This present invention relates to polishing pads used in during chemical mechanical polishing.
An integrated circuit is typically formed on a substrate by the sequential deposition of conductive, semiconductive or insulative layers on a silicon wafer. One fabrication step involves depositing a filler layer over a non-planar surface, and planarizing the filler layer until the non-planar surface is exposed. For example, a conductive filler layer can be deposited on a patterned insulative layer to fill the trenches or holes in the insulative layer. The filler layer is then polished until the raised pattern of the insulative layer is exposed. After planarization, the portions of the conductive layer remaining between the raised pattern of the insulative layer form vias, plugs and lines that provide conductive paths between thin film circuits on the substrate. In addition, planarization is needed to planarize the substrate surface for photolithography.
Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is one accepted method of planarization. This planarization method typically requires that the substrate be mounted on a carrier or polishing head. The exposed surface of the substrate is placed against the polishing surface of a polishing pad, such as a rotating polishing disk or linearly advancing belt. The carrier head provides a controllable load on the substrate to push it against the polishing pad. A polishing liquid, which can include abrasive particles, is supplied to the surface of the polishing pad, and the relative motion between the substrate and polishing pad results in planarization and polishing.
Conventional polishing pads include “standard” pads and fixed-abrasive pads. A typical standard pad has a polyurethane polishing layer with a durable roughened surface, and can also include a compressible backing layer. In contrast, a fixed-abrasive pad has abrasive particles held in a containment media, and can be supported on a generally incompressible backing layer.
One objective of a chemical mechanical polishing process is to achieve topology uniformity across the substrate. Another object is to achieve polishing uniformity. If different areas on the substrate are polished at different rates, then it is possible for some areas of the substrate to have too much material removed (“overpolishing”) or too little material removed (“underpolishing”), which can result in non-uniform topography across the substrate.
In one aspect, the invention is directed to a polishing pad with a polishing layer and a backing layer secured to the polishing layer. The polishing layer has a polishing surface, a first thickness, a first compressibility, a hardness between about 40 to 80 Shore D, and a thickness non-uniformity. The backing layer has a second thickness and a second compressibility greater than the first compressibility. The first thickness, first compressibility, second thickness and second compressibility are such that the polishing surface deflects, under an applied pressure of 1.5 psi or less, more than the thickness non-uniformity of the polishing layer.
Implementations of the invention can include one or more of the following features. The second thickness may be greater than the first thickness, or about the same as the first thickness. The backing layer may have a hardness between about 1 and 10 Shore A. The backing layer may have second thickness between about 30 and 200 mils, e.g., between about 30 and 90 mils. A plurality of grooves may be formed in the polishing surface. A recess may be formed in a bottom surface of the polishing layer, and an aperture may be formed in the backing layer aligned with the recess. A conductive sheet may be secured to the backing layer on a side opposite the polishing layer. A plurality of holes may be formed through the polishing layer and the backing layer to expose the conductive sheet. A solid light-transmissive portion may be positioned in the polishing layer. An aperture may be formed in the backing layer aligned with the light-transmissive portion. A light-transmissive adhesion layer may be on the side of the backing layer opposite the polishing layer, and the adhesion layer may span the aperture on the backing layer. A fluid-impermeable transparent sheet may be between the backing layer and the polishing layer. An outer edge of the polishing layer may overhang an outer edge of the backing layer. The backing layer may have a product of the second thickness and second compressibility of 2 mils or more, at an applied pressure of 1.5 psi or less. The backing layer may include a polyurethane, polyether or polysilicone foam.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a polishing pad with a polishing pad having a polishing surface, a solid light-transmissive portion positioned in the polishing layer, a backing layer on a side of the polishing layer opposite the polishing surface, and a light-transmissive adhesion layer on the side of the backing layer opposite the polishing layer. The backing layer has an aperture aligned with the light-transmissive portion, and the light-transmissive adhesion layer spans the aperture on the backing layer.
Implementations of the invention can include one or more of the following features. The adhesion layer may abut the backing layer. The backing layer may be connected directly to the polishing layer by an adhesive. A conductive layer may be on a side of the adhesion layer opposite the backing layer, e.g., the conductive layer may abut the adhesion layer. The backing layer may be more compressible than the polishing layer. The adhesion layer may include a double-sided adhesive tape. The adhesion layer may include a polyethylene terephthalate film. The window may be integrally molded in the polishing layer, or may be secured in an aperture in the polishing layer by an adhesive. A fluid-impermeable transparent sheet may be between the backing layer and the polishing layer.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a polishing pad with a polishing layer having a polishing surface and a backing layer on a side of the polishing layer opposite the polishing surface. An outer edge of the polishing layer overhangs an outer edge of the backing layer.
Implementations of the invention can include one or more of the following features. The polishing layer and backing layer may be substantially circular, and a diameter of the backing layer may be less than a diameter of the polishing layer. The backing layer may be more compressible than the polishing layer. The outer edge of the polishing layer may overhang the outer edge of the backing layer by about one-quarter inch. The polishing layer and backing layer may be secured by an adhesive.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a polishing pad that has a polishing layer having a polishing surface, a solid light-transmissive portion positioned in the polishing layer, a backing layer on a side of the polishing layer opposite the polishing surface, a fluid-impermeable transparent sheet between the backing layer and the polishing layer, a light-transmissive adhesion layer on the side of the backing layer opposite the polishing layer, and a conductive layer on a side of the adhesion layer opposite the backing layer. The backing layer has an aperture aligned with the light-transmissive portion, and the transparent sheet spans the solid light-transmissive portion.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a substrate processing apparatus. The apparatus can include a pad support, a polishing pad according to one of the aspects discussed above, a carrier head to hold a substrate in contact with the polishing pad, a supply of processing fluid, and a motor connected to at least one of the pad support and the carrier head to cause relative motion between the processing pad and the substrate.
Implementations of the invention can include one or more of the following features. The apparatus may include an electrode positioned to contact the substrate, a cathode contacting the processing fluid, and a power supply coupled between the electrode and the cathode to create a bias.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a method of chemical mechanical processing. The method includes bringing a substrate into contact with a polishing surface of a polishing layer of a polishing pad according to one of the aspects discussed above, supplying a polishing liquid to the polishing surface, creating relative motion between the substrate and the polishing surface, and applying a pressure to the substrate to press the substrate against the polishing pad.
Implementations of the invention can include one or more of the following features. The applied pressure may be 1.5 psi or less, and the polishing surface may deflects more than a thickness non-uniformity of the polishing layer under the applied pressure. Supplying the polishing liquid may include supplying an electrolyte, and the method may further include applying a bias between a cathode exposed to the electrolyte and the substrate.
Any of the various implementations discussed above may also be applicable to any of the various aspects of the invention.
Potential advantages of the invention may include one or more of the following. Polishing uniformity across the substrate may be improved, particularly at low pressures, e.g. below 1.5 or 1.0 psi or 0.8 psi, or even below 0.5 psi or 0.3 psi. Consequently, materials, such as low-k dielectric materials, that require low-pressure polishing to avoid irreversible damage, such as delamination, can be polished with an acceptable degree of uniformity. In addition, the polishing pad can provide good mechanical contact to the substrate surface when the substrate is polished at low down force and/or the substrate is not flat due to internal stress induced by multiple levels of conductive and dielectric layers. The likelihood of premature pad failure, such as premature detachment of the pad from the platen in the region around the window, can be reduced, thereby increasing polishing pad lifetime. The likelihood of polishing liquid seeping into the backing layer can be reduced.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
As mentioned above, and referring to FIG 1A, a conventional polishing pad 60 can have a polyurethane covering layer 64 with a durable rough polishing surface 66 and a compressible backing layer 62 with about the same thickness as the covering layer. In addition, there may be small variations in the thickness of the covering layer 64, e.g., on the order of a few mils, e.g., about 1-2 mil, across the polishing pad (for clarity, the variations are significantly exaggerated in
For example, one polishing pad commercially available from Rodel, Inc., has a covering layer formed of polyurethane with embedded hollow microspheres (IC1000) and a backing layer formed of polyurethane impregnated polyester felt (Suba IV). The covering layer has a thickness of 50 or 80 mils and a hardness of 52-62 on the Shore D scale, whereas the backing layer has a thickness of 50 mils and a hardness of about 61 on the Shore A scale.
Unfortunately, the conventional polishing pad can result in unacceptable polishing uniformity at low pressures, e.g., below 1.5 psi or below 1.0 psi, and particularly at very low pressures, e.g., below 0.5 psi. Without being limited to any particular theory, it may be that the dimensions and physical properties of the standard polishing pad are such that, at low polishing pressures, the backing layer remains rigid enough that the downward pressure of the substrate 14 is not sufficient to completely “flatten out” the covering layer. Consequently, as shown in
In contrast to these conventional polishing pads, one implementation of the polishing pad of the present invention has a thinner covering layer and a thicker and more compressible backing layer. Again without being limited to any particular theory, the reduced thickness of the covering layer may make it easier to deflect. In addition, the increased thickness and compressibility of the backing layer may make the covering layer easier to deflect. As a result, even at very low polishing pressures, the covering layer can be conformed to the substrate (for example, if the substrate is flat as shown then the covering layer will be flattened out, whereas if the substrate is warped then the covering layer will conform to have the same shape) so that thickness variations in the covering layer need not adversely impact the polishing uniformity, and so that good mechanical contact is created between the substrate and the polishing surface so as to provide a high polishing rate and a shorter polishing time.
Turning now to
The polishing station 10 includes a rotatable platen 16 on which is placed a polishing pad 18. As described below, the polishing pad 18 is a two-layer polishing pad with a soft backing layer 20 and a hard durable outer layer 22 with a substantially uniform composition. The durable outer covering layer 22 provides a polishing surface 24. The polishing station can also include a pad conditioner apparatus to maintain the condition of the surface of the polishing pad so that it will effectively polish substrates.
During a polishing step, a polishing fluid 30, e.g., a slurry, can be supplied to the surface of polishing pad 18 by a slurry supply port or combined slurry/rinse arm 32. Slurry 30 can contain abrasive particles, a pH adjuster, or chemically active components.
The substrate 14 is held against the polishing pad 18 by a carrier head 34. The carrier head 34 is suspended from a support structure, such as a carousel, and is connected by a carrier drive shaft 36 to a carrier head rotation motor so that the carrier head can rotate about an axis 38.
Referring to
The covering layer 22 is thin, e.g., less than 50 mils, such as 40 mils or less, or 25 mils or less, or 20 mils or less, or 15 mils or less. In general, the covering layer 22 is as thin as possible, subject to manufacturability. However, the conditioning process tends to wear away the cover layer. Therefore, a thickness of the covering layer can be selected to provide the polishing pad with a useful lifetime, e.g., 3000 polishing and conditioning cycles. For example, the covering layer can have a thickness of 5 to 10 mils. A thickness between about 5 and 20 mils should be appropriate. There may be thickness non-uniformities across the pad of about 1-3 mils, although larger non-uniformities are possible (these non-uniformities refer to the global variations in thickness across the polishing pad caused by the pad fabrication process, rather than discrete thickness variations at a small scale (e.g., less than 100 mils), such as grooves, perforations, or surface roughness).
Optionally, at least a portion of the polishing surface 24 can include a plurality of grooves 26 formed therein for carrying slurry. The grooves may be of nearly any pattern, such as concentric circles, straight lines, a cross-hatched, spirals, and the like. The grooves 26 can extend through about 20-80%, e.g., 25%, of the thickness of the covering layer 22. For example, in a polishing pad having an covering layer 22 that is 20 mils thick, the grooves 26 can have a depth D1 of about 5 mils.
The backing layer 20 is a compressible material that is softer and more compressible than the covering layer 22. For example, the backing layer can be an open-cell or a closed-cell foam, such as polyurethane, polyether or polysilicone with voids, so that under pressure the cells collapse and the backing layer compresses. It is permissible for the material of the backing layer 20 to be laterally displaced under pressure from the substrate. The backing layer 20 can have a hardness of 20 or less on the Shore A scale, e.g., 12 or less, e.g., between 1 and 10 Shore A, e.g., 5 or less.
As mentioned above, the backing layer 20 should be more compressible than the covering layer 22. Compressibility may be measured as a percentage thickness change at a given pressure. For example, under a pressure of about 0.5 psi, the backing layer 20 can undergo about 3% compression. A suitable material for the backing layer is PORON 4701-30 from Rogers Corporation, in Rogers, Conn. (PORON is a trademark of Rogers Corporation).
In addition, the backing layer 20 is thick, e.g., 90 mils or more. For example, the backing layer may be about 95 to 500 mils thick, such as 95 to 200 mils, or 95 to 150 mils, or 95 to 125 mils. In particular, the backing layer 20 may be about 2 to 15 times as thick as the covering layer 22, e.g., 4.5 to 8 times as thick (particularly for a 20 mil thick covering layer).
In general, the thickness of the backing layer 20 is selected to ensure that, given the compressibility of the backing layer 20 and the rigidity of the covering layer 22, the covering layer will deflect at very low pressures, e.g., pressures of 0.5 psi or less, an amount at least equal to any non-uniformity in the thickness of the covering layer, e.g., a few mils, e.g., about 2 mil (the non-uniformities are not shown in
Moreover, the backing layer should be sufficiently compressible that at the operating pressures of interest, e.g., at 1.5 psi to 0.1 psi, the polishing pad is below the maximum compressibility of the polishing pad. The backing layer can have a maximum compressibility greater than 10%, or greater than 20%. In one implementation, the backing layer can have a compressibility of 25% at pressures of 3 to 8 psi, with a maximum compressibility that is even higher.
The backing layer can have a compression force deflection range of 1 to 10 psi (0.2 inches strain rate force at 25% deflection).
In brief, at pressures of 1.5 psi or below (and possibly at 1.0 psi or below, 0.8 psi or below, or 0.5 psi or below, or 0.3 psi or below), the backing layer can have a product of the compressibility and thickness (C-D) that is greater than the non-uniformities in thickness of the cover layer. For example, at pressures of 0.8 psi or below (and possibly at 0.5 psi or below), the backing layer can have a product of the compressibility and thickness (C-D) of a few mils, e.g., 2 mils, or more (and possibly 3 mils or more).
Hydrostatic modulus K may be measured as applied pressure (P) divided volumetric strain (ΔV/V), i.e., K=PV/ΔV. Assuming that the backing layer undergoes pure compression (i.e., material is not displaced laterally under the applied pressure), then the hydrostatic modulus K equals the applied pressure divided by the compression (ΔD/D). Thus, assuming that the backing layer undergoes at least 2% pure compression at 0.5 psi, the backing layer would have a compressibility modulus K of 25 or less. On the other hand, if even lower pressures are to be use, e.g., pressures of 0.1 psi, then the backing layer 20 should have a compressibility modulus of 5 or less. The backing layer may have a compressibility modulus K of 50 psi or less per psi of applied pressure in the range of 0.1 to 1.0 psi. Of course, if the material of the backing layer does undergo lateral displacement under compression, then the volumetric strain will be somewhat less than the compression, so the hydrostatic modulus may be somewhat higher.
Referring to
In one implementation, the covering layer 22 can be manufactured, e.g., by a molding process, with grooves preformed in the upper surface of the covering layer. In a molding process, e.g., injection molding or compression molding, the pad material cures or sets in a mold that has indentations that form the grooves recess. Alternatively, the covering layer 22 can be manufactured by a more conventional technique, e.g., by skiving a thin sheet of pad material from a cast block. The grooves can then be formed by machining or milling the top surface of the covering layer, respectively.
Once the backing layer 20 and covering layer 22 have been manufactured, they can be secured, e.g., with a thin adhesive layer 28, such as a pressure-sensitive adhesive.
Referring to
For example, the covering layer 22 can have a hardness of about 30 to 80, e.g., 50 to 65, on the Shore D scale, and can have a thickness between about 30 and 90 mils, e.g., 50 or 80 mils. The backing layer can be an open-cell foam or a closed-cell foam, such as polyurethane, polyether or polysilicone with voids. The backing layer 20 can have a hardness of 20 or less on the Shore A scale, e.g., 12 or less, e.g., between 1 and 10 Shore A, e.g., 5 or less, and can have a thickness that is about the same or less than that of the cover layer, e.g., 30 to 90 mils, e.g., 50 mils.
In use, the polishing pad 18 can be secured to the platen with an adhesive layer. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In this implementation, the grooves 26 do not extend over the thin section 74 in the covering layer 22. Thus, the polishing surface 24 of the polishing pad includes portions with and without grooves, and the indentation is located in one of the portions without grooves. The grooves 26 can be sufficiently deep that they extend to or past the plane defined by the inner surface of the recess 70.
Referring to
Alternatively, a window could be formed in the polishing pad without use of the transparent sheet. For example, a solid transparent portion can be formed in the covering layer 22, and an aperture can be formed in the backing layer 20 that is aligned with the solid transparent portion. The transparent portion can be formed by cutting an aperture in the covering layer 22 and securing a transparent plug with an adhesive. Alternatively, the transparent portion can be formed by placing an insert of transparent material in a liquid pad material, curing the liquid pad material so that the insert is integrally molded into the block of solidified pad, and then skiving off the covering layer from the block.
In both these implementations, the adhesive layer 50 can be removed from the region of the optical port or window.
In addition, instead of being removed from the region of the optical port or window, the adhesive layer 50 can be substantially transparent and can span the optical port. For example, referring to
The adhesive layer 50 spans the bottom surface of the backing layer 20, including the aperture 58. The adhesive layer can be a double-sided adhesive tape, such a thin, e.g., 2 mil thick, polyethylene terephthalate sheet coated on both sides with adhesive. To manufacture the polishing pad shown in
A potential advantage of having the adhesive layer 50 span the aperture 58 is reduced likelihood of failure of the window and consequently increased lifetime of the polishing pad. Without being limited to any particular theory, if the adhesive layer 50 does not span the aperture 58, then adhesion of the polishing pad to the platen around the window is reduced, such that cycling of pressure during substrate loading and unloading from the pad can cause failure of the attachment of the polishing pad to the platen around the window, thus causing the portion of the pad around the window to distort and create polishing nonuniformities. In contrast, the adhesive layer 50 spanning the window reinforces adhesion to the platen surface, thereby reducing the likelihood of pad failure. Optionally, as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The polishing pads of
In electrochemical mechanical polishing, conductive material, such as copper, is removed from the substrate surface by electrochemical dissolution while the substrate surface is concurrently polished. The substrate surface is placed in an electrolyte (which also serves as the polishing fluid), and a bias is applied between the substrate and a cathode that is in contact with the electrolyte. The ECMP can be performed at low or very low pressures, such as less than 1 psi, such 0.8 psi or less, or 0.5 psi or less, or 0.3 psi or less.
For example, referring to
In electrochemical deposition, the bias voltage is reversed, so that the substrate surface becomes the cathode, the electrode in contact with the electrolyte becomes the anode, and conductive material is electrodeposited onto the substrate. If this is performed while the substrate is contacting a moving processing pad at low pressure, then material will be preferrentially deposited into any trenches in the dielectric layer.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
For example, an adhesive layer can be applied to the bottom surface of the polishing pad to secure the pad to the platen, and the adhesive layer can be covered by a removable liner. In implementations using the transparent sheet, the transparent sheet need not span the entire polishing pad; the transparent sheet could be just large enough to span each aperture to seal the window.
Either the polishing pad, or the carrier head, or both can move to provide relative motion between the polishing surface and the substrate. The polishing pad can be a circular (or some other shape) pad secured to the platen, a tape extending between supply and take-up rollers, or a continuous belt. The polishing pad can be affixed on a platen, incrementally advanced over a platen between polishing operations, or driven continuously over the platen during polishing. The pad can be secured to the platen during polishing, or there could be a fluid bearing between the platen and polishing pad during polishing. In addition, although terms of vertical positioning are used, it should be understood that the polishing surface and substrate could be held upside down, in a vertical orientation, or in some other orientation.
Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/956,617, filed on Oct. 1, 2004, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/508,321, filed on Oct. 3, 2003. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/773,868, filed on Feb. 6, 2004 now abandoned. The entire disclosure of each of the above-referenced applications is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3499250 | Jensen et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3504457 | Jacobsen et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
4512113 | Budinger | Apr 1985 | A |
4839206 | Waldenberger | Jun 1989 | A |
4879258 | Fisher | Nov 1989 | A |
4927485 | Cheng et al. | May 1990 | A |
5081796 | Schultz | Jan 1992 | A |
5177908 | Tuttle | Jan 1993 | A |
5196353 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5257478 | Hyde et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297364 | Tuttle | Mar 1994 | A |
5329734 | Yu | Jul 1994 | A |
5413941 | Koos et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433651 | Lustig et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5486129 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489233 | Cook et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499733 | Litvak | Mar 1996 | A |
5559428 | Li et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5605760 | Roberts | Feb 1997 | A |
5609511 | Moriyama et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5663797 | Sandhu | Sep 1997 | A |
5672091 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5738574 | Tolles et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5791969 | Lund | Aug 1998 | A |
5791975 | Cesna et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838447 | Hiyama et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5872633 | Holzapfel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893796 | Birang et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5921855 | Osterheld et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949927 | Tang | Sep 1999 | A |
5964643 | Birang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6033293 | Crevasse et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045439 | Birang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068539 | Bajaj et al. | May 2000 | A |
6093085 | Yellitz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6135856 | Tjaden et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146248 | Jairath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159073 | Wiswesser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179709 | Redeker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6261168 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261959 | Travis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280290 | Birang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306021 | Masumura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328642 | Pant et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331135 | Sabde et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354915 | James et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358130 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368184 | Beckage | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390891 | Guha et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399501 | Birang et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6402591 | Thornton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406363 | Xu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406591 | Beckstrom et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422927 | Zuniga | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428394 | Mooring et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450868 | Zuniga et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458014 | Ihsikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475332 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482307 | Ashjaee et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488575 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497800 | Talieh et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497806 | Endo | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517426 | Lee | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520843 | Halley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524164 | Tolles | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537133 | Birang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537144 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551179 | Halley | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561873 | Tsai et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561889 | Xu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569004 | Pham | May 2003 | B1 |
6572463 | Xu et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6572755 | Emesh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585579 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602724 | Redeker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612917 | Bruxvoort | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626740 | Baker, III et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632129 | Goetz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638143 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6676717 | Birang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6705934 | Shiro et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719818 | Birang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6776692 | Zuniga et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6802955 | Emesh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811680 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824447 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832950 | Wright et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6848974 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855034 | Hasegawa | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857945 | Chen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6884153 | Manens et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884156 | Prasad et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6905402 | Allison et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913517 | Prasad | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924641 | Hanawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6935931 | Prasad | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960120 | Prasad | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960521 | Moon et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7112121 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7132070 | Shih et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7192340 | Ono et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010005667 | Tolles et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010036746 | Sato et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004357 | Baker, III et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020020621 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020077031 | Johansson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102853 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108861 | Emesh et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119286 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130049 | Chen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020164925 | Swedek et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193054 | Smith | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193059 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030104768 | Carlson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030209448 | Hu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213703 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220053 | Manens et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040020788 | Mavliev et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020789 | Hu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023495 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023610 | Hu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082289 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121708 | Hu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134792 | Butterfield et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040163946 | Chang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050000801 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050064802 | Wiswesser et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098446 | Tsai et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050173259 | Mavliev et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070015448 | Swisher et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080038999 | Manens et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057845 | Prasad | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
57-138575 | Aug 1982 | JP |
62-211927 | Jan 1983 | JP |
03-234467 | Aug 1987 | JP |
05-138531 | Sep 1987 | JP |
02-222533 | Sep 1990 | JP |
05-309558 | Sep 1990 | JP |
60-037076 | Oct 1991 | JP |
07-052032 | Jun 1993 | JP |
09-036072 | Nov 1993 | JP |
200404648 | Apr 2004 | TW |
WO 9320976 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO02075804 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 0285570 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02085570 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050221723 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60508321 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10956617 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11043361 | US | |
Parent | 10773868 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 10956617 | US |