The invention relates to the general field of electron lithography with particular reference to controlling sidewall slope angle.
As the critical dimension for devices drops below 100 nm, the wall angle (slope) of photoresist becomes very critical for subsequent etching, deposition, and lift off processes. The resist wall angle may vary from positive, normal, to negative, as illustrated in
Positive and normal sidewall slopes can be easily developed from negative-tone chemically amplified resists. However, it is nearly impossible to produce a negative wall angle from either negative or positive-tone chemically amplified resists, especially by e-beam lithography. Due to electron forward scattering in the resist and backward scattering from the substrate, a positive wall angle is usually formed with negative-tone chemically amplified resists. Positive e-beam resists are unable to produce a consistent wall angle and tend to exhibit resist foot necking such as 21 seen in
As magnetic recording is pushed to higher areal densities, perpendicular recording has become a serious candidate to replace longitudinal recording. Perpendicular recording uses a magnetic yoke (surrounded by field coil) which terminates as a single pole that is used for the write head. This pole needs to be wide enough at one end to attach to the yoke and narrow enough at its the other end to confine the write flux to a very small area (typically measuring about 0.1 by 0.1 microns). Objects of this type are most easily formed using micro-molding techniques. Since negative resists can be easily applied to create such molds, it is important to be able to control the slope of the sidewalls.
A routine search of the prior art was performed with the following references of interest being found:
U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,626 (Fernandes et al) teaches using a tilt angle in photolithography while U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,675 (Shukh et al) discloses a trapezoidal write pole. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,255,035, Minter et al. describe two photoresist layers exposed to e-beam to form negative resist sidewalls and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,238,559, Feng et al. teach that undercut resist profiles are easily attainable using e-beam lithography.
It has been an object of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide a method for forming a photoresist pedestal whose sidewalls slope inwards.
Another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been for said method to further allow fine tuning of the exact amount of said negative slope.
Still another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been that said method be suitable for use in electron beam lithography.
A further object of at least one embodiment of the present invention has been to provide a process for manufacturing a trapezoidally shaped pole tip for use in a vertical magnetic writer.
These objects have been achieved by first forming a photoresist pedestal in the conventional way. This is followed by flood exposing said pedestal with electrons followed by a second development treatment which results in removal of additional material from the sidewalls, said removal being greatest at the substrate and least at the pedestal's top surface, resulting in negatively sloping sidewalls. Additionally, an application of this method to a process for forming a pole tip for a vertical magnetic writer is also described.
a, 1b, and 1c illustrate three possible types of sidewall in pedestals formed from photoresist.
Referring now to
Now follows a key feature of the invention. As shown in
Accordingly, a second baking treatment (heating to a temperature between about 80 and 120% C for up to 5 minutes, with about 100° C. for 2 minutes being preferred) is given, followed by a second development treatment, a key feature being that a more concentrated developer is used this time (immersion in a TMAH solution having a concentration between about 1 and 3% for between about 10 and 60 seconds, with about 2.38% TMAH for 60 seconds being preferred), causing sidewalls 61 to slope inwards (at an angle of between about 15 and 90 degrees from vertical, with a slope in the range of 15.5 to 60 degrees being preferred) so that the pedestal is widest at its top surface and narrowest at the substrate. This is illustrated in
In a second embodiment of the invention, the flooded electron beam is applied at an angle relative to the vertical. This is illustrated as beam 51b in
An important advantage of the second embodiment is that it enables the extent of negative sidewall slope to be tunable—the greater the beam tilt, the more negative the sidewall slope.
We have applied the above method to the development of a process for manufacturing a trapezoid-shaped write pole for the use in perpendicular magnetic recording. This process begins with the formation of a photoresist pedestal with negatively sloping sidewalls as just described above and shown as trapezoidal pedestal 41 in
A conformal coating of non-magnetic material 91 (such as aluminum oxide or silicon oxide) is then deposited to a thickness that is sufficient to fully enclose said trapezoidal prism (typically between about 0.1 and 0.3 microns) as shown in
All exposed surfaces, including mold 45, are then coated with seed layer 92, as seen in
The process concludes with planarizing until seed layer 92 has been just removed (except inside the mold itself, resulting in the formation of write pole 93.
This application is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 11/588,574, filed on Oct. 27, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,227 which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/660,914, filed on Sep. 12, 2003, now patented as U.S. Pat. No. 7,132,221, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4238559 | Feng et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4656546 | Mallory | Apr 1987 | A |
4672493 | Schewe | Jun 1987 | A |
5310626 | Fernandes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5408373 | Bajorek et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5452164 | Cole et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5649351 | Cole et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5725997 | Kamijima | Mar 1998 | A |
6255035 | Minter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6504675 | Shukh et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510024 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6710973 | Okada et al | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7132221 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20040223258 | Giorgis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060002021 | Li et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044677 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080213691 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10660914 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11588574 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11588574 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 12082256 | US |