e.g. of the group: (i) a radiofrequency rectilinear multipolar ion guide; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar ion guide with ion beam compression in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic lens; and (iv) proposed in a co-pending application, an electrostatic ion guide with quadrupolar field being spatially alternated along the Z-axis. An electrical pulse is applied periodically to push plate 44, ejecting a portion of the beam 41 through an aperture in electrode 47, thus forming an ion packet with starting time-front 42, which crosses a starting equipotential 46, tilted at the angle λ0. Ions start with zero mean energy in the X-direction K=0. At the exit of wedge field 45 ions gain specific energy K1 and at the exit of the DC field 48 the ions have energy K0. Assuming a small angle λ0 of equipotential 46 (in further examples 0.5 deg), a beam thickness of at least ΔX>1 mm and a moderate ion packet length (examples use Z0=10 mm), the λo tilt of starting equipotential 46 produces negligible corrections on energy spread ΔK of ion packet 49.


While applying trivial mathematics a non-expected and previously unknown result was arrived at: in accelerator 40 with amplifying wedge accelerating field, the time-front tilt angle relative to the z-axis (γ) and the ion steering angle θ introduced by the wedge field are controlled by the energy factor K0/K1 as:

γ=2λ*(K0/K1)0.5=2λ*u0/u1
ϕ=2λ/3*(K1/K0)0.5=2λ/3*u1/u0
i.e. γ/ϕ=3K0/K1>>1


where K1 and K0 are mean ion kinetic energies at the exit of the wedge field 45 (index 1) and at the exit of flat field 48 (index 0) respectively, and u1 and u0 are the corresponding mean ion velocities.


Thus, novel accelerators with amplifying wedge field allow (i) operating with continuous ion beams introduced along the Z-axis, which allows convenient instrumental arrangements; (ii) tilting ion packets time-front by substantial angles γ, which may then be used for compensation of the time-front tilt in ion deflectors; (iii) controlling the tilt angle electronically, either by adjusting the pulse potential or by minor steering of continuous ion beam between various starting equipotential lines.


Again referring to FIG. 4, similar embodiment 40TR is proposed for an ion trap converter, having the same (as 40 OA) reference numbers for accelerator components. The trap may be arranged for ion through passage or for ion trapping in the Z-direction, where 41 is either an ion beam or an ion cloud correspondingly. In both cases it is anticipated using one of the same (as in 40 OA) means for radial ion confinement, for example: (i) a radiofrequency rectilinear multipolar ion guide; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar ion guide with ion beam compression in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic lens; and (iv) proposed in a co-pending application, an electrostatic ion guide with quadrupolar field being spatially alternated along the Z-axis.


Ion injection into MRTOF may be improved by using higher energy continuous ion beams for improving the ion beam admission into an orthogonal accelerator (OA) and for reducing angular divergence of ion packets in the MRTOF. For higher MRTOF resolution, ion trajectories may be compact folded by using back steering of ion packets, achieved with an ion deflector. To compensate for the time-front tilt produced by the deflector, it is proposed to use an amplifying wedge accelerating field in the OA.


Referring to FIG. 5, there is shown an ion injection mechanism for an MRTOF according to an embodiment 50 of the present invention comprising: a planar ion mirror 53 with a 2D XY-field, extended in the Z-direction; an orthogonal accelerator 40 with a “flat” DC acceleration field 48 aligned with the Z-axis and a wedge accelerating field 45 produced by tilted push plate 44; and a compensated deflector 30, located along the ion path and after the first ion mirror reflection. Deflector 30 is similar to that in FIG. 3 and accelerator 40 to that in FIG. 4.


The operation of embodiment 50 is illustrated by simulation example 51, showing time fronts 54 and 55 crossing ion rays. Continuous ion beam 41 at specific energy UZ=57V propagates along the Z-axis to cross starting (K=0) equipotential 46, which is tilted at the angle λ0=0.5 deg by push plate 44 being tilted by 1 deg to the Z-axis. Pulsed wedge field 45 accelerates ions to mean energy K1=800V, and flat field 48 to K0==8 kV, thus producing an amplifying factor K0/K1≅10. The amplifying wedge tilts the ion packets time front 54 at a large angle γ=2λ0*(K0/K)0.5≈6λ0, while having a small effect on the rays angle α1=α0−ϕ=4.7 deg at ϕ≅0.2 deg, i.e. ion rays are inclined almost at the natural inclination angle α0=(UZ/UX)0.5=4.9 deg. After the first ion mirror reflection, deflector 30 steers ion rays by ψ=−γ=−3.2 deg, thus reducing the inclination angle to α21−ψ1.5 deg, while aligning the ion packets time front 55 with the Z-axis, i.e. γ=0. Much higher specific energies of the ion beam (UZ=57V Vs 9V in to prior art 20) improve the ion admission into the OA and reduce the angular divergence Δα of ion packets for denser folding of ion trajectories at smaller inclination angles, here at α2=α1−ψ=1.5 deg Vs natural inclination angle α0=4.9 deg.


Table 2 below summarizes equations for angles within individual deflector 30 and wedge accelerator 40. Table 3 below presents conditions for compensation of the first order time front tilt and of the chromatic spread of Z-velocity. It is of significant importance that both compensations are achieved simultaneously. This is new finding in the field. The pair of wedge accelerator 40 and deflector 30 work nicely for MRTOF 50—it compensates multiple aberrations, including the first order time front tilt, the chromatic angular spread and, accounting focusing properties of gridless ion mirrors in example 51, the angular and spatial spreads of ion packets in the Y-direction.












TABLE 2








Chromatic





dependence of



Time front
Rays Steering
Z-velocity



Tilt Angle
Angle
d(Δw)/dδ







Wedge Accelerator





γ
0

(
OA
)


=

2


λ
0





K
0


K
1













φ

(
OA
)





+


2


λ
0


3






K
1


K
0













λ
0



u
0





K
0


K
1












Deflector
−ψ0
ψ0





-

1
2




u
0



ψ
0























TABLE 3






Condition for the 1st
Condition for



order Time-front
Compensating Chromatic



Tilt Compensation
Spread of Z-velocity







Wedge Accelerator + Deflector





2

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0










2

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0














Referring back to FIG. 5, an alternative embodiment 52 differs from 50 by tilting DC acceleration field by angle λ0 to the Z-axis for aligning ion beam 41 with starting equipotential line 46 parallel to the Z-axis. The angles are shifted, however, the above described compensations still survive.


Referring to FIG. 6, the compensated mechanism 50 of ion injection into MRTOF has been verified in ion optical simulations 60, 62, 64 and 66. An exemplary MRTOF comprises an ion mirrors 53 with mirror cap-cap distance DX=450 mm and useful width DZ=250 mm, operating at acceleration potential UX=8 kV. The examples of FIG. 6 employ the compensated deflector 30 with Matsuda plates of FIG. 3, amplifying wedge accelerator 40 of FIG. 4, a dual deflector 30D with Matsuda plates, and TOF detector 17, assumed having DET=1.5 ns Gaussian signal spread. Similar to example 51, a continuous ion beam of μ=1000 amu with ΔX=1 mm width and 2 deg full angular divergence enters wedge OA at UZ=57V specific (per charge) energy and ΔUZ=0.5V energy spread.


Example 60 illustrates spatial focusing of ion rays 61 for Z=10 mm long ion packets (the initial length of the ion packet along the Z-axis), while not accounting angular spread of ion packets (Δα=0 at ΔUZ=0) and not accounting relative energy spread of ion packets (δ=ΔK/K=0 at ΔX=0). The chosen position of deflector 30 improves the ion packets bypassing of the deflector 30. The Matsuda plate voltage of the deflector 30 is electrically adjusted for geometrical focusing of ion packets onto the detector, which allows a denser folding of ion rays in MRTOF at α2=1.5 deg.


