Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8173957
  • Patent Number
    8,173,957
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 26, 2010
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 8, 2012
    13 years ago
Abstract
The methods described herein generally relate to characterization of large analytes, such as biomolecules, by molecular mass analysis. Specifically, the methods are directed to molecular mass analysis of singly- or multiply-charged ions by selective ion filtering carried out by a digital thresholding process.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the field of detection and characterization of large analytes, such as biomolecules, by molecular mass analysis.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Mass spectrometry has been used for many decades in the characterization of small organic molecules. The technique typically involves the ionization of molecules in the sample to form molecular ions by subjecting the sample to an electron beam at a very low pressure. The molecular ions are then focused and accelerated by an electric field into a magnetic field or quadrupole. The ions are separated in the magnetic field or quadrupole according to the ratio of the mass of the ion m to the charge on the ion z (m/z). After passing through the field, the ions impinge upon a detector which determines the intensity of the ion beam and the m/z ratio, and these data are used to create the mass spectrum of the sample.


With the increasing interest in larger molecules, especially biomolecules such as nucleic acids and proteins, new techniques in the field of mass spectrometry are continually being developed to characterize these molecules.


In recent years the performance of commercially available mass spectrometers has seen significant improvement due, in part, to the availability of improved core components including more stable power supplies, faster digitizers, and more sophisticated fabrication methods for ion optic elements. Particularly noteworthy are the newest generation ESI-TOF mass spectrometers which, from several vendors in a variety of configurations, are now routinely yielding the types of mass measurement accuracy and mass resolution previously attainable only on high end sector or Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR)-based platforms. As such, the use of such bench top instruments by the bioanalytical community continues to expand as these instruments are increasingly being made available to scientists and technicians with a broad range of analytical needs. Accordingly, a number of increasingly sophisticated automation schemes are emerging, many incorporating some form of liquid chromatography (LC) as an on-line sample purification step to support high throughput QC or drug screening activities. While there are a number of applications in which some form of LC is a requisite step that facilitates the analysis of very complex mixtures, it is also used frequently as a generic desalting/purification protocol to prepare relatively pure analyte fractions for MS analysis.


Low molecular weight chemical noise is often the limiting factor in overall MS performance as the presence of high levels of low molecular weight components, such as polymers and buffer constituents, can drastically limit the spectral dynamic range and adversely affect mass accuracy. While LC is often used to reduce the adverse affects of such backgrounds, constraints on sample throughput and issues associated with solvent usage/disposal must be considered as part of the laboratory work flow. Additionally, LC is often used as a purification step (as opposed to a separation step) to render analytes amenable to MS analysis. Consequently, there is an increasing need for simple methods to reduce the chemical noise floor and render less than “pristine” samples amenable to mass spectrometric analysis.


The present invention satisfies this need, as well as others, by providing systems and methods for digital filtration of mass spectral signals arising from singly-charged low molecular weight components such as solution additives and matrix modifiers without significantly altering the mass spectral signals of larger analytes such as biomolecules.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to methods of identifying a multiply-charged ion. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a digital threshold filter which is in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be set at the digital threshold filter and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, the digital threshold filter independently outputs a digital signal to a data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing step of the method is then effected by specifying a digital signal threshold such that, upon a mass spectrometer measurement of the multiply-charged ion, the filtered digital signal output to the data file originates from the detection of the multiply-charged ion and excludes digital signal output from analog signals arising from singly-charged ions.


The present invention is also directed to methods for determining the molecular mass of a plurality of analytes in a mixture. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters, each in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be independently set at any of the plurality of digital threshold filters, each of which is in digital data communication with the digitizer and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputs a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing steps of the method are then effected by specifying a unique digital signal threshold at some members of the plurality of digital threshold filters, making a mass spectrometer measurement of the mixture, wherein each unique digital signal threshold differentially filters digital signals arising from the plurality of analytes and produces a unique digital signal output to each corresponding data file. The measurement results in storage of a plurality of data files. In the final step, each of the plurality of data files is analyzed and the molecular mass of at least one member of the plurality of analytes is contained in each of the plurality of data files.


The present invention is also directed to methods for calibrating a mass spectrum of an analyte. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters, each in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be independently set at any of the plurality of digital threshold filters, each of which is in digital data communication with the digitizer and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputs a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing steps of the method are then effected by specifying a first unique digital signal threshold at one digital threshold filter such that digital signal output to a first data file has signals from both the analyte and a calibrant ion and then specifying a second unique digital signal threshold at another digital threshold filter such that the digital signal output to a second data file has signals from the analyte but not the calibrant. The second data file is subtracted from the first data file to obtain a calibration file which is then used to calibrate the mass spectrum.


The present invention is also directed to a system comprised of a mass spectrometer that comprises the following components: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold which are each in digital data communication with the digitizer and in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The system has a plurality of data files and a plurality of parallel digital signal output transferring means, each of which is in digital data communication with one of the plurality of digital threshold filters and a corresponding data file from the plurality of data files.





BRIEF DISCUSSION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the detector response intensity as a function of digital signal threshold value (in this case indicated by cutoff voltage) of analyte ions having similar m/z ratios but differing in molecular weights. Circles: 140-mer oligonucleotide (m/z=1232.9), squares: 70-mer oligonucleotide (m/z=1199), diamonds: 38-mer oligonucleotide (m/z=1174.7), crosses: 12-mer oligonucleotide (m/z=1233) and triangles: polypropylene glycol (PPG−m/z=1236).



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the effects of specifying digital signal thresholds on mass spectra. FIG. 2a depicts the raw digitizer (ADC, analog digital converter) output from a theoretical single scan containing a singly-charged ion (ion1) which strikes the detector at T1 and a large multiply-charged ion (ion2) which strikes the detector at T2. FIGS. 2b and 2c indicate a spectrum with a high and low digital signal threshold respectively. FIG. 2d indicates a spectrum without a digital signal threshold and detector “white noise” is visible in the spectrum.



FIG. 3 displays mass spectra of a PCR product. FIG. 3a is an ESI-TOF mass spectra of a 140-mer PCR product acquired at a normal (3 mV) digital threshold setting. The sample contains a contaminating amount of polypropylene glycol (PPG) relatively high levels of singly charged peptides (which serve as internal mass standards). Peaks labeled with “x” indicate signals from the PPG and “c” represents signals from the peptide mass standards. FIG. 3b is an ESI-TOF spectrum of the same sample of PCR product obtained at a digital threshold setting of 15 mV. Contaminants and mass standards have been filtered out of the spectrum.



