The invention relates to the field of detection and characterization of large analytes, such as biomolecules, by molecular mass analysis.
Mass spectrometry has been used for many decades in the characterization of small organic molecules. The technique typically involves the ionization of molecules in the sample to form molecular ions by subjecting the sample to an electron beam at a very low pressure. The molecular ions are then focused and accelerated by an electric field into a magnetic field or quadrupole. The ions are separated in the magnetic field or quadrupole according to the ratio of the mass of the ion m to the charge on the ion z (m/z). After passing through the field, the ions impinge upon a detector which determines the intensity of the ion beam and the m/z ratio, and these data are used to create the mass spectrum of the sample.
With the increasing interest in larger molecules, especially biomolecules such as nucleic acids and proteins, new techniques in the field of mass spectrometry are continually being developed to characterize these molecules.
In recent years the performance of commercially available mass spectrometers has seen significant improvement due, in part, to the availability of improved core components including more stable power supplies, faster digitizers, and more sophisticated fabrication methods for ion optic elements. Particularly noteworthy are the newest generation ESI-TOF mass spectrometers which, from several vendors in a variety of configurations, are now routinely yielding the types of mass measurement accuracy and mass resolution previously attainable only on high end sector or Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR)-based platforms. As such, the use of such bench top instruments by the bioanalytical community continues to expand as these instruments are increasingly being made available to scientists and technicians with a broad range of analytical needs. Accordingly, a number of increasingly sophisticated automation schemes are emerging, many incorporating some form of liquid chromatography (LC) as an on-line sample purification step to support high throughput QC or drug screening activities. While there are a number of applications in which some form of LC is a requisite step that facilitates the analysis of very complex mixtures, it is also used frequently as a generic desalting/purification protocol to prepare relatively pure analyte fractions for MS analysis.
Low molecular weight chemical noise is often the limiting factor in overall MS performance as the presence of high levels of low molecular weight components, such as polymers and buffer constituents, can drastically limit the spectral dynamic range and adversely affect mass accuracy. While LC is often used to reduce the adverse affects of such backgrounds, constraints on sample throughput and issues associated with solvent usage/disposal must be considered as part of the laboratory work flow. Additionally, LC is often used as a purification step (as opposed to a separation step) to render analytes amenable to MS analysis. Consequently, there is an increasing need for simple methods to reduce the chemical noise floor and render less than “pristine” samples amenable to mass spectrometric analysis.
The present invention satisfies this need, as well as others, by providing systems and methods for digital filtration of mass spectral signals arising from singly-charged low molecular weight components such as solution additives and matrix modifiers without significantly altering the mass spectral signals of larger analytes such as biomolecules.
The present invention is directed to methods of identifying a multiply-charged ion. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a digital threshold filter which is in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be set at the digital threshold filter and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, the digital threshold filter independently outputs a digital signal to a data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing step of the method is then effected by specifying a digital signal threshold such that, upon a mass spectrometer measurement of the multiply-charged ion, the filtered digital signal output to the data file originates from the detection of the multiply-charged ion and excludes digital signal output from analog signals arising from singly-charged ions.
The present invention is also directed to methods for determining the molecular mass of a plurality of analytes in a mixture. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters, each in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be independently set at any of the plurality of digital threshold filters, each of which is in digital data communication with the digitizer and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputs a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing steps of the method are then effected by specifying a unique digital signal threshold at some members of the plurality of digital threshold filters, making a mass spectrometer measurement of the mixture, wherein each unique digital signal threshold differentially filters digital signals arising from the plurality of analytes and produces a unique digital signal output to each corresponding data file. The measurement results in storage of a plurality of data files. In the final step, each of the plurality of data files is analyzed and the molecular mass of at least one member of the plurality of analytes is contained in each of the plurality of data files.
The present invention is also directed to methods for calibrating a mass spectrum of an analyte. A mass spectrometer that comprises the following components is provided: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters, each in digital data communication with the digitizer. A digital signal threshold can be independently set at any of the plurality of digital threshold filters, each of which is in digital data communication with the digitizer and, in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer, independently outputs a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The continuing steps of the method are then effected by specifying a first unique digital signal threshold at one digital threshold filter such that digital signal output to a first data file has signals from both the analyte and a calibrant ion and then specifying a second unique digital signal threshold at another digital threshold filter such that the digital signal output to a second data file has signals from the analyte but not the calibrant. The second data file is subtracted from the first data file to obtain a calibration file which is then used to calibrate the mass spectrum.
The present invention is also directed to a system comprised of a mass spectrometer that comprises the following components: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold which are each in digital data communication with the digitizer and in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. The system has a plurality of data files and a plurality of parallel digital signal output transferring means, each of which is in digital data communication with one of the plurality of digital threshold filters and a corresponding data file from the plurality of data files.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the mass spectrometer system comprises the following components: (i) an ion detector, (ii) a digitizer that converts an analog signal to a digital signal, (iii) an analog signal transfer means for transferring an analog signal from the detector to the digitizer, and (iv) a plurality of digital threshold filters for setting a digital signal threshold which are each in digital data communication with the digitizer and in response to a digital signal input from the digitizer independently outputting a digital signal to a corresponding data file only if the digital signal input is greater than the specified digital signal threshold. In some embodiments, the analog and digital signals are voltage signals and the analog to digital converter (ADC) converts the analog voltage signal to a digital voltage signal. In some embodiments, a plurality of mass spectrometer measurements are made and the resulting plurality of data files are co-added.
In other embodiments, the mass spectrometer system comprises a (iv) single digital threshold filter instead of a plurality of digital threshold filters. The single digital threshold filter is in digital data communication with the digitizer and a corresponding data file.
In some embodiments, the mass spectrometer is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, a linear quadrupole mass spectrometer, a linear trap mass spectrometer, an electric/magnetic sector mass spectrometer or a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. In some embodiments, ions are produced by electrospray ionization (ESI).
In some embodiments, the multiply-charged analyte is a biomolecule such as, for example, a nucleic acid, a protein, a carbohydrate or a lipid. Examples of nucleic acids include, but are not limited to, RNA constructs used to screen small molecules for drug discovery and amplification products such as PCR products which can be used for genetic analyses. In some embodiments, the multiply-charged analyte is of a molecular weight of 5-500 kDa, 25-250 kDa, or 50-100 kDa.
In some embodiments, the method allows for ESI-TOF characterization of biomolecules in the presence of biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers used in online separation techniques. Stabilizing agents include, but are not limited to, buffer salts such as phosphates for example, ampholytes, glycerol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, reducing agents, detergents, and the like. Matrix modifiers may be any type of additive used to effect a solution matrix property advantageous to an analytical separation and may include, but are not limited to, ampholytes, detergents and buffer salts such as phosphates for example.
In some embodiments, the biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers are singly-charged when detected by the mass spectrometer. In other embodiments, the biomolecule stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers have one or two charges.
In some embodiments, when a plurality of digital signal threshold filters are employed in the mass spectrometer system, a plurality of unique digital signal thresholds are specified in order to obtain parallel differentially filtered data streams which are stored in corresponding data files. In some embodiments, any member of the data files may be subtracted from any of the other data files to obtain a more accurate representation of a given analyte signal. These embodiments may be used to obtain a more accurate mass spectrum of a calibrant ion, or any other lower molecular weight contaminating ion by subtracting out an overlapping signal from an ion having a similar m/z but with a larger molecular mass.
In some embodiments, the methods described herein which employ multiple differentially thresholded data streams may be used in multiplexed data acquisition of a plurality of ions such as those obtained from chemical, protease or restriction digestion of proteins or nucleic acids.
In some embodiments, the methods described herein may be used to reduce the burden of level of purification of large molecular weight or multiply charged analytes such as biomolecules, for example, from stabilizing agents or matrix modifiers.
A Bruker Daltonics (Billerica, Mass.) MicroTOF ESI time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer was used in this work. Ions from the ESI source undergo orthogonal ion extraction and are focused in a reflectron prior to detection. Ions are formed in the standard MicroTOF ESI source which is equipped with an off-axis sprayer and glass capillary. For operation in the negative ion mode, the atmospheric pressure end of the glass capillary is biased at 6000 V relative to the ESI needle during data acquisition. A counter-current flow of dry N2 is employed to assist in the desolvation process. External ion accumulation is employed to improve ionization duty cycle during data acquisition. Each ESI-TOF spectrum is comprised of 75,000 data points digitized over 75 μs. All aspects of data acquisition were controlled by the Bruker MicroTOF software package. Post processing of data was also performed using the standard Bruker software.
All PCR reactions were assembled in 50 μL reaction volumes in a 96 well microtiter plate format using a Packard MPII liquid handling robotic platform and M.J. Dyad thermocyclers (MJ research, Waltham, Mass.). The PCR reaction mix consists of 4 units of Amplitaq Gold, 1× buffer II (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4M betaine, 800 μM dNTP mix and 250 nM of primer. The following PCR conditions were used: 95° C. for 10 min followed by 50 cycles of 95° C. for 30 sec, 50° C. for 30 sec, and 72° C. for 30 sec.
PCR products were purified using the protocols disclosed and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/943,344 which is commonly owned and incorporated herein by reference in entirety.
In an attempt to optimize detection efficiency of large oligonucleotide ions, and to better understand the relationship between ion arrival statistics and mass accuracy, a detailed systematic study was designed to investigate detector response as a function of molecular weight, m/z, and charge state at the individual ion level.
In time of flight mass spectrometry ions are separated based on differences in their velocity as they traverse the flight tube. As ions strike the detector, their arrival times are recorded and subsequently converted to m/z based on the specific configuration of the spectrometer (length of flight path, accelerating voltage, geometry, etc.). It is generally accepted that for singly charged species, detector response is inversely proportional to molecular weight (velocity) and, for example in the case of MALDI, higher molecular weight species induce a smaller detection signal than lower molecular weight species. It was suspected that lower charge states (i.e. lower velocity species) induce a smaller signal than do the higher charge states (i.e. high velocity species) under the same accelerating voltages. The reduced response of high molecular weight “slow” ions can be partially ameliorated by the use of post-acceleration methods in which ions are accelerated to very high kinetic energies immediately prior to detection.
During the course of this investigation, it became immediately apparent that ions of the same nominal m/z but different molecular weights induced significantly different detector responses. The heavier, more highly charged ions consistently produced detector responses several times that of their singly charged counterparts at the same m/z. Thus, while in the TOF mass analyzer ions of the same m/z have the same velocity, ions of different molecular weigh do not have the same momentum or kinetic energy and do not induce the same signal on the detector.
This phenomenon is readily illustrated by examining spectral response as a function of the digital threshold employed to acquire mass spectra of species covering a range of molecular weights.
Unlike MALDI of large biomolecules, the multiple charging phenomenon inherent to the ESI process generally produces mass spectra in which the majority of the signals are in the same m/z range. Molecular ions from moderate to large biomolecules (1 kDa to 100 kDa) are generally detected in the 500-2000 m/z range and it is thus not at all uncommon for complex mixtures to yield spectra in which peaks of many different masses are detected at the same m/z. To characterize detector response as a function of molecular weight (charge), solutions containing analytes with molecular weight ratios of 1.0, 3.7, 11.8, 21.5, and 43 were analyzed at a range of digital thresholds. For each series, a single charge at or near m/z 1233 was used to gauge the detector response. The resulting molecular weight isopleths are plotted in
Under the acquisition conditions routinely employed to characterize PCR products, individual scans are acquired and co-added at a rate of 75 kHz. Thus for a typical 45 second acquisition, each spectrum is comprised of 660,000 co-added individual scans. In order to reduce the shot/white noise in the co-added spectrum, the MicroTOF electronics allow one to set a digital filter threshold (voltage cutoff) such that white noise from the detector at the single or low-bit ADC count is zeroed out of each scan and only detector responses consistent with ion detection events are passed to the transient summing digitizer data system to be co-added. This concept is shown schematically in
To minimize the deleterious effects of co-adding low-bit detector noise, the MicroTOF electronics allow the user to set a cutoff voltage that has the net effect of zeroing-out low level signals that are attributed only to detector noise. As illustrated in
A key challenge in the analysis of large biopolymers by ESI-MS is sample purification. Low molecular weight contaminants in biopolymer solutions can have deleterious effects on the quality of ESI-MS spectra and can significantly limit the dynamic range and accuracy of the measurement. In some cases these low molecular weight “contaminants” are actually required additives as components of an on-line separations. Such additives include ampholytes used in capillary isoelectric focusing, phosphates commonly used as components of buffers used in capillary zone electrophoresis, and solution matrix modifiers used to promote micelle formation in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Similarly, electrospray incompatible additives such as glycerol and polymers (polyethelene glycol, PPG) are often used to stabilize enzymes to be used in biochemical processes. These compounds often make their way through an entire biochemical process and end up in the mass spectrometer. A key example of the latter type of “contaminant” is the presence of high levels of polyethelene glycol and polypropylene glycol polymers in the Taq polymerase used for PCR. While typically only 1-2 μL of Taq are used in each 50 μL PCR reaction, the relatively high concentration of polymer in the presence of the relatively low concentration of PCR products (typically 10-100 nM), coupled with the fact that such polymers are ionized with high efficiency, may cause a significant chemical noise suppression issue.
a illustrates an example of an ESI-TOF spectrum of a 140-mer PCR product into which a contaminating amount of PPG was spiked along with relatively high levels of singly charged peptides (which serve as internal mass standards). The signal from the charge state envelope of the multiply charged strands of the PCR amplicons is confounded by the presence of the intense signal arising from the low molecular weight species. This spectrum was acquired using a “normal” digital threshold setting in which the detector white noise output from the digitizer is filtered out but the threshold is set low enough to ensure that signals from singly charged ions are captured. This spectrum is exemplary of a common situation in which a large biopolymer is analyzed in the presence of a significant chemical noise background arising from low molecular weight contaminants. As shown, such interferences can adversely affect the mass accuracy of the measurement and result in reduced spectral dynamic range.
In contrast, the ESI-TOF spectrum in
Indicating the applicability of the method for biomolecules other than nucleic acids,
These data indicate that in some high throughput screening and QC applications a less rigorous sample purification protocol might be employed and chemical noise can be removed via the digital filtering approach described above. Importantly, this approach allows ESI-MS analysis of large biomolecules (or noncovalent complexes) from solutions which might otherwise contain too much chemical noise to produce interpretable spectra.
By reducing or eliminating the chemical noise floor in addition to reducing the electronic noise floor, significant improvements in dynamic range and spectral quality are attainable. This concept is demonstrated in
The improvement in effective dynamic range afforded by the present invention is further illustrated in
In addition to reducing the useful dynamic range of a mass spectrum, chemical noise and low molecular weight contaminants can have adverse affects on accurate mass measurements. As described above, ESI-MS spectra often have overlapping peaks that result from species of different molecular weights but the same m/z. This is particularly problematic for large biopolymer ions which generally produce somewhat congested spectra in which multiple charge states are observed in the 500 to 2000 m/z range. Because low molecular weight species are isotopically resolved and species above about 10 kDa are generally not, it is quite common to see a low molecular weight contaminant peak overlap with and distort an otherwise analytically useful analyte peak. An example of this is shown in
In Table 1, 7-11 indicates that a spectrum obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 11 mV was subtracted from a spectrum obtained with a digital signal threshold setting of 7 mV.
In accordance with the present invention, the experiments illustrated in
In this work all of the high threshold/low threshold comparisons were made by multiple measurements of the same analyte solution acquired under identical instrument conditions except the digital threshold was varied. This was done out of necessity because, as illustrated in
In accordance with the present invention and as a means of circumventing this problem, the alternative digitization scheme illustrated in
Having multiple variably-thresholded mass spectra derived from the identical digitization event would guarantee perfect subtraction of spectral features and would eliminate potential artifacts which may arise from spectral drift over the course of acquiring multiple spectra. Importantly, this also means that one could introduce low molecular weight internal mass standards (calibrants) to very accurately calibrate the m/z axis (e.g. the PPG series in
Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Each reference (including, but not limited to, journal articles, U.S. and non-U.S. patents, patent application publications, international patent application publications, gene bank accession numbers, and the like) cited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/574,042 filed May 24, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4075475 | Risby et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4683195 | Mullis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4965188 | Mullis et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5015845 | Allen et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5072115 | Zhou | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5143905 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5213961 | Bunn et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5219727 | Wang et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5288611 | Kohne | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5436129 | Stapleton | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5451500 | Stapleton | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5472843 | Milliman | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476774 | Wang et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484908 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5502177 | Matteucci et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5503980 | Cantor | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5504327 | Sproch et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5504329 | Mann et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5523217 | Lupski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527669 | Resnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527675 | Coull et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5547835 | Koster | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5567587 | Kohne | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576204 | Blanco et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580733 | Levis et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5605798 | Koster | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608217 | Franzen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5612179 | Simons | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5622824 | Koster | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625184 | Vestal et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5639606 | Willey | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641632 | Kohne | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645985 | Froehler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5683869 | Ramsay Shaw et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5686242 | Bruice et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691141 | Koster | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5700642 | Monforte et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702895 | Matsunaga et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707802 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5712125 | Uhlen | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716825 | Hancock et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5727202 | Kucala | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5745751 | Nelson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747246 | Pannetier et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5747251 | Carson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5753467 | Jensen et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5753489 | Kistner et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5759771 | Tilanus | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5763169 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5763588 | Matteucci et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770367 | Southern et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777324 | Hillenkamp | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5814442 | Natarajan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822824 | Dion | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828062 | Jarrell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830655 | Monforte et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830853 | Backstrom et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832489 | Kucala | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834255 | Van Gemen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845174 | Yasui et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849492 | Rogan | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849497 | Steinman | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849901 | Mabilat et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851765 | Koster | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856174 | Lipshutz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864137 | Becker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866429 | Bloch | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5869242 | Kamb | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871697 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872003 | Koster | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876936 | Ju | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876938 | Stolowitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885775 | Haff et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900481 | Lough et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5928905 | Stemmer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928906 | Koster et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5965363 | Monforte et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5965383 | Vogel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972693 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976798 | Parker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981176 | Wallace | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981190 | Israel | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994066 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001564 | Bergeron et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007690 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007992 | Lin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015666 | Springer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018713 | Coli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6024925 | Little et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028183 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6043031 | Koster et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046005 | Ju et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051378 | Monforte et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054278 | Dodge et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055487 | Margery et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6060246 | Summerton et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061686 | Gauvin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063031 | Cundari et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074823 | Koster | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074831 | Yakhini et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090558 | Butler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6104028 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110710 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111251 | Hillenkamp | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6133436 | Koster et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140053 | Koster | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146144 | Fowler et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146854 | Koster et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153389 | Haarer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159681 | Zebala | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6180339 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180372 | Franzen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6187842 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194114 | Toyoda et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194144 | Koster | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197498 | Koster | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214555 | Leushner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218118 | Sampson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221587 | Ecker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221598 | Schumm et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221601 | Koster et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221605 | Koster | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225450 | Koster | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235476 | Bergmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235478 | Koster | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235480 | Shultz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238871 | Koster | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238927 | Abrams et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239159 | Brown et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6258538 | Koster et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261769 | Everett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265716 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265718 | Park et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266131 | Hamada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266144 | Li | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268129 | Gut et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268131 | Kang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268144 | Koster | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268146 | Shultz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270973 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6270974 | Shultz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6274726 | Laugharn, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277573 | Koster | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277578 | Shultz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277634 | McCall et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6300076 | Koster | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303297 | Lincoln et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312893 | Van Ness et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6312902 | Shultz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322970 | Little et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6361940 | Van Ness et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6372424 | Brow et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389428 | Rigault et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391551 | Shultz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393367 | Tang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6419932 | Dale | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423966 | Hillenkamp et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6428955 | Koster et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6428956 | Crooke et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432651 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436635 | Fu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436640 | Simmons et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453244 | Oefner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458533 | Felder et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468743 | Romick et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468748 | Monforte et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475143 | Iliff | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6475736 | Stanton, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6475738 | Shuber et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6479239 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6500621 | Koster | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6553317 | Lincoln et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558902 | Hillenkamp | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6563025 | Song et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6566055 | Monforte et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6568055 | Tang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6582916 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6586584 | McMillian et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589485 | Koster | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6602662 | Koster et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605433 | Fliss et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610492 | Stanton, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613509 | Chen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6613520 | Ashby | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623928 | Van Ness et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6638714 | Linnen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6680476 | Hidalgo et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6682889 | Wang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6705530 | Kiekhaefer | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6706530 | Hillenkamp | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6783939 | Olmsted et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6800289 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6813615 | Colasanti et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6836742 | Brekenfeld | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6852487 | Barany et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6856914 | Pelech | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6875593 | Froehler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6906316 | Sugiyama et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6906319 | Hoyes | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6914137 | Baker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6939367 | Harrison | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6977148 | Dean et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6994962 | Thilly | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7022835 | Rauth et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7024370 | Epler et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7108974 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7198893 | Köster et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7217510 | Ecker et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7226739 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7255992 | Ecker et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7285422 | Little et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7312036 | Sampath et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321828 | Cowsert et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7349808 | Kreiswirth et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7390458 | Burow et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7419787 | Köster | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7501251 | Köster et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7666588 | Ecker et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7714275 | Hofstadler et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7718354 | Ecker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7741036 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7781162 | Ecker et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8017322 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8017358 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8017743 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8026084 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8046171 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8057993 | Ecker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8071309 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8073627 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 20010039263 | Matthes et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006611 | Portugal et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042112 | Koster et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042506 | Kristyanne et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045178 | Cantor et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055101 | Bergeron et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120408 | Kreiswirth et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137057 | Wold et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138210 | Wilkes et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020150927 | Matray et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168630 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187490 | Tiedje et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030017487 | Xue et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030027135 | Ecker et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039976 | Haff | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050470 | An et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064483 | Shaw et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073112 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084483 | Simpson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101172 | De La Huerga | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104410 | Mittmann | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104699 | Minamihaba et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113738 | Liu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113745 | Monforte et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119018 | Omura et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129589 | Koster et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134312 | Burgoyne | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148281 | Glucksmann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148284 | Vision et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167133 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167134 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175695 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175697 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175729 | Van Eijk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175969 | Beliard et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030186247 | Smarason et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187588 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187593 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190605 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190635 | McSwiggen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030194699 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203398 | Bramucci et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220844 | Marnellos et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224377 | Wengel et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225529 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228571 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228597 | Cowsert et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228613 | Bornarth et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005555 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013703 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040014957 | Eldrup et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023207 | Polansky | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023209 | Jonasson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029129 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038206 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038208 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038234 | Gut et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038385 | Langlois et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081993 | Cantor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101809 | Weiss et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040110169 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111221 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117129 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117354 | Azzaro et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121309 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121310 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121311 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121312 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121313 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121314 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121315 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121329 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121335 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121340 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122598 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122857 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126764 | Lasken et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137013 | Katinger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185438 | Ecker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191769 | Marino et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202997 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209260 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040253583 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040253619 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009053 | Boecker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026147 | Walker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026641 | Hokao | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027459 | Ecker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065813 | Mishelevich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130196 | Hofstadler et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130216 | Becker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142584 | Willson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250125 | Novakoff | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266397 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266411 | Hofstadler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060020391 | Kreiswirth et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121520 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060172330 | Osborn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205040 | Sampath | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240412 | Hall et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259249 | Sampath et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070218467 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080160512 | Ecker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311558 | Ecker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004643 | Ecker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090023150 | Koster et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042203 | Koster | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092977 | Koster | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125245 | Hofstadler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148829 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148836 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148837 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182511 | Ecker et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239224 | Ecker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100070194 | Ecker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145626 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184035 | Hall et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110172925 | Ecker et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19732086 | Jan 1999 | DE |
| 19802905 | Jul 1999 | DE |
| 19824280 | Dec 1999 | DE |
| 19852167 | May 2000 | DE |
| 19943374 | Mar 2001 | DE |
| 10132147 | Feb 2003 | DE |
| 281390 | Sep 1988 | EP |
| 0620862 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 633321 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 620862 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 1035219 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1138782 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1234888 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1308506 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1310571 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1333101 | Aug 2003 | EP |
| 1365031 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1234888 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1748072 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 2811321 | Jan 2002 | FR |
| 2325002 | Nov 1998 | GB |
| 2339905 | Feb 2000 | GB |
| 5276999 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 10311784 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 11137259 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2003242926 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 24024206 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004000200 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004077132 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 24201679 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004201641 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| WO03012058 | Feb 2003 | WF |
| WO03102191 | Dec 2003 | WF |
| WO2004009849 | Jan 2004 | WF |
| WO8803957 | Jun 1988 | WO |
| WO9015157 | Dec 1990 | WO |
| WO9205182 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO9208117 | May 1992 | WO |
| WO9209703 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO9219774 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO9303186 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| WO9305182 | Mar 1993 | WO |
| WO9308297 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO9416101 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO9419490 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO9421822 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO9504161 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO9511996 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO9513395 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO9513396 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO9531997 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO9606187 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO9616186 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO9629431 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO9632504 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO9635450 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO9637630 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO9733000 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO9734909 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO9737041 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO9747766 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO9803684 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO9812355 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO9814616 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO9815652 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO9820020 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO9820157 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO9820166 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO9826095 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO9831830 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO9835057 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO9840520 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO9854571 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO9854751 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO9905319 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO9912040 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO9913104 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO9914375 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO9929898 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO9931278 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO9957318 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO9958713 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO9960183 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO0032750 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO0038636 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO0063362 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO0066762 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO0066789 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO0077260 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO0100828 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO0107648 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO0112853 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO0120018 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO0123604 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO0123608 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO0132930 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO0140497 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0146404 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0151661 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO0151662 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO0157263 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0157518 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0173119 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0173199 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0177392 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0196388 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO0202811 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO0210186 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO0210444 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO0218641 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO0221108 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO0222873 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO0224876 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO0250307 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO02057491 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO02070664 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO02070728 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO02070737 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO02077278 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO02099034 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO02099095 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO02099129 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO02099130 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO03001976 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO03002750 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO03008636 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO03012074 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03014382 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03016546 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03018636 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO03020890 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO03033732 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO03054162 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03054755 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03060163 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03075955 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO03088979 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO03093506 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO03097869 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO03100035 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO03100068 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO03104410 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO03106635 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO2004003511 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO2004011651 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO2004013357 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO2004040013 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004044123 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004044247 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004052175 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2004053076 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2004053141 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2004053164 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2004060278 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO2004070001 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004072230 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004072231 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004101809 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO2005003384 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2005009202 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005012572 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005024046 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005036369 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO2005054454 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO2005075686 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO2005086634 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005091971 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO2005098047 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO2005116263 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2006089762 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO2006094238 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO2006135400 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO2007014045 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO2007086904 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO2008104002 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO2008118809 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100127165 A1 | May 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60574042 | May 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11136134 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 12694131 | US |