One of the primary steps in the fabrication of modern semiconductor devices is the formation of a layer, such as a silicon oxide layer, on a substrate or wafer. As is well known, such a layer can be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In a conventional thermal CVD process, reactive gases are supplied to the substrate surface where heat-induced chemical reactions take place to form the desired film. In a conventional plasma CVD process, a controlled plasma is formed using, for example, radio frequency (RF) energy or microwave energy to decompose and/or energize reactive species in reactant gases to produce the desired film.
Unwanted deposition on areas such as the walls of the processing chamber also occurs during such CVD processes. As is known in the industry, it is common to remove the unwanted deposition material that builds up on the interior of chamber walls with an in situ chamber clean operation. Common chamber cleaning techniques include the use of an etchant gas, such as fluorine, to remove the deposited material from the chamber walls and other areas. In some processes, the etchant gas is introduced into the chamber and a plasma is formed so that the etchant gas reacts with and removes the deposited material from the chamber walls. Such cleaning procedures are commonly performed between deposition steps for every wafer or every n wafers.
Some semiconductor manufactures employ a remote plasma cleaning process as an alternative to an in situ plasma cleaning, a remote plasma cleaning procedure may be employed in which an etchant plasma is generated remote from the substrate processing chamber by a high density plasma source such as a microwave plasma system, toroidal plasma generator or similar device. Dissociated species from the etchant plasma are then transported to the substrate processing chamber where they can react with and etch away the undesired deposition build up. Remote plasma cleaning procedures are sometimes used by manufacturers because they provide a “softer” etch than in situ plasma cleans, i.e., there is less ion bombardment and/or physical damage to chamber components because the plasma is not in contact with chamber components.
In one known type of remote plasma cleaning procedure, nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is introduced into a remote plasma system (RPS) where it is activated by microwave power. The RPS dissociates the NF3 into reactive fluorine groups (e.g., radical F atoms and ions) that are transported to the substrate processing chamber to react with the residual deposition materials (e.g., silicon oxide) that have built up on the chamber sidewall and other exposed surfaces in the deposition chamber. The RPS system is often mounted on an external surface of the deposition chamber (e.g., the top of the chamber) and flows the activated cleaning gas into the chamber.
The activated cleaning gas may include the activated NF3 source gas to which a carrier gas such as helium or argon (Ar) may optionally be added. The rate at which the activated cleaning gas flows from the RPS into the deposition chamber is often limited by the construction of the RPS. For example, an ASTRONe RPS, manufactured by MKS Instruments Inc., is rated for a 4.0 SLM flow while an ASTRONex RPS system is rated for a 6.0 SLM flow. To keep the flow of the activated cleaning gas circulating through the chamber, a foreline is kept open to connect the chamber to an exhaust (e.g., dry) pump. The vacuum pulled by the dry pump causes cleaning gas to exit the chamber through the foreline.
In the 300 mm Ultimata HDP-CVD chamber, manufactured by Applied Materials, the portion of the foreline through which cleaning gases are exhausted is coupled to a single port running between the chamber and a roughing pump. The port is of a fixed size and has a limited flow capacity that cannot accommodate increased input flows of the cleaning gas beyond a certain point without an increase in the chamber pressure. Thus, when the ASTRON RPS units referred to above are used with the 300 mm Ultima chamber, a flow rate of the activated cleaning gas was typically in the range of between 2 to 4.5 Standard Liters per Minute (SLM). At such flow rates chamber pressure can readily be kept within an ideal range for efficient cleaning. When a higher flow RPS unit that can generate flow of activated cleaning gas in the range of 10 to 15 SLM, the single port foreline cannot remove the gas at a fast enough rate and the chamber pressure rises above an ideal range resulting in a decrease in the cleaning efficiency of the activated cleaning gas. For example, when the cleaning gas pressure climbs above about 9 Torr, more gas is used and the cleaning rate actually decreases compared to a lower chamber pressure. This limitation on the input flow rate of cleaning gas results in longer chamber cleaning times and reduces its throughput or productivity.
In view of the above, the inventors have recognized a need for new foreline designs that can maintain the cleaning gas pressure in a deposition chamber at an optimum level when the input flow rate is increased. Embodiments of the invention include an improved foreline design where multiple ports (e.g., two or more ports) may be used in the foreline to remove spent cleaning gases from the chamber.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a multi-port exhaust foreline for purging fluids from a substrate processing chamber is provided where the foreline includes first, second and third ports independently coupled to the chamber. The first, second and third ports are fluidly coupled together and merge into a single port that is operatively coupled to an exit vacuum. In one specific embodiment, the three ports intersect at a cross fitting that has a fourth port that is coupled to the exit vacuum.
According to another embodiment, a substrate processing system is provided that comprises a substrate processing chamber having a substrate processing region within the chamber; a substrate support having a substrate receiving surface positioned within the substrate processing chamber for securing a substrate during substrate processing in the substrate processing region of the chamber; and a gas exhaust system comprising a turbo molecular pump, a gate valve that can be closed to fluidly isolate the turbo molecular pump from the chamber and first and second gas exhaust pathways that are fluidly coupled to an exhaust foreline. The first gas exhaust pathway includes a first conduit coupled to a port positioned on the substrate processing system to exhaust gases pumped through the turbo molecular pump from the substrate processing chamber into the exhaust foreline. The second exhaust pathway includes at least second and third conduits coupled to second and third interface ports positioned on the substrate processing system to, when the gate valve is closed fluidly isolating the turbo molecular pump from the chamber, exhaust gases from the substrate processing chamber into the exhaust foreline. In some embodiments of the substrate processing system, the second gas exhaust pathway includes a fourth conduit coupled to a fourth interface port positioned on the substrate processing system to, when the gate valve is closed fluidly isolating the turbo molecular pump from the chamber, exhaust gases from the substrate processing chamber into the exhaust foreline. Also, in some embodiments, the second, third and fourth interface ports are positioned in substantially the same horizontal plane and spaced approximately 90 degrees from each other and positioned below the substrate support. The substrate processing system may include a roughing pump operatively coupled to the exhaust foreline downstream from the first, second, third and fourth conduits as well as a second throttle valve operatively coupled in the second gas passageway between the second, third and fourth conduits and the roughing pump.
In one embodiment a method of cleaning a substrate processing chamber is provided. The method introduces an activated cleaning gas mixture into the chamber; reacts at least a portion of the cleaning mixture with residue materials in the chamber; and removes the cleaning mixture from the reaction chamber through multiple exhaust ports fluidly coupled together and operatively coupled to a vacuum pump. The cleaning gas mixture is a fluorine-containing compound generated from a plasma formed outside the chamber in a remote plasma system. In one specific embodiment, the cleaning gas mixture comprises nitrogen tri-fluoride and the activated cleaning gas comprises fluorine ions and fluorine radicals, and is introduced into the chamber at a flow rate between 10-15 SLM while chamber pressure is maintained at or below 9 Torr.
In another embodiment, a method of operating a substrate processing system having a substrate processing chamber and a gas exhaust system comprising a turbo molecular pump, a gate valve that can be closed to fluidly isolate the turbo molecular pump from the substrate processing chamber and first and second gas exhaust pathways that are fluidly coupled to an exhaust foreline is provided. The method includes (i) transferring a substrate into the chamber and performing a substrate processing operation on the substrate by introducing one or more process gases into the chamber while the substrate is positioned within the chamber and exhausting the one or more process gases from the chamber into the exhaust foreline with the turbo molecular pump through a first exhaust pathway fluidly coupled to the chamber at a first port downstream from the turbo molecular pump, wherein unwanted residue material builds-up on interior surfaces of the substrate processing chamber during the substrate processing operation; and (ii) transferring the substrate out of the chamber, closing the gate valve to isolate the turbo molecular pump from the chamber and performing a chamber clean operation by introducing an activated cleaning gas mixture into the chamber, reacting at least a portion of the cleaning mixture with the residue material, and removing the cleaning gas mixture from the chamber through a second exhaust passageway having at least second and third ports fluidly coupled to the chamber upstream from the turbo molecular pump. In one embodiment the second exhaust pathway further includes a fourth port fluidly coupled to the chamber upstream from the turbo molecular pump.
In one specific embodiment, the invention utilizes three vacuum interface ports available on the throttle body of a conventional semiconductor deposition chamber. The three ports, which are upstream of a turbo molecular pump, are fluidly coupled together and to the exhaust foreline to allow increased pumping capability without the need for a major and expensive redesign of existing chambers. Embodiments of the invention also allow existing chambers to be retrofitted from a single port foreline design to a two or three port foreline design to increase the pumping capacity of the existing chamber.
Additional embodiments and features are set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the specification or may be learned by the practice of the invention. The features and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities, combinations, and methods described in the specification.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings wherein like reference numerals are used throughout the several drawings to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sublabel is associated with a reference numeral and follows a hyphen to denote one of multiple similar components. When reference is made to a reference numeral without specification to an existing sublabel, it is intended to refer to all such multiple similar components.
Vacuum system 24 includes a body member 26 that forms a lower portion of chamber 12 and joins the chamber to the vacuum system, and a throttle body 28, which houses a three-blade throttle valve 30 and is attached to a gate valve 32 and a turbo-molecular pump 34, which allow accurate and stable control of chamber pressures as low as about 1 mTorr during substrate processing operations. Gate valve 32 can isolate pump 34 from the throttle body 30 and process region 15.
Vacuum system 24 also includes additional isolation valves 40 and 42, an endpoint detector 44, an additional throttle valve 46 and a roughing pump 48. During substrate processing operations, isolation valve 40 is closed while gate valve 32 and isolation valve 42 are open. Gases are exhausted into a foreline 50 through port 52 and gas conduit 50a. Pressure during substrate processing operations is controlled by throttle valve 30. During a chamber clean operation, gate valve 32 and isolation valve 42 are closed while valve 40 is open. The cleaning gas is exhausted into foreline 50 through port 54 and gas conduit 50b. Pressure during the chamber cleaning operation is controlled by throttle valve 46. Gas conduits 50a and 50b are part of gas foreline 50.
In some CVD chambers 10 such as some Ultima HDP-CVD chambers manufactured by Applied Materials, chamber body 12, body member 26 and throttle body 28 are welded together to form an integral housing. Port 54 on that housing is of a fixed size and can be coupled to the foreline by appropriate fittings. The housing also includes two additional ports not shown in
These additional ports are typically used to couple devices such as a pressure gauge or purge of helium gas to chamber 10. In one embodiment of the invention, however, these additional ports 56, 58 are coupled directly to the foreline with appropriate fittings to provide gas flow paths to the foreline in addition to the path through port 54 during a chamber cleaning operation and thereby increase the pumping capacity of chamber 10 during a chamber cleaning operation.
In certain Ultima HDP-CVD chambers, the center port (port 54) has a larger diameter opening than the side ports (ports 56, 58). Thus, when embodiments of the invention shown in
As shown in
The embodiment of the system shown in
As previously mentioned, a multiport foreline as described above can provide increased pumping capacity during a chamber clean operation to allow for increased flow of activated clean gases during a chamber clean operation. For example, when a 300 mm Ultima HDP-CVD chamber retrofitted with a three port foreline upstream of the turbo molecular pump as described with respect to
Having described several embodiments, it will be recognized by those of skill in the art that various modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents may be used without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example,
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a process” includes a plurality of such processes and reference to “the electrode” includes reference to one or more electrodes and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
Also, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” “include,” “including,” and “includes” when used in this specification and in the following claims are intended to specify the presence of stated features, integers, components, or steps, but they do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, components, steps, acts, or groups.
The present application claims benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional Application No. 60/986,332, filed on Nov. 8, 2007, entitled “Multi-Port Pumping System For Reduced Cleaning Pressure In Dielectric Deposition Chambers,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4147571 | Stringfellow et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4848400 | Grant et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5016332 | Reichelderfer et al. | May 1991 | A |
5081069 | Parker et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5125360 | Nakayama et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5148714 | McDiarmid | Sep 1992 | A |
5252178 | Moslehi | Oct 1993 | A |
5304250 | Sameshima et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5443647 | Aucoin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5558717 | Zhao et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569350 | Osada et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587014 | Iyechika et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5630881 | Ogure et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635409 | Moslehi | Jun 1997 | A |
5683518 | Moore et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5853607 | Zhao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6009830 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021785 | Grutzediek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024044 | Law et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6077412 | Ting et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6156581 | Vaudo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6302964 | Umotoy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6383954 | Wang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387207 | Janakiraman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406677 | Carter et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6447651 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450117 | Murugesh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508879 | Hashimoto | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6528332 | Mahanpour et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6548416 | Han et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6614181 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656540 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660391 | Rose et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660662 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676751 | Solomon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6793733 | Janakiraman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794290 | Papasouliotis et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6812157 | Gadgil | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830624 | Janakiraman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833052 | Li et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6867086 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6884685 | Luo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890403 | Cheung | May 2005 | B2 |
6900067 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6935466 | Lubomirsky et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958112 | Karim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7018902 | Visokay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010006070 | Shang et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010021595 | Jang et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024691 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029892 | Cook et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040099 | Pederson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054387 | Frankel et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020127350 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139307 | Ryding et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163637 | Rossman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185067 | Upham | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030064154 | Laxman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073310 | Olgado et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030094773 | Lerner | May 2003 | A1 |
20030159656 | Tan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172872 | Thakur et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040008334 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040048492 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065253 | Tois et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079118 | M'Saad et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134773 | Pederson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144490 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146661 | Kapoor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159343 | Shimbara et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161899 | Luo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175501 | Lukas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211664 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050001556 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050217578 | Gurary et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250340 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060075967 | Lu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096540 | Choi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060251499 | Lunday et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070080057 | Mizohata et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070128864 | Ma et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070235062 | Fujiwara et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070277734 | Lubomirsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090120584 | Lubomirsky et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1830072 | Jun 2006 | CN |
19654737 | Jul 1997 | DE |
1717848 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1791161 | May 2007 | EP |
09-008014 | Jan 1997 | JP |
2007-324154 | Dec 2007 | JP |
0204793 | Mar 1999 | KR |
1020000011360 | Feb 2000 | KR |
1020020013383 | Feb 2002 | KR |
1020060103640 | Oct 2006 | KR |
WO 03066933 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2005078784 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006014034 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2007140376 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007140424 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090120464 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60986332 | Nov 2007 | US |