The present invention generally relates to semiconductor fabrication, and more particularly relates to methods for stripping photoresist and/or cleaning metal or metal silicide regions of semiconductor structures.
Electrical interconnect techniques typically require electrical connection between metal or other conductive layers, or regions, which are present at different elevations within or overlying a semiconductor substrate. Such interconnecting typically is conducted, in part, by etching a trench and/or a contact opening through insulating material to a lower elevation metal layer or metallized region. For example, contact openings commonly are fabricated to make conductive contact to a metal silicide region of a metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET). Trenches and contact openings also are conventionally fabricated to various metal layers to ultimately connect one semiconductor device element on one elevation to another semiconductor device element on another elevation.
Typically, as part of the process for fabricating a contact opening, a photoresist layer is deposited on the insulating material. The photoresist is patterned and etched to expose portions of the insulating layer and transfer the pattern to the insulating layer. The insulating layer is etched to the lower metal layer or region (hereinafter referred to collectively as “metal region”), forming a contact opening within the insulating layer to the metal region. The photoresist then is stripped from the insulating layer and a conductive material is deposited within the contact opening.
During the etching of the contact opening and the subsequent stripping of the photoresist, however, etching residue such as polymer from the photoresist can settle onto the exposed lower metal region. In addition, the metal region can be oxidized by exposure to oxygen in the environment. Some small resistance is associated with each contact between a conductor formed within the contact opening and a metal region. However, etching residue and metal oxide on the metal region increase that resistance, thereby decreasing device performance. Various methods have been used and suggested for cleaning the metal region after formation of the contact opening and before deposition of the conductive material within the contact opening. For example, ionized argon typically has been used to clean the metal region. However, ionized argon can result in sputtering of the metal region. Oxygen-based plasma also has been used, but oxygen-based plasma results in oxidation of the metal region. To reduce contact resistance and enhance device performance, the semiconductor industry is transitioning from cobalt silicide (CoSi2) to nickel silicide (NiSi) for MOSFET contacts. However, NiSi is quickly oxidized by oxygen plasma to form nickel oxide, which greatly increases the resistivity of the contact. The use of hydrogen-containing plasma has been suggested to clean the metal region. However, the use of hydrogen-containing plasma can be slower and less efficient than desired.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide improved methods for stripping photoresist and/or cleaning metal regions of semiconductor structures. It is also desirable to provide stripping and/or cleaning methods that do not result in sputtering or oxidation of the metal regions. In addition, it is desirable to provide methods for stripping photoresist and/or cleaning metal regions at enhanced stripping and cleaning rates. It also is desirable to provide methods for fabricating semiconductor structures utilizing such stripping and cleaning methods. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background of the invention.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and wherein:
The following detailed description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any theory presented in the preceding background of the invention or the following detailed description of the invention.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method 100 for stripping a photoresist and/or cleaning a metal layer or a metal region is illustrated in
The method 100 begins by positioning the metal region in a plasma reaction chamber apparatus (step 102). Preferably, the plasma reaction chamber apparatus is a remote (down-stream) plasma reaction chamber apparatus.
As noted above, the metal region typically is formed overlying a substrate 212, such as a semiconductor substrate. The semiconductor substrate is preferably a silicon substrate wherein the term “silicon substrate” is used herein to encompass the relatively pure silicon materials typically used in the semiconductor industry as well as silicon admixed with other elements such as germanium, carbon, and the like. Alternatively, the semiconductor substrate can be germanium, gallium arsenide, or other semiconductor material. The substrate may be a bulk silicon wafer, or may be a thin layer of silicon on an insulating layer (commonly know as silicon-on-insulator or SOI) that, in turn, is supported by a carrier wafer. The metal region may be disposed on or within the semiconductor substrate or may overlie the semiconductor substrate with various insulating, metal, and semiconductor layers disposed therebetween. A photoresist 224 may overlie an insulating layer disposed on the semiconductor substrate and exposing the metal region.
The substrate 212 is placed on the substrate support pedestal 220 and gas 202 is supplied to the quartz tube 206 through one or more entry ports 222. The gas 202 comprises hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2). In this regard, gas 202 comprises CO2 in an amount sufficient to increase the cleaning rate of plasma 204 but less than an amount that would result in substantial oxidation of the metal region 210. While CO2 comprises oxygen, the formation of metal oxide occurs at a much slower rate than if O2 is a component of gas 202. In one embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount no less than 0.1% by volume and no greater than 10% by volume of gas 202. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount of no less than 0.1% by volume and no greater than 5% by volume. In a more preferred embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount no less than 0.1% by volume and no greater than 1% by volume.
Method 100 may be implemented for any size substrate or semiconductor wafer. Most modern wafer fabrication facilities use either 200 mm or 300 mm wafers. Process conditions of method 100 may vary depending on the wafer size. Referring to
The metal region 210 then is exposed to the plasma (step 108). If present, the photoresist 224 also is exposed to the plasma. Substrate 212 may be temperature controlled and/or an RF bias may be applied. Upon production of the plasma, atomic, ionized, and excited H, H2, CO, and CO2 species flow from the plasma and interact with photoresist 224 and with the residue and oxide on the metal region 210. Showerhead 216, which is grounded, terminates the flow of some ions due to recombination and allows the flow of neutral species into processing chamber 214. The photoresist is converted to volatile hydrocarbon compounds that are desorbed from the insulating layer upon which it is disposed. The residue and any oxide on the surface of the metal region also are converted by the plasma to volatile species that are desorbed from the surface with minimal or no sputtering of the metal region and minimal or no oxidation of the metal region.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method 250 for stripping a photoresist and/or cleaning a metal region is illustrated in
The method 250 begins as does method 100 with the step of positioning the metal region in a remote plasma reaction chamber apparatus (step 102).
As described above with reference to method 100, the substrate 212 having metal region 210, and optionally photoresist 224, is placed on the substrate support pedestal 220 and gas 202 is supplied to the quartz tube 206 through entry port 222. The gas 202 comprises hydrogen and carbon dioxide. As described above, gas 202 comprises CO2 in an amount sufficient to increase the cleaning rate of plasma 204 but less than an amount that would result in substantial oxidation of the metal region 210. While CO2 comprises oxygen, the formation of metal oxide occurs at a much slower rate than if O2 is a component of gas 202. In one embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount no less than 0.1% and no greater than 10% of the total gas in the chamber, that is, H2, CO2, and the inert gas, described below. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount no less than 0.1% and no greater than 5%. In more preferred embodiment of the invention, CO2 is present in an amount no less than 0.1% and no greater than 1%.
Method 250 may be implemented for any size substrate or semiconductor wafer and process conditions of method 250 may vary depending on the wafer size. Referring to
An inert gas, illustrated by arrows 274, is introduced via gas inlet 272 upstream of the showerhead 216 and downstream from where plasma 204 is formed (step 252). Gas inlet 272 may be any type of gas inlet and may include multiple ports or jets to optimize mixing the inert gas with the plasma. The inert gas 274 may comprise, for example, argon (Ar) or helium (He). In a preferred embodiment, the inert gas comprises argon. The inert gas flow rate into processing chamber 214 is in the range of about 1 to about 20 times the hydrogen flow rate. In a preferred embodiment, the inert gas flow rate is in the range of about 19 to about 20 times the hydrogen flow rate. The inert gas mixes with the plasma 204. Showerhead 216 directs the plasma/inert gas mixture into processing chamber 214. Showerhead 216, which is grounded, terminates the flow of some ions by recombination and allows the flow of neutral species into processing chamber 214. Substrate 212 may be temperature controlled and/or an RF bias may be applied.
The metal region 210 then is exposed to the plasma/inert gas mixture (step 254). If present, the photoresist 224 also is exposed to the plasma/inert gas mixture. Atomic, ionized, and excited H, H2, CO, and CO2 species flow from the plasma and interact with the photoresist and the residue and oxide on the metal region 210. The photoresist is converted to volatile hydrocarbons that are desorbed from the insulating layer upon which it is disposed. The residue and oxide also are converted by the plasma to volatile species that are desorbed from the metal region with minimal or no sputtering of the metal region and minimal or no oxidation of the metal region.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the apparatus does not include showerhead 216. In these embodiments, the inert gas inlets 272 introduce the inert gas directly into the processing chamber 214 where it mixes with the plasma upstream of substrate 212.
