Claims
- 1. A method of determining the relative area of a serif of a feature present on a photomask, said method comprising:identifying a feature having a serif; determining an intensity profile for a region of interest encompassing said feature with said serif; summing differences between data points on said profile and a constant value to calculate a flux value; and calculating a relative area of said serif from said flux value, whereby said relative area is useful for evaluating the quality of said photomask.
- 2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said feature is a line having a line end and said serif is present on said line end.
- 3. A method as recited in claim 2 wherein the width of said line is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
- 4. A mask used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, said mask resulting from a method of determining the relative area of a serif of a feature present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 1 through 3.
- 5. A semiconductor device, said semiconductor device resulting from a method of determining the relative area of a serif of a feature present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 1 through 3.
- 6. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the radius of said serif is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
- 7. A method of determining a separation distance between two features present on a photomask, said method comprising:defining a region of interest that spans the separation distance between said two features, a portion of each end of said region of interest being fully encompassed by one of said features; determining an intensity profile for said region of interest; summing differences between data points on said profile and a constant value to calculate a flux value; and calculating the separation distance between said features from said flux value, whereby said separation distance is useful for evaluating the quality of said photomask.
- 8. A method as recited in claim 7 wherein one of said features is a line end having serifs, said method further comprising:defining said region of interest such that said one end of said region is fully encompassed within said line end.
- 9. A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the separation distance is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
- 10. A mask used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, said mask resulting from a method of determining a separation distance between two features present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 7 through 9.
- 11. A semiconductor device, said semiconductor device resulting from a method of determining a separation distance between two features present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 7 through 9.
- 12. A method as recited in claim 7 wherein the radius of each of said two features is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
- 13. A method of determining the asymmetry of serifs of a line present on a photomask, said method comprising:identifying a line having a line end with at least one serif; defining a shank region of interest that includes the shank of said line and an end region of interest that includes the end of said line; determining intensity profiles for both regions of interest, said shank and end profiles being determined by summing values in a longitudinal direction with respect to said line; calculating an asymmetry area value for said serifs using said end intensity profile and a centroid of said shank region of interest, whereby said asymmetry area is useful for evaluating the quality of said photomask.
- 14. A method as recited in claim 13 wherein the width of said line is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
- 15. A mask used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, said mask resulting from a method of determining the asymmetry of serifs of a line present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claim 13 or 14.
- 16. A semiconductor device, said semiconductor device resulting from a method of determining the asymmetry of serifs of a line present on a photomask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claim 13 or 14.
- 17. A method as recited in claim 13 wherein the radius of each of said serifs is less than about twice the wavelength of the examining radiation.
Parent Case Info
This application claims priority of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/218,078, filed Jul. 12, 2000 entitled “Optical Proximity Correction Serif Measurement Technique,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 5,966,677 issued on Oct. 12, 1999 entitled “High Accuracy Particle Dimension Measurement System,” to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/657,920 filed on Sep. 8, 2000 entitled “Microscopic Feature Dimension Measurement System,” to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/342,526 filed on Jun. 29, 1999 entitled “High Accuracy Particle Dimension Measurement System,” to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/606,841 filed on Jun. 28, 2000 entitled “Microscopic Feature Opacity Measurement System,” and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/028,207 filed on Feb. 23, 1998 entitled “High Accuracy Particle Dimension Measurement System,” which are all incorporated by reference.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry |
Peter J. Fiekosky, Quotation (Preliminary), Oct. 17, 1994; KLA219 “Photomask Defect Inspection System (Phototype System)”. |
Nicholas Doe; Richard Eandi; Optical Proximity Effects in Sub-Micron Photomask CD Meterology; Advanced Imaging Systems, Zygo Corp. |
George et al., “A Practical and Precise Method for Mask Defect Size Measurement”, Mar. 10, 1996, Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Photo-lithography. |
Stocker, et al., “Characterisation of Defect Sizing on An automatic Inspection Station” (KLA238e), 1993, SPIE vol. 2087 Photomask Technology and Management. |
Kawahira, et al., Semi Standards Programmed Defect masks and Its Applications for Defect Inspection, SEMI Japan Standards Committee. |
Peter J. Fiekowsky, Quotation (Preliminary), Oct. 17, 1994. |
Fiekowsky et al., “Defet Printability Measurement on the KLA-351: Correlation to Defect Sizing Using the AVI Metrology System”, SPIE 19th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management Conference 3873, Sep. 1999. |
Tran et al., “Application of Image processing Software to Characterize the Photomask Key Parameters for Future Technologies,” Apr. 17-18, 1997, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 3096. |
Provisional Applications (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
|
60/218078 |
Jul 2000 |
US |