In various embodiments, the present invention relates to thin-film structures and devices.
Both the alternative-energy and flat-panel display markets have a need for high-quality, flexible substrates on which to produce highly crystalline semiconductor thin films.
The current solar cell (i.e., photovoltaic) market relies on technology that has been essentially unchanged for decades. Over 90% of the market is served by crystalline silicon (Si), either single-crystal or polycrystalline, with average conversion efficiencies of 12-20%. The costs of crystalline Si devices are high due to high-cost production methods and high demand for the raw materials in competition with the semiconductor electronics industry. Si devices must also be quite thick to achieve these efficiencies, consuming significant quantities of material. The remaining 10% of the market is served largely by thin-film structures based on amorphous Si, CdTe, or copper-indium-gallium-selenide (“CIGS”) that are cheaper to produce but have energy conversion efficiencies below 10%. Amorphous Si efficiencies also degrade with time.
Higher conversion efficiencies, over 30%, have been demonstrated for thin film multi-junction devices based on III-V semiconductors such as GaAs. However, their production costs are very high since these devices are most advantageously grown on single-crystal germanium (Ge) or GaAs wafers costing over $10,000 per square meter.
Emerging low-cost photovoltaic technologies include ribbon-grown Si, polymeric/organic films, and nanotechnology-based approaches. None of these new solutions fully addresses the market needs for increased production volume, increased efficiency, and lower cost per watt generated.
A useful substrate for the growth of high efficiency semiconductor films (e.g., III-V semiconductor films) preferably enables the growth of low-defect films (similar to those formed on single-crystal wafers) but at much lower cost and with higher area. Flexibility is a useful attribute. The substrate is also preferably chemically compatible with both the semiconductor material and with the semiconductor process environment. These demanding attributes restrict the number of materials that may effectively be used for this application.
The ability to produce polycrystalline metals with crystallographic orientation (e.g., “biaxial texture”) approaching single-crystal quality in pure metals has been known since the 1940's. Practical applications of such texture control have included the production of aluminum sheet with textures that enhance the production of cans. Most commercial uses of sheet materials avoid texture, however, because the properties of sheet materials are more isotropic in its absence.
Face-centered cubic (fcc) metals, some body-centered cubic (bcc) metals, and some alloys based on fcc metals may be useful as substrate materials, as they may be biaxially textured using well-known rolling-deformation and annealing processes. A well-known texture in fcc metals and alloys is the “cube texture,” in which the c-axis of each of the substrate grains is substantially perpendicular to the substrate surface, and the a-axes align primarily along a length direction. Under controlled rolling and annealing processes, these deformation-textured metals may possess biaxial texture approaching that of single crystals.
Nickel (Ni) is one fcc metal that may be made into thin foils with a well-defined cube texture using a rolling and annealing process. Prior work has shown that oxide intermediate layers may be deposited on a biaxially textured Ni surface using conditions under which nickel oxide is not stable, but where the intermediate layer (for example, CeO2 or Y2O3) is stable, allowing the oxide to inherit the texture of the underlying Ni foil, i.e., form epitaxially thereon. The high-purity Ni required to achieve good biaxial texture is expensive and Ni is mechanically weak following the typical annealing heat treatment used to form the cube texture.
For these reasons, Ni alloys and other alloys have been developed to make stronger, non-magnetic biaxially textured foils. These alloys often contain alloying elements such as tungsten (W), molybdenum (Mo), vanadium (V), or chromium (Cr) in small controlled amounts. Relatively pure copper (Cu) may also be processed to produce a high-quality cube texture. Commercial grades of Cu with relatively low oxygen content and relatively low content of substitutional and interstitial elements have been of particular utility. In addition, prior work has shown that a wide range of Ni—Cu alloys may also be processed to produce high-quality cube textures.
Epitaxial films of other materials such as metals, oxides and nitrides can be grown on the biaxially textured foil. As used herein, “epitaxial” means that the crystallographic orientation of the deposited film is derived from and directly related to the crystallographic orientation of the underlying template.
Unfortunately, the existing deformation-textured foil approach is frequently not commercially viable for the deposition of semiconducting films necessary for high-performance optical and photovoltaic devices, e.g., Si, Ge, GaAs, InP, and related alloys and compounds. One promising approach utilizing Cu or Cu—Ni alloy textured foils is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0044832A1, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. However, such foils may be incompatible with conventional semiconductor processes. Both Cu and Ni form arsenide and silicide phases when exposed to As- or Si-containing gases at typical processing temperatures above approximately 350° C. The formation of these phases causes a significant increase in volume, embrittles the foils, and renders the foils largely unusable for subsequent processing and for most applications.