FIG. 4 is an expanded region of the ESI-TOF spectra from FIG. 3 in which the relatively low abundance high charge states of the PCR amplicon are detected. The effective signal to noise of the spectrum in FIG. 4a is defined by the signal to chemical noise ratio, while the effective signal to noise of the spectrum in FIG. 4b is defined by the signal to electronic noise ratio.



FIG. 5 exhibits ESI-TOF spectra of a solution containing approximately 0.5 nM PCR product in the presence of 500 nM PPG was characterized at low (FIG. 5a) and high (FIG. 5b) threshold settings As shown in the inset, the top spectrum is also inundated with other chemical noise components and the peak-at-every-mass background precludes the detection of the low level PCR products. When the digital signal threshold is set such that signals from singly charged species are not detected, a distinct signature for the low level amplicon is detected.



FIG. 6 indicates two overlapping peaks of a 140-mer oligonucleotide and of a 12-mer oligonucleotide which can be resolved through acquisition of data with different digital signal thresholds. The top spectrum was obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 7 mV. The middle spectrum was obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 11 mV. The bottom spectrum was obtained by subtraction of the middle spectrum from the top spectrum to obtain a clean isotopically resolved spectrum of the 12-mer oligonucleotide.



FIG. 7 shows the typical digitizer configuration (FIG. 7a) with a single threshold setting compared to a digitizer which allows multiple threshold settings to be applied simultaneously to data stream coming from the TOF digitizer (FIG. 7b).



FIG. 8 shows mass spectra of carbonic anhydrase in the presence of 0.001% SDS and P/I buffer. The protein-derived signals of the spectrum obtained with a 1 mV digital signal threshold setting (FIG. 8a) are subject to considerable interference from the detergent and buffer components. In contrast, FIG. 8b indicates that the interfering components are rendered “invisible” by specifying a digital threshold setting of 11 mV.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

In some embodiments of the present invention, the mass spectrometer system comprises the following components: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold which are each in digital data communication with the digitizer and in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. In some embodiments, the analog and digital signals are voltage signals and the analog to digital converter (ADC) converts the analog voltage signal to a digital voltage signal. In some embodiments, a plurality of mass spectrometer measurements are made and the resulting plurality of data files are co-added.


In other embodiments, the mass spectrometer system comprises a (iv) single digital threshold filter instead of a plurality of digital threshold filters. The single digital threshold filter is in digital data communication with the digitizer and a corresponding data file.


In some embodiments, the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. In some embodiments, ions are produced by electrospray ionization (ESI).


In some embodiments, the multiply-charged analyte is a biomolecule such as, for example, a nucleic acid, a protein, a carbohydrate or a lipid. Examples of nucleic acids include, but are not limited to, RNA constructs used to screen small molecules for drug discovery and amplification products such as PCR products which can be used for genetic analyses. In some embodiments, the multiply-charged analyte is of a molecular weight of 5-500 kDa, 25-250 kDa, or 50-100 kDa.


In some embodiments, the method allows for ESI-TOF characterization of biomolecules in the presence of biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers used in online separation techniques. Stabilizing agents include, but are not limited to, buffer salts such as phosphates for example, ampholytes, glycerol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, reducing agents, detergents, and the like. Matrix modifiers may be any type of additive used to effect a solution matrix property advantageous to an analytical separation and may include, but are not limited to, ampholytes, detergents and buffer salts such as phosphates for example.


In some embodiments, the biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers are singly-charged when detected by the mass spectrometer. In other embodiments, the biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers have one or two charges.


In some embodiments, when a plurality of digital signal threshold filters are employed in the mass spectrometer system, a plurality of unique digital signal thresholds are specified in order to obtain parallel differentially filtered data streams which are stored in corresponding data files. In some embodiments, any member of the data files may be subtracted from any of the other data files to obtain a more accurate representation of a given analyte signal. These embodiments may be used to obtain a more accurate mass spectrum of a calibrant ion, or any other lower molecular weight contaminating ion by subtracting out an overlapping signal from an ion having a similar m/z but with a larger molecular mass.


In some embodiments, the methods described herein which employ multiple differentially thresholded data streams may be used in multiplexed data acquisition of a plurality of ions such as those obtained from chemical, protease or restriction digestion of proteins or nucleic acids.


In some embodiments, the methods described herein may be used to reduce the burden of level of purification of large molecular weight or multiply charged analytes such as biomolecules, for example, from stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers.


EXAMPLES
Example 1
ESI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Conditions

A Bruker Daltonics (Billerica, Mass.) MicroTOF ESI time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer was used in this work. Ions from the ESI source undergo orthogonal ion extraction and are focused in a reflectron prior to detection. Ions are formed in the standard MicroTOF ESI source which is equipped with an off-axis sprayer and glass capillary. For operation in the negative ion mode, the atmospheric pressure end of the glass capillary is biased at 6000 V relative to the ESI needle during data acquisition. A counter-current flow of dry N2 is employed to assist in the desolvation process. External ion accumulation is employed to improve ionization duty cycle during data acquisition. Each ESI-TOF spectrum is comprised of 75,000 data points digitized over 75 μs. All aspects of data acquisition were controlled by the Bruker MicroTOF software package. Post processing of data was also performed using the standard Bruker software.


Example 2
PCR Conditions and Purification of Amplification Products

All PCR reactions were assembled in 50 μL reaction volumes in a 96 well microtiter plate format using a Packard MPII liquid handling robotic platform and M.J. Dyad thermocyclers (MJ research, Waltham, Mass.). The PCR reaction mix consists of 4 units of Amplitaq Gold, 1× buffer II (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4M betaine, 800 μM dNTP mix and 250 nM of primer. The following PCR conditions were used: 95° C. for 10 min followed by 50 cycles of 95° C. for 30 sec, 50° C. for 30 sec, and 72° C. for 30 sec.


PCR products were purified using the protocols disclosed and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/943,344 which is commonly owned and incorporated herein by reference in entirety.


Example 3
Investigation of Detection Efficiency of Large Oligonucleotide Ions

In an attempt to optimize detection efficiency of large oligonucleotide ions, and to better understand the relationship between ion arrival statistics and mass accuracy, a detailed systematic study was designed to investigate detector response as a function of molecular weight, m/z, and charge state at the individual ion level.


In time of flight mass spectrometry ions are separated based on differences in their velocity as they traverse the flight tube. As ions strike the detector, their arrival times are recorded and subsequently converted to m/z based on the specific configuration of the spectrometer (length of flight path, accelerating voltage, geometry, etc.). It is generally accepted that for singly charged species, detector response is inversely proportional to molecular weight (velocity) and, for example in the case of MALDI, higher molecular weight species induce a smaller detection signal than lower molecular weight species. It was suspected that lower charge states (i.e. lower velocity species) induce a smaller signal than do the higher charge states (i.e. high velocity species) under the same accelerating voltages. The reduced response of high molecular weight “slow” ions can be partially ameliorated by the use of post-acceleration methods in which ions are accelerated to very high kinetic energies immediately prior to detection.


During the course of this investigation, it became immediately apparent that ions of the same nominal m/z but different molecular weights induced significantly different detector responses. The heavier, more highly charged ions consistently produced detector responses several times that of their singly charged counterparts at the same m/z. Thus, while in the TOF mass analyzer ions of the same m/z have the same velocity, ions of different molecular weigh do not have the same momentum or kinetic energy and do not induce the same signal on the detector.


This phenomenon is readily illustrated by examining spectral response as a function of the digital threshold employed to acquire mass spectra of species covering a range of molecular weights.


Unlike MALDI of large biomolecules, the multiple charging phenomenon inherent to the ESI process generally produces mass spectra in which the majority of the signals are in the same m/z range. Molecular ions from moderate to large biomolecules (1 kDa to 100 kDa) are generally detected in the 500-2000 m/z range and it is thus not at all uncommon for complex mixtures to yield spectra in which peaks of many different masses are detected at the same m/z. To characterize detector response as a function of molecular weight (charge), solutions containing analytes with molecular weight ratios of 1.0, 3.7, 11.8, 21.5, and 43 were analyzed at a range of digital thresholds. For each series, a single charge at or near m/z 1233 was used to gauge the detector response. The resulting molecular weight isopleths are plotted in FIG. 1. Importantly, at low digital signal thresholds set according to Example 4 (vide infra), the singly charged PPG ions drop in intensity at significantly lower cutoff voltages than do the higher molecular weight (charge) species. For example, at a digital signal threshold cutoff voltage of 9 mV, the signal of the PPG ions at m/z 1233 is attenuated to non-detectable levels while the 43 kDa PCR product at m/z 1233 is still detected at approximately 90% of the initial response. There is a definite trend in cutoff voltages as a function of molecular weight (charge state) suggesting that one can select a digital signal threshold to selectively detect (or not detect) species of interest.


Example 4
Digital Signal Threshold Rationale

Under the acquisition conditions routinely employed to characterize PCR products, individual scans are acquired and co-added at a rate of 75 kHz. Thus for a typical 45 second acquisition, each spectrum is comprised of 660,000 co-added individual scans. In order to reduce the shot/white noise in the co-added spectrum, the MicroTOF electronics allow one to set a digital filter threshold (voltage cutoff) such that white noise from the detector at the single or low-bit ADC count is zeroed out of each scan and only detector responses consistent with ion detection events are passed to the transient summing digitizer data system to be co-added. This concept is shown schematically in FIG. 2. FIG. 2a depicts the raw ADC output from a theoretical single scan in which a singly charged ion (ion1) strikes the detector at T1 and a large multiply charged ion (ion2) which strikes the detector at time T2. During the time intervals in which neither ion1 nor ion2 are striking the detector the ADC is picking up and digitizing detector noise generally corresponding to 1-5 bits. Because of the fast acquisition rate of the TOF and the finite ion capacity of the source, each scan is typically comprised of relatively few ion detection events and for any given ion channel, it is very unlikely that an ion will be detected in each scan. Thus, co-adding large numbers of unfiltered scans such as those depicted in FIG. 2d would result in a noise floor that increases linearly with the number of scans and a mass spectrum in which the ultimate dynamic range would be limited by the relatively high electronic noise floor.


To minimize the deleterious effects of co-adding low-bit detector noise, the MicroTOF electronics allow the user to set a cutoff voltage that has the net effect of zeroing-out low level signals that are attributed only to detector noise. As illustrated in FIG. 2c, this approach, ideally, does not affect the ADC counts for signals consistent with a singly charged ion but digitally filters each scan prior to co-adding, such that detector white noise is not co-added with the same efficiency as detector ion response. As illustrated in FIG. 2b, this concept can be taken a step further by setting the digital filter threshold such that ADC counts derived from detector noise and singly charged ions striking the detector are zeroed out prior to co-adding. Thus, with the digital threshold set at the level depicted in FIG. 2b, a singly charged ion striking the detector is “invisible” in the post-filtered ADC output and the net result is a “high pass” molecular weight (charge) filter in which low molecular weight (charge) species are not detected but high molecular weight (charge) species, which tend to be multiply-charged are still detected.


Example 5
Chemical Noise Removal by High Pass Digital Threshold Filtering

A key challenge in the analysis of large biopolymers by ESI-MS is sample purification. Low molecular weight contaminants in biopolymer solutions can have deleterious effects on the quality of ESI-MS spectra and can significantly limit the dynamic range and accuracy of the measurement. In some cases these low molecular weight “contaminants” are actually required additives as components of an on-line separations. Such additives include ampholytes used in capillary isoelectric focusing, phosphates commonly used as components of buffers used in capillary zone electrophoresis, and solution matrix modifiers used to promote micelle formation in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Similarly, electrospray incompatible additives such as glycerol and polymers (polyethelene glycol, PPG) are often used to stabilize enzymes to be used in biochemical processes. These compounds often make their way through an entire biochemical process and end up in the mass spectrometer. A key example of the latter type of “contaminant” is the presence of high levels of polyethelene glycol and polypropylene glycol polymers in the Taq polymerase used for PCR. While typically only 1-2 μL of Taq are used in each 50 μL PCR reaction, the relatively high concentration of polymer in the presence of the relatively low concentration of PCR products (typically 10-100 nM), coupled with the fact that such polymers are ionized with high efficiency, may cause a significant chemical noise suppression issue.



FIG. 3
a illustrates an example of an ESI-TOF spectrum of a 140-mer PCR product into which a contaminating amount of PPG was spiked along with relatively high levels of singly charged peptides (which serve as internal mass standards). The signal from the charge state envelope of the multiply charged strands of the PCR amplicons is confounded by the presence of the intense signal arising from the low molecular weight species. This spectrum was acquired using a “normal” digital threshold setting in which the detector white noise output from the digitizer is filtered out but the threshold is set low enough to ensure that signals from singly charged ions are captured. This spectrum is exemplary of a common situation in which a large biopolymer is analyzed in the presence of a significant chemical noise background arising from low molecular weight contaminants. As shown, such interferences can adversely affect the mass accuracy of the measurement and result in reduced spectral dynamic range.


In contrast, the ESI-TOF spectrum in FIG. 3b was acquired on the same spectrometer from the identical solution using the identical ESI source parameters and acquisitions conditions with the important exception that the spectrum in FIG. 3b was acquired at a cutoff voltage of 15 mV while the spectrum in 3a was acquired moments earlier at a cutoff voltage of 3 mV. It is clear from these spectra, and the data presented in FIG. 2 that the 15 mV cutoff setting precludes the detection of the singly charged species in the solution yet facilitates the detection of the larger, more highly charged PCR amplicons. It is evident from the spectra in FIG. 3 and the cutoff profiles in FIG. 2 that the intensity of the amplicon peaks are reduced by about 30%; importantly the peaks from the singly charged polymer and calibrants are not present in the spectrum acquired at the higher cutoff voltage and the spectrum in FIG. 3b has significantly improved signal-to-chemical noise characteristics. It is worthwhile to emphasize that, no other instrument, solution, or data processing parameters were changed between collecting the spectra in FIGS. 3a and 3b, the only difference was the digital signal threshold setting.


Indicating the applicability of the method for biomolecules other than nucleic acids, FIG. 8 shows mass spectra of carbonic anhydrase in the presence of 0.001% SDS and 25 mM Piperidine/Imidizole buffer. The protein-derived signals of the spectrum obtained with a 1 mV digital signal threshold setting are subject to considerable interference from the detergent and buffer components. In contrast, FIG. 8b indicates that the interfering components are rendered “invisible” by specifying a digital threshold setting of 11 mV.


These data indicate that in some high throughput screening and QC applications a less rigorous sample purification protocol might be employed and chemical noise can be removed via the digital filtering approach described above. Importantly, this approach allows ESI-MS analysis of large biomolecules (or noncovalent complexes) from solutions which might otherwise contain too much chemical noise to produce interpretable spectra.


Example 6
Dynamic Range Enhancement by Digital Threshold Filtering

By reducing or eliminating the chemical noise floor in addition to reducing the electronic noise floor, significant improvements in dynamic range and spectral quality are attainable. This concept is demonstrated in FIGS. 4 and 5. Shown in FIG. 4 is an expanded region of the ESI-TOF spectra from FIG. 3 in which the relatively low abundance high charge states of the PCR amplicon are detected. Note that the signals from the (M-43H+)43−, (M-42H+)42−, and (M-41H+)41− charge states are barely visible in the unfiltered spectrum (FIG. 4a) but clearly visible in the filtered spectrum (FIG. 4b). The effective signal to noise of the spectrum in FIG. 4a is defined by the signal to chemical noise ratio, while the effective signal to noise of the spectrum in FIG. 4b is defined by the signal to electronic noise ratio. For example, for the (M-41H+)41− charge state of the amplicon the signal to (chemical) noise in the spectrum acquired at the low cutoff threshold is approximately 2 while the signal to (electronic) noise of the spectrum acquired at the higher cutoff threshold is approximately 12. Additionally, signals from charge states (M-40H+)40− and (M-39H+)39− are not readily discernable from the chemical noise in FIG. 4a but clearly visible in FIG. 4b.


The improvement in effective dynamic range afforded by the present invention is further illustrated in FIG. 5 in which a solution containing approximately 0.5 nM PCR product in the presence of 500 nM PPG was characterized at high and low threshold settings. At the normal threshold setting the spectrum is dominated by highly abundant singly charged polymer ions and the very low level PCR products are not observed. As shown in the inset, the top spectrum is also inundated with other chemical noise components and the peak-at-every-mass background precludes the detection of the low level PCR products. When the digital signal threshold is set such that signals from singly charged species are not detected, a distinct signature for the low level amplicon is detected. This attribute has the potential to significantly improve the detection of low concentration biomolecules in solution as it is frequently the presence of low level, ubiquitous, contaminants introduced from buffer impurities, plasticware, and sample handling that define the chemical noise floor of the mass spectra and limit the applicability of ESI-MS to complex biological systems.


In addition to reducing the useful dynamic range of a mass spectrum, chemical noise and low molecular weight contaminants can have adverse affects on accurate mass measurements. As described above, ESI-MS spectra often have overlapping peaks that result from species of different molecular weights but the same m/z. This is particularly problematic for large biopolymer ions which generally produce somewhat congested spectra in which multiple charge states are observed in the 500 to 2000 m/z range. Because low molecular weight species are isotopically resolved and species above about 10 kDa are generally not, it is quite common to see a low molecular weight contaminant peak overlap with and distort an otherwise analytically useful analyte peak. An example of this is shown in FIG. 6 in which the signal from the (M-3H+)3− charge state of a 12-mer oligonucleotide is observed at the same m/z as the (M-35H+)35− charge state of a much larger 140-mer PCR product. In this case the smaller oligonucleotide is intended to serve as an internal mass standard but, as is illustrated in FIG. 6 and in the mass accuracy data in Table 1, the co-location of these signals is deleterious to both signals. First, at the 7 mV threshold it is not immediately apparent that there are two species at m/z 1233 as peaks from the isotopically resolved 12-mer mask the presence of the larger unresolved amplicon peak. Additionally, the presence of the unresolved amplicon peak distorts the peak shapes and centroids of the isotopically resolved 12-mer peaks such that the mass accuracy is compromised. When the digital threshold is set to 11 mV, the contribution to the peak from the triply charged 12-mer is substantially reduced and the presence of a high molecular weight unresolved peak is apparent. Importantly, because the aggregate signal (i.e. 12-mer and 140-mer) is captured at the 7 mV digital threshold level, and the contribution to the signal from the 140-mer can be measured at a higher digital threshold level (11 mV in this example), the signal from the 12-mer can be derived by subtracting the spectrum acquired at 11 mV from the spectrum acquired at 7 mV. The resulting spectrum exhibits a notably improved distribution (containing 5 peaks) and, perhaps more importantly, the centroided peaks yield a reduced mass measurement error across the distribution. In this example, the average mass measurement error for the five peaks was reduced from 5.9 to 1.5 ppm following the spectral subtraction.









TABLE 1







Calculated Error in m/z Measurements for 7 mV Digital Signal Threshold


vs. (7 mV) − (11 mV) Digital Signal Thresholds











Digital Signal
Peak
Theoretical
Measured



Threshold (mV)
Number
(m/z)
(m/z)
Error (ppm)














7
1
1232.5408
1232.5596
−15.2512


7 − 11
1
1232.5408
1232.5449
−3.3246


7
2
1232.8752
1232.8809
−4.6266


7 − 11
2
1232.8752
1232.8753
−0.0844


7
3
1233.2095
1233.2005
7.2811


7 − 11
3
1233.2095
1233.2071
1.9292


7
4
1233.5437
1233.5452
−1.1898


7 − 11
4
1233.5437
1233.5428
0.7558


7
5
1233.8780
1233.8764
1.2781


7 − 11
5
1233.8780
1233.8799
−1.5585









In Table 1, 7-11 indicates that a spectrum obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 11 mV was subtracted from a spectrum obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 7 mV.


Example 7
Spectral Subtraction and Ion Partitioning: Obtaining “Slices of Ions”

In accordance with the present invention, the experiments illustrated in FIGS. 3-5 illustrate that the digital thresholding method described above allows for the detection of large multiple charged biomolecular ions in such a manner so as to render low molecular weight species “invisible” (based on digital thresholding) while the data presented in FIG. 6 illustrates a method by which low molecular weight species can be analyzed in such a manner so as to make large multiple charged biomolecular ions “invisible” (by digital thresholding and spectral subtraction). The results from the relatively simple subtraction described in Example 6 lay the foundation for more sophisticated digital thresholding schemes in which multiple “slices” of a complex ion population can be analyzed simultaneously with the effective result being a multidimensional detection configuration in which ions are simultaneously measured.


In this work all of the high threshold/low threshold comparisons were made by multiple measurements of the same analyte solution acquired under identical instrument conditions except the digital threshold was varied. This was done out of necessity because, as illustrated in FIG. 7a, the basic system architecture of the Bruker MicroTOF consists of a single data stream from the detector to the digitizer for which a single threshold level is applied to the data stream prior to co-adding of scans. As sample throughput is a key driver in many laboratories, requiring each sample to be analyzed two (or more) times at different digital thresholds may not be feasible.


In accordance with the present invention and as a means of circumventing this problem, the alternative digitization scheme illustrated in FIG. 7b indicates that output from the ADC can be split to multiple parallel data streams, each of which is subjected to a different digital threshold. By subtracting spectra acquired at different digital thresholds, one could obtain a mass spectrum for any “slice” of the ion population. This would allow one to perform digital thresholding on a very complex mass spectrum and evaluate a range of molecular weights (charges) independent of other, potentially interfering, ion populations such as for example, a restriction digest of a nucleic acid or a protease digest of a protein. Another example could be a biomolecule such as a nucleic acid or a protein having a non-convalently-bound small molecule.


Having multiple variably-thresholded mass spectra derived from the identical digitization event would guarantee perfect subtraction of spectral features and would eliminate potential artifacts which may arise from spectral drift over the course of acquiring multiple spectra. Importantly, this also means that one could introduce low molecular weight internal mass standards (calibrants) to very accurately calibrate the m/z axis (e.g. the PPG series in FIG. 3a) but derive accurate mass measurements of biomolecular analytes from peaks that are never “stepped on” by low molecular weight species (e.g. the digitally thresholded spectrum in FIG. 3b).


Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Each reference (including, but not limited to, journal articles, U.S. and non-U.S. patents, patent application publications, international patent application publications, gene bank accession numbers, and the like) cited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Claims
  • 1. A method of identifying a multiply-charged ion comprising: a) specifying a digital signal threshold on a mass spectrometer, wherein the mass spectrometer comprises: i) an ion detector;ii) a digitizer for converting an analog signal to a digital signal;iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer; andiv) a digital threshold filter, for setting a digital signal threshold, in digital data communication with the digitizer, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputting a digital signal to a data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold;
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising making a plurality of mass spectrometer measurements according to step a) and co-adding the resulting plurality of data files.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the multiply-charged ion is a biomolecule.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the biomolecule is a nucleic acid, peptide, protein, lipid, or carbohydrate.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the biomolecule comprises a non-covalently-bound small molecule.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the singly-charged ions are biomolecule stabilizer additives or matrix modifiers.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the stabilizer additives are one or more of: polyethylene glycol, glycerol, reducing agents, detergents or buffer salts, or any combination thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the matrix-modifying additives are one or more of: ampholytes, detergents, or buffer salts, or any combination thereof.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the analog signal is an analog voltage signal and the digital signal is a digital voltage signal.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer, or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.
  • 11. A method for determining the molecular mass of a plurality of analytes in a mixture comprising: a) specifying a unique digital signal threshold for at least some members of a plurality of digital threshold filters on a mass spectrometer, wherein the mass spectrometer comprises: i) an ion detector;ii) a digitizer for converting an analog signal to a digital signal;iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer; andiv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold in digital data communication with the digitizer, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold;b) making a mass spectrometer measurement of the mixture, wherein each unique digital signal threshold differentially filters digital signals arising from the plurality of analytes and produces a unique digital signal output to each corresponding data file wherein the measurement results in storage of a plurality of data files; andc) analyzing each member of the plurality of data files wherein the molecular mass of at least one member of the plurality of analytes is contained therein.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising making a plurality of mass spectrometer measurements according to step b) and co-adding the resulting plurality of data files obtained from the plurality of mass spectrometer measurements.
  • 13. The method of claim 11 wherein the analysis of step c) comprises mathematical subtraction of at least one member of the plurality of data files from at least one other member of the plurality of data files.
  • 14. The method of claim 11 wherein the plurality of analytes comprise singly-charged ions and multiply-charged ions.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the multiply-charged ions are biomolecules.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein the biomolecules comprise non-covalently-bound small molecules.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 wherein the biomolecules are nucleic acids, peptides, proteins, lipids or carbohydrates.
  • 18. The method of claim 14 wherein the singly-charged ions are biomolecule stabilizer additives or matrix modifiers.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the stabilizer additives are one or more of: polyethylene glycol, glycerol, reducing agents, detergents, or buffer salts, or any combination thereof.
  • 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the matrix-modifying additives are one or more of: ampholytes, detergents, or buffer salts, or any combination thereof.
  • 21. The method of claim 11 wherein the analog signal is an analog voltage signal and the digital signal is a digital voltage signal.
  • 22. The method of claim 11 wherein the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer, or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.
  • 23. A method of calibrating a mass spectrum of an analyte comprising: a) specifying a first digital signal threshold at a first member of a plurality of digital threshold filters, on a mass spectrometer, wherein the mass spectrometer comprises: i) an ion detector;ii) a digitizer for converting an analog signal to a digital signal;iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer; andiv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold, in digital data communication with the digitizer, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only ifthe digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold;
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the calibrant ion is a nucleic acid, peptide or small molecule.
  • 25. The method of claim 23 wherein the analyte is a biomolecule.
  • 26. The method of claim 25 wherein the biomolecule is a nucleic acid, peptide, protein, lipid or carbohydrate.
  • 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the biomolecule comprises a non-covalently-bound small molecule.
  • 28. The method of claim 23 wherein the analog signal is an analog voltage signal and the digital signal is a digital voltage signal.
  • 29. The method of claim 23 wherein the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer, or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.
  • 30. A system comprising a mass spectrometer comprising: an ion detector;a digitizer for converting an analog signal to a digital signal;an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer;a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a plurality of independent digital signal thresholds, each digital threshold filter in parallel electronic communication with the digitizer, each digital threshold filter in response to a digital voltage input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital voltage only if the digital voltage input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold;a plurality of data files; anda plurality of parallel digital signal output transferring means, each of which is in digital data communication with one of the digital threshold filters and a corresponding data file from the plurality of data files.
  • 31. The system of claim 30 wherein the analog signal is an analog voltage signal and the digital signal is a digital voltage signal.
  • 32. The system of claim 30 wherein the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer, or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/574,042 filed May 24, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (351)
Number Name Date Kind
4075475 Risby et al. Feb 1978 A
4683195 Mullis et al. Jul 1987 A
4683202 Mullis Jul 1987 A
4965188 Mullis et al. Oct 1990 A
5015845 Allen et al. May 1991 A
5072115 Zhou Dec 1991 A
5143905 Sivasubramanian et al. Sep 1992 A
5213961 Bunn et al. May 1993 A
5219727 Wang et al. Jun 1993 A
5288611 Kohne Feb 1994 A
5436129 Stapleton Jul 1995 A
5451500 Stapleton Sep 1995 A
5472843 Milliman Dec 1995 A
5476774 Wang et al. Dec 1995 A
5484908 Froehler et al. Jan 1996 A
5502177 Matteucci et al. Mar 1996 A
5503980 Cantor Apr 1996 A
5504327 Sproch et al. Apr 1996 A
5504329 Mann et al. Apr 1996 A
5523217 Lupski et al. Jun 1996 A
5527669 Resnick et al. Jun 1996 A
5527675 Coull et al. Jun 1996 A
5547835 Koster Aug 1996 A
5567587 Kohne Oct 1996 A
5576204 Blanco et al. Nov 1996 A
5580733 Levis et al. Dec 1996 A
5605798 Koster Feb 1997 A
5608217 Franzen et al. Mar 1997 A
5612179 Simons Mar 1997 A
5622824 Koster Apr 1997 A
5625184 Vestal et al. Apr 1997 A
5639606 Willey Jun 1997 A
5641632 Kohne Jun 1997 A
5645985 Froehler et al. Jul 1997 A
5683869 Ramsay Shaw et al. Nov 1997 A
5686242 Bruice et al. Nov 1997 A
5691141 Koster Nov 1997 A
5700642 Monforte et al. Dec 1997 A
5702895 Matsunaga et al. Dec 1997 A
5707802 Sandhu et al. Jan 1998 A
5712125 Uhlen Jan 1998 A
5716825 Hancock et al. Feb 1998 A
5727202 Kucala Mar 1998 A
5745751 Nelson et al. Apr 1998 A
5747246 Pannetier et al. May 1998 A
5747251 Carson et al. May 1998 A
5753467 Jensen et al. May 1998 A
5753489 Kistner et al. May 1998 A
5759771 Tilanus Jun 1998 A
5763169 Sandhu et al. Jun 1998 A
5763588 Matteucci et al. Jun 1998 A
5770367 Southern et al. Jun 1998 A
5777324 Hillenkamp Jul 1998 A
5814442 Natarajan et al. Sep 1998 A
5822824 Dion Oct 1998 A
5828062 Jarrell et al. Oct 1998 A
5830653 Froehler et al. Nov 1998 A
5830655 Monforte et al. Nov 1998 A
5830853 Backstrom et al. Nov 1998 A
5832489 Kucala Nov 1998 A
5834255 Van Gemen et al. Nov 1998 A
5845174 Yasui et al. Dec 1998 A
5849492 Rogan Dec 1998 A
5849497 Steinman Dec 1998 A
5849901 Mabilat et al. Dec 1998 A
5851765 Koster Dec 1998 A
5856174 Lipshutz et al. Jan 1999 A
5864137 Becker et al. Jan 1999 A
5866429 Bloch Feb 1999 A
5869242 Kamb Feb 1999 A
5871697 Rothberg et al. Feb 1999 A
5872003 Koster Feb 1999 A
5876936 Ju Mar 1999 A
5876938 Stolowitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5885775 Haff et al. Mar 1999 A
5900481 Lough et al. May 1999 A
5928905 Stemmer et al. Jul 1999 A
5928906 Koster et al. Jul 1999 A
5965363 Monforte et al. Oct 1999 A
5965383 Vogel et al. Oct 1999 A
5972693 Rothberg et al. Oct 1999 A
5976798 Parker et al. Nov 1999 A
5981176 Wallace Nov 1999 A
5981190 Israel Nov 1999 A
5994066 Bergeron et al. Nov 1999 A
6001564 Bergeron et al. Dec 1999 A
6005096 Matteucci et al. Dec 1999 A
6007690 Nelson et al. Dec 1999 A
6007992 Lin et al. Dec 1999 A
6015666 Springer et al. Jan 2000 A
6018713 Coli et al. Jan 2000 A
6024925 Little et al. Feb 2000 A
6028183 Lin et al. Feb 2000 A
6043031 Koster et al. Mar 2000 A
6046005 Ju et al. Apr 2000 A
6051378 Monforte et al. Apr 2000 A
6054278 Dodge et al. Apr 2000 A
6055487 Margery et al. Apr 2000 A
6060246 Summerton et al. May 2000 A
6061686 Gauvin et al. May 2000 A
6063031 Cundari et al. May 2000 A
6074823 Koster Jun 2000 A
6074831 Yakhini et al. Jun 2000 A
6090558 Butler et al. Jul 2000 A
6104028 Hunter et al. Aug 2000 A
6110710 Smith et al. Aug 2000 A
6111251 Hillenkamp Aug 2000 A
6133436 Koster et al. Oct 2000 A
6140053 Koster Oct 2000 A
6146144 Fowler et al. Nov 2000 A
6146854 Koster et al. Nov 2000 A
6153389 Haarer et al. Nov 2000 A
6159681 Zebala Dec 2000 A
6180339 Sandhu et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180372 Franzen Jan 2001 B1
6187842 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194114 Toyoda et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194144 Koster Feb 2001 B1
6197498 Koster Mar 2001 B1
6214555 Leushner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218118 Sampson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221587 Ecker et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221598 Schumm et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221601 Koster et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221605 Koster Apr 2001 B1
6225450 Koster May 2001 B1
6235476 Bergmann et al. May 2001 B1
6235478 Koster May 2001 B1
6235480 Shultz et al. May 2001 B1
6238871 Koster May 2001 B1
6238927 Abrams et al. May 2001 B1
6239159 Brown et al. May 2001 B1
6258538 Koster et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261769 Everett et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265716 Hunter et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265718 Park et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266131 Hamada et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266144 Li Jul 2001 B1
6268129 Gut et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268131 Kang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268144 Koster Jul 2001 B1
6268146 Shultz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270973 Lewis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6270974 Shultz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274726 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277573 Koster Aug 2001 B1
6277578 Shultz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277634 McCall et al. Aug 2001 B1
6300076 Koster Oct 2001 B1
6303297 Lincoln et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312893 Van Ness et al. Nov 2001 B1
6312902 Shultz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322970 Little et al. Nov 2001 B1
6361940 Van Ness et al. Mar 2002 B1
6372424 Brow et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389428 Rigault et al. May 2002 B1
6391551 Shultz et al. May 2002 B1
6393367 Tang et al. May 2002 B1
6419932 Dale Jul 2002 B1
6423966 Hillenkamp et al. Jul 2002 B2
6428955 Koster et al. Aug 2002 B1
6428956 Crooke et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432651 Hughes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436635 Fu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436640 Simmons et al. Aug 2002 B1
6453244 Oefner Sep 2002 B1
6458533 Felder et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468743 Romick et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468748 Monforte et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475143 Iliff Nov 2002 B2
6475736 Stanton, Jr. Nov 2002 B1
6475738 Shuber et al. Nov 2002 B2
6479239 Anderson et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500621 Koster Dec 2002 B2
6553317 Lincoln et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558902 Hillenkamp May 2003 B1
6563025 Song et al. May 2003 B1
6566055 Monforte et al. May 2003 B1
6568055 Tang et al. May 2003 B1
6582916 Schmidt et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586584 McMillian et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589485 Koster Jul 2003 B2
6602662 Koster et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605433 Fliss et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610492 Stanton, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613509 Chen Sep 2003 B1
6613520 Ashby Sep 2003 B2
6623928 Van Ness et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638714 Linnen et al. Oct 2003 B1
6680476 Hidalgo et al. Jan 2004 B1
6682889 Wang et al. Jan 2004 B1
6705530 Kiekhaefer Mar 2004 B2
6706530 Hillenkamp Mar 2004 B2
6783939 Olmsted et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800289 Nagata et al. Oct 2004 B2
6813615 Colasanti et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836742 Brekenfeld Dec 2004 B2
6852487 Barany et al. Feb 2005 B1
6856914 Pelech Feb 2005 B1
6875593 Froehler et al. Apr 2005 B2
6906316 Sugiyama et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906319 Hoyes Jun 2005 B2
6914137 Baker Jul 2005 B2
6939367 Harrison Sep 2005 B2
6977148 Dean et al. Dec 2005 B2
6994962 Thilly Feb 2006 B1
7022835 Rauth et al. Apr 2006 B1
7024370 Epler et al. Apr 2006 B2
7108974 Ecker et al. Sep 2006 B2
7198893 Köster et al. Apr 2007 B1
7217510 Ecker et al. May 2007 B2
7226739 Ecker et al. Jun 2007 B2
7255992 Ecker et al. Aug 2007 B2
7285422 Little et al. Oct 2007 B1
7312036 Sampath et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321828 Cowsert et al. Jan 2008 B2
7349808 Kreiswirth et al. Mar 2008 B1
7390458 Burow et al. Jun 2008 B2
7419787 Köster Sep 2008 B2
7501251 Köster et al. Mar 2009 B2
7666588 Ecker et al. Feb 2010 B2
7714275 Hofstadler et al. May 2010 B2
7718354 Ecker et al. May 2010 B2
7741036 Ecker et al. Jun 2010 B2
7781162 Ecker et al. Aug 2010 B2
8017322 Ecker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8017358 Ecker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8017743 Ecker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8026084 Ecker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8046171 Ecker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8057993 Ecker et al. Nov 2011 B2
8071309 Ecker et al. Dec 2011 B2
8073627 Ecker et al. Dec 2011 B2
20010039263 Matthes et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020006611 Portugal et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020042112 Koster et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020042506 Kristyanne et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020045178 Cantor et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020055101 Bergeron et al. May 2002 A1
20020120408 Kreiswirth et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020137057 Wold et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138210 Wilkes et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150927 Matray et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168630 Fleming et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020187490 Tiedje et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030017487 Xue et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030027135 Ecker et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030039976 Haff Feb 2003 A1
20030050470 An et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030064483 Shaw et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073112 Zhang et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084483 Simpson et al. May 2003 A1
20030101172 De La Huerga May 2003 A1
20030104410 Mittmann Jun 2003 A1
20030104699 Minamihaba et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030113738 Liu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030113745 Monforte et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030119018 Omura et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030129589 Koster et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030134312 Burgoyne Jul 2003 A1
20030148281 Glucksmann Aug 2003 A1
20030148284 Vision et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167133 Ecker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030167134 Ecker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175695 Ecker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175697 Ecker et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175729 Van Eijk et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175969 Beliard et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030186247 Smarason et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187588 Ecker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187593 Ecker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190605 Ecker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190635 McSwiggen Oct 2003 A1
