The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices, and, more particularly, to metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) devices including nanostructures and related methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an n-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A method for making semiconductor device may include forming a plurality of spaced apart gate stacks on a substrate defining respective trenches therebetween. Each gate stack may include alternating layers of first and second semiconductor materials, with the layers of the second semiconductor material defining nanostructures. The method may further include forming respective source/drain regions within the trenches, forming respective insulating regions adjacent lateral ends of the layers of the first semiconductor material, and forming respective dopant blocking superlattices adjacent lateral ends of the nanostructures and offset outwardly from adjacent surfaces of the insulating regions. Each dopant blocking superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions.
In an example embodiment, the method may further include forming a respective semiconductor buffer layer between each nanostructure and the adjacent dopant blocking superlattice. In some implementations, the method may also include forming a respective lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice between the substrate and the source/drain regions, with each lateral bottom dopant blocking superlattice comprising a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions.
By way of example, the first semiconductor material may comprise silicon germanium, and the second semiconductor material may comprise silicon. Also by way of example, the source/drain regions may comprise phosphorus doped silicon (Si:P), the base semiconductor monolayers may comprise silicon, and the non-semiconductor monolayers may comprise oxygen.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to semiconductor devices having an enhanced semiconductor superlattice therein to provide performance enhancement characteristics. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice may also be referred to as an “MST” layer or “MST technology” in this disclosure.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. In prior work, Applicant theorized that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,472, which is hereby incorporate herein in its entirety by reference.
Further development by Applicant has established that the presence of MST layers may advantageously improve the mobility of free carriers in semiconductor materials, e.g., at interfaces between silicon and insulators like SiO2 or HfO2. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that this may occur due to various mechanisms. One mechanism is by reducing the concentration of charged impurities proximate to the interface, by reducing the diffusion of these impurities, and/or by trapping the impurities so they do not reach the interface proximity. Charged impurities cause Coulomb scattering, which reduces mobility. Another mechanism is by improving the quality of the interface. For example, oxygen emitted from an MST film may provide oxygen to a Si—SiO2 interface, reducing the presence of sub-stoichiometric SiOx. Alternately, the trapping of interstitials by MST layers may reduce the concentration of interstitial silicon proximate to the Si—SiO2 interface, reducing the tendency to form sub-stoichiometric SiOx. Sub-stoichiometric SiOx at the Si—SiO2 interface is known to exhibit inferior insulating properties relative to stoichiometric SiO2. Reducing the amount of sub-stoichiometric SiOx at the interface may more effectively confine free carriers (electrons or holes) in the silicon, and thus improve the mobility of these carriers due to electric fields applied parallel to the interface, as is standard practice in field-effect-transistor (“FET”) structures. Scattering due to the direct influence of the interface is called “surface-roughness scattering”, which may advantageously be reduced by the proximity of MST layers followed by anneals or during thermal oxidation.
In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of MST structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and a non-semiconductor monolayer (s) 50 thereon. The non-semiconductor monolayers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The non-semiconductor monolayer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that non-semiconductor monolayers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present embodiments, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each non-semiconductor monolayer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the embodiments may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
Turning to
In some embodiments, silicon buffers 106a, 106b may optionally be epitaxially grown on the sides of the nanosheets 104 and the substrate 101 within the recess 103, respectively (
MST film and cap formation may then be performed (FIG. 4C) to define superlattices 125a and cap layers 152a on the buffers 106a, as well as a superlattice 125b and cap layer 152b on the buffer 106b (
Source/drain regions 107 may then be formed within the recesses 103 using a hard mask 108 (
Referring additionally to
It should be noted that in some embodiments the buffers 106a′ and/or 106b′ may be omitted, as the additional Si recess etching may provide sufficient surface smoothing without the buffer (s). Furthermore, formation of the cap layer 152b′ may occur as part of the source/drain region 107′ formation (Si:P process), which does not diminish the overall area available for the source/drain region. The cap layer 152′ eventually gets doped with P during this process. Additionally, in some embodiments the cap layers 152a′ and/or 152b′ may optionally be omitted. More particularly, in an example implementation the MST and Si:P formation may both advantageously occur within the same chamber in-situ, in which case MST layers without a cap layer may still provide desired blocking capabilities. The Si:P 107′ may then be etched where exposed through the hard mask 108′, and a metal 120′ deposited thereover (
While the superlattices 125a′ provide similar dopant blocking capabilities (i.e., blocking the phosphorous in the source/drain regions 107′ from the nanosheet 104 channel layers) to the superlattices 125a described above, the present approach may provide an additional advantage in that the buffers 106a′, superlattices 125a′, and cap layers 152a′ do not protrude into the source/drain regions 107′. By way of example, this configuration may occupy significantly less source/drain area, on the order of 11-25% in some embodiments, whereas the above-described approach may create additional resistance due to the loss of available source/drain surface area, which may be undesirable in certain embodiments.
Turning to
A potential drawback of this conventional approach is that there is a relatively small amount of contact area between the contact 70 and the source/drain region 67 (i.e., only at the top of the source/drain region), which may result in relatively high contact resistance. Various example embodiments which provide for enhanced contact area, and therefore lower contact resistance, are now described. One such example embodiment is described with reference to
In some embodiments, silicon buffers 206a, 206b may optionally be epitaxially grown on the sides of the nanosheets 204 and the substrate 201 within the recess 203, respectively (
Next, spacers 212 are formed on the inside edges of the hard mask 208, allowing the Si:P to be etched such that a Si:P liner remains within the trench 203 (
Another example embodiment which provides reduced contact resistance is now described with reference to
Still another example embodiment which provides reduced contact resistance is now described with reference to
Yet another example embodiment which provides reduced contact resistance is now described with reference to
Example dimensions which may be used for one of more of the following embodiments include: gate height=˜63 nm; gate length (Lg)=˜12 nm; SiGe layer thickness=˜12.8 nm; and Si nanosheet thickness=˜5 nm. However, it will be appreciated that other dimensions are possible in different configurations, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional app. nos. 63/507,578 and 63/492,038 filed Jun. 12, 2023 and Mar. 24, 2023, respectively, which are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6447933 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7402512 | Derraa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7535041 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9716147 | Mears | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9721790 | Mears et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9722046 | Mears et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972685 | Mears et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10355151 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361243 | Mears et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367028 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367064 | Rao | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381242 | Takeuchi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396223 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410880 | Takeuchi | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453945 | Mears et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461118 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468245 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10529757 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10529768 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566191 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10580867 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10593761 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608027 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608043 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615209 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636879 | Rao | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727049 | Weeks et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10741436 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763370 | Stephenson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10777451 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10797163 | Yu et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10811498 | Weeks et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10818755 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825901 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10825902 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10840335 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840336 | Connelly et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840337 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840388 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10847618 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854717 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868120 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10879356 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879357 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10884185 | Stephenson | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10937868 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10937888 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11075078 | Cody et al. | Jul 2021 | B1 |
11094818 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11177351 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11183565 | Burton et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11302823 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11329154 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355667 | Stephenson | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11362182 | Shin et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11387325 | Stephenson et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11430869 | Weeks et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11437486 | Burton | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11437487 | Burton | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11469302 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11569368 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11631584 | Hytha et al. | Apr 2023 | B1 |
11664427 | Stephenson et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11664459 | Stephenson | May 2023 | B2 |
11682712 | Hytha et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
11721546 | Hytha et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11728385 | Hytha et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11742202 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11810784 | Hytha et al. | Nov 2023 | B2 |
11837634 | Weeks et al. | Dec 2023 | B2 |
11848356 | Weeks et al. | Dec 2023 | B2 |
11869968 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
11923418 | Hytha et al. | Mar 2024 | B2 |
11923431 | Burton | Mar 2024 | B2 |
11935940 | Burton | Mar 2024 | B2 |
11978771 | Weeks et al. | May 2024 | B2 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040262594 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266116 | Mears | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029510 | Mears et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032241 | Mears et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050279991 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011905 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223215 | Blanchard | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231857 | Blanchard | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243964 | Kreps et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263980 | Kreps et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273299 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289049 | Rao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292765 | Blanchard | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010040 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015344 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020860 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063185 | Rao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063186 | Rao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158640 | Stephenson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166928 | Halilov et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187667 | Halilov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100270535 | Halilov et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20160163860 | Lee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170213913 | Lee et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190348539 | Yoo | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200135489 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200286991 | Basler | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210226066 | Young et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210367050 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220005706 | Weeks et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220005927 | Weeks et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220139911 | Wei et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220278204 | Shin et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220278226 | Hall et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220285152 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220310786 | Merchant et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220352322 | Hytha et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220359208 | Lin et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220367676 | Burton | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220376047 | Mears et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220384600 | Mears et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230006040 | Lee et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230040606 | Colombeau et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230060784 | Liu et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230122723 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230290862 | Hall et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230352299 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230361178 | Hytha et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230395374 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20230411491 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20230411557 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20240063268 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240072095 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240072096 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240097003 | Burton | Mar 2024 | A1 |
20240097026 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
Entry |
---|
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” ysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Maurizio Di Paolo Emilio “Quantum-Engineered Material Boosts Transistor Performance” https://www.eetimes. com/quantum-engineered-material-boosts-transistor-performance/# EE Times; retreived from internet Feb. 10, 2022; pp. 3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/613,401; filed Mar. 22, 2024 Donghun Kang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/613,435; filed Mar. 22, 2024 Donghun Kang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/613,476; filed Mar. 22, 2024 Donghun Kang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/613,509; filed Mar. 22, 2024 Donghun Kang. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/613,557; filed Mar. 22, 2024 Donghun Kang. |
Loubet et al. “Stacked nanosheet gate-all-around transistor to enable scaling beyond FinFET” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319035460; Abstract Only. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240322005 A1 | Sep 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63507578 | Jun 2023 | US | |
63492038 | Mar 2023 | US |