The present application relates generally to semiconductor fabrication processes and, more particularly, to semiconductor fabrication processes in which structural tiles are selectively incorporated into one or more layers of the device to improve process uniformity.
The characteristics of certain semiconductor fabrication processes are found to vary considerably from one device to another. For example, the rate and uniformity of chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) techniques employed in conjunction with shallow trench isolation (STI) processes varies considerably as a function of feature pattern density. As a result, the application of such trench CMP processes to substrates that contain active regions of different population densities can give rise to significant and undesirable non-uniformities in topography.
This problem is sometimes addressed through the incorporation of dummy features or “tiles” into less populated active regions of a semiconductor device so as to even out the pattern density between the two regions, thereby achieving greater process uniformity in the trench CMP process. Such dummy features or tiles are typically placed in the “white space” between active device features, and are thus independent of the circuit design of the semiconductor device.
The characteristics of epitaxial growth processes are also found to vary significantly with pattern density. For example, when epitaxial growth processes are used to form silicon germanium alloy films on CMOS substrates, the growth rate, quality, composition and thickness of the resulting films are all highly sensitive to pattern density.
Some attempts have been made in the art to compensate for the effect of pattern density on epitaxial growth. For example, in one known approach, a fraction of the dielectric tiles used to control topographical uniformity in the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) attendant to shallow trench isolation (STI) are reused for density matching in subsequent epitaxial growth processes. However, this approach is found to produce suboptimal results in terms of compensating for differences in pattern densities during epitaxy.
There is thus a need in the art for a process which overcomes the aforementioned infirmities. In particular, there is a need in the art for a tiling scheme which addresses the needs of both trench CMP and epitaxy. These and other needs may be addressed with the methodologies and devices described herein.
In one aspect, a method for making a semiconductor device is provided. In accordance with the method, a first mask is created for the epitaxial growth of features in a semiconductor device, the first mask defining a set of epitaxial tiles. A second mask is created for defining the active region of the semiconductor device, the second mask defining a set of dielectric tiles. The first and second masks are then used to create a semiconductor device.
In another aspect, a method of forming a microelectronic structure is provided. In accordance with the method, a structure is provided which comprises a first semiconductor layer and which has a plurality of active areas and a plurality of non-active areas thereon. A first mask is used to epitaxially grow a plurality of epitaxial features on the structure. A second mask is used to form source and drain recesses in at least one of the active areas, and to form dummy recesses in the non-active areas. A semiconductor material is then selectively deposited in the dummy recesses and in at least one of the source and drain recesses.
In a further aspect, a method for making a semiconductor device is provided. In accordance with the method, a semiconductor structure is provided which comprises (a) a first semiconductor layer having a first crystallographic orientation, (b) a second semiconductor layer having a second crystallographic orientation distinct from said first crystallographic orientation, and (c) an electrically insulating layer disposed between said first and second semiconductor layers. A first plurality of trenches is created which extend through said second semiconductor layer and said insulating layer and which expose a portion of said first semiconductor layer, thereby defining a plurality of epitaxial tiles. The exposed portions of the first semiconductor layer are then epitaxially grown. A second plurality of trenches is then created which extend through the second semiconductor layer, and the second plurality of trenches are filled with a first dielectric material.
In yet another aspect, a semiconductor device is provided herein which comprises a set of epitaxial tiles optimized for epitaxial growth, and a set of dielectric tiles optimized for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP).
It has now been found that the aforementioned needs may be met through the provision of a tiling strategy which incorporates (a) a first tiling scheme or pattern which is optimized for chemical mechanical planarization (CMP), such as the trench CMP attendant to shallow trench isolation (STI), and (b) a second tiling scheme or pattern which is optimized for epitaxial growth. The particulars of each scheme may depend on whether trench isolation occurs before or after epitaxy.
Unlike approaches in which a fraction of the dielectric tiles used for trench CMP are reused for density matching in epitaxy, the approach described herein permits the needs of trench CMP to be decoupled from those of epitaxial growth processes. For example, such an approach allows the epitaxial tiles to be oriented so as to favor certain desired growth rates and facets, thereby allowing silicon overburden and epitaxial CMP characteristics to be tailored independently of the needs imposed by trench CMP. Consequently, this approach allows both global and local pattern density effects to be adequately compensated for.
The methodology disclosed herein may be further appreciated with respect to
As shown in
As shown in
The trench 215 is then filled with epitaxial material 219 through epitaxial growth of the (110) substrate 203, as shown in
Referring now to
In the subsequent processing steps, the features formed by the epitaxial material 219 are used as dummy features or tiles in subsequent STI CMP processing to achieve process uniformity.
Referring now to
The trenches 227 are then filled with a suitable oxide 229, as shown in
It will be appreciated that various modifications may be made to the foregoing process without departing from the scope of the teachings herein. For example, the first 209 and second 221 hard masks may have various constructions and chemical compositions, and are not limited to the oxide/nitride masks depicted in the foregoing processes. In some embodiments, a suitable photo resist may be used in place of these hard masks. Moreover, the device may contain additional, or fewer, layers than those shown.
It will also be appreciated that the SOI silicon layer 207 may be replaced in the foregoing process with germanium (Ge) or with silicon germanium (SiGe) alloys. Moreover, while it is preferred that the SOI silicon layer 207 has a (100) crystal orientation and that the substrate 203 has a (110) crystal orientation, the methodologies disclosed herein are not limited to any particular crystal orientation of either of these layers.
As seen in
As seen in
In the particular embodiment depicted, the STI CMP tiles 311 are of various dimensions, and are placed in the inactive region of the device. The original outlines of the epitaxial tiles 307 (shown with dashed lines to distinguish them from the STI CMP tiles 311) are also depicted for comparison. Notably, some of the STI CMP tiles 311 overlap one or more epitaxial tiles 307, while other STI CMP tiles 311 do not overlap any epitaxial tiles 307. This thus underscores the design flexibility provided by the methodology described herein, namely, that the STI CMP tiles 311 may be optimized for STI CMP, and the epitaxial tiles 307 may be separately optimized for epitaxy. In a given implementation, the interaction between the two sets of tiles may be determined by design rule requirements.
In designing a tiling scheme for epitaxial growth on a (110) bulk surface, lateral overgrowth is observed to happen at a faster rate than vertical growth. Moreover, the rate of overgrowth varies with direction, such that growth is preferred along certain crystallographic orientations. This phenomenon is depicted in
One possible solution to this problem is illustrated in
The above description of the present invention is illustrative, and is not intended to be limiting. It will thus be appreciated that various additions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be construed in reference to the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4758531 | Beyer et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5278105 | Eden et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5994199 | Sugiyama | Nov 1999 | A |
6093631 | Jaso et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6323113 | Gabriel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6380588 | En et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6521969 | Tomita | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6593226 | Travis et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611045 | Travis et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614062 | Chheda et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6727567 | Bastek et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6764919 | Yu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6888250 | Mori et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905967 | Tian et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6948146 | Allen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7103863 | Riepe et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040256700 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023648 | Jung et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097490 | Travis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133832 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080166859 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |