The present disclosure relates to field-effect semiconductor transistor structures capable of withstanding high voltages.
High-voltage, field-effect transistors (HVFETs) are well known in the semiconductor arts. Many HVFETs employ a device structure that includes an extended drain region that supports or blocks the applied high-voltage (e.g., several hundred volts) when the device is in the “off” state. HVFETs of this type are commonly used in power conversion applications such as AC/DC converters for offline power supplies, motor controls, and so on. These devices can be switched at high voltages and achieve a high blocking voltage in the off state while minimizing the resistance to current flow in the “on” state. The blocking or breakdown voltage is generally denoted as Vbd or BV for short. The acronym Rds refers to the product of the resistance and surface area in the extended drain region, and is generally used to describe the on-state performance of the device.
In prior art vertical HVFET structures, a mesa or pillar of semiconductor material forms the extended drain or drift region for current flow in the on-state. The silicon pillar structure is typically formed in the shape of a racetrack, with the pillar structure being repeated in a direction perpendicular to the pillar length.
The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
In the following description specific details are set forth, such as material types, dimensions, structural features, processing steps, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure herein. However, persons having ordinary skill in the relevant arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the embodiments described. It should also be understood that the elements in the figures are representational, and are not drawn to scale in the interest of clarity.
In the example of
In the example shown, both sides of pillar 10 are shown varying in the same linear manner (i.e., both sides tapered with the same slope) across the distance d1 of transition section. In one embodiment, distance d1 is approximately 3-10 μm long. Transition section 13 may be longer in other embodiments. In still other embodiments, transition section may be shorter or eliminated entirely; that is, instead of pillar 10 being tapered from the wider fillets to the narrower tip, fillets 11 may transition abruptly from width W1 at each end to width W2. It should also be understood that the shape of transition section 13 need not be symmetrical on each side of pillar 10. In other words, the transition from width W1 to width W2 may be implemented in different ways, utilizing a variety of layout shapes.
Continuing with the example of
Furthermore, although the example of
The performance advantage for a transistor device fabricated with a silicon pillar having wider fillets and a narrower tip is best understood by considering the graph shown in
Thus, it is appreciated that by optimizing the epitaxial doping in the silicon pillar, the drain BV is maximized at a narrower pillar width in the tip section of the pillar relative to the pillar width in the fillets. This contributes to an increase in the drain BV because the peak electric field in the thin silicon pillar is increased for a narrower pillar. An increase in the peak electric allows for a correspondingly higher carrier dose in the pillar. The doping concentration in the pillar may be increased even further since dose is equal to doping multiplied by the pillar width. Stated differently, by making the pillar width in the tip section narrower (as shown in
In the fillet sections of the device structure the pillar width may be increased to minimize the Rsp since the BV in the fillet sections is much higher than the BV in the tip. Persons of skill in the art will appreciate that in a practical embodiment the fillet section is much longer than the tip section, and that the fillet section dominates in determining the Rsp of the manufactured device. Also, the critical pillar width at which the BV falls off rapidly is higher for the fillet sections as compared to the tip section of the device. Practitioners in the art will appreciate that this allows for more process margin when increasing the fillet width.
The example layout of
It is appreciated that in certain embodiments, the inner field plate member may be eliminated. In still other embodiments, a plurality of racetrack shaped silicon pillars may be formed adjacent one another with merged segments such that the outer field plate member is formed as one large ring or rectilinear structure that laterally surrounds the entire merged pillar structure. In each of these alternative embodiments narrowing occurs in rounded tip or corner section of the silicon pillar relative to the wider fillet sections.
Furthermore, in other embodiments the width, d4, of the oxide dielectric need not be the same (i.e., constant) at all points around the tip section. That is, the lateral distance separating fillets 11 of pillar 10 and central portion 20 of inner field plate member 29a may be different than the distance separating rounded tip section 16 of pillar 10 and bulbous, rounded fingertip area 27 of inner field plate member 29a. Additionally, the rounded pillar tip section 16 need not have a semi-circular shape. For example, in certain embodiments the pillar tip can be a quarter-circle, leading the silicon pillar structure to have a somewhat more rectangular or even square shape.
In one embodiment, the doping concentration of the portion of epitaxial layer which comprises extended drain region 22 is linearly graded to produce an extended drain region that exhibits a substantially uniform electric-field distribution. Linear grading may stop at some point below the top surface of the epitaxial layer.
Extended drain region 22, body region 23, source regions 24a & 24b and P-type region 26 collectively comprise a mesa or pillar 10 (both terms are used synonymously in the present application) of silicon material in the example vertical transistor structure shown in
The height and width of pillar 10, as well as the spacing between adjacent vertical trenches may be determined by the breakdown voltage requirements of the device. For example, in a typical 500-700V HVFET, pillar 10 has a vertical height (thickness) in a range of about 40 μm to 60 μm thick. The lateral oxide thickness (width d4) is about 3-5 μm, and the epitaxial layer doping varies linearly from approximately 1-2 E15/cm3 at the top of extended drain region 22 to around 2-3 E16/cm3 at the bottom.
In another embodiment, instead of arranging P-type region 26 between N+ source regions 24a & 24b across the lateral width of pillar 10 (as shown in
Dielectric regions 25a & 25b may comprise silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, or other suitable dielectric materials. Dielectric regions 25 may be formed using a variety of well-known methods, including thermal growth and chemical vapor deposition. Disposed within inner dielectric layer 25a, and fully insulated from substrate 21 and pillar 10, is inner field plate member 29a. Outer field plate member 29b is shown disposed in outer dielectric layer 25b, similarly insulated from substrate 21 and pillar 10. The conductive material used to from field plates 29 may comprise a heavily doped polysilicon, a metal (or metal alloys), a silicide, or other suitable materials. In the completed device structure, field plates 29a & 29b normally function as capacitive plates that may be used to deplete the extended drain region of charge when the HVFET is in the off state (i.e., when the drain is raised to a high voltage potential).
