1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to semiconductor integrated circuit fabrication and, more particularly, to improved processes for fabricating MOS field effect transistors having graded lightly doped drain and source regions.
2. State of the Art
Semiconductor integrated circuits are comprised of a plurality of devices which invariably include transistors. Transistors are of two general types, namely bipolar and field effect transistors (FETs).
MOSFETs in combination with other devices commonly form dynamic random access memory circuits (DRAM) used in memory systems such as computers. Because of the continuous demand for the further miniaturization and speed increase of DRAMs, MOSFET devices have been scaled to the point where the channel length from source to drain falls below 0.5 micron (sub-half micron). As the channel shrinks, the maximum electric field (E-field) in the channel region increases, thereby resulting in higher substrate current and short/long term hot electron reliability problems. Electrons traveling through the channel become more energized by the E-field and have a greater tendency to cross into the gate region 6 and become trapped. These problems are discussed in detail in “Silicon Processing For The VLSI Era-Volume 2,”Lattice Press, 1990, pp 428-441.
The reference cited above also discusses various methods employed to partially overcome these problems and maximize performance and reliability. One common method involves adding a first lightly doped region between the drain and channel regions and a second lightly doped region between the source and channel regions.
However, as the devices get smaller, and FET channels become shorter than 0.4 microns, limitations on fabrication precision result in structures that are far from the ideal one shown in FIG. 3. Due to its high diffusivity, the phosphorous in the N-regions further diffuses into the channel during the high heat drive processes required to create the N+ source and drain regions. This causes severe short channel problems resulting in increased sub-threshold leakage which adversely affects refresh time in DRAMs.
An alternative to the phosphorous LDD (phos-LDD) approach is to use arsenic to create the LDD structures as proposed by H. R. Grinolds, et al. in “Reliability and Performance of Submicron LDD NMOSFET's with Buried-As n-Impurity Profiles,” IEDM Tech. Dig., 1985, pp. 246-249 and by C.-Y. Wei, et al. in “Buried and Graded/Buried LDD Structures for Improved Hot-Electron Reliability,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. EDL-7, np. Jun. 6, 1986.
The fabrication processes required to create an arsenic LDD (As-LDD) proceed similarly to the phosphorous LDD processes.
In
Since low diffusivity arsenic was used to create the N-LDD regions, the resulting LDD structures are much more predictable and do not suffer from the short channel problems plaguing phosphorous LDD structures. However, arsenic's low diffusivity also causes the N-LDD regions 24, 25 to have an abrupt end 26, 27 below the edges of the gate region 6. This abruptness creates an E-field which is still unsuitable in sub half-micron devices due to the resulting hot electron reliability problem.
To alleviate this problem, a combination phos/As LDD structure has been developed where a phos-LDD implant occurs immediately after an As-LDD implant to grade the channel to LDD junction. Again, due to the diffusivity of phosphorous, during subsequent processing, the short channel characteristics are degraded.
Another method to reduce the E-field involves burying the drain/channel and source/channel junctions.
It would be desirable, therefore, to have a process which produces a sub half-micron MOSFET with a low E-field and improved short channel characteristics and reliability in an efficient and economical manner.
The primary and secondary objects of this invention are to provide a process for creating reliable and inexpensive sub-half-micron NMOSFETs.
These and other objects are achieved by a process wherein a low dosage N-phosphorous implant occurs after the high dosage N+ arsenic implant and drive which creates the source and drain.
Referring now to the drawings,
After the sacrificial oxide layer is removed,
A gate definition etch is performed resulting in the structure of
In
Next, in
Next, as seen in
Further steps to realize the completed MOSFET involve steps familiar in the art such as the deposition of a layer of boro-phospho-silicate glass (BPSG), reflow and formation of conductive contacts to the source and drains.
The finished MOSFET exhibits a reduced E-field due to the phosphorous grading of the junctions. Since the phosphorous is implanted late in processing, its diffusive nature is more controlled, allowing for a reliable sub-half-micron device. The elimination of numerous steps, along with the self-aligned nature of the existing steps, results in achieving the previously economically unfeasible sub-half-micron MOSFET.
Another advantage is that the phosphorous implant after the source/drain formation allows grades in the junction between the N+ regions and the boron halo implant, resulting in reduced junction leakage and less N+ junction capacitance.
A possible disadvantage to this scheme involves the addition of a mask to protect in-process devices located on other areas of the wafer during this low-dosage phosphorous implant. A typical area sensitive to phosphorous would be the array on an in-process DRAM chip where field oxide regions are narrow. However, in processes where the spacer etch is performed after the cell poly etch, the array will not be exposed because it is still covered with photoresist at that point. In this case, no extra mask would be required.
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been described, modifications can be made and other embodiments may be devised without departing from the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/649,246, filed Aug. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,141 B1, issued Sep. 10, 2002, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/819,172 filed Mar. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,813, issued Dec. 12, 2000, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/539,385, filed Oct. 5, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,719,424, issued Feb. 17, 1998.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. MDA972-92-C-0054 awarded by Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4939386 | Shibata et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949136 | Jain | Aug 1990 | A |
5021851 | Haken et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5217910 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218221 | Okumura | Jun 1993 | A |
5376566 | Gonzalez | Dec 1994 | A |
5716862 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719424 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726479 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5770505 | Om et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6046472 | Ahmad et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6159813 | Ahmad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6448141 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6-13401 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-132489 | May 1994 | JP |
WO9419830 | Sep 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020182813 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08539385 | Oct 1995 | US |
Child | 08819172 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09649246 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 10198941 | US | |
Parent | 08819172 | Mar 1997 | US |
Child | 09649246 | US |