Patent Application
20140042342
There are applications where it can be desirable to use a flash lamp on a sheet of material for sintering, annealing, or otherwise treating a sheet. This treatment can be performed by providing a number of flash lamps that provide a wide footprint (area where energy is received), such as with an elongated U-shaped lamp, and flashed rapidly with low energy per pulse. This approach can ensure that all parts of the sheet are treated with a sufficient amount of energy, although it can be wasteful of energy and not adaptive.
This disclosure relates to a system designed to apply a group of flash lamps to a workpiece in a continuous motion processes, including workpieces with a sheet-like form as well as individual, separated components. The system can identify optimal relationships among various parameters, including one or more of the speed of the target material (workpiece), a delay parameter, the physical spacing of the flash lamps, lamp footprint, lamp pitch, percent of lamp overlap, pulse frequency, and the flash sequence of the lamps.
The systems and methods include the ability to dynamically alter one or more parameters in response to a change in conditions. This change can result, for example, from a lamp becoming disabled, a change in conveyor speed, or a change in the output result, such as a change measured by a sensor.
This disclosure further shows how this system can be applied to design practical sintering/annealing/curing systems. This can include providing flashes with relatively high energy at relatively low frequency, such as less than 50 Hz, or further less than 10 Hz.
Other features will become apparent from the following description, drawings, and claims.
The system described here is designed primarily for systems in which a workpiece is provided in a continuous process, e.g., in a sheet, although it could be applied to a continuous motion of individual items, such as spaced apart pieces or material One application is for a process, such as a roll-to-roll process, where a sheet of material is sintered, cured, or otherwise processed by the flash lamps providing energy, whether from visible light, ultraviolet radiation, or infrared radiation. In one example of an implementation, printed electronic circuits are provided as a conductive “ink” with small conductive particles on a low temperature substrate, such as paper or a thin plastic, and the ink is sintered to fuse the conductive particles. This idea of sintering small particles with lamps or lasers has been known for a long time; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,151,008.
In the system described here, the system has multiple flash lamps, typically three or more in a one-dimensional array, that can operate on a continuous conveyor. The system could have lamps arranged in a two-dimensional array with rows of lamps aligned or offset.
Referring to
The systems described here are designed to provide a desired amount of energy to a sheet of material moving in a continuous manner, such that the material is provided with energy in desired locations, e.g., across a continuous area, and preferably in an efficient manner that provides some margin for error, but is not overly wasteful of energy. Referring to
Referring to
Some of the terms and parameters that are used in this system include:
Delay (n): a time interval starting when the target material first enters the footprint of lamp(1) and ending when lamp(n) is first flashed.
Frequency: the flash rate expressed in flashes per second (Hz). All lamps are typically pulsed at the same frequency, although they could be different.
Lamp Footprint: the width of the optical beam created by a single lamp (note that the figures do not show the lamp footprint and the lamp pitch or offset to scale). The width is generally modeled as a Gaussian curve, so some judgment may be used regarding the actual width of the footprint and where that is defined. This determination can be a function of the material and the process; e.g., based on a relationship between the energy that will typically work compared to the peak energy to be used. This part of the user interface is shown in close-up
Lamp Offset (n): the distance between the optical centerline of the first lamp to the optical center of the n-th lamp as shown in
Lamp Pitch: the distance from the optical center of one lamp to the optical center of the adjacent lamp when the optical center of all lamps is equal distance to its nearest neighbor. This is shown in
Number of Lamps: the quantity of flash lamps being used to in the curing process.
Period: the time interval between consecutive flashes of the same lamp; the period is the inverse of the frequency of flashes.
Roll Speed: the linear velocity of the target material as it transverses under the lamps.
% Lamp Overlap: a measure of the extent that an area on the targeted material is exposed to the light from more than one lamp flash as indicated in the table of examples below:
Relevant formulas include the following:
Period=1/Frequency (1)
Frequency=(Roll Speed/Number of Lamps)/(1−% Lamp Overlap) (2)
Delay (1)=+Lamp Footprint/Roll Speed (3)
For N>1. Delay (n)=Delay (1)+(Lamp Offset(n)+(Lamp Footprint ×(1−% Lamp Overlap)))/Roll Speed (4)
Delay (n)=Delay (1)+(((n−1)×Lamp Pitch)+(Lamp Footprint ×(1−% Lamp Overlap)))/Roll Speed (5)
There are a number of error conditions. The frequency could be too high. Design limitations determine the maximum frequency any flash lamp can be operated. Limiting parameters include lamp size and shape, gas fill pressure, power supply wattage, lamp cooling, and lamp re-strike times. The system can enable the flash frequency to be calculated and controlled. Potential improper operation can be prevented. A frequency error is provided when Frequency>Max limit.
Another error condition can be high line current. Flash lamps operate by charging a capacitor then discharging the current through the lamp. It is generally desirable to charge so that flashing occurs soon after the capacitor is charge. Thus, in an efficient system, there will often be a correlation between the flashing times and the charging times, even though they are not strictly related. If multiple capacitors are being charged at the same time, and therefore also in some cases flashing at the same time, the instantaneous current can be very high. These peak currents can be significantly reduced by staggering the times that the capacitors are charged. The system determines a flash sequence such that the capacitors can be charged and discharged efficiently, without charging capacitors at the same time, and overcurrent conditions can thus be prevented. A high current error is indicated when Delay(n)/period is an integer or very close to an integer value. As shown in
The system can include speed sensors, e.g., a tachometer, to monitor the actual speed of the conveyor, in case it deviates from the expected speed. The controller can make adjustments to the parameters in response, and in some systems, may also control the line speed, which in theory should be as high as the system will allow. Calibration and/or test regions can be provided on the conveyor and/or on the target material and read visually or in some other automated manner to determine that the desired energy is being provided and in the desired places. If read in an automated manner, the data can be fed back to the controller to make adjustments to the flash sequence and/or line speed. Thus as indicated above, the system can sense changes in conditions, such as the line speed or a lamp failure, and automatically make adjustments to the parameters.
The control system described here can enable the use of low frequency pulse lamps for continuous motion processes through determining a frequency, sequence, and timing for the lamps; determine and control the flash sequence of a series lamps to insure uniform processing of the target material; automatically adjust the frequency and flash sequence for variations in conveyor speed, starts and stops; adjust the frequency and flash sequence when one or more lamps are removed for maintenance or an additional lamp is added to the system; identify and avoid high line current conditions; identify and avoid operating conditions that could damage the lamp or power supply; and provide for a desired level of overlap in the area that is flashed.
There are a number of possible advantages of the systems and methods described here. By adding lamps and providing the ability to make adjustments as a result, the production speed can be increased. The production system can be dynamically reconfigured to maintain a level of production when one or more lamps fail; that is, it can adjust the frequency, sequence, and timing of the lamps. This means that processing can continue until a desirable opportunity to replace a lamp while still providing sufficient energy to all desired parts of the workpiece. The production system can also automatically adjust for starts, stops and variations in conveyor speeds through feedback, such as from a tachometer, or from other conditions, such as if a sensor detects a possible flaw in the output. The peak current draw can be reduced by staggering the pulse sequence. The wattage of the individual lamps can be reduced and the life of the individual lamps life extended by using more lamps, each operating at a lower pulse rate, such as at 50 Hz or less (20 flashes per second), or 10 Hz or less (10 flashes per second).
Compared to continuous mercury lamps, these flash lamp systems and methods provide less heat with much higher peak power, which is a generally known benefit of flash lamps. Compared to pseudo-synchronized flash lamp systems, these flash lamp systems and methods can provide a lower peak current draw.
The controller or control system can use any appropriate form of processing, including microcontroller, microprocessor, ASIC, special purpose processor, general purpose computer, group of computers, etc., referred to here generally as a “processor.” The processor communicates with the interface, controls the lamps, and communicates with sensors, such as the tachometer.
For the examples below, pictures of the user display are shown in the incorporated provisional application.
Input parameters—Reference Values
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=20 ft/min (6 m/min)
Outputs include a frequency of 0.5333 Hz, which is less than once per second.
In this example, roll speed is doubled compared to Reference (Example 1).
Input parameters:
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=40 ft/min (12 m/min)
As a result, the frequency is doubled to 1.066667 Hz.
In this example, the number of lamps is reduced compared to Reference, causing the frequency of flashes from each lamp to be doubled to 1.06667 Hz.
Input parameters
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=20 ft/min (6 m/min)
In this example, an increase in % Lamp Overlap increases lamp frequency compared to Reference. As a result, the frequency increases to 0.8 Hz.
Input parameters
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=20 ft/min
This example indicates a frequency error by trying to turn the conveyor speed too high. Since the parameter values led to a frequency greater than the maximum 10 Hz that the lamp can handle it led to a fault condition indicated by the ‘Parameter out of range’ indication. turning Red. Lamp flashing is inhibited at this time.
Input parameters
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=100 ft/min (30 m/min)
This example demonstrates a high current error. Since the lamps were calculated to flash too close to simultaneously, a ‘Parameter out of range’ indicator goes off (e.g., by turning red).
Input parameters
Speed: provided from a tachometer on the system=30 ft/min (9 m/min)
Lamp Overlap=0.75
This application claims priority under §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/681,984, entitled “Flash Lamps in a Continuous Motion Process,” filed Aug. 10, 2012; the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61681984 | Aug 2012 | US |
