The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to radio frequency (RF) semiconductor devices and related methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an n-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A method for making a radio frequency (RF) semiconductor device may include forming an RF ground plane layer on a semiconductor-on-insulator substrate and comprising a conductive superlattice. The conductive superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked doped base semiconductor monolayers defining a doped base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent doped base semiconductor portions. The method may further include forming a body above the RF ground plane layer, forming spaced apart source and drain regions adjacent the body and defining a channel region in the body, and forming a gate overlying the channel region.
In an example embodiment, the RF semiconductor device may comprise an RF switch. The method may further include forming a body contact coupled to the body and the RF ground plane layer. More particularly, the body contact may include first and second body contact portions adjacent opposite ends of the channel region.
By way of example, the RF ground plane may have a thickness in a range of 10-50 nm. Also by way of example, the doped base semiconductor portions may have a dopant concentration of at least 5×1017 cm−3. Forming the gate may include forming a gate insulator over the channel region, and forming a gate electrode over the gate insulator.
In an example implementation, the doped base semiconductor monolayers may comprise silicon, and the non-semiconductor monolayers may comprise oxygen. Moreover, the semiconductor-on-insulator substrate may comprise a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, for example.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to radio frequency (RF) semiconductor-on-insulator (SOI) devices having an enhanced semiconductor superlattice therein to provide performance enhancement characteristics. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice may also be referred to as an “MST” layer or “MST technology” in this disclosure.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for electrons and:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
Referring now additionally to
In an example embodiment, an RF semiconductor device 60 advantageously incorporates an MST layer, such as those described above, to advantageously provide for a more highly doped “ground plane” (GP) above the BOX, yet which is constrained to the lower portion of the silicon-on-BOX such that it does not cause a high threshold voltage (Vt) or otherwise impair the operation of the device. The RF-SOI device 60 illustratively includes a semiconductor-on-insulator substrate, and an RF ground plane layer on the semiconductor-on-insulator substrate including a semiconductor (e.g., silicon) substrate layer 62, a BOX layer 63 (e.g., SiO2), and a semiconductor (e.g., silicon) layer 64 on the BOX layer. A conductive superlattice 25 (such as the MST superlattice layers described further above) is above the semiconductor layer 64. More particularly, the conductive superlattice 25 and semiconductor layer 64 below the superlattice are highly doped to define the ground plane 65. It should be noted that in some embodiments, portions of the body 66 directly above the superlattice 25 may also include ground plane dopant and define a portion of the ground plane 65. Moreover, in the illustrated embodiment the superlattice 25 is selectively deposited in the ground plane 65 region, but in other embodiments a blanket superlattice deposition across the entire substrate 61 may be used, as will be discussed further below.
The RF semiconductor device 60 further illustratively includes a body 66 above the RF ground plane layer 65, spaced apart source and drain regions 67, 68 adjacent the body and defining a channel region 70 in the body, and a gate 71 overlying the channel region. The gate 71 illustratively includes a gate insulator 72 (e.g., SiO2) over the channel region 70, and a gate electrode 73 (e.g., polysilicon) over the gate insulator.
An equivalent circuit diagram 75 for the RF semiconductor device 60 is shown in
Through simulation, Applicant has determined that a ground plane doping immediately above the BOX layer 63 in a range of 10-20 nm thickness and 5E17 cm−3, and more preferably 1E18 cm−3, doping (or above) may significantly improve the breakdown voltage of RF-SOI devices (e.g., by up to 1V for a 5V device). If other device characteristics are not impaired, this leads to a significant improvement in the key metric of Ron-BV, where Ron is the ON state resistance. It has also been verified through simulation that example RF-SOI devices incorporating an MST film may advantageously maintain or reduce the junction capacitance, and hence the Coff, thus improving another key metric, namely Ron-Coff versus BV.
More particularly, the superlattice 25 effectively forms the ground-plane doping layer, confining dopants (e.g., boron for an N channel device) at the interface between the BOX layer 63 and SOI layer 64. Furthermore, the ground plane 65 also serves as a Vt adjustment doping layer. The illustrated structure also allows for scaling SOI to desirable thicknesses, e.g., down to 35 nm or less. In addition, the approach is also effective in gate length scaling as well, with simulations projecting desirable gate control for Lg=65 nm devices.
Another consideration with conventional RF-SOI devices is body potential increase due to SOI body pinch-off. More particularly, typical SOI body pinches off at approximately 0.5 um from the body contact, and holes may accumulate at the gate oxide interface due to a negative bias. As a result, the rest of the SOI body is depleted, and body potential may be raised due to the pinch off. Yet, the ground plane 65 of the device 60 advantageously improves breakdown voltage (BV) by accumulating and retaining dopant (e.g., boron) at the SOI/BOX interface, mitigating body potential increase by body resistance reduction. On the other hand, removal of boron from the SOI/BOX interface (counter-GP) degrades BV, as seen in the graph 76 of
In an example technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulation of the device 60, the following parameters were used: gate length LG=65 nm; thickness of the silicon between the BOX 63 and gate 71 TSOI=35 nm; thickness of the ground plane 65 TGP=20 nm; n-type dopant concentration of the ground plane NGP=4.5E18/cm3; body 66 thickness TSSR=15 nm; n-type dopant concentration in the channel Nch=1E16/cm3; n-type dopant concentration in the lightly-doped drain region NLDD=2E19/cm3; thickness of the lightly-doped drain region XJ=20 nm (at 4E18/cm3); and an offset spacer=12.5 nm. The projected electrical performance values from the simulation were as follows: RDSON=452 ohm-um (IDLIN=221 uA/um at VDS=0.1V); IOFF=0.8 nA/um; VTLIN=0.700V; and VTSAT=0.439V. These results are shown in the graph 78 of
Generally speaking, MST layers may be used to advantageously maintain and/or create the highly doped ground plane 65 using various example approaches. In one example embodiment, the entire silicon-on-BOX region is fabricated to have p-doping of the desired ground plane specification (e.g., greater than approximately 1E18 cm−3). MST deposition is then applied either to the whole starting substrate, or selectively to only the NMOS switch devices after an appropriate etch in those regions.
