The invention relates to an e-beam lithography process and more particularly to a low-energy e-beam lithography process.
E-beam lithography (or “electron-beam lithography”) is a micro- and nano-fabrication process that consists in depositing a resist on the surface of a substrate, in exposing the resist to an electron beam so as to cause therein localized chemical and physical modifications, then in developing the resist, i.e. selectively removing its exposed portions (a “positive” resist is then spoken of) or unexposed portions (“negative” resist) in order to lay bare the subjacent regions of the substrate. A geometric pattern is therefore transferred to the resist by the electron beam; it may subsequently be transferred to the substrate through the apertures produced in the resist layer.
With respect to photolithography, e-beam lithography allows higher resolutions to be achieved, because diffraction effects are much less pronounced. Specifically, in e-beam lithography resolution is mainly limited by scattering of electrons in the resist and their backscatter by the substrate. The point spread function (PSF) allows these effects to be quantified; it is typically expressed by the following equation:
where:
For example, it may be that α=17 nm, β=288.3 nm and η=0.35.
To minimize the spread of the PSF, electron beams of energy comprised between 50 keV and 100 keV are generally used. However, the use of such high energies causes heating, and therefore thermal deformation, of the substrate. This adversely affects the precision of the transfer of the geometric pattern. To avoid this effect, it has been proposed to use low-energy electrons—typically of 5 to 10 keV—that nevertheless have a sufficient penetration depth (of about 300 nm). However, under these conditions, the electrons undergo a substantial amount of scattering, this limiting the achievable spatial resolution.
It has also been proposed, in order to decrease the spread of the PSF, to insert an intermediate layer of low atomic density between the resist and the substrate, see for example document FR 2 994 489.
The invention aims to remedy the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art. More particularly, it aims to improve the spatial resolution of e-beam lithography, and in particular of low-energy e-beam lithography.
According to the invention, this aim is achieved by virtue of prior implantation of electrons into the substrate—or into a dielectric layer deposited on its surface. These electrons are spatially distributed so as to generate a repulsive electric field that opposes the scattering of the electrons used in the actual lithography step.
One subject of the invention is therefore an e-beam lithography process comprising the following steps:
implanting into a substrate, or into a dielectric layer deposited on the surface of said substrate, electrons in a first pattern;
depositing an e-beam resist on the surface of said substrate or of said sacrificial dielectric layer; and
exposing said resist by means of an electron beam in a second pattern, then developing said resist;
said first and second patterns being made up of elementary patterns, the elementary patterns of said first pattern at least partially surrounding the elementary patterns of said second pattern.
Other features, details and advantages of the invention will become apparent on reading the description given with reference to the appended drawings, which are given by way of example and show, respectively:
The figures are not to scale.
Electrons are implanted in the layer CD by means of an electron beam FEI, in an elementary geometric pattern MPI the characteristics of which will be discussed below. This step is illustrated in
Next, as illustrated in
It may be seen in
After they have passed through the layer, the electrons EFL reach the substrate, where they rapidly recombine with the holes T accumulated at the substrate-dielectric layer interface. This rapid recombination decreases the fraction η of backscattered electrons and therefore contributes to limiting the spread of the PSF. This effect does not occur if the substrate is insulating.
The implanted charge dose and the geometry of the implantation pattern MPI may be optimized by means of numerical simulations taking into account the scattering of the electrons EFL in the resist and in the substrate, and the influence of the electric field generated by the trapped electrons EP and the holes T. In the case of a disk-shaped elementary lithography pattern ML and of an implantation pattern MPI of circular annulus shape, there are only three parameters to be optimized: the implanted dose, the spacing between the pattern ML and the pattern MPI (shown by d1 in
The subsequent steps of the process are conventional: the exposed resist is developed, so as to obtain an aperture in correspondence with the lithography pattern ML—if the resist is positive—or its complement—if the resist is negative (
Of course, in actual applications the implantation pattern and the lithography pattern will be made up of a large number of elementary patterns such as those shown in the figures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1651541 | Feb 2016 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/053749 | 2/20/2017 | WO | 00 |