The invention is related to the field of integrated circuit fabrication, in particular to methods and apparatuses for purging and cleaning process chambers used in the annealing and curing of semiconductor wafers.
As integrated circuit (IC) feature sizes shrink, problems of increased resistance and resistance-capacitance (RC) coupling offset any speed advantage derived from the smaller device size, limiting improvement in device performance. Ways to improve device performance and reliability include using highly conductive metals, such as copper, and employing lower dielectric constant (low-k) materials. The lower the dielectric constant of the dielectric, the lower the capacitance of the dielectric and the lower the RC delay of the IC.
Low k dielectrics are conventionally defined as those materials that have a dielectric constant lower than that of silicon dioxide, that is k<˜4. Typical methods of obtaining low-k materials include doping silicon dioxide with various hydrocarbons or fluorine. These doping methods, however, generally cannot produce materials with dielectric constants lower than about 2.6. With more and more advanced technology needs, present efforts are focused on developing low-k dielectric materials with k less than 2.5. These ultra low-k (ULK) dielectrics can be obtained by incorporating air voids within a low-k dielectric, creating a porous dielectric material.
Methods of fabricating porous dielectrics typically involve forming a composite film (sometimes referred to herein as a “precursor film”) containing two components: a porogen (typically an organic material such as a polymer) and a structure former or dielectric material (e.g., a silicon containing material). Once the composite film is formed on the substrate, the porogen component is removed, leaving a structurally intact porous dielectric matrix. Techniques for removing porogens from the composite film include, for example, a thermal process in which the substrate is heated to a temperature sufficient for the breakdown and vaporization of the organic porogen. These thermal processes, however, have certain difficulties. In particular, substrate temperatures generally need to be high (i.e., greater than about 400° C.) with exposure times typically on the order of hours. As is well known in the field, these conditions can damage copper containing devices.
Methods have been developed to form a porous low-k or ultra-low-k (ULK) film of dielectric material by first forming a precursor film that contains a porogen and a structure former, or “backbone”, on a substrate, and then exposing the precursor film to ultra-violet radiation (UV) in a curing process to remove the porogen. The method is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/115,576 filed Apr. 26, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,137,465 on Mar. 20, 2012, and having the title “Single Chamber Sequential Curing of Semiconductor Wafers”, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
The porogens evolved from low-k and ULK dielectric films in a UV curing chamber during a curing process tend to form porogen deposits on internal chamber parts and a quartz window through which ultraviolet curing (UVC) light is transmitted into a curing chamber. The resulting porogen deposit may become a source of particle contamination and a visual blemish. Deposits on the quartz window inhibit UVC light transmission and thus limit the number of wafers processed between chamber and window cleans.
Porogen is outgassed during UV curing of ULK film and may deposit on a window or other internal chamber parts. Accumulated porogen in the chamber may contaminate wafers. Porogen accumulation in a UV-cure chamber is reduced by removing outgassed porogen through an outlet while purge gas is flowed across a window through which a wafer is exposed to UV light. A purge ring having specific major and minor exhaust to inlet area ratios may be made of flame polished quartz. The reduction in porogen accumulation improves throughput and cost by allowing more wafers to be processed between chamber cleans and/or to reduce the duration of chamber cleans. One improvement in chamber cleans is to direct the cleaning gas and the porogen-laden gas at the same specific chamber location for more effective cleans.
In one aspect, the invention pertains to a UV cure chamber for curing porogen containing ULK film. The chamber includes one or more cure stations. Each station includes a window having two sides, a UV light source mounted on one side of the window, a wafer support exposed to the UV source that is positioned on the other side of the window, and an inlet and outlet for purge gas positioned across from each other on the wafer support side of the window.
The major outlet to inlet surface area ratio is greater than about 4, 5, or is about 6 for at least one station. As used in this disclosure, the major outlet surface area is an imaginary combined sectional surface area perpendicular to the wafer plane of all features of any geometry that are used for exhausting gases. Note that while the imaginary surface is perpendicular to the wafer plane, the actual hardware need not be. The major inlet surface area is the combined inlet sectional surface area of all features of any geometry that serve as final restrictions on the inlet path of a gas. These surface areas may be calculated using an imaginary surface that is perpendicular to the direction of gas flow. The surface need not be planar.
The minor outlet to inlet surface area ratio is greater than about 2, 2.5 or is about 3. The minor outlet surface area is a cross sectional area of primary gas exhaust opening used to remove gases from the purge system. The minor inlet surface area is the cross sectional area of primary gas delivery opening that serves the purge system. The purge system is connected between the gas delivery and exhaust system. A purge system is typically composed of gas inlet and outlet features that are designed to remove process byproducts, e.g., outgassed porogens, from a process chamber and prevent accumulation of process byproducts on all internal process chamber surfaces and direct flow cleaning gases. Typically, the minor outlet and inlet surface areas are the connections to gas delivery and exhaust systems.
The ratios of outlet to inlet may also be viewed in terms of a perimeter surrounding a plane of a cylindrical space bounded by the window and the wafer support. Purge gas is flowed from one side of the perimeter and exhausted from the other side. The inlet portions may span over 50% or over 75% of this perimeter around the wafer support. If the sum of all purge features regardless of feature geometry are considered to take up 100% of the perimeter of the purge system, then the exhaust features takes less than half of the perimeter, preferably less than 25% of the perimeter.
The purge system connects to a gas delivery system and a gas exhaust system, and includes a purge ring, also referred to as an open exhaust baffle. The baffle includes an upper and a lower portion. The upper and lower portions are assembled to provide the inlet and outlet openings for purge gas. The baffle may also include a quartz insert on the inlet side, a heater on the outlet side, and a shield on the outlet side. The heater is configured to heat chamber materials around the outlet, e.g., the baffle and the shield, to at least about 100° C. or 120° C. The heater may also heat other surrounding chamber materials, e.g., chamber walls and the gas exhaust system. The quartz insert and portions of the baffle forming the outlet may be made of a flame polished quartz and may have a surface polish roughness average of between about 4 and 63 angstroms, between about 4 and 32 angstroms, or between around 4 to 14 angstroms. Portions of the baffle may be coated with a UV absorbing material.
In certain embodiments, the chamber has four stations. Although every station includes the purge ring or baffle, not every station has a heater or shield. The major and minor outlet to inlet surface area ratios and perimeter dimensions may apply to one or more of the stations, not necessarily all. Because UV light is applied to the same wafer sequentially as the wafer indexes from station to station and porogen removals occurs early during the UV exposure, most of the porogen outgassing is expected to occur in the first few stations. These first few stations are configured with baffles particularly suited to removing outgassed porogens. In certain embodiments, the exhaust for the last station is reduced to increase purge gas flow in the other stations.
In certain embodiments, the chamber has only one or two stations. According to these embodiments, the stations are configured with gas inlet and exhaust features that remove porogen outgassed from the chamber. The exhaust feature may encompass less than 50% of a perimeter of the purge system, preferably less than 25% of the purge system.
In another aspect, the invention pertains to an apparatus for removing chemical species from a partially fabricated semiconductor wafer. The apparatus includes a curing chamber, a wafer support located in the curing chamber for holding a wafer, and a purge ring located in the curing chamber positioned between the wafer support and a window. The purge ring includes an inlet portion, an inlet plenum located in the inlet portion, an inlet baffle located in the inlet portion, an outlet portion, a heater located in the outlet portion and configured to heat the outlet portion, and an outlet channel located in the outlet portion. The inlet plenum is fluidly connectable to a gas source, preferably a purge gas source of nitrogen, argon, helium, or a mixture of these. The outlet channel is located substantially opposite the inlet baffle across the purge ring. A ring hole space is defined at least partially by the edges of inlet and outlet portions. The inlet baffle is operable to convey gas from the inlet plenum into the ring hole space, and the outlet portion is operable to convey gas and other matter out of the ring hole space. The major outlet to inlet surface area ratio may be greater than about 4. The minor outlet to inlet surface area ratio may be greater than about 2.
In yet another aspect, the present invention pertains to a method to remove outgassed porogen from a UV chamber. The method includes providing a purge ring having an inlet and an outlet area, heating the outlet area, and flowing an inert gas from a gas inlet across an underside of a window to the heated outlet area. The inert gas may be any of the commonly used inert gas, e.g., nitrogen, argon, helium, or a combination of these. The inert gas may be flowed between 4 and 100 slm (standard liters per minute) for a four-station chamber and have a residence time of less than about 125 seconds.
The outlet area may be heated to at least 100° C. It is believed that a heated outlet area reduces outgassed porogen deposits. Deposited porogen may be removed by flowing oxygen plasma or ozone to the chamber through the inlet and outlet areas. Also, ozone may be formed in situ by irradiating oxygen flowed into the chamber with UV light. The resulting ozone then cleans the window and other chamber areas.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific embodiments are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or by using alternate elements or processes. In other instances well-known processes, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
In this application, the terms “substrate” and “wafer” will be used interchangeably. The following detailed description assumes the invention is implemented on semiconductor processing equipment. However, the invention is not so limited. The apparatus may be utilized to process work pieces of various shapes, sizes, and materials. In addition to semiconductor wafers, other work pieces that may take advantage of this invention include various articles such as display face planes, printed circuit boards, solar cell wafers, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), and the like.
Introduction
UV treatment of semiconductor wafers has many applications including removing porogens, strengthening dielectric films, repairing damage to low k films, stabilizing FSG films, improving hermeticity and selectivity of SiC etch stop films, curing nitrides and oxides, extracting water produced in dielectric (e.g., silicon oxide) deposition, densification of dielectric materials, and increasing stress in dielectric films (for, e.g., strained gates). UV curing has also been employed to lower the k-value of other dielectric materials such as oxides deposited by pulse deposition layer (PDL) processes.
For example, as device geometry shrinks, integrated circuits (IC) require dielectric films with smaller capacitance values. IC manufacturers have obtained low capacitance by inducing porosity in these dielectric films. Inclusion of porosity in dielectric films is accomplished by co-depositing the backbone dielectric material (typically an organo-silicate glass or OSG) with a pore generator (typically an organic material). However, inducing this kind of porosity causes degradation in the mechanical properties of the film, reducing its ability to sustain subsequent integration steps without mechanical damage. After the deposition, the pore generator (porogen) must be removed from the ULK precursor film, and the backbone dielectric material strengthened for further processing. UV radiation can be used to achieve both the porogen removal and the strengthening of the backbone dielectric material. The UV radiation drives out the porogen from the dielectric film and rearranges the bond structure in the residual material to strengthen it and to render it capable of sustaining subsequent processing. The cured film may have an ultra-low dielectric constant (k) of about 2-2.5.
The curing of semiconductor wafers takes place in a chamber that may or may not be in a vacuum. A wafer is placed in the chamber and exposed to UV radiation. The process of curing ultra-low k (ULK) films on semiconductors can be time-consuming with cure times of up to twenty minutes. In multi-station ultraviolet processes, the porogen removal step tends to occur first, followed by the cross-link strengthening of the ULK film. The porogens are hydrocarbons that may deposit onto chamber interior walls, windows and other reactor parts. Porogens tend to outgas from the wafer in the first one or two stations, and outgas less or very little in latter stations. The porogen must be cleaned from the reactor periodically to avoid clouding the window through which the ultra-violet radiation enters the stations and/or depositing unwanted particles on the chamber internals walls and parts which can delaminate and contaminate the wafer.
Apparatus
The reactor 107 in the depicted wafer processing tool has four stations, numbered from 1 to 4. Each station is capable of performing ultraviolet radiation treatment simultaneously with the other stations. The wafer is indexed through the reactor stations using wafer indexing mechanism 109, which may include carrier rings and a spindle. At the end of processing at each station, the wafer is indexed to the next station for further processing. At the end of processing, the wafer is returned to station 1. The wafer then leaves the reactor through a transfer port to a loadlock 105a or 105b, where the wafer is cooled on the cooling pedestal before finally returning to the cassette in the pod 101. Because there are two loadlocks 105a and 105b, either one can be used for egress or ingress to the reactor, or both. In this particular wafer processing tool configuration, the only wafer access to the reactor 107 is through station 1, though in other configurations the loadlocks may access different stations.
Because the wafers are indexed from station to station at the same time, the amount of time each wafer spends at each station is the same. The UV cure time at each station would be a fraction of the total cure time required. In a four-station reactor, the cure time in the first station would be about ¼ of the total cure time. The stations in the multistation chamber shown in
In the case of ULK UV treatment, more of the porogen removal occurs in the initial stages of the UV radiation. Without a purge system, the porogen removed would deposit on surrounding surfaces, including the window and internal chamber parts. Techniques for forming low-k and ULK dielectric thin films are known in the art. A porogen-containing dielectric ULK precursor is formed by co-depositing the porogen with “backbone” materials. A preferred class of porogens includes polyfunctional cyclic non-aromatic compounds. Typical “backbone” precursor compounds include silane, alkylsilanes, alkoxysilanes, and siloxanes. Co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/672,311, filed Sep. 26, 2003, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,389 on Apr. 24, 2007, and having the title “Method of Porogen Removal from Porous Low-k Films Using UV Radiation.”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes, teaches systems and methods of depositing porogen-containing thin films and curing the thin films using UV radiation to form low-k dielectric material.
Outgassed porogen from the wafer may deposit on the surrounding chamber parts, e.g., the interior surface of the window 209, internal chamber walls 201, underside of a top plate 211, and surfaces of the pedestal 203. As shown in
A gas delivery system 231 delivers gas from sources 233, 235, and 237 to the chamber. Suitable purge gas may include nitrogen, argon, helium, or a combination of two or more of these. Gas sources 233 and 235 may include a single gas that is later mixed into a desired mixture or may include mixed sources. Gas source 237 also serves as a source for the remote plasma clean module 241. The purge gas or mixture may be heated through inline heater or heat exchanger 239 before entering the chamber at inlet 213. The flow path of the purge gas is indicated by arrows 217.
The purge gas enters the chamber top 211 at inlet 213, and enters the purge ring 225 at inlet opening 223. The purge ring includes an inlet portion 227 and an outlet portion 229. The purge gas flows through inlet portion 227 into a ring hole space 243 between the window 209 and the wafer 205. The purge gas then flows into the outlet portion 229 and exits the purge ring at the outlet opening 245 and the chamber top at outlet 215 to a vacuum source 247.
During UV curing of a wafer deposited with a ULK structure former and a porogen, the radiation energy from the UV light dissociates the porogen and liberates the porogen or portions of porogen from the structure former. The volatile porogen, usually hydrocarbons, enters a purge space 255 directly above the wafer. As the purge gas flows through purge ring hole space 243, the purge gas carries the outgassed porogen along to the outlet portion and exits the chamber. The outgassed porogen may deposit on internal chamber surfaces, e.g., bottom surface 253 of the top plate, internal side of window 209, and underside surfaces of the inlet portion 227 and outlet portion 229.
During chamber clean, oxygen or another cleaning gas, flows from source 237 into the remote plasma clean module 241 and into the chamber top at inlet 213. Alternately, ozone may be formed by pumping oxygen directly into the inlet 213 and flowing it across the lamps which turns some of it into ozone used for cleaning. From there the cleaning gas follows the same path as the purge gas to exit the enclosure at outlet 215. The cleaning gas reacts with deposited porogen to remove it from chamber materials. In certain embodiments, the cleaning gas also exits the enclosure from a bottom pump out port 249 at all times during the clean, for portions of the clean time, or not at all. It is believed that more effective cleaning of certain areas of the chamber, notably the areas at or below the wafer plane is achieved by pumping out the cleaning gas from port 249.
In some embodiments, a heater 317 is coupled to an outlet portion of the purge ring. The heater 317 serves to heat a portion of the purge ring. Although the purge gas itself may be heated to 200° C. or higher, the purge ring temperature may be much less. Higher temperature porogen may more readily deposit onto the colder outlet portion. It is believed that heating the outlet portion of the purge ring reduces outgassed porogen deposits. The heater is not limited to the design shown. Any kind of heater that is capable of maintaining the outlet portion at about 100° C. or higher may be used. In certain embodiments, a heater shield 319 is used in conjunction with heater 317. The heater shield 319 is attached to the upper baffle to further improve the flow dynamics of the purge gas through the ring hole space. The heater shield is also actively or passively heated to prevent the accumulation of porogen on itself and the areas it covers. The heater shield may be made of quartz or another material suitable for use inside a process chamber in a UV environment. One side of the shield preferably is shaped to conform to the surrounding chamber parts while other side by which the purge gas flows, is preferably shaped to improve the flow dynamics of the purge gas and direct the purge gas toward the outlet. For example, the purge gas flow side may be very smooth and having a shape designed to reduce drag. The average surface roughness of between about 4 and 63 angstroms, between about 4 and 32 angstroms, or between around 4 to 14 angstroms.
In certain embodiments, the baffle material at the outlet portion may be made of a highly polished material so that the outgassed porogen is less likely to deposit thereon. The highly polished material may be a highly polished quartz or other material. The material may be made of flame-polished quartz and may have average surface roughness of between about 4 and 63 angstroms, between about 4 and 32 angstroms, or between around 4 to 14 angstroms.
A particular feature of the purge ring involves its dimensions. A purge ring having a major outlet to inlet surface area ratio greater than about 4, 5, or is about 6 is found to be particularly effective at reducing deposits. This major outlet to inlet surface area ratio preferably applies for at least one station in a multi-station chamber.
A purge system is typically composed of gas inlet and outlet features that are designed to remove process byproducts, e.g., outgassed porogens, from a process chamber and prevent accumulation of process byproducts on all internal process chamber surfaces and direct flow of cleaning gases. The purge system is a part of the chamber that connects to a gas delivery system, such as item 231 of
The purge system may be defined relative to the minor outlet to inlet surface area ratio.
The purge system may also be defined in terms of a perimeter surrounding a plane of a cylindrical space bounded by the window and the wafer support. The portion of the perimeter used by outlet and inlets may be defined by a ratio. Purge gas is flowed from one side of the perimeter and exhausted from the other side. The inlet portions may span over 50% or over 75% of this perimeter around the wafer support. If the sum of all purge features regardless of feature geometry are considered to take up 100% of the perimeter of the purge system, then the exhaust features takes less than half of the perimeter, preferably less than 25% of the perimeter. Note that this ratio is opposite of the major and minor surface area ratios as discussed above. The outlet surface areas tend to be larger than the inlet surface areas, both as defined for major and minor surface areas. The outlet perimeter, on the other hand, may be smaller than the inlet perimeter.
Each station in a multi-station chamber may be configured differently as to the heater, heater shield, and the dimensions of outlet and inlet surface areas. As discussed above, in a four station chamber, porogen outgassing tends to occur in the first few stations. Thus, the first one or two or three stations have a greater need for purge gas flow and heating. In certain embodiments, the first two stations may be configured with outlet portion heating, heat shield, quartz insert, and a purge ring having dimensions for maximum purge gas flow and flow characteristics. Another station may be configured without one or more of these features because of the reduced likelihood of porogen outgassing. Yet another station may not be configured with any of the features in order to maximize purge gas flow in the other stations.
Process Flow
A purge ring having an inlet and an outlet portion is provided in operation 601 in a UV-cure chamber. As discussed above, UV curing is a semiconductor processing method used in various stages of semiconductor manufacturing. A UV-cure chamber may be used to perform one or more of other processes where outgassing is not a concern. When porogen removal is required, then the purge ring may be provided in the chamber.
A wafer having deposited ULK precursor film is provided in a UV exposure area. These following operations may overlap or even occur simultaneously. One or more of the operations may continue even if the wafer has been removed. In operation 603, a wafer is exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation to remove porogen. This is the operation that outgases the porogen. At around the same time, an inert gas is flowed from an inlet or an outlet of a purge ring, in operation 605. The purge ring is associated with a wafer processing station. The inert gas may be nitrogen, argon, helium, or a combination of these. Preferably, the inert gas is flowed during the entire exposure operation or during when outgassed porogen is present. The inert gas may be flowed between 4 and 100 slm (standard liters per minute) for a four-station chamber and have a residence time of less than about 125 seconds. The inert gas may be heated prior to the inlet. In certain cases, the inert gas is heated to about 200° C.
A portion of the purge ring around the outlet is heated in operation 606. The outlet portion is heated to and maintained at higher than 100° C., or to at least 120° C. It is believed that a heated outlet reduces porogen deposits on chamber surfaces. The heating of the outlet portion may occur before the wafer is exposed to UV light. The outlet portion preferably is maintained at an elevated temperature during porogen outgassing, which may occur soon after the onset of UV curing.
After the UV exposure, the wafer may be transferred to a transfer chamber in operation 607 or to the next station in operation 609. As discussed above, a multi-station chamber may include two or stations for sequential processing of wafers. Each wafer proceeds sequentially to each station while other wafers are simultaneously processed at different stations. If a multi-station chamber is used, then the wafer may be transferred to the next station for further processing. If the last station was reached or if the chamber has only one station, then the wafer may be transferred to a transfer chamber.
After a defined interval, a decision is made whether the station needs cleaning, in operation 611. This decision may be made based on a loss of UV transmission through the window, the number of wafers processed, elapsed time, the total time of UV exposure, the thickness of film processed, output of a detector, or other variables. The decision may be made by an operator or a computer programmed with instructions to keep track of the defined interval. If the station does not need cleaning, then the process repeats from operations 603, 605, and 606. If the station needs cleaning, then a cleaning procedure is initiated.
Deposited porogen may be removed by flowing remotely generated cleaning gas to the chamber. A cleaning gas may be remotely generated or generated in situ. (see operation 613 and 616). A remote plasma generator may use oxygen to generate oxygen plasma as the cleaning gas. Alternatively, ozone may be produced via a generator and flowed in through the baffle inlet. Ozone for cleaning may be created in situ in the baffle by flowing oxygen into the inlet and using the UV lamps to make ozone as shown in operations 614 and 616. The cleaning gas is flowed to the inlet, where it may follow the same flow path as the purge gas or in some cases flow out of the chamber from a bottom pumping port. Note that the chamber cleaning occurs with no wafers in the chamber.
The cleaning gas may be flowed to one or more stations or all of the stations in a multi-station chamber. The cleaning gas removes deposited porogen from internal chamber surfaces. In certain embodiments, the cleaning gas follows a different flow path from the purge gas. Instead of flowing out through the outlet (operation 617), the cleaning gas may optionally exit the chamber through a bottom port (operation 619), shown as item 249 in
Results
Implementations of the features of the present invention resulted increased interval between chamber cleans and the duration of the chamber clean. These improvements increase throughput.
In a comparative example, maximum batch sizes of 75 wafers can be processed between chamber cleans. The total clean time was about one hour, consisting of 20 minutes of remote plasma clean at a pressure of 1 Torr and a flowrate of 12 SLM, followed by a 40 minute in-situ clean with Oxygen gas at 700 Torr and 50 SLM.
In a first example, a batch of 75 wafers containing ULK film was exposed to UV light for 2.5 minutes each, with the outlet portion heated to about 120° C. The chamber was cleaned with 15 minute remote plasma clean at a pressure of 1 Torr and a flowrate of 8 SLM, followed by a 15 minute in-situ clean with Oxygen gas at 700 Torr and 30 SLM in a four-station chamber. The in-situ clean uses UV light from the lamps to convert oxygen gas flowing into the chamber into ozone (O3). The ozone reacts with the accumulated porogen, removing it from the window and chamber surfaces. In this example, a heater, a heat shield, and a quartz insert at the inlet were used.
In a second example, bottom pumping was used during remote plasma cleaning A batch of 75 wafers containing ULK film was exposed to UV light for 2.5 minutes each, with the outlet portion heated to about 120° C. The chamber was cleaned with 5 minute remote plasma clean at a pressure of 1 Torr and a flowrate of 8 SLM, followed by a 15 minute in-situ clean with Oxygen gas at 700 Torr and 30 SLM in a four-station chamber. In this example, a heater, a heat shield, and a quartz insert at the inlet were used. The total cleaning time was the same as the first example, but the remote plasma clean time is reduced, resulting in reduced cost.
Both of these examples show dramatic improvement from the comparative example. The total cleaning time is reduced from about one hour to about 30 minutes. For a typical processing time of 2.5 minutes per wafer, the resultant improvement in throughput is 5 wafers per hour, an improvement of approximately 11%. Porogen buildup is significantly reduced in the areas of the chamber above the wafer plane and significantly reduced in areas at or below the wafer plane when inspected before clean. Porogen remaining in the areas of the chamber above the wafer plane can be completely removed in the clean process, whereas without this invention, large, thick deposits remain in the exhaust areas of the chamber and the areas of the top plate near the exhaust after a clean of any duration. Areas of the chamber at and below the wafer plane show visible reduction in remaining porogen accumulation post-clean.
Although various details have been omitted for clarity's sake, various design alternatives may be implemented. For example, the apparatus and methods discussed in this disclosure applies not only to porogen removal, but all UV processing where compounds may be outgassed and need to be removed from the chamber. Therefore, the present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/132,559, filed Jun. 3, 2008, and having the title “Methods and Apparatuses for Reducing Porogen Accumulation From a UV-Cure Chamber,” filed Jun. 3, 2008, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,398,816 on Mar. 19, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/391,134 (now abandoned), filed Mar. 28, 2006, and having the titled “PURGING OF POROGEN FROM UV CURE CHAMBERS, Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber”; this application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/562,421, filed Jul. 31, 2012, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,518,210 on Aug. 27, 2013, and titled “Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber,” which is itself a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/586,175, filed Sep. 18, 2009, titled “Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber,” and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,768 on Oct. 9, 2012, which is itself a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/391,134 (now abandoned), filed Mar. 28, 2006, and titled “Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber,” which claims benefit of priority from Provisional U.S. Patent No. 60/742,844, filed Dec. 5, 2005, and titled “Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber”; all of which the above-listed prior applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3504181 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3704219 | McDowell | Nov 1972 | A |
4527620 | Pedersen et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4563589 | Scheffer | Jan 1986 | A |
4654226 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4832777 | Davis et al. | May 1989 | A |
4872947 | Wang et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4927786 | Nishida | May 1990 | A |
4956582 | Bourassa | Sep 1990 | A |
5005519 | Egermeier et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5049739 | Okamoto | Sep 1991 | A |
5150253 | Watanuki et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5166101 | Lee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5174881 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178682 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195045 | Keane et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5240746 | O'Connell Litteral | Aug 1993 | A |
5282121 | Bornhorst et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288684 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298939 | Swanson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314538 | Maeda et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354715 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5407524 | Patrick et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413664 | Yagi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426076 | Moghadam et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5518959 | Jang et al. | May 1996 | A |
5552927 | Wheatly et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556549 | Patrick et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558717 | Zhao et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5667592 | Boitnott et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674783 | Jang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5795448 | Hurwitt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5833290 | Curelop et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5962085 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5994678 | Zhao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015503 | Butterbaugh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044329 | Kidd | Mar 2000 | A |
6080965 | Osawa | Jun 2000 | A |
6143063 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6232248 | Shinriki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235112 | Satoh | May 2001 | B1 |
6239018 | Liu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242717 | Sanderson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244575 | Vaartstra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259061 | Osawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284050 | Shi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288493 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291800 | Shirakawa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6394797 | Sugaya et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6467491 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475854 | Narwanker et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497783 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519036 | Hickman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524389 | Katayama et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530380 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563092 | Shrinivasan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568346 | Pu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6629012 | Riley et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6756085 | Waldfried et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6821906 | Wada et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6900413 | Ratliff et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7018479 | Goodwin | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020238 | Kantonen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025831 | Butterbaugh et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7067819 | Janik | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7087497 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094713 | Niu et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7097712 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7160813 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7169256 | Dhindsa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176144 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7214630 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7244672 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256111 | Lopatin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264676 | Lai et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7301148 | Johnson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304302 | Nunan et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7327948 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7332445 | Lukas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7394067 | Soltz et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7453560 | Miyake | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7638780 | Kilburn et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642205 | Timans | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7704894 | Henry et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7772527 | Choi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790243 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7935940 | Smargiassi | May 2011 | B1 |
7941039 | Shrinivasan et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7960297 | Rivkin et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7993937 | Chen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8058181 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8075789 | Littau et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8137465 | Shrinivasan et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8211510 | Varadarajan et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8246778 | Lu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8282768 | Smargiassi et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8283644 | Smargiassi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8398816 | Gytri et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8454750 | Shrinivasan et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8512818 | Varadarajan et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8518210 | Smargiassi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8629068 | Shrinivasan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8734663 | Smargiassi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010018267 | Shinriki et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020017242 | Hamaguchi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020117109 | Hazelton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020134439 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020148563 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170484 | Katamine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013280 | Yamanaka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015669 | Janos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030150560 | Kinnard et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030194493 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199603 | Walker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200931 | Goodwin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040023513 | Aoyama et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025787 | Selbrede et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082163 | Mori et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096593 | Lukas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040221871 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266214 | Suguro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006916 | Mantz | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016687 | Shinriki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050056369 | Lai et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072716 | Quiles et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085094 | Yoo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098553 | Devine et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050190248 | Konno et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196929 | Yuan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050255712 | Kato et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263719 | Ohdaira et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050264218 | Dhindsa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021568 | Matsumoto | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074153 | Boisseau et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105106 | Balseanu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060216839 | Shemesh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060269693 | Balseanu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070034159 | Komino et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070134821 | Thakur | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070196011 | Cox et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218204 | Garg et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080053615 | Sago et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080286697 | Verhaverbeke et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059406 | Powers et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100055904 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100267231 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110070665 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120091097 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120161021 | Smargiassi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130160946 | Smargiassi et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130284087 | Gytri et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298940 | Smargiassi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140080324 | Shrinivasan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63307740 | Dec 1988 | JP |
01-107519 | Apr 1989 | JP |
05-031735 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05-138658 | Jun 1993 | JP |
62-229833 | Oct 1997 | JP |
11214364 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-104776 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2007-194582 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2000-0043888 | Jul 2000 | KR |
2006104583 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006127463 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579, filed Feb. 10, 2012, entitled “Single-Chamber Sequential Curing of Semiconductor Wafers.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834, filed Nov. 20, 2006, entitled “Ultra Violet Light Treatment Load Lock for Dielectric Films.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695, filed Mar. 20, 2007, entitled “Multi-Station Sequential Curing of Dielectric Films.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348, filed Dec. 10, 2007, entitled “Tunable-Illumination Reflector Optics for UV Cure System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559, filed Jun. 3, 2008, entitled “Methods and Apparatuses for Reducing Porogen Accumulation from a UV-Cure Chamber.” |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/391,134, filed Mar. 28, 2006, entitled “Purging of Porogen from UV Cure Chamber.” |
US Final Office Action, dated Jun. 9, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 22, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 3, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 2, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 17, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 22, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 1, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 15, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 1, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 9, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 14, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/115,576. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 23, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579. |
US Office Action, dated May 21, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 3, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 11, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Final Office Action, dated Dec. 31, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 23, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Final Office Action, dated Feb. 1, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 14, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jun. 21, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 4, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
US Office Action, dated May 31, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
US Office Action, dated May 20, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 25, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348. |
US Final Office Action, dated Aug. 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 5, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/001,348. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 17, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,149. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 19, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,149. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 7, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,306. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 22, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
US Final Office Action, dated Jul. 12, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 25, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,694, filed May 3, 2013, entitled “Multi-Station Sequential Curing of Dielectric Films.” |
U.S. Office Action, dated Jun. 4, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 14, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Office Action (Ex Parte Quayle), dated Jul. 19, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,694. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,694. |
U.S. Office Action, dated Mar. 6, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Final Office Action, dated Aug. 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/897,838. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 2, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/897,838. |
U.S. Office Action, dated Jan. 3, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,051. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,051. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 11, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,559. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,540, filed Aug. 23, 2013, entitled “Exhaust Flow Spreading Baffle-Riser to Optimize Remote Plasma Window Clean.” |
U.S. Final Office Action, dated Jan. 27, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579. |
U.S. Office Action, dated Apr. 25, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 25, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,579. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130284087 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60742844 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11391134 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12586175 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12132559 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13776527 | US | |
Parent | 12586175 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13562421 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11391134 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12132559 | US | |
Parent | 13776527 | US | |
Child | 12132559 | US | |
Parent | 13562421 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 13776527 | US |