One potential solution to the above-described problem appears in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2009/0117679 and 2009/0114274. Therein, a buffer layer inert to semiconductor precursors “inherits” the texture of the metal foil after formation thereon. The metal foil is then removed before formation of one or more semiconductor layers upon the buffer layer. While this approach addresses the semiconductor process incompatibility issue, the grain size and crystalline orientation of the buffer layer and semiconductor layer(s) are constrained to match those of the original textured metal foil. For many devices and applications, different (e.g., larger) grain size and/or texture are preferred. For example, compound semiconductor films such as GaAs are preferably formed on non-polar substrates (e.g., Ge) having a crystalline orientation tilted away (“off-axis”) from a low-index crystallographic plane. When formed on such substrates, the compound semiconductor films advantageously contain no (or a few closely confined to the growth interface) anti-phase boundaries that may compromise the quality and efficiency of subsequently formed devices. In contrast, compound semiconductor films formed on non-polar substrates having a low-index crystallographic orientation (“on-axis”), e.g., (001) orientation, contain many deleterious anti-phase boundaries. Conventional methods utilizing cube-textured metal films are generally incapable of producing semiconductor films thereon having tilted crystallographic orientations; the cube texture represents a low-energy state for the growing films, and there is no driving force to form tilted orientations in such layers.
Thus, while considerable progress has been made in the use of biaxially textured foils in the production of inexpensive and/or flexible semiconductor thin films and devices, there is a need for processes and structures incorporating larger grain size and crystalline orientations different from the conventional cube texture.
The foregoing limitations of conventional semiconductor thin-film platforms and fabrication processes are herein addressed by annealing, preferably in a single step, a polycrystalline template layer at a temperature sufficient to cause abnormal grain growth therein (i.e., at a temperature higher than the layer's secondary recrystallization temperature). The abnormal grain growth results in a textured layer with very large grains, although the texture is generally not cube-textured. Rather, the grains of the annealed layer tend to have a crystallographic orientation that is tilted away from a low-index plane. Buffer layers and/or semiconductor layers formed thereon have grain sizes larger than those achievable with conventional methods. Furthermore, the formation process, thickness, and/or post-formation processing of such subsequently formed layers may be optimized to achieve particular crystalline orientations not obtainable with conventional methods.
In an aspect, embodiments of the invention feature a method for forming a semiconductor device. A crystalline template having an initial grain size is provided. The crystalline template is annealed, the annealed template having a final grain size larger than the initial grain size. A buffer layer is formed over the annealed template, and a substrate layer is formed over the buffer layer. The annealed template is removed to expose a surface of the buffer layer, and a semiconductor layer is formed over the exposed surface of the buffer layer.
Before annealing the crystalline template may have an initial crystallographic orientation, and after annealing the annealed template may have a final crystallographic orientation different from the initial crystallographic orientation. The annealed template may have a final crystallographic orientation tilted away from (001) by a tilt angle, e.g., a tilt angle ranging from approximately 15° to approximately 20°. The semiconductor layer may have a crystallographic orientation approximately equal to the final crystallographic orientation of the annealed template, and/or a crystallographic orientation tilted away from (001) by an angle ranging from approximately 2° to approximately 8°, e.g., approximately 6°. The grain size of the annealed template may be greater than approximately 1 cm, and even greater than approximately 10 cm. The grain size of the annealed template may be greater than approximately ten times the thickness of the annealed template.
A semiconductor device, which may include or consist essentially of at least one polar compound semiconductor material, may be formed on the semiconductor layer. The semiconductor layer may include or consist essentially of a non-polar semiconductor material, and the semiconductor device may be substantially free of anti-phase boundaries. The buffer layer may include or consist essentially of Cr, Pd, Ir, an oxide, and/or a nitride. The crystalline template may include or consist essentially of Cu, Ni, and/or a Cu—Ni alloy.
In another aspect, embodiments of the invention feature a method for forming a semiconductor device. A crystalline template having an initial grain size is provided. The crystalline template is annealed, the annealed template having a final grain size larger than the initial grain size. A buffer layer is formed over the annealed template, and a semiconductor layer is formed over the buffer layer. The crystalline template includes or consists essentially of a material substantially impervious to reaction with As-containing gases and/or Si-containing gases at a temperature greater than approximately 350° C.
The crystalline template may include or consist essentially of steel. Before annealing the crystalline template may have an initial crystallographic orientation, and after annealing the annealed template may have a final crystallographic orientation different from the initial crystallographic orientation. The annealed template may have a final crystallographic orientation tilted away from (001) by a tilt angle, e.g., a tilt angle ranging from approximately 15° to approximately 20°. The semiconductor layer may have a crystallographic orientation approximately equal to the final crystallographic orientation of the annealed template, and/or a crystallographic orientation tilted away from (001) by an angle ranging from approximately 2° to approximately 8°, e.g., approximately 6°. The grain size of the annealed template may be greater than approximately 1 cm, and even greater than approximately 10 cm. The grain size of the annealed template may be greater than approximately ten times the thickness of the annealed template.
A semiconductor device, which may include or consist essentially of at least one polar compound semiconductor material, may be formed on the semiconductor layer. The semiconductor layer may include or consist essentially of a non-polar semiconductor material, and the semiconductor device may be substantially free of anti-phase boundaries. The buffer layer may include or consist essentially of Cr, Pd, Ir, an oxide, and/or a nitride. The crystalline template may include or consist essentially of Cu, Ni, and/or a Cu—Ni alloy.
In yet another aspect, embodiments of the invention feature a semiconductor structure including or consisting essentially of a substantially amorphous substrate layer, a tilted buffer layer disposed over the substrate layer, and a semiconductor layer disposed over the tilted buffer layer. The tilted buffer layer and/or the semiconductor layer has a grain size greater than approximately 1 cm.
The crystallographic orientation of the tilted buffer layer and/or the semiconductor layer may be tilted away from (001) by a tilt angle, e.g., a tilt angle ranging from approximately 15° to approximately 20°, ranging from approximately 2° to approximately 8°, or of approximately 6°. A semiconductor device, which may include or consist essentially of at least one polar compound semiconductor material, may be formed on the semiconductor layer. The semiconductor layer may include or consist essentially of a non-polar semiconductor material, and the semiconductor device may be substantially free of anti-phase boundaries. The magnitude of the tilt away from a low-index crystallographic direction of the semiconductor layer may be less than the magnitude of tilt away from the low-index crystallographic direction of the tilted buffer layer.
In a further aspect, embodiments of the invention feature a semiconductor structure including or consisting essentially of a template layer, a tilted buffer layer disposed over the template layer, and a semiconductor layer disposed over the tilted buffer layer. The template layer includes or consists essentially of a material substantially impervious to reaction with As-containing gases and/or Si-containing gases at a temperature greater than approximately 350° C.
The template layer, the tilted buffer layer, and/or the semiconductor layer may have a grain size greater than approximately 1 cm. The template layer may include or consist essentially of steel. The crystallographic orientation of the template layer, the tilted buffer layer, and/or the semiconductor layer may be tilted away from (001) by a tilt angle, e.g., a tilt angle ranging from approximately 15° to approximately 20°, ranging from approximately 2° to approximately 8°, or of approximately 6°. A semiconductor device, which may include or consist essentially of at least one polar compound semiconductor material, may be formed on the semiconductor layer. The semiconductor layer may include or consist essentially of a non-polar semiconductor material, and the semiconductor device may be substantially free of anti-phase boundaries. The template layer may be substantially tilted. The grain size of the template layer may be greater than approximately ten times the thickness of the template layer. The magnitude of the tilt away from a low-index crystallographic direction of the semiconductor layer may be less than the magnitude of tilt away from the low-index crystallographic direction of the tilted buffer layer.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become more apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and may exist in various combinations and permutations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
Templates suitable for use in embodiments of the present invention include crystallographically oriented material layers that are chemically compatible and are lattice-matched with known and anticipated semiconductor materials, in particular with compound semiconductors (e.g., III-V or II-VI semiconductor materials). “Lattice-matched,” as used herein, refers to layers or materials having relative lattice spacings that allow the epitaxial growth of one layer (e.g., a buffer) on the other (e.g., a template) with a controlled crystallographic orientation and an acceptable level of defects to enable the subsequent integration of high-quality semiconductor materials and/or high-efficiency semiconductor devices. For metallic films, lattice-matching may be within an approximately 10% relative difference in lattice spacing, preferably within approximately 5%, and more preferably within approximately 2%. The lattice spacing may refer to the material's unit-cell lattice constant as it is commonly defined in the art, or to another interatomic spacing that can be defined in reference to the lattice constant. For instance, the lattice constant of a material may be lattice-matched to the lattice spacing defined by the diagonal of a face of a cubic crystal (which is approximately equal to 1.414 times the lattice constant). Furthermore, a material having a lattice constant (or other lattice spacing) that is approximately an integral multiple (again, within approximately 10%, approximately 5%, or approximately 2%) of that of another material may also be considered to be “lattice matched.” For example, a material having a lattice spacing approximately twice that of a second material will achieve approximate lattice registry with every other atom of the second material. The necessary degree of matching may depend on the type of material under consideration. For example, a high-quality semiconductor layer may require closer lattice-matching to an underlying layer than a metal layer deposited on another metal layer. Non-limiting examples of lattice-matching include Cr and palladium (Pd), which are matched to within approximately 8%, as well as the cube-face diagonal of Cr and one-half the cube-face diagonal of Ge, which are matched to within approximately 3%.
Many of the materials described herein are preferably inexpensive, flexible, mechanically strong and/or compatible with a semiconductor processing environment. Generally, compatibility with a semiconductor processing environment includes resistance to degradation resulting from exposure to elevated temperatures and/or chemicals within the processing environment, including, e.g., resistance to hydrogen, arsenic, or silicon absorption.
“Chemically compatible”, as used herein, refers to materials that do not react with or contaminate semiconductor layers to the extent that performance thereof is substantially affected. “Chemically compatible,” as used herein, means that a material is not reactive with a semiconductor process environment and preferably is not reactive with and does not react with (at least at the processing temperatures contemplated herein) or contaminate a semiconductor material integrated thereon. Further, even if a reaction does occur, a chemically compatible material should not react with a semiconductor to the extent that it degrades the quality or performance of the semiconductor. As one non-limiting example of chemical compatibility, Ge and Cr may react to form a GeCr compound, but this compound is stable and does not affect the performance of either the Ge or other semiconductors formed atop the Ge.
As used herein, “tilted” refers to a layer having multiple grains that are textured but not crystallographically aligned along a low-index crystallographic direction, e.g., (111) or (100). (Thus, the above-described cube-textured layers are not tilted, as the grains thereof are substantially aligned with a (100) direction.) Rather, the grains are aligned at a non-zero angle (i.e., “tilted”) with respect to a low-index crystallographic direction. Generally, grains in a tilted layer are tilted at approximately the same angle; however, the tilt may be toward one of several, e.g., two or even four, crystallographically equivalent directions. Thus, while the magnitude of a tilted layer is typically approximately equal in the grains of a tilted layer, the direction of the tilt may be different grain-to-grain. The magnitude of the tilt may be approximately constant throughout the thickness of the layer. In certain embodiments (further described below), the magnitude of the tilt may decrease as a function of thickness of the layer due to certain conditions, e.g., total layer thickness, growth rate of the layer, and/or the temperature of deposition. Herein, references to tilt and crystallographic orientation of polycrystalline layers are to at least one of the grains therein.
Referring to
Template 100 is annealed at a temperature and/or time sufficient to cause abnormal grain growth therein. For example, template 100 may be annealed at a temperature between approximately 900° C. and approximately 950° C. in vacuum for a time between approximately 15 minutes and approximately 60 minutes. After annealing, template 100 exhibits large grain size, i.e., has one or more crystalline grains at least an order of magnitude (or even two orders of magnitude or more) larger than the pre-anneal grain size. For example, annealed template 100 may have one or more elongated grains approximately 1-10 cm wide and approximately 5-30 cm long (or even longer). Generally, the average size of grains of annealed template 100 is larger than approximately five times the thickness of template 100, or even larger than approximately ten times the thickness of template 100. Thus, the grain size of annealed template 100 is larger than that of a “cube-textured” metal film, as such films have average grain sizes generally limited to only one to five times their thickness. The large grain(s) of template 100 are typically tilted. For example, the large grains of annealed template 100 may each have a crystallographic orientation tilted approximately 15°-20° from a (001) orientation. In some embodiments, annealed template 100 includes only a single grain, i.e., is substantially single-crystalline. Preferably, the anneal is performed at a single step, without deliberate heating at an intermediate temperature. The anneal is also preferably performed without a seed (sometimes utilized to “select” a particular grain) proximate template 100. After annealing, template 100 is generally still polycrystalline and may still have large-angle grain boundaries separating its large grains. In some embodiments, annealed template 100 includes both tilted grains and cube-textured grains; generally, any cube-textured grains are smaller in size than the tilted grains.
The quality of annealed template 100 measured by x-ray diffraction is superior to that of conventional cube-textured metal layers. For example, the out-of-plane (002) rocking curve full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of a cube-textured metal film may typically be approximately 4-5°. Layers subsequently formed on such cube-textured layers also tend to have FWHM values of no less than approximately 4-5°. In contrast, the FWHM of annealed template 100 formed as described above may be less than approximately 1°, e.g., may range from approximately 0.1° to approximately 0.2°.
Optionally, a sacrificial layer 110 is formed over annealed template 100. Sacrificial layer 110 may include or consist essentially of a metal or a metal alloy, e.g., Pd, platinum (Pt), aluminum (Al), or silver (Ag), or may include or consist essentially of an element or compound enabling improved lattice matching between template 100 and buffer layer 120 (described below), e.g., a material having a lattice spacing therebetween. Sacrificial layer 110 may be formed by deposition, e.g., evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, metallorganic deposition, or by electrochemical means such as electroplating (with or without electrodes). During formation, sacrificial layer 110 preferably inherits the crystallographic orientation (herein, the “crystallographic orientation” of a polycrystalline layer refers to the collective crystallographic orientations of the grains of the layer, each of which may be different from the others) and thus the tilt of annealed template 100. In some embodiments, the crystallographic orientation of sacrificial layer 110 initially replicates that of annealed template 100 but tilts back toward a low-index crystallographic orientation during formation; hence, the crystallographic orientation of sacrificial layer 110 may change in a tilt direction through at least a portion of its thickness. In such embodiments, the magnitude of the tilt at a top surface of sacrificial layer 110 may be less than the magnitude of the tilt at a top surface of annealed template 100. Further, the grain size of sacrificial layer 110 may be approximately equal to that of annealed template 100, e.g., greater than approximately 1 cm. Preferably, the grain size of sacrificial layer 110 is larger than that of unannealed template 100. In some embodiments, multiple sacrificial layers 110 may be formed over annealed template 100. Formation of sacrificial layer 110 may be performed without ion-beam assistance. During subsequent processing of annealed template 100, sacrificial layer 110 may substantially react with or diffuse into annealed template 100. Sacrificial layer 110 may have a thickness of, e.g., less than approximately 200 nm, e.g., less than approximately 100 nm, or even less than approximately 50 nm. In some embodiments, sacrificial layer(s) 110 have a thickness less than approximately 10 μm.
A buffer layer 120 is formed over annealed template 100 and optional sacrificial layer 110. Buffer layer 120 may include or consist essentially of a metal or a metal alloy, e.g., Cr and/or Ir, or may include or consist essentially of a nitride or an oxide. Such an oxide may be a compound consisting essentially of oxygen and at least one non-metallic element, e.g., Si. Buffer layer 120 may have a thickness of, e.g., between approximately 100 nm and approximately 500 nm, e.g., approximately 200 nm. In some embodiments, buffer layer 120 have a thickness less than approximately 10 μm. Buffer layer 120 may be formed by deposition, e.g., evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, metallorganic deposition, or by electrochemical means such as electroplating (with or without electrodes). During formation, buffer layer 120 may inherit the crystallographic orientation (and thus the tilt) of annealed template 100 and/or sacrificial layer 110. In some embodiments, the crystallographic orientation of buffer layer 120 initially replicates that of annealed template 100 and/or sacrificial layer 110 but tilts back toward a low-index crystallographic orientation during formation; hence, the crystallographic orientation of buffer layer 120 may change in a tilt direction through at least a portion of its thickness. In embodiments in which the crystallographic orientation of sacrificial layer 110 tilts back toward a low-index crystallographic orientation, the crystallographic orientation of buffer layer 120 may further tilt toward the same low-index crystallographic orientation, i.e., the magnitude of the tilt at a top surface of buffer layer 120 may be less than the magnitude of the tilt at a top surface of annealed template 100 and/or sacrificial layer 110. Further, the grain size of buffer layer 120 may be approximately equal to that of annealed template 100, e.g., greater than approximately 1 cm. Preferably, the grain size of buffer layer 120 is larger than that of unannealed template 100. Buffer layer 120 may be provided without ion-beam assistance. In some embodiments, multiple buffer layers 120 may be formed over textured template 100.
Buffer layer 120 and/or sacrificial layer 110 may have an out-of-plane (002) rocking curve FWHM (as described above in relation to template 100) of less than approximately 1°, e.g., it may range from approximately 0.1° to approximately 0.2°. In preferred embodiments, the FWHM of buffer layer 120 and/or sacrificial layer 110 is approximately equal to that of annealed template 100.
An optional diffusion barrier 130 is formed over buffer layer 120. Diffusion barrier 130 may be formed substantially non-epitaxially and thus be substantially lacking the crystallographic orientation of buffer layer 120 and annealed template 100; diffusion barrier 130 may even be amorphous in some embodiments. Diffusion barrier 130 may include or consist essentially of a metal or a metal alloy, e.g., W or rhenium (Re), or may include or consist essentially of a nitride or an oxide, e.g., a compound consisting essentially of oxygen and at least one non-metallic element such as Si. Diffusion barrier 130 prevents substantially all interdiffusion or reaction between substrate layer 140 and semiconductor materials and devices formed over buffer layer 120 (as further described below).
In addition to or instead of diffusion barrier 130, an insulator layer (not shown), e.g., a dielectric or other electrical insulator, may be formed over buffer layer 120. The insulator layer may be amorphous, and may include or consist essentially of an oxide, e.g., a compound consisting essentially of oxygen and at least one non-metallic element such as Si. In an embodiment, the insulator layer may include or consist essentially of a nitride or aluminum oxide. The insulator layer may be formed by deposition, e.g., evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, or molecular beam epitaxy, and may be formed without ion-beam assistance. The insulator layer may provide electrical insulation between substrate layer 140 and subsequently formed semiconductor materials and devices (as further described below).
A substrate layer 140 is formed over buffer layer 120 and optional diffusion barrier 130 (and/or the insulator layer, if present). Substrate layer 140 provides structural support to semiconductor materials and devices formed over buffer layer 120 after removal of annealed template 100 (as further described below), and is preferably chemically compatible with semiconductor materials such as Ge, Si, and III-V semiconductors at typical processing temperatures above approximately 350° C. In a preferred embodiment, substrate layer 140 includes or consists essentially of a material substantially impervious to reaction with As-containing gases and/or Si-containing gases at temperatures greater than approximately 350° C. Substrate layer 140 may be formed substantially non-epitaxially and thus be substantially lacking the crystallographic orientation of buffer layer 120 and annealed template 100; substrate layer 140 may even be amorphous in some embodiments. Therefore, substrate layer 140 may be formed by any method known in the art, e.g., vacuum deposition, chemical vapor deposition, heat lamination, electrodeposition, slurry coating, metallorganic deposition, or lamination. In the case of lamination, the laminating agent such as, for example, a braze alloy or adhesive, should also be chemically compatible and thermally stable with any subsequent semiconductor processes. In an embodiment, substrate layer 140 is formed by electron-beam evaporation at a temperature greater than approximately 900° C. Substrate layer 140 may include or consist essentially of a composite, a ceramic (e.g., alumina and/or zirconia), a glass, a metal alloy, or a metal, e.g., a Fe—Ni—Co alloy (e.g., KOVAR™), W, Mo, and/or Al. In an embodiment, substrate layer 140 includes or consists essentially of a metal coated with a thicker ceramic material for additional structural support. In various embodiments, substrate layer 140 is flexible and thus capable of being manipulated into non-planar configurations. Substrate layer 140 may be substantially electrically conductive, enabling it to function as a contact, e.g., a back contact, for a subsequently formed semiconductor device. Substrate layer 140 may have a thickness of, e.g., between approximately 1 μm and approximately 0.5 mm.
Referring to
Referring to
Semiconductor layer 200 preferably has a grain size larger than that achievable with conventional methods (and larger than that of unannealed template 100), e.g., greater than approximately 1 cm. In an embodiment, the grain size of semiconductor layer 200 is approximately equal to the grain size of annealed template 100 and/or buffer layer 120. Semiconductor layer 200 preferably is free of anti-phase boundaries.
In a preferred embodiment, coefficients of thermal expansion of semiconductor layer 200 (and/or subsequently formed semiconductor materials and devices) and substrate layer 140 are substantially matched, thus enabling the fabrication of semiconductor materials and devices substantially free of deleterious residual stresses and/or cracks. According to various embodiments of the invention, substantially matched coefficients of thermal expansion have a relative difference of less than approximately 20%, preferably less than approximately 10-15%, and even more preferably less than approximately 5%. For example, a coefficient of thermal expansion of Mo is approximately 4.8×10−6/° C., matched to within approximately 15% of that of Ge or GaAs (approximately 5.7×10−6/° C.).
Referring to
In an embodiment, semiconductor device 300 includes or consists essentially of one or more polar compound-semiconductor materials, and semiconductor layer 200 includes or consists essentially of a non-polar semiconductor material such as Si, SiGe, or Ge. The non-zero crystallographic tilt of semiconductor layer 200 enables the formation of semiconductor device 300 containing substantially no anti-phase boundaries.
Referring to
The layer and/or device fabrication processes described herein may be practiced in a conventional batch or single-wafer process or by a roll-to-roll continuous or stepwise manufacturing method. The resulting devices may have surface areas greater than approximately 115 cm2. Roll-to-roll processes may take place in a continuous system in which each step of the process is performed, or in a series of systems, each of which performing one or more of the steps in the process. A roll-to-roll process (or processes) may include or consist essentially of deposition of sacrificial layer 110, buffer layer 120, diffusion layer 130, and one or more semiconductor layers 200. A roll-to-roll process may also include the removal of template 100. Moreover, devices and materials utilized in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be substantially non-superconducting.
The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms and expressions of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof. In addition, having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of, and incorporates herein by reference in its entirety, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/147,879, which was filed on Jan. 28, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3372069 | Bailey et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
4128733 | Fraas et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4165558 | Armitage, Jr. et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4227942 | Hall | Oct 1980 | A |
4321099 | Frosch et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4332974 | Fraas | Jun 1982 | A |
4392297 | Little | Jul 1983 | A |
4400244 | Kroger et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4419178 | Rode | Dec 1983 | A |
4498183 | Levatter | Feb 1985 | A |
4514583 | Izu et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4530739 | Hanak et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4704624 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4707216 | Morkoc et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4774194 | Hokuyou et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4808462 | Yaba et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4981525 | Kiyama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5136351 | Inoue et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156995 | Fitzgerald, Jr. et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5231047 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5254481 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5279679 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282902 | Matsuyama | Feb 1994 | A |
5403771 | Nishida et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5433169 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5484664 | Kitahara et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5538903 | Aramoto et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5575862 | Nishida et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5603764 | Matsuda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5668050 | Iwasaki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677236 | Saitoh et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690736 | Tokunaga et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5739086 | Goyal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5824566 | Sano et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843811 | Singh et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853497 | Lillington et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5895938 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897331 | Sopori | Apr 1999 | A |
5913986 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6022832 | Fritzemeier et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027564 | Fritzemeier et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6063996 | Takada et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080928 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6106615 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6121541 | Arya | Sep 2000 | A |
6130380 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6166319 | Matsuyama et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180870 | Sano et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184456 | Matsuyama et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194023 | Mitsuhashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6277714 | Fonash et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288325 | Jansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331208 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340788 | King et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6362021 | Ford et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6413794 | Sano et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426320 | Fritzemeier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428635 | Fritzemeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432521 | Yagi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482668 | Okada et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6525264 | Ouchida et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6541695 | Mowles | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548751 | Sverdrup, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562702 | Yagi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562761 | Fritzemeier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6638838 | Eisenbeiser et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645313 | Goyal et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646293 | Emrick et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673646 | Droopad | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6730410 | Fritzemeier et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6750394 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756289 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765151 | Fritzemeier et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765240 | Tischler et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784139 | Sankar et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6797313 | Fritzemeier et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809066 | Reade et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815605 | Abe et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828507 | Fritzemeier et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6869863 | Nishida et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872988 | Goyal | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6893732 | Fritzemeier et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6962873 | Park | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6974501 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7038238 | Yamazaki et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7067856 | Ramdani et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7075002 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7087113 | Goyal | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115811 | Ho et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122733 | Narayanan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7183229 | Yamanaka et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7211521 | Mauk | May 2007 | B2 |
7256142 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279632 | Nakajima et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288332 | Findikoglu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7339109 | Stan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342276 | Ooms et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348259 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7601430 | Finkikoglu | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7666290 | Kruger et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7709360 | Van Gestel | May 2010 | B2 |
7745313 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8193076 | Moslehi et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8236603 | Fritzemeier et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
20020144838 | Fritzemeier et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030013280 | Yamanaka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019519 | Toyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027409 | Ramdani et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030127051 | Fritzemeier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148066 | Reade et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030188680 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207043 | Fritzemeier et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030221718 | Kubo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230338 | Menezes | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040245543 | Yoo | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256624 | Sung | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050074915 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060021565 | Zahler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033160 | Findikoglu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049399 | Lei et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073978 | Chason et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108688 | Richardson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115964 | Findikoglu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185582 | Atwater et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208257 | Branz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060255341 | Pinnington et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070044832 | Fritzemeier | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051302 | Gosain et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070163489 | Son et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181891 | Eisert et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197012 | Yang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215905 | Kohiro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235824 | Rakshit et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261733 | Hannour et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277873 | Cornfeld et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070277874 | Dawson-Elli et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023710 | Park et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050887 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080138927 | Headrick | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080217622 | Goyal | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230779 | Goyal | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080265255 | Goyal | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268622 | Van Gestel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090114274 | Fritzemeier | May 2009 | A1 |
20090117679 | Fritzemeier | May 2009 | A1 |
20100022074 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100102403 | Celik-Butler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100193795 | Fritzemeier et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100270653 | Leitz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110021006 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110027937 | Fritzemeier | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120100546 | Lowery et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120248455 | Van Gestel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1109230 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1469528 | Oct 2004 | EP |
WO-8505221 | Nov 1985 | WO |
WO-9009039 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO-9103583 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO-9722152 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO-9809337 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9848079 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-0016409 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0157932 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-02089188 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02091482 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03058725 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-2004033769 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004099472 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005096395 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005104236 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006111804 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007025062 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007117034 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007121619 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007134843 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008023265 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2010088366 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010088366 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/022381. Jun. 17, 2010, 18 pages. |
R. W. Cahn and P. Haasen: “Physical Metallurgy”, Jan. 1, 1996, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, XP002584210, ISBN: 0444898751, p. 2482, 3 pages. |
S. H. Huang et al, “Simultaneous interfavial misfit array formation and antiphase domain suppression on miscut silicon substrate,” Applied Physics Letters American Institute of Physics USA LNKD, vol. 92, No. 7, Aug. 18, 2008, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/081984, mailed Apr. 28, 2010 (8 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/081984, dated May 4, 2010 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Dec. 7, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/032008 (16 pages). |
Budal et al. “X-Ray Microdiffraction Study of Growth Modes and Crystallographic Tilts in Oxide Films on Metal Substrates,” Nature Materials, vol. 2, pp. 487-492 (Jul. 2003). |
Zhang et al., “Epitaxy of cubic boron nitride on (001)-oriented diamond,” 2 Nature Materials, pp. 312-315 (May 2003). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/033115, dated Feb. 26, 2008 (6 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/033115, mailed Oct. 2, 2007 (8 pages). |
Mauk et al., “Large-grain (>1-mm), recrystalized germanium films on alumina, fused silica, oxide-coated silicon substrate for II-V solar cell applications,” J. Crystal Growth 250, pp. 50-56 (2003). |
Ohmachi et al., “Zone-melting germanium film recrystalization with tungsten encapsulation,” Applied Physics Letters 43(1), pp. 971-973 (Nov. 1983). |
Wilt et al., “GaAs Photovoltaics on Polycrystalline Ge Substrates,” Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Conf. Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conf., vol. 2, pp. 1891-1894 (May 2006). |
Akazaki et al. “Single-crystal Growth of Nb Films onto Molecular Beam Epitaxy Grown (001)InAs”, American Institute of Physics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (16) pp. 2037-2039 (Oct. 1991). |
Goyal et al. “Low Cost, Single Crystal-like Substrates for Practical, high Efficiency Solar Cells”, The American Institute of Physics, First NREL Conference, pp. 377-394 (1997). |
Jones et al. “The Morphology and Microstructure of Thin-Film GaAs on Mo Substrates”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100193795 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61147879 | Jan 2009 | US |