Offset remote center manipulator for robotic surgery

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11160626
  • Patent Number
    11,160,626
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 20, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 2, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
Medical, surgical, and/or robotic devices and systems often including offset remote center parallelogram manipulator linkage assemblies which constrains a position of a surgical instrument during minimally invasive robotic surgery are disclosed. The improved remote center manipulator linkage assembly advantageously enhances the range of instrument motion while at the same time reduces the overall complexity, size, and physical weight of the robotic surgical system.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally related to medical, surgical, and/or robotic devices and systems. In an exemplary embodiment, the invention provides offset remote center manipulators which constrain a position of a surgical instrument during minimally invasive robotic surgery.


Minimally invasive medical techniques are intended to reduce the amount of extraneous tissue which is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. One effect of minimally invasive surgery, for example, is reduced post-operative hospital recovery times. Because the average hospital stay for a standard surgery is typically significantly longer than the average stay for an analogous minimally invasive surgery, increased use of minimally invasive techniques could save millions of dollars in hospital costs each year. While many of the surgeries performed each year in the United States could potentially be performed in a minimally invasive manner, only a portion of the current surgeries use these advantageous techniques due to limitations in minimally invasive surgical instruments and the additional surgical training involved in mastering them.


Minimally invasive robotic surgical or telesurgical systems have been developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity and avoid some of the limitations on traditional minimally invasive techniques. In telesurgery, the surgeon uses some form of remote control, e.g., a servomechanism or the like, to manipulate surgical instrument movements, rather than directly holding and moving the instruments by hand. In telesurgery systems, the surgeon can be provided with an image of the surgical site at the surgical workstation. While viewing a two or three dimensional image of the surgical site on a display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master control devices, which in turn control motion of the servomechanically operated instruments.


The servomechanism used for telesurgery will often accept input from two master controllers (one for each of the surgeon's hands) and may include two or more robotic arms on each of which a surgical instrument is mounted. Operative communication between master controllers and associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies is typically achieved through a control system. The control system typically includes at least one processor which relays input commands from the master controllers to the associated robotic arm and instrument assemblies and back from the instrument and arm assemblies to the associated master controllers in the case of, e.g., force feedback or the like. One example of a robotic surgical system is the DA VINCI® system available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.


A variety of structural arrangements can be used to support the surgical instrument at the surgical site during robotic surgery. The driven linkage or “slave” is often called a robotic surgical manipulator, and exemplary linkage arrangements for use as a robotic surgical manipulator during minimally invasive robotic surgery are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,758,843; 6,246,200; and 5,800,423, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. These linkages often make use of a parallelogram arrangement to hold an instrument having a shaft. Such a manipulator structure can constrain movement of the instrument so that the instrument pivots about a center of spherical rotation positioned in space along the length of the rigid shaft. By aligning this center of rotation with the incision point to the internal surgical site (for example, with a trocar or cannula at an abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery), an end effector of the surgical instrument can be positioned safely by moving the proximal end of the shaft using the manipulator linkage without imposing dangerous forces against the abdominal wall. Alternative manipulator structures are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,702,805; 6,676,669; 5,855,583; 5,808,665; 5,445,166; and 5,184,601, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


While the new telesurgical systems and device have proven highly effective and advantageous, still further improvements would be desirable. In general, it would be desirable to provide improved structures and systems for performing minimally invasive robotic surgery. More specifically, it would be beneficial to enhance the efficiency and ease of use of these systems. For example, it would be particularly beneficial to improve the range of motion provided by the robotic surgical manipulator while at the same time reducing the overall complexity, size, and physical weight of the system.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally related to medical, surgical, and/or robotic devices and systems. In particular, the present invention is directed to improved remote center manipulators used to support a surgical instrument and provide a center of spherical rotation, remote from any bearings or mechanical supports, at a desired location of the instrument during minimally invasive robotic surgery. The remote center manipulator constrains the instrument to move around a fixed center of rotation, which is preferably coincident with an entry incision in a patient, such as the patient's abdominal wall. In an exemplary embodiment, the invention provides an offset remote center parallelogram manipulator linkage assembly which constrains a position of a surgical instrument during minimally invasive robotic surgery. The improved remote center manipulator advantageously enhances the range of instrument motion along first and second axes while at the same time reduces the overall complexity, size, and physical weight of the robotic surgical system. Such advantages in turn enhance the efficiency and ease of use of such robotic surgical systems.


In a first aspect of the present invention, a remote center manipulator for constraining a position of a surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument coupleable to an instrument holder during minimally invasive robotic surgery includes an elongate shaft. The shaft has a distal working end configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. The remote center manipulator comprises an articulate linkage assembly having a mounting base rotationally coupled to a parallelogram linkage base for rotation about a first axis. The parallelogram linkage base is coupled to the instrument holder by a plurality of links and joints. The links and joints define a parallelogram so as to constrain the elongate shaft of the instrument relative to a center of rotation when the instrument is mounted to the instrument holder and the shaft is moved in at least one degree of freedom. The first axis and a first side of the parallelogram adjacent the parallelogram linkage base intersect the shaft at the center of rotation. Significantly, the first side of the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis.


