Micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by hinges

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6392220
  • Patent Number
    6,392,220
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 2, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 21, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A monolithically fabricated micromachined structure (52) couples a reference frame (56) to a dynamic plate (58) or second frame for rotation of the plate (58) or second frame with respect to the reference frame (56). Performance of torsional oscillators or scanners (52) benefits greatly by coupling the frame (56) to the plate (58) or second frame with torsional flexure hinges (56) rather than torsion bars (54). Appendages (122), tethers (142) or an improved drive circuit enhance electrostatic drive stability of torsional oscillators (52). Wide and thin torsional flexure hinges (96) and isotopically pure silicon enhance thermal conductivity between the plate (58) and the frame (56). Dampening material bridging slots (232) adjacent to torsional flexure hinges (96) drastically reduce the dynamic member's Q. A widened section (252) of narrow torsional flexure hinges (96) permit inclusion of a torsion sensor (108). A dynamic member (58) that includes an actuator portion (302) performs light beam switching. Reflective coatings (76), wire grid polarizers (362), photo-detectors (372) and Fresnel lenses (376) enhance optical performance of the torsional scanners (58).
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates generally to monolithically fabricated micromachined structures and, more particularly, to micromachined structures in which a first frame is coupled to a plate or to a second frame for rotation of the plate or second frame with respect to the first frame about an axis.




2. Description of the Prior Art




A fundamental micromachined structure having many diverse uses is a torsional oscillator formed by a first frame that is coupled to a plate or to a second frame by diametrically opposed torsion bars that extend between the first frame and the plate or second frame. The torsion bars permit rotation of the second frame or the plate with respect to the first frame about an axis established by the torsion bars. Practical uses for this basic micromachined structure include optical beam micromachined torsional scanners having a reflective surface, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,629,790 (“the '790 patent”), that have uses in digital imaging, bar code reading and printing as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,553 (“the '553 patent”), and in magneto-optical recording as described in Published Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) International Patent Application WO 98/09289 entitled “Optical head Using Micro-Machined Elements” (“the '09289 PCT patent application”). Other practical applications for the basic micromachined structure occur in various other scientific and industrial systems such as rate gyroscopes described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,488,862, micro-flow meters described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,866, and profilometer and/or atomic force microscope (“AFM”) heads described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,549 that are used in surface inspection systems.




Collectively, the preceding patents describe various techniques for applying electrostatic and electromagnetic forces to the plate and/or second frame to energize rotation about the axis established by the torsion bars. The usefulness of the basic micromachined structure is greatly enhanced by integrating a torsion sensor into at least one of the torsion bars as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,618 (“the '618 patent”) for measuring rotation of the second frame or the plate with respect to the first frame about an axis established by the torsion bars.





FIG. 1

illustrates a torsional oscillator, i.e. a typical torsional scanner, such as that described in '790 patent which is referred to by the general reference character


52


. The torsional scanner


52


includes torsion bars


54


which extend inward from an encircling frame


56


to support a torsional scanner plate


58


and permit the plate


58


to rotate about an axis


62


established by the torsion bars


54


. The frame


56


rests upon an insulating substrate


64


which also carries a pair of electrically conductive electrodes


66


. A frame shaped spacer


68


, resting on the frame


56


, supports a membrane window


72


a short distance above the plate


58


. A light beam


74


, indicated by arrowed lines in

FIG. 1

, enters the torsional scanner


52


through the membrane window


72


, impinges upon and reflects from a mirror surface


76


on the plate


58


, and then exits the torsional scanner


52


through the membrane window


72


. A voltage V applied alternatively between the plate


58


and first one and then the other of the electrodes


66


that switches back and forth between the electrodes


66


at the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode of the plate


58


applies an electrostatic force to the plate


58


which urges it to rotate back and forth at that frequency about the axis


62


.




When using the basic micromachined structure for the optical beam torsional scanners


52


, a mirror surface


76


on the plate


58


or second frame deflects the light beam


74


, usually from a fixed light source, over an angle ranging from several degrees to tens of degrees. Such reflective torsional scanners


52


may be used for sweeping a beam of light back-and-forth at a frequency determined in part by a mechanical resonant frequency of the plate


58


or second frame. Alternatively, torsional scanners


52


may be used for moving or switching a point at which a beam of light impinges upon one or more other elements between two (2) or more alternative locations.




The '790 patent describes a critical mechanical vibrational mode spectrum which commercially practical torsional oscillators should possess. This mode spectrum is particularly desirable for sinusoidal oscillation of the torsional scanner


52


at video or even higher frequencies. The same mode spectrum is also advantageous when the torsional scanner


52


operates in a quasi-static mode such as when switching a point at which the light beam


74


impinges upon other elements. Operating in a quasi-static mode, the torsional scanner


52


rotates to and remains fixed in one orientation for some interval of time, and subsequently rotates swiftly through a relatively large angle to another orientation where it again remains fixed for some interval of time.




As illustrated in

FIG. 2

of U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,139 (“the '139 patent”), for applications in which torsional scanners


52


must rotate about one or two axes and must be packed very closely together it is often desirable to eliminate open space between the frame


56


and the plate


58


or second frame occupied by the length of the torsion bars


54


. This open space may be eliminated if the length of the torsion bars


54


is located within a “butterfly-shaped” frame as illustrated in the '139 patent, or within a butterfly-shaped plate


58


. However, since torsion bars


54


tend to be very long and slender even the butterfly-shaped plate


58


or frame such as that illustrated in the '139 patent may occupy too much space. Merely shortening the torsion bars


54


to reduce the space which they occupy can be disadvantageous because, in general, shortening the torsion bars


54


make them stiffer which raises the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode, or alternatively increases the force that must be applied to rotate either the plate


58


or the second frame about the axis


62


.




In many instances for various reasons energizing rotation of the plate


58


with low power electrostatic fields as described above is highly desirable. However, some applications for the torsional scanner


52


may require that the plate


58


rotate through large angles. Due to an electrostatic instability, using electrostatic force to energize rotation of the plate


58


, or a second frame, either statically or dynamically without feeding a signal that is proportional to angular rotation back to the circuit that generates the electrostatic drive signals generally limits the rotation angle of the plate


58


.




The electrostatic instability occurs because a restoring torque applied to the plate


58


by the torsion bars


54


increases linearly with rotation of the plate


58


while a driving torque generated by electrostatic attraction between the plate


58


and one of the electrodes


66


increases quadratically as the separation between them decreases. For sinusoidally oscillating electrostatically driven torsional scanners operating at the resonance frequency of their principal torsional vibrational mode, the electrostatic instability is of little concern because voltage applied between the electrodes


66


and the plate


58


is generally zero (0.0) when the plate


58


rotates nearest to the closest electrode


66


. That is, for sinusoidally oscillating electrostatically driven torsional scanners operating at the resonance frequency of their principal torsional vibrational mode, rotation of the plate


58


is out of phase with, i.e. lags, application of the alternating voltage V between the plate


58


and first one and then the other of the electrodes


66


. However, if for quasi-static operation a constant voltage V that exceeds some threshold value were applied across the plate


58


and one of the electrodes


66


, rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


becomes unstable. That is, if the voltage V applied between the plate


58


and one of the electrodes


66


has a particular value and responsive to that voltage the plate


58


rotates to a particular angle, unless restrained mechanically the plate


58


will continue rotating to a position nearest to the electrode


66


without any change in the voltage V.




The curves in

FIG. 2

graphically illustrate the phenomenon of electrostatic instability. The straight line


82


in

FIG. 2

, which slopes upward from left to right proportional to a torsional spring constant for the torsion bars


54


, indicates the amount of restoring torque that the torsion bars


54


apply to the plate


58


upon its rotation about the axis


62


to various angular orientations. A family of driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


in

FIG. 2

depict various driving torques applied to the plate


58


by increasingly higher fixed voltages Va, Vb and Vc between the plate


58


and the electrode


66


for various angles of rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


. The electrostatic attractive driving torque for a particular voltage Va or Vb in relation to the restoring torque illustrated by the straight line


82


are in equilibrium where driving torque curves


84




a


and


84




b


respectively intersect the straight line


82


at points labeled Aa and Ab. The first intersection point Aa for the driving torque curve


84




a


is a point of stable equilibrium at which further rotation of the plate


58


produces a larger restoring torque than the increase in driving torque applied to the plate


58


electrostatically. A second intersection point Ba is a point of unstable equilibrium because any increase in the rotation angle of the plate


58


increases the electrostatic driving torque more rapidly than the restoring torque. Therefore, if for the voltage represented by the driving torque curve


84




a


the plate


58


rotates to the angle at which the straight line


82


and driving torque curve


84




a


intersect at Ba, then unless restrained mechanically the plate


58


will continue rotating to a position nearest to the electrode


66


without any change in the voltage V.




If the fixed voltage V increases, for example from the driving torque curve


84




a


to the driving torque curve


84




b


, the driving torque applied electrostatically increases and the two points of intersection move closer together to the points Ab and Bb. However, as the voltage V applied across the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


continues increasing eventually the curves for restoring torque and driving torque become tangent. When tangency occurs, a stable point of intersection no longer exists and application of a fixed voltage V of that magnitude causes the plate


58


to instantaneously flip and slam into the underlying electrode


66


. This situation is illustrated by the driving torque curve


84




c


for which the two intersection points coincide at a single point AcBc. Consequently, for the voltage V illustrated by the driving torque curve


84




c


the plate


58


is no longer statically stable without feeding back a signal that is proportional to angular rotation to the circuit that generates the electrostatic drive signals. Consequently, without angular rotation feedback quasistatic rotation of the plate


58


cannot be controlled for many desirable angular orientations of the plate


58


.




Due to this electrostatic instability, electrostatically energized rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


is typically limited to approximately one-third (⅓) of the separation between the rest position of the plate


58


and the electrode


66


. For a particular size of plate


58


, obtaining an appreciable angle of rotation without feeding back an angular rotation signal to the electrostatic drive circuit requires increasing the spacing between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


. However, wider spacing between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


requires applying a higher driving voltage V across the plate


58


and the electrode


66


. However, the extent to which the voltage V applied between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


may increase is limited because that voltage cannot exceed the breakdown voltage between them. Alternatively, increasing the torsional spring constant substantially in regions of

FIG. 2

where the electrostatic instability occurs provides a stable equilibrium for larger angular rotations of the plate


58


about the axis


62


without increasing the spacing between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


.




The '09289 PCT patent application depicts and describes a torsional scanner


52


having a non-linear torsional spring constant. As illustrated in

FIG. 3

hereof and in

FIG. 3

of the '09289 PCT patent application, the torsional spring constant for the torsion bars


54


disclosed in the '09289 PCT patent application is rendered non-linear by attaching one or more tethers


86


to the plate


58


. The tethers


86


consist of springs made of nitride or oxide that have corrugations oriented parallel with the axis


62


established by the torsion bars


54


. As the plate


58


rotates about the axis


62


, the tethers


86


initially increase the torsional spring constant of the torsion bars


54


only slightly. However as the plate


58


rotates further about the axis


62


the torque which the tethers


86


apply increases rapidly thereby creating a non-linear torsional spring constant for the torsional scanner


52


depicted in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 3



a


illustrates a driving torque curve


92


for application of a fixed voltage V between the plate


58


and one of the electrodes


66


depicted in

FIG. 3. A

first straight line segment


94




a


in

FIG. 3



a


illustrates a hypothetical restoring torque applied only by the torsion bars


54


upon initial rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


up to a critical angular orientation. A second straight line segment


94




b


in

FIG. 3



a


illustrates the restoring torque that the torsion bars


54


together with the tethers


86


hypothetically apply upon rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


beyond the critical angular orientation. The differing slopes of the two line segments


94




a


and


94




b


in

FIG. 3



a


depict a torsional spring constant that changes from k


1


to k


2


at the critical angular orientation due to the restraint which the tethers


86


apply to the plate


58


. A low torsional spring constant k


1


permits good initial rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


. The change from the torsional spring constant k


1


to the torsional spring constant k


2


eliminates the electrostatic instability for larger angular rotations of the plate


58


about the axis


62


. However, as those skilled in the art will recognize, in reality the tethers


86


do not actually produce the abrupt change from a flexible to a stiff torsional spring constant suggested by

FIG. 3



a.






Nevertheless, for the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIG. 3

, if the torsional spring constant of the torsion bars


54


is small in comparison with the effect of the tethers


86


on the spring constant, then rotation of the plate


58


may be dominated by the tethers


86


. Moreover, if the tethers


86


do not restrain the plate


58


exactly symmetrically, they tend to bend it thus destroying its optical flatness. As noted in the '09289 PCT patent application, the torsional scanner


52


including the tethers


86


depicted in

FIG. 3

permits stable rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


only up to angles of plus or minus two degrees (∓2.0°) because the tethers


86


produce an extreme non-linearity in the torsional spring constant.




The '790 patent discloses advantages that inclusion of a box frame reinforcing rim around the plate


58


, or the second frame, provides for the torsional scanner


52


. The box frame reinforcing rim thickens the plate


58


, or the second frame, about their periphery while leaving the remainder of their structure thin. The box frame reinforcing rim maintains the plate


58


optically flat, and also provides differing thicknesses for the torsion bars


54


and the frame


56


thereby increasing the rigidity of the torsional scanner


52


. In comparison with a solid plate


58


or second frame, reinforcing the plate


58


, or the second frame, with a box frame also reduces the mass of the plate


58


, or the second frame, while preserving its moment of inertia. A large moment of inertia increases the Q of the torsional scanner


52


as illustrated by the analysis of Buser, et al. (Sens. & Act., A23, 1990, pg. 323).




A major concern in fabricating reflective torsional scanners


52


is the reflectivity and planarity of the mirror surface


76


throughout a range of operating temperatures. Increasing the reflectivity of or controlling the polarization of light reflected from the plate


58


may also require depositing dielectric coatings over the mirror surface


76


. Usually inorganic materials such as oxides, nitrides etc. deposited onto a metal coated mirror surface


76


yield the desired reflective properties. Because such inorganic material coatings must be at least 0.1 to 0.2 microns thick, the stress which they may apply to the plate


58


is a major concern, particularly since they must be deposited onto torsional scanners only a few microns thick.




For certain applications, torsional oscillators must dissipate a significant amount of heat from the plate


58


. For example, if rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the frame


56


about the axis


62


is energized electro-magnetically using a coil attached to the plate


58


, then the plate


58


must dissipate heat generated by an electric current flowing through the coil, i.e. must dissipate i


2


R heating. However, even if the plate


58


does not carry a coil because electrostatic force energizes rotation, reflecting a 100 milliwatt (mw) light beam


74


from a mirror surface


76


that is ninety-eight and one-half percent (98.5%) reflective, requires that the plate


58


must dissipate 1.5 mw of energy deposited there by the incident light beam


74


. Absorption of 1.5 mw of energy into 1.0 mm


2


of silicon, a relatively low thermal conductivity material, may raise the temperature of the plate


58


by twenty (20.0) to thirty (30.0) °C. above the surrounding ambient temperature. The temperature of the plate


58


increases even more dramatically if the plate


58


has poor thermal conductivity to the remainder of the torsional scanner


52


.




In many applications for torsional scanners


52


such as two dimensional (“2D”) pointing or scanning, sometimes several electrical leads must pass from the frame


56


to the plate


58


via the torsion bar


54


that includes a torsion sensor such as that as described in the '618 patent. The locations for these numerous electrical leads can be severely constrained by the width of the torsion bar


54


. Extremely narrow torsion bars


54


can also constrain placement of electrical leads and operation of a torsion sensor.




Various applications for reflective micromachined torsional scanners


52


, such as fiber optic switching, envision using the torsional scanner


52


for optically aligning a beam of light using stationary or quasi-stationary positioning along at least one axis of a 2D raster. Another non-parallel axis of rotation for the plate


58


may provide either periodic motion (sinusoidal, linear), or static or quasi-statically positioning for the light beam. Such applications may result in effectively switching a beam of light on or off by flipping the mirror surface


76


into the light beam's path. Usually for such applications it is desirable to flip the plate


58


into the light beam as swiftly as practicable. Further-more, after the mirror surface


76


intersects the light beam


74


, making small trimming adjustments in, i.e. tailoring, the angle at which the mirror surface


76


reflects the light beam may be advantageous or even required.




In fiber optic switching technologies, such compound motions of the plate


58


may provide tracking along one or two axes to keep a light beam on target. Such pointing applications may require that the light beam be deflected along at least one axis through a relatively large angle, and then held at a particular angle for an extended interval of time while dissipating a small amount of power in the torsional scanner


52


. For such quasi-static pointing applications the plate


58


must be held stationary after rotating through a very large angle, e.g. 5° to 45°. Such large angular rotations are difficult to achieve electrostatically, because, as explained previously, large electrostatically energized rotations of the plate


58


inherently require a very large spacing between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


. Such large angular rotations are also difficult to achieve electro-magnetically because the magnetic field generated by a coil carried on the plate


58


becomes reoriented with respect to an external unidirectional magnetic field as the plate


58


rotates about the axis


62


. Consequently, electro-magnetically energized quasi-static rotation of the plate


58


through large angles normally requires that the coil carry very large electrical current while holding the plate


58


at a fixed angular rotation. As described above, such a large electrical current significantly raises the temperature of the plate


58


.




For some applications of torsional oscillator, as disclosed in the '139 and '790 patents it is advantageous to include one or more light detecting elements, usually as photo-diodes, in the torsional scanner


52


, perhaps locating them on the plate


58


. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,324 (“the '324 patent”), including a polarized light detector is particularly advantageous for some image processing applications. Similarly, some application for torsional oscillators will likely require detecting Faraday rotation of a planar polarized light for sensing the presence or absence of magnetically recorded data. The '324 patent discloses a two dimensional (“2D”) ensemble of receiver assemblies. Each of the receiver assemblies includes four (4) light detectors each of which responds to light polarized in a different orientation. The '324 patent discloses that such polarizers may be formed by wire grids disposed immediately adjacent to the light detector, or at an appropriate location in the optical system. The cost of the imaging system disclosed in the '324 patent could be significantly reduced if it were possible to reduce the ensemble of receiver assemblies to a single receiver assembly.




The '790, '553, '618, '139 and '324 patents, and the '09289 PCT patent application are hereby incorporated by reference.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the present invention is to provide improved structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges.




Another object of the present invention is to improve operating characteristics of micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges.




Another object of the present invention is to provide torsional flexure hinges for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation that are more compact than conventional, unfolded torsion bars.




Another object of the present invention is to provide torsional flexure hinges for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation which exhibit increased separation between a frequency of a member's principal torsional vibrational mode and frequencies of that member's other vibrational modes.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges for which torque required to rotate a member about an axis established by the torsional flexure hinges increases non-linearly with increasing angular rotation of the micromachined members.




Another object of the present invention is to provide an electrostatic drive circuit for applying a drive signal that urges micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges to rotate about an axis established by the torsional flexure hinges which changes non-linearly with angular deflection of the micromachined members.




Another object of the present invention is to decrease the electrostatic potential required for rotating micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges having enhanced thermal conductivity.




Another object of the present invention is to ruggedize torsional flexure hinges that couple micromachined members for relative rotation which include a torsion sensor.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for enhancing optical reflectivity of micromachined members which does not alter the micromachined member's flatness.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for optically reflective micromachined members which permit tailoring reflective characteristics of a mirror surface.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a micromachined member which includes a polarization-sensitive scanned photo-detector.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges together with an electronic drive therefor that urges members to rotate about an axis established by the torsional flexure hinges swiftly and then immediately fixes the micromachined member at a specified angular rotation.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges together with a lower power consumption electronic drive therefor that urges members to rotate about an axis of the torsional flexure hinges swiftly and then immediately fixes the micromachined member in a specified angular orientation.




Another object of the present invention is to provide structures for micromachined members coupled for relative rotation by torsional flexure hinges together with a lower power consumption electronic drive therefor that permits trimming the orientation of a member after that member has been rotated through a specified angle and been fixed at that orientation.




Briefly, the present invention includes an improved integrated, micromachined structure that has a reference member, a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member, and a dynamic member supported by the pair of torsional flexure hinges from the reference member. The torsional flexure hinges support the dynamic member from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges. As used herein, the phrase torsional flexure hinge, when applied most broadly, encompasses a conventional unfolded torsion bar, and also encompasses hinge structures in which one or more hinge segments included in that structure do not experience pure torsion when the dynamic member rotates about the axis established by the torsional flexure hinges. The reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member are all monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate. The integrated micromachined structure also includes drive means for imparting rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges. The drive means may apply torque electrostatically or electro-magnetically to the dynamic member, either singly or in combination.




The improved micromachined structure in one embodiment forms at least one of the torsional flexure hinges by coupling together first ends of at least three torsion-bar segments. The first end of each torsion-bar segment is located along the multi-segment torsional flexure hinge between the reference member and the dynamic member. In another embodiment, the improved micromachined structure forms at least one of the torsional flexure hinges by disposing a bifilar beam between the reference member and the dynamic member. The bifilar beam is disposed symmetrically on opposite sides of the axis for rotation of the dynamic member established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges.




Another embodiment of the improved micromachined structure that enhances electrostatic stability includes an appendage having a first end that attaches to one of the torsional flexure hinges at a point along the torsional flexure hinge that is located between the reference member and the dynamic member. The appendage projects outward from the torsional flexure hinge and is shaped so that upon sufficient rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member a projecting end of the appendage contacts a stop having a fixed relationship with the reference member. When the projecting end of the appendage contacts the stop the torsional spring constant of the torsional flexure hinge changes. In another embodiment the improved micromachined structure includes a tether that is coupled at a first end to the reference member and at a second end to one of the torsional flexure hinges at a point along the torsional flexure hinge that is located between the reference member and the dynamic member. Upon sufficient rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member the tether changes the torsional spring constant of the torsional flexure hinge. In yet another electrostatically energized embodiment, the improved micromachined structure includes a torsion sensor that is adapted for producing a signal responsive to angular rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member. The signal produced by the torsion sensor is fed back to the drive means for altering the drive signal which electrostatically energizes rotation of the dynamic member.




An improved torsional oscillator increases torque applied electrostatically between an electrode and a dynamic member that includes a reinforcing rim by sharpening a tip of the reinforcing rim immediately adjacent to the electrode which enhances the electric field between them. In another improved torsional oscillator, to enhance the Q of the torsional oscillator a hollow first cavity in the dynamic member, that is encircled by the reinforcing rim, is disposed adjacent to a hollow second cavity that is formed in a substrate and which opens toward the first cavity formed into the dynamic member. In another improved torsional scanner either the reference member or the dynamic member includes a slot formed therein that is disposed alongside one of the torsional flexure hinges. Damping material disposed across the slot and contacting the adjacent torsional flexure hinge near the reference member reduces the torsional oscillator's Q. Yet another improved torsional oscillator adds auxiliary driving-plates along opposite sides of the torsional flexure hinges between the dynamic member and the reference member. The auxiliary driving-plates are coupled to the torsional flexure hinge adjacent to the dynamic member and have a combined width perpendicular to the rotation axis which is less than a width of the dynamic member perpendicular thereto. In this improved torsional oscillator, the drive means applies an electrostatic drive signal between the auxiliary driving-plates and to electrodes disposed adjacent thereto.




In another improved torsional oscillator, the torsional flexure hinges have a width-to-thickness (w:t) ratio that exceeds four-to-one (4:1) to increase thermal conductivity between the dynamic member and the reference member in comparison with narrower and thinner torsional flexure hinges having an equivalent torsional spring constant. Further increasing the width-to-length (w:1) ratio of the torsional flexure hinges to greater than one-to-two (1:2) provides a non-linear torsional spring constant that improves electrostatic stability. Another improved torsional oscillator improves thermal conductivity between the dynamic member and the reference member by fabricating them from isotopically pure 14Si


28


silicon.




In another improved torsional oscillator the dynamic member includes a stress relief cut that almost completely encircles a decoupled portion of the dynamic member. The stress relief cut establishes beams for supporting that decoupled portion of the dynamic member from a surrounding portion thereof whereby stress is decoupled between the decoupled portion and the surrounding portion. In another improved torsional scanner both front and back sides of the dynamic member have a reflective mirror coating applied thereto to balance any stress applied to the dynamic member. In another improved torsional oscillator at least one of the torsional flexure hinges includes a widened section having a torsion sensor disposed there which produces a signal responsive to angular rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member.




In another improved torsional scanner adapted for switching a light beam the drive means initially energizes rotation of the dynamic member about the axis electro-magnetically with a current pulse. The current pulse impulsively starts the dynamic member rotating about the axis established by the torsional flexure hinges. After the dynamic member rotates near to a pre-established orientation, the drive means holds the dynamic member in the pre-established orientation with an electrostatic force.




In another improved torsional oscillator the dynamic member carries a wire grid polarizer disposed adjacent to a photo-detector so that illumination incident on the photo-detector must traverse the wire grid polarizer before impinging upon the photo-detector.




These and other features, objects and advantages will be understood or apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment as illustrated in the various drawing figures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional elevational view illustrating a prior art torsional oscillator in the form of a torsional scanner as described in the '790 patent adapted for applying a torque electrostatically for rotating a mirror plate about a rotation axis established by supporting torsion bars;





FIG. 2

is a graph which illustrates the electrostatic driving torque and the torsion bar restoring torque as a function of plate rotation angle for a torsional oscillator, such as that depicted in

FIG. 1

, in which the torsion bars have a fixed torsional spring constant;





FIG. 3

is a perspective diagram of a prior art torsional scanner that reproduces

FIG. 3

of the '09289 PCT patent application;





FIG. 3



a


is a graph which illustrates the electrostatic driving torque and the restoring torque as functions of plate rotation angle for a torsional oscillator, such as that depicted in

FIG. 3

, in which the torsion bars exhibit a varying torsional spring constant;





FIGS. 4



a


and


4




b


are plan views depicting folded torsional flexure hinges having a torsion sensor integrated therein which are more compact and which exhibit a vibrational mode spectrum which is improved in comparison with those exhibited by a conventional, unfolded torsion bar;





FIG. 5



a


is a graph illustrating the torsional spring constant of a beam for varying width to thickness ratios;





FIG. 5



b


is a plan view of a unfolded, bifilar torsion bar which employs the torsional spring constant depicted in

FIG. 5



a


advantageously to obtain improved vibrational mode spectrum characteristics;





FIG. 6



a


is a plan view illustrating a conventional, unfolded torsion bar;





FIG. 6



b


is a plan view illustrating a torsional flexure hinge which exhibits improved characteristics by including torsion bar segments having various width to thickness ratios both larger and smaller than one (1:1) that are selected to optimize the torsional flexure hinge's performance;





FIGS. 7



a


and


7




b


are plan views illustrating how big-filar torsional flexure hinges which rely mostly on bending provide very flexible rotation for the plate;





FIG. 7



c


is a plan view of a trifilar torsional flexure hinge which combines the bifilar torsional flexure hinge depicted in

FIG. 7



a


with the conventional, unfolded torsion bar depicted in

FIG. 6



a;







FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


are respectively plan and cross-sectional elevational views that illustrate using free-moving appendages attached to the torsion bars together with stops for changing the torsional spring constant abruptly thereby increasing the electrostatic stability of the torsional oscillator;





FIG. 8



c


is a graph, similar to those of

FIGS. 2 and 3



a


which illustrates the electrostatic driving torque and the torsion bar restoring torque as functions of plate rotation angle for a torsional oscillator such as that depicted in

FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


that includes appendages a multi-segmented torsional spring constant;





FIGS. 9



a


and


9




b


are respectively plan and cross-sectional elevational views that illustrate using tethers for coupling the torsion bars to the frame for changing the torsional spring constant abruptly thereby increasing the electrostatic stability of the torsional oscillator;





FIG. 9



c


is a plan view depicting in greater detail a corrugated compression spring that may be included in the tethers depicted in

FIGS. 9



a


and


9




b;







FIG. 9



d


is a cross-sectional view of the spring depicted in

FIG. 9



c


illustrating stops that may be included in the corrugations;





FIG. 10 and 10



a


are diagram depicting cross-sectional elevational view illustrating a torsional scanner and timing diagrams illustrating electrostatic, quasi-static drive signals applied respectively to electrodes included in the torsional scanner;





FIG. 10



b


is a block diagram depicting a circuit for generating electrostatic driving signals responsive to a signal received from a torsion sensor that improves electrostatic stability by compensating quasi-static driving signals for rotation of the plate about the axis with respect to the frame;





FIG. 10



c


illustrates timing diagrams, similar to those depicted in

FIG. 10



b


, for electrostatic, quasi-static drive signals such as the circuit illustrated in

FIG. 10



b


generates for application respectively to electrodes of the torsional scanner depicted in

FIG. 10



a;







FIG. 11

is a graph, similar to those of

FIGS. 2

,


3




a


and


8




c


, which illustrates the electrostatic driving torque and the torsion bar restoring torque as functions of plate rotation angle for a torsional oscillator, such as that depicted in

FIG. 1

, when rotation of the plate is energized electrostatically by driving signals produced by the circuit depicted in

FIG. 7

;





FIG. 12



a


is a graph which illustrated one-half of the surface and cross-section of a box frame reinforcing rim frequently incorporated into a plate or frame of a torsional oscillator, and which also illustrates a portion of an elliptical cylinder the surface of which approximates the surface of the box frame reinforcing rim;





FIG. 12



b


is a graph illustrating a magnitude for a horizontal (X-axis) component of electrostatic field between the box frame and an adjacent electrode, illustrated in

FIG. 12



a


, for increasing distance along the box frame's surface from the electrode;





FIGS. 12



c


and


12




d


are cross-sectional views illustrating electrode configurations which may be used to further enhance the electrostatic attraction exhibited by a torsional oscillator that includes a box frame having sharpened tips;





FIGS. 13



a


and


13




b


are cross-sectional views illustrating a geometry for a plate having a box frame which reduces squeeze film damping of plate rotation;





FIG. 13



c


is a cross-sectional view illustrating how squeeze film damping of plate rotation may be further reduced;





FIG. 13



d


is a cross-sectional view illustrating a torsional oscillator with a reduced box frame and overhanging mirror surface that permits reduced driving voltage;





FIG. 13



e


is a plan view illustrating driving plates integrated along longitudinal edges of the torsion bars which permits using lower driving voltage;





FIG. 14

is an elevational view illustrating a preferred type of silicon wafer substrate used in fabricating torsional oscillators, particularly torsional scanners;





FIGS. 15



a


and


15




b


are plan views illustrating butterfly-shaped configurations for plates and frames of micromachined, silicon torsional scanners that are adapted for damping their high Q;





FIGS. 16



a


and


16




b


are plan views illustrating torsion bars having a widened section to provide additional surface area on the torsion bar for a torsion sensor;





FIGS. 17



a


and


17




b


are perspective views illustrating different arrangements for vacuum depositing a metallic mirror surface onto a silicon wafer substrate;





FIG. 18

is a cross-sectional view of a torsional scanner in which the mirror surface of the plate has been conformally coated with parylene to provide a nearly stress free layer which improves optical performance without bending the plate;





FIGS. 18



a


and


18




b


respectively illustrated performance enhancements that may be obtained by overcoating a mirror surface with a selected thickness of parylene;





FIGS. 19



a


and


19




b


respectively are plan and cross-sectional elevational views of torsional scanner adapted for light beam switching applications that includes both clamping and adjustment mechanisms which uses both electrostatic and electromagnetic actuation;





FIGS. 20



a


and


20




b


are cross-sectional elevational views, similar to the view of

FIG. 19



b


, that illustrate alternative embodiments of the torsional scanner clamping and adjustment mechanisms;





FIG. 20



c


is a plan view of an adjustment mechanism adapted for use with the torsional scanner illustrated in

FIGS. 19



a


and


19




b


taken along the line


20




c





20




c


in

FIG. 19



a;







FIG. 21

is a plan view of a torsional oscillator that carries a wire grid polarized-light photo-detector on the plate;





FIG. 22



a


is a plan view of the wire grid polarized-light photo-detector illustrated in

FIG. 21

;





FIG. 22



b


is a cross-sectional view of the wire grid polarized-light photo-detector taken along the line


22




b





22




b


in

FIG. 21



a;







FIG. 23

is a plan view of a torsional oscillator having photo-detectors located in the reference member, i.e. the frame;





FIG. 24



a


is a plan view of a torsional oscillator that carries a Fresnel lens formed into the dynamic member, i.e. the plate; and





FIG. 24



b


is a partial cross-sectional view of the Fresnel lens carried on the dynamic member taken along the line


24




b





24




b


in

FIG. 24



a.













DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Smaller and Better Performing Torsional Oscillators


52






As described in the '790 patent, the plate


58


of torsional oscillators, such as the torsional scanner


52


, exhibit a plurality of vibrational modes. Those vibrational modes include a principal torsional vibrational mode about the axis


62


, a vertical shaking vibrational mode, a vertical rocking vibrational mode, a lateral shaking vibrational mode, and a lateral rocking vibrational mode. Each of these vibrational modes of the plate


58


has a vibrational frequency which is determined by the physical characteristics of the torsional scanner


52


. As disclosed in the '790 patent, operation of the torsional scanner


52


is significantly enhanced if the vibrational frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode is lower by at least 20% than the vibrational frequency of any other vibrational mode of the plate


58


. As described in greater detail below, the separation between the vibrational frequencies of the various vibrational modes of the plate


58


may be improved with a smaller frame


56


and plate


58


if hinges supporting the plate


58


are made by coupling together ends of at least three (3) hinge segments with the coupled ends being located along the hinge between the torsion bar


54


and the plate


58


. For some applications, folded hinges formed in this way often exhibit a mode spectrum which is substantially better than that of torsion bars


54


having a conventional, unfolded shape because the frequencies of the vertical and lateral vibration modes of the folded torsion bar


54


are spaced further from the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode.




As depicted in

FIG. 4



a


, in one embodiment a T-shaped folded torsional flexure hinge


96


for supporting the plate


58


from the frame


56


is made up of three (3) basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


. Each of the basid hinge-segments


102


has a longitudinal axis


98


which is not oriented perpendicular to the axis


62


. For the centrally located basic hinge-segment


102




b


, the longitudinal axis


98


is colinear with the axis


62


. An intermediate region


104


of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


couples together immediately adjacent ends


106


of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


. In comparison with the basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


, both the frame


56


, the plate


58


, and the intermediate region


104


are thick and massive enough to be considered inflexible. For applications in which the plate


58


must move swiftly or oscillate, the plate


58


is preferably shaped symmetrically with respect to the axis


62


thus positioning a center of mass of the plate


58


on the axis


62


. The basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


are usually shaped identically and have the same thickness as basic hinge-segment


102




b


. However, typically the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


are narrower than the basic hinge-segment


102




b


such as approximately one-half (½) the width of the basic hinge-segment


102




b


. For the torsional flexure hinge


96


depicted in

FIG. 4



a


, the basic hinge-segment


102




b


only twists while the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


both twist and bend.




The basic hinge-segment


102




b


of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


may include a torsion sensor


108


, such as that described in the '618 patent, for measuring angular rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


with respect to the frame


56


. The torsion sensor


108


located in the basic hinge-segment


102




b


is identical to that disclosed in the '618 patent. However, depending on specific characteristics of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


, the sensitivity of the torsion sensor


108


located in the basic hinge-segment


102




b


to rotation of the plate


58


will differ from a torsion sensor


108


located in a conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


.




The torsional stiffness of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


illustrated in

FIG. 6



a


approaches that of the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


of comparable width and thickness of the basic hinge-segment


102




b


and having a length equal to the combined lengths of the basic hinge-segment


102




b


and one of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


. However as is readily apparent from the illustration in

FIG. 6



a


, the overall length of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


including the intermediate region


104


is approximately one-half (½) that of the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


. During rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the frame


56


, basic hinge-segment


102




b


experiences nearly pure torsion, while the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


experience both torsion and bending stresses. If the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


are sufficiently close together, the bending stress can often be neglected when configuring the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


for a specific torsional scanner


52


.




Compared to a conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


of length “1,” the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


exhibits greater vertical stiffness, and the frequencies of the vertical and lateral vibration modes of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


are separated further from the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode. Because the basic hinge-segment


102




b


and the paired basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


both have lengths equal to one-half (½) of a comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


, their vertical spring constants are only one-eighth (⅛) that of a comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


. However, since the intermediate region


104


couples the basic hinge-segment


102




b


and the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


in series, the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


is only four (4) times stiffer than the comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


. The increased vertical stiffness of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


, in comparison with the comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


, raises the resonant frequency of the vertical vibration mode by a factor of nearly two (2). The folded torsional flexure hinge


96


also increases the separation between the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode and the frequencies of the lateral and rocking vibration modes, although not as dramatically. Thus, the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


improves the separation between the frequencies of the various vibrational modes of the plate


58


.




The improved characteristics of the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


may be used advantageously in microfabrication of torsional scanners


52


for severely restricted configurations. For example, the torsional flexure hinge


96


can be made more flexible for a chosen vertical stiffness thereby increasing angular rotation of the plate


58


, or lowering power dissipation if rotation of the plate


58


is energized electro-magnetically. Alternatively, for a particular flexibility the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


increases the vertical stiffness thereby increasing shock resistance of the torsional scanner


52


. Thus, the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


provides important advantages for the design of torsional scanners


52


.




Furthermore, the torsional flexure hinge


96


may be subdivided into three (3) segments rather than two (2) segments thereby reducing its overall length even more, and further improving its vertical stiffness. Accordingly, the folded torsional flexure hinge


96


depicted in

FIG. 4



b


adds to the basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


two (2) supplemental hinge-segments


102




d


and


102




e


together with intermediate regions


104




a


and


104




b


that respectively couple ends


112


of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


with immediately adjacent ends


112


of the supplemental hinge-segments


102




d


and


102




e


. Each of the hinge-segments


102




a


-


102




e


typically have lengths that are one-third (⅓) the length “1” of a comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


. In plan view, each pair of combined supplemental hinge-segments


102




d


or


102




e


, intermediate regions


104




a


or


104




b


and basic hinge-segments


102




a


or


102




c


appear U-shaped. If in comparison with a comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


the thickness of the hinge-segments


102




a


-


102




e


are the same, the width of the basic hinge-segment


102




b


is the same, and the widths of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


and the supplemental hinge-segments


102




d


and


102




e


are approximately one-half (½) that of the basic hinge-segment


102




b


, then folded torsional flexure hinge


96


depicted in

FIG. 4



b


has a vertical stiffness approximately nine (9) times greater than that of the comparable, conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


.




Throughout the following description of various other aspects concerning micromachined members coupled for relative rotation, generally folded torsional flexure hinges


96


of the types described above may be used instead of the conventional unfolded torsion bars


54


described there. Moreover, any other torsional flexure hinge, appropriately configured to produce a restoring torque about an axis established by a pair of such hinges upon rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the frame


56


and which are monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate together with the frame


56


and plate


58


, may be used instead of the conventional unfolded torsion bars


54


employed throughout the following description.




The frequencies of the various vibrational modes of the plate


58


reflect the geometry of the torsion bar


54


.

FIG. 5



a


depicts the non-linear relationship which exists between a rectangular beam's torsional spring constant and a ratio of the rectangular beam's width-to-thickness (w:t). For a micromachined beam such as a conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


having a width-to-thickness (w:t) less than 2:1, as illustrated by the graph in

FIG. 5



a


reducing the width of the beam by one-half (½) reduces the torsional spring constant by more than one-half (½). As shown there, reducing by one-half (½) the width of a torsion beam having a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of two-to-one (2:1) reduces the beam's torsional spring constant by a factor of three (3.0).





FIG. 5



b


illustrates an unfolded, bifilar torsion bar


54


that is formed by two (2) beams


114


disposed symmetrically on opposite sides of the axis


62


each of which beams


114


has a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of one-to-one (1:1) For the reasons discussed above in connection with

FIG. 5



a


, the unfolded bifilar torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 5



b


exhibits a torsional spring constant which is approximately sixty percent (60%) that of a torsion bar


54


formed by a single beam of the same thickness that has the same cross-sectional area as the combined beams


114


, i.e. a single beam torsion bar


54


having a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of two-to-one (2:1). Thus, the unfolded, bifilar torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 5



b


exhibits a frequency for the principal torsional vibrational mode that is approximately seventy-five percent (75%) that of the equivalent, conventional, single-beam, unfolded torsion bar


54


while exhibiting an identical frequency for the vertical vibrational mode. Consequently, any conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


having a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) between three-to-one (3:1) or less can usually be advantageously replaced by an equivalent bifilar torsion bar


54


, such as that illustrated in

FIG. 5



b


, while maintaining the same vertical stiffness.




In general, micromachined torsion bars


54


have a uniform thickness along their entire length. Usually this results in the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


having a width that exceeds its height. Therefore, the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


generally has a lateral stiffness which exceeds its vertical stiffness, and correspondingly a frequency for the lateral vibration mode that exceeds the frequency for the vertical vibration mode. Usually a torsion bar


54


having identical lateral and vertical stiffness is desirable if such a geometry permits reducing the torsional spring constant of the torsion bar


54


. If a beam's width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) is less than one (1.0), then the lateral, rather than vertical, stiffness dominates. By combining beams of differing width-to-thickness ratios (w:t), both less than and greater than one (1.0), it becomes possible to advantageously improve the characteristics of the folded torsion bar


54


.





FIG. 6



a


illustrates a conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


. The torsion bar


54


may, for example have a length “1” of 400 microns, a thickness of 10 microns and a width of 20 microns, i.e. a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of two-to-one (2:1). Assume also that the frequency of the vertical vibrational mode is higher by a factor of three (3) than the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode. Based on the width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of two-to-one (2:1) for the torsion bar


54


, the frequency of the lateral vibrational mode is then a factor of six (6) higher than the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode.





FIG. 6



b


illustrates an adaptation of the folded torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 4



a


which uses the beams


114


for both of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


. By appropriately combining in the basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


beams having differing width-to-thickness ratios (w:t) that are both less than and greater than one-to-one (1:1), it becomes possible to approximately equalize the stiffness of the torsion bar


54


both vertically and laterally, while concurrently reducing the overall torsional spring constant of the folded torsion bar


54


.




For the configuration illustrated in

FIG. 6



b


, all the basic hinge-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c


torsion bars


54


are


10


micron thick. But in comparison with the conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


illustrated in

FIG. 6



a


, the beams


114


making up each of the bifilar basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


have a width, i.e.


5


.


0


microns, that is only one-fourth (¼) that of basic hinge-segment


102




b


, i.e. 20.0 microns. Also, the beams


114


have a length, i.e. 135.0 microns, that is one-third (⅓) that of the conventional unfolded 400.0 micron long torsion bar


54


illustrated in

FIG. 6



a


. The folded torsion bar


54


illustrated in

FIG. 6



b


exhibits substantially the same vertical stiffness as the conventional unfolded torsion bar


54


illustrated in

FIG. 6



a


. However, the extremely narrow beams


114


of the bifilar basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


have a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) of (0.5:1.0) which drastically reduces their torsional spring constant as indicated by the graph of

FIG. 5



a


, while concurrently reducing the lateral stiffness of the basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


. In a simplified way of understanding the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



b


, the wider basic hinge-segment


102




b


of the torsion bar


54


maintains the lateral stiffness of the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



a


while the bifilar basic hinge-segments


102




a


and


102




c


provide torsional flexibility matching that of the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



a.






In comparison with the conventional, unfolded torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



a


, the torsional spring constant of the folded torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



b


is twenty-two percent (22%) lower, and the frequencies of the vertical and lateral vibrational modes are both approximately eight and two-tenths (8.2) times higher in frequency than the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode. Thus, the torsion bar


54


illustrated in

FIG. 6



b


provides the torsional scanner


52


with a vastly enhanced mode-spectrum with greater separation between the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode and the vertical and lateral vibrational modes than that exhibited by the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



a


. The advantages provided by the configuration of the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 6



a


can be used to make the torsional scanner


52


more rugged for the same torsional spring constant, or to maintain the same strength for the torsional scanner


52


while reducing the torsional spring constant. Thus, combining beams having width-to-thickness ratios (w:t) that differ and may be both greater than and less than one-to-one (1:1) can be advantageous exploited in designing folded torsion bars


54


.





FIG. 7



a


depicts an alternative configuration for a bifilar torsion bar


54


that leaves ends


112


of L-shaped beams


114


free to deflect independently of the frame


56


and the plate


58


. Freeing the ends


112


of the L-shaped beams


114


, that are arranged symmetrically on both sides of the axis


62


, to independently bend upward or downward greatly reduces the torsional spring constant of the torsion bar


54


while maintaining stiffness in the vertical and lateral directions. Each of the beams


114


may include a bending sensor


116


that responds to uniaxial stress. Since the uniaxial stresses in the beams


114


have opposite signs, the signals produced by the bending sensors


116


may be advantageously combined to cancel noise and increase the signal due to uniaxial stress in the beams


114


. Alternatively, the beams


114


may include torsion sensors


108


such as those described in the '618 patent.





FIG. 7



b


depicts an alternative embodiment for folded torsion bars


54


that includes U-shaped beams


114


arranged symmetrically on both sides of the axis


62


. The torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 7



b


exhibits a lower torsional spring constant than that of the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 7



a


. In the configuration of the beams


114


illustrated in

FIG. 7



b


, the ends


112


of the beams


114


are free to bend upward or downward.




Alternatively, the two L-shaped beams


114


of the torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 7



a


may be augmented by a centrally-located, conventional unfolded beam


114


as illustrated forming the trifilar torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 7



c


. The torsion bar


54


depicted in

FIG. 7



c


provides good vertical stiffness. The L-shaped beams


114


provide a low torsional spring coefficient and compliment the characteristics of the central unfolded beam


114


by providing good lateral stiffness.




For many if not all of the folded, bifilar and trifilar configurations for the torsion bars


54


described above, the relationship between the frame


56


and plate


58


and the torsion bar


54


are equivalent. Therefore, the relationship between the torsion bar


54


and the frame


56


and plate


58


illustrated in

FIGS. 4



a


,


4




b


,


5




b


,


6




a


,


6




b


,


7




a


,


6




b


and


7




c


may usually be reversed.




Stabilizing Dynamic Member Rotation




In comparison with the tethers


86


connecting between the frame


56


and the plate


58


as disclosed in the '09289 PCT patent application that change the torsional spring constant of the torsional scanner


52


as the plate


58


rotates about the axis


62


, as described below it is far more advantageous to attach one or more appendages or tethers to one or both of the torsion bars


54


that support the plate


58


rather than directly to the plate


58


itself. By attaching appendages or tethers to one or both of the torsion bars


54


, the length of the torsion bar


54


can be effectively shortened at pre-established angles as the plate


58


rotates about the axis


62


thereby creating a marked change in the torsional spring constant of the torsional scanner


52


at each such angle. In this way it is possible to provide the torsional scanner


52


with a multi-segmented restoring torque curve that increases the electrostatic stability of the torsional scanner


52


without distorting the mirror surface


76


.




An electrostatically energized torsional scanner


52


that exhibits a highly non-linear torsional spring constant, analogous to that illustrated by the line segments


94




a


and


94




b


in

FIG. 3



a


, may be fabricated as depicted in

FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


. The torsional scanner


52


depicted in those FIGs. includes one or more appendages


122


attached to the torsion bars


54


at points which are located along the torsion bars


54


between the frame


56


and the plate


58


. Each of the appendages


122


includes a free, projecting end


124


that does not contact any other portion of the torsional scanner


52


when the plate


58


is free of any torque about the axis


62


. When the plate


58


rotates sufficiently far about the axis


62


the projecting end


124


of each appendage


122


contacts a stop


126


positioned either on the frame


56


or on the insulating substrate


64


, or contacts the insulating substrate


64


directly. As illustrated in

FIG. 8



b


, stops


126


may be located above or below the plane of the plate


58


.




The appendages


122


may be made of the same silicon material as the torsion bars


54


, and may be formed during fabrication of the torsional scanner


52


at the same time as the torsion bars


54


. Alternatively, the appendages


122


may be formed by materials that are coated onto the torsion bars


54


during fabrication of the torsional scanner


52


such as layers of metals, oxides or nitrides. Depending upon precise details of the appendages


122


and the stops


126


, the torsional scanner


52


may exhibit a torsional spring constant that is symmetric on both sides of the torque axis depicted in

FIG. 8



c


, i.e. that exhibits the same torsional spring constant both for clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


.




Engagement of the projecting end


124


of the appendage


122


with the stops


126


or the insulating substrate


64


impedes further rotation of the torsion bar


54


along a section


128


of the torsion bar


54


extending from the frame


56


to the point at which the appendage


122


attaches to the torsion bar


54


. Impeding further rotation of the section


128


effectively removes the section


128


from the torsional spring supporting the plate


58


, and effectively shortens the torsion bar


54


. Dynamically shortening the torsion bar


54


in this way abruptly changes the slope of the torsional spring constant. Since initial rotation of the plate


58


away from the rest position is unencumbered, including one or more appendages


122


in the torsional scanner


52


increases the electrostatic stability of the torsional scanner


52


. By coupling the appendages


122


to the torsion bars


54


rather than to the plate


58


, the restraint which the appendages


122


impose on rotation of plate


58


does not change the flatness of the mirror surface


76


. The appendages


122


may attach to one or both of the torsion bars


54


and, as illustrated in

FIG. 8



a


, may attach at multiple points along the torsion bars


54


using appendages


122


that have differing lengths.




The graph of

FIG. 8



c


illustrates, with respect to the driving torque curve


92


depicted from

FIG. 3



a


, a multi-segmented restoring torque curve


132


in which the slope of the restoring torque curve


132


changes abruptly for angles at which the projecting end


124


of appendages


122


first engage their respective stops


126


. As is apparent from the graphs in

FIG. 8



c


, for the illustrative restoring torque curve


132


there does not exist an angular rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


with respect to the frame


56


which is electrostatically unstable. The dimensions of and the materials forming the appendages


122


may be chosen such that the appendages


122


flex slightly as the plate


58


continues rotating after their respective projecting ends


124


engage the stops


126


. Such flexing of the appendages


122


yields a restoring torque curve


132


which has curved rather than linear segments with transitions between the different torsional spring constant segments changing more smoothly than illustrated in

FIG. 8



c.






In many pointing or steering applications for torsional scanners


52


such as fiber optic switching, the light beam


74


reflecting off the mirror surface


76


of the plate


58


may remain fixed in the same direction for a very long time, e.g. hours or even days. In such applications, infrequent impacts of the projecting ends


124


on the stops


126


does not adversely affect the life or reliability of the torsional scanner


52


.




For torsional scanners


52


in which the plate


58


must rotate at high speed, the torsional scanners


52


may include a tether


142


attached as illustrated in

FIGS. 9



a


and


9




b


to either one or both of the torsion bars


54


. The tether


142


includes connection rods


144


each of which is coupled by a spring


146


to the frame


56


by flexible rods


148




a


and


148




b


. As illustrated in greater detail in

FIG. 9



b


, the springs


146


use an inverted connection for corrugations


152


so the corrugations


152


compress during rotation of the plate


58


either clockwise or counter-clockwise about the axis


62


. Use of the inverted connection corrugations


152


causes the stiffness of the springs


146


to increase dramatically when fully compressed.




All parts of spring


146


are made as stiff as possible, except for the corrugations


152


and flexible rods


148




a


and


148




b


, which allow the spring


146


to flex as connection rods


144


moves. As the torsion bar


54


rotates, the connection rods


144


move and flexible rods


148




a


and


148




b


are pulled thereby compressing the corrugations


152


until the corrugations


152


contact each other at which point the tether


142


becomes essentially inelastic. When the corrugations


152


contact each other, rotation of a section


128


of the torsion bar


54


is impeded similar to the tethers


142


causing the torsional spring constant to exhibit an abrupt change of value. Thus, the restoring torque curve for the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIGS. 9



a


and


9




b


may be made multi-segmented as depicted in

FIG. 8



c


for the torsional scanner


52


illustrated in

FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


. Moreover, the stiffening of the restoring torque curve obtained with each tether


142


occurs symmetrically for both clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the frame


56


.




The corrugations


152


can be made extremely flexible so the corrugations


152


have little effect on the torsional spring constant of the torsion bars


54


until the corrugations


152


become compressed. The corrugations


152


may include stops


154


as illustrated in

FIG. 9



c


, to limit compression of the corrugations


152


. The corrugations


152


may also be spaced non-uniformly so some of the corrugations


152


in the spring


146


contact each other before contact occurs between other corrugations


152


. Instead of the compression springs


146


, as illustrated in

FIG. 9



a


the tethers


142


may include an extension spring


156


connected to the torsion bar


54


. Using the spring


156


, an increase in torsional spring constant results from the increasing stiffness of corrugations


152


as they extend.




The springs


146


may be oriented at any angle with respect to the torsion axis


62


to save space. The connection rods


144


, the springs


146


or springs


156


, and the flexible rods


148




a


and


148




b


may all be made out of silicon during fabrication of the torsional scanner


52


. Alternatively, they may be made of metal, polysilicon, nitride, oxide etc. applied onto a surface of a silicon wafer during fabrication of the torsional scanner


52


.




If to measure rotation of the plate


58


the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


or


9




a


and


9




b


includes a torsion sensor


108


located on at least one of the torsion bars


54


such as described in the '618 patent, the torsion sensor


108


must be located on one of the torsion bars


54


in a section thereof whose rotation is unrestrained by any of the appendages


122


or tethers


142


. However the output signal from a torsion sensor


108


included in the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


or


9




a


and


9




b


per unit angle of rotation of the plate


58


differs along each segment of the restoring torque curve


132


. The output signal from the torsion sensor


108


varies because the stress in the section of the torsion bar


54


which carries the torsion sensor


108


per unit angle of rotation of the plate


58


is different along each segment of the restoring torque curve


132


.




A non-linear torsional spring constant may also be obtained by using conventional, unfolded torsion bars


54


that are very wide in comparison with their length. For many applications, torsion bars


54


typically have a five-to-one (5:1) to ten-to-one (10:1) width-to-length ratio (w:1). However, if the torsion bars


54


have a much larger width-to-length ratio (w:1), e.g. a ratio that exceeds one-to-two (1:2), then upon rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


edges of the torsion bars


54


extending from the frame


56


to the plate


58


exhibit both twisting and stretching.




Another approach to at least partially alleviating electrostatic instability of the torsional scanner


52


is supplying feedback from a rotation sensor to the circuit that generates the electrostatic drive signals as described below. As disclosed in the '790 patent, in principle feeding back a rotation sensor signal to the circuit that generates the electrostatic drive signals should eliminate electrostatic instability for all angles of rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the torsion bar


54


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

that depicts the straight line


82


restoring torque curve and the curved driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


, the problem of electrostatic instability can be relieved by flattening the driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


. For a particular torsional scanner


52


, flattening the driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


in comparison with those depicted in

FIG. 2

also permits controllably rotating the plate


58


throughout larger angles. The effective driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


may be modified to become much flatter by subtracting from the driving voltages applied to the electrodes


66


a voltage which is proportional to an appropriate power-law, e.g. the second or third power, of the rotation sensed for the plate


58


. Any angle sensor integrated in the torsion bar


54


, such as the rotation sensor described in the '618 patent, or other type of angle sensor based on piezo-resistor bridges or capacitive angle sensors may be used for sensing rotation of the plate


58


.





FIG. 10



a


depicts the torsional scanner


52


of

FIG. 1

together with timing diagrams illustrating typical, conventional electrostatic drive signals applied respectively to the electrodes


66


included in the torsional scanner


52


. As illustrated by the timing diagrams in

FIG. 10



a


, a conventional electrostatic driving circuit preferably applies a driving signal between the plate


58


and one of the electrodes


66


which consists of a bias voltage “V


0


” to which is added a driving voltage “v.” Alternatively, the bias voltage “V


0


” minus the voltage “v” is applied as the driving signal between the plate


58


and the other electrode


66


. Adding and subtracting the voltage “v” respectively to the electrodes


66


unbalances the electrostatic attraction between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


which causes the plate


58


to rotate either clockwise or counter-clockwise about the axis


62


. Quasi-static motion of the plate


58


is obtained by periodically reversing the addition and substraction of the voltage “v” in the driving signals applied between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


.





FIG. 10



b


depicts a block diagram of a circuit adapted to provide driving voltages to the electrodes


66


of

FIG. 1

which enhance electrostatic stability of the torsional scanner


52


by flattening the driving torque curves


84




a


,


84




b


and


84




c


of FIG.


2


. In the block diagram of

FIG. 10



a


, a rotation sensor


162


, preferably the torsion sensor


108


, generates an output signal “a” responsive to angular rotation of the plate


58


with respect to the frame


56


about the axis


62


. An input of a multiplier


164


receives the output signal “a” and squares the signal “a” to produce an output signal “a


2


.” An input of an amplifier


166


receives the squared output signal “a


2


” and amplifies that signal by a constant factor “K.” The amplified output signal from the amplifier


166


“Ka


2


” together with the voltage “v” applied to the plate


58


is then received by inputs respectively of unity gain summing amplifiers


168


− and


168


+. The summing amplifier


168


− subtracts the output signal “Ka


2


” received from the amplifier


166


from the voltage “v” and supplies the difference thus obtained “+v−Ka


2


” as an input signal to a summing amplifier


172




a


. The summing amplifier


168


+ adds the output signal “Ka


2


” received from the amplifier


166


to the negative of the voltage “v” and supplies the result thus obtained “−v+Ka


2


” as an input signal to a summing amplifier


172




b


. The voltage “V


0


” also received by both summing amplifiers


172




a


and


172




b


is added to the signals received respectively from the summing amplifiers


168


− and


168


+ and the summing amplifiers


172




a


and


172




b


supply the results of such addition, i.e. and “V


0


+v−Ka


2


” “V


0


−v+Ka


2


” to the respective electrodes


66


. The timing diagrams of

FIG. 10



c


illustrate typical drive signals as may be applied by the circuit depicted in

FIG. 10



b


between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


that enhance electrostatic stability.




The multiplier


164


may be configured to raise the output signal “a” from the rotation sensor


162


to a power other than 2, i.e. 3, 4, etc. The power “n” applied to the output signal “a” from the rotation sensor


162


to obtain “a


n


” is selected to reduce the control voltage “v” thus appropriately flattening the driving torque curve. The bias voltage V


0


may also be scaled, according to one an appropriately chosen power law, which further increases the flatness of the driving torque curve. For an electrostatically energized plate


58


1.5 mm on a side, with torsion bars


54


that are 150 micron long, 8 microns thick and 12 microns wide, and for an applied voltage V


0


of 310 V and the signal voltage v is 300 volts, the driving torque curve, as illustrated in

FIG. 11

, becomes much flatter using the driving circuit depicted in

FIG. 10. A

driving torque curve


176


illustrates the torque applied to the plate


58


by the circuit illustrated in

FIG. 2

in which the multiplier


164


squares the output signal “a” from the rotation sensor


162


. A driving torque curve


178


in

FIG. 11

illustrates the torque applied to the plate


58


by the circuit illustrated in

FIG. 2

in which bias voltage V


0


has also been subjected to the same angular feedback. The stability region is found to improve from about 2° to 4° for a drive circuit illustrated by the driving torque curve


176


. In this way, the stability and flatness of the driving curve are vastly improved.




Improved Electrostatic Drive




Intuitively, it seems reasonable to expect that for identically shaped plates


58


, one with and one without a box frame, that upon application of voltage to the electrodes


66


the plate


58


having the box frame would exhibit a lesser torque. It seems logical initially that the plate


58


without the box frame would exhibit more torque because most of a hollow central region of the plate


58


surrounded by the box frame contributes little to the total torque since the plate


58


at the central region is relatively far away from the electrodes


66


. However, a theoretical analysis establishes that torque applied to the plate


58


of a torsional oscillator such as the torsional scanner


52


by an electrostatic driving field may be substantially enhanced by sharpening tips of a box frame that face the electrodes


66


. Moreover, for an appropriate geometry of a box frame and corresponding electrodes, the enhanced electrostatic field resulting from sharp tips of the box frame increases the torque obtained electrostatically. Since the box-frame is typically made out of electrically conductive silicon, sharpening the box frame increases attraction between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


by geometrically concentrating the electrostatic field at tips of the box frame. Since the box frame tip and the electrostatic field enhanced by sharpening tips of the box frame are, in many instances, both located about the periphery of the plate


58


far from the torsion bars


54


and the rotation axis


62


which the torsion bars


54


establish, electrostatic attraction between the box frame and the corresponding electrodes


66


produces a maximum amount of torque. Thus, even though the area of electrostatic interaction between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


decreases, the torque applied electrostatically to the plate


58


increases for particular geometrical configurations of the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


. Tips of a suitably designed box frame may be easily sharpened by appropriate anisotropic etching of the silicon plate


58


.




A curve


182


in

FIG. 12



a


, made up of straight line segments


182




a


and


182




b


, illustrates a surface


184


of one-half (½) of a box frame


186


reinforcing rim included in a torsional oscillator such as the plate


58


or a frame, usually about the periphery thereof. The box frame


186


that is illustrated in the partial cross-sectional view of

FIG. 12



a:






1. is spaced 160.0 microns from the electrode


66


which is located along the vertical axis of the graph at 0.0 on the horizontal axis of the graph;




2. is oriented perpendicularly into and out of the plane of

FIG. 12



a


along the periphery of the plate


58


parallel to the axis


62


established by the torsion bars


54


;




3. is approximately 90.0 microns wide at a tip


188


of the box frame


186


nearest to the electrode


66


; and




4. has a width of approximately 600.0 microns at a juncture between the box frame


186


and the remainder of the plate


58


.




In

FIG. 12



a


, a curve


192


, which represents of a surface


194


of a portion of an elliptical cylinder oriented parallel to the box frame


186


, overlays the curve


182


to illustrate graphically how little difference exists between the surface


194


of that particular elliptical cylinder and the surface


184


of the box frame


186


. A dashed line


196


illustrates a (111) crystallographic plane of a silicon wafer after anisotropic etching.




Representing a closed solution obtained analytically using the elliptically-shaped surface


194


depicted in

FIG. 12



a


,

FIG. 12



b


illustrates graphically a component of electrostatic field strength oriented perpendicular to the electrode


66


upon application of an electrical potential of 600 V between the electrode


66


and the box frame


186


as spacing between the box frame


186


and the electrode


66


varies due to rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


established by the torsion bars


54


. In comparison with a flat plate


58


oriented parallel to the electrode


66


, a computation using the elliptically-shaped surface


194


establishes that the presence of the tip


188


of the box frame


186


adjacent to the electrode


66


increases electrostatic field by a factor of almost two (2.0). Therefore, the attractive force between the electrode


66


and the plate


58


that includes the box frame


186


is approximately four (4) times greater than the attractive force between a flat plate


58


and the electrode


66


.




The theoretical analysis of the attractive force between electrodes


66


and plates


58


that includes the box frame


186


indicates that box frames


186


having a width at the tip


188


which is between zero (0.0) and three (3.0) times the average spacing between the electrode


66


and the tip


188


exhibit increased electrostatic attractive force. Because of the increased electrostatic attraction between the sharpened box frames


186


and the electrodes


66


, and because the box frame


186


is located about the periphery of the plate


58


, for a plate


58


having a width of one (1.0) mm perpendicular to the axis


62


, the torque per unit length of the box frame


186


is about fifteen percent (15%) greater than that for the plate


58


without the box frame


186


.




To further increase attractive force between the electrodes


66


and the plate


58


for those applications that require maximum torque but not necessarily maximum Q, the electrodes


66


may be shaped as illustrated in

FIGS. 12



c


and


12




d


to conform with the shape of the box frame


186


. The electrodes


66


shaped to conform with the sharpened box frame


186


increase the electrostatic field produced by electrodes


66


located about the box frame


186


. The conforming shapes respectively illustrated in

FIGS. 12



c


and


12




d


may be formed by plating-up structures onto the insulating substrate


64


, or by anisotropically etching (111) crystallographic planes of silicon material. To create the desired shape for the electrode


66


by anisotropically etching silicon, that portion of the electrodes


66


which conform with sloping side surfaces of the box frame


186


is first etched into a separate piece of silicon. The anisotropically etched piece of silicon is then fixed to the underlying insulating substrate


64


and electrically interconnected with portions of the electrodes


66


formed on the insulating substrate


64


adjacent to the tips


188


. The conforming electrodes


66


can also be silk-screened onto, or can be machined into the insulating substrate


64


. The electrodes


66


may be overcoated with a dielectric material such as polyimide to reduce the likelihood that electrical sparking will occur between the plate


58


and the electrodes


66


.




In general, rotation of the plate


58


causes air to move laterally across the insulating substrate


64


with both compression and rarefaction occurring concurrently on opposite sides of the plate


58


. As is readily apparent, such movement of the air dissipates energy supplied by the plate


58


. The hollow-center box frame


186


significantly reduces such energy loss thereby providing a torsional oscillator, such as the torsional scanner


52


, with higher Q. For those torsional oscillators such as the torsional scanner


52


that require a high Q, as illustrated in

FIG. 13



a


the central portion of the box frame


186


should be hollowed out as much as practicable forming a hollow cavity


198


. The cavity


198


should also possess a substantial opening between the moving plate


58


and both the insulating substrate


64


and the electrodes


66


. When comparing the plate


58


having the box frame


186


illustrated in

FIG. 13



a


with a solid plate


58


illustrated in

FIG. 13



b


both of which are spaced equally from the electrodes


66


, it is apparent the hollow plate


58


depicted in

FIG. 13



a


exhibits less air friction than the solid plate


58


depicted in

FIG. 13



b


, particularly due to reduced squeeze film damping. Losses due to air friction may be further reduced, as illustrated in

FIG. 13



c


, by hollowing a cavity


202


into the insulating substrate


64


that opens toward the cavity


198


formed into the plate


58


.




For applications in which flatness of the plate


58


is not a dominant consideration, a thinner portion of the plate


58


may extend outward away from the torsion bar


54


and axis


62


beyond the box frame


186


as illustrated in

FIG. 13



d


. For the plate


58


depicted there, rather than being located at the periphery of the plate


58


, the smaller box frame


186


is located between the periphery of the plate


58


furthest from the axis


62


and the torsion bars


54


. For the box frame


186


depicted in

FIG. 13



d


, the tips


188


of the box frame


186


rotate less than if the box frame


186


encircles the periphery of the plate


58


. Lesser movement of the plate


58


permits reducing both the spacing between the box frame


186


and the electrodes


66


and the driving voltage applied thereacross. Extension of the plate


58


outward from the torsion bar


54


and the axis


62


may also be employed with the solid plate


58


illustrated in

FIG. 13



b.







FIG. 13



e


illustrates an alternative embodiment configuration of the plate


58


adapted for energizing rotation about the axis


62


electrostatically. In the configuration depicted in

FIG. 13



e


, the electrodes


66


are not disposed adjacent to the periphery of the plate


58


where they are most effective for applying torque to the plate


58


. Rather the torsional scanner


52


includes pairs of auxiliary driving-plates


212


each of which pairs is disposed along conventional, unfolded torsion bars


54


on both opposite sides thereof. Each pair of plates


58


is coupled to the torsion bar


54


located between them at an end of the torsion bar


54


which is immediately adjacent to the plate


58


. Each pair of auxiliary driving-plates


212


has a width perpendicular to the axis


62


which is significantly less than a width of the plate


58


perpendicular to the axis


62


. Since each pair of auxiliary driving-plates


212


is narrower than the plate


58


, spacing between the auxiliary driving-plates


212


and pairs of electrodes


66


disposed adjacent thereto may be significantly smaller than if the electrodes


66


were disposed adjacent to the periphery of the plate


58


. Since each of the auxiliary driving-plates


212


is disposed nearer to its corresponding electrode


66


, a lower voltage may be applied between the auxiliary driving-plates


212


and the electrodes


66


. Because electrostatic driving electrodes


66


for applying torque to the plate


58


are not disposed adjacent to the plate


58


, both a front side and a back side of the plate


58


may function as mirror surfaces


76


for reflecting light beams


74


. If the torsional scanner


52


need reflect only a single light beam


74


, then the electrodes


66


may extend parallel to the axis


62


adjacent to one surface of the plate


58


fully from one pair of auxiliary driving-plates


212


to the other pair auxiliary driving-plates


212


.




Increased Thermal Conductivity Torsion Bars




Heat dissipation from the plate


58


may be increased by using wide and thin torsion bars


54


for supporting the plate


58


within the frame


56


. Use of wide and thin torsion bars


54


improves heat dissipation from the plate


58


because, for an equivalent torsion spring constant, wide and thin torsion bars


54


have greater cross-sectional area and thermal conductivity than narrower and thicker torsion bars


54


. For the unfolded torsion bar


54


, the torsional spring constant increases as the third power of the thickness, and is proportional to the width of the torsion bar


54


. Therefore, decreasing the thickness of the bar by one-half, and increasing the width eight times provides the same torsional spring constant. However, the cross-sectional area of the wider and thinner torsion bar


54


is four (4) times larger, which correspondingly increases the thermal conductivity of the wider and thinner torsion bar


54


.




For many applications, micromachined torsion bars


54


typically have a two-to-one (2:1) to four-to-one (4:1) width-to-thickness ratio (w:t), e.g. 30.0 microns wide and 10.0 microns thick. However, if the torsion bars


54


have a much larger width-to-thickness ratio (w:t), e.g. a width-to-thickness (w:t) ratio that exceeds four-to-one (4:1), then thermal conductivity between the plate


58


and the frame


56


may doubles or triple in comparison with narrower and thicker torsion bars


54


having the same torsional spring constant.




As described in detail in the '790, '553 and '618 patents, Simox, silicon-on-insulator or bonded silicon wafer substrates are a particularly preferred starting material for fabricating reflecting torsional scanners


52


because they permit easily fabricating a very flat, stress-free membrane, possibly only a few microns thick, for the reflective plate


58


. As illustrated in

FIG. 14

, a Simox or bonded wafer


222


includes an electrically insulating layer of silicon dioxide


224


that separates single crystal silicon layers


226


and


228


. The torsion bars


54


and plate


58


of torsional scanners


52


are formed in the thinner device silicon layer


226


while other portions of torsional scanners


52


, such as the box frame


186


, are formed by backside etching in the thicker handle silicon layer


228


. The intermediate silicon dioxide


224


provides a perfect etch stop for backside etching, and yields torsion bars


54


and plates


58


having uniform thickness.




In addition to geometrical techniques that may be used for improving thermal conductivity of torsion bars


54


, plates


58


or frames and their associated torsion bars


54


may be made out of pure isotopic silicon, e.g. 14Si


28


. Isotopically pure 14Si


28


, the predominant silicon isotope, has a thermal conductivity that is fifty percent (50%) greater than standard isotopically impure silicon. To enhance thermal conductivity between the plate


58


and the frame


56


via the torsion bars


54


, the device silicon layer


226


of bonded wafer


222


, which provides the material both for the plate


58


and torsion bars


54


, is made of pure isotopic 14Si


28


silicon. For such bonded wafers, the handle silicon layer


228


may be made from isotopically impure silicon. If a Simox wafer is used for fabricating the torsional scanner


52


, then the entire wafer


222


must made from pure isotopic 14Si


28


silicon. Forming the torsion bars


54


from isotopically pure 14Si


28


silicon increases thermal conductivity between the plate


58


and the frame


56


thereby enhancing heat dissipation of the plate


58


.




Adjusting Dynamic Member's Q




In many applications for micromachined, silicon torsional oscillators, particularly those in which the plate


58


oscillates back and forth at the frequency of the principal torsional vibrational mode, the high Q, e.g. greater than 5000, exhibited by the torsional scanner


52


is highly desirable. However, for other applications, such as those in which the torsional scanner


52


rotates to and remains fixed in one orientation for some interval of time, and subsequently rotates swiftly through a relatively large angle to another orientation where it again remains fixed for some interval of time, high Q can be disadvantageous. For such applications of micromachined silicon torsional oscillators, after the plate


58


rotates from one orientation to another its high Q causes the plate


58


to vibrate back and forth around the new orientation for some interval of time until energy stored in the plate


58


dissipates.




The “butterfly-shaped” frame as illustrated in the '139 patent, or butterfly-shaped plate


58


may be very advantageously adapted for controlling the Q of the moving plate


58


or frame.

FIG. 15



a


illustrates a configuration of the torsional scanner


52


in which a conventional frame


56


encircles a “butterfly-shaped” plate


58


. Elongated slots


232


formed in the plate


58


, which give the plate


58


its “butterfly” shape, extend alongside conventional, elongated torsion bars


54


which support the plate


58


within the frame


56


. A blob of damping material


236


, which may be formed by a tape or some viscous material, spans across each of the slots


232


near the frame


56


to lossyly couple the plate


58


to the torsion bars


54


. Because the end of the torsion bar


54


near the frame


56


is almost motionless compared with movement of the plate


58


, disposing the material


236


near the frame


56


applies substantial stress to the material


236


whenever the plate


58


moves. Application of substantial stress to the lossy material


236


provides strong damping for movements of the plate


58


. However, forces which the damping material


236


couples to the torsion bars


54


are likely to distort the plate


58


. Therefore, it may be advantageous to almost totally encircle a central mirror portion


242


of the plate


58


with a stress relief cut


244


. Almost totally surrounding the central mirror portion


242


with the stress relief cut


244


leaves the central mirror portion


242


supported within the plate


58


by short beams


246


thereby decoupling stress in the surrounding portion of the plate


58


from the central mirror portion


242


and ensuring the flatness of the mirror surface


76


.





FIG. 15



b


depicts an alternative embodiment of the torsional scanner


52


which is also advantageously adapted for controlling the Q of the moving plate


58


or frame. In the embodiment depicted there, slots


232


alongside the torsion bars


54


are formed in the frame


56


rather than in the plate


58


. Again material


236


spans across each of the slots


232


near the essentially motionless end of each torsion bar


54


. Configured in this way, taut damping material


236


couples substantial stress from the torsion bars


54


to the frame


56


whenever the plate


58


moves. Because in the embodiment depicted in

FIG. 15



b


the dampping material


236


couples stress from the torsion bars


54


into the comparatively thick and rigid frame


56


rather than into the relatively thin and flexible plate


58


, the embodiment depicted there may possibly omit the stress relief cut


244


and the beams


246


.




Applying the damping material


236


across the slots


232


and the torsion bars


54


changes the stiffness of the torsion bars


54


somewhat. However, reductions of Q to as low as two (2.0) or even lower are obtainable. For the “butterfly-shaped” frame illustrated in the '139 patent, the damping depicted in

FIGS. 15



a


and


15




b


could be applied to either or both of the torsion bars


54


that support its moving gimbal ring within its fixed thin film frame, or that support the moving, central gimbal plate within its gimbal ring. The Q of torsional scanners


52


that employ folded, bifilar, or trifilar torsion bars


54


, such as those depicted in

FIGS. 4



a


,


4




b


,


5




b


,


6




a


,


6




b


,


7




a


,


6




b


and


7




c


, may also be controlled with damping material


236


.




Ruggedized Torsion Bars That Include A Torsion Sensor




Some applications of torsional oscillators require that the torsion bars


54


be very narrow. Such narrow torsion bars


54


provide limited surface area on the torsion bar


54


for the torsion sensor


108


described in detail in the '618 patent. Alternatively, electrical leads or other structures may compete with the torsion sensor


108


for surface area on the torsion bar


54


.





FIG. 16



a


depicts a narrow torsion bar


54


having a widened section


252


located near the frame


56


which provides space on the torsion bar


54


for the torsion sensor


108


. As explained in greater detail in the '618 patent, the torsion sensor


108


preferably includes electrical current pads


254




a


and


254




b


which connect via leads


256




a


and


256




b


to current electrodes


258




a


and


258




b


. For ease in laying out the torsion sensor


108


, the current electrodes


258




a


and


258




b


are usually oriented perpendicular to the axis


62


established by the torsion bars


54


. With the current electrodes


258




a


and


258




b


oriented in that way, an electrical current applied to the torsion sensor


108


through the pads


254




a


and


254




b


flows through the torsion bar


54


parallel to the axis


62


between the current electrodes


258




a


and


258




b


. An output voltage from the torsion sensor


108


, that appears across output electrodes


262




a


and


262




b


, varies in response to changes in shear stress in the surface of the widened section


252


. The output voltage produced by the torsion sensor


108


is carried by leads


264




a


and


264




b


to output pads


266




a


and


266




b


. The pads


254




a


and


254




b


, leads


256




a


and


256




b


, leads


264




a


and


264




b


and output pads


266




a


and


266




b


are electrically insulated from the torsion bar


54


and the frame


56


.




One advantage of locating the torsion sensor


108


in the widened section


252


is that electrical leads connecting to the torsion sensor


108


pass immediately onto the frame


56


which usually has a comparatively wide surface. Locating the torsion sensor


108


on the comparatively spacious widened section


252


also significantly reduces or eliminates any requirement for fine line lithography. Analogously, any electrical leads extending across the narrow torsion bar


54


to the plate


58


pass easily around the area of the widened section


252


occupied by the torsion sensor


108


.




However, locating the torsion sensor


108


in the widened section


252


reduces its sensitivity to shear stress in the torsion bar


54


due to rotation of the plate


58


about the axis


62


with respect to the frame


56


. Nevertheless, in comparison with other possible configurations for narrow torsion bars


54


which include the torsion sensor


108


, the widened section


252


may be comparatively advantageous. If the torsion bar


54


is narrower than its thickness, i.e. has a width-to-thickness ratio (w:t) less than one-to-one (1:1), then shear stress in the surface of the torsion bar


54


carrying the torsion sensor


108


decreases dramatically. Hence, the torsion sensor


108


located on the widened section


252


, such as that illustrated in

FIG. 16



b


for a bifilar torsion bar


54


, may actually measure a higher shear stress than if the torsion sensor


108


were located on one or both of the narrow beams


114


making up the torsion bar


54


. Furthermore, the lower shear stress in the widened section


252


reduces any likelihood that metallic electrical leads in that area of the torsion bar


54


will exhibit fatigue due to rotation of the plate


58


. The widened section


252


carrying the torsion sensor


108


may be incorporated into any conventional unfolded, folded, bifilar, or trifilar torsion bar


54


such as those depicted in

FIGS. 4



a


,


4




b


,


5




b


,


6




a


,


6




b


,


7




a


,


6




b


and


7




c.






Highly Reflective Micromachined Members




A significant concern in fabricating micro-machined mirror surfaces


76


is obtaining a high reflectivity surface while keeping the mirror surface


76


flat. Concern about flatness of the mirror surface


76


increases if the torsional scanner


52


must operate throughout an extended temperature range. A mirror surface


76


that satisfies these requirements may be formed, without significantly altering stress in the stress-free plate


58


obtained by micro-machining the torsional scanner


52


from the preferred wafer


222


described above, by applying balanced metal coatings on both a front side and a back side of the plate


58


, i.e. sides of the plate


58


that are the same as or oriented parallel to the device silicon layer


226


of the wafer


222


. Generally such metal coatings should be very thin to reduce the possibility of bending the plate


58


.




In this way high-quality reflective mirror surfaces


76


may generally be formed for such applications of the torsional scanner


52


by first coating one the plate


58


with a thin, e.g. 4 A°, layer of an adhesive material. While chromium (Cr) may be used for the adhesion layer, for flat mirrors, particularly on thin plates


58


, preferably titanium (Ti) or zirconium (Zr) forms a lower stress adhesion layer 10.0 to 100.0 A° thick. After the plate


58


has been coated with the adhesion layer, then the plate


58


is coated with a thicker reflective metallic layer such as 500 to 800 A° of gold. The plate


58


may be coated with these materials in various different ways. Even if a light beam


74


is to reflect from only one side of the plate


58


as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, to reduce the possibility of unbalanced stresses on the plate


58


after one side has been coated to establish the mirror surface


76


the other side receives an identical coating deposited under identical conditions. Depositing identical coatings while maintaining the processing conditions and environment constant produces compensating, balancing stresses on surfaces of the plate


58


which leaves the reflective mirror surface


76


flat.




Typically, metallic coatings forming the mirror surface


76


are applied in a vacuum deposition system, for instance by thermal or electron beam evaporation of metals, or sputtering of metals. Alternatively, metallic coatings forming the mirror surface


76


may be plated onto the plate


58


. During conventional evaporation or sputtering of metals onto silicon wafers as depicted conceptually in

FIG. 17



a


, a chuck


272


holds the wafer


222


to be coated with the device silicon layer


226


facing a source


274


that sprays a beam


276


of metal onto the wafer


222


. Because the source


274


may not always emit a uniform beam


276


, to increase yields of acceptable semiconductor products the chuck


272


may rotate the wafer


222


in the plane of the device silicon layer


226


, as indicated by a curved arrow


282


in

FIG. 17



a


attempting to uniformly coat the wafer


222


.




Using the conventional metal evaporation or sputtering process described above to apply balanced metal coatings on both the front side and the back side of plates


58


that have been micro-machined in the wafer


222


requires sequentially depositing two (2) mirror surfaces


76


, one after the other, on opposite sides of the plate


58


. Such a sequential deposition of two (2) mirror surfaces


76


offers a possibility for introducing minor differences between coatings on opposite sides of the plate


58


which could result in unbalanced stress on the plate


58


.





FIG. 17



b


depicts, conceptually, an alternative metal evaporation or sputtering process which reduces the possibility that coatings on opposite sides of the plate


58


will apply unbalanced stress on the plate


58


. In the process illustrated there, rather than the chuck


272


rotating the wafer


222


in the plane of the device silicon layer


226


, the chuck


272


rotates the wafer


222


about an axis


284


that is parallel to the device silicon layer


226


. Rotation about the axis


284


causes plates


58


micro-machined in the wafer


222


to alternate between the front side and the back side thereof during exposure to the beam


276


. In this way, portions of metallic coatings that provide the mirror surface


76


are applied alternately to opposite sides of the plate


58


until the entire mirror surface


76


builds up which improves the stress-balance between coatings on opposite sides of the plate


58


. This process for rotating the wafer


222


about the axis


284


parallel to the device silicon layer


226


may also be used in applying any other type of coating onto the plate


58


particularly when stress in the plate


58


must not change.




As described above, applying the same material simultaneously to both sides of the plate


58


either by vacuum evaporation, sputtering or plating is preferred for obtaining flat, high quality mirror surfaces


76


. If both sides of the plate


58


cannot be coated simultaneously with the same material, then preferably each of the layers are built up stepwise on the plate


58


by a series of partial coatings alternating back and forth between opposite sides of the plate


58


. If it is impractical to build up the layers by partial coatings alternating between sides of the plate


58


, then the thin adhesion layer should be applied first to one side and then the other side of the plate


58


. After forming the adhesion layer, the reflective layer is applied first to one side and then the other side of the plate


58


. Finally, if both layers must be coated onto one side of the plate


58


before coating them onto the other side, the coatings must surely be applied as a single continuous process performed with processing conditions and environment being maintained constant throughout the entire process, e.g. without breaking vacuum.




In addition to providing a reflective plate


58


with a high quality mirror surface


76


, for some applications of the plate


58


may also require depositing a dielectric coating over a metallic one perhaps to increase the reflectivity of the mirror surface


76


, or to adjust polarization of the light beam


74


reflected from the mirror surface


76


. In most instances reflective characteristics a mirror surface are tailored for a particular application by depositing inorganic materials, such as oxides, nitrides, etc., onto the reflective material such as a metallic film. Because a coating of such an inorganic material needs to be approximately 0.1 to 0.2 microns thick, which is much thicker than the reflective metallic coating applied to the plate


58


, the stress which the optical coating may apply to the plate


58


is a significant concern, particularly since the coating must be deposited in perfect stress balance sometimes onto plates


58


that are only a few microns thick.




For applications in which it is necessary to tailor reflective characteristics of the mirror surface


76


, perhaps to increase its reflectivity or to adjust polarization of the light beam


74


reflected from the mirror surface


76


, rather than applying an oxide, nitride, etc. overcoating onto the reflective material, parylene, used as a conformal dielectric coating, is preferably applied onto reflective mirror surfaces


76


. Parylene is an organic material, which exhibits very low yield stress. Typically parylene deposits conformally at room temperature in a vacuum system at a pressure of a few Torr. For tailoring reflective characteristics of the mirror surface


76


, parylene type “C,” which has an index of refraction of 1.64 and a low expansion coefficient, is to be preferred. Parylene is transparent in the visible portion of the light spectrum, and has few absorption bands even in the infrared. As indicated in

FIG. 18

, parylene also has the unique property that, during a single deposition process, it produces a conformal overcoat


292


of equal thickness on opposite sides of metal coated mirror surfaces


76


of torsional scanners


52


. Hence, when parylene overcoats the mirror surface


76


it forms an identical film both on the front side and the back side of the plate


58


as is desired for stress balancing. Because of parylene's properties, that overcoating will exhibit a much lower inherent stress than conventional inorganic coatings. Thus, overcoating 0.1 to 0.3 microns of parylene onto the mirror surfaces


76


of plates


58


permits fabricating optically tailored mirrors with optimized reflectivity without bending the plate


58


.





FIG. 18



a


depicts reflectivity of 0.659 micron wavelength light having respectively “S” and “P” polarizations from the mirror surface


76


for differing thickness of parylene conformal overcoat


292


.

FIG. 18



b


depicts a difference between phases of the “S” and “P” polarized monochromatic light reflected from the mirror surface


76


for differing thicknesses of the parylene conformal overcoat


292


. As is apparent from

FIG. 18



b


, the “S” and “P” polarized monochromatic light reflected from the mirror surface


76


is in phase if the parylene conformal overcoat


292


is approximately 0.85 microns thick, and if it is approximately 1.75 microns thick. As indicated by

FIG. 18



a


, the reflectivity of mirror surface


76


is poor if the parylene conformal overcoat


292


is approximately 0.85 microns thick, while the reflectivity is at a maximum if the parylene conformal overcoat


292


is approximately 1.75 microns thick. Thus,

FIGS. 18



a


and


18




b


demonstrate that with a parylene conformal overcoat


292


of the proper thickness applied to the mirror surface


76


a highly reflective surface may be obtained which reflects both “S” and “P” polarized monochromatic light without any phase difference between the two polarizations.




Swift, Adjustable Optical Switch




The plan and cross-sectional elevational views of

FIG. 19



a


and


19




b


illustrate a torsional scanner


52


adapted for light beam switching applications. The plate


58


, carrying the mirror surface


76


, is supported within the frame


56


for rotation about the axis


62


by the torsion bars


54


. The frame


56


also includes an actuator portion


302


and is supported for rotation with respect to an outer frame


304


by a second pair of outer torsion bars


306


. The torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIGS. 19



a


and


19




b


is similar to a 2D scanner such as those described in the '790 and '553 patents, but the center of the mirror plate


58


is not located on an axis


312


established by the outer torsion bars


306


about which the frame


56


rotates. Rather, the torsional scanner


52


adapted for light beam switching locates the plate


58


entirely to one side of the axis


312


.




The light beam


74


to be switched propagates parallel to the device silicon layer


226


of the wafer


222


in which the plate


58


and torsion bars


54


lie when the actuator portion


302


of the frame


56


is un-energized for rotation about the axis


312


. When the actuator portion


302


becomes energized and the frame


56


rotates about the axis


312


to the position indicated by dashed lines in

FIG. 19



b


, the mirror surface


76


moves into the propagation path of the light beam


74


thereby reflecting the light beam


74


along a different propagation path.




Conceptually, rotation of the frame


56


about the axis


312


could be energized electrostatically by applying a voltage V between the actuator portion


302


and an electrode


66


. The electrode


66


is secured to an electrically insulating plug


308


shaped to fit within a cavity created in the wafer


222


during fabrication of the torsional scanner


52


. The plug


308


orients the electrode


66


at an angle similar to that to which the frame


56


tilts to intercept the light beam


74


thereby maximizing the attractive electrostatic force between the electrode


66


and the actuator portion


302


. However, if the frame


56


is to rotate quickly about the axis


312


, it must exhibit a high resonant frequency for its principal torsional vibrational mode about the axis


312


. To establish a high resonant frequency for the frame


56


, the outer torsion bars


306


must possess a high torsional spring constant. However, outer torsion bars


306


having a high torsional spring constant require applying a strong torque to the actuator portion


302


first to rotate the frame


56


and then to maintain it in the tilted orientation. As a practical matter, the requirement that a strong force be applied to the actuator portion


302


almost precludes using electrostatic attraction to quickly rotate the frame


56


from its rest position to its tilted orientation. Electro-magnetically energized rotation of the frame


56


about the axis


312


can supply the strong force required to overcome the resistance due to the high torsional spring constant of the outer torsion bars


306


. However, the large electrical current required to maintain the frame


56


in its tilted orientation is undesirable for continuous operation.




In a preferred embodiment for the torsional scanner


52


illustrated in

FIGS. 19



a


and


19




b


, rotation is initially energized electro-magnetically with a subsequent attractive electrostatic force between the electrode


66


and the actuator portion


302


being applied merely to hold the frame


56


in the tilted orientation. For example, a small permanent magnet


318


located near the actuator portion


302


together with a coil


322


carried on the actuator portion


302


which receives a large current pulse may be used to impulsively initiate rotation of the frame


56


about the axis


312


out of the plane of the wafer


222


. A several hundred milliampere (“mA”) current pulse may be applied to the coil


322


in accordance with a pre-programmed profile. Alternatively, either of the outer torsion bars


306


may include a torsion sensor


108


to permit servoing the current pulse so rotation of the frame


56


follows a pre-programmed profile. To most quickly rotate the frame


56


to the desired orientation, either the programmed or servoed current pulse may, near the end of the impulse, reverse the direction of current flow to decelerate rotation. Rotation of the frame


56


should be arranged to provide a soft landing for actuator portion


302


against a plastic support plate


324


located beneath the wafer


222


. That is, the actuator portion


302


should approach the desired orientation with a near zero velocity. After the actuator portion


302


of the frame


56


rotates near the electrode


66


, it can be easily held in the desired orientation without dissipating any power using an electrostatic force because the separation between the rotated actuator portion


302


and the electrode


66


is tiny.




Configured as depicted in

FIG. 19



b


, the magnet


318


establishes a magnetic field that is tilted in a direction indicated by an arrow


325


to optimize the magnetic interaction with the magnetic field produced by the coil


322


. The available field determines how much force can be exerted on the actuator portion


302


, and hence the thickness of the frame


56


and the obtainable switching time. A Nd—B—Fe permanent magnet material, or a plastic variant thereof, is preferred for the magnet


318


to obtain optimum performance. The structure for electro-magnetically energizing rotation of the frame


56


is conveniently assembled by inserting the magnet


318


, and also possibly a magnetic keeper


326


, into an elongated hole


332


that pierces the wafer


222


. The plastic support plate


324


beneath the wafer


222


includes a hole


334


that receives a portion of the magnet


318


, and also possibly the magnetic keeper


326


.




To permit trimming the orientation of the plate


58


, the frame


56


includes at least one, and preferably two, flexible beams


338


that project away from the axis


312


slightly beyond a periphery of the actuator portion


302


. As the plate


58


rotates into the orientation illustrated by dashed lines in

FIG. 19



b


, tips of the beams


338


contact the support plate


324


. By adjusting the voltage V applied between the frame


56


and the immediately adjacent electrode


66


, the plate


58


is pulled into the desired orientation by the attractive electrostatic force between them thus bending the beams


338


. Alternatively, trimming the orientation of the frame


56


may also be accomplished by applying a small electric current to the coil


322


. The electromagnetic force resulting from the small electric current may either compliment or oppose a constant electrostatic force obtained by maintaining the voltage V constant. One of the outer torsion bars


306


may include a torsion sensor


108


which provides an output signal for precisely measuring the orientation of the frame


56


.





FIGS. 20



a


and


20




b


illustrate alternative ways of holding the frame


56


in a desired orientation respectively following a forty-five degree (45°) and a ninety degree (90°) angular rotation, or following any arbitrarily chosen angular rotation. In both of these embodiments the wafer


222


includes a stop


342


where the periphery of the actuator portion


302


included in the frame


56


comes to rest. The electrode


66


, positioned at the stop


342


, is attached to the wafer


222


and overcoated with a suitable insulator, e.g. a few microns of polyimide. Overcoating the electrode


66


with an insulator combined with the extended close contact between the periphery of the frame


56


and the electrode


66


permits establishing very strong electrostatic holding force between the electrode


66


and the periphery of the rotated frame


56


. The embodiment of the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIG. 20



b


employs a arcuate-shaped magnet


318


to provide a magnetic field, indicated by arrows


325


, that is oriented substantially parallel to the coil


322


throughout the ninety degree (90°) rotation of the frame


56


from its rest position to contacting the stop


342


.




As described thus far the stop


342


and the electrode


66


located there are comparatively rigid. Further overcoating the electrode


66


with a layer of resilient material permits effecting small angular adjustments in the orientation of the frame


56


by varying the voltage V applied between the frame


56


and the electrode


66


.





FIG. 20



c


illustrates an alternative embodiment of the frame


56


illustrated in

FIGS. 19



a


and


19




b


that includes a mechanism for adjusting the orientation of the frame


56


after application of the electrostatic force fixes the frame


56


in the orientation in which the plate


58


reflects the light beam


74


along a different propagation path. For the adjustment mechanism illustrated in

FIG. 20



c


, the frame


56


includes a U-shaped partial sub-frame


352


which the outer torsion bars


306


couple to the outer frame


304


. A set of trimming torsion bars


354


, that are located immediately adjacent to the outer torsion bars


306


, couple the partial sub-frame


352


to the remainder of the frame


56


which carries the coil


322


. Typically the trimming torsion bars


354


are much stiffer than the pair of outer torsion bars


306


.




The frame


56


includes a groove


356


which separates most of the frame


56


that includes the plate


58


and the coil


322


from the partial sub-frame


352


. Thus, the portion of the frame


56


that includes the plate


58


and the coil


322


can rotate about an axis


358


established by the trimming torsion bars


354


independently of the partial sub-frame


352


when the partial sub-frame


352


is clamped to the stop


342


. Since the stiff trimming torsion bars


354


permit the frame


56


except for the partial sub-frame


352


to rotate about the axis


358


, a small electric current applied to the coil


322


trims the orientation of the plate


58


with respect to the light beam


74


. Thus, in the embodiment of the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIG. 20



c


, electric currents applied sequentially to the coil


322


first provide an impulse for rotating the frame


56


from its rest position to its active position, and then trim the orientation of the plate


58


while the plate


58


is in its active position.




The trimming torsion bars


354


may include a torsion sensor


108


so trimming the orientation of the frame


56


may be tracked or servoed. Electro-magnetic trimming as described above may be employed to rotate the frame


56


both clockwise and counter-clockwise about the axis


358


. If the torsional scanner


52


requires trimming in only one direction, then trimming could be effected by applying an electrostatic force between that area of the actuator portion


302


which carries the coil


322


and an immediately adjacent electrode which is separate from the electrode


66


depicted in

FIGS. 19



b


,


20




a


and


20




b.






Micromachined Optical Processing Elements




As described in the '324 patent, a polarized light detector may be provided by a set of wires forming a wire grid polarizer appropriately oriented over a photo-detector. Wire grid polarizers suitable for this application are described in “Handbook of Optics”, Mc Graw Hill, copyright 1978, pp. 10-72-10-77. Wire grid polarizers block light having its electric field oriented parallel to the length of wires making up the grid, while passing light having its electric field oriented perpendicular to the wires. As disclosed in the '324 patent by disposing the wire grid in a suitable configuration with respect to a silicon photo-detector, the photo-detector becomes polarization sensitive. As described in the “Handbook of Optics,” the spacing of wires making up the wire grid must be designed for the wavelength of the light incident on the polarized-light photo-detector.





FIG. 21

depicts the plate


58


of the conventional torsional scanner


52


carrying a wire grid polarizer


362


. The wire grid polarizer


362


is disposed over a photo-diode, not separately illustrated in

FIGS. 21

,


21




a


or


22




b


, that is formed in the plate


58


. The wire grid polarizer


362


, depicted in greater detail in

FIG. 22



a


, includes a number of parallel wires


364


. Each of the wires


364


is spaced apart from the immediately adjacent wires


364


by a distance which is no greater than one-half (½) the wavelength of light impinging on the plate


58


. If required for a particular application, stress in the area of the plate


58


occupied by the wire grid polarizer


362


may be decoupled from the remainder of the plate


58


by encircling the wire grid polarizer


362


with a stress relief cut


244


and supporting it with beams


246


, similar to those depicted in

FIG. 15



a


for the central mirror portion


242


located in the plate


58


.




As disclosed in the '790 patent, the torsional scanner


52


may contain a photo-detector, preferably located along the periphery of the plate


58


to monitor reflected light. As illustrated in FIG.


23




a


, photo-detectors


372


, e.g. photo-diode, may also be incorporated into the frame


56


. Signals from the photo-detectors


372


located in the frame


56


, suitably processed, can be used for tracking or other purposes. The photo-detectors


372


may be used to sense light scattered from edges of an object being illuminated by a scanning beam reflected off a mirror surface


76


on the plate


58


. Similar to the torsional scanner


52


depicted in

FIGS. 21

,


22




a


and


22




b


, a wire grid polarizer


362


may be is disposed over the photo-detectors


372


so they become polarization sensitive.




The plate


58


may carry other optical devices instead and/or in addition to a photo-detector. Thus, the plate


58


may carry a diffraction grating, a beam splitter, pinhole, etc., or, as depicted in

FIGS. 24



a


and


24




b


, a transmissive or reflective Fresnel lens


376


. As illustrated in

FIG. 24



b


, the Fresnel lens


376


, made up of concentric ridges


378


, is formed into the plate


58


using reactive ion etching (“RIE”). The Fresnel lens


376


as illustrated transmits light at wavelengths for which silicon is transparent, e.g. at wavelengths used for optical telecommunications. Overcoating the ridges


378


with a reflective layer establishes a reflective Fresnel lens


376


on the plate


58


. As described above, applying a low stress mirror surface


76


to both sides of the plate


58


preserves the shape of the Fresnel lens


376


as initially formed in the plate


58


.




Industrial Applicability




Fabricating the structures described above begins with a wafer


222


of bulk silicon, or a wafer of bulk silicon that includes a silicon-on-insulator (“SOI”) layer. Either of these two types of wafers are then micromachined employing well known techniques which utilize in combination photo-lithography, various electrochemical or plasma etching processes, and suitable plating, depositing, growing and, as appropriate, micromachining processes that establishes on the wafer suitably patterned layers of metals, nitrides, oxides, ceramics, polysilicon, amorphous silicon, polymeric, or other desired material.




Although the present invention has been described in terms of the presently preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that such disclosure is purely illustrative and is not to be interpreted as limiting. Consequently, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and/or alternative applications of the invention will, no doubt, be suggested to those skilled in the art after having read the preceding disclosure. Accordingly, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted as encompassing all alterations, modifications, or alternative applications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member, at least one of the torsional flexure hinges being formed by coupling together first ends of at least three (3) interconnected basic hinge-segments, each basic hinge-segment having a longitudinal axis, the first end of each basic hinge-segment being located between ends of the torsional flexure hinge; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges and that is not oriented perpendicular to any of the hinge-segment longitudinal axes; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; whereby the micromachined structure is more compact than if the dynamic member were supported from the reference member by a conventional unfolded torsion bar, and the torsional flexure hinge is stiffer either horizontally or vertically, or both, than a conventional unfolded torsion bar having the same torsional spring constant as the torsional flexure hinge.
  • 2. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein the longitudinal axis of basic hinge-segments are aligned parallel with the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges whereby upon observing the torsional flexure hinge formed thereby in plan view the torsional flexure hinge appear T-shaped.
  • 3. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein a second end of one of the basic hinge-segments couples to the reference member, and second ends of two of the basic hinge-segments couple to the dynamic member.
  • 4. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein a second end of one of the basic hinge-segments couples to the dynamic member, and second ends of two of the basic hinge-segments couple to the reference member.
  • 5. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein at least one of the basic hinge-segments is formed by a conventional unfolded torsion bar that has a torsion sensor included therein.
  • 6. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein the torsional flexure hinges formed by coupling together basic hinge-segments further includes at least two supplemental hinge-segments each of which includes a first end which couples to a second end of one of the basic hinge-segments, each supplemental hinge-segment having a longitudinal axis that is not oriented perpendicular to the axis about which the dynamic member rotates.
  • 7. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein the longitudinal axis of basic hinge-segments and of the supplemental hinge-segments are aligned parallel with the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges whereby upon observing the torsional flexure hinge formed thereby in plan view each pair of coupled basic hinge-segments and supplemental hinge-segments respectively appears U-shaped.
  • 8. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein a second end of the basic hinge-segment that is not coupled to either of the supplemental hinge-segments couples to the reference member, and second ends of the supplemental hinge-segments couple to the dynamic member.
  • 9. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein a second end of the basic hinge-segment that is not coupled to either of the supplemental hinge-segments couples to the dynamic member, and second ends of the supplemental hinge-segments couple to the reference member.
  • 10. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein at least one of the supplemental hinge-segments is a bifilar beam.
  • 11. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein the basic hinge-segments and the supplemental hinge-segments have differing width-to-thickness (w:t) ratios.
  • 12. The micromachined structure of claim 6 wherein the basic hinge-segments and the supplemental hinge-segments have differing lengths.
  • 13. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein at least one of the basic hinge-segments is a bifilar beam.
  • 14. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein the basic hinge-segments have differing width-to-thickness (w:t) ratios.
  • 15. The micromachined structure of claim 1 wherein the basic hinge-segments have differing lengths.
  • 16. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member, at least one of the torsional flexure hinges being formed by a bifilar beam; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges, the axis being located between the bifilar beam; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate.
  • 17. The micromachined structure of claim 16 wherein each of the beams forming the bifilar beam upon being observed in plan view is L-shaped.
  • 18. The micromachined structure of claim 16 wherein each of the beams forming the bifilar beam upon being observed in plain view is U-shaped.
  • 19. The micromachined structure of claim 16 further comprising a conventional unfolded torsion bar that is disposed between the two (2) beams included in the bifilar beam of the torsional flexure hinge, and that extends between the reference member and the dynamic member.
  • 20. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; drive means for imparting rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; and at least one appendage having a first end that attaches to one of the torsional flexure hinges at a point along the torsional flexure hinge that is located between the reference member and the dynamic member, the appendage projecting outward from the torsional flexure hinge and being shaped so that upon sufficient rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member a projecting end of the appendage contacts a stop having a fixed relationship with the reference member thereby stiffening a torsional spring constant of the torsional flexure hinge.
  • 21. The micromachined structure of claim 20 wherein while the second end of the appendage remains in contact with the stop the appendage flexes as the dynamic member continues rotating about the axis with respect to the reference member to gradually increase the torsional spring constant.
  • 22. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; drive means for imparting rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; and at least one tether that is coupled at a first end to the reference member and at a second end to one of the torsional flexure hinges at a point along the torsional flexure hinge that is located between the reference member and the dynamic member whereby upon sufficient rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member the tether increases a torsional spring constant of the torsional flexure hinge.
  • 23. The micromachined structure of claim 22 wherein the tether includes a spring.
  • 24. The micromachined structure of claim 23 wherein corrugations included in the spring compress as rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member increases.
  • 25. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; a rotation sensor that is adapted for producing a signal responsive to angular rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member; at least one electrode disposed adjacent to the dynamic member; and drive means for applying an electrostatic drive signal between the dynamic member and electrode that imparts rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges, the drive means receiving a signal from the rotation sensor and altering the drive signal in response thereto to improve electrostatic stability of the micromachined structure.
  • 26. The micromachined structure of claim 25 wherein a component, added to the drive signal, is proportional to the received signal raised to a power.
  • 27. The micromachined structure of claim 26 wherein the power is two (2).
  • 28. The micromachined structure of claim 25 wherein the rotation sensor is a torsion sensor located in one of the torsional flexure hinges.
  • 29. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the dynamic member including a reinforcing rim having a tip that is sharpened; at least one electrode disposed adjacent to the tip of the reinforcing rim; and drive means for applying an electrostatic drive signal between the dynamic member and electrode that imparts rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges, an electrostatic field between the reinforcing rim and the electrode produced by the drive signal being enhanced by the sharpening of the reinforcing rim.
  • 30. The micromachined structure of claim 29 wherein the tip is sharpened by anisotropic etching along (111) crystallographic planes of the silicon substrate.
  • 31. The micromachined structure of claim 29 wherein the tip has a width that is no greater than three (3.0) times the spacing between the dynamic member and the electrode.
  • 32. The micromachined structure of claim 29 wherein:the reinforcing rim encircles a hollow first cavity formed into the dynamic member that opens toward the electrode; and the electrode is supported upon a substrate having a hollow second cavity formed therein that opens toward the first cavity formed into the dynamic member.
  • 33. The micromachined structure of claim 32 wherein the substrate is fabricated using a silicon substrate and the second cavity is formed thereinto by anisotropic etching along (111) crystallographic planes of the silicon substrate.
  • 34. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the dynamic member including reinforcing rim; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the reinforcing rim encircling a hollow first cavity formed into the dynamic member and a substrate upon which the reference member rests having a hollow second cavity formed therein that opens toward the first cavity formed into the dynamic member and that is disposed adjacent thereto.
  • 35. The micromachined structure of claim 34 wherein the substrate is fabricated using a silicon substrate and the second cavity is formed thereinto by anisotropic etching along (111) crystallographic planes of the silicon substrate.
  • 36. The micromachined structure of claim 34 wherein a drive means energizes rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member electrostatically by applying a drive signal between the dynamic member and an electrode attached to the substrate.
  • 37. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; at least one pair of auxiliary driving-plates disposed along opposite sides of one of the pair of torsional flexure hinges between the dynamic member and the reference member, the auxiliary driving-plates being coupled to the torsional flexure hinge adjacent to the dynamic member, the pair of auxiliary driving-plates having a width perpendicular to the axis which is less than a width of the dynamic member perpendicular to the axis, the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges, the dynamic member and the auxiliary driving-plate monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; at least one electrode that is disposed adjacent to one of the auxiliary driving-plates; and drive means for imparting rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges electrostatically by applying a drive signal between the auxiliary driving-plate and the electrode.
  • 38. The micromachined structure of claim 37 wherein the auxiliary driving-plate adjacent to the electrode includes a reinforcing section having a tip that is sharpened by anisotropic etching along (111) crystallographic planes of the silicon substrate.
  • 39. The micromachined structure of claim 38 wherein the tip has a width that is no greater than three (3.0) times the spacing between the dynamic member and the electrode.
  • 40. The micromachined structure of claim 38 wherein the electrode does not occlude the dynamic member whereby light may reflect from reflective mirror surfaces located on either or both sides of the dynamic member.
  • 41. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member which have a width-to-thickness (w:t) ratio that exceeds four-to-one (4:1) whereby the torsional flexure hinges exhibit increase thermal conductivity in comparison with narrower and thinner torsional flexure hinges having an equivalent torsional spring constant; and a dynamic member coupled by the torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate.
  • 42. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsion bars projecting from the reference member, at least a portion of one of the torsion bars having a width-to-length (w:l ) ratio that exceeds one-to-two (1:2) whereby the torsion bars exhibit a non-linear torsional spring constant; and a dynamic member coupled by the torsion bars to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the torsion bars and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate.
  • 43. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using an isotopically pure, stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate.
  • 44. The micromachined structure of claim 43 wherein the dynamic member is also fabricated using isotopically pure silicon.
  • 45. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; a micromachined member selected from a group consisting of the reference member and the dynamic member having at least one slot formed therein that is disposed alongside one of the torsional flexure hinges; and damping material disposed across the slot and contacting the adjacent torsional flexure hinge near the reference member.
  • 46. The micromachined structure of claim 45 wherein the dynamic member includes a stress relief cut that almost completely encircles a decoupled portion of the dynamic member thereby establishing beams for supporting that decoupled portion from a surrounding portion of the dynamic member whereby stress is decoupled between the decoupled portion and the surrounding portion.
  • 47. The micromachined structure of claim 46 wherein the decoupled portion of the dynamic member has at least one reflective mirror surface coated thereon.
  • 48. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the dynamic member includes a stress relief cut that almost completely encircles a decoupled portion of the dynamic member thereby establishing beams for supporting that decoupled portion from a surrounding portion of the dynamic member whereby stress is decoupled between the decoupled portion and the surrounding portion.
  • 49. The micromachined structure of claim 48 wherein the decoupled portion of the dynamic member has at least one reflective mirror surface coated thereon.
  • 50. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member and at least one of the torsional flexure hinges includes a widened section; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; and a torsion sensor located in the widened section that is adapted for producing a signal responsive to angular rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member.
  • 51. The micromachined structure of claim 50 wherein the torsional flexure hinge that having the widened section is formed by coupling together multiple basic hinge-segments one of which includes the widened section.
  • 52. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the reference member and the dynamic member having front and back sides, and both the front and back sides of the dynamic member having a stress balanced reflective mirror coating applied thereto.
  • 53. The micromachined structure of claim 52 wherein during application of the reflective mirror coating to the dynamic member both sides are sequentially coated stepwise to produce balanced stresses.
  • 54. The micromachined structure of claim 53 wherein the dynamic member rotates intermittently during application of the reflective mirror coating.
  • 55. The micromachined structure of claim 53 wherein the dynamic member rotates continuously during application of the reflective mirror coating.
  • 56. The micromachined structure of claim 52 wherein the reflective mirror coating is vacuum deposited onto the dynamic member.
  • 57. The micromachined structure of claim 56 wherein throughout deposition of the reflective mirror coating deposition conditions and environment are maintained constant.
  • 58. The micromachined structure of claim 52 wherein the reflective mirror coating is plated from a liquid solution onto the dynamic member.
  • 59. The micromachined structure of claim 52 wherein a thin adhesion layer is first applied to both the front and back sides of the dynamic member followed by a thicker reflection layer which provides the reflective mirror coating.
  • 60. The micromachined structure of claim 59 wherein a low stress material form s the thin adhesion layer.
  • 61. The micromachined structure of claim 60 wherein the low stress material is selected from a group consisting of titanium and zirconium.
  • 62. The micromachined structure of claim 52 wherein the reflective mirror coatings applied to both the front and back side of the dynamic member are overcoated with parylene.
  • 63. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; and drive means for imparting rotary motion to the dynamic member about the axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges, the drive means initially energizing rotation of the dynamic member about the axis electro-magnetically with a current pulse to impulsively start rotation of the dynamic member to a desired orientation, the stopped dynamic member being held in the desired orientation with an electrostatic clamping force.
  • 64. The micromachined structure of claim 63 wherein the current pulse for impulsively initiating rotation of the dynamic member follows a pre-established profile that causes the dynamic member to approach the desired orientation at a near-zero velocity.
  • 65. The micromachined structure of claim 63 wherein:the micromachined structure further comprises a torsion sensor that is adapted for producing a signal responsive to angular rotation of the dynamic member about the axis with respect to the reference member; and the drive means receives the signal produced by the torsion sensor and uses the signal for servoing the impulsive rotation of the dynamic member to a pre-established profile during application of the current pulse that causes the dynamic member to approach the desired orientation at a near-zero velocity.
  • 66. The micromachined structure of claim 63 wherein the micromachined structure further comprises a stop which the dynamic member contacts while the dynamic member is being held in the desired orientation by the electrostatic clamping force.
  • 67. The micromachined structure of claim 66 wherein the stop is overcoated with a resilient insulating material which the dynamic member contacts while the dynamic member is being held in the desired orientation by the electrostatic clamping force.
  • 68. The micromachined structure of claim 63 further comprising a fine adjusting means which tailors rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation while the dynamic member is being held by the electrostatic clamping force.
  • 69. The micromachined structure of claim 68 wherein the fine adjusting means includes at least one flexible beam that projects away from the axis established by the torsional flexure hinges beyond a periphery of the dynamic member and that contacts a support while the dynamic member is being held by the electrostatic clamping force, and wherein a force applied to the dynamic member bends the flexible beam.
  • 70. The micromachined structure of claim 69 wherein an electrostatic force is applied to the dynamic member in tailoring rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation.
  • 71. The micromachined structure of claim 69 wherein an electromagnetic force is applied to the dynamic member in tailoring rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation.
  • 72. The micromachined structure of claim 68 wherein the fine adjusting means includes in the dynamic member:a sub-frame with the torsional flexure hinges coupling between the sub-frame and the reference member; and a pair of fine adjusting torsional flexure hinges also included in the dynamic member for coupling between a remaining portion of the dynamic member and the sub-frame thereby supporting the remaining portion of the dynamic member for rotation with respect to the sub-frame about a fine adjustment axis established by the fine adjusting torsional flexure hinges; and wherein a force applied to the remaining portion of the dynamic member rotates the remaining portion about the fine adjustment axis in tailoring rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation.
  • 73. The micromachined structure of claim 72 wherein an electrostatic force is applied to the remaining portion of the dynamic member in tailoring rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation.
  • 74. The micromachined structure of claim 72 wherein an electromagnetic force is applied to the remaining portion of the dynamic member in tailoring rotation of the dynamic member to the desired orientation.
  • 75. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the dynamic member also having a photo-detector formed therein and a wire grid polarizer disposed thereon adjacent to the photo-detector, whereby illumination incident on the photo-detector must traverse the wire grid polarizer before impinging upon the photo-detector.
  • 76. The micromachined structure of claim 75 wherein the wire grid polarizer is disposed on a decoupled portion of the dynamic member that is almost completely encircled by a stress relief cut thereby establishing beams for supporting that decoupled portion from a surrounding portion of the dynamic member whereby stress is decoupled between the decoupled portion and the surrounding portion.
  • 77. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member having a photo-detector formed therein adapted for detecting light scattered from an object being scanned optically; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate.
  • 78. The micromachined structure of claim 77 further comprising a wire grid polarizer disposed on the reference member adjacent to the photo-detector, whereby illumination incident on the photo-detector must traverse the wire grid polarizer before impinging upon the photo-detector.
  • 79. An integrated, micromachined structure comprising:a reference member; a pair of diametrically opposed torsional flexure hinges projecting from the reference member; and a dynamic member coupled by the pair of torsional flexure hinges to the reference member to be thereby supported from the reference member for rotation about an axis established by the pair of torsional flexure hinges; the reference member, the pair of torsional flexure hinges and the dynamic member monolithically fabricated using a stress-free semiconductor layer of a silicon substrate; the dynamic member also including a Fresnel lens.
  • 80. The micromachined structure of claim 79 having a reflective mirror coating applied over the Fresnel lens.
  • 81. The micromachined structure of claim 79 wherein the reflective mirror coating is applied to both front and back sides of the dynamic member whereby stresses become balanced.
  • 82. The integrated micromachined structure of claim 1, 16, 20, 22, 25, 29, 34, 37, 41, 42, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52, 63, 75, 77, or 79 wherein the silicon substrate is a silicon-on-insulator substrate.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/098,881 entitled “Improved Light Beamdeflectors” filed on Sep. 2, 1998, and of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/144,953 entitled “Arrangements For Large Fiber Optic N×N Fiber Switch” filed on Jul. 21, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (31)
Number Name Date Kind
4317611 Petersen Mar 1982 A
4468282 Neukermans Aug 1984 A
4598585 Boxenhorn Jul 1986 A
4670092 Motamedi Jun 1987 A
4699006 Boxenhorn Oct 1987 A
4732440 Gadhok Mar 1988 A
4869107 Murakami Sep 1989 A
4942766 Greenwood et al. Jul 1990 A
5016072 Greiff May 1991 A
5111693 Greiff May 1992 A
5202785 Nelson Apr 1993 A
5203208 Bernstein Apr 1993 A
5220835 Stephan Jun 1993 A
5251485 Kondo Oct 1993 A
5331852 Greiff et al. Jul 1994 A
5416324 Chun May 1995 A
5488862 Neukermans et al. Feb 1996 A
5508841 Lin et al. Apr 1996 A
5579148 Nishikawa et al. Nov 1996 A
5629790 Neukermans et al. May 1997 A
5635639 Greiff et al. Jun 1997 A
5648618 Neukermans et al. Jul 1997 A
5650568 Greiff et al. Jul 1997 A
5673139 Johnson Sep 1997 A
5760305 Greiff Jun 1998 A
5841553 Neukermans Nov 1998 A
5861549 Neukermans et al. Jan 1999 A
5895866 Neukermans et al. Apr 1999 A
5905201 Petri May 1999 A
6000280 Miller et al. Dec 1999 A
6044705 Neukermans et al. Apr 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
9809286 Mar 1998 WO
9809287 Mar 1998 WO
9809288 Mar 1998 WO
9809289 Mar 1998 WO
9809392 Mar 1998 WO
9809279 May 1998 WO
9809280 May 1998 WO
9809284 May 1998 WO
9809285 May 1998 WO
9850813 Nov 1998 WO
9852193 Nov 1998 WO
9915925 Apr 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Boxenhorn, B., et al., “Monolithic Silicon Accelerometer,” Sensors and Actuators, A21-A23, (1990) pp. 273-277.
Breng, U., et al., “Electrostatic Micromechanic Actuators,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2(1992) pp. 256-261.
Buser, R. A., et al., “Very High Q-factor Resonators in Monocrystalline Silicon,” Sensors and Actuators, A12-A23 (1990) pp. 323-327.
Dien, B., et al., “SOI (SIMOX) as a Substrate For Surface Micromachining of Single Crystalline Silicon Sensors and Actuators,” The 7th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, (1993) pp. 233-236.
Jaecklin, V.P., et al., “Mechanical and Optical Properties of Surface Micromachined Torsional Mirrors in Silicon, Polysilicon and Aluminum,” The 7th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, (1993) pp. 948-961.
Kleiman, R. N., et al., “Single-crystal Silicon High-Q Torsional Oscillators,” Rev. Sci. Instum. 56(11), Nov. 1985, pp. 2088-2091.
Pfann, W. G., et al., “Semiconducting Stress Transducers Utilizing the Transverse and Shear Piezoresistance Effects,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 32, No. 10, (1961) pp. 2008-2016.
Wagner, B., et al., “Electromagntic Microactuators with Multiple Degrees of Freedom,” 1991 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors adn Actuators, Digest of Technical Papers. (IEEE Cat No. 91CH2817-5) pp. 614-617.
Peterson, K., “Silicon Torsional Mirror,” Proceedings of the IEEE vol. 70, No. 5 (1982), pp. 61-62.
“Handbook of Optics”, McGraw Hill, copyright 1978, pp. 10-72-10-77.
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60/098881 Sep 1998 US
60/144953 Jul 1999 US