Referring to
A surface portion 304 of the substrate 322 is doped with P-type conductivity determining impurities for the fabrication of an n-channel MOSFET or with N-type conductivity determining impurities for the fabrication of P-channel MOSFET. Portion 304 can be impurity doped, for example, by the implantation and subsequent thermal annealing of dopant ions such as boron and arsenic.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a layer 306 of a silicide-forming metal is deposited over the structure and in contact with the exposed portion 304. The silicide-forming metal typically comprises cobalt, nickel, rhenium, ruthenium, palladium or any other suitable metal and is deposited to a thickness in the range of about 5 nm to about 20 nm. The silicide-forming metal can be deposited, for example, by plasma vapor deposition (PVD) or electrochemical deposition.
Referring to
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the method continues with photolithographically patterning and etching the insulating material layer 310 to expose a portion of metal silicide 308. In this regard, a photoresist 312 is formed overlying the insulating material layer 310 and is patterned by conventional photolithography processing to form an opening 314, as illustrated in
Referring to
A thin layer of a first conductive material, such as a barrier layer, typically is deposited within contact opening 316 followed by deposition of a second conductive material, such as tungsten or copper or an alloy thereof, to form a conductive contact to metal silicide 308. Accordingly, semiconductor structure 300 can be moved to another processing chamber, such as a PVD or CVD chamber, within which the conductive material can be deposited. However, during transition of semiconductor structure 300 between processing apparatuses, such as during the transition from a photoresist stripping tool to a PVD system, semiconductor structure 300 may be exposed to an ambient environment. Exposure to the ambient environment may result in re-oxidation of the exposed metal silicide portion along with the deposition of other contaminants. In addition, semiconductor structure 300 may be stored for a period of time, during which oxides may form and other contaminants may deposit. To remove such contamination before deposition of the conductive material, structure 300 again can be cleaned using cleaning method 100 or cleaning method 250 as described above. The cleaning method can be performed in a stand-alone plasma clean chamber and the semiconductor structure 300 can be protected from the environment during transition to a deposition chamber, or the method can be performed in a multi-chamber apparatus having a deposition chamber and a plasma clean chamber. Thus, cleaning method 100 or cleaning method 250 can be performed as a “post-clean” after formation of contact opening 316 and as a “pre-clean” before deposition of conductive material within contact opening 316. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Simultaneously with the removal of the second photoresist or, alternatively, after the second photoresist is removed, the exposed region 366 of first metal interconnect 352 can be cleaned as described above using any of the embodiments described above for method 100 or method 250 to remove any photoresist residue, oxides or other contaminants that may have formed or deposited on exposed region 366. In this regard, the semiconductor structure 350 is disposed within a plasma clean chamber on the support pedestal of the plasma reaction chamber and the pedestal is heated or adjusted to and maintained at a temperature in the range of about 200° C. and 450° C., preferably at a temperature in the range of about 270° C. and 350° C. As described above, a plasma is created from a gas comprising hydrogen and CO2. The exposed region 366 of first metal interconnect 352 is subjected to the plasma, indicated by arrows 368 and, if using cleaning method 250, to inert gas to remove oxides and contaminants from region 366. Any of the processing parameters described above for cleaning methods 100 and 250 can be used to clean region 366 using the respective method.
The semiconductor structure 350 then can be positioned within a deposition apparatus such as, for example, the Novellus INOVA® XT apparatus, for deposition of a conductive material within trench 364 and via 360. However, prior to deposition of the conductive material, exposed region 366 again may be cleaned using any of the embodiments described above for method 100 or method 250 to remove any oxides or other contaminates that may have formed or deposited on exposed region 366 during transfer of semiconductor structure 350 and storage thereof. A blanket layer of conductive material 370 then is deposited within via 360 and trench 364 in electrical contact with first metal interconnect 352 and overlying second insulating layer 358, as illustrated in
The method continues, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, with a cleaning of a surface 374 of second interconnect 372 using any of the above-described embodiments of method 100 or method 250 to remove any oxides or other contaminants that may have formed or deposited on surface 374. The semiconductor structure 350 is disposed within a plasma clean chamber on the support pedestal of the plasma clean chamber and the pedestal is heated or adjusted to and maintained at a temperature in the range of about 200° C. and 450° C., preferably at a temperature in the range of about 270° C. and 350° C. As described above, a plasma is created from a gas comprising hydrogen and CO2. The exposed surface 374 of second interconnect 374 is subjected to the plasma, indicated by arrows 376 and, if using cleaning method 250, to inert gas to remove oxides and contaminants from surface 374. Any of the processing parameters described above for cleaning methods 100 and 250 can be used to clean surface 374 using the respective method.
Referring to
Accordingly, methods for stripping photoresist and/or cleaning a metal region have been provided. The methods utilize a plasma formed from a gas comprising hydrogen and CO2. The presence of the CO2 increases the cleaning speed of the plasma without oxidizing the metal region or damaging the metal region by sputtering. An inert gas may be mixed with the plasma to reduce the required hydrogen flow rate while maintaining the photoresist strip rate and the metal region clean rate. While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description of the invention, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in an exemplary embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4201579 | Robinson et al. | May 1980 | A |
4357203 | Zelez | Nov 1982 | A |
4699689 | Bersin | Oct 1987 | A |
5122225 | Douglas | Jun 1992 | A |
5158644 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5292393 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5354386 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5593541 | Wong et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626678 | Sahin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633073 | Cheung et al. | May 1997 | A |
5660682 | Zhao et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5707485 | Rolfson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5767021 | Imai et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792269 | Deacon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811358 | Tseng et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814155 | Solis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817406 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820685 | Kurihara et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830775 | Maa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844195 | Fairbairn et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5900351 | Lutsic et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908672 | Ryu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911834 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968324 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980770 | Ramachandran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039834 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045618 | Raoux et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054379 | Yau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072227 | Yau et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077764 | Sugiarto et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083852 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086952 | Lang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098568 | Raoux et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107184 | Mandal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125788 | Hills et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127262 | Huang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129091 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130166 | Yeh | Oct 2000 | A |
6156149 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171945 | Mandal et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184134 | Chaudhary et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187072 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193802 | Pang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194628 | Pang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203657 | Collison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204192 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209484 | Huang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230652 | Tanaka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245690 | Yau et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277733 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281135 | Han et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287990 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303523 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6306564 | Mullee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319842 | Khosla et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324439 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340435 | Bjorkman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342446 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348725 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350701 | Yamazaki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358573 | Raoux et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361707 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365516 | Frenkel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395092 | Sugiarto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413583 | Moghadam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426304 | Chien et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448187 | Yau et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465964 | Taguchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6511903 | Yau et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511909 | Yau et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517913 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537422 | Sakuma et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537929 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541282 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555472 | Aminpur | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562544 | Cheung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562690 | Cheung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569257 | Nguyen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6593247 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596655 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6632735 | Yau et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638875 | Han et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6660656 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660663 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663715 | Yuda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669858 | Bjorkman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680164 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680420 | Pang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689930 | Pang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693043 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709715 | Lang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720132 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730593 | Yau et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734115 | Cheung et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743737 | Yau et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764940 | Rozbicki et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770556 | Yau et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787452 | Sudijono et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800571 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806207 | Huang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6837967 | Berman et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848455 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858153 | Bjorkman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869896 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900135 | Somekh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902682 | Shang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6930061 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7023092 | Yau et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070657 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7074298 | Gondhalekar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7160821 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186648 | Rozbicki et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7202176 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205249 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227244 | Bjorkman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7288484 | Goto et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7297635 | Toda et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7344993 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7390755 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7432209 | Delgadino et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7465680 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468326 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7556712 | Yi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560377 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569492 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7585777 | Goto et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7595005 | Balasubramaniam | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597816 | Chang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7601272 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628864 | Moriya et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7651949 | Jo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7740768 | Goto et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8058178 | Goto et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8058181 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8129281 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
