The present application is related to the following patent application, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes:
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 6,952,030, issued to Herner et al., filed May 26, 2004, and entitled “High-density three-dimensional memory cell.”
The present invention relates to semiconductor manufacturing techniques and more particularly to cost-effectively increasing feature density using a mask shrinking process with double patterning.
Integrated circuits continue to follow Moore's Law in that the density of devices that may be formed on a chip continues to double every two years. Present manufacturing facilities routinely produce circuits with 130 nm, 90 nm, and even 65 nm feature sizes, and future facilities are expected to produce devices with even smaller feature sizes.
The continued reduction in device geometries has generated a demand for methods of forming nanometer sized features that are separated by nanometer sized distances. As the limits of optical resolution are being approached in current lithography processes, one method that has been developed to reduce the distance between features or devices on a substrate includes a double patterning of a hardmask layer that is used to transfer a pattern into the substrate. In the double patterning method, a hardmask layer is deposited on a substrate layer that is to be etched. The hardmask layer is patterned by photoresist deposited on the hardmask layer. The photoresist is then removed, and a second pattern is introduced into the hardmask layer with a second photoresist that is deposited on the hardmask layer.
However, as feature size and pitch is further reduced, the limits of optical resolution are exceeded even using the double patterning technique described above. Thus, while prior art double patterning methods can be used to reduce the size of, and distance between, features on a substrate using 130 nm process technology, light reflection and refraction limits the maximum resolution of such lithography techniques used with smaller process technology. Thus, what is needed are new methods that allow feature density to be increased without requiring optical resolution limits to be exceeded.
In some aspects of the invention, a method is provided that includes forming a first hardmask at a maximum feature density of a process technology; shrinking the first hardmask; forming a second hardmask at the maximum feature density laterally shifted relative to the first hardmask; shrinking the second hardmask; and forming at least a portion of a memory array using the first and second hardmasks.
In some aspects of the invention, a method is provided that includes forming a first mask over device layers; shrinking the first mask; forming a protective layer over the first mask; forming a second mask shifted relative to the first mask; and shrinking the second mask.
In some aspects of the invention, a method is provided that includes forming a first hardmask over a plurality of device layers; exposing the first hardmask to ozone mixed with a halogenated additive; forming a protective layer over the first hardmask; forming a second hardmask on the protective layer shifted relative to the first hardmask; and exposing the second hardmask to ozone mixed with the halogenated additive.
In some aspects of the invention, a method is provided for forming an array of devices. The method includes forming a stack of a plurality of material layers; forming a first hardmask over the plurality of material layers; exposing the first hardmask to ozone mixed with a halogenated additive; forming a protective layer over the first hardmask; forming a second mask on the protective layer shifted relative to the first mask; exposing the second hardmask to ozone mixed with the halogenated additive; and etching the plurality of material layers to remove material not covered by either hardmask.
In some aspects of the invention, memory arrays formed using the above methods are provided. Other features and aspects of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides a cost-effect means of reducing the minimum feature size and pitch that a given process technology may achieve. For example, the present invention may be used to create approximately 45 nm features using 90 nm process technology or approximately 32 nm features using 65 nm process technology.
According to the present invention, a first mask layer is patterned; a novel process to thin or “shrink” the dimensions of individual elements or features of the first mask is applied (e.g., the pitch or space between lines of the mask is increased by narrowing the width of the lines themselves); a protective layer is applied over the shrunken first mask; a second mask is patterned on the protective layer but shifted relative to the first mask; the second mask is shrunk using the novel process; and then the unmasked areas are etched away to form the reduced size features.
By controllably reducing or shrinking the width of lines of a mask, the present invention effectively enables additional mask lines to be inserted between the original lines to create a mask with lines having widths and pitches that are approximately half the minimum nominal widths and pitches of the process technology (e.g., 32 nm, 65 nm, 80 nm, 90 nm process) being employed. Likewise, by controllably reducing the size of individual two-dimensional areas or features of a mask, the present invention effectively enables additional two-dimensional mask areas (e.g., features) to be inserted between the original areas to create a mask with mask areas having dimensions and pitches that are approximately half the minimum nominal widths and pitches of the process technology being used. Therefore, embodiments of the present invention effectively enables approximately doubling feature density. Note that, as used herein and unless otherwise specified, the term “shrinking” is intended to refer to reducing the dimensions of individual mask features and not necessarily to reducing the overall size of a mask.
