The present invention relates to a lithographic apparatus and a device manufacturing method. In particular, the present invention relates to a cleaning device for an immersion lithographic apparatus and a method of cleaning the projection system and/or the substrate table of an immersion lithographic apparatus.
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the IC. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in the lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system and also increasing the depth of focus.) Other immersion liquids have been proposed, including water with solid particles (e.g. quartz) suspended therein.
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate using a liquid supply system (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in
Ideally, the projection system of a lithographic apparatus would never need to be cleaned, since this is a complicated and delicate task that may require lithographic apparatus downtime and dismantling of the lithographic apparatus. However, due to, for example, a liquid provided to a space between a final element of the projection system and a substrate in an immersion lithographic apparatus, the final element may become contaminated as a result of chemical reactions or drying stains. Additionally or alternatively, a substrate table of the lithographic apparatus may become contaminated, particularly the area outside where the substrate is held on the substrate table.
Cleaning the projection system and/or the substrate table may be done manually by a person wiping the projection system and/or substrate table with a soft tissue and using a mild solvent. As well as the downtime problem, this method may run the risk of scratching parts of the lithographic apparatus, such as the final element of the projection, and uneven cleaning that can create, for example, undesirable illumination dose variations over the projection field when the final element is cleaned.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous, for example, to provide a method for cleaning a final element of the projection system and/or a substrate table without having to dismantle the liquid supply system and/or which does not run the risk of scratching.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate, the projection system comprising a final optical element adjacent the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate table; and
a cleaning device configured to clean the final optical element, the substrate table, or both.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate, the projection system comprising a final optical element adjacent the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate table; and
a coater configured to coat the final optical element, the substrate table, or both.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided the use of a fluid supply system in a lithographic apparatus for the in-line application of (i) a cleaning fluid, (ii) a coating fluid, (iii) a coating remover, or (iv) any combination of (i)-(iii), to a space between a projection system and a substrate table of the lithographic apparatus.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a spray unit configured to spray a cleaning fluid onto a final optical element of a lithographic apparatus projection system.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided an ultrasonic emitter configured to turn a liquid confined in a space between a projection system and a substrate table of lithographic apparatus into an ultrasonic cleaning liquid.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning a projection system optical element, a substrate table, or both, in a lithographic apparatus configured to have a liquid in a space between the optical element and the substrate table, the method comprising circulating a cleaning fluid through the space.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of coating a projection system optical element, a substrate table, or both, in a lithographic apparatus configured to have a liquid in a space between the optical element and the substrate table, the method comprising circulating a coating fluid through the space.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
an illumination system (illuminator) IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g. UV radiation or DUV radiation).
a support structure (e.g. a mask table) MT constructed to support a patterning device (e.g. a mask) MA and connected to a first positioner PM configured to accurately position the patterning device in accordance with certain parameters;
a substrate table (e.g. a wafer table) WT constructed to hold a substrate (e.g. a resist-coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioner PW configured to accurately position the substrate in accordance with certain parameters; and
a projection system (e.g. a refractive projection lens system) PS configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MA onto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.
The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
The support structure supports, i.e. bears the weight of, the patterning device. It holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure.
Referring to
The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
The radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask MA), which is held on the support structure MT (e.g., mask table), and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes:
1. In step mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PS. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
A further immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system is shown in
Another immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system solution which has been proposed is to provide the liquid supply system with a liquid confinement structure which extends along at least a part of a boundary of the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate table. The liquid confinement structure is substantially stationary relative to the projection system in the XY plane though there may be some relative movement in the Z direction (in the direction of the optical axis). A seal is formed between the liquid confinement structure and the surface of the substrate. In an embodiment, the seal is a contactless seal such as a gas seal. Such a system with a gas seal is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/705,783, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
The liquid is confined in the reservoir by a gas seal 16 between the bottom of the liquid confinement structure 12 and the surface of the substrate W. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air, synthetic air, N2 or an inert gas, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between liquid confinement structure 12 and substrate and extracted via outlet 14. The overpressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level on the outlet 14 and geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwards that confines the liquid. It will be understood by the person skilled in the art that other types of seal could be used to contain the liquid such as simply an outlet to remove liquid and/or gas.
Referring to
In
The cleaning fluid 110 may be used to remove contaminants from both the final element of the projection system PL and/or the substrate table WT. Furthermore, the pressurized gas flow via outlet 14 and inlet 15 may also be used to clean the substrate table. Contaminants are washed away or broken down and removed when the cleaning fluid 110 is removed and replaced by immersion liquid 11, ready to expose the next substrate. The cleaning fluid 110, which may be supplied by the liquid confinement structure, itself may be a solvent, a detergent, a liquefied gas such as carbon dioxide, or a dissolved gas such as oxygen, ozone or nitrogen.
The liquid confinement structure may be used to contain cleaning gases as well as liquids. The gap between the projection system PL and the liquid confinement structure 12 may be temporarily closed during the cleaning action and even gases that are potentially harmful to humans or to other parts of the lithographic apparatus may be used.
This reduction in particle contamination by a different use of the liquid confinement structure may be beneficial for the processing quality of the lithographic apparatus. The cleaning action using the liquid confinement structure may be part of an exposure, or it may be part of a maintenance action when, for example, contamination levels require it. An advantage of this approach is that there is no need to dismantle the lithographic apparatus to clean.
Software may be used to guide movement of the substrate table further in every direction or desired direction than is required for mere exposure of the substrate. In this way, the entirety or a desired part of the substrate table WT may be cleaned because the entire or desired surface may, at some point, be beneath the liquid confinement structure.
Another cleaning device configured to supply cleaning fluid to the liquid confinement structure is, referring to
The cleaning fluid used will depend on the contaminant to be removed. Drying stains are usually salt deposits and depending on the exact salt, high or low pH solutions may be used. Other detergents may be used to remove metal deposits. For organic contaminants, organic solvents such as heptane, hexane (which are non polar), alcohol, e.g. ethanol, or acetone (which are polar) may be used.
Further, a projection beam may be projected through the final element PL during cleaning to break down certain organic contaminants.
In an embodiment, it is desired to avoid any mechanical contact with the final element to reduce the risk of scratching the final element. However, if it is needed, the liquid confinement structure 12 and/or the substrate table WT may contain a brush on a motor.
The cleaning station 20 may be positioned anywhere in or on the substrate table WT or in or on the liquid confinement structure 12 so that the liquid confinement structure itself, a closing plate and so on may also be cleaned. Many surfaces in an immersion lithographic apparatus are at risk of contamination because of drying stains, organics contaminants from the resist evaporating off the substrate, contaminations from the immersion liquid itself, and so on. Accordingly, the cleaning fluid 110, whether provided by the liquid confinement structure 12 or by the cleaning station 20, may be provided to all the same surfaces that may be exposed to immersion liquid.
Ultrasonic cleaning is particularly good for removing contaminants that have dried and hardened, for example, salts on the final element of the projection system PL. Ultrasonic cleaning is also useful for cleaning in areas that brushes or tissues cannot reach, such as the pimples in a pimple or burl-plate of the substrate table WT.
As well as or instead of a cleaning fluid 110, a coating may be introduced into the reservoir of the liquid confinement structure 12 via the liquid confinement structure 12 and/or via the cleaning station 20. In this case, the liquid confinement structure and/or the cleaning station may be referred to as a coater. The coating may be used to protect the liquid confinement structure, the final element, or other surfaces, or may be for other uses which would be clear to the person skilled in the art. A coating removal agent may be introduced into the liquid confinement structure in the same way.
Another cleaning device that may be used for cleaning microbiological contamination (i.e., bacterial cultures) is UV radiation. The radiation source of the lithographic apparatus may be used to supply this UV radiation, although another source could be used. For example, the radiation source of a lithographic apparatus may emit 193 nm radiation, a type of radiation which kills bacteria that may be present in the liquid confinement structure, on the substrate table, and/or on the final element.
There are at least two ways in which the UV radiation from the projection system PL itself may be used to kill bacteria on the substrate table. A first way is with a closing plate that is transparent to the UV radiation so that the closing plate holds the liquid within the liquid confinement structure 12 but the UV radiation may nonetheless reach the substrate table WT and kill the bacteria on it. A second way is not to use a closing disc, but to irradiate bacteria and simultaneously to wash the dead bacteria away with the flow of the liquid in the liquid confinement structure 12.
In the case where bacteria is to be removed from the final element of the projection system PL or a surface of the liquid confinement structure 12, the UV radiation may be provided by the projection system PL itself as described above, or it may be provided by a separate optical element. For example, an optical element positioned in the same place as the ultrasound emitter 30 in
Using UV radiation has an advantage of keeping microbiological contamination low while preventing prolonged downtime, which can be caused by having to perform wet chemical sanitizing using hydrogen peroxide or ozonated water, for instance. This treatment can be carried out as a preventative or curative measure.
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising: a substrate table configured to hold a substrate; a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate, the projection system comprising a final optical element adjacent the substrate; a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate table; and a cleaning device configured to clean the final optical element, the substrate table, or both.
In an embodiment, the cleaning device comprises a liquid confinement structure of the liquid supply system, the cleaning device configured to clean the final optical element in-line in the lithographic apparatus. In an embodiment, the cleaning device comprises an ultrasonic transmitter configured to turn liquid in the space into an ultrasonic cleaning liquid. In an embodiment, the cleaning device comprises an optical element configured to supply low wavelength ultraviolet radiation. In an embodiment, the liquid supply system comprises a surface that is transparent to the low wavelength ultraviolet radiation. In an embodiment, the low wavelength ultraviolet radiation has a wavelength of about 193 nm. In an embodiment, the cleaning device is configured to supply a cleaning fluid to the space. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises a solvent. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprise a detergent. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises a dissolved gas. In an embodiment, the gas is selected from oxygen, ozone or nitrogen. In an embodiment, the cleaning device is in the substrate table. In an embodiment, the cleaning device comprises a spray unit. In an embodiment, the spray unit is configured to spray a cleaning fluid onto the optical element, the substrate table, or both. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises ozone. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises plasma. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises liquid carbon dioxide. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises a non-polar organic solvent. In an embodiment, the cleaning fluid comprises a polar organic solvent. In an embodiment, the cleaning device is configured to clean only the final optical element or to clean only the substrate table.
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising: a substrate table configured to hold a substrate; a projection system configured to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate, the projection system comprising a final optical element adjacent the substrate; a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate table; and a coater configured to coat the final optical element, the substrate table, or both.
In an embodiment, the coater comprises a spray unit in the substrate table. In an embodiment, the coater comprises a liquid confinement structure of the liquid supply system, the coating device configured to coat the final optical element in-line in the lithographic apparatus. In an embodiment, the coating device is configured to coat only the final optical element or to clean only the substrate table.
In an embodiment, there is provided the use of a fluid supply system in a lithographic apparatus for the in-line application of (i) a cleaning fluid, (ii) a coating fluid, (iii) a coating remover, or (iv) any combination of (i)-(iii), to a space between a projection system and a substrate table of the lithographic apparatus.
In an embodiment, there is provided a spray unit configured to spray a cleaning fluid onto a final optical element of a lithographic apparatus projection system.
In an embodiment, there is provided an ultrasonic emitter configured to turn a liquid confined in a space between a projection system and a substrate table of lithographic apparatus into an ultrasonic cleaning liquid.
In an embodiment, there is provided a method of cleaning a projection system optical element, a substrate table, or both, in a lithographic apparatus configured to have a liquid in a space between the optical element and the substrate table, the method comprising circulating a cleaning fluid through the space.
In an embodiment, there is provided a method of coating a projection system optical element, a substrate table, or both, in a lithographic apparatus configured to have a liquid in a space between the optical element and the substrate table, the method comprising circulating a coating fluid through the space.
In European Patent Application No. 03257072.3, the idea of a twin or dual stage immersion lithography apparatus is disclosed. Such an apparatus is provided with two tables for supporting a substrate. Leveling measurements are carried out with a table at a first position, without immersion liquid, and exposure is carried out with a table at a second position, where immersion liquid is present. Alternatively, the apparatus has only one table.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive and reflective optical components.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
One or more embodiments of the present invention may be applied to any immersion lithography apparatus, such as those types mentioned above, and whether the immersion liquid is provided in the form of a bath or only on a localized surface area of the substrate. A liquid supply system is any mechanism that provides a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate and/or substrate table. It may comprise any combination of one or more structures, one or more liquid inlets, one or more gas inlets, one or more gas outlets, and/or one or more liquid outlets, the combination providing and confining the liquid to the space. In an embodiment, a surface of the space may be limited to a portion of the substrate and/or substrate table, a surface of the space may completely cover a surface of the substrate and/or substrate table, or the space may envelop the substrate and/or substrate table.
The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the claims set out below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/656,560, filed Jan. 23, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/015,767, filed Dec. 20, 2004, now allowed, the contents of each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4468120 | Tanimoto et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5257128 | Diller et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5587794 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301055 | Legrand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6459472 | De Jager et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466365 | Maier et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496257 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560032 | Hatano | May 2003 | B2 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633365 | Suenaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6781670 | Krautschik | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788477 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7029832 | Rolland et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050146 | Duineveld et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061575 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061578 | Levinson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7091502 | Gau et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7145641 | Kroon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7224427 | Chang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224434 | Tokita | May 2007 | B2 |
7307263 | Bakker et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315033 | Pawloski et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7358507 | Van Santen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362412 | Holmes et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385670 | Compen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385674 | Ishii | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388648 | Lof et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388649 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7405417 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7460207 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462850 | Banine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7522259 | Hazelton et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522263 | Van Mierlo et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7528929 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557900 | Shiraishi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7795603 | Lof et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7911582 | Hirukawa et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7929111 | Novak et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932999 | Hoogendam et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030030916 | Suenaga | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157538 | Krull et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021844 | Suenaga | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118184 | Violette | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135099 | Simon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | De Smit et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169834 | Richter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040169924 | Flagello et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180294 | Baba-Ali et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180299 | Rolland et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224265 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224525 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227923 | Flagello et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239954 | Bischoff | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253547 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253548 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257544 | Vogel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259008 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259040 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263808 | Sewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030506 | Schuster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036121 | Hoogendam et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036183 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036184 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036213 | Mann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037269 | Levinson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042554 | Dierichs et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048223 | Pawloski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068639 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073670 | Carroll | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084794 | Meagley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094125 | Arai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100745 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117224 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122497 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122505 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134815 | Van Santen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140948 | Tokita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141098 | Schuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145803 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146693 | Ohsaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146695 | Kawakami | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147920 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151942 | Kawashima | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153424 | Coon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050158673 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164502 | Deng et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174549 | Duineveld et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175776 | Streefkerk et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175940 | Dierichs | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185269 | Epple et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190435 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050190455 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200815 | Akamatsu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205108 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213061 | Hakey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213065 | Kitaoka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213066 | Sumiyoshi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213072 | Schenker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217135 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217137 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219481 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219482 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219489 | Nei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219499 | Maria Zaal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225737 | Weissenrieder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231694 | Kolesnychenko et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233081 | Tokita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237501 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243292 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245005 | Benson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253090 | Gau et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259232 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259233 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264774 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050264778 | Lof et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270505 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274898 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023185 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028628 | Lin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050351 | Higashiki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103813 | Niwa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103818 | Holmes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110689 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126043 | Mizutani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132731 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060209278 | Kiuchi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232757 | Tani et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250588 | Brandl | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256316 | Tanno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002296 | Chang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026345 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070064215 | Dirksen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076197 | Koga | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085989 | Nagahashi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091287 | Chang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070127001 | Van Der Hoeven | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146657 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146658 | Van Mierlo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159610 | Shiraishi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171390 | Hazelton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172234 | Shigemori et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206279 | Brueck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229789 | Kawamura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247600 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247601 | Hazelton et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251543 | Singh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253710 | Kaneyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258072 | Nagasaka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274711 | Kaneyama et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285631 | Stavenga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049201 | Stavenga et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080218712 | Compen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273181 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284990 | De Jong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025753 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027635 | De Jong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027636 | Leenders et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090086175 | Streefkerk et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091716 | Kadijk et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090174870 | De Jong et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174871 | De Jong et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190105 | De Jong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195761 | De Graaf et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
CN 1963673 | May 2007 | CN |
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 486 827 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
A 57-153433 | Sep 1982 | JP |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
A-59-19912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A-5-62877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
4-6104167 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
6-168866 | Jun 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
A-8-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-162831 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-283903 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-147204 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-319038 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-323396 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2004-40107 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-165666 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-289126 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-289127 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-289128 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-5713 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-072404 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-079222 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-510146 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-134999 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-148093 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-165502 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-520104 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-523031 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006-310706 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-029973 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-088328 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-142217 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-150102 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-227543 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-227580 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 02091078 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004077154 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081666 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004102646 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105107 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005001432 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003864 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005006026 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005008339 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013008 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005015283 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005017625 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005019935 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022266 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024325 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005050324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054953 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054955 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059617 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059618 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059645 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059654 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062128 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064400 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064405 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069055 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069078 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069081 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005071491 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074606 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076084 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081030 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081067 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005122218 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006041086 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006062065 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006122578 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007006447 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007136089 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007135990 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008001871 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161707. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161719. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161741. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161756. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 1, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-260597. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161707. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161719. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161741. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-161756. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando Jan. 2001, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003. |
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
B.W. Smith et al, “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfeb., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
Information Disclosure Statement filed Feb. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/703,802. |
Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/703,802. |
Emerging Lithographic Technologies VI, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4688 (2002), “Semiconductor Foundry, Lithography, and Partners”, B.J. Lin, pp. 11-24. |
Optical Microlithography XV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691 (2002), “Resolution Enhancement of 157 nm Lithography by Liquid Immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 459-465. |
J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 1 No. 3, Oct. 2002, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, “Resolution enhancement of 157 nm lithography by liquid immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 1-4. |
Optical Microlithography XVI, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5040.(2003), “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Soichi OWA et al., pp. 724-733. |
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-364310 dated Mar. 24, 2009. |
English translation of PCT/JP2004/007417 dated Nov. 27, 2007. |
Non-final Office Action as issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,425, dated Jan. 30, 2008. |
Final Office Action as issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,425, dated Oct. 31, 2008. |
Non-final Office Action as issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,425, dated Jul. 15, 2009. |
English translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-364310, dated Dec. 2, 2008. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-364310. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110109887 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11656560 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12986576 | US | |
Parent | 11015767 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11656560 | US |