20010014529 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020000202 | Yuda et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045331 | Aminpur | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078976 | Nguyen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090827 | Yokoshima | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111041 | Annapragada et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132486 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139775 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185151 | Qingyuan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187643 | Gu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197870 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045115 | Fang | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045131 | Verbeke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040084412 | Waldfried et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040248414 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050079723 | Niimi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050106888 | Chiu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050158667 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196967 | Savas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060046482 | Verhaverbeke | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102197 | Chiang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138399 | Itano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154471 | Minami | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163202 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060191478 | Gondhalekar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201623 | Yoo | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060289384 | Pavel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070068900 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070144673 | Yeom | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070178698 | Okita et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224826 | Delgadino et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070281491 | Kamp | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026589 | Hubacek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080102646 | Kawaguchi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090053901 | Goto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056875 | Goto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090200268 | Tappan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221148 | Uda et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100015812 | Nishikawa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110139175 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139176 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143548 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1081754 | Jul 2001 | EP |
2007019367 | Jan 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
S.Wolf et al. Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, (1986), Lattice Press, pp. 166-173. |
Kikuchi et al., Native Oxide Removal on Si Surfaces by NF3-Added Hydrogen and Water Vapor Plasma Downstream Treatment, Jpn J. Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (1994), pp. 2207-2211, Part 1, No. 4B, Apr. 1994. |
Woody K. Chung, “Downstream Plasma Removal of Mobile Ion Impurity From SIO2”, Published Proceedings of the 8th International Plasma Processing Symposium, Fall 1990, 7 pages. |
Woody K, Chung, “Low Damage, Downstream RF Plasma Ashing of High Energy, Heavily Doped Implanted Resists,” Semicon Korea, Dec. 1989. |
A. Kalnitsky and W. K. Chung, “Characterization and Optimization of a Single Wafer Downstream Plasma Stripper,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, No. 9, Sep. 1988, pp. 2338-2341. |
Goto et al., “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653, filed Jul. 13, 2004. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 27, 2005. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jan. 10, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 26, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Oct. 11, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Apr. 5, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 15, 2007. |
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 23, 2007. |
Goto et al., “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273, filed Dec. 13, 2004. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273 mailed Nov. 28, 2006. |
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273. |
Goto et al., “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253, filed Feb. 27, 2007, pp. 1-28. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Dec. 23, 2008. |
Goto, et al., “Photoresist Strip Method For Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727, filed Sep. 21, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed Oct. 6, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed May 1, 2009. |
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727. |
Goto, et al., “High Dose Implantation Strip (HDIS) In H2 Base Chemistry,” Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305, filed Oct. 14, 2008. |
Goto, et al., “Photoresist Strip Method For Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461, filed Jul. 31, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jul. 17, 2009. |
Chen, et al., “Method For Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096, May 1, 2002. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 11, 2003. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 27, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jan. 15, 2008. |
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096. |
Chen, et al., “Method for Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095, filed Aug. 28, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Aug. 25, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Apr. 3, 2009. |
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. No. 12/111,095. |
Chen, et al., “Method for Post-Etch Cleans,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130, filed Jul. 31, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jan. 29, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,801 mailed Feb. 17, 2010. |
Cheung, et al., “Plasma Based Photoresist Removal System for Cleaning Post Ash Residue,” U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930, filed May 12, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 13, 2006. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 8, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 19, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jun. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Dec. 10, 2007. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jul. 21, 2008. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 20, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 17, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Feb. 26, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Nov. 5, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Dec. 8, 2010. |
Cheung, et al. “Ultra Low Silicon Loss High Dose Implant Strip,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
Cheung, et al. “Low Damage Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
Cheung, et al. “Enhanced Passivation Process to Protect Silicon Prior to High Dose Implant Strip,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503, filed Dec. 8, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Mar. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed May 26, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059388 mailed Jun. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059547 mailed Jul. 13, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/059517 mailed Jul. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Aug. 12, 2011. |
Allowed Claims as of Aug. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Aug. 12, 2011. |
Allowed Claims as of Aug. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Nov. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Nov. 10, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Oct. 28, 2011. |
Allowed Claims as of Oct. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Feb. 17, 2012. |
Allowed Claims as of Feb. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Apr. 26, 2012. |
Singapore Written Opinion and Search Report mailed Feb. 2, 2012, for Application No. 201104086-2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080248656 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |