This invention relates to semiconductor processing, and more particularly, to reducing corrosion of metal surfaces that are exposed during the processing.
In the manufacturing of semiconductors, one of the problems has been corrosion of metal surfaces, especially when the metal is copper. This problem occurs primarily in one of two situations. One situation arises from the copper being deposited into trenches in an interlayer dielectric (ILD) and then subjected to chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). This CMP processing is in preparation for a subsequent ILD deposition, but this ILD deposition may not be able to be carried out immediately. Thus, there may be wafers with exposed copper that are in the ambient conditions of the fabrication facility. In such cases there is significant humidity. A typical amount of humidity is 40%. In this level of humidity, the copper begins corroding and given enough time, the corrosion is sufficient to cause two of the copper lines to be shorted together. One of the techniques to prevent this has been to have queue time rules that the wafers with the exposed copper can only be in the ambient conditions for a set amount of time. In practice, however, it is very difficult to keep such rules. The equipment that is used for subsequent processing may not be available for a variety of reasons, such as maintenance, repair, replacement, or qualification. This also may prevent optimum usage of the CMP. Optimum use of the CMP equipment can cause a big build-up in the amount of wafers with exposed copper. Such build-up can cause an imbalance on the work in process (WIP) in the line and thus force wafers to be exposed to the ambient for too long.
Similar problems occur during via formation in both copper and aluminum. In the case of vias, a hole is formed in the ILD above the metal layer and thereby the hole exposes a portion of the underlying metal. Exposure to the ambient causes the same corrosion situation. In this case the failure that is caused is an open instead of a short but the adverse effect is equally bad for both either a short or an open.
Thus, there is a need for a technique to allow for wafers to be able to have exposed metal surfaces for longer periods of time prior to the next stage in processing.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limited by the accompanying figures, in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which:
Skilled artisans appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve the understanding of the embodiments of the present invention.
In one aspect, a semiconductor process exposes metal in anticipation of an additional processing step that includes a deposition of a layer. Between the two processing steps, the exposed metal is exposed to ambient conditions that may include humidity. The effect of the humidity is potentially to cause corrosion of the exposed metal causing a yield loss. In order to withstand the various time periods that may occur between processing steps, an inhibitor is applied to the exposed surface causing the formation of a very thin protective layer on the exposed metal, which greatly inhibits corrosion. This thin protective layer does not cause any problems with the subsequent step because the typical following steps all, by their very nature, remove the protective layer. Thus, the time period between the processing step that exposes the metal and the next step is no longer critical due to the protective layer. This is better understood as shown in the drawings and described in the following description.
Shown in
Without protective layer 18 and in the presence of moisture, a potential can develop that causes corrosion. Protective layer 18 inhibits this corrosion so that semiconductor device 10 of
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Shown in
Additional steps that expose metal use inhibitors in the same manner as appropriate as described for
Shown in
For a simpler alternative, instead of a tool 36, an enclosure that is impregnated with the inhibitor can be used. In a simple form, the box is simply lined with a material that is both capable of holding the inhibitor and sufficiently outgassing it to achieve the desired protective layer.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. For example, specific examples of situations where metal is exposed were explained as benefiting from application of an inhibitor, but other situations that expose metal may also be situations that benefit from the application of an inhibitor. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present invention.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims. As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4973448 | Carlson | Nov 1990 | A |
6287977 | Hashim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6344432 | Wojtczak | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350687 | Avanzino et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6383928 | Eissa | May 2002 | B1 |
6482750 | Yokoi | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6524376 | Aoki | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524957 | Merchant et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6752844 | Miller et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784105 | Yang et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20010011515 | Aoki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010050350 | Wojtczak | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020065204 | Wojtczak | May 2002 | A1 |
20020132744 | Wojtczak | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020189643 | Chen | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030068853 | Conti | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078173 | Wojtczak | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083214 | Kakizawa | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087534 | Mallikarjunan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114000 | Noguchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030203624 | Sameshima et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0002238 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050130419 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |