Method and apparatus for measuring etch uniformity of a semiconductor wafer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6649075
  • Patent Number
    6,649,075
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 23, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for performing in situ measurement of etch uniformity within a semiconductor wafer processing system. Specifically, the apparatus and concomitant method analyzes optical emission spectroscopy (OES) data produced by an OES system. The analysis computes the first derivative of the OES data as the data is acquired. When the data meets a particular trigger criterion, the value of the first derivative is correlated with a particular uniformity value. As such, the system produces a uniformity value for a semiconductor wafer using an in situ measurement technique.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to semiconductor wafer processing systems that perform “dry” etching of semiconductor wafers. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for performing in situ measurement of etch uniformity as a semiconductor wafer is etched by a semiconductor processing system.




2. Description of the Background Art




Semiconductor processing systems that perform “dry” etch of semiconductor wafers typically rely upon post processing analysis to determine the uniformity of the etch process. To use such post processing techniques, a plurality of wafers are etched and then the amount of material removed by the etch process is measured using depth-measuring equipment, such as a laser interferometer for transparent films or profilometer for opaque films. The measuring equipment measures the etch results at various points on the wafer surface. The relative depth of each point provides an indication of etch uniformity. Such wafer post processing is expensive and consumes many wafers before the uniformity produced by the etch process is satisfactory.




There has been some success in the art in developing in situ etch uniformity measuring systems that utilize optical emission spectroscopy to monitor light emissions from the plasma as the etch process progresses. One such system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,356 issued Nov. 8, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference. This patent discloses a passive method of monitoring film removal (or deposition) during plasma etching (or deposition) based on interference phenomena. The system monitors plasma emission intensity at a selected wavelength, without additional illuminating apparatus, and variations in plasma emission intensity are correlated to remaining film thickness, etch rate, etch uniformity and etch selectivity. However, to derive a uniformity for a wafer being etched, the '356 invention must make certain assumptions concerning the etch rate and the thickness of the wafer films in order to predict the uniformity at any point during the etch process. Such assumptions can be error prone.




Therefore, a need exists in the art for a method and apparatus for performing direct, in situ measurement of etch uniformity.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The disadvantages associated with the prior art are overcome by the present invention of a method and apparatus for performing direct, in situ measurement of etch uniformity. Specifically, the present invention analyzes optical emission spectroscopy (OES) data produced by an etch rate monitoring system. The invention computes the first derivative of the OES data as the data is acquired. When the OES data meets a predefined trigger criterion (i.e., a trigger point) such as attaining the etch endpoint or reaching an inflection point in the data, the invention correlates the value of the first derivative with a particular uniformity value. The correlation can be accomplished using a look-up table or a correlation equation. The look-up table or correlation equation are predefined using empirical data. The invention then displays the uniformity value and/or responds in some manner to the uniformity value. The present invention has been found to accurately predict etch uniformity using this direct, in situ measurement technique. As such, extensive post-processing is not necessary which substantially reduces the costs associated with performing an etch process.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

depicts a block diagram of an optical emission spectroscopy system incorporating the present invention;





FIG. 2

depicts a block diagram of a computer system that executes a software implementation of the present invention;





FIG. 3

depicts a flow diagram of an etch uniformity derivation routine that is executed by the computer system of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

depicts an illustrative curve of OES data and its first derivative; and





FIG. 5

depicts an illustrative curve that correlates etch uniformity with the first derivative of the OES data curve.




To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention is a method and apparatus for performing a direct, in situ measurement of etch uniformity of a semiconductor wafer within a semiconductor wafer processing system. The invention analyzes optical emission spectroscopy (OES) data collected as a semiconductor wafer is being etched within an etching system, such as Model PE5000 manufactured by Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. The OES data may be collected by any type of in situ measuring equipment that provides accurate OES data. Such a system is the OES endpoint system manufactured by Applied Materials, Inc. as an integrated emissions endpoint module for the Model PE5000. Although an OES system is illustratively used for data acquisition, the invention can be used with any system that produces data that indicates etch process progression, e.g., interferometric systems. To simplify the disclosure of the invention, the following discussion presents the invention as adapted to operate within an OES system. From this disclosure, those skilled could adapt the invention to operate within other forms of etch process monitoring system.





FIG. 1

depicts a block diagram of an OES system


100


, also known as an optical emission endpoint detection system. The hardware of this system is conventionally used for endpoint detection, whereby data is collected from a monochromator module


110


as it monitors a particular wavelength of emitted light from a plasma in a process chamber


102


. A particular change in the intensity of an emission at the monitored wavelength is indicative of the endpoint for the etch process. A typical endpoint detection system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. 5,362,356, issued Nov. 8, 1994. Further processing and analysis of a particular wavelength emission (e.g., the carbon-monoxide (CO) emission line at 4835 angstroms) as the magnitude of the emission changes during the etch process produces information that is indicative of the uniformity of the etch process. The invention is implemented in software within a computer system that processes and analyzes the OES data to deduce the etch uniformity across the wafer surface.




Specifically,

FIG. 1

depicts a process chamber


102


of, for example, a PE5000 etching system


100


connected by a fiber optic cable


103


to the integrated emissions endpoint module


101


. The integrated emissions endpoint module contains a monochromator module


110


, controller electronics


118


and a computer system


122


. The monochromator module further contains a monochromator


104


, a stepper motor


112


for controlling the wavelength selection for the monochromator, a calibration lamp


114


for calibrating the monochromator, a photomultiplier tube


106


, a high-voltage power supply


108


, and a monochromator interface board


116


. In operation, light generated by a plasma within the process chamber


102


is coupled to the monochromator through the fiber optic cable


103


. The monochromator converts the photons carried by the fiber optic cable


103


into electrons. The electrons are multiplied by the photomultiplier tube


106


that is powered by the high-voltage power supply


108


. The output of the photomultiplier tube


106


is coupled to the monochromator interface board


116


.




In addition, the monochromator interface board


116


controls the stepper motor


112


that selects a particular light wavelength for processing. In particular, the stepper motor controls the position of an interference grid (not shown) within the monochromator to select a particular wavelength of light for analysis. The calibration lamp


114


is coupled to the monochromator to calibrate the monochromator at a particular wavelength.




A DB-25 electrical cable connects the monochromator interface board


116


to the controller interface board


120


within controller electronics


118






The control electronics are coupled to the computer system


122


via a computer bus


126


, e.g., a serial bus. The conventional endpoint software


128


, as well as the etch uniformity derivation software


124


of the present invention and the computer operating system


130


, are stored within and executed by the computer system


122


.




The hardware for implementing the foregoing integrated emission endpoint module


101


is available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. For example, the fiber optic cable is available from Applied Materials, Inc. as part number 0190-09134, the monochromator as part number 0010-09935, the controller electronics as part number 0240-10475, and the computer system as part number 0240-32585.





FIG. 2

depicts a detailed block diagram of the computer system 122 which facilitates OES data analysis, processing and display. Specifically, the computer


200


contains a central processing unit (CPU)


204


, support circuitry


206


, random access memory (RAM)


208


, read only memory (ROM)


212


, mass storage device


214


(e.g., a disk drive), and a display driver


216


. Additionally, a user interacts with the computer system through one or more input devices


220


, such as a keyboard, mouse, trackball, touch pad, and the like. Also, the computer system displays the data, various graphical interface displays, and the uniformity value(s) on an output display device


218


, such as a computer monitor. Alternatively, the computer system may also interact with other output display devices, such as a printer, to provide hard copy of any display that appears on the computer monitor.




The controller interface board


120


preprocesses the data from the monochromator module


110


and provides data transport between the monochromator module and the CPU


204






The CPU


204


is a general purpose processor such as a PowerPC, Pentium, or some other generally available processor. PowerPC is a registered trademark of International Business Machines of Armonk, N.Y. and Pentium is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation, of Santa Clara, Calif. Since the software implementation of the present invention is not required to execute on any specific processor, routines implementing the present invention can be executed upon any type of processor or combination of processors in a parallel processing computer environment. The present embodiment of the invention described herein executes on a Pentium processor that is manufactured by Intel Corporation, of Santa Clara, Calif.




The CPU


204


operates in conjunction with various other circuits such as RAM


208


, ROM


212


, storage device


214


and support circuitry


206


such as co-processors, clock circuits, cache, power supplies and other well known circuits. The operation and interrelationship of the various computer components contained in general purpose computer are well known in the art and do not require further explanation. The display driver


216


may be a video card, printer driver, or other common driver software and hardware as required by the output device


218


.




The RAM


208


stores the software implementation of the present invention, i.e., the etch uniformity derivation routine


124


. Typically, the routines of the invention are stored in the mass storage device


214


and recalled for temporary storage in RAM while being executed by the CPU


204


.





FIG. 3

depicts a flow diagram of the etch uniformity derivation routine


124


of the present invention. The routine begins at step


300


and proceeds to step


301


. At step


301


, a user initializes test parameters, wafer characteristics, and various correlation parameters. Such initialization can be accomplished by entering the information via the computer system input device(s) or by recalling the information from memory. At step


302


, the routine receives OES data from the monochromator module. At step


304


, the routine processes the OES data. This processing averages the data points to produce a smooth data set that, when plotted, would generate a smooth curve representing the magnitude of the OES data versus time. A rolling average is used to include additional data points into the average as the data is available from the monochromator module. Further processing may include data thresholding, spike filtering and the like. The combination of the system initialization and data acquisition steps form a data acquisition module of the invention. An illustrative OES data curve produced by this module is depicted in

FIG. 4

as curve


400


. This curve represents the magnitude of the OES data normalized as a percentage of the full scale of the data acquisition equipment (the right-hand scale) versus time, in seconds.




At step


306


, the routine


124


computes a first derivative of the data. This step of the routine forms a derivative generator that generates the first derivative by taking a pair of sequential and filtered data points and dividing by the time elapsed between those two filtered data points. The routine repeats this computation as each filtered data point is generated by the monochromator module. Symbolically, the first derivative is:








X
2

-

X
1



Δ





T











where X


1


is a first filtered data point, and X


2


is a second filtered data point and ΔT is the time duration between the X


1


and X


2


. ΔT is typically 0.1 seconds. When plotted, the first derivative of the OES data represented by curve


400


shown in

FIG. 4

would appear as curve


402


. Curve


402


represents the first derivative as a change in the full scale percentage (normalized data values) over a specific time duration ΔT (left-hand scale) versus time. The peak of curve


402


indicates the inflection point of the OES data curve


400


.




At step


308


, the routine detects the “trigger point” of the OES data curve. The trigger point is user selected during system initialization in step


302


. This trigger point selection step forms a trigger criterion generator. The trigger point can be any point on the OES data curve; however, the selection is usually the inflection point in the OES data curve or the etch endpoint of the OES data curve. The etch endpoint is generally defined by the parameters selected to control the endpoint software. Specifically, the value of the first derivative of the OES data at the inflection point repeatably correlates with the etch uniformity across the wafer. Furthermore, if the etching process is stopped before the inflection point is reached, the value of the first derivative at the point where etching is halted (i.e., the endpoint) is indicative of the uniformity across the wafer at that point in time.




The correlation between etch uniformity and the magnitude of the first derivative depends upon the test parameters used as well as the wafer characteristics and wafer recipe. Consequently, the test parameters and wafer characteristics are preloaded at step


301


, into the memory of the computer system such that they can be selected by the user at test initiation. Generally, the user will select the present test parameters and wafer characteristics from a menu and a look-up-table associated with those parameters is loaded into memory. The look-up table is a correlation table for values of first derivative and uniformity. The routine, at step


312


, accesses the look-up table containing the uniformity versus first derivative correlation values. The table access process that correlates first derivative values and uniformity values forms a data analyzer. Using this look-up table and given a value of the first derivative, the routine generates a uniformity value for the wafer that corresponds to the wafer characteristics and the test parameters of the present test. Alternatively, a correlation equation is used rather than a look-up table. A graphical representation of an illustrative correlation equation is depicted and described in relation to FIG.


5


.




At step


314


, the routine displays the uniformity value. Alternatively, the uniformity value may be compared to a threshold and, depending upon the uniformity value with respect to the threshold, the routine generates a subjective uniformity term such as uniformity “good” or uniformity “poor”. Optionally, at step


316


, the routine may compare the uniformity value with a plurality of threshold values where, depending on the particular threshold value that is exceeded by the uniformity value, the routine can make suggestions on how to improve the uniformity. For example, for very poor uniformity, the routine may suggest that the user accomplish a preventive maintenance procedure such as cleaning chamber windows, recalibration of the monochromator and the like.





FIG. 5

depicts a graph


500


of etch uniformity (scale


502


) versus normalized first derivative values (scale


504


) corresponding to a particular test parameter and wafer characteristic set. The first derivative values shown are the “peak” values at the inflection point, also known as the “minimum slope” values. In the illustrative graph, for example, an etch process that attains a minimum slope of −2 would have a coefficient of variation (a measure of uniformity) of 2 percent. Given the particular test parameters and the wafer characteristics, a look-up table containing the information in the graph of

FIG. 5

would be used at step


312


of the flow diagram to determine the uniformity given a particular value of first derivatives. Alternatively, a curve fitted to the data points (e.g., curve


506


) is used to derive an equation from which any value of uniformity can be derived from a given minimum slope value. The depicted curve is linear (e.g., having the form Y=M


0


+M


1


X), but other forms of linear and non-linear curves can be fitted to the data.




The film thickness measurements used to generate curve


500


were performed using the Prometrix SM-300 and measuring 49 points with a 6 mm edge exclusion before and after etching. The wafers were 150 mm thermal oxide wafers. The test was conducted within a process chamber containing a pressure of 200 mTorr, the cathode temperature was maintained at 20 degree Celsius and 8 Torr of Helium was provided to cool the backside of the wafer. The chamber was provided a 25 sccm flow of CHF


3


, a 5 sccm flow of CF


4


, and a 75 sccm flow of Ar. The plasma was powered by 750 Watts and a 30 G magnetic containment field was used. The etch non-uniformity is represented in

FIG. 5

using a coefficient of variation, a well-known 1σ uniformity metric. The coefficient of variation (CV) measures variation as a percent of the mean variation and is given by the following ratio:






CV
=

100
*

(

σ
μ

)












where σ is the observed standard deviation of the wafer surface variations and μ is the mean of those variations. The non-uniformity discussed herein is presented as a percentage of the mean.




Besides displaying the uniformity (more correctly, the value that is displayed represents non-uniformity), the routine may control the etch process such that the etching of the wafer is concluded when a particular uniformity is reached and after a particular etch rate has been exceeded, thus providing a means of optimally controlling the wafer etch process.




As discussed above, the invention is a method and apparatus for performing direct, in situ measurement of etch uniformity by monitoring, processing and analyzing OES data. The invention computes the first derivative of the OES data. This first derivative value is repeatably indicative of etch uniformity. As such, the invention produces a display of the etch uniformity value and/or in some manner responds to that value.




Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings.



Claims
  • 1. A method for measuring uniformity of a surface of a wafer as a result of an etching process comprising the steps of:acquiring data indicating etch progression, wherein said data represents an intensity of an emission at a monitored wavelength of light; defining a trigger criterion corresponding to a particular value of said data to form a trigger point; producing, as said data is acquired, a first derivative of said data as a first derivative value, wherein said first derivative value is produced by X2-X1Δ⁢ ⁢Twhere X1 is a data point in said data, and X2 is a data point and ΔT is a time duration elapsed between acquisition of the and data points, said trigger criterion is a peak of said first derivative; andgenerating, when said trigger criterion is attained by said data, a uniformity value representing the uniformity of the surface of the wafer by directly correlating said first derivative value to said uniformity value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said trigger criterion is a value of said data that represent when an endpoint to an etching process has been attained.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said trigger criterion is an inflection point in a curve representing said data.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said generating step comprises the steps of:addressing a look up table using said first derivative value, where said look up table contains uniformity values correlating to first derivative values; and producing a particular uniformity value in response to said first derivative value at said trigger point.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said generating step comprises the step of computing a particular uniformity value that corresponds to said first derivative value at said trigger point, where said particular uniformity is computed using a correlation equation that produces uniformity values corresponding to first derivative values.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of responding to said uniformity value.
US Referenced Citations (31)
Number Name Date Kind
4394237 Donnelly et al. Jul 1983 A
4493745 Chen et al. Jan 1985 A
4602981 Chen et al. Jul 1986 A
4859277 Barna et al. Aug 1989 A
4954212 Gabriel Sep 1990 A
4995939 Ferenczi et al. Feb 1991 A
5014217 Savage May 1991 A
5160402 Cheng Nov 1992 A
5200023 Gifford et al. Apr 1993 A
5288367 Angell et al. Feb 1994 A
5294289 Heinz et al. Mar 1994 A
5308414 O'Neill et al. May 1994 A
5338390 Barbee et al. Aug 1994 A
5347460 Gifford Sep 1994 A
5348889 Terashima et al. Sep 1994 A
5362356 Schoenborn Nov 1994 A
5372673 Stager et al. Dec 1994 A
5392124 Barbee et al. Feb 1995 A
5399229 Stefani et al. Mar 1995 A
5403433 Morrison et al. Apr 1995 A
5445705 Barbee et al. Aug 1995 A
5450205 Sawin et al. Sep 1995 A
5451289 Barbee et al. Sep 1995 A
5456788 Barbee et al. Oct 1995 A
5467883 Frye et al. Nov 1995 A
5472561 Williams et al. Dec 1995 A
5474648 Patrick et al. Dec 1995 A
5573624 Barbee Nov 1996 A
5653894 Ibbotson Aug 1997 A
5658423 Angell Aug 1997 A
5664066 Sun Sep 1997 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Sherwood et al. “Calculus” UCLA pp. 20-21, 1954.*
Wahbi et al. “Ratios of first derivative maxima and compensated derivative absorption curve” Analyst, v. 111, pp. 777-780, 1986.*
Shiga et al. “On line differential converter. . . . ” CA 76:52832, with original article attached, 1971.*
Sherwood et al. “Calculus” UCLA Pubs. pp. 20-21, 1954.*
Shiga et al. “Online differential converter for obtaining the first derivative of absorption spectra” CA 76:52832, 1972.*
Wahbi et al. “Ratios of first derivative maxima and compensted derivative absorption curves” Analyst vo. 111, pp. 777-780, 1986.*
Webster Dictionary, p. 365, 1976.*
Splichal et al., “Application of Chemometrics to Optical Emission Spectroscopy for Plasma Monitoring”, SPIE, vol. 1594, Process Module Metrology, Control, and Clustering, pp. 189-203 (1991).