Patent Grant
8066895
1. Field
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to method and apparatus for processing a semiconductor substrate. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention provide method and apparatus for processing a semiconductor substrate with improved uniformity.
2. Description of the Related Art
When processing substrates in a plasma environment, the uniformity of the plasma will affect the uniformity of processing. For example, in an etching process, more material is likely to be removed or etched from the substrate near the center of the substrate as compared to the edge of the substrate when plasma of the processing gases is greater in the area of the chamber corresponding to the center of the substrate. Similarly, if the plasma is greater in the area of the chamber corresponding to the edge of the substrate, more material may be removed or etched from the substrate at the edge of the substrate compared to the center of the substrate
Non-uniformity in plasma processes can significantly decrease device performance and lead to waste because the deposited layer or etched portion is not consistent across the substrate.
Excellent process uniformity has become increasingly important as semiconductor devices become continuously more complex. Uniformity is important in both the feature-scale (<1 micron) and the wafer-scale (300 mm). Non-uniformities arise from a variety of reasons, for example variation of concentration of different ingredients of a processing gas, such as etching and passivating species, ion bombardment flux and energy, and temperature within the feature profile and across the wafer.
One of the non-uniformities observed is CD (critical dimension) bias edge roll-off. CD bias refers to the difference between the critical dimension of a feature before and after processing. CD bias edge roll-off refers to decrease of CD bias toward an edge of a substrate compared to CD bias near a central region of the substrate.
Traditionally, non-uniformity during etch, such as the CD bias edge roll-off shown in
Therefore, there is a need for apparatus and method for processing a semiconductor substrate with reduced CD bias edge roll-off and other non-uniformity.
Embodiments of the present invention generally provide apparatus and methods for processing a semiconductor substrate. Particularly, the embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus and method for processing a substrate with increased uniformity.
One embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for processing a substrate comprising a chamber body defining a processing volume, a substrate support disposed in the processing volume, a showerhead disposed in the processing volume opposite to the substrate support, wherein the showerhead is configured to provide one or more processing gases to the processing volume, the showerhead has two or more distribution zones each independently controllable, and a plasma generation assembly configured to ignite a plasma from the processing gases in the processing gas in the processing volume.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method for processing a substrate comprising positioning the substrate on a substrate support disposed in a plasma chamber, flowing a first processing gas towards a top surface of the substrate, flowing a second processing gas towards an edge region of the substrate, wherein the first processing gas and the second processing gas are different, and striking a plasma of the processing gases in the plasma chamber.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention provides a method for adjusting process uniformity in an etching process comprising positioning a substrate on a substrate support disposed in a plasma chamber, flowing processing gases to the plasma chamber, wherein flowing the processing gases comprises flowing a first processing gas towards a central region of the substrate being processed at a first flow rate, flowing the first processing gas towards a region radially outwards the central region of the substrate at a second flow rate, and flowing a second processing gas towards an edge region of the substrate, and generating a plasma of the processing gases in the plasma chamber.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of embodiments of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.
Embodiments of the present invention generally provide apparatus and method for improving process uniformity. More particularly, the embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus and method for CD bias uniformity and edge roll-off. In one embodiment, a multi-zone showerhead is used for an etching process. In one embodiment, additional passivating gas is supplied to a plasma chamber from an outermost zone of the multi-zone showerhead while processing gas comprising both etching gas and passivating gas is supplied from one or more inner zones of the showerhead. Edge roll-off may be reduced by adjusting the passivating gas provided from the outermost zone of the showerhead. The overall CD bias uniformity may be adjusted by adjusting a ratio of flow rates among one or more inner zones of the showerhead. In another embodiment, the CD bias may be adjusted by adjusting spacing between the substrate and the showerhead.
The processing chamber 202 comprises a chamber wall 228, a chamber bottom 227, and a chamber lid 229. The chamber wall 228, chamber bottom 227, and the chamber lid 229 define a processing volume 218.
A substrate support 206 is disposed in the processing volume 218 configured to support the substrate 204 during processing. The substrate support 206 may move vertically and rotate about a central axis driven by a moving mechanism 262. In one embodiment, the substrate support 206 may be a conventional electrostatic chuck that actively holds the substrate 204 during processing.
In one embodiment, the substrate support 206 may be temperature controlled by a temperature controller 261 adapted to cool and heat the substrate support 206 to a desired temperature. The temperature controller 261 may use conventional means, such as embedded resistive heating elements, or fluid cooling channels that are coupled to a heat exchanger.
A showerhead 208 is disposed in the processing volume 218 through the chamber lid 229. The shower head 208 is disposed opposite the substrate support 206 and is configured to provide one or more processing gases to the processing volume 218 through a plurality of holes 209.
In one embodiment, the showerhead 208 may have multiple zones each configured to deliver processing gases to a certain area of the processing volume 218 and certain area of the substrate 204. Each of the multiple zones may be independently connected to the gas source 212, thus, allowing control of gas species and flow rate provided to different areas of the processing volume 218.
In one embodiment, the showerhead 208 may have multiple zones arranged in a concentric manner. As shown in
The gas source 212 may be a gas panel with multiple outputs each adapted to output an independent flow of an independent combination of species. A system controller 213 may be used to control flow rate and ratio of species provided from the gas source 212 to the inner zone 230, middle zone 231 and edge zone 232.
During processing, a plasma is generated within the processing volume 218 by a plasma generating assembly to process the substrate 204. In one embodiment, the plasma generating assembly may include a capacitor having the showerhead 208 and the substrate support 206 as electrodes. In one embodiment, a RF (radio frequency) power source 235 may be connected to the substrate support 206 through an impedance match network 234, and the showerhead 208 is grounded. A plasma may be generated in the processing volume 218 between the showerhead 208 and the substrate 204 when a RF power is applied to the substrate support 206.
It should be noted that other configurations of plasma may be applied, for example, a capacitive plasma generator with a RF power source applied to the showerhead 208 and the substrate support 206 is grounded, a capacitive plasma generator using electrodes other than the showerhead 208 and the substrate support 206, an inductively coupled plasma generator, or a combination of capacitive and inductive plasma generator. Inductive coils may be disposed above the showerhead 208 of the plasma reactor 200 for generating inductively coupled plasma. Exemplary inductive coupled plasma generator may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/960,111, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Processing a Substrate Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Technology,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
The showerhead 208 of the plasma reactor 200 is configured to adjust performance across the substrate 204 by adjusting flow rate and gas species supplied to different regions over the substrate 204.
Even though the showerhead 208 described here has three concentric zones for independent gas control, other arrangements, for example, more or less concentric zones, zones of different shapes, may be used for the same purpose.
Embodiments of the present invention provide method for improving process uniformity across a substrate. The method comprises one of adjusting flow rates to different regions of a processing chamber, adjusting components in the processing gas supplied to different regions, adjusting spacing between electrodes of a capacitive plasma generator, or combinations thereof.
The etching process is generally performed by positioning a substrate to be etched in a plasma chamber, flowing a processing gas into the chamber, and etching the substrate by generating a plasma of the processing gas in the plasma chamber. The processing gas generally comprises an etching gas and a passivating gas mixed in a certain ratio. The processing gas may also comprise a carrier gas. The etching gas may be CF4, C2F6, C4F8, Cl2, BCl3, CCl4, NF3, SF6, HBr, BBr3, C2F2, O2, H2, CH4, COS SO2, and combinations thereof, depending on the material to be etched. The passivating gas may comprise CHF3, CH2F2, CH3F, SiCl4, HBr, and the combinations thereof, depending on the material to be etched and the etching gas used. The carrier gas may be any inert gas, such as Ar, He, N2, and combinations thereof. It is to be appreciated that other suitable etching gases and passivating gases can also be used.
The examples listed below use a capacitively coupled CF4/CHF3 plasma to etch a silicon nitride hard mask, wherein CF4 acts as etching gas and CHF3 acts as passivating gas. The processing gas, CF4 and CHF3 in this case, is distributed to the chamber through a tri-zone showerhead. Flow rates, gas ratio, and spacing may be adjusted to adjust CD bias result across the substrate.
The showerhead used in the examples has three zones. Zone 1 covers a circular region of about 3.36 inch in diameter corresponding to a central region of the substrate being processed. Zone 2 covers a circular region with an inner diameter of about 3.36 inch and an outer diameter of about 7.68 inch. Zone 3 covers a circular region with an inner diameter of about 7.68 inch and an outer diameter of about 12 inch.
It has been observed that chemical etching processes exhibit a significant loading effect resulting from the depletion of active etching species by reaction with the film being etched. Thus, the etch rate depends on the etchable area either on the feature-scale (microloading) or on the substrate-scale (macroloading). On the feature-scale, microloading is brought about by differences in the feature dimension and pattern density. For example, isolated features etch at a different rate than dense features. Therefore, macroloading and microloading tunability is an essential requisite to a successful etching process. Thus, examples below are performed on both substrates with isolated features and substrates with dense features to examine macroloading and microloading tunability.
The following illustrates an exemplary etching process with the following parameters:
As shown in
Even though only the passivating gas is supplied near the edge region in Example 1, any adjustment to provide additional passivating gas near the edge region may be applied. For example, both etching gas and passivating gas may be supplied to all regions of the substrate, only a higher ratio of passivating gas is supplied near the edge compared to the central region of the substrate.
The following illustrates an exemplary etching process with the following parameters:
As shown in
The following illustrates an exemplary etching process with the following parameters:
The approaches illustrated in Examples above may be combined to achieve a desired processing profile across a substrate. Additionally, a desired processing profile may be any profiles depending on a process, for example, a uniform profile, an edge weak profile (where edge areas are processed less than central areas), or an edge strong profile (wherein edge areas are processed more than central areas).
Even though an etching process is described in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, embodiments of the present invention may be applied to improve uniformity across a substrate for any suitable processes, for example deposition and implantation.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5427621 | Gupta | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5498312 | Laermer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5549756 | Sorensen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5910221 | Wu | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5990016 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6042687 | Singh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6059885 | Ohashi et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6159297 | Herchen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6209480 | Moslehi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6390019 | Grimbergen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6551445 | Yokogawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6676760 | Kholodenko et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6713127 | Subramony et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6736931 | Collins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755932 | Masuda et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6793733 | Janakiraman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6818096 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6942929 | Han et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6983892 | Noorbakhsh et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7163585 | Nishimoto et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 20030045131 | Verbeke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111961 | Katz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040027781 | Hanawa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173155 | Nishimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191545 | Han et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040206305 | Choi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050016684 | Sun et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056218 | Sun et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067103 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050072526 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136657 | Yokoi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173569 | Noorbakhsh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271814 | Chang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276566 | Iimura | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060073690 | Brown et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060076109 | Holland et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070139856 | Holland et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215580 | Koshiishi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246443 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247073 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247075 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249173 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249182 | Mani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251917 | Bera et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256785 | Pamarthy et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080202609 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2001217227 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090218317 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
