On-site cleaning gas generation for process chamber cleaning

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6981508
  • Patent Number
    6,981,508
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 27, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 3, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
Provided herein is a method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing. This method comprises the steps of converting a non-cleaning feed gas to a cleaning gas in a remote location and then delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber for cleaning. Such method may further comprise the step of activating the cleaning gas outside the chamber before the delivery of the gas to the chamber. Also provided is a method of eliminating non-cleaning feed gas from the cleaning gas by cryo condensation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to the field of semiconductor manufacturing. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method of on-site cleaning gas, e.g., F2, generation for semiconductor and/or flat panel display process chamber cleaning, and a method of eliminating HF from F2 generator by, for example, cryo condensation.


2. Description of the Related Art


One of the primary steps in the fabrication of modern semiconductor devices is the formation of a layer or film on a substrate. As is well known in this art, such a layer can be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In a conventional plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) processes, a controlled plasma is formed using radiofrequency (RF) energy or microwave energy to decompose and/or energize reactive species in reactant gases to produce the desired film.


One problem that arises during such CVD processes is that unwanted deposition occurs on some or all of the processing chamber's interior surfaces, leading to potentially high maintenance costs. With CVD of a desired film onto a substrate, the deposition of undesired residues can occur on any surface, because the reactive gases can diffuse to most parts of the processing chamber, even between cracks and around corners. During subsequent substrate depositions, these residues can accelerate until a continuous film is grown on the undesired parts. Over time, failure to clean the residue from the CVD apparatus often degrades process yield.


When excess deposition starts to interfere with the CVD system's performance, various parts of the chamber can be replaced to remove unwanted accumulations thereon. However, the replacement would potentially increase the maintenance cost. Moreover, such maintenance adversely affects throughput of the CVD system. Therefore, cleaning of the processing chamber is regularly performed to remove such unwanted residues from the chamber walls, heater, and other process kit parts.


Commonly performed between deposition steps for every substrate (or every n substrates), in situ cleaning procedures using one or more cleaning (i.e., etchant) gases are performed to remove the unwanted residual material accumulated during the deposition process. Common cleaning techniques known to those having ordinary skill in this art include thermal, RF plasma, and microwave plasma techniques.


A radiofrequency plasma cleaning process could use nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), for example, because such a technique is capable of imparting the high energies required to dissociate a more stable compound. First, NF3 is flowed into the processing chamber being cleaned. Radiofrequency energy is then applied (e.g., via the substrate processing system's capacitively coupled electrodes), thus generating the fluorine radicals (F*) which remove the unwanted residues from the processing chamber's components. A frequency of 13.56 megahertz (MHz) is commonly used to excite the plasma.


However, the radiofrequency plasma process using NF3 could be costly, as NF3 is very expensive. Other gases such as SF6 and C2F6 are cheaper, but usually cause significant environmental pollution. Therefore, the prior art is deficient in the lack of effective and economic means of cleaning a semiconductor and/or flat panel display process chamber with minimal environmental pollution. Specifically, the prior art is deficient in the lack of effective means of cleaning a process chamber by generating the cleaning gas, such as, F2 on site and further delivering the cleaning gas to the chamber so that the HF is eliminated from the F2 generator by cryo condensation. The present invention fulfills these long-standing needs and desires in the art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided herein in one embodiment of the present invention is a method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing. This method comprises the steps of converting a non-cleaning feed gas to a cleaning gas in a remote location and then delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber for cleaning. This method may further comprise the step of activating the cleaning gas outside the chamber before the delivery of the gas to the chamber.


Also provided herein in another embodiment of the present invention is an alternative method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing. This method comprises the steps of converting a feed gas to a cleaning gas in a remote location, wherein the resulting gas is a mixture of the feed and cleaning gas; transferring the resulting gas mixture to a cold trap, wherein the feed gas is turned into a liquid form, and the cleaning gas remains in a gaseous form; and delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber for cleaning. This method may further comprise the steps of pumping the cleaning gas into a storage unit and/or activating the cleaning gas outside the chamber before the delivery of the cleaning gas to the chamber.


Other and further aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description of the embodiments of the invention given for the purpose of disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the matter in which the above-recited features, advantages and objects of the invention, as well as others which will become clear, are attained and can be understood in detail, more particular descriptions of the invention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to certain embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. These drawings form a part of the specification. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and therefore are not to be considered limiting in their scope.



FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The feed gas (e.g., HF) is eliminated from the cleaning gas (e.g., F2) generator by cryo condensation, and then the purified cleaning gas is delivered into a storage unit before its arrival to the PECVD process chamber.



FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The feed gas is eliminated from the cleaning gas generator by cryo condensation, and the purified cleaning gas is delivered into a storage unit. The cleaning gas is then activated before its arrival to the PECVD process chamber.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein in one embodiment of the present invention is a method of on-site cleaning gas generation for a semiconductor and/or flat panel display process chamber cleaning. A cheap feed stock gas, such as HF may be used instead of the expensive NF3. HF itself does not clean the chamber. However, when HF is electrolyzed, the resulting F2 may be used as a cleaning gas.


To clean the process chamber, the feed gas, e.g. hydrogen fluoride, is used as a precursor to form a cleaning gas (F2) in a remote location (i.e., pump garage area). That is, the F2 cleaning gas is generated on-site. Then F2 is delivered to the chamber for chamber cleaning. Optionally, the cleaning gas F2 can be activated outside the chamber to increase the cleaning efficiency via a remote plasma source (RPS). During the activation, F2 is chemically turned into 2F, i.e. two equivalents of atomic fluorine (F), in the plasma excitation environment.


A typical method of generating F2 from HF is electrolysis (HF→F2+H2). After electrolysis, the F2 and any residual HF in gaseous form are transferred from the generator to a cold trap cylinder, wherein the F2 and HF are separated (FIGS. 1 and 2). Specifically, the cold trap turns HF into a liquid state, while F2 is pumped into the 100-liter storage cylinder, and further supplied to the process chamber. The byproduct of the electrolysis H2 is sent to an exhaust system.


The present method reduces the cost of chamber cleaning and eliminates the use of global warming gas. Due to safety concerns, F2 is generated on-demand to minimize the need for storage. However, a mini-storage device can be used. Additionally, the method of eliminating HF from the generated cleaning gas by cryo condensation has several advantages over the state-of-art methods which uses sodium fluoride trap. For example, the changing cold trap does not require any maintenance; and secondly, sodium contamination is eliminated from the gas line.


As described above, provided herein is a method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing. This method comprises the steps of converting a non-cleaning feed gas to a cleaning gas in a remote location and then delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber for cleaning. Such a method may further comprise the step of activating the cleaning gas outside the chamber before the delivery of the gas to the chamber. Specifically, the activation may be performed through a remote plasma source, a heat source, or an electrical source. Representative examples of a remote plasma source include a microwave energy source or a radiofrequency energy source.


In this method, an example of the non-cleaning feed gas is HF, and the generated cleaning gas is F2. In one aspect, the conversion is done through electrolysis.


Also provided herein in another embodiment of the present invention is an alternative method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing. This method comprises the steps of converting a feed gas to a cleaning gas in a remote location, wherein the resulting gas is a mixture of the feed and cleaning gas; transferring the resulting gas mixture to a cold trap, wherein the feed gas is turned into a liquid form, and the cleaning gas remains in a gaseous form; and delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber for cleaning. This method may further comprise the steps of pumping the cleaning gas into a storage unit and/or activating the cleaning gas outside the chamber before the delivery of the gas to the chamber. Specifically, the activation may be performed through a remote plasma source, a heat source, or an electrical source. Representative examples of remote plasma sources familiar to those having ordinary skill in this art include a microwave energy source or a radiofrequency energy source.


Further in this method, an example of the non-cleaning feed gas is HF, and the generated cleaning gas is F2. Usually, the conversion is done through electrolysis.


One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and obtain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as those inherent therein. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in practicing the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing, comprising: converting a feed gas to a mixture of the feed gas and a cleaning gas in a device at a remote location and in fluid communication with the process chamber; separating the feed gas from the cleaning gas by liquefying the feed gas; and delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the feed gas is HF.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the cleaning gas is F2.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said converting the feed gas is done by electrolysis.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising exposing the cleaning gas to a remote plasma source outside the chamber before said delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber.
  • 6. A method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing, comprising: converting a feed gas to a cleaning gas in a device in a remote location and in fluid communication with the process chamber, wherein a resulting gas is a mixture of the feed gas and the cleaning gas; transferring the resulting gas to a trap, wherein the feed gas is converted into a liquid form, and the cleaning gas remains in a gaseous form; and delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, prior to said delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber, further comprising: pumping the cleaning gas into a storage unit.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, after said pumping the cleaning gas into a storage unit, further comprising: exposing the cleaning gas to a remote plasma source outside the chamber before said delivering the cleaning gas to the process chamber.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said exposing is performed through a source selected from the group consisting of a remote plasma source, a heat source, and an electrical source.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein said remote plasma source is selected from the group consisting of a microwave energy source and a radiofrequency energy source.
  • 11. The method of claim 6, wherein the feed gas is HF.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cleaning gas is F2.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein said converting the feed gas is done by electrolysis.
  • 14. The method of claim 6, wherein the trap is a cold trap.
  • 15. A method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing, comprising: converting a feed gas comprising HF to a cleaning gas comprising F2 in a device in a remote location and in fluid communication with the process chamber, wherein a resulting gas is a mixture of HF and F2; tansferring the resulting gas to a trap, wherein the HF is converted into a liquid form, and the F2 remains in a gaseous form; activating the F2 outside the chamber to form atomic fluorine; and delivering the atomic fluorine to the process chamber.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, prior to said activating the F2, further comprising pumping the F2 into a storage unit.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said activating is performed through a source selected from the group consisting of a remote plasma source, a heat source, and an electrical source.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said remote plasma source is selected from the group consisting of a microwave energy source and a radiofrequency energy source.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, wherein said converting the HF is done by electrolysis.
  • 20. The method of claim 15, wherein the trap is a cold trap.
  • 21. A method for cleaning a process chamber for semiconductor and/or flat panel display manufacturing, comprising: converting HF to F2 in a cleaning gas generator in a remote location in fluid communication with the process chamber, wherein a resulting gas is a mixture of the HF and the F2; transferring the resulting gas to a trap, wherein the HF is converted into a liquid form, and the F2 remains in a gaseous form; and delivering the F2 to the process chamber.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, prior to said delivering the F2 to the process chamber, further comprising: pumping the F2 into a storage unit.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, after said pumping the F2 into a storage unit, further comprising: exposing the F2 to a remote plasma source outside the chamber.
  • 24. The method ot claim 23, wherein said remote plasma source is selected from the group consisting of a microwave energy source and a radiofrequency energy source.
  • 25. The method of claim 21, wherein said converting the HF is done by electrolysis.
  • 26. The method of claim 21, wherein the trap is a cold trap.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/741,529, filed Dec. 19, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,258, which is herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
2879212 Hill et al. Mar 1959 A
3146179 Davies Aug 1964 A
3684667 Sayce Aug 1972 A
3976447 Merchant et al. Aug 1976 A
4125443 Grant et al. Nov 1978 A
4176018 Faron et al. Nov 1979 A
4312718 Watanabe et al. Jan 1982 A
4498953 Cook et al. Feb 1985 A
4818326 Liu et al. Apr 1989 A
4900395 Syverson et al. Feb 1990 A
4960488 Law et al. Oct 1990 A
5002632 Loewenstein et al. Mar 1991 A
5129958 Nagashima et al. Jul 1992 A
5180466 Shin Jan 1993 A
5207836 Chang May 1993 A
5284605 Nicolas Feb 1994 A
5298112 Hayasaka et al. Mar 1994 A
5336832 Keller Aug 1994 A
5366585 Robertson et al. Nov 1994 A
5378324 Hodgson Jan 1995 A
5405491 Shahvandi et al. Apr 1995 A
5406008 Sievert Apr 1995 A
5425842 Zijlstra Jun 1995 A
5449411 Fukuda et al. Sep 1995 A
5534107 Gray et al. Jul 1996 A
5549802 Guo Aug 1996 A
5565038 Ashley Oct 1996 A
5569151 Karwacki et al. Oct 1996 A
5597495 Keil et al. Jan 1997 A
5620526 Watatani et al. Apr 1997 A
5628894 Tarancon May 1997 A
5679215 Barnes et al. Oct 1997 A
5685916 Ye et al. Nov 1997 A
5688384 Hodgeson et al. Nov 1997 A
5693147 Ward et al. Dec 1997 A
5705080 Leung et al. Jan 1998 A
5756400 Ye et al. May 1998 A
5762813 Takiyama et al. Jun 1998 A
5779886 Tarancon Jul 1998 A
5788776 Shang et al. Aug 1998 A
5788778 Shang et al. Aug 1998 A
5788799 Steger et al. Aug 1998 A
5824607 Trow et al. Oct 1998 A
5844195 Fairbairn et al. Dec 1998 A
5846886 Hattori et al. Dec 1998 A
5849092 Xi et al. Dec 1998 A
5849639 Molloy et al. Dec 1998 A
5872061 Lee et al. Feb 1999 A
5880031 Wong Mar 1999 A
5880032 Doi et al. Mar 1999 A
5888309 Yu Mar 1999 A
5904566 Tao et al. May 1999 A
5935874 Kennard Aug 1999 A
5958801 Langley Sep 1999 A
5970376 Chen Oct 1999 A
5980769 Yanagisawa et al. Nov 1999 A
6007733 Jang et al. Dec 1999 A
6014979 Van Autryve et al. Jan 2000 A
6020035 Gupta et al. Feb 2000 A
6024887 Kuo et al. Feb 2000 A
6024888 Watanabe et al. Feb 2000 A
6029718 Jackson et al. Feb 2000 A
6051505 Chu et al. Apr 2000 A
6109206 Maydan et al. Aug 2000 A
6117793 Tang Sep 2000 A
6125859 Kao et al. Oct 2000 A
6159333 Gupta et al. Dec 2000 A
6209483 Dyer Apr 2001 B1
6255222 Herchen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264852 Herchen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271148 Kao et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286451 Ishikawa et al. Sep 2001 B1
6352081 Lu et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362031 Yamaguchi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366346 Nowak et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366366 Nakamura Apr 2002 B1
6374831 Chandran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379575 Yin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383257 McDermott et al. May 2002 B1
6387288 Bjorkman et al. May 2002 B1
6500356 Goto et al. Dec 2002 B2
6544345 Mayer et al. Apr 2003 B1
6602433 Bhardwaj et al. Aug 2003 B1
20020074013 Yadav et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030010354 Goto et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030098038 Siegele et al. May 2003 A1
20030109144 Goto et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121796 Siegele et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030192569 Goto et al. Oct 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
429809 Jun 1926 DE
0 697 467 Feb 1996 EP
0 819 780 Jan 1998 EP
0 965 661 Dec 1999 EP
1 076 355 Feb 2001 EP
3077786 Apr 1991 JP
04311570 Nov 1992 JP
5109673 Apr 1993 JP
6033054 Feb 1994 JP
6080962 Mar 1994 JP
08017804 Jan 1996 JP
8060368 Mar 1996 JP
WO 9902754 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9906611 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9928538 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0051938 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0052740 Sep 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040216768 A1 Nov 2004 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09741529 Dec 2000 US
Child 10856654 US