Example 62 illustrates the angular divergence of ion rays 63 at ΔUZ=0.5V, while not accounting for the ion packets width Z0=0 and energy spread δ=0. Dual compensated deflector 30D (another novel component for MRTOF) helps spreading ion rays in front of the detector 17 for bypassing the detector rims (here 5 mm).


Example 64 illustrates the (predicted by Table 4 below) simultaneous compensation of chromatic angular spread α|δ=0 and first order time front tilt γ=0 at δ=0.05, ΔUZ=0, and Z0=0 (dark intervals show positions of ions of different energies at fixed time steps, in particular demonstrating energy focusing at the detector and after each reflection).


Example 66 illustrates the overall mass resolution RM=47,000 achieved in a compact 450×250 mm analyzer while accounting for all realistic spreads of ion beam and ion packets, so as DET=1.5 ns time spread. The embodiment satisfies the previously set goal R>40,000 for resolving major isobars presented in Table 1 for μ=m/z<500 in GC-MS instruments.


The injection mechanism 50 has a built-in and not yet fully appreciated virtue—an ability to compensate for mechanical imperfections of MRTOF by electrical tuning of the instrument, including adjustment of ion beam energies UZ, pulse voltage on push plate 44, deflector 30 steering, or steering of continuous ion beam 41 to fit different equipotential lines 46.


Referring to FIG. 7, there is presented a simulation example 70, employing the MRTOF analyzer of FIG. 6 with DX=450 mm, DZ=250 mm, and UX=8 kV. The example 70 is different from 60 by introducing Φ=1 mrad tilt of the entire top mirror 71, representing a typical non-intentional mechanical fault during manufacturing. If using the tuning settings of FIG. 6, the resolution drops to 25,000 as shown in the graph 74. The resolution may be partially recovered to R=43,000 as shown in icon 75 by increasing the source bias and specific energy of continuous ion beam from UZ=57V to UZ=77V, and by retuning deflectors 30 and 30D. Example 70 shows ion rays after the compensation when accounting for all realistic ion beam and ion packet spreads, similar to FIG. 6. Thus, the proposed injection scheme 50 into compact MRTOF still allows reaching the goal of R=40,000 for GC-MS.


Embodiments of the invention propose to arrange wedge fields in the reflection region of parallel ion mirrors for effective and electrically tuned control over the inclination angle of ion packets in the MRTOF. Referring to FIG. 8, a model gridless ion mirror 80 according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises a wedge reflecting field 85 and a flat post-accelerating field 88. An ion packet 84 (formed with any pulsed converter or ion source) is initially aligned with the Z-axis, as shown by a line for the time-front. Ion packet 84 has mean (average) ion energy K0 and energy spread ΔK (in the X-direction). Ion packet 84 enters the model wedge ion mirror at an inclination angle α (to the X-direction).


Flat field 88 has equipotential lines parallel to the Z-axis within boundaries corresponding to mean energies K0 and K1, where K0>K1. Model wedge field 85 is arranged with uniformly diverging equipotentials in the XZ-plane, where the field strength E(z) is independent of the X-coordinate, and within the ion passage Z-region the field E(z) is inversely proportional to the Z-coordinate: E(z)˜1/z. Wedge field 85 starts at an equipotential corresponding to K=K1 and continues at least to the ion turning equipotential 86 (K=0), which is tilted to the Z-axis at λ0 angle.


While applying standard mathematics a non expected and previously unknown result was arrived at: in ion mirror 80 with wedge field 85, the time-front tilt angle γ and the ion steering angle ϕ are controlled by the energy factor K0/K1 as:

γ=4λ0*(K0/K1)0.5=4λ0*u0/u1
ϕ=4λ0/3*(K1/K0)0.5=4λ0/3*u1/u0
i.e. γ/ϕ=3K0/K1>>1


where K1 and K0 are mean ion kinetic energies at the exit of the wedge field 85 (index 1) and at the exit of flat field 88 (index 0) respectively, and ui and uo are the corresponding mean ion velocities. The angle ratio γ/ϕ=3K0/K1 may in practice reach well over 10 or 30 and is controlled electronically.


At K0/K1=1 (i.e. without acceleration in the field 88), the wedge field already provides a twice larger time front tilt γ compared to fully tilted ion mirrors (γ=4λ0Vs γ=2λ0), while producing a smaller steering angle (ϕ=4/3λ0 Vs ϕ=2λ0). The angles ratio γ/ϕ further grows with the energy factor as K0/K1 because the angles are transformed with ion acceleration in the field 88: both flight time difference dT and z-velocity w are preserved with the flat field 88, where the time-front tilt dT/u grows with ion velocity u and the steering angle dw/u drops with ion velocity u. By arranging larger K0/K1 ratio, the combination of wedge field with post-acceleration becomes a convenient and powerful tool for adjustable steering of time fronts, accompanied by negligibly minor steering of ion rays.


Again referring to FIG. 8, one embodiment 81 of an ion mirror with amplifying reflecting wedge field is shown comprising a regular structure of parallel mirror electrodes, all aligned in Z-direction, where C denotes the mirror cap electrode, and E1 is the 1st mirror frame electrode (usually, there are 4 to 8 such frame electrodes). Mirror 81 further comprises a thin wedge electrode W, located between cap C and 1st frame electrode E1. Wedge electrode W has a constant thickness in the X-direction and is aligned parallel with the Z-axis, however, it has wedge window in the YZ-plane for variable attenuation of cap electrode C potential. Such a wedge window appears sufficient for minor curving of the reflecting equipotential 86 in the XZ-plane, while having minor effect on the structure and curvatures of the XY-field.


An ion optical model for the wedge electrode W of embodiment 81 is illustrated by icons 82 and 83, where Icon 82 shows the electrode structure (C, W and E1) around the ion reflection region and also shows equipotential lines in the XY-plane at one particular Z-coordinate. Icon 83 illustrates a slight bending of the retarding equipotential 86 in the XZ-middle plane, at strong disproportional compression of the picture in the Z-direction so that the slight curvature of the line 86 can be seen. Dark vertical strips in icon 83 correspond to ion trajectories, arranged at relative energy spread δ=0.05, so that angled tips illustrate the range of ion penetration into the mirror. Icon 83 shows that the wedge field 85 is spread in the Z-direction in the region for several ion reflections, which helps distributing the time-front tilting at yet smaller bend of equipotential 86.


Simulations have shown that: (i) adjustments of the amplifying factor of 4(K0/K1)0.5 allows strong tilting of the time-front at small wedge angles λ0, thus not ruining the structure of electrical fields, which are optimized for reaching overall isochronicity and spatial focusing of ion packets; (ii) the time front tilt angle can be electronically adjusted from 0 to 6 degrees if using wedge W in both opposite ion mirrors; (iii) the compensation of the time front tilting for deflectors is reached simultaneously with compensation of chromatic dependence of the Z-velocity, as illustrated in FIG. 10.


Referring to FIG. 9, yet another embodiment 90 of an ion mirror with an amplifying wedge reflecting field is shown comprising conventional ion mirror electrodes C, E1 (and optionally further frame electrodes, E2, etc) and further comprising a printed circuit board 91, placed between cap C and first frame electrode E1. Exemplary PCB 91 is either composed of two parallel PCB plates or may be one PCB with a constant (z-independent) window size.


To produce a desired curvature or bend of the ion retarding equipotential 96, the PCB 91 carries multiple electrode segments, connected via resistive chain 92, preferably surface mounted SMD resistors, energized by at least one additional power supply, or by several power supplies U1 . . . Uj 93. Preferably, absolute voltages of supplies 93 are kept at low, say under 1 kV, which is to be achieved at ion optical optimization of the mirror electrode structure. The net of resistors 92 and power supplies 93 may be used for generating electronically controlled amplifying wedge mirror fields. Exemplary retarding equipotential 96 has wedges at both the near and far Z-ends for the purpose of compensated deflection according to FIG. 10. The Z-range, the amplitude and the sign of the wedge field angle are variable electronically as indicated by dashed line 95.


Realistic instruments may have a slight mechanical inaccuracy in parallelism of the orthogonal accelerator electrodes, ion mirror electrodes and of the detector. One mechanism of compensating misalignments was presented in FIG. 7, where mirror tilt was compensated by adjusting the ion beam energy and steering angle in deflectors. Here, an alternative compensation method is presented comprising an electronically controlled ion mirror wedge.


Again referring to FIG. 9, an exemplary embodiment 94 illustrates the case of mirror cap C being unintentional tilted by angle 2c, which is expected to be a fraction of 1 mrad at a realistic accuracy of mirror manufacturing. A printed circuit board 91 may be used for recovering the straightness of the reflecting equipotential 97, primarily designed for compensation of time-front tilting by unintentional mirror faults. Similarly, a second (opposing) ion mirror may have another PCB for providing a quadratic distribution of PCB potentials for electronically controlled correction of unintentional overall bend of ion mirror electrodes. Exemplary retarding equipotentials 98 and 99 illustrate an ability of forming a compensating wedge or curvature, designed for compensating unintentional electrode misalignments.


Optionally, PCB electrodes 91 may be used at manufacturing tests only for measuring the occurred inaccuracy of ion mirrors when measuring the required PCB compensation at recovered MRTOF resolution, which in turn could be used for calibrated mechanical adjustment of individual ion mirrors. Alternatively, the number of regulating power supplies 93 may be potentially reduced and the strategy of analyzer tuning may be optimized for constant use. It is expected that a pair of auxiliary power supplies may be used for simultaneous reaching of: creating preset wedge fields at far and near Z-edges, compensating electrode faulty tilts, and compensating electrode faulty bends. Indeed, all wedge fields produce the same action—to tilt the time front of ion packets, and it is expected that a generic distribution of PCB potentials may be pre-formed for each mirror, while controlling the overall tilt and bow of wedge fields by a pair of low voltage power supplies 93.


Compared to tilted push plate 44 in FIG. 4 or wedge slit W in FIG. 8, PCB wedge mirrors 90 and 91 look more attractive for being more flexible. Adjusting potentials allows adjusting amplitude and changing the sign of the bend or tilt of the reflecting equipotential 96. Electronically controlled PCB wedge mirrors may be also used for improved injection or in other methods of compensated ion packet steering.


As described in a co-pending application, the proposed compensation mechanism of FIG. 9 may allow using lower cost technologies of ion mirror making, characterized by lower precision. The compensation shifts the precision requirements in the range of 0.1-0.3 mm. Embodiments of the invention propose making mirror electrodes from printed circuit board electrodes, so as to use the PCB for electrode mounting, e.g. by soldering. To avoid insulator charging and to avoid surface discharges at up to 5-10 kV voltages, PCB elements may have machined slots. While slots can be metal coated as vias and may be milled precisely, the biggest obstacle of applying the PCB technology to ion mirrors is related to the uneven thickness of the boards, usually specified as up to 5% of the PCB thickness and rarely controlled at PCB manufacturing. Embodiments of the invention propose an improvement of PCB electrode flatness and positioning by the following steps: using at least one attached orthogonal PCB rib with a precisely machined edge; milling slots in the PCB having electrodes for attaching those ribs with a face surface of said electrodes being pressed against a hard and flat surface.


Referring to FIG. 10, embodiments 100 of an ion injection mechanism into MRTOF are shown comprising: a “flat” orthogonal accelerator 102, having push plate 44 and “flat” acceleration field 48—both aligned with the Z-axis; an ion mirror with a “flat” field 88 at ion mirror entrance (along X) and with a reflecting wedge field 85, characterized by a tilted retarding equipotential 86 at λ0 angle to the Z-axis; and a compensated deflector 30 of FIG. 3, located along the ion path and after first ion mirror reflection.


Ion beam 41 propagates along the Z-axis at elevated (compared to FIG. 11) energies (e.g. 20-50V) and enters accelerator 102. Pulsed ejected ion packets have time-front 103 being parallel to the Z-axis while traveling at an inclination angle α1 of several degrees. After reflection with the wedge mirror field 85 and after post-acceleration in the flat field 88, the ion packets' time-front 104 becomes tilted at angle γ>>λ0. Ion rays are steered back by angle ψ=−γ with compensated deflector 30 so that the inclination angle α21−ψ is substantially reduced for denser trajectory folding in MRTOF, while orientation of the time-front 105 is recovered for γ=0.


Again referring to FIG. 10, an embodiment of back-end steering mechanism 101 in MRTOF is shown comprising a similar wedge ion mirror with “flat” entrance field 88, a wedge reflecting field 85, and with a “reflecting” or “retarding” equipotential line 86 tilted at an angle λ0. Ion packets 106 arrive to the far Z-end after multiple reflections in MRTOF, where they traveled at an inclination angle α2 and with the time front 106 being parallel to the Z-axis, i.e. γ=0. After ion reflection in mirror wedge field 85 and after post-acceleration in flat field 88, ion packets time-front 107 becomes tilted by a relatively large (say, 3 deg) angle γ=2α2. Ion rays are steered back by angle γ=−γ=2α2 by compensated deflector 30R, so that the inclination angle becomes −α2, while orientation of the time front 105 is recovered for γ=0. As a result, ion drift motion in the Z-direction is reversed without tilting of the time-front, which helps to achieve about twice denser folding of ion rays in MRTOF as shown below in FIG. 11.


Table 4 below presents formulae for time front tilt angles γ, for ray steering angles θ and for chromatic dependence d(Δw)/dδ of the Z-component of ion velocity w induced by wedge ion mirror and by deflectors.


Table 5 below shows conditions for compensating the time front tilt and the chromatic dependence of the Z-velocity in the combined system, apparently achieved simultaneously.












TABLE 4








Chromatic





dependence



Time-front
Rays Steering
of Z-velocity



Tilt Angle
Angle
d(Δw)/dδ







Wedge Mirror





γ
0

(
M
)


=

4


λ
0





K
0


K
1













φ

(
M
)





+


4


λ
0


3






K
1


K
0












2


λ
0



u
0





K
0


K
1












Deflector
−ψ0
ψ0





-

1
2




u
0



ψ
0























TABLE 5






Condition for the 1st
Condition for



order Time-front
Compensating Chromatic



Tilt Compensation
Spread of Z-velocity







Wedge Mirror + Deflector





4

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0










4

λ




K
0


K
1




=

ψ
0














Referring to FIG. 11, there are presented results of ion optical simulations of MRTOF 110 with the compensated ion reversal 101 of FIG. 10. The compact MRTOF 110 comprises: parallel ion mirrors with a mirror cap-cap distance DX=450 mm and useful length DZ=250 mm, separated by a drift space at UX=−8 kV acceleration voltage; an ion source (not shown) generating an ion beam 41 along Z-axis at UZ=57V specific energy with ΔUZ=0.5V spread; an orthogonal accelerator 40 having a tilted push electrode; a deflector 30 with compensating Matsuda plates; a reversing deflector 30R, a wedge electrode W at far Z-end; and a detector 17 at near Z-end.


