1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture and, more particularly, to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which imposes tensile and compressive stresses in the device during device fabrication.
2. Background Description
Mechanical stresses within a semiconductor device substrate can modulate device performance. That is, stresses within a semiconductor device are known to enhance semiconductor device characteristics. Thus, to improve the characteristics of a semiconductor device, tensile and/or compressive stresses are created in the channel of the n-type devices (e.g., NFETs) and/or p-type devices (e.g., PFETs). However, the same stress component, either tensile stress or compressive stress, discriminatively affects the characteristics of an n-type device and a p-type device.
For example, it has been known that a device exhibits better performance characteristics when formed on a silicon layer (or cap) that is epitaxially grown on another epitaxially grown SiGe layer that has relaxed on top of the silicon substrate. In this system, the silicon cap experiences biaxial tensile strain. When epitaxially grown on silicon, an unrelaxed SiGe layer will have a lattice constant that conforms to that of the silicon substrate. Upon relaxation (through a high temperature process for example) the SiGe lattice constant approaches that of its intrinsic lattice constant which is larger than that of silicon. A fully relaxed SiGe layer has a lattice constant close to that of its intrinsic value. When the silicon layer is epitaxially grown thereon, the silicon layer conforms to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer and this applies physical biaxial stress (e.g., expansion) to the silicon layer being formed thereon. This physical stress applied to the silicon layer is beneficial to the devices (e.g., CMOS devices) formed thereon because the expanded silicon layer increases N type device performance and a higher Ge concentration in the SiGe layer improves P type device performances.
Relaxation in SiGe on silicon substrates occurs through the formation of misfit dislocations. For a perfectly relaxed substrate, one can envision a grid of misfit dislocations equally spaced that relieve the stress. The misfit dislocations facilitate the lattice constant in the SiGe layer to seek its intrinsic value by providing extra half-planes of silicon in the substrate. The mismatch strain across the SiGe/silicon interface is then accommodated and the SiGe lattice constant is allowed to get larger.
However, the problem with this conventional approach is that it requires a multi-layered SiGe buffer layer that is very thick (e.g., a thickness of approximately 5000 Å to 15000 Å) to achieve misfit dislocations on its surface portion while avoiding threading dislocations between the SiGe layer and the silicon substrate layer, thereby achieving a relaxed SiGe structure on the surface of the multi-layered SiGe layer. Also, this approach significantly increases manufacturing time and costs. Further, the thick graded SiGe buffer layer cannot be easily applicable to silicon-on-insulator substrate (SOI). This is because for silicon-on-insulator the silicon thickness has to be below 1500 Å for the benefits of SOI to be valid. The SiGe buffered layer structure is too thick.
Another problem is that misfit dislocations formed between the SiGe layer and the silicon epitaxial layer are random and highly non-uniform and cannot be easily controlled due to heterogeneous nucleation that cannot be easily controlled. Also, misfit dislocation densities are significantly different from one place to another. Thus, the physical stress derived from the non-uniform misfit dislocations are apt to be also highly non-uniform in the silicon epitaxial layer, and this non-uniform stress causes non-uniform benefits for performance with larger variability. Further at those locations where misfit density is high, the defects degrade device performances through shorting device terminals and through other significant leakage mechanisms.
It is also known to grow Si:C epitaxially on Si where it is inherently tensile. A 1% C content in a Si:C/Si material stack can cause tensile stress levels in the Si:C on the order of 500 MPa. In comparison, in the SiGe/Si system about 6% Ge is needed to causes a 500 MPa compression. This 1% level of C can be incorporated into Si during epitaxial growth as shown in Ernst et al., VLSI Symp., 2002, p92. In Ernst et al., Si/Si:C/Si layered channels for nFETs are shown. However in the Ernst et al. structure, the Si:C is provided in the traditional strained Si approach as a stack of layers in the channel. Thus, in the Ernst et al, structure, the Si:C is used as part of the channel, itself. The problem with this approach is that the mobility is not enhanced, but retarded depending on the C content from scattering.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor structure includes forming a p-type field-effect-transistor (pFET) channel and a negative field-effect-transistor (nFET) channel in a substrate. A pFET stack and an nFET stack are formed on the substrate associated with the respective channels. A first layer of material is provided at source/drain regions associated with the pFET stack, The first layer of material has a lattice constant different than a base lattice constant of the substrate to create a compressive state within the pFET channel. A second layer of material is provided at the source/drain regions associated with the nFET stack. The second layer of material has a lattice constant different than the base lattice constant of the substrate to create a tensile state at the nFET channel.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor structure is provided which includes forming a p-type field-effect-transistor (pFET) channel and a negative field-effect-transistor (nFET) channel in a substrate. A pFET structure and an nFET structure are formed on the substrate associated with the pFET channel and the nFET channel, respectively. The regions of the pFET structure and the nFET structure are etched to a predetermined depth. A first material with a lattice constant different than the base lattice constant of the layer is provided in the etched regions of the pFET structure to provide a compressive stress in the pFET channel. A second material with a lattice constant different than the base lattice constant of the layer is provided in the etched regions of the nFET structure to provide a tensile stress in the nFET channel. Doping source and drain regions of the nFET and pFET structures is provided.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor structure includes a semiconductor substrate, and a pFET and nFET are formed in respective channels in the substrate. A first layer of material in source and drain regions of the pFET channel has a lattice constant different than the lattice constant of the substrate. A second layer of material in source and drain regions of the nFET channel has a lattice constant different than the lattice constant of the substrate.
The invention is directed to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which provides tensile stresses near the nFET channel and compressive stresses near the pFET channel of CMOS devices. In one embodiment of the invention, the longitudinal tensile stresses are brought very close to the nFET channel while at the same time compressive stresses are brought very close to the pFET channel. Additionally, in the invention, a process and structure is provided to integrate both SiGe and Si:C materials into CMOS technology.
By way of example, a highly tensile Si:C film is provided (e.g., embedded) in the silicon substrate in the source/drain (S/D) regions to longitudinally apply tension on the nFET structure in the channel under the gate region thereof. Similarly, a highly compressive SiGe film is provided (e.g., embedded) in the silicon substrate in the S/D regions to longitudinally apply compression on the pFET in the channel under the gate region thereof. Similar to the SiGe layer, the Si:C layer is relatively thin (below its critical thickness) and is not relaxed. The transistor channel region of the nFET is strained by the stress from the Si:C layer, while the channel region of the pFET is provided with compressive stress from the SiGe.
Since the SiGe layer is embedded in the S/D region of the pFET, low resistance silicide can still be formed. Interestingly, embedded (e.g., sub-surface or coplanar-to-surface) Si:C films can put larger stresses than the above-surface Si:C counterparts because of the film surface not being free. In this invention, the different thicknesses and protrusions of the Si:C, whether embedded or coplanar with the surface or raised, are contemplated. It should be understood that by adjusting the concentrations of the Ge content in the SiGe layer, it is possible to adjust the compressive stress in the pFET channel. Similarly, it is possible to adjust the tensile stress in the nFET channel by adjusting the concentrations of C in the Si:C layer. This is due to the lattice constant of such materials.
In the invention, it is shown that Si:C has a correct stress, that it includes the correct amount of C content, and that it can be grown epitaxially and selectively. Also, in the invention, the Si:C is not used as a directly built up stacked layer under the channel but as a replacement material for nFET S/D regions that are in tension and therefore imposing tension in the channel region. This Si:C film therefore applies tensile stress to nFET channels while the SiGe applies compressive stress to the pFET channels.
Still referring to
In
Regions about the pFET stack 40a are etched to the liner 50, The liner 50 is then etched and S/D regions 52 are formed (etched) adjacent the stack 40a. The depth of S/D regions 52 is about 20 to 100 nm, depending on the thickness of the SOI layer, A highly compressive selective epitaxial SiGe layer 60 is grown in the regions 52 of the pFET stack 40a as shown in
Standing alone, the SiGe normally has a larger lattice constant than the SOI. That is, the lattice constant of the SiGe material does not match the lattice constant of the Si. However, in the structure of the invention, due to the growth of the SiGe layer, the lattice structure of the SiGe layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the underlying Si. This results in the SiGe layer and the channel regions adjacent or next to the SiGe being under compression. In one embodiment, the Ge content of the SiGe layer may be greater than 0% and upwards ratio to the Si content.
Still referring to the processing of the invention, in
A mask 51 is then formed over the pFET stack 40a, and the regions about the nFET stack 45a are etched to the liner 50. The liner is then etched and S/D regions 54 are formed (etched) adjacent the stack 45a. The depth of the S/D regions 54 is about 20 to 100 nm, depending on the thickness of the SOI layer. Any well known process may be used to etch the regions 54.
A highly tensile selective epitaxial Si:C layer is grown to a thickness of about 10 to 100 nm thick in the regions 54 of the nFET stack 45a as shown in
Standing alone, Si:C would normally have a smaller lattice constant than the underlying Si. That is, the lattice constant of the Si:C material does not match the lattice constant of the Si. However, in the structure of the invention, due to the growth of the Si:C layer within the S/D regions of the nFET stack 45a, the lattice structure of the Si:C layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the underlying Si. This results in the Si:C layer and the channel regions adjacent or next to the Si:C being under a tensile stress.
In one embodiment, the Si:C and/or the SiGe layer may be embedded within the device by, example, performing a RIE, wet etching or other processes or combinations thereof for processing optimization to recess such layers. Then, Si is selectively grown over the regions 52 and 54 using any well known process. Source and drain implanting may then be performed using any well process. Further processing can be performed to build the devices and interconnects.
As now should be understood, both the Si:C and SiGe layers may be embedded within the device or can be coplanar or raised from the device. In one embodiment, the Si:C and SiGe films are deposited to 10 to 100 nm thick, which provides a more cost-effective way to add stress (compressive or tensile) to the MOSFETs. In the raised embodiment, the Si:C and SiGe layers may be raised above the surface of the device to about 50 nm. It should be recognized that other thicknesses are also contemplated by the invention.
Also, it is also possible to in situ doping the SiGe with P type doping and Si:C with n type doping to form your source and drain regions of the pFET and nFET, respectively.
It should also be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the process steps of
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications and in the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the invention can be readily applicable to bulk substrates.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/446,609, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,698, filed on Apr. 13, 2012, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/782,429, filed on Jul. 24, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,168,489, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/689,506, filed on Oct. 20, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,303,949, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsauer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5960297 | Saki | Sep 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidous | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103563 | Lukanc | Aug 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6165826 | Chau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265317 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284623 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319794 | Akatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403486 | Lou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461936 | Von Ehrenwall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475869 | Yu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509618 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6573172 | En et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724019 | Oda et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6774409 | Baba et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6891192 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6921913 | Yeo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946371 | Langdo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955952 | Yeo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982465 | Kumagai et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022561 | Huang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7105394 | Hachimine et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7208362 | Chidambaram | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20010009784 | Ma et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010036709 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086497 | Kwok | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090791 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125502 | Baba et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030022460 | Park | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057184 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067035 | Tews et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080361 | Murthy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040108533 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113174 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173815 | Yeo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040235236 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253776 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256614 | Ouyang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050035470 | Ko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051851 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184345 | Lin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060017138 | Ting | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4233236 | Apr 1993 | DE |
6476755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2002270826 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003086708 | Mar 2003 | JP |
477025 | Feb 2002 | TW |
WO0243151 | May 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Application No. 2006-536715 Filing Date: Oct. 19, 2004 Information Materials for IDS cited from JPO Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Search Reporting and Written Opinion for PCT/US04/34562, dated Mar. 15, 2007. |
G. Zhang, et al., “A New ‘Mixed-Mode’ Reliability Degradation Mechanism in Advanced Si and SiGe Bipolar Transistors.” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 2151-2156. |
H.S. Momose, et al., “Temperature Dependence of Emitter-Base Reverse Stress Degradation and its Mechanism Analyzed by MOS Structures,” 1989 IEEE, Paper 6.2, pp. 140-143. |
C.J. Huang, et al., “Temperature Dependence and Post-Stress Recovery of Hot Electron Degradation Effects in Bipolar Transistors.” IEEE 1991, Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting 7.5, pp. 170-173. |
S.R. Sheng, et al., “Degradation and Recovery of SiGe HBTs Following Radiation and Hot-Carrier Stressing.” pp. 14-15. |
Z. Yang, et al., “Avalanche Current Induced Hot Carrier Degradation in 200 GHz SiGe Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors,” pp. 1-5. |
H. Li, et al., “Design of W-Band VCOs with High Output Power for Potential Application in 77 GHz Automotive Radar Systems.” 2003, IEEE GaAs Digest, pp. 263-266. |
H. Wurzer, et al., “Annealing of Degraded non-Transistors-Mechanisms and Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 533-538. |
B. Doyle, et al., “Recovery of Hot-Carrier Damage in Reoxidized Nitrided Oxide MOSFETs.” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 38-40. |
H.S. Momose, et al. “Analysis of the Temperature Dependence of Hot-Carrier-Induced Degradation in Bipolar Transistors for Bi-CMOS.” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol, 41, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 978-987. |
M. Khater, et al., “SiGe HBT Technology with Fmax/Ft = 350/300 GHz and Gate Delay Below 3.3 ps”. 2004 IEEE, 4 pages. |
J.C. Bean, et al., “GEx SI 1-x/Si Strained-Layer Superlattice Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy”. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2(2), Apr.-Jun. 1984, pp. 436-440. |
J.H. Van Der Merwe, “Regular Articles”. Journal of Applied Physics, vol. '34, No. 1, Jan. 1963, pp. 117-122. |
J.W. Matthews, et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”. Journal of Crystal Growth 27 (1974), pp. 118-125. |
Subramanian S. Iyer, et al. “Heterojuction Bipolar Transistors Using Si—Ge Alloys”. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1989, pp. 2043-2064. |
R.H.M. Van De Leur, et al., “Critical Thickness for Pseudomorphic Growth of Si/Ge Alloys and Superlattices”. J. Appl. Phys. 64 (6), Sep. 15, 1988, pp. 3043-3050. |
D.C. Houghton, et al., “Equilibrium Critical Thickness for Si 1-x GEx Strained Layers on (100) Si”. Appl. Phys. Lett, 56 (5), Jan. 29, 1990, pp. 460-462. |
Q. Quyang et al., “Two-Dimensional Bandgap Engineering in a Novel Si/SiGe pMOSFET with Enhanced Device Performance and Scalability”, 2000, IEEE, pp. 151-154. |
Kern Rim, et al., “Transconductance Enhancement in Deep Submicron Strained-Si n-MOSFETs,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 26,8,1, IEEE, Sep. 1998. |
Kern Rim, et al., “Characteristics and Device Design of Sub-100 nm Strained Si N- and PMOSFETs,” 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, pp. 98-99. |
Gregory Scott, et al., “NMOS Drive Current Reduction Caused by Transistor Layout and Trench Isolation Induced Stress,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 34.4.1, IEEE, Sep. 1999. |
F. Ootsuka et al., “A Highly Dens, High-Performance 130nm node CMOS Technology for Large Scale System-on-a-Chip Application,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 23.5.1, IEEE, Apr. 2000. |
Shinya Ito, et al., “Mechanical Stress Effect of Etch-Stop Nitride and its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 10.7.1, IEEE, Apr. 2000. |
A. Shimizu, et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Control (LMC): A New Technique for CMOS-Performance Enhancement,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 2.2.1, IEEE, Feb. 2002. |
K. Ota, et al., “Novel Locally Strained Channel Technique for High Performance 55nm CMOS,” International Electron Devices Meeting, 2.2.1, IEEE, Feb. 2002. |
Quirk, Michael, et al.—“Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology”—ISBN 0-13-081520-9-2001, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA—pp. 456-466. |
Application No. 04 795 693.3-2203 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 23, 2010—Examination of Identified application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140322873 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11782429 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 13446609 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13446609 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14325540 | US | |
Parent | 10689506 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11782429 | US |