This invention is concerned with diodes, and more particularly diodes exhibiting low on-state forward voltage and reduced parasitic resistance.
A diode is an electronic component that restricts the direction of movement of charge carriers. The diode essentially allows an electric current to flow in one direction, but substantially blocks current flow in the opposite direction.
Diode rectifiers are one of the most widely used devices in low voltage switching, power supplies, power converters and related applications. For efficient operation, it is desirable for such diodes to operate with low on-state voltage (a forward voltage drop Vf of 0.1-0.4V or lower), low reverse leakage current, a voltage blocking capability of 20-30V, and high switching speed. These features are important to achieve high conversion efficiency, which is the final goal of any rectifier for low voltage applications.
The most common diodes are based on semiconductor pn-junctions, typically using silicon (Si), with impurity elements introduced to modify, in a controlled manner, the diode's operating characteristics. Diodes can also be formed from other semiconductor materials, such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) and silicon carbide (SiC). In a pn diode, conventional current can flow from the p-type side (the anode) to the n-type side (the cathode), but not in the opposite direction.
A semiconductor diode's current-voltage, or I-V, characteristic curve is attributable to the depletion layer or depletion zone that exists at the pn junction between the differing semiconductor layers. When a pn junction is first created, conduction band (mobile) electrons from the n-doped region diffuse into the p-doped region, where there is a large population of holes (locations for electrons where no electron is present) with which the electrons can “recombine”. When a mobile electron recombines with a hole, the hole vanishes and the electron is no longer mobile, i.e., two charge carriers are eliminated. The region around the p-n junction becomes depleted of charge carriers and thus behaves as an insulator.
The width of the depletion zone, however, cannot grow without limit. For each electron-hole pair that recombines, a positively charged dopant ion is left behind in the n-doped region and a negatively charged dopant ion is left behind in the p-doped region. As recombination proceeds and more ions are created, an increasing electric field develops through the depletion zone, which acts to slow and then eventually stop recombination. At this point, there is a ‘built-in’ potential across the depletion zone.
If an external voltage is placed across the diode with the same polarity as the built-in potential, the depletion zone continues to act as an insulator, preventing any significant electric current. This is the reverse bias phenomenon. If the polarity of the external voltage opposes the built-in potential, however, recombination can once again proceed, resulting in substantial electric current through the p-n junction. For silicon diodes, the built-in potential is approximately 0.6 V. Thus, if an external current is passed through the diode, about 0.6 V will be developed across the diode, causing the p-doped region to be positive with respect to the n-doped region. The diode is said to be ‘turned on’, as it has a forward bias.
A diode's I-V characteristic can be approximated by two regions of operation. Below a certain difference is potential between the two leads attached to the diode, the depletion layer has significant width, and the diode can be thought of as an open (non-conductive) circuit. As the potential difference is increased, at some point the diode will become conductive and allow charges to flow. The diode can then be considered as a circuit element with zero (or at least very low) resistance. In a normal silicon diode at rated currents, the voltage drop across a conducting diode is approximately 0.6 to 0.7 volts.
In the reverse bias region for a normal p-n rectifier diode, the current through the device is very low (in the μA range) for all reverse voltages up to a point called the peak inverse voltage (PIV). Beyond this point, a process called reverse breakdown occurs, which causes the device to be damaged, accompanied by a large increase in current.
One disadvantage of a junction diode is that, during forward conduction, the power loss in the diode can become excessive for large current flow. Another type of diode, the Schottky barrier diode, utilizes a rectifying metal-to-semiconductor barrier instead of a pn junction. The junction between the metal and the semiconductor establishes a barrier region that, when properly fabricated, will minimize charge storage effects and improve the switching performance of the diode by shortening its turn-off time. [L. P. Hunter, Physics of Semiconductor Materials, Devices, and Circuits, Semiconductor Devices, Page 1-10 (1970)].
Common Schottky diodes have a lower forward voltage drop than pn-junction diodes and are thus more desirable in applications where energy losses in the diode can have a significant negative impact on the performance of the system, e.g., where diodes are used as output rectifiers in a switching power supply. For such applications, it is highly desirable to provide a rectifier with a very low forward voltage drop (0.1-0.4V), reduced reverse leakage current, low voltage blocking capability (20-30V), and high switching speed. These features are important to achieve high conversion efficiency, which is the final goal of any rectifier that is to be used for low voltage applications.
Schottky diodes can be used as low loss rectifiers, although their reverse leakage current is generally much higher than other rectifier designs. Schottky diodes are majority carrier devices; as such, they do not suffer from minority carrier storage problems that slow down most normal diodes. They also tend to have much lower junction capacitance than pn diodes, which contributes to their high switching speed.
One way to reduce the on-state voltage below 0.5V in a conventional Schottky diode is to reduce the diode's surface barrier potential. Reducing the barrier potential, however, results in a tradeoff of increased reverse leakage current. In addition, the reduced barrier can degrade high temperature operation and result in soft breakdown characteristics under reverse bias operation.
In addition, for Schottky diodes that are made of GaAs; one disadvantage of this material is that the Fermi level (or surface potential) is fixed or pinned at approximately 0.7 volts. (Si Schottky diodes also have this limitation to a certain extent.) As a result, the on-state forward voltage (Vf) is fixed. Regardless of the type of metal used to contact the semiconductor, the surface potential in such a diode cannot be lowered to lower Vf.
One solution to this limitation with GaAs is the gallium nitride (GaN) material system. GaN has a 3.4 eV wide direct bandgap, high electron velocity (2×107 cm/s), high breakdown fields (2×106 V/cm) and the availability of heterostructures. GaN based low voltage diodes can achieve reduced forward voltage drops in comparison with conventional Schottky diode rectifiers (See, e.g., Parikh, et al., Gallium Nitride Based Diodes with Low Forward voltage and Low Reverse Current Operation, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/445,130, filed May 20, 2003, which is commonly assigned and the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference as if described in its entirety).
GaN low voltage diodes, however, can be typically fabricated on a SiC or GaN substrate. For a vertical diode device, the substrate is in the conductive path and contributes to the voltage drops. With typical substrate resistivity values of around 20-30 mohm-cm for SiC/GaN substrates, a 200 μm thick substrate will add 40-60 mV of voltage drop at an operating current density of 100 A/cm2. This additional voltage drop is unacceptable, since the target for total voltage drop at operating current is <200 mV. Furthermore, for the most commonly used SiC substrate (GaN substrates are expensive and small in diameter), an additional barrier is encountered at the GaN epi-SiC substrate interface. While there are techniques used to mitigate this barrier, they add extra complexity and may also contribute to increased resistance.
Consequently, a need has developed in the art for diodes that can be operated with lower forward voltage drops.
This invention provides a semiconductor diode structure and method for fabrication a diode structure that substantially reduces parasitic resistance in the diode and eliminates the associated resistive voltage drops.
A method of making a diode involves depositing an n+ semiconducting buffer layer on a substrate, depositing an n− semiconducting layer on the n+ layer, depositing a semiconducting barrier layer on the n− layer, and depositing a dielectric layer on the barrier layer. A portion of the dielectric layer is then removed, and a Schottky metal is deposited on the barrier layer in the void left by the removed portion. The dielectric layer and the Schottky metal are affixed to a conductive support layer with a metal bonding layer, the substrate is removed to expose the n+ layer, portions of the n+, n−, and barrier layers are selectively removed to form a mesa diode structure on the dielectric layer over the Schottky metal; and an ohmic contact is deposited on the n+ layer.
A second method of making a diode, is similar to the first, except that, after depositing a Schottky metal on the barrier layer, selective portions of the n+ and n− layers are removed to form a mesa diode structure under the Schottky metal, the substrate is removed under the mesa diode structure to form a via, and an ohmic contact is deposited on the n+ layer in the via.
A third method of making a diode is similar to the second method, except that the substrate is a GaN substrate and that, after selective portions of the n+ and n− layers are removed to form a mesa diode structure, the GaN substrate is thinned to reduce parasitic substrate resistance and the ohmic contact is deposited on the thinned substrate.
In more particular embodiments, the n+ layer, the n− layer, and the barrier layer comprise Group III nitrides. A nucleation layer may be deposited on the substrate, prior to depositing the n+ layer on the substrate. The nucleation layer may be AlxGa1-xN, and the n+ layer may be n+ doped GaN, particularly, a layer of GaN between 0.5 and 5 μm thick and doped with an impurity concentration of between 5×1017/cm3 and 5×1019/cm3.
The n− layer may be n− doped GaN, particularly, a layer of GaN between 0.5 and 5 μm thick and doped with an impurity concentration of between 1×1015/cm3 and 1×1017/cm3. The barrier layer may be AlGaN, particularly a layer with 30% Al for the AlxGa1-xN with 15≦x≦45. The thickness of the barrier layer may be between 0-30 A, particularly 5 A. The dielectric layer may be a SiO2 dielectric layer. The Schottky metal may be selected from the group consisting of Cr, Ge, Fe, Mn, Nb, Ni, NiCr, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W, preferably Cr.
The conductive support layer may be metallized Si, while the dielectric layer may be affixed to the support layer with a metal bonding layer using an Au—Sn Eutectic wafer bonding process. The ohmic contact material may be selected from the group consisting of Al/Au and Ti/Au or other suitable ohmic contacts to n+ GaN. Removing the substrate to expose the n+ layer may be accomplished using reactive ion etching. After affixing the dielectric layer to the support layer with a metal bonding layer, a backside bonding layer may be affixed to the support layer opposite the dielectric layer.
This invention provides rectifier diodes with very low forward voltage (Vf) values, for use in applications such as high efficiency power supplies, as well as other applications such as low voltage switching power supplies and power converters.
In one embodiment of a method according to the present invention provides full-wafer bonding of gallium nitride devices on a SiC substrate with front-side processing completed, to a metalized wafer carrier wafer. The SiC substrate is removed and ohmic contacts are places directly on the n+ GaN epitaxial layer. This eliminates the GaN—SiC interface barrier/resistance path as well as the SiC substrate resistance path. This helps minimize or reduce the parasitic resistive voltage drops.
It is also understood that when an element such as a layer, region or substrate is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. Furthermore, relative terms such as “inner”, “outer”, “upper”, “above”, “lower”, “beneath”, and “below”, and similar terms, may be used herein to describe a relationship of one layer or another region. It is understood that these terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures.
Embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to cross-sectional view illustrations that are schematic illustrations of idealized embodiments of the invention. As such, variations from the shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances are expected. Embodiments of the invention should not be construed as limited to the particular shapes of the regions illustrated herein but are to include deviations in shapes that result, for example, from manufacturing. A region illustrated or described as square or rectangular will typically have rounded or curved features due to normal manufacturing tolerances. Thus, the regions illustrated in the figures are schematic in nature and their shapes are not intended to illustrate the precise shape of a region of a device and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The preferred diode 100 is fabricated using the Group-III nitride based material system. Group-III nitrides include the semiconductor compounds formed between nitrogen and the elements in Group-III of the periodic table, usually aluminum (Al), gallium (Ga), and indium (In). This group also includes ternary and tertiary compounds such as AlGaN and AlInGaN. The preferred materials for the diode are GaN and AlGaN.
The diode 100 includes a substrate 102 of conductive material, that can be made of different materials but is preferable metallized silicon (Si) that acts as a conductive support layer for the device. A metal bonding layer 104 connects the support layer 102 to a Schottky metal layer 106. A semiconducting AlGaN barrier layer 108 is disposed on the Schottky layer opposite the bonding layer, with an n− semiconducting GaN layer 110 disposed on the barrier layer. An n+ semiconducting GaN buffer layer 112 is disposed on the n− layer. Finally, an ohmic contact 114, which provides an electrical connection to the diode through the layer 112, is disposed on the layer 112.
One method of making the diode depicted in
The method begins, as depicted in
Next, as shown in
In
A semiconducting barrier layer 108 of AlxGa1-xN, as shown in
Next, as depicted in
The metal should be chosen to provide a low Schottky barrier potential and low Vf, but high enough so that the reverse current remains low. If the metal chosen, for example, had a work function equal to the semiconductor's electron affinity, the barrier potential would approach zero (except in the case of a tunnel diode), resulting in a Vf that approaches zero and also increases the diode's reverse current, such that the diode would become ohmic in nature and provide no rectification.
The dielectric layer 120 is used as a protective layer and can be removed selectively at various points in the process. Alternatively, the Schottky metal could be deposited in a complete layer, then etched off later to define the Schottky barrier contact.
At this point, as shown in
The tensile stress effect can be ameliorated by adding an optional backside bonding layer 122 to the backside of the layer 104 (the backside bonding layer should be contacted by a nonmetallic surface during the bond process, to ensure that it adheres only to the support layer 102, and not to the bond tool). With the additional bond layer, tensile stress is introduced in both bonding layers upon cool down. The stress in the backside bonding layer counteracts the stress introduced by the bond layer 102 to minimize the bowing after the removal of the substrate 118.
Next, as depicted in
As shown in
Low voltage diodes were fabricated by the method above, with a 2 μm thick n+ layer doped to 1×1018/cm3, a 1 μm thick n− layer doped to 1×1016/cm3, and a thin 5 Å barrier layer of approximate composition Al0.3Ga0.7N. An Al/Au ohmic contact was used. Standard dicing techniques were performed to obtain individual devices.
This diode structure exhibits minimal parasitic resistance. Besides yielding a low Vf, these diode may be operable at a current density of greater than 100 A/cm2, hence improving capacitance per unit amperage. At the 1 A level, these devices began to show the impact of current spreading, because the total metal thickness for the ohmic contact was less than 0.5 μm. Metal thickening, to increase the ohmic metal to greater than 2 μm, should ameliorate this issue. Because of the low intrinsic barrier for these devices, they could be operated at a high forward current of 200 A/cm2, thereby gaining a capacitance advantage.
These devices were then packaged using standard Ag—Sn based die attachment techniques. The results for the packaged diodes are shown in
The diode of the invention can also be made in alternative embodiments. Instead of complete removal of the substrate, for example, a via can be etched in the substrate to remove the material under the active device and to retain the remainder of the substrate material for mechanical support. A diode 200, made according to this second embodiment, is depicted in
Selected portions of the n+, n−, and buffer layers are then removed to form a mesa diode structure under the Schottky metal. Finally, a portion of the substrate 218 and the nucleation layer 216 is removed under the mesa diode structure to form a via, then an ohmic contact layer 214 is deposited on the substrate and in the via, such that the ohmic contact layer electrically connects with the n+ layer 212.
A third embodiment of the diode can be implemented on a bulk GaN wafer, with the bulk GaN wafer being subsequently thinned to reduce parasitic substrate resistance. The bulk GaN wafer does not need to be completely removed since there is no heterostructure epi-substrate interface, as with the GaN diode fabricated on a SiC substrate. Other than the elimination of this interfacial voltage drop, reduction of substrate parasitic will be a function of the extent of thinning of the GaN substrate wafer.
The third embodiment is shown as the diode 300, as depicted in
Selected portions of the n+, n−, and buffer layers are then removed to form a mesa diode structure under the Schottky metal. The GaN substrate 318 is thinned sufficiently to reduce parasitic resistance associated with the substrate, then an ohmic contact layer 314 is deposited on the substrate.
The preferred embodiments of this invention have been illustrated and described above. Modifications and additional embodiments, however, will undoubtedly be apparent to those skilled in the art. Furthermore, equivalent elements may be substituted for those illustrated and described herein, parts or connections might be reversed or otherwise interchanged, and certain features of the invention may be utilized independently of other features. Consequently, the exemplary embodiments should be considered illustrative, rather than inclusive, while the appended claims are more indicative of the full scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional from, and claims the benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/905,374, to Parikh et al., which is a divisional from, and claims the benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/655,696, to Parikh et al., both of which have the same title as the present application.
This invention was made with Government support under DARPA Contract No. 4400129974 (as subcontractor—Raytheon as prime). The Government has certain rights in this invention
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3886580 | Calviello | May 1975 | A |
3896479 | Di Lorenzo | Jul 1975 | A |
4152044 | Liu | May 1979 | A |
4675575 | Smith et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4946547 | Palmour et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5034783 | Chang et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5200022 | Kong et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
RE34861 | Davis et al. | Feb 1995 | E |
5477436 | Bertling et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5612567 | Baliga | Mar 1997 | A |
5705321 | Brueck et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6172382 | Nagahama et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6330111 | Myers | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331915 | Myers | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6372536 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6504179 | Ellens et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515313 | Ibbetson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521915 | Odaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6611003 | Hatakoshi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6657393 | Natsume | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6693357 | Borst et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6746889 | Eliashevich et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765242 | Chang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784463 | Camras et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6932497 | Huang | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6943381 | Gardner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7087936 | Negley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7491626 | Gaska et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20020015013 | Ragle | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020054495 | Natsume | May 2002 | A1 |
20020195619 | Makimoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015708 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030085409 | Shen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030218183 | Micovic et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040057482 | Wang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080010 | Parikh et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040207313 | Omoto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261692 | Dwilinski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262576 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030995 | Kawakami et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048766 | Wu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077535 | Li | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117320 | Leu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152127 | Kamiya et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173692 | Park | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050173728 | Saxler | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213625 | Horie | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060081862 | Chua et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060158899 | Avabe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060220046 | Yu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267031 | Tasch et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070090383 | Ota et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070268694 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080023689 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036364 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074032 | Yano et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20110193057 | Sabathil et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1063711 | Dec 1920 | EP |
0 272 985 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0881666 | Feb 1998 | EP |
WO9831055 | Jul 1998 | EP |
WO9905728 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0936682 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0936682 | Aug 1999 | EP |
WO9946822 | Sep 1999 | EP |
WO0076004 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1189289 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1313187 | May 2003 | EP |
1349202 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1653255 | May 2006 | EP |
1681509 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2048718 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2586844 | Mar 1987 | FR |
2759188 | Aug 1998 | FR |
2814220 | Mar 2002 | FR |
11330552 | Nov 1966 | JP |
S62138841 | Jun 1987 | JP |
S63-288061 | Nov 1988 | JP |
H05-075101 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H05-283672 | Oct 1993 | JP |
3191447 | May 1994 | JP |
6268257 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7162038 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7176826 | Jul 1995 | JP |
8023124 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8070139 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8162671 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8274414 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9330630 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9148678 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9153642 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9162444 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11040850 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9219556 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10012969 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10041581 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10065271 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10145000 | May 1998 | JP |
10145002 | May 1998 | JP |
H10312990 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10335757 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11074562 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11186659 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11191638 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11224972 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11238945 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11251684 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11298090 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-049363 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000068594 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-150920 | May 2000 | JP |
2000133883 | May 2000 | JP |
2000150956 | May 2000 | JP |
2000244072 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000307149 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001168471 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001217467 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001332770 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002512379 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002270515 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002543594 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002543594 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-59938 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-152219 | May 2003 | JP |
2003209283 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003218383 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003258313 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003318449 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003533030 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004276383 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004281605 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005191514 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005228833 | Aug 2005 | JP |
WO2005119799 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2007-036010 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-189239 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007189239 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2009094517 | Apr 2009 | JP |
WO 9837585 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9856043 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO0021143 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 01-41224 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 02-01608 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0205399 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0211212 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO0211212 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03080763 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03044870 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03080763 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2004084316 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2004084316 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2004109813 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2004109813 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005098976 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005098976 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005104247 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO2007005844 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007005844 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007075815 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2008020913 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008020913 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Examination Report from European Patent Appl. No. 07 254 498.1, dated Aug. 9, 2013. |
Decision of Appeal from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2008-262602, dated Jul. 5, 2013. |
Examination Report from Canadian Patent Appl. No. 2,454,310, dated Sep. 5, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated May 22, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed Jul. 23, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, dated May 14, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, dated Nov. 17, 2011. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, filed Mar. 19, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Nov. 29, 2011. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed May 29, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Jul. 9, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed Sep. 26, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, dated Apr. 5, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, filed Jul. 2, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Feb. 14, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed May 14, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, filed Feb. 21, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, dated Jan. 15, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, filed Apr. 9, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, filed Oct. 16, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/826,305, dated Apr. 4, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/826,305, filed Jul. 1, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/954,034, dated Oct. 24, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Jul. 30, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed Oct. 23, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,715, dated Feb. 14, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,715, filed May 1, 2013. |
Official Action from European Patent Appl. No. 11154411.0, dated Feb. 27, 2013. |
Decision of Patent Grant from Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-143451, dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
Interrogation from Japanese Patent App. No. 2006-533962, dated Dec. 10, 2013. |
Appeal Board's Questioning from Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-262602, dated Dec. 14, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection and Decision of Dismissal of Amendment from Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-143451, dated Nov. 13, 2012. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-143451, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
Examination of European Patent Application No. 08 253 301.9-2222, dated Apr. 24, 2012. |
Decision for Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-182592, dated Jul. 3, 2012. |
Summary of Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-262602, dated May 8, 2012. |
Summary of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-264568 mailed Nov. 15, 2011. |
Summary of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-182592 mailed Nov. 22, 2011. |
M.A.L. Johnson, et al., New UV Light Emitter Based on AlGaN Heterostructures with Graded Electron and Hole Injectors, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 743, 2003, pp. 481-486. |
Simon, John, et al., Polarization-Induced 3-Dimension Electron Slabs in Graded AlGaN Layers, Material Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 892, 2006, pp. 417-422. |
Summary of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2007-292302 mailed Jan. 24, 2012. |
Examination Report for counterpart European Patent Application No. 07254498.4 dated Jan. 26, 2012. |
“The American Heritage Dictionary”, Library of Congress, New College Ed., 1976, pp. 867. |
“Properties of Delta Doped Al0.25Ga0.75N and GaN Epitaxial Layers”, Jeffrey S. Flynn, et al, Materials Research Society, 1 page. |
“III-nitride ultraviolet light-emitting diodes with delta doping”, K.H. Kim, et al, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, No. 3, Jul. 21, 2003, pp. 566-568. |
“Reduction of threading edge dislocation density in n-type GaN by Si delta-doping”, Y.B. Pan, et al, Journal of Crystal Growth 286 (2006) 255-258. |
“Epitaxial Growth and Characterisation of Silicon Delta-Doped GaAs, AlAs and AlxGa1-xAs”, B. Sciana, et al, Crystal Res. Technol. 36 2001 8-10, pp. 1145-1154. |
“Effects of periodic delta-doping on the properties of GaN:Si films grown on Si (111) substrates” L.S. Wang, et al, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 34, Dec. 13, 2004, pp. 5881-5884. |
“The effect of periodic silane burst on the properties of GaN on Si (111) substrates”, Zang Keyan, et al, Singapore-MIT Alliance, E4-04-10 & Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering 4 pages. |
European Search Report, EP 03 07 8515, dated: Feb. 2, 2004. |
Partial European Search Report, EP 09 15 7557, dated: May 28, 2009. |
Non-final Rejection, Korean Appl. No. 10-2003-7012710, dated: Aug. 8, 2008. |
Non-final Rejection, Korean Appl. No. 10-2008-7026427, dated: Jan. 23, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/900,952, Dated: May 26, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,246, Dated: Oct. 21, 2011. |
Summary of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-262602 mailed Jul. 12, 2011. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,454,310 dated Aug. 30, 2011. |
Summary of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-292302 dated Oct. 4, 2011. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2007-143451 dated May 10, 2011. |
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11154411.0 dated May 30, 2011. |
Singh Madhusudan, et al., “Examination of Tunnel Junctions in the AlGaN/GaN System: Consequences of Polarization Charge”, Applied Physics Letters, AIP, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, vol. 77, No. 12, Sep. 18, 2000, pp. 1867-1969. |
Panda A.K. et al., “DC and High-Frequency Characteristics of GaN Based Impatts”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, IEEE Service Center, Pisacataway, NJ, US vol. 48, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2001, pp. 820-823. |
Invitation to Submit Applicant's Opinion (Summary) in Japanese Appeal Filing No. 2009-007421, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-529535 mailed Dec. 7, 2010. |
Examiner's Report to the Board (Summary) in Japanese Appeal Filing No. 2009-007421, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-529535 mailed Dec. 7, 2010. |
Notification of National Application Upon the Preliminary Examination of Patent Application from Chinese Patent Application No. 200880100370.5 dated Jun. 1, 2010. |
Notification on Publication and Entry into Procedure of Substantive Examination of Invention Patent Application from Chinese Patent Application No. 200880100370.5 dated Aug. 18, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,692, filed Dec. 20, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/614,180, filed Dec. 21, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/624,811, filed Jan. 19, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,754, filed May 3, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,982, filed May 22, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/753,103, filed May 24, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,990, filed May 22, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,153, filed May 30, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/856,421, filed Sep. 17, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,048, filed Sep. 21, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/939,047, filed Nov. 13, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/936,163, filed Nov. 7, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/843,243, filed Aug. 22, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/939,052, filed Nov. 13, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,799, filed Apr. 18, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,038, filed Oct. 23, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/870,679, filed Oct. 11, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/948,041, filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/949,222, filed Dec. 3, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/174,053, filed Jul. 16, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,429, filed Dec. 4, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,729, filed Mar. 11, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/818,818, filed Jun. 14, 2007. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/443,741, filed Jun. 14, 2007. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/685,761, filed Mar. 13, 2007. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/939,059, filed Nov. 13, 2007. |
L.P. Hunter, Physics of Semiconductor Material Devices and Circuits, Semiconductor Devices p. 1-10, (1970). |
Related Preliminary Korean Office Action , Korean Application No. 10-2004-7001033, dated Nov. 28, 2008. |
The Second Office Action from People's Republic of China, re: China Application No. 200480027969.2, Date: Jul. 4, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/004453, Date: Sep. 9, 2008. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/004453, Date: Sep. 9, 2008. |
Kim J K et al. “Strongly Enhanced Phosphor Efficiency in GaInN White Light-Emitting Diodes Using Remote Phosphor Configuration and Diffuse Reflector Cup”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, Tokyo, JP, vol. 44, No. 20-23, Jan. 1, 2005, XP-001236966. |
Extended Search Report from the European Patent Office re related European Patent Application No. 08160129.6, dated Dec. 15, 2008. |
Asbeck P M. et al “Enhancement of Base Conductivity Via the Piezoelectric Effect in AlGaN/BaN HBTs”, Solid State Electronics, Elsevier Science Publishers, Barking GB, vol. 44, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 211-219, p. 213, left-hand column. |
Johnson M A L et al. “New UV Light Emitter Based on AlGaN Heterostructures with Graded Electron and Hole Injectors”, Materials Research Society Symposium—Proceedings 2002 Materials Research Society US, vol. 743, 2002, pp. 481-486, abstract; figure 2. |
Simon J et al, “Polarization-induced 3-dimensional Electron Slabs in Graded AlGaN Layeras”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 2006 Materials Research Society US, vol. 892, Nov. 28, 2005, pp. 417-422, abstract, 1 and 4. |
Notice Requesting Submission of Opinion re related Korean application No. 10-2004-7001033, dated: Mar. 9, 2009. |
Zhang et al. “Comparison of GaN P—I—N and Schottky Rectifier Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 407-411. |
Sakai et al., “Experimental Investigation of Dependence of Electrical Characteristics on Device Parameters in Trench MOS Barrier Schottky Diodes”, 1998, International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, Kyoto, pp. 293-296. |
European Search Report re related European Application No. 08253301.9-2222. Feb. 24, 2009. |
European Search Report re related EP Appl. 08160129.6.2222, Dated: Dec. 15, 2008. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/US2007/086237, date: May 8, 2008 in related application. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/US2007/12403, Date: Aug. 6, 2008. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/US2007/086242, Date: Mar. 4, 2008. |
Notice of First Office Action from China Patent Application No. 200710142217.6 dated: Jun. 22, 2009. |
Official Communication from the EPO regarding European Application No. 08253301.9, dated Nov. 17, 2009. |
Second Office action from related Chinese Application No. 200710142217.6, dated: Nov. 6, 2009. |
European Search Report from related European Application No. 07254498.4. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/600,617, dated: Dec. 22, 2009. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/600,617, Dated: Mar. 18, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Nov. 17, 2008. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Jan. 16, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Apr. 6, 2009. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Jun. 8, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Jul. 6, 2009. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, dated: Jan. 6, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696 mailed Apr. 2, 2010. |
Request for Continued Examination Filed Jun. 18, 2010 U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/655,696, mailed Jul. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Apr. 25, 2014. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed Jun. 4, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,715, dated May 21, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/974,431, filed Oct. 22, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/954,034, dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/954,034, filed Oct. 24, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,715, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
Intention to Grant from European Patent Appl. No. 11 154 411.0-1555. dated Nov 17. 2014. |
Summons to attend oral proceedings from European Appl. No. 08253301.9-1564. dated Dec. 12, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance from Canadian Patent Appl. No. 2,454,310, dated Jan. 6, 2015. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/954.034. dated Dec. 31, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,715, dated Jan. 13, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130126894 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12905374 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13693929 | US | |
Parent | 11655696 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12905374 | US |