Example 110 illustrates spatial focusing of ion rays 111 for Z0=10 mm long ion packets, while not accounting for angular spread of ion packets Δα=0 at ΔUZ=0 and not accounting for relative energy spread of ion packets δ=ΔK/K=0 at ΔX=0. The chosen position of deflector 30 improves the ion packets bypassing of the deflector 30 and of detector 17 rim. Matsuda plates' voltages of the deflectors 30 and 30R are electrically adjusted for moderate spatial focusing of initially parallel rays onto detector 17, while being balanced for achieving optimal focusing in other examples of FIG. 11.


Example 112 illustrates the angular divergence of ion rays 113 at ΔUZ=0.5V, while not accounting for ion packets width Z0=0 and energy spread δ=0. The Matsuda plate of the reversing deflector 30R is adjusted (being the same for all examples of FIG. 11) for spatial focusing of initially diverging rays onto detector 17.


Example 114 illustrates ion rays at all accounted spreads of ion beam. Though trajectories look like they are filling most of the drift space, apparently, simulated ion losses are within 10%.


Example 116 illustrates the overall mass resolution RM=83,000 achieved in a compact 450×250 mm analyzer while accounting for all realistic spreads of ion beam and ion packets, so as DET=1.5 ns time spread. The embodiment satisfies the previously set goal R>80,000 for resolving major isobars presented in Table 1 for μ=m/z<1000 in LC-MS instruments. N=28 reflections correspond to 14 m flight path and TOF=328 us flight time for μ=1000. Thus, the far-end compensated deflector provides almost twice denser folding of ion trajectory.


Yet higher resolutions are expected at larger size instruments, since the flight path L grows as product of instrument dimensions: L=2DX*DZ/LZ, where LZ is the ion advance per reflection. Embodiments of the invention provide methods of compensated steering, shown in FIGS. 5, 10 and 11 for keeping low LZ at dense trajectory folding, suitable for a wide range of the analyzer dimensions DX and DZ.


Referring to FIG. 12, an embodiment and simulation example of MRTOF 120 of the present invention is shown, also illustrated by zoom view 121, and comprising: ion mirrors 122, separated by a drift space and extended in the Z-direction; an orthogonal accelerator 40 (40OA) of FIG. 4, a compensated deflector 30 of FIG. 3; and a pair of compensated deflectors 124 and 125, similar to 30, however having different voltage settings of their Matsuda plates for telescopic focusing.


In operation, continuous ion beam 41 propagates along the Z-axis at elevated specific energy UZ (expected from 20 to 50V). A compensated ion injection mechanism is arranged with a wedge accelerator 40 (OA) and compensated deflector 30, similar to injection mechanism 50, described in FIG. 5. Accelerator 40 with amplifying wedge accelerating field tilts the time front 129 of ion packets to compensate for the time-front tilt of the downstream deflector 30, thus arranging dense trajectory folding at small inclination angles α2 while using relatively higher injection energies UZ. Ion packets bypass the OA 40 at larger angle α and then advance in the drift Z-direction within MRTOF along a zigzag ion trajectory at reduced inclination angle α2.


Embodiment 120 presents yet another novel ion optical solution—a compensated reversing of ion trajectories. The reversing mechanism is arranged with a pair of focusing and defocusing deflectors 124 and 125, best seen in zoom view 121, expanded in the Z-direction. Ion packets reach far Z-end of the sector analyzer at an inclination angle α2. Deflector 124 with Matsuda plates is set for increasing the inclination angle to α3 while focusing the packet Z-width within deflector 125. Deflector 125 is set to reverse ion trajectory with deflection for −2α3 angle and defocuses the packet from Z3 to Z2 by using Z-defocusing quadrupolar field of Matsuda plates in deflector 125. The focusing factor Z3/Z2 and deflection angles are arranged as 2Z33=Z23−α2) to mutually compensate for the time front tilts, as illustrated with simulated dynamics of the time front 129.


Annotations

x, y, z—Cartesian coordinates;


X, Y, Z—directions, denoted as: X for time-of-flight, Z for drift, Y for transverse;


Z0—initial width of ion packets in the drift direction;


ΔZ—full width of ion packet on the detector;


DX and DZ—used height (e.g. cap-cap) and usable width of ion mirrors


L—overall flight path


N—number of ion reflections in mirror MRTOF or ion turns in sector MTTOF


u—x-component of ion velocity;


w—z-component of ion velocity;


T—ion flight time through TOF MS from accelerator to the detector;


ΔT—time spread of ion packet at the detector;


U— potentials or specific energy per charge;


UZ and ΔUZ—specific energy of continuous ion beam and its spread;


UX—acceleration potential for ion packets in TOF direction;


K and ΔK—ion energy in ion packets and its spread;


δ=ΔK—relative energy spread of ion packets;


E—x-component of accelerating field in the OA or in ion mirror around “turning” point;


μ=m/z—ions specific mass or mass-to-charge ratio;


α—inclination angle of ion trajectory relative to X-axis;


Δα—angular divergence of ion packets;


γ—tilt angle of time front in ion packets relative to Z-axis


λ—tilt angle of “starting” equipotential to axis Z, where ions either start accelerating or are reflected within wedge fields of ion mirror


θ—tilt angle of the entire ion mirror (usually, unintentional);


φ—steering angle of ion trajectories or rays in various devices;


ψ—steering angle in deflectors


ε—spread in steering angle in conventional deflectors;


T|Z, T|ZZ, T|δ, T|δδ, etc; Indexes are defined within the text


Although the present invention has been describing with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.

Claims
  • 1. A multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometer comprising: (a) a pulsed ion emitter having a pulsed acceleration region and a static acceleration region to accelerate ions substantially along an X-direction; said pulsed ion emitter configured to emit ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;(b) a pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by a drift space; wherein electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in a Z-direction that is orthogonal to said X-direction so as to form a substantially two-dimensional electrostatic field in the XY-plane orthogonal to said Z-direction;(c) a time-of-flight detector;(d) at least one electrostatic ion deflector arranged for deflecting ion trajectories by angle ψ in the XZ plane; and(e) at least one electrode structure configured to form a local wedge electrostatic field having equipotential field lines that are tilted with respect to the Z-direction, said at least one electrode structure being arranged to steer the ion trajectories by inclination angle ϕ in the XZ plane; wherein said angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for denser folding of the ion trajectories at inclination angle α to the X-direction that is smaller than said angle α0.
  • 2. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said ion emitter comprises a continuous ion source, generating an ion beam at mean specific energy UZ in the Z-direction and an orthogonal accelerator in the form of said pulsed ion emitter for pulsed ion acceleration substantially along the X-direction to specific energy UX, thus forming ion packets emitted at said inclination angle α0=(UZ/UX)0.5 to said X-direction.
  • 3. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said ion emitter comprises a transverse ion confinement device selected from the group of: (i) a radiofrequency rectilinear multipolar ion guide; (ii) an electrostatic quadrupolar ion guide with ion beam compression and/or confinement in the X-direction; (iii) an electrostatic periodic lens; and (iv) an electrostatic ion guide having a quadrupolar field that is spatially alternated along the Z-direction.
  • 4. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein a quadrupolar field is formed within said at least one ion deflector along the Z-direction, optionally by at least one electrode structure of the group of: (i) Matsuda plates; (ii) a gate shaped deflecting electrode; (iii) side shields of the deflector with an aspect ratio under 2; (iv) toroidal sector deflection electrodes; and (v) an electrode curvature within a trans-axial wedge deflector.
  • 5. The spectrometer as in claim 4, wherein said quadrupolar field is adjustable for at least one purpose selected from the group of: (i) controlling the spatial focusing or defocusing of ion packets; (ii) arranging telescopic compression of the ion packets; (ii) compensating the second order time aberrations per Z-width in ion packets T|ZZ=0, either locally and/or globally.
  • 6. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said wedge field is located within said pulsed accelerating region and is arranged by an electrode structure selected from the group of: (i) a tilted pull, ground or push plate electrode; (ii) a tilted ion guide for spatial confinement of the ion beam within an ion storage region of the pulsed ion emitter; (iii) an auxiliary electrode around electrodes forming an ion storage region of the pulsed ion emitter for forming a non-equally penetrating fringing field through a window, or a mesh, or a gap into the ion storage region.
  • 7. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said wedge field is located within an ion retarding region of at least one of the ion mirrors and is arranged by an electrode structure selected from the group comprising: (i) a wedge-shaped slit oriented in the ZY-plane and located between mirror electrodes; (ii) at least one printed circuit board with discrete electrodes aligned in the Z-direction, connected via a resistive divider and located between mirror electrodes; (iii) a locally tilted portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror; and (iv) at least one split portion of at least one electrode of said ion mirror, connected to a separate potential.
  • 8. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein at least one of the following is provided: (i) said at least one deflector is located to receive ions after a first ion mirror reflection and optionally before a second ion mirror reflection; (ii) a lens or a trans-axial lens is provided at the exit of said pulsed ion emitter and at least one ion deflector is provided that is configured for ion packet defocusing, so as to provide telescopic compression of said ion packets; (iii) a lens located proximate one of said ion mirrors and arranged to receive ions reflected by that ion mirror in one mirror reflection and also after a second subsequent reflection from that ion mirror; (iv) a dual ion deflector arranged proximate said detector for causing the ions to bypass the detector's rim; and (v) a dual ion deflector with a spatially focusing quadrupolar field for reversing the ion drift motion in the Z-direction and compensating a tilt of the ion packet time front.
  • 9. The spectrometer as in claim 1, further comprising at least one printed circuit board, located between electrodes of at least one of said mirrors; said board having discrete electrodes, connected to each other via a resistive chain and to a voltage supply for forming a wedge or arc shaped electrostatic field within the ion retarding region of the ion mirror for altering the ion packet time-front tilt.
  • 10. The spectrometer as in claim 1 wherein electrodes of at least one of said ion mirror are made of one or more printed circuit boards having conductive pads; optionally having a rib mounted thereto for maintaining the flatness thereof.
  • 11. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for causing ions to bypass rims of said pulsed ion emitter or ion deflector.
  • 12. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for reversing ion drift motion in said Z-direction.
  • 13. The spectrometer as in claim 1, wherein said at least one electrode structure is arranged to adjust the time front tilt angle γ of said ion packets in the XZ plane, and wherein said time front tilt angle γ and said ion deflecting angle ψ are set for compensation of the ion packets time front tilt angle induced by the ion deflector.
  • 14. A multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometer comprising: (a) A pulsed ion emitter having pulsed acceleration region and static acceleration region with field strengths directed substantially along the X-direction; said pulsed source periodically emits ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;(b) A pair of parallel gridless ion mirrors separated by drift space; electrodes of said ion mirrors are substantially elongated in the Z-direction to form a substantially two-dimensional electrostatic field in the orthogonal XY-plane; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane;(c) A time-of-flight detector;(d) At least one electrically adjustable electrostatic deflector, numbered as n along the ion path and arranged for steering of ion trajectories for angles ψn, associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front;(e) At least one, numbered as m along the ion flight path, electrode structure to form an adjustable local wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines tilted with respect to the Z-direction, followed by electrostatic acceleration in Z-independent field; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time front tilt angle γm of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at a smaller inclination angle ϕm;(f) Wherein said steering angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for denser folding of major portion of ion trajectories at inclination angles α being smaller than said angle α0;(g) Wherein said time front tilt angles ψm and said ion steering angles ψn are electrically adjusted for local mutual compensations of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by individual n-th deflector, said local compensation occurring within at most pair of ion mirror reflections.
  • 15. A method of multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometry comprising: providing a spectrometer as claimed in claim 1;pulsing ions along the X-direction with the pulsed ion emitter so as to emit ion packets at said inclination angle α0;oscillating ions in the X-direction between the mirrors as the ions drift in the Z-direction; anddeflecting the ion trajectories by angle ψ in the XZ plane using the ion deflector;wherein the time front tilt angle γ of the ion packets is adjusted, and the steering angle of the ion trajectories is adjusted by inclination angle ϕ, in the XZ plane, using said wedge electrostatic field and electrostatic acceleration field so as to more densely fold the ion trajectories at inclination angle α to the X-direction that is smaller than said angle α0.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, comprising adjusting one or more voltages applied to the ion deflector and/or pulsed ion emitter so as to adjust the ion deflecting angle ψ and/or time front tilt angle γ so as to at least partially compensate for a time front tilt angle induced by the ion deflector.
  • 17. The method as in claim 15, wherein said wedge field is arranged in at least one of said ion mirrors and so as to extends in the Z-direction by a distance such that ions reflected by that mirror between 2 and 4 times pass through the wedge field.
  • 18. The method as in claim 15, comprising forming a wedge-shaped or curved electric field within the reflecting region of at least one ion mirror and along substantially the entire ion path in the Z-direction.