20030194699 Lewis et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203398 Bramucci et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030220844 Marnellos et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224377 Wengel et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030225529 Ecker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030228571 Ecker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030228597 Cowsert et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030228613 Bornarth et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005555 Rothman et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040013703 Ralph et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014957 Eldrup et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023207 Polansky Feb 2004 A1
20040023209 Jonasson Feb 2004 A1
20040029129 Wang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038206 Zhang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038208 Fisher et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038234 Gut et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038385 Langlois et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040081993 Cantor et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040101809 Weiss et al. May 2004 A1
20040110169 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111221 Beattie et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117129 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117354 Azzaro et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121309 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121310 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121311 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121312 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121313 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121314 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121315 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121329 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121335 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121340 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122598 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122857 Ecker et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126764 Lasken et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040137013 Katinger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040185438 Ecker Sep 2004 A1
20040191769 Marino et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040202997 Ecker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209260 Ecker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040253583 Ecker et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253619 Ecker et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050009053 Boecker et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050026147 Walker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050026641 Hokao Feb 2005 A1
20050027459 Ecker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050065813 Mishelevich et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050130196 Hofstadler et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050130216 Becker et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142584 Willson et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050250125 Novakoff Nov 2005 A1
20050266397 Ecker et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050266411 Hofstadler et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060020391 Kreiswirth et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060121520 Ecker et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060172330 Osborn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205040 Sampath Sep 2006 A1
20060240412 Hall et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259249 Sampath et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070218467 Ecker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080160512 Ecker et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080311558 Ecker et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090004643 Ecker et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090023150 Koster et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090042203 Koster Feb 2009 A1
20090092977 Koster Apr 2009 A1
20090125245 Hofstadler et al. May 2009 A1
20090148829 Ecker et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148836 Ecker et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148837 Ecker et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182511 Ecker et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090239224 Ecker et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100070194 Ecker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100145626 Ecker et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100184035 Hall et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110172925 Ecker et al. Jul 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (176)
Number Date Country
19732086 Jan 1999 DE
19802905 Jul 1999 DE
19824280 Dec 1999 DE
19852167 May 2000 DE
19943374 Mar 2001 DE
10132147 Feb 2003 DE
281390 Sep 1988 EP
0620862 Oct 1994 EP
633321 Jan 1995 EP
620862 Apr 1998 EP
1035219 Sep 2000 EP
1138782 Oct 2001 EP
1234888 Aug 2002 EP
1308506 May 2003 EP
1310571 May 2003 EP
1333101 Aug 2003 EP
1365031 Nov 2003 EP
1234888 Jan 2004 EP
1748072 Jan 2007 EP
2811321 Jan 2002 FR
2325002 Nov 1998 GB
2339905 Feb 2000 GB
5276999 Oct 1993 JP
10311784 Nov 1998 JP
11137259 May 1999 JP
2003242926 Aug 2003 JP
24024206 Jan 2004 JP
2004000200 Jan 2004 JP
2004077132 Mar 2004 JP
24201679 Jul 2004 JP
2004201641 Jul 2004 JP
WO03012058 Feb 2003 WF
WO03102191 Dec 2003 WF
WO2004009849 Jan 2004 WF
WO8803957 Jun 1988 WO
WO9015157 Dec 1990 WO
WO9205182 Apr 1992 WO
WO9208117 May 1992 WO
WO9209703 Jun 1992 WO
WO9219774 Nov 1992 WO
WO9303186 Feb 1993 WO
WO9305182 Mar 1993 WO
WO9308297 Apr 1993 WO
WO9416101 Jul 1994 WO
WO9419490 Sep 1994 WO
WO9421822 Sep 1994 WO
WO9504161 Feb 1995 WO
WO9511996 May 1995 WO
WO9513395 May 1995 WO
WO9513396 May 1995 WO
WO9531997 Nov 1995 WO
WO9606187 Feb 1996 WO
WO9616186 May 1996 WO
WO9629431 Sep 1996 WO
WO9632504 Oct 1996 WO
WO9635450 Nov 1996 WO
WO9637630 Nov 1996 WO
WO9733000 Sep 1997 WO
WO9734909 Sep 1997 WO
WO9737041 Oct 1997 WO
WO9747766 Dec 1997 WO
WO9803684 Jan 1998 WO
WO9812355 Mar 1998 WO
WO9814616 Apr 1998 WO
WO9815652 Apr 1998 WO
WO9820020 May 1998 WO
WO9820157 May 1998 WO
WO9820166 May 1998 WO
WO9826095 Jun 1998 WO
WO9831830 Jul 1998 WO
WO9835057 Aug 1998 WO
WO9840520 Sep 1998 WO
WO9854571 Dec 1998 WO
WO9854751 Dec 1998 WO
WO9905319 Feb 1999 WO
WO9912040 Mar 1999 WO
WO9913104 Mar 1999 WO
WO9914375 Mar 1999 WO
WO9929898 Jun 1999 WO
WO9931278 Jun 1999 WO
WO9957318 Nov 1999 WO
WO9958713 Nov 1999 WO
WO9960183 Nov 1999 WO
WO0032750 Jun 2000 WO
WO0038636 Jul 2000 WO
WO0063362 Oct 2000 WO
WO0066762 Nov 2000 WO
WO0066789 Nov 2000 WO
WO0077260 Dec 2000 WO
WO0100828 Jan 2001 WO
WO0107648 Feb 2001 WO
WO0112853 Feb 2001 WO
WO0120018 Mar 2001 WO
WO0123604 Apr 2001 WO
WO0123608 Apr 2001 WO
WO0132930 May 2001 WO
WO0140497 Jun 2001 WO
WO0146404 Jun 2001 WO
WO0151661 Jul 2001 WO
WO0151662 Jul 2001 WO
WO0157263 Aug 2001 WO
WO0157518 Aug 2001 WO
WO0173119 Oct 2001 WO
WO0173199 Oct 2001 WO
WO0177392 Oct 2001 WO
WO0196388 Dec 2001 WO
WO0202811 Jan 2002 WO
WO0210186 Feb 2002 WO
WO0210444 Feb 2002 WO
WO0218641 Mar 2002 WO
WO0221108 Mar 2002 WO
WO0222873 Mar 2002 WO
WO0224876 Mar 2002 WO
WO0250307 Jun 2002 WO
WO02057491 Jul 2002 WO
WO02070664 Sep 2002 WO
WO02070728 Sep 2002 WO
WO02070737 Sep 2002 WO
WO02077278 Oct 2002 WO
WO02099034 Dec 2002 WO
WO02099095 Dec 2002 WO
WO02099129 Dec 2002 WO
WO02099130 Dec 2002 WO
WO03001976 Jan 2003 WO
WO03002750 Jan 2003 WO
WO03008636 Jan 2003 WO
WO03012074 Feb 2003 WO
WO03014382 Feb 2003 WO
WO03016546 Feb 2003 WO
WO03018636 Mar 2003 WO
WO03020890 Mar 2003 WO
WO03033732 Apr 2003 WO
WO03054162 Jul 2003 WO
WO03054755 Jul 2003 WO
WO03060163 Jul 2003 WO
WO03075955 Sep 2003 WO
WO03088979 Oct 2003 WO
WO03093506 Nov 2003 WO
WO03097869 Nov 2003 WO
WO03100035 Dec 2003 WO
WO03100068 Dec 2003 WO
WO03104410 Dec 2003 WO
WO03106635 Dec 2003 WO
WO2004003511 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004011651 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004013357 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004040013 May 2004 WO
WO2004044123 May 2004 WO
WO2004044247 May 2004 WO
WO2004052175 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004053076 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004053141 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004053164 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004060278 Jul 2004 WO
WO2004070001 Aug 2004 WO
WO2004072230 Aug 2004 WO
WO2004072231 Aug 2004 WO
WO2004101809 Nov 2004 WO
WO2005003384 Jan 2005 WO
WO2005009202 Feb 2005 WO
WO2005012572 Feb 2005 WO
WO2005024046 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005036369 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005054454 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005075686 Aug 2005 WO
WO2005086634 Sep 2005 WO
WO2005091971 Oct 2005 WO
WO2005098047 Oct 2005 WO
WO2005116263 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006089762 Aug 2006 WO
WO2006094238 Sep 2006 WO
WO2006135400 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007014045 Feb 2007 WO
WO2007086904 Aug 2007 WO
WO2008104002 Aug 2008 WO
WO2008118809 Oct 2008 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100127165 A1 May 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60574042 May 2004 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11136134 May 2005 US
Child 12694131 US