The present disclosure relates generally to semiconductor devices, and more particularly to methods for forming shallow trench isolation (STI) stressor structures in MOSFET devices to enhance their performance.
The use of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers in making MOSFET devices has become common in the art. In an SOI wafer, a semiconductor layer is provided which is disposed over a buried oxide (BOX) layer. SOI MOSFET transistors offer improvements over bulk MOSFET transistors in terms of circuit speed, reductions in chip power consumption, and in channel-length scaling. These advantages arise at least in part from the decreased junction capacitance made possible by the presence of a dielectric layer under the active semiconductor region.
The use of a thin layer of strained silicon in the channel layer of MOSFET devices has also been found to improve the performance characteristics of these devices. The presence of strain in the channel layer causes the individual silicon atoms within that layer to be forced farther apart or closer together in their lattice structure than would be the case in the unstrained material. The larger or smaller lattice spacing results in a change in the electronic band structure of the device such that current carriers (i.e., electrons and holes) have higher mobilities within the channel layer, thereby resulting in higher currents in the transistor and faster circuit speeds.
The use of strained silicon in SOI MOSFETs combines the advantages of these two features. Thus, in SOI MOSFETs, the presence of a buried insulator can drastically reduce parasitic capacitance, while the use of a strained silicon channel in a MOSFET enhances the drive current of the device. However, the use of strained silicon channels in SOI MOSFETs offers additional advantages over the use of such channels in bulk MOSFETs. Thus, in bulk MOSFETs, strained silicon channels are typically formed on a thick layer of SiGe, so the source and drain junctions are formed within the SiGe layer. Since SiGe has a lower energy gap and higher dielectric constant, this leads to higher junction capacitances and junction leakage. By contrast, when a strained silicon channel is formed in an SOI structure, the increased junction capacitance and leakage associated with SiGe are mitigated by the SOI structure, and thus are less detrimental to transistor performance.
Despite the aforementioned advantages, the fabrication of SOI MOSFETs with strained silicon channels is beset by certain challenges. For example, during the processing of an SOI wafer in the fabrication of SOI MOSFET devices, the vertical sidewalls of the active silicon layer are often damaged by the etching process used to pattern the silicon. To address this issue, manufacturers sometimes grow an oxide liner on the vertical sidewalls of the active silicon layer. The oxide liner is beneficial in that it improves or rebuilds the sidewalls of the active silicon layer. However, the thermal growth process used to form the oxide liner tends to induce the formation of bird's beak structures, which can exert compressive stress in the channel region of the active silicon. Various methods have been developed in the art to avoid or minimize the formation of these structures. Most of these methods are undesirable in that they add to the process complexity of the fabrication of SOI MOSFETs.
In one aspect, a method for making a semiconductor device is provided herein. In accordance with the method, a substrate is provided which comprises an active semiconductor layer disposed on a buried dielectric layer. A trench is created in the substrate which exposes a portion of the buried dielectric layer. An oxide layer is formed over the surfaces of the trench, and at least one polysilicon stressor structure is formed over the oxide layer.
In another aspect, a method for making a semiconductor device is provided. In accordance with the method, a substrate is provided which comprises an active semiconductor layer disposed on a buried dielectric layer. A trench is created in the substrate which exposes a portion of the buried dielectric layer, and a nitride layer is formed over the surfaces of the trench. The trench is backfilled with an oxide, and the oxide is subjected to densification at a maximum densification temperature of less than about 1050° C.
These and other aspects of the present disclosure are described in greater detail below.
It has now been found that the performance characteristics of a MOSFET device can be improved through the provision of a structure, which preferably comprises polysilicon, along the sidewalls of the active silicon layer in the bottom of the active trench. Through appropriate oxidation, these structures, which are referred to herein as shallow trench isolation (STI) stressor structures, can be made to exert compressive stress in the channel direction of a PMOS device, thereby improving PMOS performance. If combined with the use of a nitride stressor structure in the NMOS regions of the device to prevent the incidence of bird's beak structures in those regions, overall transistor performance can be maximized. Unlike many of the methods that have been developed in the art to deal with the incidence of bird's beak structures, this approach is not aimed at preventing the formation of bird's beak structures, at least in the PMOS regions of a MOSFET device. To the contrary, this approach permits manufacturers of MOSFET devices to take advantage of the formation of bird's beak structures in the channel direction of a PMOS device, since such structures exert compressive stress in the channel region of the device with the advantages noted above.
The methodologies described herein may be further appreciated by first considering the prior art process depicted in
As seen in
After the active silicon layer 24 has been patterned, an oxide liner 30 may be thermally grown on the vertical sidewalls 32 of the active silicon layer 24 as shown in
As previously noted, it has been found that the prior art process depicted in
This stress is believed to be caused by the thermal growth process used to form the oxide liners 30. In particular, since the thermal growth of the oxide liners 30 occurs isotropically, including vertically along the sidewalls of the active silicon layer 24, as the oxide liners 30 are grown (see e.g.,
Various methods have been developed in the art to avoid the formation of bird's beak structures of the type depicted in
As shown in
As shown in
Next, as shown in
As shown in
The foregoing prior art processes depicted in
In some embodiments, the methodologies described herein can be used in combination with the approaches described in
The manner in which stressor structures may be formed can be appreciated with respect to
With reference to
The carrier wafer 223 may be, for example, a silicon wafer, a germanium wafer, a SiGe wafer, or other suitable types of wafers or substrates as are known to the art. The BOX layer 222 is preferably silicon dioxide, but may also comprise other dielectric materials as are known to the art. The pad oxide layer 226 comprises an oxide which may be the same as, or different from, the oxide of the BOX layer 222, though in some embodiments the pad oxide layer 226 may be replaced by other dielectric materials. The pad oxide layer 226 is preferably adapted to provide a suitable stress buffer to compensate for the differences in coefficients of thermal expansion in the active silicon layer 224 and the silicon nitride mask 228, and also serves as an adhesion promoter between the nitride mask 228 and the active silicon layer 224. The pad oxide layer 226 also protects silicon layer 224 during the wet etching process used to remove the silicon nitride mask layer 228 after polishing. This wet etching is typically conducted with phosphoric acid, which is known to etch silicon.
The active silicon layer 224 is the layer in which devices such as transistors will be built. It will be appreciated that, in some embodiments, the active silicon layer 224 may actually include a plurality of layers and/or a plurality of materials. For example, the active silicon layer 224 may be (but is not necessarily limited to) epitaxially grown silicon, epitaxially grown SiGe, or combinations thereof. In other embodiments, other semiconductor materials, such as, for example, Ge or SiGe, may be substituted for silicon in this layer.
In the particular structure 220 depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to
After deposition of the polysilicon layer 254, the polysilicon layer 254 is etched back to form polysilicon stressor structures 255 in the active trench as shown in
Referring still to
As shown in
After deposition or formation of the trench fill oxide 256, the polysilicon stressor structures 255 may then be oxidized (or further oxidized) through one or more thermal cycles. The thermal cycles may include densification (the process of subjecting the trench fill oxide 256 to a high temperature, typically within the range of 950° C. to 1200° C., to increase its density and/or improve its dielectric properties), sacrificial oxidation, double gate oxidation (DGO), or triple gate oxidation (TGO).
The improvements in MOSFET performance that are achievable with the methodologies described herein may be appreciated with respect to TABLE 1 below, which gives the piezoelectric resistance values for the NMOS and PMOS regions of a MOSFET device made in accordance with the method depicted in
It will be appreciated from the data set forth in TABLE 1 that the use of a polysilicon stressor structure provides the greatest improvement in drive current in the PMOS region of an SOI MOSFET device and when the stressor structure is aligned with the channel. This is so even though the use of polysilicon stressor structures slightly degrades the performance of the NMOS device, since the effect of the stressor structure in the PMOS region is the dominant effect with respect to overall CMOS performance. Hence, the use of polysilicon stressor structures in both regions provides a substantial improvement in device performance. Of course, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of a compressive stress material such as polysilicon could be used in the PMOS region in conjunction with the use of a tensile stress material such as nitride in the NMOS region to optimize overall CMOS performance.
The data set forth in TABLE 1 also suggest a number of possible variations to the methodologies and structures described above. For example, rather than applying a polysilicon stressor structure to both the PMOS and NMOS regions of a MOSFET device, it will be appreciated that suitable masking and/or etching techniques could be utilized to restrict the formation of these structures to only the PMOS region, or to selectively remove the polysilicon stressor structures or polysilicon layer from the NMOS region. Of course, in a given implementation, the increased process complication attendant to the additional masking and/or etching steps would have to be weighed against the improvement in device performance gained by this process.
Moreover, in some embodiments, one or more layers of nitride could be deposited which act in conjunction with the polysilicon to create dual stressor structures. Such structures could feature layer stacks comprising one or more layers of polysilicon and one or more layers of nitride, or could feature at least first and second distinct regions that are covered, respectively, by polysilicon and nitride. In such embodiments, the polysilicon stressor structure could act to provide compressive stress, while the nitride could act to prevent compressive stress from forming (or, put another way, could act as a tensile stressor structure). The use of nitride, particularly as a liner material, is also effective at preventing or minimizing the incidence of bird's beak structures (see, e.g.,
The data in TABLE 1 also indicate that the improvement in device performance in the channel direction comes to some extent at the expense of drive current in the width direction. In some embodiments, it may be possible to minimize degradation in device performance in the width direction by minimizing the width of the polysilicon stressor structure. A similar result may be achieved by applying nitride or another tensile stressor structure in the width direction of a PMOS device, while applying polysilicon as a compressive stressor structure in the channel direction. Here, it is to be noted that such a multidirectional approach may not be necessary for the NMOS device, since the data indicates that a tensile stressor structure such as nitride would improve device performance in both the channel and width directions.
As previously noted, after deposition of the trench fill oxide, the device is preferably subjected to thermal cycling. The thermal cycling may include densification, which is typically conducted within the range of 950° C. to 1200° C. As also previously noted, nitride layers have been used in the art to suppress the formation of bird's beak structures (see
The graph in
As seen from the graph, there is a significant drop in drive current (about 10%) in going from the higher temperature densification process to the lower temperature densification process. Additional studies have shown that a maximum densification temperature as low as 900° C. can produce even further improvements in drive currents. Maximum densification temperatures below about 900° C. are not preferred, since it is found that adequate densification may not occur within this range, with the result that subsequent etch processes will consume excessive amounts of the trench fill oxide. However, at peak densification temperatures above about 900° C., densification is sufficient, and yet sufficiently low to permit the trench fill oxide to be etched at a faster rate than would be the case if the trench fill oxide were denser (that is, the etch rate is higher than would be the case if the trench fill oxide were densified at a higher peak temperature). This results in the proper amount of oxide recess below the surface of the active silicon. At the same time, top corner rounding of the active silicon layer is improved, which improves the reliability of the MOSFET device.
Maximum densification temperatures above about 1050° C. are also not preferred, since it is found that the incidence of bird's beak structures begins to increase at these temperatures when a thermal oxidation step is part of the densification. Moreover, at temperatures above about 1050° C., the increased thermal stress in the trench fill oxide causes a shift in channel stress from tensile to compressive. This, in turn, degrades physical properties, such as ION, in the width direction of the channel.
In light of the above, the preferred maximum temperature for densification is within the range of about 900° C. to about 1050° C., and is more preferably within the range of about 900° C. to about 1000° C. Most preferably, the maximum temperature for densification is within the range of about 900° C. to about 950° C. The duration of exposure of the device to this peak densification temperature is typically at least 5 minutes, preferably at least about 10 minutes, more preferably within the range of about 10 minutes to about 40 minutes, and most preferably within the range of about 15 minutes to about 30 minutes.
The above description of the present invention is illustrative, and is not intended to be limiting. It will thus be appreciated that various additions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be construed in reference to the appended claims.