  • 19. The method as in claim 15, wherein said compensating of the tilt angle of the ion packets time front comprises monitoring the resolution of the spectrometer whilst adjusting said deflecting angle and/or steering angle and/or ion beam energy at the entrance of said pulsed ion emitter.
  • 20. The spectrometer as in claim 14, wherein said time front tilt angles γm and said ion steering angles ψn are electrically adjusted for the global mutual compensation at the detector face of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by misalignments of said ion source, of said ion mirrors and of said detector.
  • 21. A method of multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometry comprising the following steps: (a) Arranging pulsed acceleration region and static acceleration region with field strengths directed substantially along the X-direction within a pulsed ion emitter for periodically emitting ion packets at an inclination angle α0 to said X-direction;(b) Forming a two dimensional electrostatic field in an XY-plane, substantially elongated in first Z-direction within parallel ion mirrors electrodes separated by a drift space; said field provides for an isochronous repetitive multi-pass ion motion and spatial ion confinement along a zigzag mean ion trajectory lying within the XY symmetry plane, but without affecting ion drift motion in the Z-direction;(c) Detecting ions on a time-of-flight detector;(d) Steering of ion trajectories for electrically adjustable angles ψn, associated with equal tilting of ion packets time front within at least one electrostatic deflector, numbered as n along the ion path;(e) Forming at least one electrically adjustable local wedge electrostatic field with equipotential lines tilted with respect to the Z-direction, numbered as m along the ion flight path, followed by electrostatic acceleration in a Z-independent field; said at least one wedge field is arranged for the purpose of adjusting the time front tilt angle γm of said ion packets, associated with steering of ion trajectories at a smaller inclination angle ϕm;(f) Wherein said steering angles ψ and ϕ are arranged for either denser folding of major portion of ion trajectories at inclination angles α being smaller than said angle α0;(g) Wherein said time front tilt angles γm and said ion steering angles γn are electrically adjusted for local mutual compensations of ion packets time front tilt angle induced by individual n-th deflector, said local compensation occurring within at most pair of ion mirror reflections.
Priority Claims (7)
Number Date Country Kind
1712612 Aug 2017 GB national
1712613 Aug 2017 GB national
1712614 Aug 2017 GB national
1712616 Aug 2017 GB national
1712617 Aug 2017 GB national
1712618 Aug 2017 GB national
1712619 Aug 2017 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2018/052101 7/26/2018 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/030473 2/14/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (308)
Number Name Date Kind
3898452 Hertel Aug 1975 A
4390784 Browning et al. Jun 1983 A
4691160 Ino Sep 1987 A
4731532 Frey et al. Mar 1988 A
4855595 Blanchard Aug 1989 A
5017780 Kutscher et al. May 1991 A
5107109 Stafford, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5128543 Reed et al. Jul 1992 A
5202563 Cotter et al. Apr 1993 A
5331158 Dowell Jul 1994 A
5367162 Holland et al. Nov 1994 A
5396065 Myerholtz et al. Mar 1995 A
5435309 Thomas et al. Jul 1995 A
5464985 Cornish et al. Nov 1995 A
5619034 Reed et al. Apr 1997 A
5654544 Dresch Aug 1997 A
5689111 Dresch et al. Nov 1997 A
5696375 Park et al. Dec 1997 A
5719392 Franzen Feb 1998 A
5763878 Franzen Jun 1998 A
5777326 Rockwood et al. Jul 1998 A
5834771 Yoon et al. Nov 1998 A
5955730 Kerley et al. Sep 1999 A
5994695 Young Nov 1999 A
6002122 Wolf Dec 1999 A
6013913 Hanson Jan 2000 A
6020586 Dresch et al. Feb 2000 A
6080985 Welkie et al. Jun 2000 A
6107625 Park Aug 2000 A
6160256 Ishihara Dec 2000 A
6198096 Le Cocq Mar 2001 B1
6229142 Bateman et al. May 2001 B1
6271917 Hagler Aug 2001 B1
6300626 Brock et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316768 Rockwood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6337482 Francke Jan 2002 B1
6384410 Kawato May 2002 B1
6393367 Tang et al. May 2002 B1
6437325 Reilly et al. Aug 2002 B1
6455845 Li et al. Sep 2002 B1
6469295 Park Oct 2002 B1
6489610 Barofsky et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504148 Hager Jan 2003 B1
6504150 Verentchikov et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534764 Verentchikov et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545268 Verentchikov et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570152 Hoyes May 2003 B1
6576895 Park Jun 2003 B1
6580070 Cornish et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591121 Madarasz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614020 Cornish Sep 2003 B2
6627877 Davis et al. Sep 2003 B1
6646252 Gonin Nov 2003 B1
6647347 Roushall et al. Nov 2003 B1
6664545 Kimmel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683299 Fuhrer et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694284 Nikoonahad et al. Feb 2004 B1
6717132 Franzen Apr 2004 B2
6734968 Wang et al. May 2004 B1
6737642 Syage et al. May 2004 B2
6744040 Park Jun 2004 B2
6744042 Zajfman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6747271 Gonin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770870 Vestal Aug 2004 B2
6782342 LeGore et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787760 Belov et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794643 Russ, IV et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804003 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815673 Plomley et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833544 Campbell et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836742 Brekenfeld Dec 2004 B2
6841936 Keller et al. Jan 2005 B2
6861645 Franzen Mar 2005 B2
6864479 Davis et al. Mar 2005 B1
6870156 Rather Mar 2005 B2
6870157 Zare Mar 2005 B1
6872938 Makarov et al. Mar 2005 B2
6888130 Gonin May 2005 B1
6900431 Belov et al. May 2005 B2
6906320 Sachs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6940066 Makarov et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949736 Ishihara Sep 2005 B2
7034292 Whitehouse et al. Apr 2006 B1
7071464 Reinhold Jul 2006 B2
7084393 Fuhrer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091479 Hayek Aug 2006 B2
7126114 Chernushevich Oct 2006 B2
7196324 Verentchikov Mar 2007 B2
7217919 Boyle et al. May 2007 B2
7221251 Menegoli et al. May 2007 B2
7326925 Verentchikov et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351958 Vestal Apr 2008 B2
7365313 Fuhrer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7385187 Verentchikov et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388197 McLean et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399957 Parker et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423259 Hidalgo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7498569 Ding Mar 2009 B2
7501621 Willis et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504620 Sato et al. Mar 2009 B2
7521671 Kirihara et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541576 Belov et al. Jun 2009 B2
7582864 Verentchikov Sep 2009 B2
7608817 Flory Oct 2009 B2
7663100 Vestal Feb 2010 B2
7675031 Konicek et al. Mar 2010 B2
7709789 Vestal et al. May 2010 B2
7728289 Naya et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745780 McLean et al. Jun 2010 B2
7755036 Satoh Jul 2010 B2
7772547 Verentchikov Aug 2010 B2
7800054 Fuhrer et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825373 Willis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7863557 Brown Jan 2011 B2
7884319 Willis et al. Feb 2011 B2
7932491 Vestal Apr 2011 B2
7982184 Sudakov Jul 2011 B2
7985950 Makarov et al. Jul 2011 B2
7989759 Holle Aug 2011 B2
7999223 Makarov et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017907 Willis et al. Sep 2011 B2
8063360 Willis et al. Nov 2011 B2
8080782 Hidalgo et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093554 Makarov Jan 2012 B2
8237111 Golikov et al. Aug 2012 B2
8354634 Green et al. Jan 2013 B2
8395115 Makarov et al. Mar 2013 B2
8492710 Fuhrer et al. Jul 2013 B2
8513594 Makarov Aug 2013 B2
8633436 Ugarov Jan 2014 B2
8637815 Makarov et al. Jan 2014 B2
8642948 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8642951 Li Feb 2014 B2
8648294 Prather et al. Feb 2014 B2
8653446 Mordehai et al. Feb 2014 B1
8658984 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8680481 Giannakopulos et al. Mar 2014 B2
8723108 Ugarov May 2014 B1
8735818 Kovtoun et al. May 2014 B2
8772708 Kinugawa et al. Jul 2014 B2
8785845 Loboda Jul 2014 B2
8847155 Vestal Sep 2014 B2
8853623 Verenchikov Oct 2014 B2
8884220 Hoyes et al. Nov 2014 B2
8921772 Verenchikov Dec 2014 B2
8952325 Giles et al. Feb 2015 B2
8957369 Makarov Feb 2015 B2
8975592 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2015 B2
9048080 Verenchikov et al. Jun 2015 B2
9082597 Willis et al. Jul 2015 B2
9082604 Verenchikov Jul 2015 B2
9099287 Giannakopulos Aug 2015 B2
9136101 Grinfeld et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147563 Makarov Sep 2015 B2
9196469 Makarov Nov 2015 B2
9207206 Makarov Dec 2015 B2
9214322 Kholomeev et al. Dec 2015 B2
9214328 Hoyes et al. Dec 2015 B2
9281175 Haufler et al. Mar 2016 B2
9312119 Verenchikov Apr 2016 B2
9324544 Rather Apr 2016 B2
9373490 Nishiguchi et al. Jun 2016 B1
9396922 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2016 B2
9417211 Verenchikov Aug 2016 B2
9425034 Verentchikov et al. Aug 2016 B2
9472390 Verenchikov et al. Oct 2016 B2
9514922 Watanabe et al. Dec 2016 B2
9576778 Wang Feb 2017 B2
9595431 Verenchikov Mar 2017 B2
9673033 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9679758 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9683963 Verenchikov Jun 2017 B2
9728384 Verenchikov Aug 2017 B2
9779923 Verenchikov Oct 2017 B2
9786484 Willis et al. Oct 2017 B2
9786485 Ding et al. Oct 2017 B2
9865441 Damoc et al. Jan 2018 B2
9865445 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870903 Richardson et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870906 Quarmby et al. Jan 2018 B1
9881780 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9899201 Park Feb 2018 B1
9922812 Makarov Mar 2018 B2
9941107 Verenchikov Apr 2018 B2
9972483 Makarov May 2018 B2
10006892 Verenchikov Jun 2018 B2
10037873 Wang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10141175 Verentchikov et al. Nov 2018 B2
10141176 Stewart et al. Nov 2018 B2
10163616 Verenchikov et al. Dec 2018 B2
10186411 Makarov Jan 2019 B2
10192723 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2019 B2
10290480 Crowell et al. May 2019 B2
10373815 Crowell et al. Aug 2019 B2
10388503 Brown et al. Aug 2019 B2
10593525 Hock et al. Mar 2020 B2
10593533 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 B2
10622203 Veryovkin et al. Apr 2020 B2
10629425 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
10636646 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
20010011703 Franzen Aug 2001 A1
20010030284 Dresch et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020030159 Chernushevich et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020107660 Nikoonahad et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020190199 Li Dec 2002 A1
20030010907 Hayek et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030111597 Gonin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030232445 Fulghum Dec 2003 A1
20040084613 Bateman et al. May 2004 A1
20040108453 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119012 Vestal Jun 2004 A1
20040144918 Zare et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155187 Axelsson Aug 2004 A1
20040159782 Park Aug 2004 A1
20040183007 Belov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050006577 Fuhrer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050040326 Enke Feb 2005 A1
20050103992 Yamaguchi et al. May 2005 A1
20050133712 Belov et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050151075 Brown et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194528 Yamaguchi et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242279 Verentchikov Nov 2005 A1
20050258364 Whitehouse et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060169882 Pau et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060214100 Verentchikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060289746 Raznikov et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070023645 Chernushevich Feb 2007 A1
20070029473 Verentchikov Feb 2007 A1
20070176090 Verentchikov Aug 2007 A1
20070187614 Schneider et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194223 Sato et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080049402 Han et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080197276 Nishiguchi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080203288 Makarov et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080290269 Saito et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090090861 Willis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114808 Bateman et al. May 2009 A1
20090206250 Wollnik Aug 2009 A1
20090250607 Staats et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272890 Ogawa et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100001180 Bateman et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100044558 Sudakov Feb 2010 A1
20100072363 Giles Mar 2010 A1
20100078551 Loboda Apr 2010 A1
20100140469 Nishiguchi Jun 2010 A1
20100193682 Golikov et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207023 Loboda Aug 2010 A1
20100301202 Vestal Dec 2010 A1
20110133073 Sato et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168880 Ristroph et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180702 Flory et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180705 Yamaguchi Jul 2011 A1
20110186729 Verentchikov et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120168618 Vestal Jul 2012 A1
20120261570 Shvartsburg et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130048852 Verenchikov Feb 2013 A1
20130056627 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130068942 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130187044 Ding et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130240725 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130248702 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130256524 Brown et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130313424 Makarov et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130327935 Wiedenbeck Dec 2013 A1
20140054456 Kinugawa et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140084156 Ristroph et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140117226 Giannakopulos May 2014 A1
20140138538 Hieftje et al. May 2014 A1
20140183354 Moon et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140191123 Wildgoose et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140239172 Makarov Aug 2014 A1
20140291503 Shchepunov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140312221 Verenchikov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140361162 Murray et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150028197 Grinfeld et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150028198 Grinfeld et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150034814 Brown et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150048245 Vestal et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150060656 Ugarov Mar 2015 A1
20150122986 Haase May 2015 A1
20150194296 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150228467 Grinfeld et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150279650 Verenchikov Oct 2015 A1
20150294849 Makarov et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150318156 Loyd et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150364309 Welkie Dec 2015 A1
20150380233 Verenchikov Dec 2015 A1
20160005587 Verenchikov Jan 2016 A1
20160035558 Verenchikov et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160079052 Makarov Mar 2016 A1
20160225598 Ristroph Aug 2016 A1
20160225602 Ristroph et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160240363 Verenchikov Aug 2016 A1
20170016863 Verenchikov Jan 2017 A1
20170025265 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032952 Verenchikov Feb 2017 A1
20170098533 Stewart et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170229297 Green et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170338094 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180144921 Hoyes et al. May 2018 A1
20180315589 Oshiro Nov 2018 A1
20180366312 Hamish et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190237318 Brown Aug 2019 A1
20200083034 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200126781 Kovtoun Apr 2020 A1
20200152440 Hoyes et al. May 2020 A1
20200168447 Verenchikov May 2020 A1
20200168448 Verenchikov et al. May 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (130)
Number Date Country
2412657 May 2003 CA
101369510 Feb 2009 CN
102131563 Jul 2011 CN
201946564 Aug 2011 CN
4310106 Oct 1994 DE
10116536 Oct 2002 DE
102015121830 Jun 2017 DE
102019129108 Jun 2020 DE
112015001542 Jul 2020 DE
1137044 Sep 2001 EP
1566828 Aug 2005 EP
1901332 Mar 2008 EP
2068346 Jun 2009 EP
1665326 Apr 2010 EP
1789987 Sep 2010 EP
1522087 Mar 2011 EP
2599104 Jun 2013 EP
1743354 Aug 2019 EP
3662501 Jun 2020 EP
3662502 Jun 2020 EP
3662503 Jun 2020 EP
2080021 Jan 1982 GB
2217907 Nov 1989 GB
2300296 Oct 1996 GB
2390935 Jan 2004 GB
2396742 Jun 2004 GB
2403063 Dec 2004 GB
2455977 Jul 2009 GB
2476964 Jul 2011 GB
2478300 Sep 2011 GB
2484361 Apr 2012 GB
2484429 Apr 2012 GB
2489094 Sep 2012 GB
2490571 Nov 2012 GB
2495127 Apr 2013 GB
2495221 Apr 2013 GB
2496991 May 2013 GB
2496994 May 2013 GB
2500743 Oct 2013 GB
2501332 Oct 2013 GB
2506362 Apr 2014 GB
2528875 Feb 2016 GB
2555609 May 2018 GB
2556451 May 2018 GB
2556830 Jun 2018 GB
2562990 Dec 2018 GB
2575157 Jan 2020 GB
2575339 Jan 2020 GB
S6229049 Feb 1987 JP
2000036285 Feb 2000 JP
2000048764 Feb 2000 JP
2003031178 Jan 2003 JP
3571546 Sep 2004 JP
2005538346 Dec 2005 JP
2006049273 Feb 2006 JP
2007227042 Sep 2007 JP
2010062152 Mar 2010 JP
4649234 Mar 2011 JP
2011119279 Jun 2011 JP
4806214 Nov 2011 JP
2013539590 Oct 2013 JP
5555582 Jul 2014 JP
2015506567 Mar 2015 JP
2015185306 Oct 2015 JP
2564443 Oct 2015 RU
2015148627 May 2017 RU
2660655 Jul 2018 RU
198034 Sep 1991 SU
1681340 Sep 1991 SU
1725289 Apr 1992 SU
0237259 Sep 1987 WO
9103071 Mar 1991 WO
98001218 Jan 1998 WO
98008244 Feb 1998 WO
0077823 Dec 2000 WO
2005001878 Jan 2005 WO
2006049623 May 2006 WO
2006102430 Sep 2006 WO
2006103448 Oct 2006 WO
2007044696 Apr 2007 WO
2007104992 Sep 2007 WO
2007136373 Nov 2007 WO
2008046594 Apr 2008 WO
2008087389 Jul 2008 WO
2010008386 Jan 2010 WO
2010138781 Dec 2010 WO
2011086430 Jul 2011 WO
2011107836 Sep 2011 WO
2011135477 Nov 2011 WO
2012010894 Jan 2012 WO
2012023031 Feb 2012 WO
2012024468 Feb 2012 WO
2012024570 Feb 2012 WO
2012116765 Sep 2012 WO
2013045428 Apr 2013 WO
2013063587 May 2013 WO
2013067366 May 2013 WO
2013093587 Jun 2013 WO
2013098612 Jul 2013 WO
2013110587 Aug 2013 WO
2013110588 Aug 2013 WO
2013124207 Aug 2013 WO
2014021960 Feb 2014 WO
2014074822 May 2014 WO
2014110697 Jul 2014 WO
2014142897 Sep 2014 WO
2015142897 Sep 2015 WO
2015152968 Oct 2015 WO
2015153622 Oct 2015 WO
2015153630 Oct 2015 WO
2015153644 Oct 2015 WO
2015175988 Nov 2015 WO
2016064398 Apr 2016 WO
2016174462 Nov 2016 WO
2018073589 Apr 2018 WO
2018109920 Jun 2018 WO
2018124861 Jul 2018 WO
2019030472 Feb 2019 WO
2019030474 Feb 2019 WO
2019030475 Feb 2019 WO
2019030476 Feb 2019 WO
2019030477 Feb 2019 WO
2019058226 Mar 2019 WO
2019162687 Aug 2019 WO
2019202338 Oct 2019 WO
2019229599 Dec 2019 WO
2020002940 Jan 2020 WO
2020021255 Jan 2020 WO
2020121167 Jun 2020 WO
2020121168 Jun 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (76)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062174 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages.
IPRP PCT/US2016/062174 dated May 22, 2018, 6 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520130.4 dated May 25, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062203 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520134.6 dated May 26, 2016.
IPRP PCT/US2016/062203, dated May 22, 2018, 6 pages.
Search Report Under Section 17(5) for Application No. GB1507363.8 dated Nov. 9, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Jul. 12, 2016, 16 pages.
IPRP for application PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Oct. 31, 2017, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063076 dated Mar. 30, 2017, 9 pages.
Search Report for GB Application No. 1520540.4 dated May 24, 2016.
IPRP for application PCT/US2016/063076, dated May 29, 2018, 7 pages.
IPRP PCT/GB17/51981 dated Jan. 8, 2019, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages.
Author unknown, “Electrostatic lens,” Wikipedia, Mar. 31, 2017 (Mar. 31, 2017), XP055518392, Retrieved from the Internet URL https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Electrostaticlens oldid=773161674[retrieved on Oct. 24, 2018].
Hussein, O.A. et al., “Study the most favorable shapes of electrostatic quadrupole doublet lenses”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1815, Feb. 17, 2017 (Feb. 17, 2017), p. 110003.
Guan S., et al., “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide”, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1):101-106 (1996).
Scherer, S., et al., “A novel principle for an ion mirror design in time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 251, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052104, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052105, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052100, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 19 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052102, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052099, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052101, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 15 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807605.9, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 6 pages.
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807626.5, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 8 pages.
Yavor, M.I., et al., “High performance gridless ion mirrors for multi-reflection time-of-flight and electrostatic trap mass analyzers”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 426, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-11.
Search Report under Section 17(5) for application GB1707208.3, dated Oct. 12. 2017, 6 pages.
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/01118, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 25 pages.
Doroshenko, V.M., and Cotter, R.J., “Ideal velocity focusing in a reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(10):992-999 (1999).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Enhanced Mass Accuracy in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” www.waters.com/posters, ASMS Conference (2017).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Multiplexed Operation of an Orthogonal Multi-Reflecting TOF Instrument to Increase Duty Cycle by Two Orders” ASMS Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 6, 2018.
Kozlov, B. et al. “High accuracy self-calibration method for high resolution mass spectra” ASMS Conference Abstract, 2019.
Kozlov, B. et al. “Fast Ion Mobility Spectrometry and High Resolution TOF MS” ASMS Conference Poster (2014).
Verenchicov, A. N. “Parallel MS-MS Analysis in a Time-Flight Tandem. Problem Statement, Method, and Instrumental Schemes” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004).
Yavor, M. I. “Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Analyzer with Unlimited Mass Range” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004).
Khasin, Y. I. et al., “Initial Experimental Studies of a Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004).
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Stability of Ion Motion in Periodic Electrostatic Fields” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004).
Verenchicov, A. N. “The Concept of Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer for Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Verenchicov, A. N., et al. “Accurate Mass Measurements for Interpreting Spectra of atmospheric Pressure Ionization” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Experimental Studies of Space Charge Effects in Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometes” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer With an Ion Trap Source” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Hasin, Y. I., et al., “Planar Time-Of-Flight Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer with an Orthogonal Ion Injection Out of Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Lutvinsky, Y. I. et al., “Estimation of Capacity of High Resolution Mass Spectra for Analysis of Complex Mixtures” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006).
Verenchicov., A. N. et al. “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22 (2017).
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16869126.9, dated Jun. 13, 2019.
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16866997.6, dated Jun. 7, 2019.
Wikipedia “Reflectron”, Oct. 9, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet URL https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reflectron&oldid=684843442 [retrieved on May 29, 2019].
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International appliication No. PCT/GB2020/050209, dated Apr. 28, 2020, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for EP Patent Application No. 16866997.6 dated Oct. 16, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051234 dated Jul. 29, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051839 dated Sep. 18, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/0051320 dated Aug. 1, 2018.
Stresau, D., et al., “Ion Counting Beyond 10ghz Using a New Detector and Conventional Electronics”, European Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Feb. 4-8, 2001, Lillehammer, Norway, Retrieved from the Internet URL htps://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/21 [retrieved on Jul. 31, 2019].
Kaufmann, R., et. al., “Sequencing of peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer: evaluation of postsource decay following matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI)”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam, NL, 131:355-385, Feb. 24, 1994.
Shaulis, Barry, et al., “Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS”, G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(11):1-12, Nov. 20, 2010.
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1708430.2 dated Nov. 28, 2017.
Sakurai, T, et al., “A new multi-passage time-of-flight mass spectrometer at JAIST”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 427(1-2):182-186 (1999).
IPRP for International application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/070508 dated Oct. 16, 2017, 17 pages.
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1613988.3 dated Jan. 5, 2017, 4 pages.
Wouters et al., “Optical Design of the TOFI (Time-of-Flight Isochronous) Spectrometer for Mass Measurements of Exotic Nuclei”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 240(1): 77-90, Oct. 1, 1985.
Combined Search and Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1901411.7 dated Jul. 31, 2019.
Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1618980.5 dated Jul. 25, 2019.
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB 1906258.7, dated Oct. 25, 2019.
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1906253.8, dated Oct. 30, 2019.
Search Report under Section 17(5) for G81916445.8, dated Jun. 15, 2020.
Toyoda et al., “Multi-Turn-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectometers with Electrostatic Sectors”, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 38: 1125-1142, Jan. 1, 2003.
Author unknown, “Einzel Lens”, Wikipedia [online] Nov. 2020 [retrieved on Nov. 3, 2020]. Retrieved from Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einzel_lens, 2 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051235, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 22 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051416, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 22 pages.
Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 7 pages.
Wollnik, H., and Casares, A., “An energy-isochronous multi-pass time-of-flight mass spectrometer consisting of two coaxial electrostatic mirrors”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 227(2):217-222 (2003) Abstract.
Carey, D.C., “Why a second-order magnetic optical achromat works”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 189(2-3):365-367 (1981). Abstract.
Sakurai, et al., “Ion optics for time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiple symmetry”, Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Proc 63(2-3):273-287 (1985). Abstract.
Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated May 5, 2021, 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200168448 A1 May 2020 US