The invention relates generally to contact centers and particularly to the servicing of customers by a contact center.
Contact centers, such as Automatic Call Distribution or ACD systems, are employed by many enterprises to service customer contacts. A typical contact center includes a switch and/or server to receive and route incoming packet-switched and/or circuit-switched contacts and one or more resources, such as human agents and automated resources (e.g., Interactive Voice Response (IVR) units), to service the incoming contacts. Contact centers distribute contacts, whether inbound or outbound, for servicing to any suitable resource according to predefined criteria. In many existing systems, the criteria for servicing the contact from the moment that the contact center becomes aware of the contact until the contact is connected to an agent are customer-specifiable (i.e., programmable by the operator of the contact center), via a capability called vectoring. Normally in present-day ACDs when the ACD system's controller detects that an agent has become available to handle a contact, the controller identifies all predefined contact-handling skills of the agent (usually in some order of priority) and delivers to the agent the highest-priority oldest contact that matches the agent's highest-priority skill. Generally, the only condition that results in a contact not being delivered to an available agent is that there are no contacts waiting to be handled.
A constant challenge in contact centers is maintaining customer satisfaction and therefore maintaining goodwill. For example, though more efficient contact routing algorithms are in use customers are frequently frustrated by unexpectedly long wait times in queue, and infrequent notifications, at best, of their queue positions or wait times until they are serviced. Customers therefore have no idea how long they will need to stay on the line until they are assigned to an agent for servicing. To make matters even worse, waiting customers are “held captive” by the contact center. They are prevented from receiving another call or attending to matters requiring both hands because of the fear of their call arriving at the head of the queue while they are absent, thereby causing them to lose not only their queue position but also the call itself. The agent will often hang up the phone based on the erroneous belief that the call is a prank. The customer would then need to redial the contact center and start all over again at the tail of the queue.
One attempt to address this problem it to provide for agent call back at the customer's request. The contact center places the call back request in a queue, and the contact center calls the customer back when the request reaches the head of the queue. The problem with this approach is that the customer has only “good faith” for a call back. Worse, the customer often doesn't know when he or she will be called back as he or she is given no information about his or her position in queue as a function of time. When the customer is on hold, he or she knows that the call will eventually be answered and, in some systems, may receive periodic notifications of his or her queue status. For example, some e-commerce centers provide relatively up-to-date wait-time information on a periodically refreshed Web page. Call back systems provide no such feed back.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention is directed to various customer notifiers in contact center architectures.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a method for servicing customer contacts is provided that includes the steps of:
In another embodiment, a method for servicing a customer contact includes the steps of:
The above embodiments permit a customer to attend to other activities, even at a distance from his or her communication device. The activities include, for example, housework, answering an incoming call, attending to children's needs, going to the bathroom, all without losing the customer's place in queue. An agent available notification, for example, is played over the communication device's internal and/or external speaker and/or displayed on a Graphical User Interface or GUI to announce that an agent is ready or soon to be ready to service the contact. The customer is provided with enough time to respond before the contact center requeues or terminates the contact.
In yet another embodiment, a method for servicing customer contacts includes the steps of:
This embodiment can offer queue status information to customers on demand and/or at customer-configured, defined intervals or frequency. The queue status information can include one or more selected or predetermined current metrics, such as the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is assigned to an agent for servicing, the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is at a designated queue position the advance rate of contacts in the queue, the current queue position of the customer's contact, current rate at which the queue is being serviced (e.g., “we are currently servicing two queue positions every three minutes.”), and current state of requeuing (e.g., “You have been requeued “x” times for not responding to an agent. You will only be requeued “y” more times before being dropped from the queue.”). The customer can request queue status information as frequently as the customer desires. This permits the customer to make an informed decision between dropping or terminating the contact in favor of other activities or waiting for servicing.
The various embodiments can provide individually and collectively a number of contact center benefits. For example, customer satisfaction levels can be increased substantially while contact abandonment rates can be dramatically decreased.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
As used herein, “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The invention will be illustrated below in conjunction with an exemplary communication system. Although well suited for use with, e.g., a system having an ACD or other similar contact processing switch, the invention is not limited to use with any particular type of communication system switch or configuration of system elements. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosed techniques may be used in any communication application in which it is desirable to provide improved contact processing.
The term “switch” or “server” as used herein should be understood to include a PBX, an ACD, an enterprise switch, or other type of communications system switch or server, as well as other types of processor-based communication control devices such as media servers, computers, adjuncts, etc.
Referring to
The switch 130 and/or server 110 can be any architecture for directing contacts to one or more communication devices. Illustratively, the switch and/or server can be a modified form of the subscriber-premises equipment disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,192,122; 6,173,053; 6,163,607; 5,982,873; 5,905,793; 5,828,747; and 5,206,903, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference; Avaya Inc.'s Definity™ Private-Branch Exchange (PBX)-based ACD system; MultiVantage™ PBX, CRM Central 2000 Server™, Communication Manager™, S8300™ media server, and/or Avaya Interaction Center™. Typically, the switch/server is a stored-program-controlled system that conventionally includes interfaces to external communication links, a communications switching fabric, service circuits (e.g., tone generators, announcement circuits, etc.), memory for storing control programs and data, and a processor (i.e., a computer) for executing the stored control programs to control the interfaces and the fabric and to provide automatic contact-distribution functionality. The switch and/or server typically include a network interface card (not shown) to provide services to the serviced communication devices. Other types of known switches and servers are well known in the art and therefore not described in detail herein.
Referring to
Referring to
The first communication devices 134-1, . . . 134-N are packet-switched while the second communication devices 138-1, . . . 138-M are circuit-switched. The packet-switched communication devices can use a variety of interactive real time communication applications, such as Voice over IP or VoIP, instant messaging, chat, text messaging, and the like. The packet-switched devices typically include wired and wireless IP hardphones such as the Avaya Inc.'s 4600 Series IP Phones™, IP softphones such as Avaya Inc.'s IP Softphone™, Personal Digital Assistants or PDAs, Personal Computers or PCs, laptops, packet-based H.320 video phones and conferencing units, packet-based voice messaging and response units, and packet-based traditional computer telephony adjuncts. The second communication devices can be any live voice communication devices and generally include Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) wired and wireless telephones, PDAs, H.320 video phones and conferencing units, voice messaging and response units, and traditional computer telephony adjuncts.
It should be noted that the invention does not require any particular type of information transport medium between switch or server and first and second communication devices, i.e., the invention may be implemented with any desired type of transport medium as well as combinations of different types of transport channels.
The packet-switched network 162 can be any data and/or distributed processing network, such as the Internet. The network 162 typically includes proxies (not shown), registrars (not shown), and routers (not shown) for managing packet flows.
The packet-switched network 162 is in communication with an external first communication device 174 via a gateway 178, and the circuit-switched network 154 with an external second communication device 180. These communication devices are referred to as “external” or “customer communication devices” and are not directly supported as communication device endpoints by the switch or server. The communication devices 174 and 180 are thus external endpoints as opposed to the agent communication devices which are internal endpoints.
In a preferred configuration, the server 110, network 162, and first communication devices 134 are Session Initiation Protocol or SIP compatible and can include interfaces for various other protocols such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol or LDAP, H.248, H.323, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol or SMTP, IMAP4, ISDN, E1/T1, and analog line or trunk.
It should be emphasized that the configuration of the switch, server, user communication devices, and other elements as shown in
As will be appreciated, the central server 110 is notified via LAN 142 of an incoming contact by the communications component (e.g., switch 130, fax server, email server, web server, and/or other server) receiving the incoming contact. The incoming contact is held by the receiving communications component until the server 110 forwards instructions to the component to forward or route the contact to a specific contact center resource, such as the IVR unit 122, the voice mail server 118, and/or first or second communication device 134, 138 associated with a selected agent. The server 110 distributes and connects these contacts to communication devices of available agents based on the predetermined criteria noted above. When the central server 110 forwards a voice contact to an agent, the central server 110 also forwards customer-related information from databases 114 to the agent's computer work station for previewing and/or viewing (such as by a pop-up display) to permit the agent to better serve the customer. The agents process the contacts sent to them by the central server 110.
According to the invention, agent available and queue status notifier modules 250 and 254 are provided. The modules are stored either in the main memory or in a peripheral memory (e.g., disk, CD ROM, etc.) or some other computer-readable medium of the center 100.
The agent available notifier 250, when activated by a customer/contactor, notifies the activating customer when the customer's contact is at the head or near the head of a queue 208 so that the customer is not required to remain continuously on the communication device 174, 180 while his or her contact advances in the queue 208. By way of example, if the customer is active on a first call with the contact center waiting for servicing and receives an incoming (second) call announced by a “call waiting” tone(s) the customer can hit a selected key, such as the [flash] key, to place the first call with the contact center on hold and toggle over to and connect to the incoming second call. The first call with the contact center is “on hold” and continues to advance towards the head of the queue while the customer is active on the second call. When the first call advances to the head of the queue or another selected queue position and/or immediately before or when the first call is delivered to an agent for servicing, the notification is provided as one or more audible tones generated by the tone generators in the server 110 and transmitted over the customer communication line 200. The tone(s) are received by the device 174, 180 and played audibly over a speaker of the device. In other words, the customer hears not only the conversation in the second call but also the audible tones. The customer again hits the [flash] key after terminating the second call or to place the second call on hold while he or she converses with the agent assigned to service the first call. In another example, while the customer is active on the contact with the contact center and waiting for servicing by an agent the customer decides that he or she must put the communication device down to attend to an urgent personal matter, such as tending to a child, answering a door, removing food from an oven, going to the bathroom, etc. The customer activates the agent available notifier 250 and an external speaker, such as the external speaker on a speaker phone (i.e., the speaker external to the handset), and attends to the personal matter. When the contact advances to the head of the queue or another selected queue position and/or immediately before or when the first contact is delivered to an agent for servicing, the notification is provided as one or more audible tones generated by the tone generators in the server 110 and transmitted over the customer communication line 200. The tone(s) are received by the device 174, 180 and played audibly over the external speaker of the device so that the customer can hear the tones while he or she is located at a distance from the handset. When the customer hears the tones, the customer picks up the handset and converses with the servicing agent. In either example, the customer is able to attend to alternate activities without losing his or her place in the customer queue 208.
The queue status notifier 254, when activated by the customer, obtains and notifies the customer of current queue metrics for the queue position assigned to the customer's enqueued contact. The metrics can include any customer or agent queue-related information, such as the number of agents in the servicing agent queue 212, the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is assigned to an agent for servicing, the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is at a designated queue position such as the head of the queue (e.g., “your expected wait time is 25 minutes”), the advance rate of contacts in the corresponding customer queue 208 (e.g., “the average time per call is 5 minutes”), the current queue position of the customer's contact (e.g., “you are currently the 25th person in line”), current rate at which the queue is being serviced (e.g., “we are currently servicing two queue positions every three minutes.”), and current state of requeuing (e.g., “You have been requeued “x” times for not responding to an agent. You will only be requeued “y” more times before being dropped from the queue.”). For example, a customer dials into a contact center and is told that he or she is the 25th person in line. The customer waits on hold 10 minutes and has still not been serviced. The customer has no idea of where he or she is in line (or his or her queue position). The customer presses a selected key, such as the [#] key, to receive, from the notifier 254, on-demand status as to the customer's current (e.g., within a predetermined time of the key press) queue position and expected wait time. Alternatively, the customer's queue status could thereafter be announced every time it changes, either audibly or via the text capability of the communication device.
The operation of the agent available notifier 250 will now be discussed with reference to
In decision diamond 312, the contact center determines whether the customer selected the notification feature (or entered the next agent available notification mode) by transmitting a selected set of signals to the contact center. In one configuration, the set of signals is transmitted when the customer has pressed a selected key, which in the example message is [*2]. The key may be transmitted to the contact center from the customer communication device as a DTMF signal. Alternatively, another type of audible or text message may be transmitted. If the customer has not selected the notification mode, the notifier in decision diamond 352 determines whether an agent is available to service the contact. Decision diamond 352 is repeated at selected intervals until an agent is available. If the customer has selected the notification mode, the contact center, in step 314, returns a confirmation tone or message advising that the customer has entered the next agent available notification mode (or activated the next agent available notification feature).
In next decision diamond 316, the notifier 250 determines whether a selected agent is currently available and/or will be available within a selected period of time. When an agent is not currently available and/or will not be available within a selected period of time, the notifier 250 returns to and repeats decision diamond 316 at a selected time interval.
When an agent is currently available and/or will be available within a selected period of time, the notifier 250 proceeds to decision diamond 320 and determines whether the contact with the customer has been placed “on hold” by the customer. This can be determined, for instance, when DTMF signals are received corresponding to the [flash] key. The customer does this when the customer toggles to an incoming call using the call waiting feature of his or her communication device. In an instant message or chat session, the customer may send a text message indicating that he or she has minimized the window corresponding to the session.
When the contact has been placed “on hold”, the notifier, in step 324, provides the customer's communication device with one or more audible tones and/or graphical messages, which are in turn played over the speaker and/or displayed on a screen of the device to be heard or viewed by the customer. As noted, the tones are played over the other customer's listening channel in the contact between the communication device and the communication device of a third party. In one configuration, the audible tones are the same as the “call waiting” interrupt tones. At this juncture, a call classifier or other signal monitor, which has been assigned to the contact, determines whether and what type of audible and/or text signals are returned by the customer. In optional step 328, after the passage of a selected time (without detection of a voice signal from the customer) the notifier plays one or more notification requests (such as “We have an agent ready to serve you. Please provide a voice response so that we may proceed to connect you”) over the customer's listening channel of the contact between the contact center and communication device but not over the customer's listening channel between the communication device and the third party communication device.
In decision diamond 332, the notifier determines, from the assigned signal monitor, whether a voice and/or text response has been received from the customer within a predetermined time measured either from the transmission of the audible tone(s)/message(s) or customer notification requests. If no response has been received within a determined time, the notifier increments a queue counter i (which has been initialized to a value of “zero” the first time through the flow chart) by “one” and, in decision diamond 340, determines whether the value of the counter is equal to a selected value x. X is the maximum number of requeues permitted for a customer. If so, the contact with the customer is terminated in step 344. If not, the contact is requeued, or again placed at the tail of the customer queue 208, in step 348. The activation of the next agent available notification mode is not changed for the contact as it again moves through the queue. The notifier then returns to decision diamond 316.
If a response is received within a determined time, if the agent becomes available in decision diamond 352, or if the contact with the contact center is not on hold in decision diamond 320, the notifier proceeds to step 336. In step 336, the contact center notifies the agent that a contact is available for servicing and delivers the contact and related information to the agent's communication device for servicing. As will be appreciated, the customer related information can include customer identity, customer business history, customer information collected by the IVR 122, and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, the contact is delivered to the agent after step 324, and step 328 and decision diamond 332 are omitted. When the contact is delivered, the agent is notified that the customer may be “on hold”. The agent determines whether the customer has activated (or removed from hold) the contact with the contact center. The agent typically does this by announcing his or her presence on the line and waiting for a selected time for a response. If no response is received within the selected time, the agent assumes that the customer is still “on hold” and has decided not to respond to the audible tones or message played over the customer communication device. If the customer is still on hold, the agent can request, such as by pressing the [*3] keys, that the customer's contact be requeued. In response, decision diamond 340 and steps 348 or 344 (as appropriate) are performed. In either this alternative or the prior embodiment, when the customer is requeued an announcement would be provided notifying the customer that he or she has been requeued because the call was ready for servicing by an agent and he or she failed to respond to the agent available message or audible tone, as the case may be.
The operation of the queue status notifier 254 will now be discussed with reference to
In decision diamond 412, the contact center determines whether the contactor has selected the on-demand queue status notification option. If so, the notifier 254 in optional step 416 interacts with the customer to determine his or her configuration options for the notification. The customer, for example, may select a recurring frequency for automatic on-demand notifications and the status information to be provided in the notifications (e.g., select one or more of the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is assigned to an agent for servicing, the predicted and/or expected wait time until the customer is at a designated queue position such as the head of the queue, the advance rate of contacts in the corresponding customer queue 208, the current queue position of the customer's contact, current rate at which the queue is being serviced (e.g., “we are currently servicing two queue positions every three minutes.”), and current state of requeuing (e.g., “You have been requeued “x” times for not responding to an agent. You will only be requeued “y” more times before being dropped from the queue.”). The customer may select a fixed or variable frequency for queue status notifications to be provided. By way of illustration, a fixed frequency could be once every 10 minutes and a variable frequency could be every time the customer's queue position changes. This ability can permit different customers in the same customer queue 208 to receive queue update notifications at differing frequencies and/or containing different queue status information.
In step 420, the notifier 254 collects and provides the current queue status information to the customer. This can be done by audible and/or text messages.
In decision diamond 352, the contact center determines whether or not the agent has become available. If not, the notifier returns to and repeats step 420 at a selected time interval and/or when the customer next requests an on-demand queue status notification.
Returning again to decision diamond 412 when the contactor does not select the on-demand queue notification option, the contact center in step 428 provides the customer with the default signals, such as a one-time queue status information notification, music, advertisement messages, and the like. In decision diamond 352, the contact center determines whether an agent has become available. If not, the contact center returns to and repeats step 428 or decision diamond 352 as appropriate.
In decision diamond 352, when the agent becomes available, the contact center, in step 424, delivers the contact and related customer information to the agent's communication device for servicing.
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.
For example, the server and/or switch can be a software-controlled system including a processing unit (CPU), microprocessor, or other type of digital data processor executing software or an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) as well as various portions or combinations of such elements. The memory may be a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), or combinations of these and other types of electronic memory devices.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the invention are grouped together in one or more embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
Moreover, though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4163124 | Jolissaint | Jul 1979 | A |
4567323 | Lottes et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4737983 | Frauenthal et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4797911 | Szlam et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4894857 | Szlam et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5001710 | Gawrys et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5097528 | Gursahaney et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101425 | Darland | Mar 1992 | A |
5155761 | Hammond | Oct 1992 | A |
5164983 | Brown et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5206903 | Kohler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210789 | Jeffus et al. | May 1993 | A |
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278898 | Cambray et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291550 | Levy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299260 | Shaio | Mar 1994 | A |
5309513 | Rose | May 1994 | A |
5335268 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335269 | Steinlicht | Aug 1994 | A |
5390243 | Casselman et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436965 | Grossman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444774 | Friedes | Aug 1995 | A |
5469503 | Butensky et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469504 | Blaha | Nov 1995 | A |
5473773 | Aman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479497 | Kovarik | Dec 1995 | A |
5500795 | Powers et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504894 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506898 | Costantini et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530744 | Charalambous et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537470 | Lee | Jul 1996 | A |
5537542 | Eilert et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544232 | Baker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546452 | Andrews et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5592378 | Cameron et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592542 | Honda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594726 | Thompson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606361 | Davidsohn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611076 | Durflinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627884 | Williams et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642515 | Jones et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5684872 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5684964 | Powers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689698 | Jones et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703943 | Otto | Dec 1997 | A |
5713014 | Durflinger et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724092 | Davidsohn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740238 | Flockhart et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742675 | Kilander et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748468 | Notenboom et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749079 | Yong et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751707 | Voit et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752027 | Familiar | May 1998 | A |
5754639 | Flockhart et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754776 | Hales et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754841 | Carino, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5757904 | Anderson | May 1998 | A |
5790677 | Fox et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794250 | Carino, Jr. et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | MacNaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802282 | Hales et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818907 | Maloney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825869 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828747 | Fisher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838968 | Culbert | Nov 1998 | A |
5839117 | Cameron et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875437 | Atkins | Feb 1999 | A |
5880720 | Iwafune et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881238 | Aman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884032 | Bateman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889956 | Hauser et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897622 | Blinn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903641 | Tonisson | May 1999 | A |
5903877 | Berkowitz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905793 | Flockhart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915012 | Miloslavsky | Jun 1999 | A |
5926538 | Deryugin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930786 | Carino, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937051 | Hurd et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937402 | Pandilt | Aug 1999 | A |
5940496 | Gisby et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943416 | Gisby | Aug 1999 | A |
5948065 | Eilert et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960073 | Kikinis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963635 | Szlam et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963911 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970132 | Brady | Oct 1999 | A |
5974135 | Breneman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974462 | Aman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982873 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987117 | McNeil et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991392 | Miloslavsky | Nov 1999 | A |
5996013 | Delp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999963 | Bruno et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011844 | Uppaluru et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038293 | McNerney et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044144 | Becker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044205 | Reed et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044355 | Crockett et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049547 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052723 | Ginn | Apr 2000 | A |
6055308 | Miloslavsky et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064730 | Ginsberg | May 2000 | A |
6064731 | Flockhart et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084954 | Harless | Jul 2000 | A |
6088441 | Flockhart et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115462 | Servi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141328 | Nabkel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151571 | Pertrushin | Nov 2000 | A |
6154769 | Cherkasova et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163607 | Bogart et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173053 | Bogart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175564 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178441 | Elnozahy | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185292 | Miloslavsky | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192122 | Flockhart et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215865 | McCalmont | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226377 | Donaghue, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229819 | Darland et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230183 | Yocom et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233333 | Dezonmo | May 2001 | B1 |
6240417 | Eastwick | May 2001 | B1 |
6259969 | Tackett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263359 | Fong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272544 | Mullen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275806 | Pertrushin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275812 | Haq et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275991 | Erlin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278777 | Morley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292550 | Burritt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295353 | Flockhart et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6353810 | Petrushin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356632 | Foster et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366668 | Borst et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389028 | Bondarenko et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389132 | Price | May 2002 | B1 |
6389400 | Bushey et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424709 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426950 | Mistry | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427137 | Petrushin | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6430282 | Bannister et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434230 | Gabriel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449356 | Dezonno | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449358 | Anisimov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449646 | Sikora et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453038 | McFarlane et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463148 | Brady | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463346 | Flockhart et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463415 | St. John | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6480826 | Pertrushin | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490350 | McDuff et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6535600 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535601 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560330 | Gabriel | May 2003 | B2 |
6560649 | Mullen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560707 | Curtis et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563920 | Flockhart et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597685 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6614903 | Flockhart et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650748 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6694008 | Mukherji et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704409 | Dilip et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707903 | Burok et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714643 | Gargeya et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6754333 | Flockhart et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766013 | Flockhart et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766014 | Flockhart et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7130411 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010056349 | St. John | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002460 | Pertrushin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002464 | Petrushin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010587 | Pertrushin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020118816 | Flockhart et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020181692 | Flockhart et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194002 | Petrushin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123642 | Alvarado et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138080 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152212 | Burok et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174830 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177017 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177231 | Flockhart et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040203878 | Thomson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050198107 | Cuhls et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050260975 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070041557 | Chatterjee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 501 189 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 740 450 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 772 335 | May 1997 | EP |
0 855 826 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 863 651 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0829996 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0866407 | Sep 1998 | EP |
899673 | Mar 1999 | EP |
998108 | May 2000 | EP |
1091307 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1150236 | Oct 2001 | EP |
2 273 418 | Jun 1994 | GB |
2 290 192 | Dec 1995 | GB |
2143198 | Jan 1995 | WO |
2174762 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9607141 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9728635 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9856207 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahmed, Sarah, “A Scalable Byzantine Fault Tolerant Secure Domain Name System,” thesis submitted to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Jan. 22, 2001, 101 pages. |
Avaya, Inc., “Better Implementation of IP in Large Networks,” Avaya, Inc. 2002, 14 pages. |
Avaya, Inc., “Voice Over IP Via Virtual Private Networks: An Overview,” Avaya, Inc., Feb. 2001, 9 pages. |
Coles, Scott, “A Guide for Ensuring Service Quality in IP Voice Networks,” Avaya, Inc., 2002, pp. 1-17. |
E. Noth et al., “Research Issues for the Next Generation Spoken”: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bavarian Research Centre for Knowledge-Based Systems, at http://www5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/literature/psdir/1999/Noeth99:RIF.ps.gz, printed Feb. 10, 2003; 8 pages. |
John H.L. Hansen and Levent M. Arsian, Foreign Accent Classification Using Source Generator Based Prosodic Features, IEEE Proc. ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 836-839, Detroit USA (May 1995). |
L.F. Lamel and J.L. Gauvain, Language Identification Using Phone-Based Acoustic Likelihood, ICASSP-94, date unknown; 4 pages. |
Levent M. Arsian and John H.L. Hansen, Language Accent Classification in American English, Robust Speech Processing Laboratory, Duke University Department of Electrical Engineering, Durham, NC, Technical Report RSPL-96-7, revised Jan. 29, 1996. p. 1-16. |
Levent M. Arsian, Foreign Accent Classification in American English, Department of Electrical Computer Engineering, Duke University, Thesis, pp. 1-200 (1996). |
MIT Project Oxygen, Pervasive, Human-Centered Computing (MIT Laboratory for Computer Science) (Jun. 2000) pp. 1-15. |
Presentation by Victor Zue, The MIT Oxygen Project, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science (Apr. 25-26, 2000) 9 pages. |
Stevenson et al.; “Name Resolution in Network and Systems Management Environments”; http://netman.cit.buffalo.edu/Doc/DStevenson/NR-NMSE.html; printed Mar. 31, 2003; 16 pages. |
“Domain Name Services,” available at http://www.pism.com/chapt09/chapt09.html, downloaded Mar. 31, 2003, 21 pages. |
“Internet Protocol Addressing,” available at http://samspade.org/d/ipdns.html, downloaded Mar. 31, 2003, 9 pages. |
“Product Features,” Guide to Call Center Automation, CRC Information Systems, Inc., Tel-ATHENA, Section 5—Company C520, p. 95, 1992. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/235,065, Denton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/247,893, Edwards et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/264,497, Edwards. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/756,955, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/420,912, Ford. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/416,737, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/098,824, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/673,118, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/673,115, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/673,103, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/673,105, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/683,039, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/099,144, Boyer et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,534, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,566, Kiefhaber et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/815,584, Kiefhaber et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/861,193, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/891,346, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,638, Flockhart et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/000,686, Flockhart et al. |
“Product Features,” Guide to Call Center Automation, Brock Control Systems, Inc., Activity Managers Series™, Section 5—Company B120, p. 59, 1992. |
Dawson, “NPRI's Powerguide, Software Overview” Call Center Magazine (Jun. 1993), p. 85. |
“Applications, NPRI's Predictive Dialing Package,” Computer Technology (Fall 1993), p. 86. |
“Call Center Software You Can't Outgrow,” Telemarketing®(Jul. 1993), p. 105. |
“VAST™, Voicelink Application Software for Teleservicing®,” System Manager User's Guide, Digital Systems (1994), pp. ii, vii-ix, 1-2, 2-41 through 2-77. |
GEOTEL Communications Corporation Web site printout entitled “Intelligent CallRouter™, Optimizing the Interaction Between Customers and Answering Resources,” 6 pages. |
Avaya, Inc. Business Advocate Product Summary, at http://www.avaya.com, downloaded on Feb. 15, 2003, Avaya, Inc. 2003, 3 pages. |
Avaya, Inc. Business Advocate Options, at http://www.avaya.com, downloaded on Feb. 15, 2003, Avaya, Inc. 2003. |
Avaya, Inc. CentreVu Advocate, Release 9, User Guide, Dec. 2000. |
Bellsouth Corp., “Frequently Asked Questions—What is a registrar?,” available at https://registration.bellsouth.net/NASApp/DNSWebUI/FAQ.jsp, downloaded Mar. 31, 2003, 4 pages. |
Avaya, Inc., “The Advantages of Load Balancing in the Multi-Call Center Enterprise,” Avaya, Inc., 2002, 14 pages. |
Foster, Robin, et al., “Avaya Business Advocate and its Relationship to Multi-Site Load Balancing Applications,” Avaya, Inc., Mar. 2002, 14 pages. |
Chavez, David, et al., “Avaya MultiVantage Software: Adapting Proven Call Processing for the Transition to Converged IP Networks,” Avaya, Inc., Aug. 2002. |
Doo-Hyun Kim et al. “Collaborative Multimedia Middleware Architecture and Advanced Internet Call Center,” Proceedings at the International Conference on Information Networking (Jan. 31, 2001), pp. 246-250. |
“When Talk Isn't Cheap,” Sm@rt Reseller, v. 3, n. 13 (Apr. 3, 2000), p. 50. |
“eGain's Commerce 2000 Platform Sets New Standard for eCommerce Customer Communications,” Business Wire (Nov. 15, 1999)., 3 pages. |