If regular undoped silicon epitaxy is applied to the substrate 61, up-diffusion of the p-type dopant (typically boron) during epitaxy will occur into the whole thickness of the silicon layer 64 on the BOX layer 63, and this diffusion will be further enhanced during the gate oxidation process (and any other thermal annealing steps) so that the silicon-on-BOX will be much more uniformly doped at the end of the process and the advantage of the GP doping will be lost. However, this may be advantageous for the creation of other NMOS and PMOS devices such as those required for CMOS low-noise amplifiers and other circuit elements, since the reduced p-type doping of the silicon-on-BOX may be more readily counter-doped to create the PMOS devices.
More particularly, the growth of MST layers will both trap the p-type dopant and inhibit up-diffusion, by absorbing silicon self-interstitials, which mediate diffusion for many dopants, including boron and phosphorus. Thus, where MST is applied, the ground plane doping will be held in place. If needed, the doping close to the BOX may also be enhanced by a subsequent implant. The MST layers will also serve to trap this implanted dopant. In the case where MST is applied in a blanket deposition across the whole wafer on a previously p-doped ground plane, Applicant speculates without wishing to be bound thereto that it will still be possible to create PMOS devices where required by counter-doping, since the MST layer will also strongly trap n-type dopants such as phosphorus.
In an example implementation, a starting silicon-on-insulator substrate with a silicon-on-BOX p-type doping (e.g., above 5E17) may be provided, along with MST layers (as described further above) in the silicon-on-BOX region such that the remainder of the silicon above the MST layers is substantially un-doped (and >10 nm depth, for example).
In accordance with another example, a starting silicon-on-insulator substrate is provided where the desired ground plane p-type doping (e.g., above 5E17 cm−3) is implanted. MST layers (as described further above) are also provided in the silicon-on-BOX region such that the remainder of the silicon above the MST layers is substantially un-doped.
Turning to
Fabrication of the device 60 begins with the growth of a screen oxide 182 on the starting SOI substrate or wafer 161 (
After removal of the second PR mask 184 and screen oxide 183 (
Another example fabrication approach is now described with reference to
Following an STI module (
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer (SIMS) was used to confirm the viability of ground plane and Vt implant doping by locating an MST film near a BOX layer, as discussed above, and the results are shown in the graph 130 of
Moreover, SIMS was also used to confirm the viability of ground plane and Vt implant doping after MST film deposition, and the results are shown in the graphs 140, 150 of
More particularly, the MST film advantageously provides for the retention of a relatively high dopant concentration in the ground plane layer which, in turn, provides faster RF device switching, lower on resistance and desired breakdown performance. The above-described processes also permit adjustment of the Vt of the other RF devices having a lower dopant concentration than the RF switching devices, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Further details regarding the dopant retention capabilities of MST films may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,899,479 to Mears et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 10,580,866 to Takeuchi et al., both of which are assigned to the present Applicant and are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 63/156,052 filed Mar. 3, 2021, and provisional application Ser. No. 63/159,714 filed Mar. 11, 2021, which are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6141361 | Mears et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7067856 | Ramdani | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972685 | Mears et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10355151 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361243 | Mears et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367028 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367064 | Rao | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381242 | Takeuchi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396223 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410880 | Takeuchi | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453945 | Mears et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461118 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468245 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10529757 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10529768 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566191 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10580867 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10593761 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608027 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608043 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615209 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636879 | Rao | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727049 | Weeks et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10741436 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763370 | Stephenson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10777451 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10811498 | Weeks et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10818755 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825901 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10825902 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10840335 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840336 | Connelly et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840337 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840388 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10847618 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854717 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868120 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10879356 | Stephenson | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879357 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10884185 | Stephenson | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10937868 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10937888 | Burton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11075078 | Cody et al. | Jul 2021 | B1 |
11094818 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11177351 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11183565 | Burton et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080258134 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090108350 | Cai et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160233333 | Toh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160358773 | Mears et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190189652 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190319135 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319167 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200135489 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200321467 | Brindle et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200343380 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200411645 | Weeks et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210074814 | Stephenson et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210217875 | Burton | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210217880 | Burton | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210265509 | Weeks et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210391426 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210391446 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220005706 | Weeks et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220005926 | Weeks et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220005927 | Weeks et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,289, filed Apr. 21, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,329, filed Apr. 21, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/330,831, filed May 26, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/330,860, filed May 26, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/452,604, filed Oct. 28, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/452,610, filed Oct. 28, 2021 Hytha et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/653,305, filed Mar. 3, 2022 Takeuchi et al. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
Maurizio Di Paolo Emilio “Quantum-Engineered Material Boosts Transistor Performance” https://www.eetimes.com/quantum- engineered-material-boosts-transistor-performance/# EE Times; retreived from internet Feb. 10, 2022; pp. 3. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” ysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220285153 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63159714 | Mar 2021 | US | |
63156052 | Mar 2021 | US |