In some embodiments, the present invention may be used to further controllably shrink hardmask material so that features of even smaller sizes may be created and multiple additional features inserted between the reduced size features. In other words, for example, instead of only shrinking hardmask features by approximately 50%, the methods of the present invention may be used to shrink features of a hardmask to 20% of their original size. Thus, instead of having room for only a single additional feature between the elements of the first pattern, two or more additional features may be formed between each of the shrunken hardmask elements. In some embodiments, triple or multiple patterning may be employed to implement inserting multiple hardmask elements between the initial shrunken hardmask elements. Therefore, the present invention may effectively enable approximately tripling, quadrupling, quintupling, etc. feature density. Likewise, the more the pattern features of a hardmask are shrunk, the more room will be available for additional hardmask pattern features to be inserted.
In some embodiments, the present invention may be employed to pattern approximately 45 nm wide diode pillars approximately 45 nm apart using 80 nm process technology. In other embodiments, the present invention may be employed to pattern approximately 45 nm wide conductor lines with an approximately 45 nm pitch using 80 nm process technology. In some embodiments, the controlled shrinking of the masks may be achieved by exposing the masks to ozone mixed with a halogenated additive solution (e.g., a dilute mixture of hydrofluoric acid (HF) in water). Thus, for example, fluorozone may be used to shrink a polysilicon hardmask that was initially formed with approximately 80 nm wide elements that are approximately 80 nm apart to a mask with approximately 45 nm wide elements that are approximately 160 nm apart, creating room for inserting an additional hardmask element. Thus, in some embodiments, the feature size of the hardmasks may be reduced to approximately 35% to approximately 65% of the original size and the feature pitch may be increased by approximately 70% to approximately 130%.
As indicated above, the mask shrinking may be performed in a two step process using double patterning to accurately locate the second mask between the shrunken elements of the first mask. Note that prior art techniques that use double patterning either require features in the photoresist to have a width that is the same size as the width of the final features of the devices on the substrate, rely on methods of shrinking photoresist instead of a hardmask, or require the use of relatively costly immersion lithography technology.
Turning now to
With reference to
Thus, in addition to layers that include materials to form diode pillars, layers that are used to form conductors (not shown) and insulators (not shown) may also be present on or between the levels of layers. Further the layers may be inverted as compared to the layers depicted in
A layer of tetraethyl orthosilicate 110 or Si(OC2H5)4 (hereinafter “TEOS”) may be formed on the diode films. The TEOS layer 110 may have a thickness in the range of approximately 500 angstroms to approximately 4000 angstroms depending on the thickness of the stack of the diode films. Other materials such as SOG (spin on glass) and amorphous carbon may be used in place of TEOS.
On the TEOS layer 110, a layer of hardmask material 112 may be deposited. In some embodiments, a polycrystalline semiconductor material may be used as a hardmask 112 such as polysilicon, a polycrystalline silicon-germanium alloy, polygermanium or any other suitable material. In other embodiments, a material such as tungsten (W) may be used. The hardmask material layer 112 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the shrinking process parameters described below. In other words, in some embodiments, the hardmask material layer 112 may have an initial thickness in the range of approximately 500 angstroms to approximately 3000 angstroms depending on, for example, the concentrations of the components of the fluorozone process to be used.
To pattern the hardmask layer 112, photolithography layers such as Bottom Anti-Reflection Coating (BARC) 114 and patterned photoresist 116 may be deposited on the hardmask layer 112. The depths of the BARC 114 and photoresist 116 layers may be in the range of approximately 100 angstroms to approximately 2000 angstroms depending on the lithography process. Other resist or photolithography layers practicable and suitable for patterning the selected hardmask material 112 may be used.
According to the present invention, the photoresist 116 may be patterned using the highest feature density achievable with the process technology being used. Thus, if for example, 80 nm technology is used, the width of the elements of the photoresist pattern for forming features (e.g., diode pillars) may be 80 nm and the pitch, or spacing between the elements of the photoresist pattern, may also be 80 nm. Likewise, if 65 nm technology is used, the width of the elements of the photoresist pattern for forming features may be 65 nm and the pitch may also be 65 nm. Note that this is in contrast to convention double patterning methods where elements of the first photoresist pattern are required to be spaced apart further than the maximum density (e.g., minimum pitch) of the process technology being used.
Turning to
Turning to
In some embodiments, fluorozone suitable for controllably shrinking hardmask materials may be formed using dilute hydrofluoric acid having a concentration in the range of approximately 0.03 Wt. % to approximately 0.2 Wt %. The ozone flow rate may be in the range of approximately 1 LPM to approximately 5 LPM with an O3 concentration in the range of approximately 100 ppm to approximately 300 ppm. In some embodiments the dilute hydrofluoric acid may be heated to a temperature in the range of approximately 18° C. to approximately 35° C. The fluorozone process may be performed, for example, in a Raider® spray acid chamber manufactured by SemiTool Inc. of Kalispell, Mont. operating within a range of approximately 300 rpm to approximately 600 rpm. As indicated above, the initial hardmask 112 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the fluorozone process parameters. Also as indicated above, the controlled shrinking of the hardmask may be performed to reduce the hardmask's feature size by approximately 50%. This may be achieved by exposing the hardmask to the fluorozone process for a time in the range of approximately 5 seconds to approximately 0.25 hours. Further, in some embodiments, additional shrinkage may be achieved through longer exposure to the fluorozone process. In some embodiments, any native oxide on the surface of the hardmask may been removed prior to or during the exposure of the hardmask material to fluorozone.
Turning to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning to
Turning to
As above, in some embodiments, fluorozone suitable for controllably shrinking hardmask materials may be formed using dilute hydrofluoric acid having a concentration in the range of approximately 0.03 Wt. % to approximately 0.2 Wt %. The ozone flow rate may be in the range of approximately 1 LPM to approximately 5 LPM with an O3 concentration in the range of approximately 100 ppm to approximately 300 ppm. In some embodiments the dilute hydrofluoric acid may be heated to a temperature in the range of approximately 18° C. to approximately 35° C. The fluorozone process may be performed, for example, in a Raider® spray acid chamber manufactured by SemiTool Inc. of Kalispell, Mont. operating within a range of approximately 300 rpm to approximately 600 rpm. As indicated above, the initial hardmask 120 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the fluorozone process parameters. Also as indicated above, the controlled shrinking of the hardmask may be performed to reduce the hardmask's feature size by approximately 50%. This may be achieved by exposing the hardmask to the fluorozone process for a time in the range of approximately 5 seconds to approximately 0.25 hours. Further, in some embodiments, additional shrinkage may be achieved through longer exposure to the fluorozone process. In some embodiments, any native oxide on the surface of the hardmask may been removed prior to or during the exposure of the hardmask material to fluorozone.
Going from
Although not shown, in some embodiments, after the diode pillar array has been formed, a dielectric layer may be deposited over the substrate 100 so as to fill the voids between the diode pillars. For example, approximately 200 to approximately 7000 angstroms of silicon dioxide may be deposited on the substrate 100 and planarized using chemical mechanical polishing or an etchback process to form a planar surface. Other dielectric materials such as silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, low K dielectrics, etc., and/or other dielectric layer thicknesses may be used. Exemplary low K dielectrics include carbon doped oxides, silicon carbon layers, or the like.
Turning now to
With reference to
A layer of TEOS 208 may be formed on the conductor films. The TEOS layer 208 may have a thickness in the range of approximately 500 angstroms to approximately 4000 angstroms depending on the thickness of the wire material (films 202 & 204). Other materials such as SOG (spin on glass) and amorphous carbon may be used in place of TEOS.
On the TEOS layer 208, a layer of hardmask material 210 may be deposited. In some embodiments, a polycrystalline semiconductor material may be used as a hardmask 210 such as polysilicon, a polycrystalline silicon-germanium alloy, polygermanium or any other suitable material. In other embodiments, a material such as tungsten (W) may be used. The hardmask material layer 210 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the shrinking process parameters described below. In other words, in some embodiments, the hardmask material layer 210 may have an initial thickness in the range of approximately 500 angstroms to approximately 3000 angstroms depending on, for example, the concentrations of the components of the fluorozone process to be used.
To pattern the hardmask layer 210, photolithography layers such as Bottom Anti-Reflection Coating (BARC) 212 and patterned photoresist 214 may be deposited on the hardmask layer 210. The depths of the BARC 212 and photoresist 214 layers may be in the range of approximately 100 angstroms to approximately 2000 angstroms depending on the lithography process. Other resist or photolithography layers practicable and suitable for patterning the selected hardmask material 210 may be used.
According to the present invention, the photoresist 214 may be patterned using the highest feature density achievable with the process technology being used. Thus, if for example, 80 nm technology is used, the width of the elements of the photoresist pattern for forming features (e.g., diode pillars) may be 80 nm and the pitch, or spacing between the elements of the photoresist pattern, may also be 80 nm. Likewise, if 65 nm technology is used, the width of the elements of the photoresist pattern for forming features may be 65 nm and the pitch may also be 65 nm. Note that this is in contrast to convention double patterning methods where elements of the first photoresist pattern are required to be spaced apart further than the maximum density (e.g., minimum pitch) of the process technology being used.
Turning to
Turning to
In some embodiments, fluorozone suitable for controllably shrinking hardmask materials may be formed using dilute hydrofluoric acid having a concentration in the range of approximately 0.03 Wt. % to approximately 0.2 Wt %. The ozone flow rate may be in the range of approximately 1 LPM to approximately 5 LPM with an O3 concentration in the range of approximately 100 ppm to approximately 300 ppm. In some embodiments the dilute hydrofluoric acid may be heated to a temperature in the range of approximately 18° C. to approximately 35° C. The fluorozone process may be performed, for example, in a Raider® spray acid chamber manufactured by SemiTool Inc. of Kalispell, Mont. operating within a range of approximately 300 rpm to approximately 600 rpm. As indicated above, the initial hardmask 210 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the fluorozone process parameters. Also as indicated above, the controlled shrinking of the hardmask may be performed to reduce the hardmask's feature size by approximately 50%. This may be achieved by exposing the hardmask to the fluorozone process for a time in the range of approximately 5 seconds to approximately 0.25 hours. Further, in some embodiments, additional shrinkage may be achieved through longer exposure to the fluorozone process. In some embodiments, any native oxide on the surface of the hardmask may been removed prior to or during the exposure of the hardmask material to fluorozone.
Turning to
Still with reference to
Turning now to
Turning to
Turning to
As above, in some embodiments, fluorozone suitable for controllably shrinking hardmask materials may be formed using dilute hydrofluoric acid having a concentration in the range of approximately 0.03 Wt. % to approximately 0.2 Wt %. The ozone flow rate may be in the range of approximately 1 LPM to approximately 5 LPM with an O3 concentration in the range of approximately 100 ppm to approximately 300 ppm. In some embodiments the dilute hydrofluoric acid may be heated to a temperature in the range of approximately 18° C. to approximately 35° C. The fluorozone process may be performed, for example, in a Raider® spray acid chamber manufactured by SemiTool Inc. of Kalispell, Mont. operating within a range of approximately 300 rpm to approximately 600 rpm. Other similar tools maybe used. As indicated above, the initial hardmask 218 thickness may be of varying thickness, depending on the fluorozone process parameters. Also as indicated above, the controlled shrinking of the hardmask may be performed to reduce the hardmask's feature size by approximately 50%. This may be achieved by exposing the hardmask to the fluorozone process for a time in the range of approximately 5 seconds to approximately 0.25 hours. Further, in some embodiments, additional shrinkage may be achieved through longer exposure to the fluorozone process. In some embodiments, any native oxide on the surface of the hardmask may been removed prior to or during the exposure of the hardmask material to fluorozone.
Going from
Although not shown, in some embodiments, after the conductor array has been formed, a dielectric layer may be deposited over the substrate 200 so as to fill the voids between the conductors. For example, approximately 200 to approximately 7000 angstroms of silicon dioxide may be deposited on the substrate 200 and planarized using chemical mechanical polishing or an etchback process to form a planar surface. Other dielectric materials such as silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, low K dielectrics, etc., and/or other dielectric layer thicknesses may be used. Exemplary low K dielectrics include carbon doped oxides, silicon carbon layers, or the like.
The foregoing description discloses only exemplary embodiments of the invention. Modifications of the above disclosed apparatus and methods which fall within the scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. For instance, although the present invention has been described primarily with regard to using FluorOzone to shrink the hardmask, other additives may be mixed with ozone to chemically shrink the mask.
Accordingly, while the present invention has been disclosed in connection with exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood that other embodiments may fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims.