Multi-rank memory module that emulates a memory module having a different number of ranks

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10755757
  • Patent Number
    10,755,757
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 11, 2010
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 25, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
A transparent four rank memory module has a front side and a back side. The front side has a third memory rank stacked on a first memory rank. The back side has a fourth memory rank stacked on a second memory rank. An emulator coupled to the memory module activates and controls one individual memory rank from either the first memory rank, the second memory rank, the third memory rank, or the fourth memory rank based on the signals received from a memory controller.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to computer memory. More particularly, the present invention relates to a four rank memory module.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Computers use memory devices for the storage and retrieval of information. These memory devices are often mounted on a memory module to expand the memory capacity of a computer. Sockets on a main board accommodate those memory modules also known as SIMMs or DIMMs.



FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically illustrating a standard memory interface system overview in accordance with a prior art. The system 100 includes a processor 102, a memory controller 104, and a memory module 106. The processor 102 communicates with the memory controller 104 with an address bus 108, a control signal bus 110, and a data bus 112. The memory controller 104 communicates with the memory module 106 with a controller address bus 114, a controller control signal bus 116, and a controller data bus 118. Common system implementations 100 have typically two memory chip selects routed per socket. Common memory module 106 may have two chip selects (one per rank) or four chip selects (two per rank). In one implementation, each chip select from the controller is connected to the corresponding chip select on the memory module. In the second implementation, each chip select from the controller is connected to the two chip selects (those that control one rank) on the memory module. The system chip select signals control individual memory modules ranks. The memory module 106 is coupled to the memory controller 104 through a memory socket.


Standard memory modules such as memory module 106 have either one rank or two rank of memory devices. Each memory device comes in a variety of configurations and families such as 128 Mbit, 256 Mbit, 512 Mbit, and 1024 Mbit DDR SDRAM families. Each of these families is further divided into three distinct flavors such as ×4, ×8, and ×16 data bits. For example, a single 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM family comes in three flavors of:


32M×4 (32 Mega cell of 4-bit each=32M×4-bit=128 Mbit)


16M×8 (16 Mega cell of 8-bit each=16M×8-bit=128 Mbit)


8M×16 (8 Mega cell of 16-bit each=8M×16-bit=128 Mbit)


The example above illustrates that all three different data bits flavors result in the same density of 128 Mbit. As the number of data bits doubles the cell numbers decrease by half. One can build memory modules with similar densities using different data bits flavors.


One method of building a 512 M Byte standard memory module with ECC (64-bit data plus 8-bit ECC=72-bit) includes using 256 Mbit density families of 32M×8 to achieve the density of 512 M Byte as follow:


Rank 0=9×(32M×8) devices=32M×72-bit which equates to 32M×8 Bytes+1 Byte of ECC. This yields a total density of 32M×8 Bytes=256M Byte.


Rank 1=9×(32M×8) devices=32M×72-bit which equates to 32M×8 Bytes+1 Byte of ECC. This yields a total density of 32M×8 Bytes=256M Byte.


Therefore, a two rank memory module with 18 device placements will achieve the 512M Byte density. Furthermore, it should be noted that a standard DDR 184-pin memory module can only fit nine TSSOP placements per side, or a total of 18 placements of TSSOP per module, considering both front and back sides based on a standard defined height limits by JEDEC.


Because memory devices with lower densities are cheaper and more readily available, it may be advantageous to build the above same density memory module using lower densities devices. However, in order to achieve a density of, for example, 512 M Bytes using 128 Mbit density of 16M×8 instead, the memory module needs four ranks configured as follows:


Rank 0=9×(16M×8) devices=16M×72-bit which equates to 16M×8 Bytes+1 of ECC. This would give us a total density of 16M×8 Bytes=128 M Byte.


Rank 1=9×(16M×8) devices=16M×72-bit which equates to 16M×8 Bytes+1 Byte of ECC. This would give us a total density of 16M×8 Bytes=128 M Byte.


Rank 2=9×(16M×8) devices=16M×72-bit which equates to 16M×8 Bytes+1 Byte of ECC. This would give us a total density of 16M×8 Bytes=128 M Byte.


Rank 3=9×(16M×8) devices=16M×72-bit which equates to 16M×8 Bytes+1 Byte of ECC. This would give us a total density of 16M×8 Bytes=128 M Byte.


In order to achieve the above configuration, 4 rows of 9 devices each, totaling 36 placements, are required. As mentioned above, on a standard 184-pin DDR memory module, there is only enough space for 18 TSSOP devices.


The only solution would be, to stack two memory devices together to achieve an extra rank on the same placement space. Although this would solve the placement problem of 36 TSSOP devices, the memory module would still possess four memory ranks. As explained earlier, all standard memory modules have only two chip select signals per memory socket routed. Therefore, such memory module would not be viable.


A need therefore exists for a transparent four rank memory module fitting into a memory socket having two chip select signals routed. A primary purpose of the present invention is to solve these needs and provide further, related advantages.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A transparent four rank memory module has a front side and a back side. The front side has a third memory rank stacked on a first memory rank. The back side has a fourth memory rank stacked on a second memory rank. An emulator coupled to the memory module activates and controls one individual memory rank from either the first memory rank, the second memory rank, the third memory rank, or the fourth memory rank based on the signals received from a memory controller.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the invention.


In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram schematically illustrating a standard memory interface system in accordance with a prior art.



FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating a stacked DDR device in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a diagram schematically illustrating a transparent four rank DDR memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A is a diagram schematically illustrating the front side of a transparent 72-bit registered DDR module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4B is a diagram schematically illustrating the back side of a transparent 72-bit registered DDR module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a truth table for a transparent four rank memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6A is a block diagram schematically illustrating a row address decoding system for a transparent four rank memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6B is a block diagram schematically illustrating a column address decoding system for a transparent four rank memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram schematically illustrating a method for emulating a two rank memory module.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram schematically illustrating a CPLD in a transparent four rank DDR memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention are described herein in the context of a memory module. Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following detailed description of the present invention is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the present invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure. Reference will now be made in detail to implementations of the present invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference indicators will be used throughout the drawings and the following detailed description to refer to the same or like parts.


In the interest of clarity, not all of the routine features of the implementations described herein are shown and described. It will, of course, be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made in order to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with application- and business-related constraints, and that these specific goals will vary from one implementation to another and from one developer to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of engineering for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.


In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the components, process steps, and/or data structures may be implemented using various types of operating systems (OS), computing platforms, firmware, computer programs, computer languages, and/or general-purpose machines. The method can be run as a programmed process running on processing circuitry. The processing circuitry can take the form of numerous combinations of processors and operating systems, or a stand-alone device. The process can be implemented as instructions executed by such hardware, hardware alone, or any combination thereof. The software may be stored on a program storage device readable by a machine.


In addition, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that devices of a less general purpose nature, such as hardwired devices, field programmable logic devices (FPLDs), including field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herein.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a standard stacked DDR 8 bit memory device 200 used in a memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The memory device 200 interfaces with a memory controller (not shown) with three buses: an address bus 202, a control bus 204, and a data bus 206. A differential clock bus 208 is also coupled to the DDR memory device 200.


The address bus 202 conveys the following signals: address[n:0] 210 and BA[1:0] 212.


The control bus 204 conveys the following signals: RAS 214, CAS 216, WE 218, DQM 220, CS[1:0] 222, and CKE[1:0] 224.


The data bus 206 conveys the following signals: data signals [7:0] 226 and DQS 228.


The differential clock bus 208 includes two signals: clk 230, and clk_n 232.



FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of stacked 8 bit memory devices on the front and back side of a memory module 300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The memory module's front side 302 includes a first rank 304 of memory devices 306 (U1 through U9). The first rank 304 is stacked with a third rank 308 of memory devices 306 (U19 through U27). As illustrated in FIG. 3, data bus [7:0] is connected to both ranks' memory devices 306 (U1 and U19). The remaining data buses are connected to their respective ranks' memory devices 306. A chip select signal is coupled to each rank of memory devices. As illustrated in FIG. 3, chip select signal cs0 is connected to the first rank 304 (from U1 to U9) and chip select signal cs2 is connected to the third rank 308 (from U19 to U27).


The memory module's back side 310 includes a second rank 312 of memory devices 306 (U10 through U18). The second rank 312 is stacked with a fourth rank 314 of memory devices 306 (U28 through U36). As illustrated in FIG. 3, data bus [7;0] is connected to both ranks' memory devices 306 (U10 and U28). The remaining data buses are connected to their respective ranks' memory devices 306. A chip select signal is coupled to each rank of memory devices. As illustrated in FIG. 3, chip select signal cs1 is connected to the second rank 312 (from U10 to U18) and chip select signal cs3 is connected to the fourth rank 314 (from U28 to U36).



FIG. 3 also illustrates a total of four chip select signals (cs0, cs1, cs2, and cs3). As illustrated in FIG. 2, the stacked memory device 200 has only two chip select signals: cs[1:0] 222. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the present invention allows the four rank memory modules to communicate with a memory socket having only two chip select signals routed.



FIG. 4A illustrates a schematic diagram of the front side of a transparent 72 bit registered DDR module 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The memory module 400 includes 92 contact pins 402 on the front side for connecting with a memory socket (not shown). The memory module 400 as illustrated in FIG. 4A includes nine 8 bit stacked memory devices 404, nine corresponding Resistor Network (Rn) 406, a register 408, a CPLD 410, a PLL 412, and a SPD 414. The stacking of the 8 bit stacked memory devices 404 was previously illustrated in FIG. 3. Memory devices 404 (U1 through U9) are mounted on a surface of the front side of the memory module 400. Memory devices 404 (U19 through U27) are respectively stacked on memory devices 404 (U1 through U9). Therefore the front side of the four rank memory modules 400 includes two ranks (rank 0 and rank 2).


The register 408 is used to synchronize the incoming address and control signals with respect to differential clock signals 208 (clk and clk_n). Also, the register 408 may eliminate the loading of 36 devices in case of stacking or loading of 18 devices in case of monolithic memory devices from the main controller by separating the controller side signaling with memory side signal loading fan-out.


The PLL 412 is used to generate a zero-delay buffer off of system side input differential clock signals 208 (clk and clk_n). By using a PLL, the system side will not see the loading effect of either 18 differential clock loads or 36 differentials clock loads in the case of stacking memory devices.


The SPD 414 is a simple I2C interface EEPROM to hold information regarding memory module for BIOS during the power-up sequence.


The CPLD 410 emulates a two rank memory module on the four rank memory module 400. CPLD 410 allows a system having a memory socket with only two chip select signals routed to interface with a four rank memory module where typically a two rank memory module couples with the memory socket. The CPLD 410 determines which rank from the four ranks to activate based upon the address and command signals from a memory controller coupled to the memory module 410. The algorithm of CPLD 410 is further described in FIGS. 5 and 7.



FIG. 4B illustrates a schematic diagram of the back side of the transparent 72 bit registered DDR module 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The memory module 400 includes 92 contact pins 416 on the back side for connecting with a memory socket (not shown). Therefore, memory module 400 has a total of 184 different contact pins on the front and back side. The memory module 400 as illustrated in FIG. 4B includes nine 8 bit stacked memory devices 404, nine corresponding Resistor Network (Rn) 406, another register 418. The stacking of the 8 bit stacked memory devices 404 was previously illustrated in FIG. 3. Memory devices 404 (U10 through U18) are mounted on a surface of the back side of the memory module 400. Memory devices 404 (U28 through U36) are respectively stacked on memory devices 404 (U10 through U18). Therefore the back side of the four rank memory module 400 includes two ranks (rank 1 and rank 3).



FIG. 5 illustrates a truth table used in the process of the CPLD 410 to determine which rank is active (rank 0, rank 1, rank 2, or rank 3). CPLD 410 utilized three variables to determine the active rank: the highest address number Add(n), a first chip select signal (CS0), and a second chip select signal (CS1). As previously mentioned, each memory socket includes two active chip select signals (CS0 and CS1). CPLD 410 combines these two variables (CS0 and CS1) with the address number signal 210 from the address bus 202 to determine the active rank. Add(n) includes the highest binary digit from the address number signal 210. For example, the highest address number Add(n) when the address signal 210 is 10010 would be the first digit to the left: “1”.


As illustrated in FIG. 5, rank 0 is active when the Add(n) is 0, CS1 is 1, and CS0 is 0. Rank 1 is active when the Add(n) is 0, CS1 is 0, and CS0 is 1. Rank 2 is active when the Add(n) is 1, CS1 is 1, and CS0 is 0. Rank 3 is active when the Add(n) is 1, CS1 is 0, and CS0 is 1.


Because the row address and column address may differ between different memory device densities, the CPLD may employ two different decoding schemes: a Row Address Decoding scheme, and a Column Address Decoding scheme. The following non-limiting example is used for illustration purposes.


A 512 MByte memory module may be build with either two rank of 256 MByte density per rank or four ranks of 128 MByte density per rank. However, a 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM has different characteristics from a 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM device.


A 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM (16M×8) has the following characteristics:


















Configuration
4M × 8 × 4



Refresh Rate
4K



Row Address
A0-A11



Column Address
A0-A9










A 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM (32M×8) has the following characteristics:


















Configuration
8M × 8 × 4



Refresh Rate
8K



Row Address
A0-A12



Column Address
A0-A9










The size of the column addresses (A0-A9) for both 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM and 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM devices match. However, the size of the row address for the 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM differs by one row address line from the 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM (A12). The CPLD 410 uses a Row Address Decoding scheme to emulate a two rank based on 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM Device Technology memory module with a four rank based on 128 Mbit DDR SDRAM Device Technology memory module. Under this scheme, address lines A0-A11 go to module register 408 and 418 and address lines A12 goes into CPLD 410 along with CS0 and CS1 for proper decoding. Therefore, the extra address line A12 is used by the CPLD to determine which rank (from the four ranks) is active. The decoding is performed as previously illustrated in FIG. 5 above. For example, if address bus (A12-A0) has “1000010101010” and CS0 is “0” and CS1 is “1”, then rank 2 is activated. In this present example, Add(n) for A12 is “1”. The Row Address Decoding scheme is further illustrated in FIG. 6A.



FIG. 6A illustrates a method for decoding row addresses in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. A module connector 602 (for example, the contact pins 402 and 416) sends signals to the CPLD 604, PLL 606, and register 608. The signals sent to CPLD 604 include cs0, cs1, Add(n), CAS, RAS, WE, CLK0, and CLK0_N. The signals sent to PLL 606 include CLK0, and CLK0_N. PLL relays the CLK0 and CLK0_N signals to register 608 and memory devices 306. Register 608 also receives the following signals from module connector 602: Add[n−1;0], RAS, CAS, WE, BA[1:0], CKE.


As illustrated in the example above, the 256 Mbit memory devices has an extra row address line (A12) when compared to the 128 Mbit memory devices. Register 608 of a four rank memory module emulating a two bank memory module receives an address with an address size matching the address size of the lower density memory devices (128 Mbit), i.e. A0-A11. In other words, the address signal from the module connector 608 does not include the extra row address line A12.


CPLD 604 also ensures that all commands for a two rank memory module conveyed by the module connector 602 are also performed on the four rank memory modules. For example, CPLD 604 generates rcs2 and rcs3, besides rcs0 and rcs1 off of CS0, CS1 and Add(n) from the memory controller side. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Auto Precharge all Banks Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Auto Precharge all Banks Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Auto Refresh Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Auto Refresh Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Load Mode Register Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Load Mode Register Commands are issued.


However, as previously mentioned, a memory module may also be built using two device families which only differs in their column address size, and have the same row address size. The following example illustrates this situation and describes the Column Decoding Scheme.


A 1024 Mbyte memory module may be build with either two rank of 512 MByte density per rank or four ranks of 256 MByte density per rank. However, the 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM has different characteristics from a 512 Mbit DDR SDRAM.


A 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM (32M×8) has the following characteristics:


















Configuration
8M × 8 × 4



Refresh Rate
8K



Row Address
A0-A12



Column Address
A0-A9










A 512 Mbit DDR SDRAM (64M×8) has the following characteristics:


















Configuration
16M × 8 × 4



Refresh Rate
8K



Row Address
A0-A12



Column Address
A0-A9, A11










The size of the row addresses (A0-A9) for both 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM and 512 Mbit DDR SDRAM devices match. However, the size of the column address for the 256 Mbit DDR SDRAM differ by one address line from the 512 Mbit DDR SDRAM (A11). The CPLD 410 uses the Column Address Decoding scheme to emulate a two ranks 512 Mbit based DDR SDRAM device Technology memory module with a four ranks 256 Mbit based DDR SDRAM device Technology memory module. Under this scheme, address lines A0-A12 go to module register 408 and 418 and address lines A11 goes into CPLD 410 along with CS0 and CS1 for proper decoding. Therefore, the address line A11 is used by the CPLD to determine which rank (from the four ranks) is active. The decoding is performed as previously illustrated in FIG. 5 above. For example, if address bus (A11, A9-A0) has “100110101010” and CS0 is “0” and CS1 is “1”, then rank 2 is activated. In this present example, Add(n) for A11 is “1”. The Column Address Decoding scheme is further illustrated in FIG. 6B.



FIG. 6B illustrates a method for decoding column addresses in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. A module connector 602 (for example, the contact pins 402 and 416) sends signals to the CPLD 604, PLL 606, and register 608. The signals sent to CPLD 604 include CS0, CS1, Add(n−1), CAS, RAS, WE, CLK0, and CLK0_N. The signals sent to PLL 606 include CLK0, and CLK0_N. PLL relays CLK0 and CLK0_N signals to register 608 and memory devices 306. Register 608 also receives the following signals from module connector 602: Add[n;0], RAS, CAS, WE, BA[1:0], CKE.


As illustrated in the example above, the 512 Mbit memory devices has an extra column address line (A11) when compared to the 256 Mbit memory devices. Register 608 of a four rank memory module emulating a two rank memory module receives an address with an address size matching the address size of the lower density memory devices (256 Mbit), i.e. A0-A12.


CPLD 604 also ensures that all commands for a two rank memory module conveyed by the module connector 602 are also performed on the four rank memory modules. For example, CPLD 604 generates rcs2 and rcs3, besides rcs0 and rcs1 off of CS0, CS1 and Add(n) from the memory controller side. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Auto Precharge all Banks Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Auto Precharge all Banks Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Auto Refresh Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Auto Refresh Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs2 when CS0 Load Mode Register Commands are issued. CPLD 604 also generates rcs3 when CS1 Load Mode Register Commands are issued.


It should be noted that the internal circuitry in the CPLD 410 for Row Address Decoding and Column Address Decoding are different. In particular, in the Column Address Decoding scheme, a unique decoding circuitry is required because in a standard DDR memory module there is only one set of address lines and memory organized as a matrix in such that in order to access an ×4, ×8 or ×16 cell, two set of addresses needs to be provided. First, the Row address needs to be provided with the proper control and command signals then on a separate cycle, the Column address needs to be provided with its proper control and command signals in order to read or write to that particular cell.



FIG. 7 illustrates a method for emulating a two rank memory module with a four rank memory module in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. At 702, the memory module receives a command signal and address signal from a memory controller. The memory controller addressed the command signal and address signal to a two rank memory module. The command signal includes CS0, CS1, CKE, CAS, RAS, and WE. The address signal includes Add(n). At 704, the CPLD of the four rank memory module determines which rank should be active based on the address and command signals (cs0, cs1, and Add(n)). This determination was previously described using the truth table illustrated in FIG. 5. At 706, the CPLD performs either a Row Address Decoding scheme or a Column Address Decoding scheme as previously described to relay the command signals.


It should be noted that the physical address lines and logical address lines are different in this methodology. This is a non-linear addressing versus SRAM which uses linear addressing. In this methodology, a much lower number of pins are used to access the same amount of memory locations as a SRAM device with longer latency due to multiple cycle of providing the Row and Column logical addresses.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram schematically illustrating the internal circuitry of a CPLD used in the transparent four rank DDR memory module. CS0 signal and CS1 signal generate a CS internal signal through logical device 802. The CS signal is transmitted to Load mode register 804, auto refresh 806, and auto precharge detection 808 sub circuitries.


The Load Mode Register circuitry 804 also receives Chip Select (CS) signal, Row Address Strobe (RAS) signal, Column Address Strobe (CAS) signal, and Write Enable signal (WE). This module 804 detects load mode register cycle if inputs are asserted properly to indicate LMR command.


The Auto Refresh circuitry 806 receives Chip Select (CS) signal, Row Address Strobe (RAS) signal, Column Address Strobe (CAS) signal, and Write Enable signal (WE). This module 806 detects auto refresh cycle if inputs are asserted properly to indicate Auto Refresh command.


The Auto Precharge circuitry 808 receives Chip Select (CS) signal, Row Address Strobe (RAS) signal, Column Address Strobe (CAS) signal, and Write Enable (WE) signal. This module 808 detects auto precharge cycle if inputs are asserted properly to indicate auto precharge command.


The output of all three sub circuitries (LMR 804, auto refresh 806 and auto precharge 808) will go to a logical device OR 810 which will drive another level of OR logic 812 and 814 along with either highest address line (814) or it's inverted state (812).


The inverted state drives both MUX wcs0 and wcs1 blocks 816 and 818 which goes to a respective register 820 and 822 and gets fan-out into rcs0 a and rcs0b or rcs1a or rcs1b eventually.


The non-inverted state will drive both MUX wcs2 and wcs3 blocks 824 and 826 which goes to a respective register 828 and 830 and gets fan-out into rcs2a and rcs2b or rcs3a or rcs3b eventually.


Many other families of memory devices or densities of memory devices (not shown) may be used to build the four rank memory module. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the example of four rank memory module described above is not intended to be limiting and that other configuration can be used without departing from the inventive concepts herein disclosed.


While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) memory devices mounted to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR memory devices having a first number of DDR memory devices arranged in a first number of ranks;a circuit mounted to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element and a register, the logic element receiving a set of input control signals from the computer system, the set of input control signals comprising at least one row/column address signal, and at least one chip-select signal, the set of input control signals corresponding to a second number of DDR memory devices arranged in a second number of ranks, the second number of DDR memory devices smaller than the first number of DDR memory devices and the second number of ranks less than the first number of ranks, the circuit generating a set of output control signals in response to the set of input control signals, the set of output control signals corresponding to the first number of DDR memory devices arranged in the first number of ranks, wherein the circuit further responds to a first command signal and the set of input control signals from the computer system by generating and transmitting a second command signal and the set of output control signals to the plurality of memory devices, the first command signal and the set of input control signals corresponding to the second number of ranks and the second command signal and the set of output control signals corresponding to the first number of ranks; and a phase-lock loop device mounted to the printed circuit board, the phase-lock loop device operatively coupled to the plurality of DDR memory devices, and the register;wherein the circuit is configured to store an input control signal of the set of input control signals during a row access procedure and to transmit the stored input control signal as an output control signal of the set of output control signals during a column access procedure.
  • 2. The memory module of claim 1, wherein the set of input control signals comprises a first number of chip-select signals and wherein the set of output control signals comprises a second number of chip-select signals greater than the first number of chip-select signals.
  • 3. The memory module of claim 2, wherein the first number of chip-select signals is two and the second number of chip-select signals is four.
  • 4. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) memory devices mounted to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR memory devices having a first number of DDR memory devices arranged in a first number of ranks;a circuit mounted to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element and a register, the logic element receiving a set of input control signals from the computer system, the set of input control signals comprising at least one row/column address signal, and at least one chip-select signal, the set of input control signals corresponding to a second number of DDR memory devices arranged in a second number of ranks, the second number of DDR memory devices smaller than the first number of DDR memory devices and the second number of ranks less than the first number of ranks, the circuit generating a set of output control signals in response to the set of input control signals, the set of output control signals corresponding to the first number of DDR memory devices arranged in the first number of ranks, wherein the circuit further responds to a first command signal and the set of input control signals from the computer system by generating and transmitting a second command signal and the set of output control signals to the plurality of memory devices, the first command signal and the set of input control signals corresponding to the second number of ranks and the second command signal and the set of output control signals corresponding to the first number of ranks; and a phase-lock loop device mounted to the printed circuit board, the phase-lock loop device operatively coupled to the plurality of DDR memory devices, and the register;wherein the circuit receives and buffers a plurality of row/column address signals of the input control signals during a row access procedure and sends the buffered plurality of row/column address signals to the plurality of DDR memory devices during a subsequent column access procedure.
  • 5. The memory module of claim 1, wherein the logic element comprises an application-specific integrated circuit, a field-programmable gate array, a custom-designed semiconductor device, or a complex programmable-logic device.
  • 6. The memory module of claim 1, wherein the address signals of the set of input control signals are received by both the logic element and the register.
  • 7. The memory module of claim 1, wherein the plurality of DDR memory devices is arranged as a first set of DDR memory devices on a first side of the printed circuit board, a second set of DDR memory devices on the first side of the printed circuit board, a third set of DDR memory devices on a second side of the printed circuit board, and a fourth set of DDR memory devices on the second side of the printed circuit board, the DDR memory devices of the second set spaced from the DDR memory devices of the first set, the DDR memory devices of the fourth set spaced from the DDR memory devices of the third set.
  • 8. The memory module of claim 1, wherein the set of input control signals corresponds to a first memory density, and the set of output control signals corresponds to a second memory density, the second memory density greater than the first memory density.
  • 9. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) memory devices coupled to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR memory devices having a first number of DDR memory devices arranged in a first number of ranks;a circuit coupled to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element and a register, the logic element receiving a set of input signals from the computer system, the set of input signals comprising at least one row/column address signal, and at least one chip-select signal, the set of input signals configured to control a second number of DDR memory devices arranged in a second number of ranks, the second number of DDR memory devices smaller than the first number of DDR memory devices and the second number of ranks less than the first number of ranks, the circuit generating a set of output signals in response to the set of input signals, the set of output signals configured to control the first number of DDR memory devices arranged in the first number of ranks,wherein the circuit further responds to a command signal and the set of input signals from the computer system by selecting at least one rank of the first number of ranks and transmitting the command signal to at least one DDR memory device of the selected at least one rank of the first number of ranks; and a phase-lock loop device coupled to the printed circuit board, the phase-lock loop device operatively coupled to the plurality of DDR memory devices and the register; andwherein the circuit is configured to store an input signal of the set of input signals during a row access procedure and to transmit the stored input signal as an output signal of the set of output signals during a subsequent column access procedure.
  • 10. The memory module of claim 9, wherein the command signal is transmitted to two ranks of the first number of ranks at a time.
  • 11. The memory module of claim 10, wherein the command signal comprises a refresh command signal.
  • 12. The memory module of claim 10, wherein the command signal is transmitted to the two ranks of the first number of ranks concurrently.
  • 13. The memory module of claim 9, wherein the circuit is configured to store an input signal of the set of input signals during a row access procedure for subsequent use during a column access procedure.
  • 14. The memory module of claim 9, wherein the command signal comprises a read command signal or a write command signal, the set of input signals comprises a density bit which is a row address bit, and the circuit is configured to store the row address bit during an activate command for a selected rank.
  • 15. The memory module of claim 9, wherein the logic element comprises an application-specific integrated circuit, a field-programmable gate array, a custom-designed semiconductor device, or a complex programmable-logic device.
  • 16. The memory module of claim 9, wherein the set of input signals comprises a plurality of row/column address signals received and buffered by the register and sent from the register to the plurality of DDR memory devices.
  • 17. The memory module of claim 16, wherein the logic element receives address signals and the command signal from the computer system and the register receives the address signals and the command signal from the computer system.
  • 18. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) devices coupled to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR DRAM devices having a first number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in a first number of ranks;a circuit coupled to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element and a register, the logic element receiving a set of input control signals from the computer system, the set of input control signals comprising a row/column address signal, a chip-select signal, and an input command signal, the set of input control signals configured to control a second number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in a second number of ranks, the second number of DDR DRAM devices smaller than the first number of DDR DRAM devices, the second number of ranks smaller than the first number of ranks, the circuit generating a set of output control signals in response to the set of input control signals, the set of output control signals comprising an output command signal, the set of output control signals configured to control the first number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in the first number of ranks, wherein the circuit further responds to the set of input control signals from the computer system by selecting at least one rank of the first number of ranks and transmitting the set of output control signals to at least one DDR DRAM device of the selected at least one rank; anda phase-lock loop device coupled to the printed circuit board, the phase-lock loop device operatively coupled to the plurality of DDR DRAM devices, and the register;wherein the first number of ranks is four and the second number of ranks is two.
  • 19. The memory module of claim 18, wherein the logic element comprises an application-specific integrated circuit, a field-programmable gate array, a custom-designed semiconductor device, or a complex programmable-logic device.
  • 20. The memory module of claim 18, wherein the set of input control signals comprises fewer chip-select signals than does the set of output control signals.
  • 21. The memory module of claim 20, wherein the set of input control signals comprises two chip-select signals and the set of output control signals comprises four chip-select signals.
  • 22. The memory module of claim 18, wherein the register receives the address signals and the input command signal of the set of input control signals.
  • 23. The memory module of claim 18, wherein the input command signal is a refresh signal and the output command signal is a refresh signal.
  • 24. The memory module of claim 18, wherein the input command signal is a precharge signal and the output command signal is a precharge signal.
  • 25. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) devices coupled to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR DRAM devices having a first number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in a first number of ranks;a circuit coupled to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element and a register, the logic element receiving a set of input control signals from the computer system, the set of input control signals comprising a row/column address signal, a chip-select signal, and an input command signal, the set of input control signals configured to control a second number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in a second number of ranks, the second number of DDR DRAM devices smaller than the first number of DDR DRAM devices, the second number of ranks smaller than the first number of ranks, the circuit generating a set of output control signals in response to the set of input control signals, the set of output control signals comprising an output command signal, the set of output control signals configured to control the first number of DDR DRAM devices arranged in the first number of ranks, wherein the circuit further responds to the set of input control signals from the computer system by selecting at least one rank of the first number of ranks and transmitting the set of output control signals to at least one DDR DRAM device of the selected at least one rank; anda phase-lock loop device coupled to the printed circuit board, the phase-lock loop device operatively coupled to the plurality of DDR DRAM devices, and the register;wherein the circuit is configured to store an input control signal of the set of input control signals during a row access procedure and to transmit the stored input control signal as an output control signal of the set of output control signals during a column access procedure.
  • 26. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board having a first side and a second side;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) memory devices mounted to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR memory devices arranged in two or more ranks which are selectable by a first number of chip-select signals; anda circuit mounted to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element, a register, and a phase-lock loop device operationally coupled to the plurality of DDR memory devices and the register, the circuit receiving a plurality of input signals from the computer system, the plurality of input signals comprising row address signals, column address signals, command signals, and a second number of chip-select signals less than the first number of chip-select signals,wherein the logic element receives an address signal and at least one command signal of the plurality of input signals, the circuit element generating a plurality of output signals in response to the plurality of input signals, the plurality of output signals comprising row address signals, column address signals, command signals, and the first number of chip-select signals, the circuit further responsive to the plurality of input signals by selecting at least one rank of the two or more ranks and transmitting the plurality of output signals to at least one DDR memory device of the selected at least one rank; andwherein the plurality of input signals corresponds to a first memory density, and the plurality of output signals corresponds to a second memory density, the second memory density greater than the first memory density.
  • 27. The memory module of claim 26, wherein the circuit comprises one or more integrated circuit elements selected from the group consisting of: an application-specific integrated circuit, a field-programmable gate array, a custom-designed semiconductor device, and a complex programmable-logic device.
  • 28. The memory module of claim 26, wherein the row address signals and the column address signals of the plurality of input signals are received and buffered by the register and are sent from the register to the plurality of DDR memory devices.
  • 29. The memory module of claim 28, wherein the logic element receives the second number of chip-select signals.
  • 30. The memory module of claim 29, wherein both the register and the logic element receive address signals and at least one command signal of the plurality of input signals.
  • 31. The memory module of claim 26, wherein the circuit is configured to respond to the plurality of input signals by selecting at least one rank of the two or more ranks and transmitting a command signal to at least one DDR memory device of the selected at least one rank.
  • 32. The memory module of claim 26, wherein the circuit is configured to store a signal of the plurality of input signals during a row access procedure and to transmit the stored signal as an output signal of the plurality of output signals during a column access procedure.
  • 33. A memory module connectable to a computer system, the memory module comprising: a printed circuit board having a first side and a second side;a plurality of double-data-rate (DDR) memory devices mounted to the printed circuit board, the plurality of DDR memory devices arranged in two or more ranks which are selectable by a first number of chip-select signals; anda circuit mounted to the printed circuit board, the circuit comprising a logic element, a register, and a phase-lock loop device operationally coupled to the plurality of DDR memory devices and the register, the circuit receiving a plurality of input signals from the computer system, the plurality of input signals comprising row address signals, column address signals, command signals, and a second number of chip-select signals less than the first number of chip-select signals,wherein the logic element receives an address signal and at least one command signal of the plurality of input signals, the circuit element generating a plurality of output signals in response to the plurality of input signals, the plurality of output signals comprising row address signals, column address signals, command signals, and the first number of chip-select signals, the circuit further responsive to the plurality of input signals by selecting at least one rank of the two or more ranks and transmitting the plurality of output signals to at least one DDR memory device of the selected at least one rank;wherein the plurality of output signals corresponds to a first number of DDR memory devices arranged in the two or more ranks which are selectable by the first number of chip-select signals and wherein the plurality of input signals corresponds to a second number of DDR memory devices arranged in ranks which are selectable by the second number of chip-select signals, wherein the memory module simulates a virtual memory module having the second number of DDR memory devices.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/752,151, filed on Jan. 5, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (322)
Number Name Date Kind
4218740 Bennett et al. Aug 1980 A
4249253 Gentili et al. Feb 1981 A
4368515 Nielsen Jan 1983 A
4392212 Miyasaka et al. Jul 1983 A
4571676 Mantellina et al. Feb 1986 A
4592011 Mantellina et al. May 1986 A
4633429 Lewandowski et al. Dec 1986 A
4670748 Williams Jun 1987 A
4706214 Kassai Nov 1987 A
4866603 Chiba Sep 1989 A
4958322 Kosugi et al. Sep 1990 A
4961172 Shubat et al. Oct 1990 A
4961204 Tanaka et al. Oct 1990 A
4980850 Morgan Dec 1990 A
5060188 Zulian et al. Oct 1991 A
5247643 Shottan Sep 1993 A
5272664 Alexander et al. Dec 1993 A
5345412 Shiratsuchi Sep 1994 A
5357487 Coleman et al. Oct 1994 A
5388072 Matick et al. Feb 1995 A
5388240 Olderdissen et al. Feb 1995 A
5392252 Rimpo et al. Feb 1995 A
5426753 Moon Jun 1995 A
5430742 Jeddeloh et al. Jul 1995 A
5463590 Watanabe Oct 1995 A
5483497 Mochizuki et al. Jan 1996 A
5485589 Kocis Jan 1996 A
5495435 Sugahara et al. Feb 1996 A
5513135 Dell et al. Apr 1996 A
5532954 Bechtolsheim et al. Jul 1996 A
5537584 Miyai et al. Jul 1996 A
5541448 Carpenter Jul 1996 A
5559970 Sharma Sep 1996 A
5563839 Herdt et al. Oct 1996 A
5572691 Koudmani Nov 1996 A
5581498 Ludwig et al. Dec 1996 A
5590071 Kolor et al. Dec 1996 A
5602999 Hyatt Feb 1997 A
5617559 Le et al. Apr 1997 A
5638534 Mote, Jr. Jun 1997 A
5649159 Le et al. Jul 1997 A
5655113 Leung et al. Aug 1997 A
5655153 Sandorfi Aug 1997 A
5699542 Mehta et al. Dec 1997 A
5702984 Bertin et al. Dec 1997 A
5703826 Hush et al. Dec 1997 A
5717851 Yishay et al. Feb 1998 A
5729716 Lee et al. Mar 1998 A
5745914 Connolly et al. Apr 1998 A
5724604 Moyer May 1998 A
5764590 Iwamoto et al. Jun 1998 A
5784705 Leung Jul 1998 A
5802395 Connolly et al. Sep 1998 A
5802541 Reed Sep 1998 A
5805520 Anglada et al. Sep 1998 A
5822251 Bruce et al. Oct 1998 A
5870350 Bertin et al. Feb 1999 A
5878051 Sharma et al. Mar 1999 A
5890192 Lee et al. Mar 1999 A
RE36229 Cady Jun 1999 E
5909388 Mueller Jun 1999 A
5926827 Dell et al. Jul 1999 A
5926839 Katayama Jul 1999 A
5936900 Hii et al. Aug 1999 A
5953215 Karabatsos Sep 1999 A
5953280 Matsui Sep 1999 A
5958025 Sonobe Sep 1999 A
5959930 Sakurai Sep 1999 A
5963464 Dell et al. Oct 1999 A
5966736 Gittinger et al. Oct 1999 A
5973392 Senba et al. Oct 1999 A
5974493 Okumura et al. Oct 1999 A
6011710 Wiggers Jan 2000 A
6018787 Ip et al. Jan 2000 A
6023421 Clinton et al. Feb 2000 A
6044032 Li Mar 2000 A
6070217 Connolly et al. May 2000 A
6070227 Rokicki May 2000 A
6097652 Roh Aug 2000 A
6108745 Gupta et al. Aug 2000 A
6112310 Jun et al. Aug 2000 A
6115278 Deneroff et al. Sep 2000 A
6134638 Olarig et al. Oct 2000 A
6145068 Lewis Nov 2000 A
6151271 Lee Nov 2000 A
6154418 Li Nov 2000 A
6154419 Shakkarwar Nov 2000 A
6173357 Ju Jan 2001 B1
6185654 Van Doren Feb 2001 B1
6188641 Uchida Feb 2001 B1
6199142 Saulsbury et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205516 Usami Mar 2001 B1
6209074 Dell et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226709 Goodwin et al. May 2001 B1
6226736 Niot May 2001 B1
6233650 Johnson May 2001 B1
6247088 Seo et al. Jun 2001 B1
6260127 Olarig et al. Jul 2001 B1
6317352 Halbert et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321320 Fleischman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336174 Li et al. Jan 2002 B1
6349051 Klein et al. Feb 2002 B1
6400637 Akamatsu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408356 Dell Jun 2002 B1
6414868 Wong et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415374 Faue et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421279 Tobita et al. Jul 2002 B1
6438062 Curtis et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446158 Karabatsos Sep 2002 B1
6446184 Dell et al. Sep 2002 B2
6453381 Yuan et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459647 Kengeri Oct 2002 B1
6470417 Kolor et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480439 Tokutome et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487102 Halbert et al. Nov 2002 B1
6502161 Perego et al. Dec 2002 B1
6518794 Coteus et al. Feb 2003 B2
6526473 Kim Feb 2003 B1
6530007 Olarig et al. Mar 2003 B2
6530033 Raynham et al. Mar 2003 B1
6553449 Dodd et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553450 Dodd et al. Apr 2003 B1
6587385 Ooishi Jul 2003 B2
6618320 Hasegawa et al. Sep 2003 B2
6618791 Dodd et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621496 Ryan Sep 2003 B1
6625081 Roohparvar et al. Sep 2003 B2
6625687 Halbert et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636935 Ware et al. Oct 2003 B1
6639820 Khandekar et al. Oct 2003 B1
6646949 Ellis et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658509 Bonella et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674684 Shen Jan 2004 B1
6681301 Mehta et al. Jan 2004 B1
6683372 Wong et al. Jan 2004 B1
6697888 Halbert et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700823 Rahman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6705877 Li et al. Mar 2004 B1
6717855 Underwood et al. Apr 2004 B2
6717885 Lai Apr 2004 B2
6721843 Estakhri Apr 2004 B1
6721860 Klien Apr 2004 B2
6738880 Lai et al. May 2004 B2
6742098 Halbert et al. May 2004 B1
6747887 Halbert et al. Jun 2004 B2
6754797 Wu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6769081 Parulkar Jul 2004 B1
6785189 Jacobs et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788592 Nakata et al. Sep 2004 B2
6807125 Coteus et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807650 Lamb et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812869 Rahman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6813196 Park et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832303 Tanaka Dec 2004 B2
6834014 Yoo et al. Dec 2004 B2
6854042 Karabatsos Feb 2005 B1
6880094 LaBerge Apr 2005 B2
6889304 Perego et al. May 2005 B2
6912615 Nicolai Jun 2005 B2
6912628 Wicki et al. Jun 2005 B2
6925028 Hosokawa et al. Aug 2005 B2
6944042 Komatsuzaki Sep 2005 B2
6944694 Pax Sep 2005 B2
6948084 Manapat et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950366 Lapidus Sep 2005 B1
6952368 Miura et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954281 Fukuda et al. Oct 2005 B2
6961281 Wong et al. Nov 2005 B2
6968440 Brueggen Nov 2005 B2
6970968 Holman Nov 2005 B1
6981089 Dodd et al. Dec 2005 B2
6982892 Lee et al. Jan 2006 B2
6982893 Jakobs Jan 2006 B2
6990043 Kuroda et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996686 Doblar et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007130 Holman Feb 2006 B1
7007175 Chang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7046538 Kinsley May 2006 B2
7047361 Chong et al. May 2006 B2
7053470 Sellers et al. May 2006 B1
7054179 Cogdill et al. May 2006 B2
7062618 Tsunoda et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065626 Schumacher et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072231 Pax Jul 2006 B2
7073041 Dwyer et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078793 Ruckerbauer Jul 2006 B2
7089412 Chen Aug 2006 B2
7093066 Klein Aug 2006 B2
7102391 Sun et al. Sep 2006 B1
7120727 Lee et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124260 LaBerge et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127584 Thompson et al. Oct 2006 B1
7130308 Haddock et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130952 Nanki et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133960 Thompson et al. Nov 2006 B1
7133972 Jeddeloh Nov 2006 B2
7136958 Jeddeloh Nov 2006 B2
7142461 Janzen Nov 2006 B2
7149841 LaBerge Dec 2006 B2
7155627 Matsui Dec 2006 B2
7167967 Bungo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168005 Adams et al. Jan 2007 B2
7181591 Tsai et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184916 Resnick et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200021 Raghuram Apr 2007 B2
7203873 Adams et al. Apr 2007 B1
7227910 Lipka Jun 2007 B2
7234099 Gower et al. Jun 2007 B2
7266634 Ware et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266639 Raghuram Sep 2007 B2
7272709 Zitlaw et al. Sep 2007 B2
7281079 Bains et al. Oct 2007 B2
7286436 Bhakta et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289386 Bhakta et al. Oct 2007 B2
7346750 Ishikawa et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356639 Perego et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363422 Perego et al. Apr 2008 B2
7370238 Billick et al. May 2008 B2
7379316 Rajan May 2008 B2
7392442 Averbuj et al. Jun 2008 B2
7409491 Doblar et al. Aug 2008 B2
7411859 Sohn et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421552 Long Sep 2008 B2
7437591 Wong Oct 2008 B1
7461182 Fukushima et al. Dec 2008 B2
7464225 Tsern Dec 2008 B2
7467251 Park et al. Dec 2008 B2
7471538 Hofstra Dec 2008 B2
7532537 Solomon et al. May 2009 B2
7600142 Ichikawa Oct 2009 B2
7619912 Bhakta et al. Nov 2009 B2
7636274 Solomon et al. Dec 2009 B2
7716411 Panabaker et al. May 2010 B2
7818488 Park et al. Oct 2010 B2
7864627 Bhakta et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865674 Gower et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865764 Jester Jan 2011 B2
7881150 Solomon et al. Feb 2011 B2
7916574 Solomon et al. Mar 2011 B1
8001434 Lee et al. Aug 2011 B1
8072837 Solomon et al. Dec 2011 B1
8081535 Bhakta et al. Dec 2011 B2
8081536 Solomon et al. Dec 2011 B1
8081537 Bhakta et al. Dec 2011 B1
8089795 Rajan et al. Jan 2012 B2
8154901 Lee Apr 2012 B1
8189328 Kanapathippillai et al. May 2012 B2
8233303 Best et al. Jul 2012 B2
8250295 Amidi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8301833 Chen et al. Oct 2012 B1
8359501 Lee et al. Jan 2013 B1
8417870 Lee et al. Apr 2013 B2
8516185 Lee et al. Aug 2013 B2
8516187 Chen et al. Aug 2013 B2
8516188 Solomon et al. Aug 2013 B1
8626998 Amidi et al. Jan 2014 B1
8689064 Lee et al. Apr 2014 B1
8756364 Bhakta et al. Jun 2014 B1
8782350 Lee et al. Jul 2014 B2
8787060 Lee et al. Jul 2014 B2
8990489 Amidi et al. Mar 2015 B2
9037774 Solomon et al. May 2015 B2
20010003198 Wu Jun 2001 A1
20010004753 Dell et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010008006 Klein Jul 2001 A1
20010052057 Lai et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020024834 Jeon et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038405 Leddige et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020039323 Tokutome et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020048195 Klein Apr 2002 A1
20020088633 Kong et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030063514 Faue Apr 2003 A1
20030070052 Lai Apr 2003 A1
20030090359 Ok May 2003 A1
20030090879 Doblar et al. May 2003 A1
20030158995 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030191995 Abrosimov et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210575 Seo et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040000708 Rapport et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006729 Pendurkar Jan 2004 A1
20040037158 Coteus et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040098528 Janzen May 2004 A1
20040201968 Tafolla Oct 2004 A1
20050010737 Ware et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050036378 Kawaguchi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044302 Pauley et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060488 Poechmueller Mar 2005 A1
20050132250 Hansen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138267 Bains et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050141273 Park et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142694 Chiou et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050281096 Bhakta et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060039197 Khouri et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060044860 Kinsley et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069896 Sanders Mar 2006 A1
20060080515 Spiers et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060117152 Amidi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126369 Raghuram Jun 2006 A1
20060129755 Raghuram Jun 2006 A1
20060179206 Brittain et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060259711 Oh Nov 2006 A1
20060262586 Solomon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267172 Nguyen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060277355 Ellsberry et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060294295 Fukuzo Dec 2006 A1
20070013429 Katoch et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070070669 Tsern Mar 2007 A1
20080046631 Takaku et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080104352 Talbot May 2008 A1
20080162790 Im Jul 2008 A1
20090031099 Sartore Jan 2009 A1
20090296503 Chu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100070590 Waldman et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100128507 Solomon et al. May 2010 A1
20110016250 Lee et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110016269 Lee et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110085406 Solomon et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110090749 Bhakta et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120239871 Lee et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239874 Lee et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130036264 Amidi et al. Feb 2013 A1
20140040568 Lee et al. Feb 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
1816570 Aug 2007 EP
09237492 Sep 1997 JP
1092169 Apr 1998 JP
10320270 Dec 1998 JP
2000285674 Oct 2000 JP
2000311485 Nov 2000 JP
2002184176 Jun 2002 JP
2003007963 Jan 2003 JP
2008046989 Feb 2008 JP
2012-533793 Dec 2012 JP
WO-9202879 Feb 1992 WO
WO-9407242 Mar 1994 WO
WO-9534030 Dec 1995 WO
WO-02058069 Jul 2002 WO
WO-03017283 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03069484 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2006055497 May 2006 WO
WO-2012061633 May 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (369)
Entry
“8M-Word by 64-bit Synchronous Dynamic RAM Module Unbuffered Type”, NEC Corporation, MOS Integrated Circuit MC-458CB646, (1997), 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694 , Response filed Dec. 23, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2014”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Interview Summary dated Nov. 8, 2013”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2013”, 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Response filed Nov. 12, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2013”, 118 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Updated Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Oct. 12, 2013”, 79 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Claim Charts JEDEC 21C in View of APA, Matsui, and JEDEC 79C”, (Apr. 25, 2013), 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Claim Charts JEDEC 21C in View of APA, Watanabe, and JEDEC 79C”, (Apr. 25, 2013), 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Claim Charts Takeda in View of JEDEC 21-C and JEDEC 79C”, (Apr. 25, 2013), 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Declaration of Dr. Edward P. Sayre Pursuant to 37 CFT 1.132 filed Apr. 25, 2013”, 42 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Third Party Requester Comments After Patent Owner Response Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.947 filed Apr. 25, 2013”, 44 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Third Party Requester Comments to Patent Owner's Response of Jul. 5, 2011 and in Response to the Office's Decision Granting Petition to Waive Page Limit of Jul. 29, 2011 Under 37 CFR 1.947 filed Aug. 29, 2011”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Action Closing Prosecution mailed Mar. 21, 2014”, 106 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Patent Owners Response filed Jan. 14, 2013 to Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2012”, 119 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Third Party Requesters Comments mailed Aug. 14, 2013 to Patent Owners Response filed Jan. 14, 2013 to Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2012”, 290 pgs.
“66/100 MHz PC SDRAM 64-Bit Non-ECCParity 144 Pin Unbuffered SO-DIMM Specification, Revision 1.0”, Intel Corporation, (Feb. 1999), 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Appeal Brief filed Mar. 28, 2008”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 18, 2007”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Oct. 24, 2008”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2007”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2006”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2006”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2007”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2010”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Feb. 8, 2007 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2006”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Jun. 7, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Jun. 8, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2017”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Jun. 26, 2006 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2006”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Jul. 16, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2007”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed Aug. 8, 2008”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed May 14, 2008”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Partial Prosecution History”, (as of Apr. 4, 2011), 1441 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History”, (as of Apr. 20, 2011), 344 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution History”, (as of Apr. 20, 2011), 579 pgs.
“Bank Striping of Data Across Internal SDRAM Banks”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000013697D, (2003).
“DDR SDRAM RDIMM, MT36VDDF12872-1GB, MT36VDDF25672-2GB”, Micron Technology, Inc., (2002), 20 pgs.
“Distributed Memory Mapping”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000014788D, (2000).
“DM74LS138 DM74LS139 DecoderDemultiplexer”, Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, (2000).
“Elipida Memory to Speak at Intel's Memory Implementers Forum Roundtable Event”, Intel Developer Forum, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.elpida.com/en/news/2004/02-18.html>, (Feb. 18, 2004), 2 pgs.
“Information Huawei or FPGA—Take Five”, Electronic News, (2002), 24.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: 200 Pin, PC2700/PC2100/PC1600 DDR SDRAM Unbuffered SO-DIMM Reference Design Specification”, Revision 1.1, Release 11b, (Jan. 2002), 4.20.6: 1-28.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: 144 Pin, PC133 SDRAM Registered Unbuffered SO-DIMM, Reference Design Specification”, Revision 1.02, Release 11, (Oct. 2003), 4.20.3: 1-26.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: 168 Pin, PC133 SDRAM Registered DIMM Design Specification”, Revision 1.4, Release 11a, (Feb. 2002), 4.20.2: 1-75.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: 184 Pin. PC1600/2100 DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DIMM Design Specification”, Revision 1.1, Release 11 b, (Apr. 2003), 4.20.5: 1-40.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: 64 & 72 PIN ZIP/SIMM SRAM Module”, Release 6, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents>, (Jun. 1997), 4.4.1: 1-2.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C: PC2100 and PC1600 DDR SDRAM Registered DIMM Design Specification”, Revision 1.3, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.jedec.org/download/search/4_20_04R13.PDF>, (Jan. 2002), 4.20.4: 1-82.
“JEDEC Standard No. JESD79C: Double Data Rate (DDR) SDRAM Specification”, Revision of JESD79B, (Mar. 2003), 82 pgs.
“JEDEC Standard No. JESD82-4B: Definition of the SSTV16859 2.5 V 13-Bit to 26-Bit SSTL 2 Registered Buffer for Stacked DDR DIMM Applications”, Revision of JESD82-4A, (May 2003), 17 pgs.
“Memory technology evolution: an overview of system memory technologies”, Hewlett-Packard, 7th Edition, (2003).
“Method for a high-performance DRAM address mapping mechanism”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOMOOOOO8164D, (2002).
“Method for memory probing on a multiple-DIMM bus”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000019063D, (2003).
“Method for multiple device interface testing using a single device”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000010054D, (2002).
“PC SDRAM Registered DIMM Design Support Document, Revision 1.2”, Intel Corporation, (Oct. 1998), 61 pgs.
“Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief”, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland Division, Case 4:09-cv-05718-SBA, Document 48, (Filed Jul. 16, 2010), 162 pgs.
“Quad Band Memory (QBM); DDR 200/266/333 devices producing DDR 400/533/667”, Platform Conference, (Jan. 23-24, 2002).
Abali, B., “Memory Expansion Technology (MXT): Software Support and Performance”, IBM J. Res. & Dev., 45(2), (2001), 287-300.
Arlington, D. L, et al., “Enhancement of Memory Card Redundant Bit Usage Via Simplified Fault Alignment Exclusion”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (1987).
Arroyo, R. X, et al., “Method of executing Manufacturing ROM Code Without Removing System Roms”, IP.Com, IP.com No. IPCOM000037214D, (1989).
Barr, Michael, “Programmable Logic: What's it to Ya?”, Embedded Systems Programming, (Jun. 1999), 75-84.
Bennayoun, a., et al., “Input/Output Chip Select Doubler”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 38(4), (1995), 237-240.
Blum, A., et al., “Fast Multichip Memory System With Power Select Signal”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (1979).
Cuppu, V., et al., “A performance comparison of contemporary DRAM architectures”, Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 1999., (1999), 222-233.
Cuppu, V., et al., “Concurrency, latency, or system overhead: Which has the largest impact on uniprocessor DRAM-system performance?”, 28th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2001. Proceedings., (2001), 62-71.
Cuppu, V., et al., “High-performance DRAMs in workstation environments”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 50(11), (2001), 1133-1153.
Denneau, M., “Logic Processor for Logic Simulation Machine”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 25(1), (1982).
Fitzgerald, B. F, et al., “Chip Select Circuit for Multi-Chip RAM Modules”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000044404D, (1984).
Freedman, Alan, “”, The Computer Glossary,⋅ The Complete Illustrated Dictionary, American Management Association, 2001, (2001).
Gray, K. S, “Fet Ram Chip Double Density Scheme”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000043942D, (1984).
Grimes, W. D, et al., “Access Rate/Availability Improvement Logic for Dynamic Memories”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Oct. 1982).
Gupta, P., et al., “Designing and implementing a fast crossbar scheduler”, IEEE Micro, 19(1), (1999), 20-28.
Hession, J., et al., “Chip Select Technique for Multi Chip Decoding”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000070404D, (1978).
Hoare, R., et al., “An 88-Way Multiprocessor Within an FPGA With Customizable Instructions”, Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, (2004), 8 pgs.
Jacob, Bruce L, “Synchronous DRAM Architectures, Organizations, and Alternative Technologies”, University of Maryland, (Dec. 10, 2002).
Jin, Huang, “Embedded Memory in System-On-Chip Design: Architecture and Prototype Implementation”, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2003. IEEE CCECE 2003., (2003), 141-146.
Jin, Huang, et al., “Prototype implementation and evaluation of a multibank embedded memory architecture in programmable logic”, 2003 IEEE Pacific RIM Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2003. PACRIM., (2003), 13-16.
Kane, M. H, et al., “Read Only Store Memory Extension”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM0000828450, (1975).
Kellog, Mark, “PC133: SDRAM Main Memory Performance Reaches New Heights”, IBM Microelectronics, (1999).
Keltcher, C. N, et al., “The AMD Opteron processor for multiprocessor servers”, IEEE Micro, 23(2), (2003), 66-76.
Kirihata, T., et al., “A 390-mm2, 16-bank, 1-Gb DDR SDRAM with hybrid bitline architecture”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 34(11), (Nov. 11, 1999), 1580-1588.
Kornaros, G., et al., “A Fully-Programmable Memory Management System Optimizing Queue Handling at Multi Gigabit Rates”, DAC '03 Proceedings of the 40th annual Design Automation Conference, (2003), 54-59.
Lee, J., et al., “A banked-promotion translation lookaside buffer system”, Journal of Systems Architecture, 47, (2002), 1065-1078.
Lee, J., et al., “An on-chip cache compression technique to reduce decompression overhead and design complexity”, Journal of Systems Architecture, 46, (2000), 1365-1382.
Lin, Wei-Fen, et al., “Designing a modern memory hierarchy with hardware prefetching”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 50(1), (2001), 1202-1218.
Luthra, M., et al., “Interface Synthesis Using Memory Mapping for an FPGA Platform”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer Design, (2003), 6 pgs.
Matick, R. E, “Logic and Decoder Arrangement for Controlling SpillWrap Boundaries of a Bit-Addressable Memory Decoder”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (1984).
Matick, R. E, “Read-Select Capability for Static Random-Access Memory”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (1985), 6640-6642.
Meyers, R. F, “Use of Partially Good Memory Chips”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000066246D, (1979).
Murdocca, Miles J, et al., “”, Principles of Computer Architecture, (2000), 249-251.
Murdocca, Miles J., “”, Principles of Computer Architecture, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, (2000), 243-252.
Ofek, H., et al., “Partial Two Way Mapping Technique”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 1969, (1969), 429-430.
Paldan, D., “Programmable Memory Address Decoding for Microprocessor Memory Device”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000005486D, (1983).
Plotnick, N., “Shuffle Your Chips for Better Performance”, PC Week, (1998), 90.
Schubert, K. D, et al., “Accelerating system integration by enhancing hardware, firmware, and co-simulation,”, IBM J. Res. & Dev, 48(34), (May/Jul. 2004), 569-581.
Skelton, M. H, “Program Controlled Paging Scheme for Memory Expansion”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000050954D, (1982).
Slegel, T. J, et al., “IBM's S390 G5 Microprocessor Design”, IEEE Micro, 19(2), (1999), 12-23.
Smith, B. A, “Chip Select Decoder Circuit”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000063400D, (1985).
Stelzer, K. C, “Planar Memory Boundary Registers with Remap Feature”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (1993).
Sunaga, T., et al., “An Enable Signal Circuit for Multiple Small Banks”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000123375D, (1998).
Sunaga, T., et al., “Continuos Ras Access Method in Multiple-bank Dram Chip”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000123375D, (1998).
Toal, C., et al., “A 32-Bit SoPC Implementation of a P5”, Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications, (2003), 1530-1346.
Tudruj, M., et al., “Dynamically reconfigurable heterogeneous multi-processor systems with transputer-controlled communication”, Journal of Systems Architecture, 43, (1997), 27-32.
Yao, Y. L, “High Density Memory Selection Circuit”, IP.com, IP.com No. IPCOM000078218D, (1972).
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Accelerated Examination Support Document filed Aug. 21, 2013”, 59 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, Pre-Examination Search Document filed Aug. 21, 2013”, 15 pgs.
“168 Pin Registered SDRAM DIMM Family”, JEDeC Standard No. 21-6 4.5.7 Release 8r11, (Oct. 2001), 1-24.
“278 Pin Buffered SDRAM DIMM Family”, JEDEC Standard No. 21-C 4.6.1 Release 7, (Jun. 1997), 1-8.
“4.20.2—168 Pin, PC133 SDRAM Registered DIMM Design Specification”, JEDEC Standard No. 21-C, Revision 1.4, (Feb. 2002), 75 pgs.
“ACEX 1K Programmable Logic Device Family v. 3.4”, ALTERA Corporation Data Sheet, (May 2003), 86 pgs.
“Appendix E: Specific PD's for Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM)”, JEDEC Standard No. 21-C 4.1.2.5 Release 7re8-2r11, (May 2003), 1-25.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Substitute Amendment dated Jul. 6, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Response filed Aug. 5, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2014”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Appeal Brief and Amendment filed Oct. 2, 2013”, 206 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Cross Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester mailed Oct. 1, 2013”, 39 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011”, 34 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2012”, 38 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2014”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Owner Respondent's Brief in Cross Appeal dated Nov. 1, 2013”, 183 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Responded Brief of Third Party Requester filed Nov. 1, 2013”, 85 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Respondent Brief of third Party Requester mailed Nov. 4, 2013”, 165 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Response filed Jul. 6, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011”, 201 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Response filed Dec. 3, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2012”, 72 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Right of Appeals Notice mailed Jun. 21, 2013”, 49 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Third Party Requester Comments mailed Oct. 27, 2011 after Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011”, 251 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution history from Jun. 4, 2014 to Oct. 1, 2014”, 877 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, Partial Prosecution History from Oct. 10, 2013 to Sep. 5, 2014”, 334 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, Partial Prosecution history Other Documents from Nov. 16, 2011 to Sep. 26, 2013”, 498 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2014”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Petition mailed Sep. 18, 2014 in Response to Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2014”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Response filed May 29, 2014”, 68 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Response filed Oct. 2, 2014 to Petition filed Sep. 18, 2014”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Third Party Requesters Comments Following Action Closing Prosecution dated Jul. 1, 2014”, 154 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Third Party Requesters' Comments Following Action Closing Prosecution Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.951 filed Jun. 30, 2014”, 21 pgs.
“Micron, DDR SDRAM DIMM Module: MT16VDDT3264A—256 MB; MT16DDT646A—512 MB”, Data Sheet, Micron Technology, Inc., (2002), 26 pgs.
“Singleton”, Definition, Whatls.com, [Online] Retrieved From Internet: <http://whatls.techtarget.com/definition/singleton>, (Sep. 2005).
“Using SDRAM in Intel® 430TX PCIset Embedded Designs”, Application Note, Intel Corporation, (Jul. 1998).
Gregg, John R, “Ones and Zeros, Understanding Boolean Algebra, Digital Circuits, and the Logic of Sets”, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (1998), 59-63.
Joshi, K. D, “Foundation of Discrete Mathematics”, New Age International Limited Publishers, (1989), 71-72.
McCluskey, Edward J, “”, Logic Design Principles with Emphasis on Testable Semicustom Circuits, Prentice Hall, (1986), 104-107 & 119-120.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2014, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution history from Oct. 1, 2014 to Jan. 14, 2015”, 210 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Information Disclosure Statement filed Aug. 17, 2017”, 110 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Information Disclosure Statement filed Aug. 17, 2017”, 108 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95,001,758, Information Disclosure Statement filed Aug. 17, 2017”, 110 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Appeal Decision mailed Nov. 14, 2016”, 34 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Feb. 25, 2016”, 4 pgs.
“Corrected Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3, including Exhibit A”, U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc., and Diablo Technologies, Inc.,, (Aug. 27, 2014), 28 pgs.
“Decision Under 37 CFR 41.77(f)—U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758”, 32.
“Intel 6400/6402 Advanced Memory”, Datasheet, Reference No. 313072-002, (Oct. 2006), 250 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IP,R2015-01020”, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150, (Apr. 7, 2015), 66 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No, lPR2014-00882, Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150”, (Dec. 14, 2015), 51 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-00883, Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,081,536”, (Dec. 14, 2015), 46 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01011, Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150”, (Dec. 14, 2015), 46 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01020, Decision to Institute Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150”, (Oct. 8, 2015), 19 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01020, Exhibit 1002 to Petition for Inter Partes Review”, Declaration of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan, (Apr. 7, 2015), 222 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01020, Exhibit 1023 to Petition for Inter Partes Review”, Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan, (Apr. 7, 2015), 3 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01020, Exhibit 1025 to Petition for Inter Partes Review, ”operational“”, The Pocket Oxford American Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press, 2002, (Apr. 7, 2015), 4 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01021, Corrected Exhibit 1002 to Petition for Inter Panes Review”, “Declaration of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan”, (Apr. 22, 2015), 189 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No, IPR2014-01021, Decision to Institute Inter Panes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,081,536”, (Oct. 8, 2015), 19 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2014-01021, Exhibit 1026 to Petition for Inter Partes Review”, curriculum vitae of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan, (Apr. 7, 2015), 3 pgs.
“Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2015-01021, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,081,536”, (Apr. 7, 2015), 64 pgs.
“Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision on Appeal for Reexamination Control Nos. 95/000,546 and 95/000,577”, (Feb. 25, 2015), 25 pgs.
“Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision on Request for Rehearing for Reexamination Control Nos. 95/000,546 and 95/000,577”, (Aug. 25, 2015), 5 pgs.
Jacob, Bruce, et al., “Chapter 9: Dram System Signaling and Timing”, Memory Systems Cache, DRAM, Disk, Elsevier, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (2008), 377-518.
JEDEC, “JEDEC Standard Double Data Rate (DOR) SDRAM Specification”, JESD79, (Jun. 1, 2000).
Smith, Van, “Kenton Q&A.”, Van's Hardware, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.vanshardware.com.>, (Dec. 3, 2001), 4 pgs.
Takai, Yasuhiro, “250 Mbyte/s Synchronous DRAM Using a 3-Stage-Pipelined Architecture”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 29(4), (Apr. 1994), 426-431.
Weste, Neil H.E, et al., “4.2: Delay Estimation”, CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and System Persepective, 3rd Edition, Pearson Addison Wesley, (2005), Cover, Title page, Copyright page, 159.
Weste, Neil H.E, et al., “Chapter 4: Delay”, CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and System Persepective, 4th Edition, Pearson, Addison-Wesley, (2011), Cover, Title page, Copyright page, 142.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Oct. 20, 2010 to Jul. 29, 2011), 1687 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Aug. 29, 2011 to Aug. 29, 2011), 1191 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Oct. 4, 2011 to Dec. 27, 2012), 1053 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Jan. 14, 2013 to Jun. 10, 2013), 427 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Oct. 21, 2010 to Nov. 30, 2011), 1160 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Jan. 14, 2012 to Jan. 14, 2013), 948 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Feb. 13, 2013 to Feb. 13, 2013), 384 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Feb. 13, 2013 to Jun. 10, 2013), 341 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Apr. 20, 2010 to Jul. 29, 2011), 822 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Jul. 29, 2011 to Feb. 10, 2012), 812 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Feb. 13, 2012 to Dec. 27, 2012), 777 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution History”, (from Jan. 14, 2013 to Jun. 10, 2013), 511 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399 Prosecution History”, From Sep. 15, 2012 to Jul. 12, 2013, 609 pgs.
“Decoupling Capacitor Calculation for a DDR Memory Channel”, Micron, Technical Note, (2004), 3 pgs.
“HP Printer Memory Explained”, The ZonkPage. Last Updated Jan. 21, 2004. Accessed Jun. 28, 2013 , [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://warshaft.com/hpmem.htm>, 7 pgs.
“Hynix HYMD512G726(L)8-K/H/L”, Registered DDR SDRAM DIMM, 128Mx72 bits Product Description, Rev. 0.1, (May 2002), 16 pgs.
“PC133 SDRAM Registered DIMM”, Design Specification, Rev 1.1, (Aug. 1999), 62 pgs.
“Synchronous DRAM Module MT18LSDT472”, Micron Technology Inc., (1998), 17 pgs.
“TM2SR72EPN 2097152 by 72-Bit, TM4SRT2EPN 4194304 by 72-Bit, Synchronous Dynamic RAM Modules”, Texas Instruments, (1997), 15 pgs.
“Understanding DRAM Operation”, IBM, Application Note, (Dec. 1996), 10 pgs.
“3-to-1 VMs-per-Server Ratio Improvement with HyperCloudtm Memory”, © 2010 Netlist, Inc., (2010), 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Amendment and Response filed Mar. 13, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2012”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Amendment and Response filed Jun. 21, 2012 to Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2012”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 13, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,179, Supplemental Amendment filed Jun. 27, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/912,623, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2011”, 29 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,042, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,042, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 16, 2014”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/287,042, Response filed Apr. 2, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,850, Amendment filed Jan. 13, 2014 in response to Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2013”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,850, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2013”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,850, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2014”, dated Mar. 26, 2014.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Amendment filed Jan. 7, 2015 in response to Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2014”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2014”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Supplemental Response filed Jan. 7, 2015”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Amendment filed Mar. 31, 2014 in response to Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2013”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,344, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2013”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,243, Amendment Response filed May 2, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,243, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,243, Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2014”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,546, Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Aug. 9, 2010”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Decision on Appeal dated Feb. 25, 2015”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Partial Prosecution History from Apr. 21, 2014 to Oct. 15, 2014”, 34 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Proceedings mailed on Feb. 6, 2015 of Oral Hearing held Nov. 19, 2014”, 50 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Requester's Comments under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 1.947 filed Feb. 23, 2012”, 30 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Right of Appeal Notice dated Jun. 18, 2014”, 90 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Appellant's Brief filed Sep. 16, 2014”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Appellant's Brief filed Sep. 16, 2014”, (Appendix A), 32 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Declaration of Jason K. Yu in Support of Third Party Requester Smart Modular Technologies (WWH) Inc.;s Petition Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1,181 dated Mar. 29, 2012 and filed Sep. 16, 2014”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Declaration of Nader Bagherzadeh, Ph.D. Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 and MPEP §2618(II) dated Feb. 10, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Declaration of Nader Bagherzadeh, Ph.D. Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 and MPEP §2618(11) dated Feb. 13, 2013”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Respondent Brief of Third Party Requester Smart Modular Technologies (WWH) Inc. pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §. 41.68 filed Oct. 30, 2014”, 30 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, Third Party Requester Smart Modular Technologies (WWH) Inc.'s Rebuttal Brief filed Feb. 9, 2015”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Declaration of Nader Bagherzadeh, Ph.D, Under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 and MPEP §2618(II) dated Aug. 25, 2011”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History from Jan. 14, 2015 to May 7, 2015”, 338 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History from Aug. 13, 2013 to Jul. 30, 2014”, 502 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History from Sep. 16, 2014 to Sep. 30, 2014”, 502 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History from Oct. 1, 2014 to Oct. 17, 2014”, 514 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Partial Prosecution History from Oct. 30, 2014 to Oct. 31, 2014”, 531 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,337, Decision on Appeal dated Jan. 16, 2014”, 30 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,337, Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Aug. 27, 2010”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,337, Right of Appeal Notice dated Jun. 22, 2012”, 34 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Appeal Brief under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 41.67 filed Sep. 30, 2014”, 36 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Appeal Brief under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 41.67 filed Sep. 30, 2014”, (Appendix A), 110 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Appellant Inphi's Rebuttal Brief under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 41.71, filed Feb. 17, 2015”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Partial Prosecution history from Feb. 9, 2015 to May 7, 2015”, 360 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,381, Decision on Appeal mailed Jan. 16, 2014”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,381, Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Sep. 8, 2010”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,381, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Feb. 7, 2012”, 30 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2011”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Nov. 16, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, Partial Prosecution History from Oct. 14, 2014 to May 1, 2015”, 150 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Edward P. Sayre Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.132 filed May 1, 2015”, 33 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2012”, 73 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Dec. 7, 2012”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Petition Decision mailed Apr. 2, 2015”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Petition under 37 C.F.R. Secs. 1.181 & 1.183 to Enter Third Party Requester's Replacement Comments filed May 1, 2015”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Response filed Mar. 26, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2012”, 50 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399, Third Party Requester's Comments Following Action Closing Prosecution mailed May 1, 2015”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Appellant's Rebutall Brief in Cross Appeal filed Feb. 18, 2015”, 48 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Christopher Lopes dated Jul. 5, 2011 filed Oct. 17, 2014”, 61 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Dr. Carl Sechen under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 1.132 dated Jul. 5, 2011 and filed Oct. 1, 2014”, 37 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Carl Sechen under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 dated Jan. 13, 2013 and filed Oct. 17, 2014”, 29 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,546 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Third Party Requester Smart Modular Technologies (WWH) Inc.'s Opposition to Request for Rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 41.79”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,546 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Decision on Appeal mailed Feb. 25, 2015”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,546 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Request for Rehearing under 37 C.F.R. §. 41.79 filed Mar. 26, 2015”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,546 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,577, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Jun. 21, 2013”, 40 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Google, Inc. Pursuant to Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 134(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.67”, 68 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Dr. Christoforos Kozyrakis dated Oct. 21, 2010”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Dr. Christoforos Kozyrakis dated Feb. 13, 2013”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Dr. Christoforos Kozyrakis dated Feb. 23, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Dr. Christoforos Kozyrakis dated Aug. 28, 2011”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Declaration of Hyun Lee, Ph.D. dated Jul. 8, 2011”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, Rebuttal Brief of Third Party Requester Google, Inc. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Sec. 41.71 ffiled Feb. 17, 2015.”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Appellant's Brief in Cross Appeal filed Sep. 30, 2014”, 66 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Respondent's Brief to Requester 3'S Appeal filed Oct. 30, 2014”, 35 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Respondent's Brief to Requester 1'S Appeal filed Oct. 30, 2014”, 32 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Respondent's Brief to Requester 2'S Appeal filed Oct. 17, 2014”, 26 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,399, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, and U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579, Appellant's Brief in Cross Appeal filed Oct. 30, 2014”, 210 pgs.
“Cirrascale Qualifies HyperCloud Memory on Blade Server”, Cirrascale, [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.cirrascale.corn/press/PR042811.pdf, (Apr. 28, 2011), 3 pgs.
“Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150 dated Jul. 8, 2014 filed Jul. 8, 2014”, Diablo Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-00882, 67 pgs.
“Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,150 filed Jul. 8, 2014”, Diablo Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-01011, 68 pgs.
“Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,081,536 filed Jul. 8, 2014”, Diablo Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-00883, 68 pgs.
“Diablo Technologies, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 41 pgs.
“Exhibit 1007—Declaration of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan filed Jun. 22, 2014”, DiabloTechnologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-00882, 392 pgs.
“Exhibit 1007—Declaration of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan filed Jun. 22, 2014”, Diablo Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-01011, 392 pgs.
“Exhibit 1011—Declaration of Dr. Srinivasan Jagannathan filed Jun. 21, 2014”, Diablo Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case: IPR2014-00883, 266 pgs.
“Exhibit H to Diablo Technologies, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions dated Jun. 6, 2014”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 3 pgs.
“Exhibit H to Smart Smart Storage System, Inc.'s Exhibit H to Invalidity Contentions dated Jun. 6, 2014”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 2 pgs.
“Exhibits F.1 to F.5 to Diablo Technologies, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, (Jun. 6, 2014), 154 pgs.
“Exhibits F.1 to F.5 to Smart Smart Storage System, Inc., 's to Invalidity Contentions dated Jun. 6, 2014”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 178 pgs.
“Exhibits G.1 to G.6 to Diablo Technologies, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions dated Jun. 6, 2014”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems. Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 79 pgs.
“Exhibits G.1 to G.6 to Smart Storage Systems, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 137 pgs.
“HyperCloud is the New Buzzword: Stock Up 45%”, World Market Media, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://wwe.worldmarketmedia.com/779/section.aspx/505/post/nlst-netlist-inc-nasdaq-last-193-39m-marketcap>, (Nov. 12, 2009), 2 pgs.
“HyperCloud™ 8GB & 16GB DDR3 RDIMMs”, © 2010 Netlist, Inc., (2010), 3 pgs.
“HyperCioudtm Memory Accelerates Simulation Performance 21%”, © 2010 Netlist, Inc., (2010), 1-4.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/059209, International Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/059209, Written Opinion dated Jan. 30, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-520662, Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2014”, (w/ English Translation), 7 pgs.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C, 4.1.2.5—Appendix E: Specific PD's for Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM)”, (May 2003), 25 pgs.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C, 4.5.7—168 Pin Registered SDRAMM DIMM Family”, (Oct. 2001), 24 pgs.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C, 4,6.1—Pin Buffered SDRAM DIMM Family”, (Jun. 1997), 8 pgs.
“JEDEC Standard No. 21-C, DDR SDRAM Registered DIMM Design Specification”, PC2100 and PC1600 DDR SDRAM Registered DIMM, (Jan. 2002), 81 pgs.
“Netlist Accelerates MSC Software Simulation Performance”, Desktop Engineering, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.deskeng.com/articles/aaayta.htm>, (Oct. 11, 2010), 2 pgs.
“Red Bull Racing Revs Up Formula 1 Race Car Simulations with Netlist's Hypercloud Memory”, Breitbart, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20101215.LA17830&show_article=1>, (Dec. 15, 2010), 2 pgs.
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,532,537”, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,381, filed Jun. 9, 2010, 241 pgs.
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,864,627”, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, 814 pgs.
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 8,250,295”, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,758, filed Sep. 14, 2011, 814 pgs.
“Smart Storage Systems, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions filed Jun. 6, 2014”, Netlist, Inc. v. Smart Storage Systems, Inc. and Diablo Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court Northern District of California, Case No. 4:13-CV-05889-YGR, 85 pgs.
“Supermicro Qualifies Netlist's Hypercloud Memory on High-Density Servers”, © 2008 SYS-CON Media Inc., [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/node/1351166/print>, (2008), 2 pgs.
“Using Two Chip Selects to Enable Quad Rank”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, (Dec. 17, 2005), 2 pgs.
“Wall Street News Alert: Trade Alert: NLST, FRPT”, Financial Tech Spotlight, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://financial.tmcnet.com//human-capital-management/news/2010/06/14/4844836.htm>, (Jun. 14, 2010), 4 pgs.
“World's First Virtual Rank Memory for Data Centers”, ZNet India [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://news.znetindia.com/worlds-first-virtual-rank-memory-for-data-centers.html, (Nov. 12, 2009). 1 pg.
Barnard, Patrick, “Netlist Demonstrating its Innovative Hypercloud Memory Solution at INTEROP”, infoTECH Spotlight, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://it.tmcnet.com/topics/it/articles/110529-netlist-demonstrating-its-innovative-hypercloud-memory-solution-interop.htm>, (Oct. 21, 2010), 3 pgs.
Bell, Chris, et al., “Mastering EDA Environments with High Performance Memory Technology”, Deopli Corporation White Paper, (2012), 1-6.
Berlind, Davud, “Interop in Advance: Hypercloud Claims to Overcome Server's Natural RAM Limits”, Information Week, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/virtual/227701137>, (Oct. 11, 2010), 5 pgs.
David, Howard, et al., “Fully Buffered Dimm (FB-DIMM) Design Considerations”, Intel Developer Forum, (Feb. 18, 2000), 1-36.
Fratto, Mike, “Netlist Demonstrates New HyperCloud Memory Modules at Supercomputing 09”, Network Computing, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.networkcomputing.com/servers-storage/netlist-demonstrates-new-hypercloud-memory-modules-at-supercomputing-09.php, (Nov. 16, 2009), 2 pgs.
Jacob, Bruce L., “'Synchronous DRAM Architectures, Organizations, arid Alternative Technologies”, University of Maryland, (Dec, 10, 2002), 22 pgs.
Jandhyala, Sri, et al., “Design-For-Test Analysis of a Buffered SDRAM DIMM”, Proceedings of International Workshop on Memory Technology, Design and Testing, Singapore, Aug. 13-14, 1996, (1996), 15 pgs.
Marshall, David, “Netlist's HyperCloud Memory Approved for MDS Micro's Cloud Matrix”, VMblog.com, [online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http: //vmblog.com/archive/2010/11/15/netlist-s-hypercloud-memory-approved-for-mds-micro-s-cloud-matrix.aspx, (Nov. 15, 2010), 5 pgs.
Montgomery, Ashley, “Netlist Inc. (NASDAQ: NLST) $74M (MarketCap) Trading at +20%”, World Market Media, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.worldmarketmedia.com/779/section.aspx/1829/netlist-inc-nasdaq-nlst-74m-marketcap-trading-at-20>, (Jun. 14, 2010), 2 pgs.
Morgan, Timothy P., “Netlist Goes Virtual and Dense with Server Memory”, The Register, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.theregisterco.uk/2009/11/11/netlist_hypercloud_memory/>, (Nov. 11, 2009), 2 pgs.
Morgan, Timothy P., “Netlist's Hypercloud Gets Wall Street's Blessing”, The Register, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/23/netlist_public_float/, (Mar. 23, 2010), 2 pgs.
Mutnury, Bhyrav, et al., “Analysis of Fully Buffered DIMM Interface in High-Speed Server Applications”, IEEE Electronic Components and Technology Conference, (2006).
Pop, Sebastian, “First-Ever I6GB, 2 Virtual Rank Memory Module Developed by Netlist”, Softpedia(r), [onine]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://news.softpedia.com/news/First-Ever-16GB-2-Virtual-Rank-Memory-Module-Developed-by-Netlist-126828.shtml>, (Nov. 12, 2009), 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,337, filed Aug. 21, 2013, Multi-Rank Memory Module That Emulates a Memory Module Having a Different Number of Ranks.
“”, Portion of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,289,386, corresponding to Reexam Application No. 95/000,577.
“”, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination; Reexam App. No. 95/000,577 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,289,386 filed Oct. 20, 2010.
“”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/142,989, filed Dec. 7, 2006 and its entire prosecution history.
“”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/335,875, filed Jan. 19, 2006; Owned by Netlist, Inc.
“”, Deposition of William Hoffman, (May 18, 2010), 9 pgs.
“”, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Ed., (2000).
“”, New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd. Edition, (2005), 1193.
“”, 20110125966 File History, (Aug. 12, 2011), 296 pgs.
“”, Google's Invalidity Contentions and exhibits 6 and 14, (Jul. 16, 2010), 59 pgs.
“”, MPC8260 SDRAM Support, Freescale Semiconductor, Appl. Note, Doc. No. AN2165/D, Rev. 1, (Oct. 2006).
“”, DM74LS138 ⋅ DM74LS139, Decoder/Demultiplexer, Fairchild Semiconductor Corp., Aug. 1986, Revised Mar. 2000 (GNET001928-1935), (Aug 1986).
“§2173.05(g)”, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, (Jul. 2008), 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Examiner's Interview Summary dated Jan. 12, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 5, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Jul. 13, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Feb. 2, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Response filed Jul. 3, 2012 to Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 5, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,151, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 12, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 7, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,578, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,579 and U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,339 (Merged) Partial Prosecution History”, (from Apr. 15, 2011 to Feb. 2, 2012), 1719 pgs.
“Bank Address Definition”, JEDEC Dictionary of Terms for Solid State Technology, 5th Edition, (2009), 14.
“Exhibit A”, Excerpts from the deposition transcript of Richard Turley, (May 13, 2010), 13 pgs.
“PACER Document 45—Claim Construction Statement”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jun. 25, 2010), 5 pgs.
“PACER Document 45—Exhibit B to Joint Claim Construction”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jun. 25, 2010), 23 pgs.
“PACER Document 45 Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jun. 25, 2010), 2 pgs.
“PACER Document 48—Claim Construction Statement”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jul. 16, 2010), 29 pgs.
“PACER Document 48—Declaration of Steven R. Hansen in Support of Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBa Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jul. 16, 2010), 3 pgs.
“PACER Document 48—Exhibit A to Decl. of Steven R. Hansen”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jul. 16, 2010), 41 pgs.
“PACER Document 48—Exhibits B-G to Decl. of Steven R. Hansen”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jul. 16, 2010), 89 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Affidavit”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 2 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Claim Construction Statement”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 27 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Exhibit A”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 13 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Exhibit B”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 41 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Exhibit C”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 6 pgs.
“PACER Document 49—Exhibit D”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 4, 2010), 19 pgs.
“PACER Document 50—Reply Memorandum”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Aug. 16, 2010), 17 pgs.
“PACER Document 63—Declaration in Support”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Nov. 5, 2010), 3 pgs.
“PACER Document 68—Order”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jan. 26, 2011), 2 pgs.
“PACER Document 69—Patent/Trademark Copy”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jan. 27, 2011), 3 pgs.
“Pacer Document 70—Status Report”, 4:09-cv-05718-SBA Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., (Jul. 25, 2011), 13 pgs.
“WSI Aims Programmable MCU Peripherals At DSPs”, Electronic Buyer's News, n. 927, (1994), 39.
Vogt, P., “Fully Buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) Server Memory Architecture:”, Intel Developer Forum, (Feb. 18, 2004), 33 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,694, filed Aug. 7, 2012, Multi-Rank Memory Module That Emulates a Memory Module Having a Different Number of Ranks.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,399 U.S. Pat. No. 8,250,295, filed Sep. 15, 2012, Multi-Rank Memory Module That Emulates a Memory Module Having a Different Number of Ranks.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110125966 A1 May 2011 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10752151 Jan 2004 US
Child 12902073 US