The first side of the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis by at least 2 degrees, preferably by 10 degrees. Generally, the first side of the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis in a range from about 2 degrees to about 45 degrees, preferably in a range from about 2 degrees to about 35 degrees. The first side of the parallelogram may sometimes extend beneath the first axis, generally at least one side of the parallelogram extends beneath the first axis. The manipulator provides an improved range of shaft motion that is greater than ±90 degrees along the first axis, preferably greater than ±95 degrees along the first axis. In particular, the cantilevered parallelogram linkage base provides shaft motion in a range from ±168 degrees along the first axis, wherein the first axis is sometimes referred to as a yaw axis. Advantageously, the offset articulate linkage assembly provides an improved range of shaft motion that is greater than ±55 degrees along a second axis, preferably greater than ±60 degrees along the second axis. Generally, the offset articulate linkage assembly provides improved shaft motion in a range from ±75 degrees along the second axis, wherein the second axis is sometimes referred to as a pitch axis.


Preferably, at least one of the links is bent at an angle so as to provide clearance for another link to rest on the bent link. This clearance prevents inter-linkage collisions so as to further allow for an improved range of pitch motion. For example, the link may be bent at an angle of about 22 degrees. The manipulator may not be balanced in at least one degree of freedom. As such, a brake system may be coupled to the articulate linkage assembly. The brake system releasably inhibits articulation of at least one of the joints. Preferably, the plurality of links and joints comprise at least one pulley and at least one flexible element coupled to the pulley that is configured to constrain shaft motion relative to the center of rotation. In one embodiment, the plurality of links and joints comprise a linkage having six pulleys and four belts. The plurality of links and joints are driven by a servomechanism. The plurality of links and the parallelogram linkage base may be offset in different planes so as to reduce the possibility of inter-linkage collisions. The plurality of links and the instrument holder however may be located in the same plane.


In general, the articulate linkage assembly is configured to constrain shaft motion relative to the center of rotation. As such, the shaft is maintained substantially aligned through the center of rotation as the shaft is pivotally moved in at least one degree of freedom. Preferably, the center of rotation is aligned with the incision point to the internal surgical site, for example, with a trocar or cannula at an abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery. As such, an end effector of the surgical instrument can be positioned safely by moving the proximal end of the shaft using the offset remote center robotic manipulator without imposing dangerous forces against the abdominal wall.


In another aspect of the present invention, a remote center manipulator for constraining a position of a surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument coupleable to an instrument holder during minimally invasive robotic surgery includes an elongate shaft. The shaft has a distal working end configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. The remote center manipulator comprises an articulate linkage assembly having a mounting base rotationally coupled to a parallelogram linkage base for rotation about a first axis. The parallelogram linkage base is coupled to the instrument holder by a plurality of links and pivots. The links and pivots define a parallelogram so as to constrain the elongate shaft of the instrument relative to a center of rotation when the instrument is mounted to the instrument holder and the shaft is moved along a plane of the parallelogram. Significantly, the first axis and a first pivot of the parallelogram adjacent the parallelogram linkage base are angularly offset and at least one of the links is bent.


The first pivot of the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis by at least 2 degrees, preferably by 10 degrees. Generally, the first pivot of the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis in a range from about 2 degrees to about 45 degrees, preferably in a range from about 2 degrees to about 35 degrees. The first pivot of the parallelogram may sometimes extend beneath the first axis, generally at least one pivot of the parallelogram extends beneath the first axis. The manipulator provides shaft motion in a range greater than ±90 degrees along the first axis, preferably greater than ±95 degrees along the first axis. In particular, the cantilevered parallelogram linkage base provides improved shaft motion in a range from ±168 degrees along the first axis, e.g., yaw axis. Advantageously, the offset parallelogram and bent link together provide shaft motion in a range greater than ±55 degrees along a second axis, preferably greater than ±60 degrees along the second axis. Typically, the offset parallelogram and bent link provide improved shaft motion in a range from ±75 degrees along the second axis, e.g., pitch axis.


At least one link is bent at an angle (e.g., 22 degrees) so as to provide clearance for another link to rest on the bent link. At least one of the links and pivots are not balanced in at least one degree of freedom. Accordingly, a brake system is coupled to the articulate linkage assembly, the brake system releasably inhibiting articulation of at least one of the pivots. Preferably, the plurality of links and pivots comprise at least one pulley and at least one flexible element coupled to the pulley that is configured to constrain shaft motion relative to the center of rotation. In one embodiment, the plurality of links and pivots comprise a linkage having six pulleys and four belts. The plurality of links and the parallelogram linkage base may be offset in different planes, while the plurality of links and the instrument holder however may be located in the same plane.


In yet another aspect of the present invention, a remote center manipulator for constraining a position of a surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument coupleable to an instrument holder during minimally invasive robotic surgery includes an elongate shaft. The shaft has a distal working end configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. The remote center manipulator comprises an articulate linkage assembly having a mounting base rotationally coupled to a parallelogram linkage base for rotation about a first axis. The parallelogram linkage base is coupled to the instrument holder by a plurality of links and pivots. The links and pivots define a parallelogram so as to constrain the elongate shaft of the instrument relative to a center of rotation when the instrument is mounted to the instrument holder and the shaft is moved along a plane of the parallelogram. The first axis and the parallelogram intersect the shaft at the center of rotation. Significantly, the parallelogram is angularly offset from the first axis. For example, a distal end of the parallelogram extending from a joint adjacent the instrument holder to the center of rotation is angularly offset from the elongate shaft.


In still another aspect of the present invention, a remote center manipulator for pivotal motion of a surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument coupleable to an instrument holder during minimally invasive robotic surgery includes an elongate shaft. The shaft has a proximal end and a distal working end configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. The remote center manipulator comprises a linkage base, a first linkage assembly, and a second linkage assembly. The first linkage assembly is pivotally supported by the linkage base and has a first outer housing. The second linkage assembly is cantilevered between a proximal pivotal joint and a distal pivotal joint and defines a second linkage assembly axis therebetween. The proximal pivotal joint couples the second linkage assembly to the first linkage assembly. The distal pivotal joint couples the second linkage assembly to the instrument holder. The first and second linkage assemblies constrain lateral motion of the shaft to pivotal motion about a center of rotation disposed along the shaft. The second linkage has a second outer housing having a recess disposed between and separated from the first joint and the second joint so that the first outer housing of the first linkage assembly can protrude into the recess and across the second linkage axis when the proximal end of the shaft moves toward the linkage base. The second linkage assembly may comprise a flexible member in tension between the proximal pivotal joint and the distal pivotal joint, and at least one guide engaging the flexible member laterally so as to displace the flexible member away from the recess.


In still another aspect of the present invention, a method for performing minimally invasive robotic surgery within a body cavity of a patient employing a surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument coupleable to an instrument holder during minimally invasive robotic surgery includes an elongate shaft. The shaft has a distal working end configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. The method comprises providing an offset articulate linkage assembly as described above. At least the distal working end of the instrument shaft is introduced through the incision into the body cavity. At least the shaft of the instrument is pivotally moved in at least one degree of freedom while at least a portion of the distal working end is within the body cavity. The offset articulate linkage assembly constrains lateral motion of the shaft to pivotal motion about the center of rotation so that the shaft is maintained substantially aligned through the center of rotation.


A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention will become apparent by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following drawings should be read with reference to the detailed description. Like numbers in different drawings refer to like elements. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, illustratively depict embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.



FIG. 1 is a schematic plane view of a portion of an operating theater illustrating a robotic surgical system, including a master surgeon console or workstation for inputting a surgical procedure and a robotic patient side cart for robotically moving surgical instruments having surgical end effectors at a surgical site.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the robotic patient side cart or stand, including two patient side robotic manipulators and one endoscope/camera robotic manipulator.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are side and front views, respectively, of the linkage of the robotic manipulators of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an articulated surgical instrument for use in the system of FIG. 1.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are side and front views, respectively, of an exemplary robotic manipulator linkage assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIGS. 6A and 6B are additional side views of the exemplary robotic manipulator linkage assembly.



FIGS. 7A and 7B are side views of the exemplary robotic manipulator linkage assembly illustrating an improved range of motion along a pitch axis.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are side views of the exemplary robotic manipulator linkage assembly illustrating an improved range of motion along a pitch axis.



FIGS. 9A through 9D are perspective view of the exemplary robotic assembly manipulator linkage illustrating an improved range of motion along both the pitch and yaw axes.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIGS. 1 through 4 illustrate a robotic surgical system 1 for performing minimally invasive robotic surgery, which is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200. An operator O (generally a surgeon) performs a minimally invasive surgical procedure on patient P lying on operating table T, the operator O manipulating one or more input devices or masters 2 at a surgeon's console 3. In response to the surgeon's inputs, a computer processor 4 of console 3 directs movement of endoscopic surgical instruments or tools 5, effecting servo-mechanical movement of the instruments via a robotic patient-side system 6 (a cart-mounted system in this example).


Typically, patient side system or cart 6 includes at least three robotic manipulator arms. Two arms or linkages 7 (mounted at the sides of cart 6 in this example) support and position servo-manipulators 8 which drive surgical tools 5; and one arm or linkage 9 (mounted at the center of cart 6 in this example) supports and positions servo-manipulator 10 which controls the motion of an endoscope/camera probe 11, which captures an image (preferably stereoscopic) of the internal surgical site.


The image of the internal surgical site is shown to surgeon or operator O by a stereoscopic display viewer 12 in surgeon's console 3, and is simultaneously shown to assistant A by an assistant's display 14. Assistant A assists in pre-positioning the manipulator 8 and 10 relative to patient P using set-up linkage arms 7, 9, in swapping tools 5 in one or more of surgical manipulator 8 (and/or 10) for alternative surgical tools or instruments 5′, in operating related non-robotic medical instruments and equipment, and the like.


In general terms, the arms or linkages 7, 9 comprise a positioning linkage or set-up arm portion of patient-side system 6, typically remaining in a fixed configuration while tissue is manipulated, and the manipulators 8, 10 comprise a driven portion which is actively articulated under the direction of surgeon's console 3. The actively driven portion is herein generally referred to as a “manipulator”, and the fixable portion of the positioning linkage of patient-side system linkage is referred to herein as a “set-up arm”, it being noted that such set-up arms may optionally have powered and computer controlled joints.


For convenience in terminology, a manipulator such as 8 actuating tissue affecting surgical tools is generally referred to herein as a PSM (patient-side manipulator), and a manipulator such as 10 controlling an image capture or data acquisition device, such as endoscope 11, is generally referred to herein as a ECM (endoscope-camera manipulator), it being noted that such telesurgical robotic manipulators may optionally actuate, maneuver and control a wide variety of instruments, tools and devices useful in surgery.



FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of the cart mounted telesurgical patient-side system 6 of FIG. 1, including two PSM's 8 and one ECM 10. Cart system 6 includes a column 15 which in turn mounts three positioning linkages or set-up arms, including two PSM set-up arms 7, each supporting one of the PSM's 8, and one ECM set-up arm 9 supporting ECM 10. The PSM set-up arms 7 each have six degrees of freedom, and are mounted one on each side of centrally mounted ECM set-up arm 9. The ECM set-up arm 9 shown has less than six degrees of freedom, and ECM 10 may not include all of the tool actuation drive system provided for articulated surgical instruments, such as are typically included in PSM 8. Each PSM 8 releasably mounts surgical tool 5 (shown in dashed lines) and ECM 10 releasably mounts endoscope probe 11 (shown in dashed lines).



FIGS. 3A and 3B are side and front views, respectively, of the linkage of the robotic surgical manipulator or PSM 8 of FIG. 2, having a remote center mechanism. PSM 8 is one prior art example of a manipulator which may be mounted and supported by a cart mount 6, ceiling mount, or floor/pedestal mount. In this example, the PSM 8 preferably includes a linkage arrangement 20 that constrains movement of tool interface housing 21 and mounted instrument or tool 5. More specifically, linkage 20 includes rigid links coupled together by rotational joints in a parallelogram arrangement so that housing 21 and tool 5 rotate around a point in space 22, as more fully described in issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,758,843.


The parallelogram arrangement of linkage 20 constrains rotation to pivoting, as indicated by arrow 22a in FIG. 3A, about an axis, sometimes called the pitch axis, which is perpendicular to the page in that illustration and which passes through pivot point 22. The links supporting the parallelogram linkage are pivotally mounted to set-up joints (7 in FIG. 2) so that tool 5 further rotates about an axis 22b (FIG. 3B), sometimes called the yaw axis. The pitch and yaw axes intersect at the remote center 22, which is aligned along a shaft 23 of tool 5. Tool 5 has still further driven degrees of freedom as supported by manipulator 8, including sliding motion of the tool along insertion axis 22c. Tool 5 includes proximal housing 24 which mounts to manipulator interface housing 21. Interface housing 21 both provides for motion of the tool 5 along axis 22c and serves to transfer actuator inputs to tool 5 from the end effector actuator servo-mechanisms of PSM 8. In this example of a remote center system, the parallelogram arrangement 20 is coupled to tool 5 so as to mechanically constrain the tool shaft 23 to rotation about pivot point 22 as the servomechanism actuates tool motion according to the surgeon's control inputs.


As tool 5 slides along axis 22c relative to manipulator 8, remote center 22 remains fixed relative to mounting base 25 (mounting point to set-up arm 7) of manipulator 8. Hence, the entire manipulator 8 is generally moved to re-position remote center 22. Linkage 20 of manipulator 8 is driven by a series of motors 26 (FIG. 3A). These motors actively move linkage 20 in response to commands from a processor (4 in FIG. 1). Motors 26 are further coupled to tool 5 so as to rotate the tool about axis 22c, and may articulate a wrist (29 in FIG. 4) at the distal end of the tool 5 about at least one, and often two, degrees of freedom. Additionally, motors 26 can be used to actuate an articulatable end effector of the tool for grasping tissues in the jaws of a forceps or the like. Motors 26 may be coupled to at least some of the joints of tool 5 using cables, as more fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,135, the full disclosure of which is also incorporated herein by reference. As described in that reference, the manipulator 8 will often include flexible members for transferring motion from the drive components to the surgical tool 5. For endoscopic procedures, manipulator 8 will often include a cannula 27. Cannula 27, which may be releasably coupled to manipulator 8, supports tool 5, preferably allowing the tool to rotate and move axially through the central bore of the cannula 27.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exploded perspective view of the articulated surgical tool or instrument 5 and proximal housing 24, that may be employed in the system of FIG. 1. Tool 5 includes elongate shaft 23 supporting end effector 28 relative to proximal housing 24. Proximal housing 24 is adapted for releasably mounting and interfacing instrument 5 to a manipulator (e.g., PSM 8 in FIGS. 1, 2, 3A, and 3B), and for transmitting drive signals and/or motion between the manipulator 8 and end effector 28. An articulated wrist mechanism 29 may provide two degrees of freedom of motion between end effector 28 and shaft 23, and the shaft 23 may be rotatable relative to proximal housing 24 so as to provide the end effector 28 with three substantially orientational degrees of freedom within the patient's body.


Referring now to FIGS. 5A and 5B, side and front views are illustrated of an exemplary offset remote center robotic manipulator 30 constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As described in greater detail below, the refined manipulator 30 provides an offset remote center parallelogram manipulator linkage assembly which constrains a position of a surgical instrument 32 coupled to an instrument holder 34 during minimally invasive robotic surgery. The surgical instrument 32 includes an elongate shaft 36 having a distal working end 38 configured for insertion through an incision in a body wall into a body cavity of a patient. It will be appreciated that the above depictions are for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the actual shape, size, or dimensions of the robotic surgical manipulator 30. This applies to all depictions hereinafter.


Generally, the offset remote center robotic manipulator 30 is configured to constrain shaft 36 motion relative to a center of rotation 66. As such, the shaft 36 is maintained substantially aligned through the center of rotation 66 as the shaft 36 is pivotally moved in at least one degree of freedom. Preferably, the center of rotation 66 is aligned with the incision point to the internal surgical site, for example, with a trocar or cannula at an abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery. As such, an end effector of the surgical instrument 32 can be positioned safely by moving the proximal end of the shaft 36 using the offset remote center robotic manipulator 30 without imposing dangerous forces against the abdominal wall.


Referring back to FIG. 5A, the refined remote center manipulator generally includes an articulate linkage assembly 30 having a mounting base 40, a parallelogram linkage base 42, and a plurality of links 44, 46 and joints 48, 50, 52, 54. The term “joint” is used interchangeably with the term “pivot” herein. The mounting base 40 is rotationally coupled to the parallelogram linkage base 42 for rotation about a first axis 56, also known as the yaw axis, as indicated by arrow 58. The mounting base 40 allows for the surgical manipulator 30 to be mounted and supported by set-up arms/joints of a cart mount, ceiling mount, floor/pedestal mount, or other mounting surface. The mounting base 40 in this embodiment is fixed to base support 60 by screws or bolts 62, wherein the base support 60 is adapted to be attached to the set-up arms/joints. The parallelogram linkage base 42 is coupled to the instrument holder 34 by rigid links 44, 46 coupled together by rotational pivot joints 48, 50, 52, 54. The links 44, 46 and joints 48, 50, 52, 54 define a parallelogram 64 so as to constrain the elongate shaft 36 of the instrument 32 relative to the center of rotation 66 when the instrument 32 is mounted to the instrument holder 34 and the shaft 36 is moved along a plane of the parallelogram 64.


Significantly, the first axis 56 and the parallelogram 64 intersect the shaft 36 at the center of rotation 66, wherein the parallelogram 64 is angularly offset from the first axis 56. Specifically, a first side 68 which originates from the first pivot 48 of the parallelogram 64 adjacent the parallelogram linkage base 40 and the first axis 56 intersect the shaft 36 at the center of rotation 66, wherein the first side 68 and the first pivot 48 of the parallelogram 64 are angularly offset from the first axis 56. The first side 68 and first pivot 48 of the parallelogram 64 are offset from the first axis 56 by an angle α of at least 2 degrees, preferably by 10 degrees. Generally, the first side 68 and first pivot 48 of the parallelogram 64 are offset from the first axis 56 by angle α in a range from about 2 degrees to about 45 degrees, preferably in a range from about 2 degrees to about 35 degrees.


Referring now to FIGS. 6A and 6B, additional side views of the exemplary robotic manipulator linkage assembly 30 are illustrated showing the instrument holder 34 in an extended position. The offset parallelogram 64 arrangement allows for improved rotation of instrument 32 and holder 34 over the prior art example described in FIGS. 3A and 3B while the remote center of rotation 66 remains at the same location. Specifically, as shown in FIGS. 7A, 7B, 8A, 8B, 9C and 9D, the offset articulate linkage assembly 30 provides an improved range of shaft 36 motion that is greater than ±55 degrees relative to a second axis (which is perpendicular to the page in these illustrations and which passes through pivot point 66), preferably greater than ±60 degrees relative to the second axis. Generally, the offset articulate linkage assembly 30 constrains shaft 36 motion about pivot point 66 in a range from ±75 degrees relative to the second axis as indicated by arrow 72, wherein the second axis is sometimes referred to as a pitch axis. The manipulator 30 also provides an improved range of shaft 36 motion that is greater than ±90 degrees relative to the first axis 56, preferably greater than ±95 degrees relative to the first axis 56, as indicated by arrow 58 in FIGS. 9A and 9B. Typically, the cantilevered parallelogram linkage base 42 constrains shaft 36 motion about pivot point 66 in a range from ±168 degrees relative to the first axis 56.


Additionally, similar to the discussed prior art, the yaw axis 56, the pitch axis (which is perpendicular to the page), and an insertion axis 74 all intersect with each other at the remote center 66, which is aligned along a shaft 36 of the instrument 32. Thus, the instrument 32 can be pivotally rotated though desired angles as indicated by arrows 58 and 72 while the remote center of rotation 66 remains fixed in space relative to the mounting base 40 (mounting point to set-up arm) of manipulator 30. Hence, the entire manipulator 30 is generally moved to re-position the remote center 66. It will further be appreciated that the instrument 32 still has further driven degrees of freedom as supported by the offset remote center manipulator 30, including sliding motion of the instrument along the insertion axis 74.


The new and improved offset articulate linkage assembly 30 which decouples the first pivot 48 and first side 68 of the parallelogram 64 from the yaw axis 56 advantageously enhances the range of instrument 32 motion about pivot point 66 relative to the second axis, as indicated by arrow 72. The manipulator 30 further allows for an enhanced range of motion relative to the first axis 56, as indicated by arrow 58. An improved pivot range of motion along pitch and yaw axes in turn enhances the efficiency and ease of use of such robotic surgical systems. For example, the overall complexity of the robotic surgical system may be reduced due to the improved range of motion of the system. Specifically, the number of degrees of freedom in the set-up joints/arms may be reduced (e.g., less than six degrees of freedom). This allows for a simpler system platform requiring less pre-configuration of the set-up joints. As such, normal operating room personnel may rapidly arrange and prepare the robotic system for surgery with little or no specialized training.


The plurality of links comprise an offset yaw link 42, a lowered vertical link 44, and a main bent link 46. The main link 46 is bent at an angle so as to provide clearance for the vertical link 44 to rest on the main bent link 46. This clearance prevents inter-linkage collisions between the vertical link 44 and the main bent link 46. For example, the main link 46 may be bent at an angle of about 22 degrees to allow clearance over a pitch dive 72 as shown in FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 9D. In such an embodiment, the main bent link 46 and the vertical link 44 as well as the instrument holder 34 are located in the same plane. It will be appreciated however that the main link 46 and the vertical link 44 may alternatively be offset in different planes (i.e., placed side by side) to reduce inter-linkage collisions in lieu of bending main link 46. The vertical link 44 pivot 48 is lower relative to the yaw axis 56 so as to provide the offset parallelogram 64 arrangement, as discussed above. The yaw link 42 is offset from links 44, 46, as best seen in FIGS. 9B through 9D. Link 42 and links 44, 46 are not in the same plane, but are rather offset side by side so as to reduce the possibility of inter-linkage collisions between link 42 and links 44, 46.


At least one of the rigid links 42, 44, 46 coupled together by rotational pivot joints 48, 50, 52, 54 are not completely balanced in at least one degree of freedom. As such, a brake system may be coupled to the articulate linkage assembly 30. The brake system releasably inhibits articulation of at least one of the joints 48, 50, 52, 54. It will be appreciated that the offset remote center manipulator 30 may comprise a lighter system as the linkage is free of any counter-balancing weights. As such, the links 42, 44, 46 will preferably comprise sufficiently rigid and stiff structures so as to support any vibration issues associated with the lighter manipulator 30. It will further be appreciated that the offset remote center manipulator 30 may optionally be balanced by the use of weights, tension springs, gas springs, torsion springs, compression springs, air or hydraulic cylinders, torque motors, or combinations thereof.


Referring back to FIGS. 6B, 7B, and 8B, the offset remote center manipulator 30 may preferably comprise six pulleys 76, 78a, 78b, 80, 82a, 82b and four flexible elements 84a, 84b, 86a, 86b coupled to the pulleys 76, 78a, 78b, 80, 82a, 82b that are configured to constrain shaft 36 motion relative to the center of rotation 66. Links 42 and 46 are kept from rotating relative to each other by flexible elements 84a, 84b running on two pulleys 76, 78a, with one pulley 76 fixed to link 42 and one pulley 78a fixed to link 46. Links 44 and 34 are likewise kept from rotating relative to each other by a flexible elements 86a, 86b running on the remaining four pulleys 78b, 80, 82a, 82b, with one pulley 78b fixed to link 44, one pulley 80 fixed to link 34, and idler pulleys 82a, 82b to get the flexible elements 86a, 86b around the main bent link 46. Hence, links 42 and 46 can translate but not rotate relative to each other to maintain the parallelogram shape 64. Likewise, links 44 and 34 can translate but not rotate relative to each other to maintain the parallelogram shape 64. It will be appreciated that the term pulley 76, 78a, 78b, 80, 82a, 82b can include wheels, gears, sprockets, and the like.


The flexible element 84a, 84b, 86a, 86b may include belts, chains, or cables connected around the pulleys 76, 78a, 78b, 80, 82a, 82b. Preferably, the flexible elements comprise multi-layer metal belts, such as stainless steel belts having a breaking strength of approximately 800 lbs and being about a quarter inch wide. The belts are preferably multi-layered utilizing at least 3 plies, preferably 5 plies to be strong enough to carry an adequate tension load yet sufficiently thin enough to not fatigue when repeatedly bent around the pulleys. Pulleys 76 and 78a have approximately the same diameter, e.g., 2.2 inches. Smaller pulleys 78b and 80 have approximately the same diameter, e.g., 1.8 inches. There are two idler pulleys 82a, 82b at the bend of the main link 46 to facilitate running of belts 86a, 86b in opposite directions so as to allow for attachment of the belts ends to be more robust. Utilization of non-continuous offset belts 84a, 84b and 86a, 86b provides for stress reduction, particularly at the attachment points, thus minimizing failures. Further, non-continuous belts allow for convenient tension and position adjustments. It will further be appreciated that belts 84a, 84b as well as belts 86a, 86b may optionally comprise continuous single belts. Additionally, the metal belts may be lightly coupled to flat flex cables that carry electrical signals along the manipulator arm.


The offset articulate linkage assembly 30 is driven by a series of motors. Motors may be located within the plurality of links to drive the pulley and belt mechanisms. Preferably, a majority of the motors are housed in the lowered vertical link 44. In particular, the motor which drives the pitch axis 72 rotating link 44 relative to link 42 through spur gears and a harmonic drive as well as the motors that run instrument actuation cables (e.g., wrist drive cables which may be spring tensioned) may be housed in link 44. Placement of the vertical link 44, the main bent link 46, and the instrument holder 34 in the same plane is advantageous as the motors that run the actuation cables are housed in link 44. Further, having the vertical link 44, the main bent link 46, and the instrument holder 34 in the same plane allows for space minimization at the distal end of the manipulator 30, which is of significant importance when performing minimally invasive robotic surgery in a confined operating environment. The motor driving the yaw axis 58 may be housed in mounting base 40.


Although certain exemplary embodiments and methods have been described in some detail, for clarity of understanding and by way of example, it will be apparent from the foregoing disclosure to those skilled in the art that variations, modifications, changes, and adaptations of such embodiments and methods may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a base link having a proximal end and a distal end;a first link having a proximal end and a distal end, the first link proximal end rotatably coupled to the base link distal end;a second link having a proximal end and a distal end, the second link proximal end rotatably coupled to the first link distal end, the second link constrained from rotating relative to the base link such that the second link and base link are parallel with each other; andan instrument holder link rotatably coupled to the second link distal end, the instrument holder link constrained from rotating relative to the first link such that the instrument holder link and the first link are parallel with each other;wherein the second link is bent at an angle so as to provide clearance for the first link to rest on the second link.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising at least one pulley and at least one flexible element coupled to the pulley that is configured to constrain shaft motion relative to the center of rotation.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, the instrument holder configured to slidably extend the surgical instrument along a longitudinal axis of the instrument holder.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, the first link housing at least one motor for driving the manipulator.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a mounting base, wherein the base further comprises a linkage axis coupling the proximal and distal ends, the base link proximal end directly coupled to the mounting base, the base link proximal end further rotatable relative to the mounting base about a first axis, the linkage axis and the first axis intersecting at the base link proximal end.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, the instrument holder configured to slidably extend the surgical instrument along a longitudinal axis of the instrument holder.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, the first link housing at least one motor for driving the manipulator.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, at least two directly coupled links having planes of rotation offset from each other.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, the first link and the second link having planes of rotation offset from each other.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 8, the instrument holder link and the second link having planes of rotation offset from each other.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a mounting base, the base link proximal end coupled to the mounting base, the base link proximal end rotatable relative to the mounting base about a first axis, the base link distal end lying on an axis offset from the first axis.
US Referenced Citations (170)
Number Name Date Kind
369023 Newell Aug 1887 A
586731 Monroe Jul 1897 A
669393 Henry Mar 1901 A
1515335 Bosco Nov 1924 A
1597152 Heintz Aug 1926 A
1700468 Clutter et al. Jan 1929 A
2027275 Foster Jan 1936 A
D134917 Eubanks Jan 1943 S
2331382 Eubanks Oct 1943 A
2815697 Saunders-Singer Dec 1957 A
3011034 Laviana et al. Nov 1961 A
3025647 Moody Mar 1962 A
3193633 Netzel et al. Jul 1965 A
3463329 Gartner Aug 1969 A
3500692 Arlon et al. Mar 1970 A
3695215 Lambiris Oct 1972 A
3736056 Burnet et al. May 1973 A
3739649 Pacini et al. Jun 1973 A
3813843 Wooldridge et al. Jun 1974 A
3872960 Gabor Mar 1975 A
3954282 Hege May 1976 A
3967240 Young Jun 1976 A
3976206 Flatau Aug 1976 A
4030376 Baudoin et al. Jun 1977 A
4143445 Fougman Mar 1979 A
4260319 Motoda et al. Apr 1981 A
4312432 Sugawa Jan 1982 A
4362525 Sproul Dec 1982 A
4396919 Speicher Aug 1983 A
4486183 Posiviata et al. Dec 1984 A
4537084 Passemard et al. Aug 1985 A
4543033 Czermak et al. Sep 1985 A
4696501 Webb Sep 1987 A
4697467 Ando Oct 1987 A
4728252 Lada et al. Mar 1988 A
4897015 Abbe et al. Jan 1990 A
4903536 Salisbury, Jr. Feb 1990 A
4921393 Andeen et al. May 1990 A
4923053 Daniels May 1990 A
5060532 Barker Oct 1991 A
5074539 Wells et al. Dec 1991 A
5078140 Kwoh Jan 1992 A
5103263 Moore et al. Apr 1992 A
5129911 Siczek et al. Jul 1992 A
5149057 Meurer Sep 1992 A
5150937 Yakou Sep 1992 A
5157980 Chezzi Oct 1992 A
5184601 Putman Feb 1993 A
5203247 D'Arcy Apr 1993 A
5209747 Knoepfler May 1993 A
5217003 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5217453 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5219351 Teubner et al. Jun 1993 A
5222409 Dalakian Jun 1993 A
5257998 Ota et al. Nov 1993 A
5273039 Fujiwara et al. Dec 1993 A
5279309 Taylor et al. Jan 1994 A
5329800 Herdzina et al. Jul 1994 A
5333986 Mizukami et al. Aug 1994 A
5339799 Kami et al. Aug 1994 A
5339929 Chern Aug 1994 A
5343385 Joskowicz et al. Aug 1994 A
5353202 Ansell et al. Oct 1994 A
5368015 Wilk Nov 1994 A
5397323 Taylor et al. Mar 1995 A
5402801 Taylor Apr 1995 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5427581 McGrath et al. Jun 1995 A
5445166 Taylor Aug 1995 A
5458479 Minghetti Oct 1995 A
5479929 Cooper et al. Jan 1996 A
5572999 Funda et al. Nov 1996 A
5599268 Andersson et al. Feb 1997 A
5630431 Taylor May 1997 A
5682795 Solomon et al. Nov 1997 A
5695500 Taylor et al. Dec 1997 A
5697939 Kubota et al. Dec 1997 A
5710870 Ohm et al. Jan 1998 A
5749362 Funda et al. May 1998 A
5762458 Wang et al. Jun 1998 A
5778730 Solomon et al. Jul 1998 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5794487 Solomon et al. Aug 1998 A
5800423 Jensen et al. Sep 1998 A
5808665 Green Sep 1998 A
5813282 Azuma Sep 1998 A
5815640 Wang et al. Sep 1998 A
5817084 Jensen et al. Oct 1998 A
5841950 Wang et al. Nov 1998 A
5855583 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5878193 Wang et al. Mar 1999 A
5879001 Perego Mar 1999 A
5907664 Wang et al. May 1999 A
5931832 Jensen Aug 1999 A
5967112 Haga et al. Oct 1999 A
6001108 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6007550 Wang et al. Dec 1999 A
6106511 Jensen Aug 2000 A
6116197 Tsunoda et al. Sep 2000 A
6132368 Cooper Oct 2000 A
6167686 Becker et al. Jan 2001 B1
6206903 Ramans Mar 2001 B1
6220106 Hayashi Apr 2001 B1
6246200 Blumenkranz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6309403 Minor et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324934 Monaghan Dec 2001 B1
6346072 Cooper Feb 2002 B1
6367608 Franceschi Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6406472 Jensen Jun 2002 B1
6428266 Solomon et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432112 Brock et al. Aug 2002 B2
6441577 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2002 B2
6451027 Cooper et al. Sep 2002 B1
6594552 Nowlin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6659939 Moll et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676669 Charles et al. Jan 2004 B2
6699235 Wallace et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702805 Stuart et al. Mar 2004 B1
6737826 Gilchrist May 2004 B2
6758843 Jensen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6786896 Madhani et al. Sep 2004 B1
6788018 Blumenkranz et al. Sep 2004 B1
6871643 Cooper et al. Mar 2005 B2
6923612 Hansl Aug 2005 B2
6969385 Moreyra Nov 2005 B2
7021173 Stoianovici et al. Apr 2006 B2
7101363 Nishizawa et al. Sep 2006 B2
7108688 Jensen Sep 2006 B2
7124657 Nagai et al. Oct 2006 B2
7316681 Madhani et al. Jan 2008 B2
7395606 Crampton et al. Jul 2008 B2
7422592 Morley et al. Sep 2008 B2
7594912 Cooper et al. Sep 2009 B2
7644906 Rodrique et al. Jan 2010 B2
7854738 Lee et al. Dec 2010 B2
7865266 Moll et al. Jan 2011 B2
7935130 Williams May 2011 B2
7947050 Lee et al. May 2011 B2
7947051 Lee et al. May 2011 B2
8062288 Cooper et al. Nov 2011 B2
8256319 Cooper et al. Sep 2012 B2
8281683 Garrec et al. Oct 2012 B2
8347755 Bennett et al. Jan 2013 B2
8347756 Bennett et al. Jan 2013 B2
8365633 Simaan et al. Feb 2013 B2
8512316 Jinno et al. Aug 2013 B2
8562594 Cooper et al. Oct 2013 B2
9068628 Solomon et al. Jun 2015 B2
9261172 Solomon et al. Feb 2016 B2
9797484 Solomon et al. Oct 2017 B2
9803727 Solomon et al. Oct 2017 B2
10449011 Coooper et al. Oct 2019 B2
10646292 Solomon et al. May 2020 B2
20010027313 Shimmura et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020082612 Moll et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091374 Cooper Jul 2002 A1
20030233102 Nakamura et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040024385 Stuart Feb 2004 A1
20050043718 Madhani et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050241236 Smith Nov 2005 A1
20070142969 Devengenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080021440 Solomon Jan 2008 A1
20080087871 Schena et al. Apr 2008 A1
20090229388 Lee et al. Sep 2009 A1
20110107866 Oka et al. May 2011 A1
20110137322 Moll et al. Jun 2011 A1
20170143425 Solomon May 2017 A9
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
482439 Dec 1969 CH
2819976 Nov 1979 DE
0239409 Sep 1987 EP
0291292 Nov 1988 EP
0595291 May 1994 EP
2460762 Jan 1981 FR
2593106 Jul 1987 FR
2845889 Apr 2004 FR
2117732 Oct 1983 GB
H0759788 Mar 1995 JP
H07136173 May 1995 JP
WO-9501757 Jan 1995 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20186036.8 dated Nov. 20, 2020, 8 pages.
Alexander, Arthur D. III, “Impacts of Telemation on Modern Society,” Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Centre for Mechanical Sciences 1st CISM IFToMM Symposium, Sep. 5-8, 1974, pp. 121-136, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag.
Belt Technologies, “Belt Technologies, Inc. Design Guide and Engineer's Reference for Metal Belts,” 1999, 24 pages.
Ben Gayed, M. et al., “An Advanced Control Micromanipulator for Surgical Applications,” Systems Science, 1987, pp. 123-134, vol. 13.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16179332.8, dated Jun. 22, 2017, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP10175702, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP10175715, dated May 24, 2012, 7 pages.
Guerrouad, Aicha et al., “SMOS: Stereotaxical Microtelemanipulator for Ocular Surgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th annual international conference, Nov. 9-12, 1989, pp. 879-880, vol. 3, IEEE.
NG, W.S. et al., “Robotic Surgery, A First-Hand Experience in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Mar 1993, pp. 120-125, vol. 12—Issue 1, IEEE.
PCT/US05/32488 International Search Report, dated May 9, 2006, 4 pages.
PCT/US05/32488 Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, received May 10, 2006, 7 pages.
PCT/US06/62377 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jul. 16, 2008, 6 pages.
Rininsland, Hermann; “ARTEMIS: A telemanipulator for cardiac surgery,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 16, Supplement 2, pp. S106-S111, Nov. 1999.
Rosheim, Mark E., “Robot Evolution: Development of Anthrobotics,” Pub. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994, Chapter 2, pp. 37-156.
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200015919 A1 Jan 2020 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 14035014 Sep 2013 US
Child 16577349 US
Parent 13562547 Jul 2012 US
Child 14035014 US
Parent 13251881 Oct 2011 US
Child 13562547 US
Parent 12499392 Jul 2009 US
Child 13251881 US
Parent 10957077 Sep 2004 US
Child 12499392 US