None.
The instant invention pertains to machines that have a treatment tool for processing (e.g., grinding/lapping/polishing/texturing) a work piece so that a surface of the work piece has a desired elevation or profile (i.e., a “figure”), and desired texture (roughness/smoothness). The treatment tool may be part of a larger working head assembly.
Chucks, such as pin chucks, are used to hold flat components for processing. The most common use is to hold wafers (Si, SiC, GaAs, GaN, Sapphire, other) during processing to yield a semiconductor device. Other uses include holding substrates during the fabrication of flat panel displays, solar cells and other such manufactured products. These chucking components are known by many names, including wafer chucks, wafer tables, wafer handling devices, etc.
The use of pins on these devices is to provide minimum chuck-to-substrate contact. Minimum contact reduces contamination and enhances the ability to maintain high flatness. The pin tops need to have low wear in use to maximize life and precision. The pin tops also need to be low friction so the substrate easily slides on and off, and lies flat on the pins.
A pin chuck consists of a rigid body with a plurality of pins on the surface on which the substrate to be processed (e.g., Si wafer) rests. The pins exist in many geometries, and go by many names including burls, mesas, bumps, proud lands, proud rings, etc.
Regardless of whether the chuck is of the “pin” type or not, the surface that supports whatever is to be chucked (e.g., a semiconductor wafer) needs to be flat to a very high degree of precision. In the case of semiconductor lithography, the flatness is measured in nanometers (nm).
Machines exist, for example, those used in a “deterministic” fashion, to locally correct errors in flatness (surface elevation). Some techniques for this deterministic correction include, but not limited to, Ion Beam Figuring (IBF), Magneto Rheological Finishing (MRF), and computer controlled polishing (CCP). As used herein, the phrase “deterministic correction” means that figure, elevation or roughness data as measured for example, by an interferometer or profilometer, is fed into a finishing machine such as a lapping machine. The input may consist of one or more algorithms for optimizations such as convolution or transforms to optimize the tool path or footprint in such a manner that the machine most rapidly converges to the desired target shape with a minimal amount of time, cost or risk. It effectively treats those areas of the work piece that are in error and need processing (e.g., grinding, lapping or texturing), while minimizing the effort spent working on areas that are not in need or alteration. The machine does not automatically treat the entire surface of the work piece.
The instant invention is not limited to machines that operate deterministically, but it will focus on those that employ physical contact of a tool here termed a “treatment tool” with the surface of a work piece to be processed to physically remove material from the work piece through grinding, lapping, texturing and/or polishing.
One problem with this “R-theta” arrangement is that the treatment tool cannot process regions on the work piece that are very close to, or at, the center of the theta axis.
The machine of the instant invention addresses this problem, and provides a solution.
A machine featuring a treatment tool that contacts the surface of a work piece to grind that surface to a desired profile, impart a desired roughness to that surface, and remove contamination from the surface. The machine is configured to control multiple independent input variables simultaneously, the controllable variables selected from the group consisting of (i) velocity, (ii) rotation, and (iii) dither of the treatment tool, and (iv) pressure of the treatment tool against the surface. The machine can move the treatment tool with six degrees of freedom.
A machine as shown in
The machine may be operated or programmed to function or respond deterministically to inputted data such as interferometer or profilometer data reporting on the elevation and/or roughness of a surface. In response to this inputted data, the machine directs the treatment tool to operate only on those spots or regions of the surface that require treatment.
In a first aspect of the invention, the treatment tool may have a number of degrees of freedom. First, it may translate in three dimensions, for example, along three orthogonal axes. Next, it may be mounted or attached to a shaft that can rotate. Further, the treatment tool can be mounted on the rotational axis of the shaft, or it can be mounted off-axis; that is, it can be mounted a certain distance away radially from said axis. Still further, the treatment tool can move radially with respect to the rotational axis. Additionally, the machine can be configured to impart “dither” to the treatment tool.
These degrees of freedom may be better illustrated with respect to the drawings.
The machine of the present invention also has these two degrees of freedom, as depicted in
Power for the various motions may be supplied by electric motor(s), which may be stepping motors or linear motors or common the art. Rails 21, 23, 25 mounted to table 27 may help guide the motions in the X and Y-directions. The rails may have mechanical contact bearings or air bearings or other low friction techniques known in the art.
Additionally, the machine can be configured to impart “dither” to the treatment tool. The nature of the dither can be random, orbital or linear. One way to impart such dither to the treatment tool is to adjust the adjuster screw so that the U axis is slightly offset from the B axis (slight amount of r), allowing the toroid (
The treatment tool is 27 mm in diameter. By outward appearance, it is a disc, but in reality it has a slight toroidal shape (
The same treatment tool may be used in cleaning, profiling and roughening modes, depending upon how the tool is used. For example, given a 27 mm diameter tool fabricated from reaction bonded silicon carbide, for cleaning debris off of a wafer chuck of similar hardness, a dead weight loading of 5-50 grains, and a tool velocity of 5-30 mm/sec may be used. For profiling (e.g., flattening) a surface, the loading may be 100-175 grams, and the tool velocity may be 20-50 mm/sec. For imparting surface roughness, the tool loading may be in excess of 150 grains, and the tool velocity relative to the surface being processed may be 20-50 mm/sec.
The treatment tool may be provided in different sizes (diameter or effective diameter), depending on the size of the features or region on the work piece to be processed. For example, a smaller diameter treatment tool (for example, about 10 mm) may be used to treat recessed regions on a wafer chuck, such as the vacuum seal ring on a vacuum chuck.
Moreover, the machine can be configured to house more than one working head, and as shown in
In addition to the spatial degrees of freedom, and in a second aspect of the invention, the machine can be designed or programmed to respond to a number of other independent variables, which variables can be inputted to the machine simultaneously. In particular, the pressure that the treatment tool applies against the surface to be treated can be controlled, as can the amplitude and frequency of treatment tool dither.
The treatment tool component of the working head may be minimally constrained. That is, its orientation with respect to the surface to be treated is not fixed or prescribed. Rather, the treatment tool orients itself, or conforms to the surface, once it is brought into contact with the surface to be treated.
In a second aspect of the invention, existing machines can be modified with a “bolt-on” module to upgrade the capabilities of other machines machine. The module would be incorporated into an existing precision machine tool, such as a semiconductor lithography machine as shown in
Moreover, since Applicant has discovered that changing the pressure at which the treatment tool contacts the surface to be treated changes the mode of operation from de-contamination to processing, that is, grinding and/or modifying surface roughness, the bolt-on module includes a means for changing the application pressure of the treatment tool. The means for controlling the pressure could be in the form of software. Again, the application pressure can be controllably changed as a function of time and/or location of the treatment tool on the surface being treated. Another upgrade may consist of the module providing software or other instructions to the machine to controllably vary the velocity of translation or rotation of the treatment tool.
Aspects of the present invention will now be described with reference to the following examples.
This Example shows how a treatment tool of the present invention can be used to clean debris off of the support surface of a wafer chuck using only X and Y orthogonal motions of the treatment tool.
The wafer chuck supporting surface was then treated with the 6-axis machine of the present invention using a working head containing a treatment tool described above, and operated under the cleaning conditions described above. However, only 2 of the 6 axes of the machine were used, namely, motions in a Cartesian coordinate system: X and Y directions at right angles to one another.
The results of this cleaning treatment are shown in
Thus, the treatment tool of the present invention has been used successfully to clean debris off of the support surface of a wafer chuck using only motions of the tool in orthogonal X and Y-directions. Thus, prior art machines having X and Y-motion capabilities could be retrofitted with the treatment tool of the present invention to conduct similar cleaning/decontamination.
In addition, prior art R-theta machines likewise could be retrofitted with the working head of
This Example shows one use for the “dither” feature of the working head, and is made with reference to
A “toroidal” shaped treatment tool (
Slice 2 showed the greatest amount of material removed from the chuck surface, as evidenced both by the darkest wear path in the interference map, as well as by the deepest trace of the three slices in the surface elevation plots of
A single working head or treatment tool can grind, impart roughness, and remove contamination such as grinding debris from a surface to be treated. This is so because a light pressure will remove the contamination but will not modify the profile or alter the roughness of the surface. Higher pressures result in removal of substrate material from the surface being treated, not just contamination.
If the working head or treatment tool is sufficiently small in effective diameter it can be used to treat surfaces at different elevations. This is useful because in a wafer chuck having a seal ring, and pins, the seal ring is at a lower elevation than are the pin tops. A sufficiently small tool will fit within the width of the seal groove. Before treating the seal groove, however, the tool can be used to process the pin tops, for example, to correct flatness and to impart the required degree of roughness. This would be performed at relatively high application pressures. If this treatment is conducted deterministically and if the elevation map produced by the interferometer does not show too much area requiring grinding or lapping, the small diameter tool will be adequate to the task without taking too long to treat the area(s). After the tool finishes the grinding/lapping treatment, it can then be moved into the seal groove, and move circumferentially along the seal ring groove. At light application pressures, it will remove contamination but not remove substrate material, which would create additional contamination.
The “theta” and “phi” rotational axes of the instant machine typically are separate, distinct axes. As such, the treatment tool can be positioned over the center of the work piece, permitting this region of the work piece to be processed. In contrast, the treatment tool of the R-theta two degrees-of-freedom machine of the prior art cannot process this central region.
An artisan of ordinary skill will appreciate that various modifications may be made to the invention herein described without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/689,892, filed Nov. 20, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/789,943, filed Oct. 20, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,702,968, which is a Continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2016/046439, filed on Aug. 11, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/205,648, filed on Aug. 14, 2015. The entire contents of the applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2926653 | Krafft | Mar 1960 | A |
3500588 | Fischer | Mar 1970 | A |
3623273 | Busniak | Nov 1971 | A |
4128968 | Jones | Dec 1978 | A |
4610111 | Cox | Sep 1986 | A |
4956544 | Sayward | Sep 1990 | A |
5478271 | Thibaut | Dec 1995 | A |
5643053 | Shendon | Jul 1997 | A |
5791976 | Honda | Aug 1998 | A |
5934979 | Talieh | Aug 1999 | A |
5969972 | Kerszykowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6179695 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
7104342 | Berg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
9446494 | Becker et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
11623319 | Gratrix | Apr 2023 | B2 |
20010019934 | Nishimura | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020160696 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030092261 | Kondo et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20070287363 | Lange | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080125014 | Rosch et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090042488 | Sekiya et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100214549 | Cadee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120289126 | Tanikella et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130052812 | Nakata et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140011435 | Kaneko | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140106647 | Kang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140183163 | Sugiya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140335767 | Suratwala et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150258657 | Su et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150266155 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160276203 | Gratrix | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170120413 | McLain et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H07171747 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2008124292 | May 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
“Intemational Search Report and Written Opinion in Counterpart PCT Appl. PCT/US2016/046439, dated Jan. 17, 2017”. |
“Notice of Refusal in counterpart JP Appl. 2018-507626, dated Sep. 23, 2020”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230211453 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62205648 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16689892 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 18183404 | US | |
Parent | 15789943 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16689892 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2016/046439 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Child | 15789943 | US |