Patent Grant
9611625
This invention relates to controlling the operation of an industrial machine, such as an electric rope or power shovel.
Industrial machines, such as rope shovels, draglines, excavators, etc., are used to execute digging operations at, for example, a mining location. The efficiency and productivity of a mine is related to the ability to operate each industrial machine at optimum performance levels to maximize output. Industrial machines include a combination of electrical, mechanical, and electromechanical components that are specifically designed for a particular industrial machine. The precise configuration of the machine parts or components, such as motors, transmissions, and gear sets, allow the industrial machine to achieve rated power, capacities, and warranty life. Over time, however, these parts or components must be replaced as they become worn or damaged.
To ensure that an industrial machine will be able to continue operating at full or maximum performance following the replacement of the parts, it is desirable to ensure that the replacement parts meet the specifications and quality of the original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) parts. For example, it is not uncommon for parts on an industrial machine to be replaced over time. Parts are replaced due to damage, age, normal wear and tear, etc. If an operator chooses to install non-OEM parts on the industrial machine, it is possible that those replacement parts will not meet the specifications and quality of the original OEM parts. If the replacement parts do not match the specifications and quality of the original parts, the industrial machine can be damaged or rendered inoperable if operated at rated levels. In such instances, it can be detrimental to the performance and reliability of the industrial machine to operate the industrial machine at maximum performance levels because the replacement part may not be able to withstand such performance levels without failing.
It would be beneficial, when operating an industrial machine, to ensure that the parts that are installed in the industrial machine meet the performance criteria set forth by the OEM. In this way, the operator of the industrial machine knows that the industrial machine can and will be operated at maximum performance levels. In order to ensure that the parts that are installed in the industrial machine meet OEM specifications, parts that are installed in the industrial machine can each include an identification tag, such as a radio-frequency identification (“RFID”) tag, that can be read to ensure that the part is a certified part. Each identification tag can, for example, emit a signal that is specific to that identification tag and a corresponding part or component (e.g., the signal can include information related to the identification of the part).
Each identification tag is operable to communicate directly with a controller of the industrial machine or through a modular network of intermediate component or devices (e.g., a tag reader, other components, etc.). For example, an RFID tag reader associated with the industrial machine can be used to receive a signal from each RFID tag. The received signals are used to compile a list of parts that are installed in the industrial machine. If the list of parts installed in the industrial machine does not match a predetermined parts list, the performance of the industrial machine can be limited or de-rated. For example, a hoist, crowd, or swing torque can be limited if the list of parts installed in the industrial machine does not match the predetermined list of parts. Additionally, if the parts installed in the industrial machine does match the predetermined list of parts, then the industrial machine can be allowed to operate at greater than maximum performance for certain operations or during certain portions of a digging cycle. For example, hoist torque can be increased early in a digging operation (e.g., increased to 120% of normal operational values).
In one embodiment, the invention provides an industrial machine that includes a plurality of components, an identification tag reader, an actuator, and a controller. The plurality of components is installed in the industrial machine and each of the plurality of components includes an identification tag. The identification tag reader is operable to receive a signal from each of the plurality of identification tags, and each signal received from the plurality of identification tags is specific to a respective one of the plurality of components. The actuator has at least one operating parameter. The controller includes a processor and a memory and is configured or operable to identify the plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine based on the signals from each of the plurality of identification tags, compare the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine to a predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine, and modify an operational setting of the at least one operating parameter when the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine does not match the predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of controlling the operation of an industrial machine. The method includes receiving a signal from each of a plurality of identification tags. Each signal received from the plurality of identification tags is specific to a respective one of a plurality of components. The method also includes identifying, using a processor, a plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine based on the signals from each of the plurality of identification tags, and comparing, using the processor, the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine to a predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine. The method also includes modifying, using the processor, an operational setting of at least one operating parameter of an actuator when the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine does not match the predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of controlling the operation of an industrial machine. The method includes receiving a signal from each of a plurality of identification tags. Each signal received from the plurality of identification tags is specific to a respective one of a plurality of components. The method also includes identifying, using a processor, a plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine based on the signals from each of the plurality of identification tags, and comparing, using the processor, the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine to a predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine. The method also includes modifying a setting of the at least one operating parameter when the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine match the predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine.
In another embodiment, the invention provides an industrial machine that includes a plurality of components, an identification tag reader, an actuator, and a controller. The plurality of components is installed in the industrial machine and each of the plurality of components includes an identification tag. The identification tag reader is operable to receive a signal from each of the plurality of identification tags, and each signal received from the plurality of identification tags is specific to a respective one of the plurality of components. The actuator has at least one operating parameter. The controller includes a processor and a memory and is configured or operable to identify the plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine based on the signals from each of the plurality of identification tags, compare the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine to a predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine, and modify a setting of the at least one operating parameter when the identified plurality of components that is installed in the industrial machine match the predetermined list of components that is expected to be installed in the industrial machine.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the configuration and arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein are meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “mounted,” “connected,” “supported,” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings.
In addition, it should be understood that embodiments of the invention may include hardware, software, and electronic components or modules that, for purposes of discussion, may be illustrated and described as if the majority of the components were implemented solely in hardware. However, one of ordinary skill in the art, and based on a reading of this detailed description, would recognize that, in at least one embodiment, the electronic based aspects of the invention may be implemented in software (e.g., stored on non-transitory computer-readable medium) executable by one or more processing units, such as a microprocessor and/or application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”). As such, it should be noted that a plurality of hardware and software based devices, as well as a plurality of different structural components may be utilized to implement the invention. For example, “servers” and “computing devices” described in the specification can include one or more processing units, one or more computer-readable medium modules, one or more input/output interfaces, and various connections (e.g., a system bus) connecting the components.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
The invention described herein relates to an industrial machine that includes a plurality of parts or components. In order to ensure that the industrial machine is able to operate at its maximum performance capability, the industrial machine must confirm that the parts or components installed in the industrial machine conform to minimum or acceptable performance standards. Performance standards of particular parts or components can be ensured when those parts are certified to meet minimum or acceptable standards of an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”). The industrial machine can ensure that installed parts or components meet minimum or acceptable performance standards by confirming that the parts installed in the industrial machine are certified parts or components. The presence of certified parts or components can be verified by receiving a signal from each component or part that identifies it as an OEM certified component or part. For example, each part or component can include a radio frequency identification (“RFID”) tag that provides identification information to the industrial machine. The industrial machine can compile the information received from the parts or components of the industrial machine and determine whether the parts or components installed in the industrial machine will allow the industrial machine to be operated at maximum performance capabilities.
Although the invention described herein can be applied to, performed by, or used in conjunction with a variety of industrial machines (e.g., a rope shovel, a dragline, AC machines, DC machines, excavators, etc.), embodiments of the invention described herein are described with respect to an electric rope or power shovel, such as the shovel 100 shown in
In some embodiments, the controller 200 includes a plurality of electrical and electronic components that provide power, operational control, and protection to the components and modules within the controller 200 and/or industrial machine 100. For example, the controller 200 includes, among other things, a processing unit 250 (e.g., a microprocessor, a microcontroller, or another suitable programmable device), a memory 255, input units 260, and output units 265. The processing unit 250 includes, among other things, a control unit 270, an arithmetic logic unit (“ALU”) 275, and a plurality of registers 280 (shown as a group of registers in
The memory 255 includes, for example, a program storage area and a data storage area. The program storage area and the data storage area can include combinations of different types of memory, such as read-only memory (“ROM”), random access memory (“RAM”) (e.g., dynamic RAM [“DRAM”], synchronous DRAM [“SDRAM”], etc.), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (“EEPROM”), flash memory, a hard disk, an SD card, or other suitable magnetic, optical, physical, or electronic memory devices or data structures. The processing unit 250 is connected to the memory 255 and executes software instructions that are capable of being stored in a RAM of the memory 255 (e.g., during execution), a ROM of the memory 255 (e.g., on a generally permanent basis), or another non-transitory computer readable medium such as another memory or a disc. Software included in the implementation of the industrial machine 100 can be stored in the memory 255 of the controller 200. The software includes, for example, firmware, one or more applications, program data, filters, rules, one or more program modules, and other executable instructions. The controller 200 is configured or operable to retrieve from memory and execute, among other things, instructions related to the control processes and methods described herein. In other constructions, the controller 200 includes additional, fewer, or different components.
The power supply module 235 supplies a nominal AC or DC voltage to the controller 200 or other components or modules of the industrial machine 100. The power supply module 235 is powered by, for example, a power source having nominal line voltages between 100V and 240V AC and frequencies of approximately 50-60 Hz. The power supply module 235 is also configured to supply lower voltages to operate circuits and components within the controller 200 or industrial machine 100. In other constructions, the controller 200 or other components and modules within the industrial machine 100 are powered by one or more batteries or battery packs, or another grid-independent power source (e.g., a generator, a solar panel, etc.).
The user interface module 210 is used to control or monitor the industrial machine 100. For example, the user interface module 210 is operably coupled to the controller 200 to control the position of the dipper 130, the position of the boom 145, the position of the dipper handle 125, etc. The user interface module 210 includes a combination of digital and analog input or output devices required to achieve a desired level of control and monitoring for the industrial machine 100. For example, the user interface module 210 includes a display (e.g., a primary display, a secondary display, etc.) and input devices such as touch-screen displays, a plurality of knobs, dials, switches, buttons, etc. The display is, for example, a liquid crystal display (“LCD”), a light-emitting diode (“LED”) display, an organic LED (“OLED”) display, an electroluminescent display (“ELD”), a surface-conduction electron-emitter display (“SED”), a field emission display (“FED”), a thin-film transistor (“TFT”) LCD, etc. The user interface module 210 can also be configured or operable to display conditions or data associated with the industrial machine 100 in real-time or substantially real-time. For example, the user interface module 210 is configured to display measured electrical characteristics of the industrial machine 100, the status of the industrial machine 100, the position of the dipper 130, the position of the dipper handle 125, etc. In some implementations, the user interface module 210 is controlled in conjunction with the one or more indicators 205 (e.g., LEDs, speakers, etc.) to provide visual and/or auditory indications of the status or conditions of the industrial machine 100.
The first hoist drive module 330, the second hoist drive module 335, the crowd drive module 340, and the swing drive module 345 are configured or operable to receive control signals from, for example, the primary controller 305 to control hoisting, crowding, and swinging operations of the industrial machine 100. The control signals are associated with drive signals for hoist, crowd, and swing actuators 215, 220, and 225 of the industrial machine 100. As the drive signals are applied to the actuators 215, 220, and 225, the outputs (e.g., electrical and mechanical outputs) of the actuators are monitored and fed back to the primary controller 305 (e.g., via the field modules 350-360). The outputs of the actuators include, for example, speed, torque, power, current, pressure, etc. Based on these and other signals associated with the industrial machine 100, the primary controller 305 is configured to determine or calculate one or more operational states or positions of the industrial machine 100 or its components. In some embodiments, the primary controller 305 determines a dipper position, a dipper handle angle or position, a hoist rope wrap angle, a hoist motor rotations per minute (“RPM”), a crowd motor RPM, a dipper speed, a dipper acceleration, etc.
The controller 200 and/or the control system 300 can be used to implement a component identification system.
For descriptive purposes, the identification tag 465 is described with respect to embodiments of the invention that include an RFID tag as the identification tag 465 (e.g., operating at a frequency in the range of 120 kHz-10 GHz). However, as previously described, any of a variety of communication devices, networks, and protocols can be used to communicate identification information from a component 460 to the component reader 245 or controller 200. The RFID tag 465 includes a memory 470 and an antenna 475. In some embodiments, the RFID tag 465 is a passive RFID tag that is powered by energy received from the component reader 245. In other embodiments, the RFID tag is an active RFID tag or a battery-assisted passive RFID tag that includes a battery, and either transmits signals periodically to the component reader 245 or in response to the component reader 245.
The RFID tag 465 can be affixed to each component 460 in a tamper resistance package such that removing the tag (e.g., to place on a different part) or tampering with the tag in any way will result in the tag becoming inoperative. The identification tags are configured in such a manner that an identification tag cannot be removed from one component and placed on another component without compromising the operability of the identification tag. In some embodiments, the identification tag for each component is embedded in a nameplate of the component. The identification tags are configured to withstand and remain operable in high temperature conditions, low temperature conditions, high vibration environments, etc. In some embodiments, identification tags are affixed to or associated with each component in the driveline, power, and propulsion systems of an industrial machine.
The identification system 400 is operable to actively detect the inventory of components within the identification system 400 and corresponding perishability data for the components. The controller 200 receives signals or information from the components or component reader 245 and generates a matching code or data for each component. The controller 200 uses the data to compile or populate a list of active or installed components that can be compared to a predetermined or stored list of components. The predetermined list prevents a non-OEM producer from modifying the inventory list with non-OEM tag data. In some embodiments, the communication between a controller 200 or component reader 245 and an identification tag is encrypted to prevent unauthorized manufacturing of identification tags. In some embodiments, the industrial machine 100 or controller 200 of the industrial machine 100 includes an executable application that performs encryption such that the encryption algorithm is not accessible. A decryption algorithm can also be included in the controller 200 to perform the matching of installed components to expected components such that the decryption algorithm is also not accessible.
The system 400 records the state of the industrial machine and reports the state of the industrial machine to an operator. In some embodiments, the controller 200 is operable to communicate with a remote monitoring center to receive current perishability (e.g., component degradation, rated life/performance expiration, etc.) data set validations and to report current machine conditions. The controller 200 of the industrial machine 100 is operable to communicate over a wired or wireless network with a monitoring system to receive updated perishability data for components, report current machine conditions, report equipment status, etc. The state of the industrial machine 100 can include incident reports, components not responding, components not present, components damaged, de-rating actions, and other diagnostic data that can be used to analyze maintenance planning and performance monitoring. If the controller 200 does not receive an identification signal or valid perishability data from one or more components of the industrial machine 100, the controller 200 can take a corrective action (e.g., de-rate performance). Perishability data can be updated based upon overhaul or repair specifications from a service center when a component is overhauled or replaced.
When the stored component list exactly matches the active list of components, and the devices all reported valid perishability data sets, the controller allows rated performance of the industrial machine 100 in accordance with rated machine specifications (e.g., 100% performance). When the stored component list exactly matches the active list of components, but the components do not all have valid perishability data sets, the controller 200 reduces performance or de-rates the operation of the industrial machine 100 (e.g., power, torque, etc.) based on which components do not have valid perishability data. Such an operation limits or prevents the application of power or force that could result in unintended motions, damage, machine wear, or other outcomes that are not in accordance with OEM rated machine specifications. When the stored component list does not exactly match the active list of components and/or the components do not all have valid perishability data sets, the controller 200 reduces performance or de-rates the power, torque, etc., based on the components that are missing or the components that do not have valid perishability data. As used herein, a “missing” component is a component that was expected to be installed on the industrial machine but did not provide identification information to the component reader 245. The component may be installed in the industrial machine 100, but the component is not a certified component or the component has been tampered with. In some embodiments, when the stored component list exactly matches the active list of components and the components all have valid perishability data sets, the controller 200 enables adaptive controls for the industrial machine 100. The adaptive controls can allow for parameters of the industrial machine 100 to be set to or operated at values greater than 100% of rated performance (e.g., power, torque, etc.). In some embodiments, hoist, crowd, and/or swing forces, torques, powers, etc., can be modified to values greater than normal operational values (e.g., between 100% and 150% of normal or rated operational values).
The controller 200 is operable to use the signals received from the component reader 245 to determine which components are installed in the industrial machine 100 (step 520). For example, each of the plurality of components provides an identification signal (e.g., a component serial number) to the component reader 245. The component reader 245 stores all of the received identification signals and provides all of the identification signals to the controller 200. The controller 200 analyzes or decodes the identification signals to identify the installed component. The controller 200 then compiles a list of all of the components installed in the industrial machine that provided valid identification information (step 525).
The compiled list of installed components is then evaluated (step 530) with respect to the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100. In some embodiments, the installed components and the expected components are compiled into a table. If a component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100 has no corresponding installed component in the table, a flag can be set by the controller to indicate which component or components are not present. In other embodiments, the controller 200 sequentially retrieves, from memory 255, information related to each component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100. The retrieved information can then be compared to each component in the compiled list of components. If a match between the retrieved information and the compiled list is identified, a flag is set to indicate that the component corresponding to the retrieved information is installed in the industrial machine 100. The controller 200 can then retrieve information related to the next component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine and perform similar comparisons. After all comparisons have been made and all flags have been set (e.g., indicating that each component is installed or not installed), the controller 200 determines whether the compiled list of components matches the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100 (step 535).
If, at step 535, the compiled list of components does not match the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100, the controller 200 is configured or operable to perform a performance de-rating or limiting operation (step 540). For example, the controller 200 is configured or operable to reduce the performance or de-rate an operating parameter or operational setting of power, torque, etc., of a swing motor, a hoist motor, and/or a crowd motor based on the components that are not installed in the industrial machine (e.g., based on the percentage of verified components that are installed in the industrial machine). In some embodiments, the performance of the industrial machine is de-rated or reduced to between 50% and 100% of rated performance values. Such an operation limits or prevents the application of power, force, or motion that could result in unintended motions, damage, machine wear, or other outcomes that are not in accordance with OEM rated machine specifications.
If, at step 535, the compiled list of components does match the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100, the controller 200 is configured or operable to allow or maintain the performance of the industrial machine (e.g., an operating parameter or operational setting) at maximum rated values (e.g., 100% hoist force, 100% crowd force, etc.). In some embodiments, if the compiled list of parts installed in the industrial machine does match the expected parts, then the industrial machine 100 can be allowed to operate at greater than maximum performance for certain operations or during certain portions of a digging cycle. For example, in some embodiments, hoist torque can be increased early in a digging operation (e.g., to 120% of normal operational values). In other embodiments, hoist, crowd, and/or swing forces, torques, powers, etc., can be modified to values greater than normal operational values (e.g., between 100% and 150% of normal or rated operational values).
The controller 200 is operable to use the signals received from the component reader 245 to determine which components are installed in the industrial machine 100 (step 620). For example, each of the plurality of components provides an identification signal (e.g., a component serial number) to the component reader 245. The component reader 245 stores all of the received identification signals and provides all of the identification signals to the controller 200. The controller 200 analyzes or decodes the identification signals to identify the installed component. The controller 200 then compiles a list of all of the components installed in the industrial machine that provided valid identification information (step 625).
The compiled list of installed components is then evaluated (step 630) with respect to the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100. In some embodiments, the installed components and the expected components are compiled into a table. If a component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100 has no corresponding installed component in the table, a flag can be set by the controller to indicate which component or components are not present. In other embodiments, the controller 200 sequentially retrieves, from memory 255, information related to each component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100. The retrieved information can then be compared to each component in the compiled list of components. If a match between the retrieved information and the compiled list is identified, a flag is set to indicate that the component corresponding to the retrieved information is installed in the industrial machine 100. The controller 200 can then retrieve information related to the next component that was expected to be installed in the industrial machine and perform similar comparisons. After all comparisons have been made and all flags have been set (e.g., indicating that each component is installed or not installed), the controller 200 determines whether the compiled list of components matches the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100 (step 635).
If, at step 635, the compiled list of components does not match the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100, the controller 200 evaluates the perishability data associated with the components that are installed on the industrial machine 100 (step 640), as described above. Based on the evaluation of the perishability data at step 640, the controller 200 is configured or operable to reduce the performance or de-rate an operating parameter or operational setting of power, torque, etc., of the hoist motor, swing motor, and/or crowd motor based on the components that are missing and the components that do not include valid perishability data (e.g., missing perishability data, out-of-date perishability data, component in need of repair or replacement, etc.) (step 645). For example, the controller 200 may reduce the performance of a crowd motor if a component is missing, and the controller 200 may reduce the performance of a hoist motor when a component is present but does not include valid perishability data. Such an operation limits or prevents the application of power, force, or motion that could result in unintended motions, damage, machine wear, or other outcomes that are not in accordance with OEM rated machine specifications. In some embodiments, performance is de-rated based on the percentage of verified components that are installed in the industrial machine and the percentage of components that include valid perishability data. In some embodiments, the performance of the industrial machine is de-rated or reduced to between 50% and 100% of rated performance values.
If, at step 635, the compiled list of components does match the components that were expected to be installed in the industrial machine 100, the controller 200 evaluates the perishability data associated with each of the components that is installed on the industrial machine 100 (step 650), as described above. If, at step 655, each of the components installed in the industrial machine 100 does not have valid perishability data sets (e.g., components degraded or expired rated life/performance), the controller 200 reduces performance or de-rates the operation of the industrial machine 100 (e.g., an operating parameter or operational setting of power, torque, etc.) based on which components are missing perishability data, as described above (step 645). Such an operation limits or prevents the application of power or motion that could result in unintended motions, damage, machine wear, or other outcomes that are not in accordance with OEM rated machine specifications. If, at step 655, each component includes valid perishability data, the controller 200 is configured or operable to allow or maintain the performance of the industrial machine (e.g., an operating parameter or operational setting) at maximum rated values (e.g., 100% hoist force, 100% crowd force, etc.) (step 660). In some embodiments, if the compiled list of parts installed in the industrial machine does match the expected parts and each part includes valid perishability data, then the controller 200 enables adaptive controls for the industrial machine 100. The adaptive controls can allow for parameters of the industrial machine 100 to be set to or operated at values greater than 100% of rated performance (e.g., power, torque, etc.). For example, in some embodiments, hoist torque can be increased early in a digging operation (e.g., to 120% of normal operational values). In other embodiments, hoist, crowd, and/or swing forces, torques, powers, etc., can be modified to values greater than normal operational values (e.g., between 100% and 150% of normal or rated operational values).