The trench gate structure of vertical HVFET transistor 30 comprises gate members 28a & 28b, each respectively disposed in oxide regions 25a & 25b on opposite sides of pillar 10 between field plates 29a & 29b and body region 23. A high-quality, thin (e.g., ˜500 Å) gate oxide layer separates gate members 28 from the sidewalls of pillar 10 adjacent body region 23. Gate members 28 may comprise polysilicon, or some other suitable material. In one embodiment, each gate member 28 has a lateral width of approximately 1.5 μm and a depth of about 3.5 μm.
Practitioners in the art will appreciate that N+ source regions 24 and P-type body region 23 near the top of pillar 10 may each be formed using ordinary deposition, diffusion, and/or implantation processing techniques. After formation of the N+ source region 24, HVFET 30 may be completed by forming source, drain, gate, and field plate electrodes that electrically connect to the respective regions/materials of the device using conventional fabrication methods (not shown in the figures for clarity reasons).
In one embodiment, each of the racetrack transistor segments of the vertical transistor device structure has a width (i.e., pitch) in the x-direction of approximately 13 μm and a length in the y-direction in a range of about 400 μm to 1000 μm, with a pillar height of about 60 μm. In other words, the length to width ratio of the individual racetrack transistor segments comprising a vertical HVFET is in a range of about 30 to 80. In a specific embodiment, the length of each racetrack shaped segment is at least 20 times greater than its pitch or width.
Practitioners in the art will appreciate that in the completed device structure, patterned metal layers are used to interconnect each of the silicon pillars 10 of the individual transistor segments. That is, in a practical embodiment, all of the source regions, gate members, and field plates are respectively wired together to corresponding electrodes on the semiconductor die. In the example layouts shown, the width of dielectric regions separating the silicon pillars, as well as the width of the field plates, is substantially uniform across the semiconductor die. Laying out the transistor segments with uniform widths and separation distances prevents the formation of voids or holes following the processing steps used to conformably deposit the layers that comprise dielectric regions 25 and field plates 29.
Although the above embodiments have been described in conjunction with a specific device types, those of ordinary skill in the arts will appreciate that numerous modifications and alterations are well within the scope of the present invention. For instance, although HVFETs have been described, the methods, layouts and structures shown are equally applicable to other structures and device types, including Schottky, diode, IGBT and bipolar structures. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/134,504, filed Jun. 8, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,395,207, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/284,086, filed Sep. 18, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,964,912, entitled, “HIGH-VOLTAGE VERTICAL TRANSISTOR WITH A VARIED WIDTH SILICON PILLAR”, both of which are assigned to the assignee of the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5008794 | Leman | Apr 1991 | A |
5072268 | Rumennik | Dec 1991 | A |
5164891 | Keller | Nov 1992 | A |
5258636 | Rumennik et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274259 | Grabowski et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5285367 | Keller | Feb 1994 | A |
5313082 | Eklund | May 1994 | A |
5323044 | Rumennik et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5411901 | Grabowski et al. | May 1995 | A |
6084277 | Disney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6168983 | Rumennik et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6207994 | Rumennik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6424007 | Disney | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465291 | Disney | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468847 | Disney | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489190 | Disney | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501130 | Disney | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504209 | Disney | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509220 | Disney | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6552597 | Disney | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555873 | Disney et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555883 | Disney et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563171 | Disney | May 2003 | B2 |
6570219 | Rumennik et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573558 | Disney | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583663 | Disney | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6633065 | Rumennik et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635544 | Disney | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639277 | Rumennik et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667213 | Disney | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680646 | Disney | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6724041 | Rumennik et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730585 | Disney | May 2004 | B2 |
6734714 | Disney | May 2004 | B2 |
6750105 | Disney | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759289 | Disney | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768171 | Disney | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768172 | Rumennik et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6777749 | Rumennik et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781198 | Disney | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787437 | Rumennik et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6787847 | Disney et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798020 | Disney et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800903 | Rumennik et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815293 | Disney et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818490 | Disney | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825536 | Disney | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828631 | Rumennik et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838346 | Disney | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865093 | Disney | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882005 | Disney et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6987299 | Disney et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7115958 | Disney et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135748 | Balakrishnan | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7220629 | Balakrishnan | May 2007 | B2 |
7221011 | Banerjee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7253042 | Disney | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7253059 | Balakrishnan | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7335944 | Banerjee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7381618 | Disney | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391088 | Balakrishnan | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7459366 | Banerjee | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468536 | Parthasarathy | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7494875 | Disney | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7557406 | Parthasarathy | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7585719 | Balakrishnan | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595523 | Parthasarathy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648879 | Banerjee et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7732860 | Parthasarathy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745291 | Disney | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786533 | Disney | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791132 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7816731 | Parthasarathy | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7829944 | Disney | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859037 | Parthasarathy et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863172 | Tinggang | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871882 | Parthasarathy | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875962 | Balakrishnan | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7893754 | Kung | Feb 2011 | B1 |
20030136974 | Yedinak et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030209781 | Hattori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050145977 | Alessandria et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167749 | Disney | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050263852 | Tsuneo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070138547 | Nakamura | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070200183 | Rueb et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080197406 | Parthasarathy et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197418 | Parthasarathy et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1689001 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1959496 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2007105384 | Sep 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130187219 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13134504 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13793768 | US | |
Parent | 12284086 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13134504 | US |