This patent application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/057922, filed Sep. 27, 2014, entitled MULTI-CHIP SELF ADJUSTING COOLING SOLUTION.
Field
Multi-chip product cooling.
Description of Related Art
Many integrated circuit products incorporate multi-chip products. An example of a multi-chip product is a package including a microprocessor and memory and companion devices or components (e.g., chips). Packaging can consist of a single integrated heat spreader (IHS) over all the components or individual IHS for each component. Each packaging option has advantages and disadvantages but still each component requires adequate cooling.
The different package options significantly impact the overall junction to ambient thermal resistance. A bond line thickness (BLT) of each of a thermal interface material between the die and IHS (TIM1) and thermal interface material between the IHS and heatsink (TIM2) are two of the most significant thermal resistance factors along with die/IHS size, power density, and total power.
A single IHS design provides one relatively flat surface to interface with a cooling solution such as a passive heat exchanger (e.g., a heatsink) but a single IHS package option can have significant implications on the TIM1 BLT and thus the package thermal resistance (die to IHS). The tolerance between each component must be accounted for either at the package level internal to the IHS as in the single IHS option or at the cooling solution level with the individual IHS option. The tolerance results in a wide range of thickness for the TIM1 BLT of certain chips in a multi-chip product employing the single IHS option. As companion components decrease in size and increase in power density, the thermal resistance from the TIM1 BLT can significantly impact the package performance.
The individual IHS package option minimizes the TIM1 BLT on each component and thus also a package thermal resistance. One drawback is that there are now multiple non-coplanar surfaces that must interface to the cooling solution. The cooling solution (passive heat exchanger) is typically justified to the CPU IHS thus minimizing its TIM2 BLT and corresponding thermal resistance. But the cooling must now account for the variation and non-planarity of each individual component IHS often resulting in a large TIM2 BLT range on each component.
A cooling solution and method of implementing a cooling solution to improve a cooling capability and performance of each component of a multi-chip product package (or multiple packages) on a motherboard that require cooling. The cooling solution adjusts to varying height components or packaging and thus obtains and is operable to maintain a minimum thermal interface resistance for each component. In this manner, the cooling solution can utilize existing thermal interface materials, minimize bond line thickness and its implementation does not thermally sacrifice one component for the sake of another.
In one embodiment, overlying each secondary device is an IHS with a TIM1 therebetween.
The first portion of the heat exchanger (heatsink) including heatsink base 170 and fins 180 also includes a number of openings over areas corresponding to the secondary devices of multi-chip package 100, notably memory dies 130A, 130B, 140A, 140B, 150A and 150B and companion dies 160A and 160B. Disposed within such openings are second heat exchanger (heatsink) portions each including a base and fin structure.
Second heatsink bases 175A-D generate independent loading of each of the secondary devices (memory chips 130A/B, 140A/B and 150A/B and companion chips 160A/B) through deflection (e.g., compression) of the spring associated with the individual heatsink portions (e.g., a wave or coil spring) as the second heatsink base makes contact with a device or its IHS. In one embodiment, springs 197A-D are selected such that a desired deflection provides a predetermined total force to maintain a mechanical load of the heatsink portions on the individual secondary devices and on the package.
As in the prior embodiment described with reference to
In the above embodiment, the secondary devices (secondary dies or chips) are laterally aligned in a y-direction so that the second passive heat exchangers can similarly laterally align and a single retention spring (retention spring 298) may be used to apply a selected downward force on such second passive exchange structures to maintain a predetermined mechanical load on the second passive heat exchange structures. In another embodiment, such secondary devices may not be laterally aligned such that the openings in the first passive exchange device are not aligned and corresponding second passive heat exchange structures are not laterally aligned. In such an embodiment, multiple retention springs would be utilized.
Example 1 is an apparatus including a primary device and at least one secondary device coupled in a planar array to a substrate; a first passive heat exchanger disposed on the primary device and having an opening over an area corresponding to the at least one secondary device; a second passive heat exchanger disposed on the at least one secondary device; at least one first spring operable to apply a force to the first heat exchanger in a direction of the primary device; and at least one second spring operable to apply a force to the second heat exchanger in the direction of the secondary device.
In Example 2, each of the first heat exchanger and the at least one second heat exchanger in the apparatus of Example 1 includes a heatsink base and a fin structure.
In Example 3, the second spring in the apparatus of Example 2 is disposed between the first sink base and the at least one second heatsink base.
In Example 4, the thickness dimension of the primary device on the substrate in the apparatus of Example 3 is different than a thickness dimension of the at least one secondary device and the second spring is operable to be compressed a distance equivalent to a difference between a thickness difference of the first heatsink base and the at least one second heatsink base.
In Example 5, the first heatsink base comprises a first thickness in an area corresponding to the first device and in an area adjacent the opening in the apparatus of Example 2 includes a second thickness that is less than the first thickness.
In Example 6, the at least one second spring in the apparatus of Example 2 is disposed across a dimension of the fin structure of the at least one second heat exchanger.
In Example 7, the thickness dimension of the primary device on the substrate in the apparatus of Example 6 is different than a thickness dimension of the at least one secondary device and the second spring is operable to displace the second heatsink toward the at least one secondary device.
In Example 8, the thickness dimension of the primary device on the substrate in the apparatus of Example 7 is greater than a height dimension of the at least one secondary device.
In Example 9, the heatsink base of the first heat exchanger in the apparatus of Example 2 has a thickness selected to justify the heatsink base with the primary device.
Example 10 is an apparatus including a passive heat exchanger having dimensions operable for disposition on a multi-chip package, the passive heat exchanger including a first portion having a first area with an opening therein; a second portion having dimension operable for disposal in the opening; and a spring operable to apply a force to the second portion.
In Example 11, each of the first portion and the second portion of the heat exchanger in the apparatus of Example 10 includes a heatsink base and a fin structure.
In Example 12, the spring in the apparatus of Example 11 is disposed between the first sink base and the at least one second heatsink base.
In Example 13, the thickness dimension of the first heatsink base in the apparatus of Example 12 is different than a thickness dimension of the at least one second heatsink base.
In Example 14, the thickness dimension of the at least one second heatsink base in the apparatus of Example 13 is less than the thickness dimension of the first heatsink base.
In Example 15, the at least one spring in the apparatus of Example 11 is disposed across a dimension of the fin structure of the at least one second portion.
In Example 16, the heatsink base of the first portion in the apparatus of Example 11 has a thickness operable to justify the heatsink base with a device in a multi-chip package including the greatest heat generation.
Example 17 is a method including placing a passive heat exchanger on a multi-chip package, the passive heat exchanger including a first portion having a first area disposed on a primary device, the first portion having at least one opening over an area corresponding to at least one secondary device; a second portion having dimension operable for disposal in the at least one opening; and deflecting a spring to apply a force to the second portion of the passive heat exchanger in a direction of the at least one secondary device.
In Example 18, each of the first portion and the second portion of the heat exchanger of the method of Example 17 includes a heatsink base and a fin structure and the spring is disposed between the first sink base and the at least one second heatsink base.
In Example 19, each of the first portion and the second portion of the heat exchanger of the method of Example 17 includes a heatsink base and a fin structure and the spring is disposed across a dimension of the fin structure of the second portion of the heat exchanger.
In Example 20, each of the first portion and the second portion of the heat exchanger of the method of Example 17 includes a heatsink base and a fin structure and the heatsink base of the first portion has a thickness operable to justify the heatsink base with the primary device.
In Example 21, a multi-chip package assembly including a heat exchanger is made by any of the methods of Examples 17-20.
The above description of illustrated implementations of the invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. While specific implementations of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
These modifications may be made to the invention in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific implementations disclosed in the specification and the claims. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined entirely by the following claims, which are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/057922 | 9/27/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/048384 | 3/31/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5808236 | Brezina | Sep 1998 | A |
5862038 | Suzuki | Jan 1999 | A |
7113406 | Nguyen | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7495922 | Ploeg | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20060176666 | Saturley | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080266808 | Aberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090085187 | Scott | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090321901 | Lopez et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110088874 | Meyer, IV et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120162922 | Cheyne et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130258599 | Danello et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140002989 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140239482 | Kourakata et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20160118315 | Smith | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160284624 | Yamada | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101305460 | Nov 2008 | CN |
04-263457 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H10 70383 | Mar 1998 | JP |
3139706 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2014-138018 | Jul 2014 | JP |
134358 | Oct 2013 | RU |
WO 2014148026 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for Int. application No. PCT/US2014/057922 dated Jun. 26, 2015. |
Intel Corporation, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/057922, (dated Mar. 28, 2017). |
Intel Corporation, “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/918,119, (dated Jan. 30, 2017). |
Intel Corporation, “Office Action with search report”, TW Application No. 104127518, (dated May 22, 2017). |
Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14902341.8 dated May 7, 2018, 9 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Patent Application No. 2017105797, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 13 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-511160, dated Apr. 3, 2018, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480081475.6, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 7 pages, no translation. |
Notice of Allowance for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-511160 dated Oct. 9, 2018, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160276243 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |