The present invention relates to immersion lithography.
The term “patterning device” as here employed should be broadly interpreted as referring to means that can be used to endow an incoming radiation beam with a patterned cross-section, corresponding to a pattern that is to be created in a target portion of the substrate; the term “light valve” can also be used in this context. Generally, the said pattern will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit or other device (see below). Examples of such a patterning device include:
For purposes of simplicity, the rest of this text may, at certain locations, specifically direct itself to examples involving a mask and mask table; however, the general principles discussed in such instances should be seen in the broader context of the patterning device as hereabove set forth.
Lithographic projection apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In such a case, the patterning device may generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g. comprising one or more dies) on a substrate (silicon wafer. LCD, mask etc) that has been coated with a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single wafer will contain a whole network of adjacent target portions that are successively irradiated via the projection system, one at a time. In current apparatus, employing patterning by a mask on a mask table, a distinction can be made between two different types of machine. In one type of lithographic projection apparatus, each target portion is irradiated by exposing the entire mask pattern onto the target portion at one time; such an apparatus is commonly referred to as a wafer stepper. In an alternative apparatus -commonly referred to as a step-and-scan apparatus—each target portion is irradiated by progressively scanning the mask pattern under the projection beam in a given reference direction (the “scanning” direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate table parallel or anti-parallel to this direction; since, in general, the projection system will have a magnification factor M (generally <1), the speed V at which the substrate table is scanned will be a factor M times that at which the mask table is scanned. More information with regard to lithographic devices as here described can be gleaned, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,792, incorporated herein by reference.
In a manufacturing process using a lithographic projection apparatus, a pattern (e.g. in a mask) is imaged onto a substrate that is at least partially covered by a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). Prior to this imaging step, the substrate may undergo various procedures, such as priming, resist coating and a soft bake. After exposure, the substrate may be subjected to other procedures, such as a post-exposure bake (PEB), development, a hard bake and measurement/inspection of the imaged features. This array of procedures is used as a basis to pattern an individual layer of a device, e.g. an IC. Such a patterned layer may then undergo various processes such as etching, ion-implantation (doping), metallization, oxidation, chemo-mechanical polishing, etc., all intended to finish off an individual layer. If several layers are required, then the whole procedure, or a variant thereof, will have to be repeated for each new layer. Eventually, an array of devices will be present on the substrate (wafer). These devices are then separated from one another by a technique such as dicing or sawing, whence the individual devices can be mounted on a carrier, connected to pins, etc. Further information regarding such processes can be obtained, for example, from the book “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semiconductor Processing”, Third Edition, by Peter van Zant, McGraw Hill Publishing Co., 1997, ISBN 0-07-067250-4, incorporated herein by reference.
For the sake of simplicity, the projection system may hereinafter be referred to as the “lens”; however, this term should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection system, including refractive optics, reflective optics, and catadioptric systems, for example. The radiation system may also include components operating according to any of these design types for directing, shaping or controlling the projection beam of radiation, and such components may also be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens”. Further, the lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” devices the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposures. Dual stage lithographic apparatus are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,441 and WO 98/40791, incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The lithographic industry is constantly trying to reduce feature sizes on silicon substrates in order to manufacture ever more complex integrated circuits. The feature sizes are limited by the effect of diffraction and thus the resolution of a particular system of numeral aperture NA using a wavelength λ is:
where k is a pre-factor. The numerical aperture NA is n sin θ where n is the refractive index of the transmissive substance.
Hence to decrease the resolution, the wavelength can either be reduced or the numerical aperture increased. It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system).
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) may mean that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This may require additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid in a localized area between the final element of the projection system and the substrate (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection systems). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in
Immersion lithography is an embryonic technology and there remain many problems in its practical application. This patent application is concerned in particular with alignment and leveling of a substrate. Conventionally alignment and leveling is performed with the substrate in the field of view of the projection system (i.e. at an exposure station). However there is not a lot of space for alignment or level measurement apparatus in and around an immersion liquid reservoir so the adaptation is likely to be complex or the accuracy can be compromised. Furthermore, the presence of liquid near the alignment and level measurement apparatus can degrade the performance of the apparatus.
Accordingly, it may be advantageous to provide, for example, a method and apparatus for accurately aligning and/or leveling a substrate in an immersion lithography apparatus.
According to an aspect, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:
a support structure configured to hold a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern a beam of radiation according to a desired pattern;
a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
a projection system configured to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid, through which said beam is to be projected, in a space between said projection system and said substrate; and
a measurement system configured to measure, not through said liquid, locations of points on said substrate.
The position of points on the substrate are thus measured without the presence of liquid and, in an embodiment, outside the immersion system. Alternatively, the measurements could take place while a target portion of the substrate is submerged in liquid, i.e. the measurements take place through liquid, but not the same liquid as supplied by the liquid supply system to fill a space between the projection system and the substrate. The position of points on the substrate would therefore be measured with liquid between the measurement system and the substrate, the liquid would then be removed before moving the substrate (and substrate table) to the focal point of the projection system where the liquid supply system would supply liquid to fill a space between the projection system and the substrate prior to exposure taking place. A second liquid supply system may be present in the vicinity of the measurement system.
A possible advantage is that there is better flow in the liquid reservoir because the measurement system is no longer in or around the reservoir crowding the projection system and the performance of the measurement system is not degraded by the presence of liquid. Furthermore smooth flow conditions in the liquid reservoir are desired as there is no change in the apparatus leading to rough edges. Using this method, measurement systems not specifically adapted for immersion lithography can be used without complex adaptation. A further advantage of this measurement system is that any improvements to such measurement systems used outside of the immersion lithography field can easily and automatically be incorporated into the immersion system.
The measurement system, in an embodiment, comprises an alignment system configured to measure the location (in the x, y and Rz directions) of a plurality of alignment marks on said substrate. According to an embodiment, said substrate table has a reference and said measurement system measures the location of said reference not through said liquid of said supply system. The location of the alignment marks may in an embodiment be measured relative to said reference on said substrate table to enable a map of alignment marks relative to the reference to be built up.
According to an embodiment, the measurement system comprises a level sensor configured to measure the height and/or tilt (i.e. measuring in the z, Rx and Ry directions) of points on said substrate. Thus, level measurement of the substrate, which is conventionally undertaken “on-the-fly” at the exposure station, can be achieved outside the liquid reservoir.
In an embodiment, the lithographic projection apparatus can have an exposure station at which said substrate may be exposed and a separate measurement station, said measurement system being provided at said measurement station and said substrate table being movable between said exposure and measurement stations. Furthermore, there can be a plurality of substrate tables, each movable between an exposure station and a measurement station. While one substrate table is being mapped, a second substrate table can be exposed. Substrate throughput may therefore be increased, making the apparatus more efficient and improving the cost of ownership.
According to an embodiment, said reference is a transmission image sensor.
In an embodiment, the alignment system measures displacement in two linear perpendicular directions and rotation within the plane defined by the two perpendicular directions.
In an embodiment, said liquid supply system is configured to provide said liquid to a space between a final lens of said projection system and said substrate.
According to a further aspect, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising:
providing a liquid in a space between a projection system and a substrate;
measuring the locations of points on a substrate using a measurement beam projected from a measurement system but not projected through said liquid; and
projecting a patterned beam of radiation, through said liquid, onto a target portion of the substrate using the projection system.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of the apparatus described herein in the manufacture of ICs, it should be explicitly understood that such an apparatus has many other possible applications. For example, it may be employed in the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal display panels, thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “reticle”, “wafer” or “die” in this text should be considered as being replaced by the more general terms “mask”, “substrate” and “target portion”, respectively.
In the present document, the terms “radiation” and “beam” are used to encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet radiation (e.g. with a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which:
In the Figures, corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. has a transmissive mask). However, in general, it may also be of a reflective type, for example (e.g. with a reflective mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may employ another kind of patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
The source LA (e.g. a laser-produced or discharge plasma source) produces a beam of radiation. This beam is fed into an illumination system (illuminator) IL, either directly or after having traversed conditioning means, such as a beam expander Ex, for example. The illuminator IL may comprise adjusting means AM for setting the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in the beam. In addition, it will generally comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. In this way, the beam PB impinging on the mask MA has a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
It should be noted with regard to
The beam PB subsequently intercepts the mask MA, which is held on a mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam PB onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning means (and interferometric measuring means IF), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning means can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the beam PB, e.g. after mechanical retrieval of the mask MA from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the object tables MT, WT will be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (course positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which are not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus can be used in two different modes:
1. In step mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary, and an entire mask image is projected at one time (i.e. a single “flash”) onto a target portion C. The substrate table WT is then shifted in the x and/or y directions so that a different target portion C can be irradiated by the beam PB;
2. In scan mode, essentially the same scenario applies, except that a given target portion C is not exposed in a single “flash”. Instead, the mask table MT is movable in a given direction (the so-called “scan direction”, e.g. the y direction) with a speed v, so that the projection beam PB is caused to scan over a mask image; concurrently, the substrate table WT is simultaneously moved in the same or opposite direction at a speed V=Mv, in which M is the magnification of the projection system PL (typically, M=1/4 or 1/5). In this manner, a relatively large target portion C can be exposed, without having to compromise on resolution.
In
Level measurement of the substrate then occurs at the measurement station. In order to measure the level of the substrate, a leveling beam (projected from the measurement system 30) can be used that traverses a first grating prior to reflection by the substrate W. A second grating is then placed in the path of the leveling beam after reflection by the substrate W. The extent to which the images of the first and second gratings coincide is measured by a level measurement sensor and is determined by the height and/or tilts of the substrate W (the z, Rx and Ry coordinates are thus determined). For a further description of level measurement of substrates reference is made to European patent application EP 0502583. Hence, using data from the alignment of the substrate and the level measurement of the substrate, a map of the substrate can be generated.
As shown in
A gas seal 16, formed between the bottom of the seal member 12 and the surface of the substrate W, confines the liquid in the reservoir. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air or synthetic air but in an embodiment, N2 or another inert gas, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between seal member 12 and the substrate W and extracted via first outlet 14. An overpressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level on the first outlet 14 and geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwards that confines the liquid.
In an embodiment, the liquid reservoir defined by inlet(s) IN and outlet(s) OUT as shown in
To ascertain the exact position of the substrate table WT at the exposure station the reference F1 is scanned in three dimensions through the aerial image of an alignment mark on the mask MA. The maximum signal is returned when the reference is aligned with the image of the mark on the mask in the plane of best focus. Using the map of the substrate W generated at the measurement station, the location, height and/or tilt of positions on the substrate W are therefore known. In order to track the movements of the substrate table WT, suitable position measurements devices can be used such as an interferometer beam projected towards one or more sides of the substrate table WT. A particular point on the substrate table can be placed at the focal point of the projection system PL and exposure of a target portion C of the substrate W can take place.
Once exposure of the substrate W is completed it is then removed for further processing and a new substrate placed on substrate table WT. The substrate table with the new substrate returns to the measurement station and the process can be repeated.
Prior to the substrate table WT leaving the exposure station, the liquid reservoir can be emptied, for example in the case shown in
To ascertain the exact position of the substrate table WT, the position of the transmission image sensor described above can be sensed through the liquid, or alternatively not through the liquid and a correction applied.
According to an embodiment, there are at least two substrate tables, each bearing a reference, and while one substrate table is at the measurement station the other is at the exposure station. The substrate tables are movable between an exposure station and a measurement station.
Instead of using the reference mark F1 and the projection system to align the substrate, off-axis measurement can be used. The reference mark F1 can be aligned using another system near the projection system PL. Alternatively, a different reference and a different system, for example one with an axis perpendicular to the projection axis of the projection system can be used. Further description of such off-axis measurement can be found in European patent application publication EP 0906590.
Alternatively, if the substrate table is above the projection system (i.e. the projection system is upside down compared to
In an alternative detection embodiment, there is no separate measurement station. Detection and measurement of an alignment mark takes place at the exposure station but with no liquid in reservoir 10. The liquid reservoir 10 is then filled up and exposure takes place. Similarly level measurement can take place at the exposure station with no liquid in reservoir 10. These measurements can be either off-axis or on-axis.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. The description is not intended to limit the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02257822 | Nov 2002 | EP | regional |
03253692 | Jun 2003 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/853,030, filed Aug. 9, 2010, which is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/318,036, filed Dec. 19, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,795,603, issued on Sep. 14, 2010, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/371,235, filed Mar. 9, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,482,611, issued on Jan. 27, 2009, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/705,816, filed Nov. 12, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,193,232, issued on Mar. 20, 2007, which claims priority from European patent applications EP 02257822.3, filed Nov. 12, 2002, and EP 03253692.2, filed Jun. 11, 2003, all the foregoing applications herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
4280054 | Guarino | Jul 1981 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4999669 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5229872 | Mumola | Jul 1993 | A |
5231291 | Amemiya et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5296891 | Vogt et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5517344 | Hu et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523193 | Nelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5633698 | Imai | May 1997 | A |
5648854 | McCoy et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5883704 | Nishi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5969441 | Loopstra et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997963 | Davison et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6046792 | Van Der Werf et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051843 | Nishi | Apr 2000 | A |
6144719 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6333775 | Haney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6417914 | Li | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421112 | Bisschops et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6521900 | Hirayanagi | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6560032 | Hatano | May 2003 | B2 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633365 | Suenaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650399 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6710849 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6788385 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801301 | Miyajima et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842256 | Hill | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867844 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6952253 | Lof et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954256 | Flagello et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7009682 | Bleeker | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7075616 | Derksen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081943 | Lof et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110081 | Hoogendam et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7193232 | Lof et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199858 | DeSmit et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213963 | Lof et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7359030 | Simon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7388648 | Lof et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394521 | Van Santen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411657 | Ottens et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7978306 | Ottens et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982850 | Lof et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8154708 | Lof et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8482845 | Lof et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564763 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010038442 | Hansell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020018190 | Nogawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026878 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020063856 | Inoue | May 2002 | A1 |
20020145717 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171818 | Minnaert et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030071982 | Miyajima et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095244 | Komatsu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030213921 | Van De Moosdijk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021844 | Suenaga | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041104 | Liebregts et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040263808 | Sewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134815 | Van Santen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050200815 | Akamatsu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219489 | Nei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060023186 | Binnard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090279061 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1341277 | Mar 2002 | CN |
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0502583 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0906590 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1037117 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 477 856 | Nov 2004 | EP |
JP 1571697 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1 571 696 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 628 329 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
S59-019912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
6-084757 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
6-168866 | Jun 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10-154659 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-214783 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-126112 | May 1999 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-239758 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-331931 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-513856 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-170754 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002358556 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004-165666 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-289126 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-012201 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-101488 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-223275 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-277363 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-523377 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-142460 | Jun 2007 | JP |
4362867 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-135857 | Jun 2010 | JP |
9833096 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9838597 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9840791 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
02063613 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004102646 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005031799 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005036624 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005074014 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,136. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 24, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 17, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-281445. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No, 2012-027270. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
Chinese Notification of Completion of Formalities for Registration dated Jul. 1, 2013 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201110083335.0. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,136. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,136. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 03257072.3, dated Jun. 23, 2005. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
Japanese Office Action issued or Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-381339, dated Oct. 18, 2006. |
EP Search Report for EP 02257938 dated Sep. 25, 2003. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003. |
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future Fab International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys, vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
Japanese Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-381339, dated Jun. 6, 2007. |
Examination Report for Application No. 03 257 072.3 dated Mar. 28, 2008. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
Office Action in related application EP03 257 071.5 mailed Dec. 7, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/462,499, titled Landing Pad for Immersion Lithography, filed Apr. 11, 2003 in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. |
Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2011 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200910002111.5. |
European Examination Report dated Apr. 12, 2012 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 03 257 070.7. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-243516. |
U.S. Office Action mailed May 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,932. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938. |
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International Sematech, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-066781. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,136. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830. |
Singapore Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2013 in corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201005011-0. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,190. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
V. LeRoux et al., “A reflection lithography using multicharged ions,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 57-58, pp. 239-245 (Sep. 2001). |
Ivor Brodie et al., “A Multiple-Electron-Beam Exposure System for High-Throughput, Direct-Write Submicrometer Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. EDS-28, No. 11, pp. 1422-1428 (Nov. 1981). |
Yuen-Chuen Chan et al., “Development and applications of a laser writing lithography system for maskless patterning,” Opt. Eng., vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 2521-2530 (Sep. 1998). |
W. Häβler-Grohne et al,, “An electron optical metrology system for pattern placement measurements,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1120-1128 (1998). |
Shoji Maruo et al., “Submicron stereolithography for the production of freely movable mechanisms by using single-photon polymerization,” Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 100, pp. 70-76 (Aug. 2002). |
F. Abboud et al., “Evaluation of the MEBES® 4500 reticle writer to commercial requirements of 250 nm design rule IC devices,” Proc of SPIE, vol. 2793, pp. 438-451 (Jul. 24, 1996). |
Toru Tojo et al., “Advanced electron beam writing system EX-11 for next-generation mask fabrication,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3748, pp. 416-425 (Sep. 1999). |
Yoshiyuki Tomita et al., “A surface motor-driven precise positioning system,” Precision Engineering, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 184-191 (Jul. 1994). |
Chang-Woo Lee et al., “An ultraprecision stage for alignment of wafers in advanced microlithography,” Precision Engineering, vol. 21, No. 2/3, pp. 113-122, (Sep./Dec. 1997). |
H. Löschner et al., “Ion projection lithography for vacuum microelectronics,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 487-492 (Mar./Apr. 1993). |
Hans Loeschner et al., “Large-Field Ion-Optics for Projection and Proximity Printing and for Mask-Less Lithography (ML2),” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4688, pp. 595-606 (Jul. 2002). |
Won-jong Kim et al., “Modeling and Vector Control of Planar Magnetic Levitator,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1254-1262 (Nov./Dec. 1998). |
Rodney Kendall et al., “A servo guided X—Y—theta stage for electron beam lithography,” J. Vac. Sci, Technol, B, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 3019-3023 (Nov./Dec. 1991). |
T. Kato et al., “Submicron pattern fabrication by focused ion beams,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol, B, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 50-53 (Jan./Feb. 1985). |
Hans C. Pfeiffer, “PREVAIL: Proof-of-Concept System and Results,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 61-66 (2000). |
L.M. Buchmann et al., “Lithography with High Depth of Focus by an Ion Projection System,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 116-120 (Sep. 1992). |
T.C. Bailey et al., “Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: An Efficient Nanoscale Printing Technology,” Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 481-486 (Jan. 2002). |
Oui-Serg Kim et al., “Positioning Performance and Straightness Error Compensation of the Magnetic Levitation Stage Supported by the Linear Magnetic Bearing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 374-378 (Apr. 2003). |
Ampere A. Tseng et al., “Electron Beam Lithography in Nanoscale Fabrication: Recent Development,” IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 141-149 (Apr. 2003). |
Qing Ji, “Maskless, Resistless Ion Beam Lithography Processes,” University of Berkeley, 128 pages (Spring 2003). |
Rik Kneppers, “HP Laser Interferometers,” Vaisala News, vol. 151, pp. 34-37 (1999). |
R.S. Dhaliwal et al., “PREVAIL—Electron projection technology approach for next-generation lithography,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 615-638 (Sep. 2001). |
Kazuaki Suzuki, “EPL Technology Development,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4754, pp. 775-789 (Jul. 2002). |
G. Stengl et al., “Current status of Ion Projection Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 537, pp. 138-145 (1985). |
Ernst Thielicke et al., “Microactuators and their technologies,” Mechatronics, vol. 10, pp. 431-455 (2000). |
G. Stangl et al., “Submicron Lithography and DUV-Master Masks Made by Ion Projection Lithography,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 167-171 (1985). |
G. Stengl et al., “Ion projection lithography machine IPLM01: A new tool for sub-0.5-micron modification of materials,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 194-200 (Jan./Feb. 1986). |
Carl G. Chen et al., “Nanometer-accurate Grating Fabrication with Scanning Beam Interference Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4936, pp. 126-134 (Nov. 2002). |
G. de Zwart et al., “Performance of a Step and Scan System for DUV Lithography,” SPIE Symposium on Optical Microlithography in Santa Clara, pp. 0-18 (Mar. 1997). |
Jan Mulkens et al., “ASML Optical Lithography Solutions for 65 nm and 45 nm Node,” Semicon Japan, pp. 1-29, (Dec. 5, 2003). |
Arnold et al., “193nm Immersion Lithography,” International Sematech Litho Forum, Slides 1-22, (Jan. 28, 2004). |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Patent Application No. 13/306,532. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130128256 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12318036 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 12853030 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12853030 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13692865 | US | |
Parent | 11371235 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12318036 | US | |
Parent | 10705816 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11371235 | US |