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, systems and methods for controlling the performance of an industrial machine based on the components that are installed in the industrial machine. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5144762 | Robinson | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5627749 | Waterman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5709043 | Jones et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5743031 | Launder et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743033 | Gegel | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5937550 | Emrich | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6030143 | Kreitzberg | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6229443 | Roesner | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6374990 | Swinderman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6415916 | Rini | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6469638 | Johnson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6578294 | Ollinger, IV | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6729052 | Ollinger, IV et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6735890 | Carpenter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6870485 | Lujan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6932891 | Wigg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6986216 | Emrich et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990390 | Groth et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993861 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7042346 | Paulsen | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7080470 | Jones | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7100315 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7139494 | Ono et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143007 | Long et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7165347 | Ollinger, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171771 | Briscoe | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174661 | Briscoe | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177553 | Ono | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7199718 | Kikuchi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7248154 | Menke | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257504 | Bolander et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7299570 | Emrich et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7367144 | Jones et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7406399 | Furem et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7408456 | Whitesmith et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7432812 | Ray | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7451558 | Jones | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7509834 | Bauchot et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7526886 | McClanahan et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536811 | McClanahan | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7579952 | Osterholt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7652579 | Keyaki et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7730651 | Carpenter | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7730652 | McClanahan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739814 | Carpenter et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7774959 | Kubo et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7827846 | Bauchot et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7832129 | Briscoe | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7855663 | Wilbrink et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7874086 | Briscoe et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882649 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7898403 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918514 | Dal Pra' | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7950578 | Majer | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7997017 | McClanahan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004397 | Forrest et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8024874 | McClanahan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8061064 | Ollinger, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8074383 | McClanahan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8104200 | Briscoe | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8122621 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8250785 | Kubo et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| RE43629 | Wu | Sep 2012 | E |
| 8308094 | Hoice et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8312650 | McClanahan et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8356432 | Carpenter | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8392764 | De Buen | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8411930 | Ridley et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8572870 | Kudo et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8578637 | Ollinger, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8763282 | Brufau Guinovart et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8806785 | Brufau Guinovart et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8872643 | Ebert | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8890672 | Miller | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9041533 | Villa | May 2015 | B1 |
| 9243381 | Behmlander et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9311513 | Miller | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 20020005297 | Alft et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20040227645 | Lujan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007239 | Woodard et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288937 | Verdiramo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060042734 | Turner et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226984 | Menke | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060261146 | Harada | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070108296 | Konopka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241908 | Coop | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290856 | Martin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000114 | Bentley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080001771 | Faoro et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080231458 | Fein | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284571 | Wilbrink et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090289582 | Armitage et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100045311 | Chung | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079288 | Collins et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142759 | Ridley et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164742 | Anderson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170119 | Lopez Almendros et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238002 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100275473 | Maher | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110162241 | Wangsness | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110200193 | Blitz et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110260834 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120098654 | Ebert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123611 | Grasso et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120260539 | Guimaraes et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130035875 | Hall et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130049935 | Miller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207783 | Cruzado et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130271274 | Ebert | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140039285 | Goodnow et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140173948 | Ok et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20150035673 | Miller | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150107075 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150149049 | Bewley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150284935 | Egger et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2010100656 | Jul 2010 | AU |
| 101832296 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| WO 2007128068 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2010096873 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2012017192 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012107848 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012116408 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO 2015126923 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action from the US Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/066,499 dated May 18, 2016 (21 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/052798 dated Nov. 16, 2012 (5 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/052798 dated Mar. 4, 2014 (5 pages). |
| First Examination Report from the Australian Patent Office for Application No. 2012302078 dated Nov. 21, 2014 (3 pages). |
| Second Examination Report from the Australian Patent Office for Application No. 2012302078 dated Mar. 20, 2015 (4 pages). |
| Examination Report from the Intellectual Property Office of Mexico for Application No. MX/a/2014/002453 dated May 3, 2015 (4 pages). |
| First Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 2012800426944 dated Jun. 1, 2015 (20 pages). |
| Final Office Action from the US Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/517,479 dated Aug. 20, 2015 (16 pages). |
| Second Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 2012800426944 dated Jan. 28, 2016 (20 pages). |
| Final Office Action from the US Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/517,479 dated Aug. 20, 2015. |
| Office Action from the Federal Service for Intellectual Property of Russia for Application No. 2014112222 dated Apr. 6, 2016 (8 pages). |
| Third Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 2012800426944 dated Aug. 2, 2016 (19 pages). |
| Office Action from the US Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/066,499 dated Sep. 28, 2016 (21 pages). |
| First Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 2016204742236 dated Sep. 18, 2016 (4 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160340866 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
